Commons:Deletion requests/File:British Museum 2nd century bronze jug, with copyfraud notice.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:British Museum 2nd century bronze jug, with copyfraud notice.jpg

The label (specifically, the artwork of the camera) may be copyrighted. A version with that artwork cropped out is already available at File:British Museum 2nd century bronze jug.jpg. Mike Peel (talk) 12:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

This DR should be considered controversial and should stay open for at least 7 days. The simple camera icon in the sign may be such a small component that it is de minimis. The camera icon is unlikely to be the property of the museum and some searching may reveal its use elsewhere, it may well be copyright free or be on a suitable licence for reuse. --Fæ (talk) 13:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

 Keep Some quick research shows the camera icon to be free clipart, very widely used. Now uploaded to File:Camera-pictogram.jpg. --Fæ (talk) 13:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

• Keep The rationale for deletion has been answered by verifying the free license on the camera icon. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Keep, absolutely de minimis and perhaps that should have been considered by the nominator first. seb26 (talk) 13:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Keep The icon is free, and de minimis anyway. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Keep, the copyfraud label is the imporant part of this picture, the icon is free and the text is too short for copyright imho. Lionel Allorge (talk) 14:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Keep, per the above. Andy Mabbett (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Keep, per the above. Leutha (talk) 18:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Delete - The icon is not in fact adequately licensed, so far as I can tell. I reproduce here the text of the license information on FreeClipArtNow.com which is listed as the source on the upload page of File:Camera-pictogram.jpg. In my view, the final line is sufficient to exclude the file from Commons' scope, as clearly the licence does not extend to reproduction for any purpose. I hope everyone !voting with that justification will review their vote in the light of this. Further, I don't think either the icon or its role in this image is neglible enough for de minimis to apply. Regards, The Land (talk) 20:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

  FreeClipartNow.com grants you a nonexclusive use of the clipart images available on our website in accordance with these terms and conditions (the "license").

  Product Usage

  You are free to download and use clipart images found from this site on all projects. It's not necessary to provide a link back to this site, but it would be greatly appreciated.

  You may NOT use any component of our clipart or site content to produce what could be directly or indirectly considered a competitive venture against us.

  You may wish to review your vote in the light of the other DR discussion that Mike links below. There's more than one source and the alternate is clear about a CC0 release. If you have other reasons to see this photograph deleted based on discussions about this photograph elsewhere, it would be useful to put them openly in this DR. --Fæ (talk) 20:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Keep, de minimis. Site says "public domain clipart"[1] If it was not public domain than they should not say it is public domain. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
• Comment just to note that I've expressed my concerns about the claim of public domain, and de minimis, at Commons:Deletion requests/File:British Museum Fortuna statue, with copyfraud notice.jpg - the same concerns apply here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Keep, per the above. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:00, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Keep per Doc James · · · Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 20:02, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Keep even if the label is the primary subject of the image, the information above satisfys me that the image of the camera is freely licensed CC0/PD Gnangarra 02:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

---

Kept: as per consensus. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)