Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Stephen Cribb (1875-1963) with no known copyright restrictions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Files by Stephen Cribb (1875-1963) with no known copyright restrictions|year=2024|month=December|day=20}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Files by Stephen Cribb (1875-1963) with no known copyright restrictions|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Stephen Cribb (1875-1963) with no known copyright restrictions}} at the end of today's log.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

This is a relisting of images previously nominated under Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Stephen Cribb (1875-1963), which was closed as Procedural Keep. This group of images have been imported from Flickr where the stated licence is "no known copyright restrictions."

In each case, the author has been identified as "Cribb of Southsea," "S Cribb of Southsea" or "Stephen Cribb." Joseph Stephen Cribb is recorded as a press photographer from Southsea in Portsmouth, England. He is attributed as the author of many images taken in the Portsmouth area in the early 20th century, with a particular focus on ships and dockyards. From census and death records at FamilySearch, I have confirmed that he died in 1963 (See Wikidata entry). Based on the date of death the copyright on his works will expire in 2033, allowing upload on 1 January 2034. However, there may be other grounds as to why his works have entered the public domain or can otherwise be retained here under a different licence.

A declaration of "no known copyright restrictions," depends on the trustworthiness of the uploader in their ability to research the original copyright of the image. I am not a user of Flickr, so I am unclear whether a specific "public domain" tag can be chosen but as a general reader, "no known copyright restrictions" seems to mean that the uploader can't confirm the copyright status but is making an assumption that it is safe. Now that we have identified the files are potentially still in copyright, I would suggest the "no known copyright restrictions" claim is unsafe.

If the decision is made to delete these files, prior to deletion I'd recommend transfer of eligible files to English Wikipedia as the majority were published prior to 1926 (so PD under US law). We can set a template on the Wikipedia files that will identify them for transfer back to Commons in 2034. --From Hill To Shore (talk) 11:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Related discussions on the relisted nominations can be found through the links below. From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion, PD in the US. --Ellywa (talk) 21:11, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]