Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kids reel by Ivo Mostertman.webm
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Very likely to be a Frankenvideo of various copyright violations. At 2:00 is a part from a Landliebe commercial. At least their commercials on Youtube are not CC. Watchduck (quack) 23:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC) Watchduck (quack) 23:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Did you look at the rest of the channel? It's an advertising production company and the video is a demo reel their own work. czar 01:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- I did not find any Landliebe commercial in their list. This is the one at 2 min: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGFLJR8I_gw Would it make sense for Landliebe to publish their commercial under a CC licence, that would allow everyone to use and remix it? That would be very unusual. The Lebanon footage at 2:43 and the slum at 3:17 do not really fit in the picture. Watchduck (quack) 10:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- No, it isn't unusual for professional companies to release under cc licenses when they want to contribute to open culture. The agreement between the production company and their client is between them, and you're welcome to contact them to find out more, but I see no reason to doubt that the production company does not own the footage it used to make and license a demo reel. czar 16:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- I did not find any Landliebe commercial in their list. This is the one at 2 min: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGFLJR8I_gw Would it make sense for Landliebe to publish their commercial under a CC licence, that would allow everyone to use and remix it? That would be very unusual. The Lebanon footage at 2:43 and the slum at 3:17 do not really fit in the picture. Watchduck (quack) 10:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- @INeverCry: who reviewed the license. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- As Czar says, I didn't see any reason not to believe that the production company didn't own the footage. lNeverCry 17:21, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)