Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_for_"Tohoshinki_Live_Tour_2013_～TIME～".jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_(20776453082).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Creek_BC.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal art, out of project scope. ★ Poké95 02:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. ~riley (talk) 03:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal art, out of project scope. ★ Poké95 02:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File:Anna Bell Peaks at AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2016 (25545754132).jpg Ghkldsada (talk) 08:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. ★ Poké95 08:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Anna Bell Peaks at AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2016 (25545754132).jpg 85.11.164.207 22:07, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept, No reason given for deletion. No obvious problem regarding copyright or scope. Thuresson (talk) 23:23, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (msg) 19:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 11:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: This file has a description of a person, and is not a file at all. Hence, it is out of scope of the "File:" namespace and should either be part of the "User:" namespace or should be moved to another wiki as commons is only for files. AbdealiJK (talk) 11:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ansel Elgort said on Twitter that he doesn't like this photo Janedoe89001 (talk) 00:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep COM:INUSE --Stefan2 (talk) 08:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Queryzo (talk) 14:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep: (speedy) as above. ~riley (talk) 15:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
empty file Ritarisk (talk) 06:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Delete: Malformed SVG with missing embedded raster. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: No need to wait normal duration on this one. ~riley (talk) 15:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
not wanted 87.102.103.187 08:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep DR not wanted, file in scope. Tm (talk) 11:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
not wanted 87.102.103.187 08:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Second nomination by same IP as vandalism, that cant articulate nothing more that three words. File in scope --Tm (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
This file was initially tagged by FunkMonk as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Looks like a screenshot. Stifle (talk) 08:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Furthermore, uploader seems to be a vandalism only account (here and on English Wikipedia). FunkMonk (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Looks like taken from non-free materials (photo of TV image probably) --Kocio (talk) 20:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed, it has been taken from a TV image, if this means it is non-tree, then let it delete. Happa (talk) 22:00, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete If taken from a TV image, then it is a copyright violation. --Stefan2 (talk) 08:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
Out of scope images.
Might be used for a cross-wiki vandalism?
Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload 14.161.46.32 10:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This picture seems to be copyvio,and the uploader is a spam-only user at zhwp。All of the picture from the uploader is ADVERT for a person 就是他 ☞ Q 「祝我考試順利」「有事請留言」 11:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Gallery in File namespace. File namespace is meant for files, and not for galleries. AbdealiJK (talk) 11:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suncoast Health Brands (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at enwiki.
- File:ProCharge - 5 Original Flavors.png
- File:40g Protein Per Bottle - All BCAAs - 0 Carbs-Fat-Sugars.png
Gunnex (talk) 11:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Promotional username, account blocked as well. ~riley (talk) 15:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Carooza classifieds). MER-C 11:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Promotional account blocked. ~riley (talk) 15:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ibcgrouppr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam (w:Special:Undelete/Draft:IBC group).
- File:Ibc company logo.png
- File:Marketing 2 .png
- File:Marketing 1.png
- File:Ibcg .png
- File:IBC company logo.png
Deleted: Account blocked as an inappropriate username and contributions handled. ~riley (talk) 15:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
illegal license Tuandiep1 (talk) 10:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
illegal license Tuandiep1 (talk) 10:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
illegal license Tuandiep1 (talk) 10:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This file is actually subtitles for a video. This should be in the namespace TimedText, not in the namespace of File. In fact there is already TimedText:Wikimedia_Chapters_Dialogue.webmhd.webm.en.srt and TimedText:Wikimedia_Chapters_Dialogue.webmhd.webm.fr.srt which have the translations for those languages AbdealiJK (talk) 13:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- You may see User_talk:Jean-Frédéric#File:Wikimedia_Chapters_Dialogue.webmhd.webm.2Fsrt_and_subpages for the reasons of the existence of that page. As also mentionned here, it is fine to delete it. Jean-Fred (talk) 13:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jean-Fred (talk) 13:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be a screen shot of a game. The claim that it is the uploader's own work is implausible. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Al-Zoya Pvt Ltd.). MER-C 12:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 16:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
advertisement material Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 17:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Nonsensical PD rationale. Obviously a modern photo, published in a book in 1979. No reason to think that the photographer has been dead for more than 100 years. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. ~riley (talk) 18:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Ya existe un logo de Ecuavisa en Wikimedia Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ALogo_Ecuavisa.svg, la cual se irá actualizando con los nuevos logos del canal del Ecuador. KOVOX90 19:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: en uso / in use. --Jcb (talk) 19:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jcb the file is not in use. Check again. --✎KOVOX90 02:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Ya existe un logo de Ecuavisa en Wikimedia Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ALogo_Ecuavisa.svg, la cual se irá actualizando con los nuevos logos del canal del Ecuador. ✎KOVOX90 02:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Usage was removed by you, that is not an effective way to support your point - Jcb (talk) 22:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: don't game the system please. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Falsch hochgeladen, war für Naturwettbewerb bestimmt DerSchlangen (talk) 19:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation week
Falsch hochgeladen, war für Naturwettbewerb bestimmt DerSchlangen (talk) 19:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation week
