Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/07/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 15th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic image; doesn't appear to have been uploaded for the purposes of any Wikimedia project. Blakegripling ph (talk) 00:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a TV screenshot Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Rama. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a TV screenshot. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: welp, already deleted by Rama. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from here (which has been deleted priviously) has been modifiyed so that copyvio tools can't find it and re-uploaded Steinsplitter (talk) 15:04, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clear case, i speedy deleted it. Keeping this for transparency. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty gallery, has existed for 15 days with nothing in it Reguyla (talk) 14:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion OK Beethoven9


Deleted: per nomination, should have been a category. --Achim (talk) 17:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:SČÍTÁNÍ ČÍSEL.pdf

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France. Hergé died in 1983.

BrightRaven (talk) 11:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ILOVEBALCARRAS69+1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images. Out of scope and possible copyvio in one case

Reguyla (talk) 17:12, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info User:ILOVEBALCARRAS69+1 is blocked indef on en:wp per 'vandalism only account'. --Achim (talk) 19:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvios, images used for vandalising on en:wp. --Achim (talk) 20:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anal Brothel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not a porn site. Out of scope

Reguyla (talk) 17:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination/COM:PORN/COM:ADVERT. --INeverCry 20:09, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 01:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-upload after deletion, advertising. @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 12:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 01:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-upload after deletion, advertising. @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 12:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 01:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-upload after deletion, advertising. @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 12:58, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 01:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 01:20, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused redirect (typo in the year: 1869 should read 1871) Adavyd (talk) 01:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, then re-upload Can't simply rename.


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

HERRAMIENTAS TECNOLÓGICAS EDUCATIVAS Kyra 18 (talk) 02:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 00:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liukpalla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos, unlikely to be own work, no source or copyright information. A couple can be found elsewhere on the web.

--ghouston (talk) 03:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marvincastroespinoza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

advertising / self promotion

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

requested by the uploader, to upload a new version Ahmed1251985 (talk) 06:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Tasnim News doesn't give a free licese, uploader has already multiple warnings.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright concern Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 07:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Internet meme pepe the frog https://www.google.com/images?safe=off&q=pepe+the+frog

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechte wurden falsch eingetragen Theluke907 (talk) 18:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Rechte wurden falsch eingetragen

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zahiralbarqi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Those are photographs by British explorer en:Wilfred Thesiger, who died in 2003. Info on their respective museum pages here and here. Said museum knows nothing about the claimed CC licenses, but instead states "© Pitt Rivers Museum, University of Oxford". The photos were apparently taken in 1946 in Saudi-Arabia, but does that make them PD-Saudi Arabia as claimed? It is unsure when and where they were first published. If Thesiger published them, I guess he did so in the UK, not in Saudi-Arabia.

Rosenzweig τ 21:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also includes:

Sorry, I don't speak English! But I have question, why the wikicommons doesn't Delete this pic File:SulaimanKhel.jpg by en:Wilfred Thesiger!!? It is from 12th October?!--Zahiralbarqi (talk) 23:21, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently because nobody saw it yet as the copyvio it is. I have included it now in this deletion request. --Rosenzweig τ 00:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think the pics of Wilfred Thesiger is public ownership by Abu Dhabi Tourism Authority http://web.prm.ox.ac.uk/thesiger/index.php/thesigers-journeys/9-thesigers-journeys-in-arabia-hejaz-saudi-arabia-1946.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zahiralbarqi (talk • contribs) 04:03, 30. Mai 2013‎ (UTC+02:00)
This is a curious theory. I find nothing to support it in the link you offered. --Rosenzweig τ 13:52, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can Can ask Pitt Rivers Museum about the license here (Mail)! ms-photo.colls@prm.ox.ac.uk

--حامد البلوي (talk) 05:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why should I? Either they declare a license acceptable for Commons publicly, or the uploader manages to get it documented via COM:OTRS. This is not the obligation of anybody else. --Rosenzweig τ 22:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS FASTILY 20:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zahiralbarqi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All other images of Arab celebrities uploaded by this user were copyvios grabbed from somewhere on the web. Even if Google Image Search didn't find those, they are very likely from some board, Twitter or Youtube profile; they should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Please also look for empty categories after file deletions.

I'm not sure if the same is true for the landscape etc. images by this user; while there were some copyvios in the past, at least some of them cold be legit. Just for the record, User:Memomoon seems to be a sock of this user.

Rosenzweig τ 20:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zahiralbarqi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Zahiralbarqi/logs (+/- 100 copyvios since 1st upload in 2012) = 2x blocked serial copyright violator: photoshopper, file cropper, watermark remover, social media grabber (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.), Panoramio grabber and also a local serial copyright violator since 2012 (per local user talk). Most (if not all) local "own works" uploads most likely all grabbed from Internet. See also previous mass DR above.

Ignoring 3-4 high res uploads taken with a Samsung GT-I9300 due to short time between taken and upload date and some files (logos, etc.) in PD or which would be in PD anyways.

