Commons:Deletion requests/File:319 самое интересное домашнеее порно.ogv
It is porn. LuiCJ (talk) 10:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- Low quality video, non educational, and contradicts with Commons' purpose.
Delete per COM:PORN. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 21:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC) 
Keep As these videos are the only video existent in Wikimedia Commons, it serves as a representation of porn video. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 15:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)- Keep I think that the video is educational, because, it show the people what is porn.
It shouldn't be prohibited, and many teenagers and adults pass by here, I have seen few or no children. 190.194.135.46 18:09, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It's kinda milquetoast pornography. --User123o987name (talk) 06:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PORN and COM:EDUSE. Trivialist (talk) 15:14, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because COM:PORN says: "If the quality is bad, we may keep the file if we have no better file on a subject it can illustrate." And considering that this is the only file that shows how a porn video looks like it should be kept because educational purposes.--A4exocet (talk) 10:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. ✗plicit 12:41, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, no realistic use etc. original arguments for keeping were incredibly poor, including two that claimed it is the only video on commons that shows what porn looks like (even though there are several historical porn videos on commons) and nonsense arguments like “it shouldn't be prohibited, and many teenagers and adults pass by here, I have seen few or no children” and “It's kinda milquetoast pornography”. Dronebogus (talk) 16:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- The video is so-so (in Russian Wikipedia it was heavily criticized for the essence of what is happening), but I do not see any special reasons for deleting. Lesless (talk) 19:45, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - We only have 6 videos in Category:Videos of penile-anal intercourse (female and male), Whilst it's not the greatest of qualities it's satisfactory and educational. I see no valid reason to delete. –Davey2010Talk 23:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not seeing a valid reason for deletion. The complaints about the arguments above don't make sense, and there's clearly an educational use for this.
- E.G. What does amateur anal porn look like? It looks like this file.
- And for what it's worth, commons is about more than just storing educational media, it's about sharing said media. I found this discussion because I saw the tag on the file, which I found because I needed a free-license file to use in another work, and this one literally fits every single criteria for that. MjolnirPants (talk) 23:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason given to delete, more of the same "arguments"... Tm (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: One of the only 2 videos in Category:Videos of creampie (sexual act) [anal] and hence, low quality cannot be taken a factor for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 14:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
This is porn 194.233.96.65 06:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept. The fact that it is porn is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)