I tagged the file {{Wrong license}} per http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions#May_I_use_the_Creative_Commons_logo_and_buttons.3F and the uploader reverted! I told the uploader, File:Creative commons license spectrum.svg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page. But the user did not explain why on the file description page. Instead, I was asked questions that the above answered. I gave the user another chance, but I think more eyes/views are needed. Consensus. Carl has said that some of the CC logos may meet the ToO, and thus not be PD, too. I can't fix the licensing issue because I'm not sure the logos are all PD either - I'm not prepared to go out on a limb and claim ToO is not met for any of them. So I'm nominating it - if no one is willing to fix the licensing issue, the file needs to be deleted. (And if it's to be kept, there are the other issues noted - regarding sourcing and trademark - that need to be fixed in order for it to be properly kept.) Discussion so far was on the user's talk page or in edit summaries. It should continue here. --Elvey (talk) 21:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: There is a previous discussion related to the CC icons like this DR opened by you, and closed by Denniss as Trolling. The CC icons themselves seems too simple to meet the TOO, therefore, the {{PD-textlogo}} is correct, and this was decided with borad concensus. Therefore, I'll request its full protection --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn. edit conflict. Licensing was fixed right before I opened the DR. Please AGF. --Elvey (talk) 02:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Source is still questionable, but I don't know that we delete for poor sourcing. --Elvey (talk) 02:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- source is not at all questionable. the material was taken from the link. On the greater topic, the license of the CC logos, did someone got into contact with the legal department of CC for their strange license / policy wording page? I can't believe that this blocking of our use is intended, I guess this was just poor wording for trademark protection reasons. Shaddim (talk) 09:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- "But the user did not explain why on the file description page" I indeed responded, very well and fast. But I was highly confused by your handling of the situation. You claimed things which are clearly not consensus positions and you didn't provided appropriate links to policies and discussions. Shaddim (talk) 09:53, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Strong keep: obviously below threshold of originality. Also, most likely intended usage, not putting the logos in a "misrepresenting light". Shaddim (talk) 09:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Susanne Hammerle is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep OTRS-ticket received and processed. Josve05a (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept, Taivo (talk) 07:36, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
You are not copyright holder of Mexican parliament logo. Works of Mexican government are protected with copyright for 100 years. Taivo (talk) 17:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- So, {{PD-Coa-Mexico}} and {{PD-MX-exempt}} does not apply? Why? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept, thank you, user:Amitie 10g. I added this into Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Mexico. The file is very small, but I did not find a replacement image. Taivo (talk) 07:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope file (has some sort of description, no file) AbdealiJK (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. John Vandenberg (chat) 08:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Historic painting, uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder of this work. Diannaa (talk) 22:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Thi2014
Its my personal picture and I don't want it to published online.It should be deleted immediately. I will be grateful. Regards, Hamza Khanzada1122334455667788 (talk) 19:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: If you didn't want it published online, why on earth did you publish it online? Anyway, it is a likely copyright violation (the photographer is probably the copyright holder), so it will be deleted on copyright grounds. --Storkk (talk) 20:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alarmante Music (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:Reuniao.jpg
- File:Alarmante 3.gif
- File:Alarmante 2.gif
- File:Alarmante.jpg
- File:Alarmante.gif
- File:Mix 2.gif
- File:Mix.gif
- File:Ps 2.jpg
- File:Elx Family.jpg
- File:Elx Femely.jpg
- File:Alarmante Music.gif
- File:DMX.gif
INeverCry 01:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 02:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 8 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 8 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 8 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
投稿する際に、不慣れなために、うまく作成できなかったことと、写真自体も、少し修正が必要なことがわかったためです。 IMZANIROH (talk) 20:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing source as of 8 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Ich möchte mein Bild nicht mehr hier haben bzw. ich möchte nicht mehr am Wettbewerb teilnehmen! Löscht es bitte wieder
Thats my picture and I dont want it to be here and I dont want to be part of that competition anymore,thanks.
Smoothwaves (talk) 19:10, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Info deletion request by author only a few minutes after upload (<7 days), file not used. Holger1959 (talk) 10:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Ich möchte mein Bild nicht mehr hier haben bzw. ich möchte nicht mehr am Wettbewerb teilnehmen! Löscht es bitte wieder Thats my picture and I dont want it to be here and I dont want to be part of that competition anymore,thanks. Smoothwaves (talk) 17:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:Courtesy deletion requested shortly after upload. Unused. Unfortunate, but I will honor the request. --Storkk (talk) 13:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no exif, probably not own work. Similar to File:Albatross maritime.jpg from the same user. Rodrigolopes (talk) 00:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unusable poor quality, numerous better ones at Category:Otariidae. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:37, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manoj Asya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 01:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 01:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 01:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 01:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
It's not their own work, the logo is copyrighted by Fundación Miss Ecuador. Edjoerv (talk) 01:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:sCOPE ~riley (talk) 01:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
I can find no indication on the source website http://bryozoa.net/cheilostomata/arachnopusiidae/aracuni.html that this material has been released into the public domain or under a compatible license. Diannaa (talk) 02:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 02:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:49, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cobanxirfan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 02:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This appears to be a publicity image without a release, I haven't found any images predating local upload but this article seems to suggest that it's a publicity image from a video. Unless the true source/license is known this should be deleted —SpacemanSpiff 02:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 03:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:My Dreams.jpg
- File:Vincenzo Crimaco 2.jpg
- File:Vincenzo crimaco suona.jpg
- File:Vincenzo Crimaco.jpg
INeverCry 03:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
INeverCry 03:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PHPDevelopment12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 03:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ZehraKaraq (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 03:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
INeverCry 03:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aymen belli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 03:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 03:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation; imdb image from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1144187/ Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope.
- File:Sea.PNG
- File:Self Respect.PNG
- File:HO9JA TM BRAND COMPANY.png
- File:Ho9ja Shirt.PNG
- File:TM Logo.PNG
- File:Ho9ja TM.jpg
★ Poké95 04:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertising. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Comes from Facebook, see metadata. It contains the string "FBMD". Also out of project scope. ★ Poké95 04:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo. ★ Poké95 04:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Theu virjilio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. (Wikipedia Zero upload).