Gunnex (talk) 18:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also (per above) all local uploads by this user which were transferred to Commons:

Gunnex (talk) 18:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Having reviewed all above files (inc prev requests), I've blocked the user indef (two prev. blocks) and deleted all copyvios. ~riley (talk) 00:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error imagen repetida Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 23:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error en la numeracion por el error de la imagen repetida Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 23:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error en la numeracion por el error de una imagen repetida Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 23:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error en la numeracion por el error de una imagen repetida Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 23:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error en la numeracion por el error de una imagen repetida Freddycanaviri777 (talk) 23:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Photo" of a copyrighted work of art. Copyright violaton. Rapsar (talk) 17:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see Category:Atomium. there is no FOP in Belgium. FOP case. Amitie 10g (talk) 10:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nope: there is FOP in Belgium now. --BrightRaven (talk) 15:46, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation of http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/ravindra-jadeja-of-india-celebrates-taking-the-wicket-of-ravi-rampaul-picture-id170333136 117.221.122.65 18:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded on 26th december, 2015, and it is visible in the next page ([1]) (February 26th, 2013). So, I think it was uploaded without permission. Balles2601 (talk) 18:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I question the "own work". It is probably a crop of this photo. It is the only contribution of the user. No meta data Wouter (talk) 09:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found elsewhere http://www.nosgalan.co.uk/cy/mysteryrunners.aspx without watermark Dacoucou (talk) 15:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

speedy delete Victor Shyu (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete Victor Shyu (talk) 14:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping 5 July 2016 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:青岛维基人聚餐照.jpg (out of scope). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -- no source - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Datei wird besser ersetzt durch die "Detailkonstruktion der Neutralebene", welche bereits hochgeladen wurde Hsch31 (talk) 18:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Hsch31

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal selfie, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubt about ownership by uploader, due to watermark "Pat's Photography 2014". -- Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 187.126.213.15 as no license (no license). There is a license, but its doubtfully own work as stated. JuTa 20:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either unused personal photo (out of scope) or copyvio, judging by the watermark. (No relation to/recreation of previously deleted file.) P 1 9 9   03:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP for that in Russia Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Crimea) FoP not ok for that nor in Russia neither in Ukraine Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexlipetsk48 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, small/middle size, all other uploads speedy deleted for obvious copyvios or nominated for deletion

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo Nahid.rajbd (talk) 06:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya repetido en otro posterior. Gracias Javipyarza (talk) 09:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

También repetido con otro posterior más correcto. Gracias Javipyarza (talk) 09:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality unused personal photo, out of scope; the only upload by this user Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope - personal photo by persistent sockpuppetteer, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tshavis JohnCD (talk) 11:12, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Camille Bombois is dead in 1970. Copyright violation. 83.204.246.51 11:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe IP is right, oops and sorry. :-/ Palosirkka (talk) 18:53, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:SiS735.png, which was taken from my old Flickr portfolio along with the biased (i.e. unsuitable for Wikipedia) description. Trio3D (talk) 11:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:SiS968.png, which was taken from my old Flickr portfolio along with the biased (i.e. unsuitable for Wikipedia) description. Trio3D (talk) 12:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:TD3088A.jpg, which was taken from my old Flickr portfolio. Trio3D (talk) 12:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:VT8237R+.jpg, which was taken from my old Flickr portfolio along with the biased (i.e. unsuitable for Wikipedia) description. Trio3D (talk) 12:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jean-Pierre Vielfaure is dead in 2015. Copyright violation. 83.204.246.51 12:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: otrs. --INeverCry 00:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Trident 3DImage9750.jpg, which was taken from my old Flickr portfolio along with the biased (i.e. unsuitable for Wikipedia) description. Trio3D (talk) 12:04, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images were copied from the internet. Unclear if uploader has the right to upload these images under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Even though the uploader asserts that these are "Image from a news article meant for public use", it is not known if the creators of these photos agreed to this assertion.

Takeaway (talk) 12:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, COM:OTRS permission needed. Steinsplitter (talk) 12:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Affects also the following files (we need a permission for the shown artwork):

--Wdwd (talk) 14:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry Picture Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope - personal photo by persistent sockpuppetteer, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tshavis JohnCD (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry Picture Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anhybarato (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Reguyla (talk) 14:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Personal photo of a hoaxer, article deleted at en:Aditya Barwar. JohnCD (talk) 14:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty gallery page Reguyla (talk) 14:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://66.media.tumblr.com/7b324a50f8110466c6a2cbc0b20a609b/tumblr_mu0e6wmXaT1s6k6d8o1_500.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:23, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fouad Osama (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Listerine2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://hdwallpaperbackgrounds.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Green-Plant-Growing-Soil-Desktop-Wallpapers-1024x640.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TatouageRoyal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erjaaxde (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasiek przybylski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasiek przybylski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.pzla.pl/upload/Suwalki2016/_FTK1594.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviosly not own work as claimed. Unknown author, not old enough (1943) to assume PD. Druschba 4 (talk) 14:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source not possible to identify. No permission, unknown author. Druschba 4 (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

External source can still be found in exif data, watermark in picture. Very unlikely to be own work as claimed. Druschba 4 (talk) 15:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User has uploaded several files of the same subject in the same quality, all of them copyvios. Very unlikely that he or she was 60 years ago allowed to take photos of technical details of a prototype of soviet military technology. Druschba 4 (talk) 15:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a television screenshot, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the stripes, obviously a screenshot from tv or computer, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's currently 2016... there is no way to have 2017 election data on a map in 2016. AND please note the file is clearly marked (c) in lower left hand corner. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is some form of POV or "alternate history", as it is 2016 claiming to be a map of a presidential election which hasn't happened yet, please also notice the captioning for who was allegedly running. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A map showing some form of "alternate history" rather than actual fact. The map has no bearing on reality as seen in the 2016 primaries. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this rephotograph from a prior photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this photo of a photograph. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused blurry picture of a keyboard. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused packaging photo, also blurry as if it were screen-capped. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image needs a description and a category, also it is very small and low quality, and not in use. But it seems an interesting street view, so I'm requesting more information if possible. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Info "(...) so I'm requesting more information if possible." Sure --> grabbed & photoshopped from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/15658708 (2008, © All rights reserved by "aghazvini"). See also User talk:Rain lover and File:Asian cup iraq.jpg (another transferred local upload by this user) = grabbed from Getty Images. Gunnex (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image predates 1946, however the PD-US license looks incorrect. The transfer log reads "== Summary == PD under Greek law == Licensing == PD-US" so somehow this was turned from free of copyright in Greece, to "PD US" which seems rather unlikely. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, Facebook sized image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blurry image of temporary holiday decorations, assuming in UK. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF states the photographer is John D. Parker. No evidence of permission Videoupload4nice (talk) 16:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fatbog27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images. Out of scope

