Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Rosie Robinson

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Category:Rosie Robinson|year=2024|month=December|day=04}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Category:Rosie Robinson|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Rosie Robinson}} at the end of today's log.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Rosie Robinson

[edit]

All files from Category:Rosie Robinson. Just naming a few, in total 187.

Non-educative and out of scope. They are used on no WP article. The label and the file description show self-promotion, so also COM:ADVERT --Fuchs B (talk) 10:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just edited the description removing the self promotion and not being used in an article is not reason enough to delete. Out of the scope it is relative, they are professional quality photos that could be used in the future.--Wilfredor (talk) 14:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
per Wilfredor --Trougnouf (talk) 17:10, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Not this again. Why do people nominate files without taking a minimum of time to research to see that these are not self-promotion. Also not being in use is not a reason to delete and this, it authorship beyound any doubt, it educational use and scope was clearly established in previous deletion requests like:
1-Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from Lies Thru a Lens Flickr stream
2-this undeletion request3
3-Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2018/12#Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Files_from_Lies_Thru_a_Lens_Flickr_stream
4-Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Becci (model)
5-Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Ais (model)
6-Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kia (7639635810).jpg
7-Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2018/07#Mass_delete_help.
More than enough to see scope. Tm (talk) 20:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, per Tm. Although I’d support removing from each file description the spammy and creepy prose the photographer dishes out on Flickr (and it would be worth the while to research whether Flickr licensing covers only a photo or also its associated text…), proposing the deletion of a category is not the same as proposing the deletion of its contents, even of all its contents, and promotional text (that falls under COM:ADVERT) associated to either a file or a category should not be corrected by means of deletion of said file or category, but simply by removal of the text itself. And to address the o.p.’s actual point, no, these are pretty much in scope. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: cat not empty, nominate the files for deleteion not the cat pls. --JuTa 20:07, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Category:Rosie_Robinson&oldid=571331078"