Gunnex (talk) 05:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Othmaneraja (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. (Wikipedia Zero upload).
- File:Next match.png
- File:Wydad-Raja.png
- File:AjaSupps.png
- File:MATCH DAY.jpg
- File:OTHMANE HARROUCH Raja.png
- File:ALdirbi.gif
- File:فوكوطريما.jpg
- File:GUEVATISTA2.png
- File:شعار-جيفريسطا.png
- File:GUEVARISTA1.png
- File:GUEVARISTA.png
- File:Zinadawdiya123.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 05:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Othmaneraja (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images/logos/etc
- File:Othmane harouch1.png
- File:Présentation1.png
- File:LogodlamGIF.gif
- File:AYOUUB.gif
- File:Anigif2 Othmane harrouch.gif
- File:الإنسان المتمرد البير كامو.pdf
- File:Peligro Dlam.gif
- File:AYOUB PELIGRO.gif
- File:Othmane harrouch3.png
- File:Othmane harrouch2.png
- File:Othmane harrouch.jpg
- File:Othmane harrouch1.jpg
- File:Othpmaneportrait-7atim3.png
- File:Othpmaneportrait-7atim3à.png
- File:Personnalité-politique1.png
- File:Othpmaneportrait-7atim.png
- File:OTHMNANEK.png
- File:Capture2016G.png
- File:نتنتللريبب.png
- File:Carteothmane.png
- File:عثمان حرووش.png
- File:Card7atim.jpg
- File:Othmanecard.png
- File:CARDZ othmane harrouch.png
- File:Carte othmane harrouch.png
- File:Club athletic.png
- File:Ayoub.png
- File:CARTECLUB.png
- File:COVERTURE.jpg
- File:DLAM.png
- File:سلا،قرية اولاد موسى7.png
- File:سلا،قرية اولاد موسى.png
- File:CARDHATIM.png
- File:T-shirt-template.png
- File:عثمان حروش يتمنى لكم رمضان مبارك سعيد.png
- File:RCA VS IRT.png
- File:رمضان كريم.png
- File:Mpmpmpp.png
- File:Yassin.png
- File:CNHAMZA.png
- File:LHLALI.png
- File:OKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK.png
- File:06جيفاريسطا.png
- File:05جيفاريسطا.png
- File:04جيفاريسطا.png
- File:جيفاريسطا.png
- File:02جيفاريسطا.png
- File:03جيفاريسطا.png
- File:PELIGRO.png
- File:نادي التعاون.png
- File:Ahmed ghalhom.png
INeverCry 04:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:54, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. (Wikipedia Zero upload). Gunnex (talk) 05:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Big boy malonza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, mysterious watermarks, different photographers ("Paul Mboya", "MARTIN BRIGHTWIL"), per FBMD... also grabbed from Facebook + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload).
- File:NJGSTUDIOS.JPG
- File:Mike njg.JPG
- File:Njg Records.jpg
- File:Badkampany perform.jpg
- File:Badkampany pic.jpg
- File:BADKAMPANY.jpg
- File:Badkampany.jpg
- File:Bagz and betty.JPG
Gunnex (talk) 06:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zaouali1930 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... also grabbed from Facebook. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.
Gunnex (talk) 06:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Uploaded on 08.05.2016 for pt:Teresa Garcia (jornalista), a Brazilian journalist. Considering also Instagram user pic via https://www.instagram.com/teresagarcia100/ = https://instagram.ftxl1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/t51.2885-19/s150x150/11417254_410790122440304_693860087_a.jpg (last modified: 2015) Gunnex (talk) 06:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 06:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=256298214528792&set=a.110818879076727.20516.100004458461951&type=3&theater (2013). Gunnex (talk) 06:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE: Educationally useful? Easily able to be converted to wikitext. ~riley (talk) 07:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 07:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 07:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
_for_%22Tohoshinki_Live_Tour_2013_%EF%BD%9ETIME%EF%BD%9E%22.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_for_%22Tohoshinki_Live_Tour_2013_%EF%BD%9ETIME%EF%BD%9E%22.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Due to the poster on the truck, this is an unacceptable derivative work. — ξxplicit 07:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:TOYS. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mrs.MaddenScience (talk · contribs)
[edit]
~riley (talk) 07:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. (Wikipedia Zero upload). Gunnex (talk) 07:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Veraltetes Logo - dieses Logo wird nicht mehr verwendet 188.73.126.122 07:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Porque no es el archivo correcto. Escribimos desde la dirección de comunicación de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Urjcsocial (talk) 07:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep in use. --Leyo 08:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. (Wikipedia Zero upload). Gunnex (talk) 07:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work - this is the users only contri to commons and has no exif Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio from http://fcutrecht.nl/nieuws/actueel/12134/fc-utrecht-historie-seizoen-1986-1987. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashmoross16 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
An unsued "personal" file. All files must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Anarchyte (talk) 07:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Nonsense PD rationale: "Photo of aircraft for advertisment by manufacturer, no copyright exists"... no evidence that a search has been undertaken to ascertain whether it was published with no notice, or was not renewed. Storkk (talk) 07:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/Draft:ITG7 - software company). MER-C 08:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
File doesn't show any realistic educational purposes. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sparta2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]See COM:SCOPE.
Stefan2 (talk) 08:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Personal photo used in deleted autobio page. JohnCD (talk) 08:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Vanity, self promotion. And see these three queries [1] [2] [3] Ks [在这里找到答案] 10:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC).