Reguyla (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Reguyla (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File quite identical to File:Louvre Museum (7465501086).jpg. There is no encyclopedic value to have 2 photos so similar Tangopaso (talk) 17:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred photo similar to File:Palais du Louvre 97 2012-06-29.jpg. No encyclopedic value. Tangopaso (talk) 17:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toonratthaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

derivative works of unclear copyright statut

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Toonratthaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work "FBMD" in the metadata means it comes from facebook

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WGKönigsee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

so small that it is hard to think they are own works..

Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image of a no quite noyable people : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the author's own work. Edjoerv (talk) 18:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:02, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image of no quite notable people : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image, wrong license, the file is from internet. kovox90      18:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image, wrong license, the file is from internet. kovox90      18:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. kovox90      19:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of an non-notable person —Hexafluoride (talk) 19:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of a non-notable person —Hexafluoride (talk) 19:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of a non-notable person —Hexafluoride (talk) 19:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of a non-notable person. Duplicate file by a duplicate account. —Hexafluoride (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of a non-notable person. —Hexafluoride (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of a non-notable person. —Hexafluoride (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of a non-notable person. —Hexafluoride (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, questionable "own work" Wcam (talk) 20:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 天蝎高科技 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising

Wcam (talk) 20:04, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image Wcam (talk) 20:09, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Huang Ching Chung (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of sheet music that are most likely non-free

Wcam (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: text only Wcam (talk) 20:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaojiawei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: promotional/unused images with unclear educational purpose

Wcam (talk) 20:18, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Furusho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Contain unfree logos of teams

/St1995 20:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No wiki usage, and he's not the most sexy man on Earth. ·×ald·es 20:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely a copyright breach. This is a recent graphic banner coming from a bank advertisement. See also Special:Contributions/Spinalgr1990 for other similar uploads. Gts-tg (talk) 20:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely a copyright breach. This is a recent graphic banner coming from a bank advertisement. See also Special:Contributions/Spinalgr1990 for other similar uploads.Gts-tg (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation, tagged with a licence of CC-BY-SA Gts-tg (talk) 21:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sovtest ATE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Since the other files of this user are copyvio, I suspect that these files are also copyvio, but I can't find their source.

Dmitry89 (talk) 21:15, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tshavis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Uploader is a serial sockpuppetteer (see SPI) and time-waster. None of these has any educational value.

JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is more of a touristy snap, and we now have more photos of Atomium than we know what to do with. Videoupload4nice (talk) 21:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Media in commons must have an educative value and be useful for something. This doesn't seem to be the case (an imaginary family tree with a so bizarre watermark that makes it useless) Discasto talk 21:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (derived from File:Carcharhinus falciformis off Cuba.jpg). Gunnex (talk) 22:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorization from the author/drawer Benoît Prieur (d) 22:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (129x213 px) resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously edited. Gunnex (talk) 23:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the photograph was published before 1970, as required by the copyright tag. Eleassar (t/p) 23:12, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused rendering-copy of File: Gemeinde Feldhorst Wappen.svg, same uploader, same day. ↔ User: Perhelion 23:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small Picture, not used Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no reason for deletion.--Wdwd (talk) 18:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, small unused photo, included in "Categories (++): Unidentified locations in Germany". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small picture, not used Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. small low quality picture not in use. We do not need thumbnail size pictures with unclear attribution. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question, why to delete Dear Eugene, at first (may be you know it) I am new in Wikipedia. But I think this Document is not unused. And I dont know, what or why you think its a document of questionable notability - the weblink to source / "Quelle" is to further information (e.g., local history). If there is a need to delete the weblink to manufactorers firma, I can do so. May be (and here I am sure you are right), its better to move it in Wiki-text. I had to learn how to do it (there are help sites - or want you to help me and send a proposal?).

next, our scool is a "Geschwister-Scholl-Schule", too, and there is a group working on text for "Geschwister-Scholl-Weg und Gedenkstein in Ruhland" and "Geschwister-Scholl-Schule in Ruhland", or for "Geschwister-Scholl-Weg, Schule und Gedenksteine in Ruhland". There is an existing site (or page) "Geschwister-Scholl-Weg und Gedenkstein in Ruhland" in Wikipedia to whitch we want move the text, but we need time - vacation comes and I think, it will be september or october till the workgroup will meet again.

at last, all members of workgrop (and many more, and director and teachers, too) are so happy and proud, to be in Wikipedia, yet. Please give me and them half a year before deleting the pdf or send me a proposal for moving the information to the existing site "Geschwister-Scholl-Weg und Gedenkstein in Ruhland".

Thanks for help ! Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 16:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

answer, please Dear Eugene, my problem with this pdf is, that there are 2 pictures whith each a comment and a comment to the topic. I resolved it with a pdf, not better were a jpg with one comment. You didnt answer, so I dont know which is the best solution of my problem. I can solve this fast and good with your help or fast and wrong.

Another ( and a big) problem is, that (non-Wikipedan) visitors (e.g. from our scool) ar shocked of the deletion mark. So please anwer and temporary remove teh deletio mark yourself or I will will do so - today afternoon - excuse me !! - I will work fast on the problem, but without your answers its not easy.

