Commons:Deletion requests/Buildings and structures uploaded by David Wadie Fisher-Freberg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Buildings and structures uploaded by David Wadie Fisher-Freberg|year=2025|month=January|day=02}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Buildings and structures uploaded by David Wadie Fisher-Freberg|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Buildings and structures uploaded by David Wadie Fisher-Freberg}} at the end of today's log.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Buildings and structures uploaded by David Wadie Fisher-Freberg

[edit]

Since I think there would be no chance Commons would reverse its position on FoP-Indonesia, I kindly request that all of my contributions that will run into contrary with the position to be deleted. Thank you. dwf² 14:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree. Photos of Indonesian buildings that carry the risk for Wikimedia Foundation to be sued for Billions of Dollars should be purged (and besides they are very very unfair to the poor architects who have sacrificed a lot to go to architecture schools only for their works to be uploaded without permission here). They carry substantial risk. Similar photos uploaded by yours truly will be following soon. Bennylin (yes?) 14:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Some can be keep because they may already PD now, though, I'm not sure which files are met this. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If someone would love to ask me which files should keep:
Some that I'm not sure if keeping is okay or not:

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you ask me, I'd rather delete all of it, for the sake of making things simpler. dwf² 07:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom/uploader.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 07:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Nicht alles, was gebaut wird, ist auch ein Kunstwerk und geschützt. Was soll z. B. hier geschützt sein? Das kann genauso irgendwo anders auf der Erde sein. Schlichte Betonbauwerke sind nirgendwo geschützt, Moscheen sehen seit Jahrhunderten gleich aus, deren Gestaltung ist auch nichts Besonderesss. --Ralf Roletschek 07:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete all that shows buildings and also accompanying sculptures if any;  Keep those that either fulfill COM:De minimis (unless Indonesia doesn't recognize de minimis) or those that show buildings that are in public domain (70 years have passed since architects' death or 50 years have passed since publication, if the building is a joint work of architectural firms, see COM:Indonesia). I almost concur with Liuxinyu970226 for this case. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Slashing my input on DM, if Indonesia is like the Philippines where de minimis doesn't exist in reality (and the application is subjective). Also if threshold of originality in Indonesia is very low (even simple buildings are copyrighted). However, I still poll for keep those structures whose architects and sculptors have been dead for more than 70 years. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Admins: the longer this request goes, the longer time I would be exposed to legal liability under your interpretation of Indonesian law. Please resolve it now. dwf² 11:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per my comment in here: please have the decency not to stall this request and go with what you want. Thanks! dwf² 14:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted most of them, kept some of them. --4nn1l2 (talk) 03:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]