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ywhan_Alykhandrw.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ywhan_Alykhandrw_Firnandiz.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ywhan_alykhandrw_firnanidiz.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Very blurry, place and plants are unidentified. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unsharp. There are better photos of this species in Category:Heteropoda venatoria. Mhohner (talk) 10:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete per nominator. Stas (talk) 18:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unsharp. There are better photos of this species in Category:Heteropoda venatoria. Mhohner (talk) 10:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
The image is too blurry to be useful. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baziliodacosta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used.
- File:Simples como a Água.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 22.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 21.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 20.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 19.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 18.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 17.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 16.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 15.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 14.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 13.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 12.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 11.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 10.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 9.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 8.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 7.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17 2.jpg
- File:Elenco da Sala 17.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 10:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ali ahmadijan (talk · contribs)
[edit]I strongly doubt these images are own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, the professionnal quality, the subject and the copyvio record of the uploader.
- File:میلاد آزاد و منصور لولاور و شهرزاد علیمحمدی.jpg
- File:میلاد آزاد 9.jpg
- File:Mirtaher mazlomi.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 11:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ali ahmadijan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, private images
BrightRaven (talk) 11:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UNNIKRISHNAN KAMAL SADHAN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, Out of scope, commons is not a photo album. The only files uploaded to commons
- File:Unnishivapal - 12 unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.jpg
- File:Unnishivapal - 13 , unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.JPG
- File:Unnishivapal - 14, unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.JPG
- File:Unnishivapal - 15 , unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.jpg
- File:Unnishivapal -- 16 , unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.jpg
- File:Unnishivapal - 17 ,unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.jpg
- File:Unnishivapal - 18, unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.jpg
- File:Unnishivapal - 20 unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.jpg
- File:Unnishivapal -- 19 unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.jpg
- File:Unnishivapal - 21 unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.jpg
- File:Unnishivapal 23 unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.JPG
- File:Unnishivapal - 24 unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.JPG
- File:Unnishivapal -11 unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.jpg
- File:Unni shivapal 10 unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.PNG
- File:Unni shivapal 9 unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.PNG
- File:Unni shivapal 8 unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.JPG
- File:Unni shivapal 7 unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.JPG
- File:Unnishivapal unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.JPG
- File:Unnishivapal6 - unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.JPG
- File:Unni shivapal - unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.PNG
- File:Unni shivapal 2, unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.JPG
- File:Unnishivapal 3 - unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.PNG
- File:Unni shivapal, UNNI SHIVAPAL FILM ACTOR - UNNISIVAPAL, UNNISHIVAPAL, UNNI SIVAPAL.JPG
Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Persnal ohoto used in deleted autobio page en:Faris kazrod JohnCD (talk) 11:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 12:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Used in deleted en:Monique lynn beauty blogger. JohnCD (talk) 12:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope, Arbitrary rant instead of file. AbdealiJK (talk) 12:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE, copyvio http://www.rontaler.ch/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/andre%CC%81-schnitzel.png Nolispanmo 13:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:HOMEFURNITZ).
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Credance2014 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Credance2014/sandbox).
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
look like kind of a joke. The description says: he is playing with dolls. -- Geagea (talk) 13:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
{{delete|wrong logo}} Deutschegolfliga2016 (talk) 14:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: promotional logo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Parasharshweta1992 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web (especially the book covers). Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.
- File:Padma Shri Awarded to Mr. S.L. Gupta.jpg
- File:First book published by S.Chand.jpg
- File:512Mstwe0eL.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The map does not look like own worl. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC) i made this map by print screen in my google account and crop, edit by myself user: Giaosuquay
Deleted: per nomination, based on Google Maps. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, found at http://www.kvip.com.vn/m/9 Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yuki Sasaki42 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. Historical photos (2x) may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.
- File:Ojpfyumbime52fetygbi.jpg
- File:3D-printer-SLM-Solutions-SLM-280-HL-2.jpg
- File:Pic slm 125.jpg
- File:A v4n8 img 2.jpg
- File:A06 v4n8 img 2.jpg
- File:3ig51053.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zurken Machines (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Zurken Machines).
- File:Mr. AD Singh Managing Director.png
- File:Mr.KD Singh Executive Director (Zurken ).png
- File:ZMC ISO.pdf
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.lapromollanera.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ali-cabello-la-promo-llanera.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
I think this diagram summarizes many others I have found on literature, and the other diagram on top is inaccurate/outdated. See the review from Doherty at the MRS bulletin (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157313000562), or in Schirhagl (http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103659), or in this talk by Degen at 17:45 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAqGDOk5Sl4). Brunolucatto (talk) 9 May 2016 14:58 (UTC)
I just noticed this was uploaded twice and this is not being used. This one should be deleted. Brunolucatto (talk) 9 May 2016 15:08 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Brunolucatto. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jhon Jairo Rendon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Jhon Jairo Rendon Arteaga Hormigas 2.jpg
- File:Hormigas Jhon Jairo Rendon Arteaga.jpg
- File:Jhon Jairo Rendon Arteaga.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. Crop of a 12 May 1987 newspaper advertisement asking for leniency for a convicted murderer. Cropped version bears a watermark of the National Taiwan University College of Law. Very unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Rrburke (talk) 15:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Overexposed beyond recoverable. Mhohner (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- I agree.--Brunei (talk) 21:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file ~riley (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file ~riley (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file ~riley (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file ~riley (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Table. Can be done without using media file. Out of Project scope. -- Geagea (talk) 15:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely "own work"/CC by Flickr user "Gamerscore Blog", considering screenshot from video game en:Age of Empires, developed and copyrighted by "Microsoft Studios". Gunnex (talk) 15:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed. Even original (probalby screenshot author) release it under compatibile open license on Commons it is not free as the original game is not free and thus even the screenshot canot be free. Just and authors missunderstanding of copyright.--Juandev (talk) 05:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
imho rather 'posing', file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 17:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Not "Own work". https://yt3.ggpht.com/-6-7ZX0CImV4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/BQwoxGpmywo/s900-c-k-no-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg Claudia Montanari in YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/montanariclaudia Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bilguunee95 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private web hoster. No educational purpose. Uploaded since 02.2016 exclusively for en:User:Bilguunee95 (abandoned since 03.2016, tagged with speedy now). File like File:Ad hoc1.png + File:Ap ajillagaa.jpg etc. most likely not own works.