We can phone, too, 49 035752 30145 - or you give the problem to a german administrator. But till that, please remove the deletion mark !!!

08:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

additionally remark Eugene, I find its wrong not to answer.

additionally remark: here are 10 or 12 people whitch want to remove the name "Geschwister Scholl" 10 years ago, and they applaude to you - they dont know the mechanism of Wikipedia discussion. I am glad, this deletion mark is not in Twitter or Facebook, yet.

Seems, I must seek a quick and dirty solution because of this and your silence.Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 11:44, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One of photos from PDF are already uploaded as File:Geschwister-Scholl-Gedenkstein in Ruhland.jpg. I think you need to upload second as image. Text belong to page in one of WMF projects or file descriptions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

answer ?

Dear Eugene, yor answer is not enough to show me what I shall do with my pdf, if I upload the "second image" (its only detail of the first) - its enough then or what ?

So lock - temporally remove - the deletion mark (if the pdf has a chance after uploading the second jpg), or delete the pdf-file immediately. And I will create a jpg of both pictures and upload it with one comment - a "third-class-solution", but (may be) correct. And answer me, as a Newcomer, to my last asks to the pdf as solving my problem.

You can help me with a proposal to solve (a better solution), without pdf.

I asked otherwise, how I can show any pictures of the same theme in "Hans an Sophie Scholl" - create a sub-category, using a tool ? - but probably all are too busy, so I created the pdf. May be, you have a tipp, I found nothing therefore in Help - perhaps my seeking was not exakt. And if I see the code of such page / site, I can see "only categories" and a can do nothing to insert a Sub-category or some new images under one new theme. Sorry - I'm new, and shit, I dont know enough.

Thanks for answer and help, and / or thanks for fast deletion the file

Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 23:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

to the admin and all interested Commonsians

Hallo und guten Tag, (- normally I write better in german, but with respekt to the initiator of this deletion request I will write in english.)

This is an unfortuneously case for me, I am new here and had to protect the interests of members of a workig group on local history at our scool, too. I.e., I had to encourage them. And they had the idea, to create and upload this document as a quick solution of a complex information to one object. I want not once more write, what I tried to explain above. But if you have questions, plese ask me. To avoid damages, I deleted the significant category in (or for) the uploaded file.

The intention of my questions to deletion requests initiator were

1. avoid shocking members of the working group

2. (how) can I heal the flaw (or conflict with Commons rules)

  e.g. a similiar jpg instead of the pdf ? or will this be wrong, too ?
  or is there text in the pdf which must be changed ?
  or is it a borderline case, and can be kept ?

Indeed I think (and all members of workig group which were involved, felt so) that the initiator of a deletions request should be able to "say", and, if asked, should say or better explain, what, from his point of view, has to corrected (may be, there are 2 or 3 ways to solutions - or none - and where is the concret mistake). If I'm not right - it were pity for the community. May be, he had not to do so, and its admins work.

Sure, not every has enough time or can explain in other languages. But this case I found wrong - even, what here is exact, right or else. One of my questions was rather to Wikipedian than to Commonsian - sorry.

Still I think that there was and is a good mind, and I ever thought on what I readed: "f you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!"

But I looked for concret argument, explanation, help - and found a little more then nothing. I'm new and must learn - need explanations - once more sorry.

Thanks for answer Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

answer ?

Dear Eugene, yor answer is not enough to show me what I shall do with my pdf, if I upload the "second image" (its only detail of the first) - its enough then or what ?

So lock - temporally remove - the deletion mark (if the pdf has a chance after uploading the second jpg), or delete the pdf-file immediately. And I will create a jpg of both pictures and upload it with one comment - a "third-class-solution", but (may be) correct. And answer me, as a Newcomer, to my last asks to the pdf as solving my problem.

You can help me with a proposal to solve (a better solution), without pdf.

I asked otherwise, how I can show any pictures of the same theme in "Hans an Sophie Scholl" - create a sub-category, using a tool ? - but probably all are too busy, so I created the pdf. May be, you have a tipp, I found nothing therefore in Help - perhaps my seeking was not exakt. And if I see the code of such page / site, I can see "only categories" and a can do nothing to insert a Sub-category or some new images under one new theme. Sorry - I'm new, and shit, I dont know enough.

Thanks for answer and help, and / or thanks for fast deletion the file

Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 23:10, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

to the admin and all interested Commonsians

Hallo und guten Tag, (- normally I write better in german, but with respekt to the initiator of this deletion request I will write in english.)

This is an unfortuneously case for me, I am new here and had to protect the interests of members of a workig group on local history at our scool, too. I.e., I had to encourage them. And they had the idea, to create and upload this document as a quick solution of a complex information to one object. I want not once more write, what I tried to explain above. But if you have questions, plese ask me. To avoid damages, I deleted the significant category in (or for) the uploaded file.

The intention of my questions to deletion requests initiator were

1. avoid shocking members of the working group

2. (how) can I heal the flaw (or conflict with Commons rules)

  e.g. a similiar jpg instead of the pdf ? or will this be wrong, too ?
  or is there text in the pdf which must be changed ?
  or is it a borderline case, and can be kept ?

Indeed I think (and all members of workig group which were involved, felt so) that the initiator of a deletions requestshould be able to "say", and, if asked, should say or better explain, what, from his point of view, has to corrected (may be, there are 2 or 3 ways to solutions - or none - and where is the concret mistake). If I'm not right - it were pity for the community. May be, he had not to do so, and its admins work.

