Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Ais (model)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Ais (model)

Out of project scope

• File:Ais (8702289578).jpg
• File:Ais (8702764528).jpg
• File:Ais (8705620456).jpg
• File:Ais (8706192771).jpg
• File:Ais (8710034162).jpg
• File:Ais (8710503477).jpg
• File:Ais (8715379708).jpg
• File:Ais (8721962009).jpg
• File:Ais (8750432549).jpg
• File:Ais (8750855724).jpg
• File:Ais (9535159263).jpg
• File:Ais (9709322473).jpg
• File:Ais (9721303212).jpg
• File:Ais (9725917923).jpg
• File:Ais (9761106355).jpg

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

•  Keep Not this again. Clearly no personality rights problems, and clearly in project scope, as this files are categorized and per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from Lies Thru a Lens Flickr stream, Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2019-02#Files_from_Lies_Thru_a_Lens_Flickr_stream, and as discussed in the Village Pump at the time and Village_pump/Copyright. Also no valid reason given to delete.

What is "out of project scope"? Another attempt at deleting files that are not of the liking of the nominator? File is clearly in scope as this images, again without any personality or copyright problems, shows an model and the photographic process of an current Getty Images professional photographer and is in scope, just as an sample of wikipedia articles like Erotic photography, Depictions of nudity, Nude photography and Model (art). Also several of the same kind of images of this photographer were in use, before being deleted for the wrong reason, back in late 2018/early 2019. Tm (talk) 13:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

---

Kept: No valid reason for deletion - in scop. ~riley (talk) 23:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)