- File:Radiusaaa.png
- File:Гггу.png
- File:Нбйыб.png
- File:Эцуцйу.png
- File:Жфж.png
- File:Уцфффффф.png
- File:Ццйбйыбый.png
- File:Qqq .png
- File:Бйыбыйбыййыбйы.png
- File:Бйрйб.png
- File:Лабйыбйыб.png
- File:Зурагйыйбйыб.png
- File:Zurag2aa.png
- File:1deh.png
- File:Wpa.png
- File:Codeasdasd.png
- File:Цццццццццццццццццццццццццццццццццйййб.png
- File:Хаха.png
- File:Ойойой.png
- File:Фффффффффццуфцуцфй.png
- File:Werewrwere.png
- File:Easafsafsf.png
- File:Kkkkkkkkkkasd.png
- File:Aireplay-ng.png
- File:Sharedkey.png
- File:WEP hack.png
- File:Wep.png
- File:Sa310.png
- File:Iwc.png
- File:Macchanger 1.png
- File:Macchanger.png
- File:Zuraga.png
- File:Aireplay.png
- File:Zurag12.png
- File:Zurag22.png
- File:Bssid.png
- File:Airodump12.png
- File:Data2.png
- File:Wireshark2.png
- File:Iwconfig.png
- File:Kali-linux1.png
- File:Kali-linux.png
- File:Ad hoc1.png
- File:Wireless-Cards-Side-by-Side.jpg
- File:Ap ajillagaa.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 18:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 18:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
i dont like this page Khanzada1122334455667788 (talk) 18:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Its my personal picture and I don't want it to published online.It should be deleted immediately I will be grateful. Regards, Hamza Khanzada1122334455667788 (talk) 19:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hammad5025 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload).
Gunnex (talk) 19:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 20:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Taken directly from the swissnex Boston website (See this) with no apparent release under a license compatiable with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 20:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused duplicate of File:Zoya, folk singer-songwriter .jpg Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
_(20776453082).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20776453082).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
there is a better version in wikimedia commons: File:Guide to hardy fruits and ornamentals (1903) (14787249143).jpg Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 20:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
_(14787249143).jpg){kind=link}
_(20776453082).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
_(20776453082).jpg){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Shan State National Army.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
promotional-only. includes promotional text and link to company. name uploader is name company. Takeaway (talk) 23:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Extremely low quality. Much better photos of this car at Category:Peugeot 504 sedan. OSX (talk • contributions) 23:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
self-created artwork Takeaway (talk) 23:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Promotional an unlikely to ever be used Takeaway (talk) 23:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
promotional and unlikely to ever be used in a project Takeaway (talk) 23:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlexandrosCoy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-created artwork. Of no educational use.
- File:Chaka en el Srta Mw Colo,bia.PNG
- File:Chaka posando para Hola! Thailand.PNG
- File:Chaka Khang Recien coronada.PNG
Takeaway (talk) 23:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
promotional Takeaway (talk) 23:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Medusasmakeup (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional
Takeaway (talk) 23:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Strakhov (talk) 23:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Promotional. Takeaway (talk) 23:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
It portrays David Koresh, not anyone named Gordy Jr. It is also being used as part of persistent vandalism at the article for Redfoo. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Failed license review. No sign that the website licenses any of its contents under a free license. (The bare URL is also a lower res version of the upload, but that's secondary.) The "own work" license is unlikely, given the photographer attribution. czar 03:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Since Other file uploaded by same person was from imdb, and listed as "own work" and this photo is very unlilkely to be own work unless uploader is about 100 years old this is a presumptive copyright violation Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Since this user has uploaded multiple works as "own work" for which this appears incredibly unlikely, this requires some major specificity as to how the user owns this copyrighted work. This should be assumes a copyright violation in its absence. Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
I think Liverpool Football Club logo is copyrighted UAwiki (talk) 06:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: In any case, not own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Probadly grabbed from Facebook considering exif: FBMD01000a860d0000b94a000090790000e77e00005d840000d395000008d50000d8e90000def0000035fb000000a60100.--Liji (talk) 19:50, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. IT related uploads (drawings, designs, screenshots, photos etc.), uploaded in a row on 07./08.03.2016 and used for mn:Утасгүй цэнэглэгч/Inductive charging). Multiple copyright issues to solve.