Sure, not every has enough time or can explain in other languages. But this case I found wrong - even, what here is exact, right or else. One of my questions was rather to Wikipedian than to Commonsian - sorry.

Still I think that there was and is a good mind, and I ever thought on what I readed: "f you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!"

But I looked for concret argument, explanation, help - and found a little more then nothing. I'm new and must learn - need explanations - once more sorry.

Thanks for answer Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, please read COM:SCOPE about the types of files hosted on Commons and please read COM:L about licensing images. If uploader has additional questions, please reply to me at my talk page, with the consideration that we are in different time zones and not to be impatient. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:13, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥그냥 Donquixote20 (talk) 11:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request, unused. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by painter, painter alive Kvrzpvzrkz (talk) 07:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hier ist die Erlaubnis des Autors:


Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----------

Von: Eike Hensch <eike.hensch@gmx.de> An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org Cc: Elmar Nolte <nolte@elnos.de> Datum: 5. Juli 2016 um 11:01 Betreff: Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Einbeck_1964.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geh%C3%B6ft_(Holland)_1980.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steinhuder_Meer_von_Bergkirchen_aus_1982.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herbstlandschaft_bei_Verden_1985.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetuan_1984.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polperro_1986-2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Verden_Aller.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stadtmauer,_Einbeck.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuchhalle_Krakau.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locarno_(Hensch).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tafraoute,_Marokko.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lido,_Venedig.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eike_Hensch_lacht.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wohnhaus_in_Platjenwerbe.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wettbewerb_Realschule_Soltau.jpg

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de). Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird. 05.07.2016 Eike Hensch -- Prof. Eike Georg Hensch Neue Straße 20 D-31582 Nienburg 0049(0)5021-66236 www.hensch-geomantie.de


Deleted: no permission received via OTRS; ticket:2016070510007843 does not cover this painting. --Wdwd (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by painter, painter alive Kvrzpvzrkz (talk) 07:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hier ist die Erlaubnis des Autors:


Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----------

Von: Eike Hensch <eike.hensch@gmx.de> An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org Cc: Elmar Nolte <nolte@elnos.de> Datum: 5. Juli 2016 um 11:01 Betreff: Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Einbeck_1964.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geh%C3%B6ft_(Holland)_1980.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steinhuder_Meer_von_Bergkirchen_aus_1982.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herbstlandschaft_bei_Verden_1985.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetuan_1984.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polperro_1986-2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Verden_Aller.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stadtmauer,_Einbeck.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuchhalle_Krakau.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locarno_(Hensch).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tafraoute,_Marokko.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lido,_Venedig.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eike_Hensch_lacht.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wohnhaus_in_Platjenwerbe.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wettbewerb_Realschule_Soltau.jpg

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de). Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird. 05.07.2016 Eike Hensch -- Prof. Eike Georg Hensch Neue Straße 20 D-31582 Nienburg 0049(0)5021-66236 www.hensch-geomantie.de

Elmar Nolte (talk) 08:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission received via OTRS; ticket:2016070510007843 does not cover this painting. --Wdwd (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by painter, painter alive Kvrzpvzrkz (talk) 07:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hier ist die Erlaubnis des Autors:


Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----------

Von: Eike Hensch <eike.hensch@gmx.de> An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org Cc: Elmar Nolte <nolte@elnos.de> Datum: 5. Juli 2016 um 11:01 Betreff: Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Einbeck_1964.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geh%C3%B6ft_(Holland)_1980.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steinhuder_Meer_von_Bergkirchen_aus_1982.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herbstlandschaft_bei_Verden_1985.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetuan_1984.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polperro_1986-2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Verden_Aller.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stadtmauer,_Einbeck.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuchhalle_Krakau.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locarno_(Hensch).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tafraoute,_Marokko.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lido,_Venedig.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eike_Hensch_lacht.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wohnhaus_in_Platjenwerbe.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wettbewerb_Realschule_Soltau.jpg

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de). Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird. 05.07.2016 Eike Hensch -- Prof. Eike Georg Hensch Neue Straße 20 D-31582 Nienburg 0049(0)5021-66236 www.hensch-geomantie.de


Deleted: no permission received via OTRS; ticket:2016070510007843 does not cover this painting. --Wdwd (talk) 19:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by painter, painter alive Kvrzpvzrkz (talk) 07:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hier ist die Erlaubnis des Autors:


Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----------

Von: Eike Hensch <eike.hensch@gmx.de> An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org Cc: Elmar Nolte <nolte@elnos.de> Datum: 5. Juli 2016 um 11:01 Betreff: Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Einbeck_1964.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geh%C3%B6ft_(Holland)_1980.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steinhuder_Meer_von_Bergkirchen_aus_1982.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herbstlandschaft_bei_Verden_1985.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetuan_1984.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polperro_1986-2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Verden_Aller.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stadtmauer,_Einbeck.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuchhalle_Krakau.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locarno_(Hensch).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tafraoute,_Marokko.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lido,_Venedig.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eike_Hensch_lacht.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wohnhaus_in_Platjenwerbe.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wettbewerb_Realschule_Soltau.jpg

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de). Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird. 05.07.2016 Eike Hensch -- Prof. Eike Georg Hensch Neue Straße 20 D-31582 Nienburg 0049(0)5021-66236 www.hensch-geomantie.de


Deleted: no permission received via OTRS; ticket:2016070510007843 does not cover this painting. --Wdwd (talk) 19:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by painter, painter alive Kvrzpvzrkz (talk) 07:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hier ist die Erlaubnis des Autors:


Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----------

Von: Eike Hensch <eike.hensch@gmx.de> An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org Cc: Elmar Nolte <nolte@elnos.de> Datum: 5. Juli 2016 um 11:01 Betreff: Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Einbeck_1964.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geh%C3%B6ft_(Holland)_1980.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steinhuder_Meer_von_Bergkirchen_aus_1982.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herbstlandschaft_bei_Verden_1985.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetuan_1984.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polperro_1986-2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Verden_Aller.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stadtmauer,_Einbeck.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuchhalle_Krakau.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locarno_(Hensch).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tafraoute,_Marokko.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lido,_Venedig.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eike_Hensch_lacht.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wohnhaus_in_Platjenwerbe.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wettbewerb_Realschule_Soltau.jpg

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de). Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird. 05.07.2016 Eike Hensch -- Prof. Eike Georg Hensch Neue Straße 20 D-31582 Nienburg 0049(0)5021-66236 www.hensch-geomantie.de


Deleted: no permission received via OTRS; ticket:2016070510007843 does not cover this painting. --Wdwd (talk) 19:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by painter, painter alive Kvrzpvzrkz (talk) 07:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hier ist die Erlaubnis des Autors:


Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----------

Von: Eike Hensch <eike.hensch@gmx.de> An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org Cc: Elmar Nolte <nolte@elnos.de> Datum: 5. Juli 2016 um 11:01 Betreff: Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Einbeck_1964.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geh%C3%B6ft_(Holland)_1980.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steinhuder_Meer_von_Bergkirchen_aus_1982.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herbstlandschaft_bei_Verden_1985.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetuan_1984.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polperro_1986-2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Verden_Aller.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stadtmauer,_Einbeck.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuchhalle_Krakau.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locarno_(Hensch).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tafraoute,_Marokko.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lido,_Venedig.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eike_Hensch_lacht.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wohnhaus_in_Platjenwerbe.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wettbewerb_Realschule_Soltau.jpg

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de). Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird. 05.07.2016 Eike Hensch -- Prof. Eike Georg Hensch Neue Straße 20 D-31582 Nienburg 0049(0)5021-66236 www.hensch-geomantie.de


Deleted: no permission received via OTRS; ticket:2016070510007843 does not cover this painting. --Wdwd (talk) 19:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by painter, painter alive Kvrzpvzrkz (talk) 07:46, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hier ist die Erlaubnis des Autors:


Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----------

Von: Eike Hensch <eike.hensch@gmx.de> An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org Cc: Elmar Nolte <nolte@elnos.de> Datum: 5. Juli 2016 um 11:01 Betreff: Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Einbeck_1964.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geh%C3%B6ft_(Holland)_1980.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steinhuder_Meer_von_Bergkirchen_aus_1982.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herbstlandschaft_bei_Verden_1985.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetuan_1984.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polperro_1986-2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Verden_Aller.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stadtmauer,_Einbeck.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuchhalle_Krakau.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locarno_(Hensch).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tafraoute,_Marokko.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lido,_Venedig.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eike_Hensch_lacht.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wohnhaus_in_Platjenwerbe.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wettbewerb_Realschule_Soltau.jpg

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de). Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird. 05.07.2016 Eike Hensch -- Prof. Eike Georg Hensch Neue Straße 20 D-31582 Nienburg 0049(0)5021-66236 www.hensch-geomantie.de


Deleted: no permission received via OTRS; ticket:2016070510007843 does not cover this painting. --Wdwd (talk) 19:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by painter, painter alive Kvrzpvzrkz (talk) 07:47, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hier ist die Erlaubnis des Autors:


Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----------

Von: Eike Hensch <eike.hensch@gmx.de> An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org Cc: Elmar Nolte <nolte@elnos.de> Datum: 5. Juli 2016 um 11:01 Betreff: Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Einbeck_1964.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geh%C3%B6ft_(Holland)_1980.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steinhuder_Meer_von_Bergkirchen_aus_1982.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herbstlandschaft_bei_Verden_1985.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetuan_1984.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polperro_1986-2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Verden_Aller.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stadtmauer,_Einbeck.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuchhalle_Krakau.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locarno_(Hensch).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tafraoute,_Marokko.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lido,_Venedig.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eike_Hensch_lacht.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wohnhaus_in_Platjenwerbe.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wettbewerb_Realschule_Soltau.jpg

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de). Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird. 05.07.2016 Eike Hensch -- Prof. Eike Georg Hensch Neue Straße 20 D-31582 Nienburg 0049(0)5021-66236 www.hensch-geomantie.de


Deleted: no permission received via OTRS; ticket:2016070510007843 does not cover this painting. --Wdwd (talk) 19:54, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by painter, painter alive Kvrzpvzrkz (talk) 07:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hier ist die Erlaubnis des Autors:


Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----------

Von: Eike Hensch <eike.hensch@gmx.de> An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org Cc: Elmar Nolte <nolte@elnos.de> Datum: 5. Juli 2016 um 11:01 Betreff: Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Einbeck_1964.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geh%C3%B6ft_(Holland)_1980.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steinhuder_Meer_von_Bergkirchen_aus_1982.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herbstlandschaft_bei_Verden_1985.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetuan_1984.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polperro_1986-2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Verden_Aller.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stadtmauer,_Einbeck.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuchhalle_Krakau.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locarno_(Hensch).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tafraoute,_Marokko.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lido,_Venedig.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eike_Hensch_lacht.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wohnhaus_in_Platjenwerbe.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wettbewerb_Realschule_Soltau.jpg

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de). Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird. 05.07.2016 Eike Hensch -- Prof. Eike Georg Hensch Neue Straße 20 D-31582 Nienburg 0049(0)5021-66236 www.hensch-geomantie.de


