Commons:Deletion requests/File:Königsberger Kleinbahn VT51.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Photo scanned from book "Diesellokomotiven und Triebwagen in Glasers Annalen 1937 - 1953" published in 1987. There is no evidence that it was published 70 years ago. Licence is invalid. As long as there's no evidence that the photograph was released before 1953, we're talking about a fake license. Tycuca (talk) 11:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Die Aufnahme ist auf jedem Fall 100 Jahre alt. Nach dem 2.Weltkrieg hat es das Fahrzeug gar nicht mehr gegeben. Rainerhaufe (talk) 12:30, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please refer to Commons:Publication. The photo was taken almost 100 years ago. However, this does not mean that it was published over 70 years ago. Photo was only published in book from 1987. --Uoijm77 (talk) 09:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Keep Contemporary promotion image for immediate publication in the press, catalogues etc. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:11, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete Invalid argument. It is not known when it was published. In addition, the entire content of the book is copyrighted by the publisher. Respecting copyright is not about making claims without evidence. Probably the photo comes from a private collection. You cannot scan a photo from any book and assume it was published immediately after it was created. It can be assumed that the photo was published many years later. There is no evidence that there is a promotional photo. No one can immediately tell that a given photo was published immediately after it was taken. It shouldn't be discretionary. It can't be an arbitrary decision by one editor. --Uoijm77 (talk) 11:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please refer to Commons:Publication. The photo was taken almost 100 years ago. However, this does not mean that it was published over 70 years ago. Photo was only published in book from 1987. --Uoijm77 (talk) 09:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. This is obviously an old picture published long ago, as halftone is visible. --Yann (talk) 09:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