- File:Jisdfg.png
- File:Tomsdfghn.png
- File:Wireless-charging-ppt-34-638.jpg
- File:Futurelijtb.png
- File:Wireless-charging-ppt-38-638.jpg
- File:Olon.png
- File:Apri.png
- File:Wireless-charging-ppt-39-638.jpg
- File:Wireless-charging-ppt-40-638.jpg
- File:Shem.png
- File:Ghfgujk.png
- File:Mashin.jpg
- File:Ajillgaa.jpg
- File:Wqer.jpg
- File:Wertyu.jpg
- File:Gdghjk.jpg
- File:Qwert.png
- File:Tyui.png
- File:Thjklllllll.png
- File:Ruuu.jpg
- File:Gtb.png
- File:Wireless-charging-11-638.jpg
- File:Зэс ороомог.png
- File:Wireless-charging-ppt-3-638.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 09:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Photo of copyrighted artwork. —Andrei S. Talk 09:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, permission required from both sculptor and photographer. Sculptor should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
miss upload Tuandiep1 (talk) 11:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree software. ~riley (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Screenshot of Photoshop software. don't think it qualify as {{PD-simple}}. -- Geagea (talk) 15:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - derivative of copyrighted UI. --Storkk (talk) 09:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Felipereyb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, also per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Felipereyb. Photos of photos (examples: File:Con el Secretario General de Naciones Unidas Embajador Javier Pérez de Cuellar.jpg + File:Con el Presidente Andrés Rodríguez del Paraguay2.jpg), mostly derived on 07.03.2016 with different digicams from an unknown archive with unknown copyright status and uploaded some hours later. All files related to es:Luzmila Zanabria Ishikawa, a Peruvian diplomat (most likely for election spam). Mostly historical images, taken in several countries + Antarctic. Multiple copyright issues to solve.
- File:Luzmila Zanabria al Parlamento Andino con el 2.png
- File:Luzmila Zanabria al parlamento andino 2.png
- File:Agradeciendo al recibir la Condecoración Al Mérito Gran Cruz, al Presidente de Portugal Aníbal Cavaco..jpg
- File:Recibiendo Homenaje de la Sociedad de Beneficencia Peruana en Bolivia.jpg
- File:Con el Canciller de Bolivia celebrando el 28 de Julio.jpg
- File:Plantando el árbol de la amistad con el Alcalde de El Alto, Bolivia.jpg
- File:Ceremonia por el Aniversario de la Independencia del Perú.jpg
- File:Honores Militares La Paz -Bolivia.jpg
- File:Con el Presidente Carlos Meza de Bolivia.jpg
- File:Jornadas Ayacuchanas Congreso de la República2.jpg
- File:Jornadas Ayacuchanas Congreso de la República1.jpg
- File:Con el Secretario General de Naciones Unidas Embajador Javier Pérez de Cuellar.jpg
- File:Con los niños y niñas de la Escuela Perú Beijing.jpg
- File:Izando la bandera peruana en la base Machu Picchu en la Antártida.jpg
- File:Con el Presidente Andrés Rodríguez del Paraguay2.jpg
- File:Con el Presidente Andrés Rodríguez del Paraguay .jpg
- File:Condecoración con el Aguila Azteca por el Embajador de México en el Japón.jpg
- File:Luzlima Zanabria.jpg
- File:Luzmila Zanabria al Parlamento Andino 2.png
Gunnex (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Jérémy labourel
[edit]These photos contain copyrighted works, for example official Peugeot press photos edited onto a background. OSX (talk • contributions) 23:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: (procedural keep) none of the files were tagged by {{Delete}}. Mass DR now opened. @OSX: please use COM:VFC in the future to ensure propper tagging occurs. Storkk (talk) 09:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Promotional. Unlikely to ever be used in a project.
- File:BabySoftDay-Post-2.jpg
- File:EDP Fabulous.jpg
- File:BabySoftDay-Post-1.jpg
- File:LovesBabySoftDayCover.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 23:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. Product shots would be nice, but these are marred by advertising. --Storkk (talk) 09:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/d5/8e/9b/d58e9ba70d932ae4ced14d87da361bc6.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence of permission at source, and also available at http://www.fav-club.com/2015/10/21/el-helicoptero-sikorsky-ah-60l-arpia-iv-de-la-fuerza-aerea-colombiana/ where it is credited to the colombian air force B50006 (talk) 16:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Available at www.fav-club.com/2015/10/21/el-helicoptero-sikorsky-ah-60l-arpia-iv-de-la-fuerza-aerea-colombiana/ prior to uploading, so very doubtful own work B50006 (talk) 16:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Screenshot with unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started as imho doubtful copyright issues: source and author "Mysore University", Roland zh (talk) 17:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission from Mysore University. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': imho seems a 'snap' from an unknown source, and EXIF data are missing, Roland zh (talk) 17:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:MYSORE TRADITIONAL ART SARASWATI.jpg: imho doubtful 'own work', Roland zh (talk) 18:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Likely copyvio (non-free logo). No evidence of permission. kashmiri 19:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 20:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: "small photo without metadata" is no valid reason for deletion, photo not found elsewhere on the internet. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Fair Use Laws. This says that it is a free image, although the original description said this is a non-free image. Abequinn14 (talk) 22:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Proof? I don't see anything non-free here; everything depicted in the screenshot is covered under a free license. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per Amitie10g. Compatible license. P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:39, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Na žádost autora u mě v diskusi. OJJ (talk) 12:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo with issues. --Basvb (talk) 16:08, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Passfotos werden von Fotografen gemacht, hier ist jedoch keiner genannt und keine fREIGABE VON EINEM SOLCHEN ZU SEHEN: Jbergner (talk) 04:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: doubtfull permission. --Basvb (talk) 16:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
no FoP in France Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: sadly. --Basvb (talk) 16:09, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted. No freedom of panorama in France 77.153.207.22 13:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: sadly no FOP in France. --Basvb (talk) 17:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Wrong file name with typo. SSYoung (talk) 14:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by other admin. --Basvb (talk) 17:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.mayska.de/s/cc_images/cache_3307756.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: author also different from user name. --Basvb (talk) 17:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 17:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Dfursero
[edit]- File:Robert Menzies Portrait.jpg
- File:Menzies, Privy Counsellor, 1937.jpg
- File:Menzies 1977.png
- File:Robert and Pattie Menzies.jpg
- File:Menzies funeral.jpg
- File:Lord Warden of Clinque Ports.jpg
- File:Image 005 - Dr Sukarno receives Prime Minister Menzies at the Istana Negara, 1959 tcm48-63609.jpg
- File:Menzies with Japan PM, 1957.jpg