Deleted: no permission received via OTRS; ticket:2016070510007843 does not cover this painting. --Wdwd (talk) 19:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by painter, painter alive Kvrzpvzrkz (talk) 07:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hier ist die Erlaubnis des Autors:


Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----------

Von: Eike Hensch <eike.hensch@gmx.de> An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org Cc: Elmar Nolte <nolte@elnos.de> Datum: 5. Juli 2016 um 11:01 Betreff: Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Einbeck_1964.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geh%C3%B6ft_(Holland)_1980.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steinhuder_Meer_von_Bergkirchen_aus_1982.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herbstlandschaft_bei_Verden_1985.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetuan_1984.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Polperro_1986-2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Verden_Aller.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stadtmauer,_Einbeck.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tuchhalle_Krakau.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locarno_(Hensch).jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tafraoute,_Marokko.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lido,_Venedig.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eike_Hensch_lacht.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wohnhaus_in_Platjenwerbe.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wettbewerb_Realschule_Soltau.jpg

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de). Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird. 05.07.2016 Eike Hensch -- Prof. Eike Georg Hensch Neue Straße 20 D-31582 Nienburg 0049(0)5021-66236 www.hensch-geomantie.de


Deleted: no permission received via OTRS; ticket:2016070510007843 does not cover this painting. --Wdwd (talk) 19:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission by painter, painter alive Kvrzpvzrkz (talk) 07:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hier ist die Erlaubnis des Autors:

Von: Eike Hensch <eike.hensch@gmx.de> An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org Cc: Elmar Nolte <nolte@elnos.de> Datum: 5. Juli 2016 um 11:01 Betreff: Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)

Ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tetuan_1984.jpg

dass ich a) dessen Fotograf/in bin oder b) Inhaber/in des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts oder c) die Inhaberin / den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de). Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird. 05.07.2016 Eike Hensch -- Prof. Eike Georg Hensch Neue Straße 20 D-31582 Nienburg 0049(0)5021-66236 www.hensch-geomantie.de

Elmar Nolte (talk) 08:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission received via OTRS; ticket:2016070510007843 does not cover this painting. --Wdwd (talk) 19:55, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was uploaded as "own work" by w:fr:Utilisateur:Jesmar, whose user page indicates he is a man. So it is clearly not an authentic, properly licensed, properly-attributed signature of Lindsey Stirling, a woman. It may be inauthentic, or it may be (as claimed in a comment on French Wikipedia) copyrighted. Either way, it should be deleted. (Beyond the specifics, I am not sure it's a good idea to publish signatures of living people, given possible identity theft issues...but we can leave that for another discussion.) - Pete F (talk) 03:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: deleted the cc license and there is already a PD license. --Sanandros (talk) 20:59, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, appears to be a screenshot of a video —SpacemanSpiff 08:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SpacemanSpiff, This image was taken using the Nikon Coolpix L610 camera. This is a cropped version of the original image. Technical specifications cab be seen on the metadata section of the image's page. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards, S.Aravind

I did see the metadata but because of the texture it appeared to be a shot of a video to me. If I'm wrong then so be it and the DR will be closed that way. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 14:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And, to be sure, this is the Original Version of the image (external web page) - S.Aravind 14:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://static.wixstatic.com/media/99f0d0_841ad0d958d04a239c67b032e97db563.jpg/v1/fill/w_180,h_240,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/99f0d0_841ad0d958d04a239c67b032e97db563.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When searching via Google, I find this image in several instances on the German website www.powder-testing.com. I don't find it on any other website related to this topic. The original author of de:Scherdruckzylinder and uploader of the image is User:Pulveranalyse (German for "powder testing"), obviously a professional in this area, judging by the article contents. He included a link to www.power-testing.com in the original version of the article.
Altogether, it looks plausible to me that User:Pulveranalyse (probably named Daniel Moog) really is the original author of the picture, as he is working professionally with such devices and thus has the possibility to photograph them. --PM3 (talk) 16:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: used on different webpages; No evidence of authorship, no permission via OTRS. Deleted per COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 20:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Date seems incorrect. 1950 given here. Seems also not own work. Sonty (talk) 16:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De foto's in kwestie komen uit de collectie van het Zuiderzeemuseum ( zie http://beeldbank.cultureelerfgoed.nl/alle-afbeeldingen/?mode=gallery&view=horizontal&sort=random%7B1468655329965%7D%20asc&page=1&fq%5B%5D=search_s_head_collection:%22Collectie%20Zuiderzeemuseum%22&reverse=0 ) waar ze zijn vastgelegd als tussen 1920- 1930 gemaakt (later kan ook niet, wat na 1932 zorgde de afsluitdijk voor het stopzetten van de visserij in Harderwijk en Volendam). Het Zuiderzeemuseum heeft de rechten voor ansichtkaarten (die voor een deel ook op het Geheugen van Nederland staan) onderzocht en stelt de foto's onder creative commons licentie SA BY beschikbaar. De vermelde datum is de datum waarop de ansichtkaart werd gedigitaliseerd, dus het digitale beeld gemaakt. Linktoevoeger (talk) 07:54, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Dank voor de update. Met een datering van meer van dan 70 jaar geleden en een onbekende auteur, is de foto in orde om opgenomen te worden. Het fotobijschrift heb ik aangepast nav de Beeldbank van de RCE[2].
English: Photo info from given above source shows date before 1941 and unknown author. Description of the photo on Commons changed and deletion request removed by me.
Sonty (talk) 10:52, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  •  Delete Photographer is unknown, so there's no way to determine if the copyright holder has been deceased for 70 years as stated in the license. Diannaa (talk) 01:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep German copyright law applies; copyright law states: "Bei einem anonymen Werk erlischt (gemäß § 66 UrhG) aber das Urheberrecht siebzig Jahre nach Veröffentlichung. Ist das Werk 70 Jahre nach Schaffung noch nicht veröffentlicht, läuft die Schutzfrist 70 Jahre nach Schaffung ab." (My translation: "The copyright period of anonymous works expires (according to § 66 UrhG) seventy years after the work is made public. If the work hasn't been made public 70 years after creation, then the copyright protection period expires 70 years after creation.") Conclusion applied to this photograph: more than 70 years after creation there is no author known, and that name is unlikely to pop up. (I checked several databases of German archives, and NIOD). Anonymous work, published more than 70 years ago, so copyright has expired ("kein Urheberrecht, 70 Jahre nach Schaffung"). Perhaps the current license to this photograph needs to be corrected. Would the license Anonymous-EU be better fit for this photo? Vysotsky (talk) 10:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question Hello Vysotsky, what is the basis for your assumption that German copyright laws apply in this case? Because of the fact that the person in the picture is a German? I have a different point of view: The servers of Commons are located in the United States respectively in the Netherlands. Therefore, local laws apply where the file is hosted. Cheers, GeoTrinity (talk) 12:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC) // Schongarth was hanged exactly 70 yrs ago, btw. Cheers, GeoTrinity (talk) 12:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment You are right: US law also applies -after German law- because of the location of the Wikimedia servers. US Copyright Law: anonymous photograph, published between 1923 and 1963, copyright not renewed: copyright term of 28 years: USCode at Cornell.edu & EN-Wiki: 28 years (from publication) if copyright not renewed. As to Dutch copyright law: anonymous works: 70 years. (Art. 38 Nederlandse auteurswet). So, according to US, Dutch and German law, copyright of this photograph has expired. Vysotsky (talk) 12:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep convinced, keep it. GeoTrinity (talk) 12:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the photographer is unknown how do we know they've been dead for 70 years? The source webpage gives no copyright information either — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The reasons why this file is in the public domain according to US, German and Dutch copyright law are given in the earlier deletion request (above). You are right in one aspect, though: the licence should be changed, most likely to {{Anonymous-EU}}. Vysotsky (talk) 08:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This has now been fixed, so I now withdraw this nomination. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:26, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I am using this as a logo 43.231.59.205 05:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think this is is too simple and so Commons:TOO applies here.--Sanandros (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment before to claim about TOO, the first is to find the country of origin, in France no doubt that it would have been protected, in Germany likely not. So TOO mean all and mean nothing. After some research, it is the same logo as this svg Brazilian logo tagged as too old and below TOO,  Neutral as I don't know how is TOO in Brazil, nor there are infos on Commons about that, nor I really think it's a so old logo to be in PD. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos by Ildikó Neer