- File:Menzies Funeral, Scots Church, 1978.jpg
- File:Menzies, Federal Attorney-General, 1935.jpg
- File:1968 RGM portrait by Godfrey Argent.jpg
- File:Menzies Family, 1936.jpg
- File:Menzies, Lord Warden of Clinque Ports, 1965.jpg
- File:Queen Presents Order of Australia, 1977.jpg
- File:Re-election of Menzies as PM, 1949.jpg
- File:Formation of Liberal Party, 1944.jpg
- File:Election to Victorian Parliament, 1928.jpg
- File:Robert Menzies, Aged 12.jpg
- File:Robert Menzies, Admission to Victorian Bar, 1918.jpg
User:Dfursero cannot possibly be the copyright holder of all of these works. I think that it's a good-faith error when transferring files from enwiki. --Orthogonal1 (talk) 00:12, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hassan Rouhani in 2016
[edit]Fails {{Tasnim}} license review: no listed photographer, so not Tasnim staff and thus not subject to Tasnim license. (Used as fair use on their website.) Would need to be licensed and uploaded through its official source
- File:President Rouhani and his cabinet tributes to Ruhollah Khomeini.jpg
- File:President Rouhani tributes to former president, Mohammad-Ali Rajai.jpg
- File:President Rouhani tributes to Tehrani Moqadam.jpg
- File:President Rouhani tributes to war hero, Mostafa Chamran.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Fails {{Tasnim}} license review: listed photographer is not Tasnim staff and thus not subject to Tasnim license. Would need to be licensed and uploaded through its official source (president.ir) czar 03:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Failed license review. Can't verify the contents of Kretschmann1.jpg in the archived source, though other images load just fine. czar 03:35, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Failed license review. Cannot verify image's contents at archived version of website, though there is a broken file by a similar name. Secondarily, I can't tell from Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Korea_.28South.29 whether there would be an architectural FoP issue too. czar 03:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Entirely superseded by File:Gadsden, AL - Perspective Map - 1887.jpg. Despite this file's filename, it is the same 1887 perspective map. This is just an extremely low resolution gif version. There is no use of this file or reason to keep it. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 04:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdelali19 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook (Wikipedia Zero upload). All files uploaded in a row on 08.05.2016. Examples: File:Souffrance d'eau.jpg --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/hamsnews/photos/a.1425555444406637.1073741828.1424925414469640/1525195177775996/?type=1&theater (02.2016) or File:Un jeune garçon portant un géant navet.jpg --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/hamsnews/photos/a.1425555444406637.1073741828.1424925414469640/1546320985663415/?type=1&theater (04.2016).
- File:Père et sa fille au région de l'ATLAS.jpg
- File:Souffrance d'eau.jpg
- File:Souffrance des enfants habitants des montagnes d'atlas avec le froid.jpg
- File:Une veille femme portant sur sont dos une bouteille de gaz.jpg
- File:Un jeune garçon portant un géant navet.jpg
- File:Visu 639x200 bibiliotheque.jpg
- File:Table du petit déjeuné.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 05:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama for modern sculptures in Russia Ymblanter (talk) 07:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The posters are the main subject in this photo, but there is no freedom of panorama in Japan for artworks. — ξxplicit 07:20, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Looks to be a screencap to me - probable copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
PD-because: " I, the uploader, received written consent from the author to use this image as I see fit" - this must be verified by COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 07:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
PD-because: "Jono Hooper personally permitted Bigfish69 published of this image, and crop". Jono Hooper must confirm this by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 08:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely own works, considering derived from artworks by unknown artist. Uploaded on 08.03.2016. File:大康先生書『鳥獸篆』“作用戈”、“自作用戈”、“越王勾踐，自作用劍”銘文.jpg is — per exif — a copyrighted work by "Krause, Johansen". File:鳥獸篆作品：“子從文武自易，用之以昭王璋”。.jpg appears tobe grabbed from the Internet via http://photo.blog.sina.com.cn/showpic.html#blogid=5f7678990102v4u5&url=http://s4.sinaimg.cn/orignal/4c926ec0td399f500ec13 (slow loading)
Gunnex (talk) 08:10, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photographer must confirm copyright status or license via COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 08:11, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
"All rights reserved" at source. Photographer must confirm license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 08:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Wrong author and/or licence; copyrighted by Troma I guess. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted trophy. COM:FOP in USA only applies to buildings. Stifle (talk) 08:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Template on ja:File:Hermann_Rumschottel_relief.jpg says:: "Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons" (FoP). --тнояsтеn ⇔ 08:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Ареал расселении не верная. 80.253.26.138 12:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)\
Oppose It's protest nomination. In file description shows the data sources. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 18:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Карта не соответсвует действительности, особенно на территории Азербайджана. Хачмазский, Огузский, Исмаиллинский, Кубинский, Кабалинский районы указаны какие-то пятна, хотя там по неофициальным данным от 30 % до 60% составляют лезгины. Прошу удалить или исправить ареал лезгин в Азербайджане. Также на территории Дагестана (Дербентском районе), лезгины расселены до самого г. Дагестанские Огни. Ordinem (talk) 08:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bkuehllong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work considering — per exif — copyrighted works by "nd Company" and (uploaded on 08.03.2016) previously published (for File:150409 35750-HDR.jpg) via (example) http://www.csm.edu/ or http://www.csm.edu/campus-life (Copyright © 2016 College of Saint Mary. All rights reserved. ) = http://www.csm.edu/sites/default/files/gallery-images/gallery_23.jpg (last modified: 2015)
Gunnex (talk) 08:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nkpoganovci (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status considering — per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook, like (uploaded in a row on 08.03.2016):
- File:522216 10150951832818120 1896176639n.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/242378683119/photos/a.10150951831068120.445440.242378683119/10150951832818120/?type=1&theater (2012)
- File:196179 10150951833088120 1088880279 n.jpg.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/242378683119/photos/a.10150951831068120.445440.242378683119/10150951833088120/?type=1&theater (2012)
- File:223207 10150177924663120 2559545 n.jpg.jpg --> https://www.facebook.com/242378683119/photos/a.10150177924418120.320608.242378683119/10150177924663120/?type=1&theater (2011, taken in 1990)
- etc. = FB https://www.facebook.com/NK-Poganovci-242378683119
Most likely several photographers involved. Permission(s) needed.