[edit]

The photos are not uploaded by the author originally. The files came from huwiki where user:M3peti was the uploader (see the original upload log of the third file). M3peti is a man (see his user page in huwiki), the author is a woman: Ildikó Neer professional photographer of Hungary. There are other five files which uploaded by M3peti in huwiki and was made by Ildikó Neer:

I wrote to M3peti but unfortunately he has been inactive user from Februar 2015. So I don't know how he got the photos. --Regasterios (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was it actually first published in India? Discasto talk 15:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Discasto: Ask the http://www.nehrumemorial.nic.in.--Sanandros (talk) 21:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Sanandros: No I don't it's me the one that must ask, but the one that claims it was published in India. --Discasto talk 10:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was it created by the UK government? Discasto talk 15:12, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alfaris88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that uploader created any of these images (including the seven in the collage). Various sizes, different white balances, odd file names and so on all suggest that these pictures are gathered from a variety of sources and claimed as own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I know this user, he is an old friend, I'm sure 100% he is the photographer and the owner of this photos, (1-2-3-4) photo taken from Almejarra co-workspace, he is the owner and founder of it, (5) this is his personal photo, (6-7- ...) he is a member of Resalla and take it by himself, the photos is bad quality because he use and old mobile phone, if you use google images search you will find it relete to Ahmed Faris --Ibrahim.ID 08:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: at least more than one of them depict Ahmet Faris, not sure how he could be the photographer of those files. --Jcb (talk) 11:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of photo = derivative work of unclear copyright statut Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:09, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can't follow your argumentation. The user states 'own work'. So it could be an analogue photo out of the times when digital cameras where still not common.--Sanandros (talk) 21:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's however easy, a photo of a photo is a derivative of the first (oldest) photo and there is a copyright violation unless the oldest photo have already been published with a free license, or it is in PD for some reasons (then it lacks a valid PD tag), or the copyright owner of the oldest photo send a permission to OTRS, or indeed the uploader have taken the photo. But usually, here in Commons, this kind of derivative tagged with "own works" are often copyright violation, because in most cases the uploader is not the photographer of the older photo, that's all. It's more me who can't follow you @Sanandros: , the user said "The original photograph was clicked by my maternal grandfather. ", this is not an "own work" and I'm not aware of a policy that allow us to upload family photos. I said "derivative work of unclear copyright statut", apparently, I was right...Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This picture was clicked with my smartphone. The original photograph was clicked by my maternal grandfather. And I assure you I've included this image on his request.I don't think anyone should have problem with that.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anmol Pagaria (talk • contribs)

@Anmol Pagaria: Does your grandfather has a mail Account? It would be good if he sends the permission to publish that photo or of that scan under CC-BY-SA-4.0 to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. If he doesn't have an mail account then he should write a letter and sign it and you scan this letter and send it also to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. This is needed because your grandfather could theoretically sue wikimedia and we can't prove that he gave the permission.--Sanandros (talk) 09:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]