- File:522216 10150951832818120 1896176639n.jpg.jpg
- File:196179 10150951833088120 1088880279 n.jpg.jpg
- File:223207 10150177924663120 2559545 n.jpg.jpg
- File:222177 10150177924768120 7405621 n.jpg.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
The permission of the artist, Wally Reinhardt, is necessary.
- File:DIANA & ACTAEON, 1844", 2005..jpg
- File:Bacchusatopsilenus.jpg
- File:Dianaandacteon.jpg
- File:Ovid, Crowned with Immortality.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 14:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:47, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
The permission of the artist, Wally Reinhardt, is necessary.
BrightRaven (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. На фото-знак театра Вампшоу, нет разрешения театра на публикацию под свободной лицензией Dogad75 (talk) 21:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: previously pubished, watermarked, would need email verification of copyright holder's permission (OTRS). czar 23:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
EXIF data lists "© Augusto Da Silva/Graphix-images" as the copyright holder. The hotel is unable to CC licence this photo. B50006 (talk) 22:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: would need email verification of copyright holder's permission (OTRS), image can be undeleted if provided. czar 23:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. I'm aware this image is available on Bollywood Hungama, and that Bollywood Hungama has released some images under a free license. This particular image, however, is cropped from a higher-quality version hosted on Karan Singh Grover's Instagram account [4], and I see no indication that Bollywood Hungama owned the copyright to this image in the first place, or that the original is released under a free license. Huon (talk) 22:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC) This is not a copyright violation, bollywood hungama owns the right, that is why it is on their website under their nameBipsKaranfan21 (talk) 03:20, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- I explained why I doubt that Bollywood Hungama owns the copyright. It's easy to add a watermark to an image and upload it somewhere; that's not particularly convincing when someone else hosts a higher-quality copy of the same image. Huon (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: not attributed to BH at source]—see terms of license; precautionary principle. czar 00:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: "small resolution, missing EXIF" is no deletion reason, image not found elsewhere on the internet. Maybe it can be deleted as "out of scope" if person is not notable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Scene is good enough for various purposes, like musician with two instruments or log home interior. Ikar.us (talk) 10:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per User:Ikar.us. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wentworth Washington (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://drakequotes.com/pictures/drake-84.png.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_Arab_Emirates, No FoP in UAE. JWNoctis (talk) 09:18, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the photo is also likely a copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jytdog as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Stefan2 (talk) 10:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- This is a simple textlogo, but Jytdog keeps removing the copyright tag and adding {{Copyvio}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- delete. This was uploaded with a claim that an employee of a PR company owned it, which he doesn't and he granted a license, that he didn't have a right to grant. I had intitally done this to get it speedy deleted, but Stefan saw fit to do... something else. With regard to Stefan's claim, I don't know on what planet this logo is plain text. It is highly stylized. Jytdog (talk) 10:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- {{Logo}} can only be used for deleting files which are above the threshold of originality. It can't be used for deleting simple text logos. File:Nikken Logo.jpg, which is more complex than this logo, is a simple text logo according to COM:TOO#United States, and according to w:Draft:Tonix Pharmaceuticals, this is a logo from the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- The logo is highly stylized in form and color, especially the "o". Jytdog (talk) 10:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- {{Logo}} can only be used for deleting files which are above the threshold of originality. It can't be used for deleting simple text logos. File:Nikken Logo.jpg, which is more complex than this logo, is a simple text logo according to COM:TOO#United States, and according to w:Draft:Tonix Pharmaceuticals, this is a logo from the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Still bellow the Threshold of originality according to the US Copyright Law, even more complex logos like File:Best_Western_logo.svg and File:MSNBC_logo.png are still considerted bellow the TOO and DRs resolved as kept. Also, the reasoning external source, no license, no permission. is usually used only by bots like Krdbot, no reason to be used by a human, specially less experienced than Stefan2. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Also, the reasoning no license looks incorrect as there was a copyright tag (although no licence) which the user tactically decided to remove before adding the {{Copyvio}} template.
- In my opinion, the only potential reason for deletion would be COM:SCOPE. The image is currently in use in w:Draft:Tonix Pharmaceuticals (and thus automatically in scope per COM:INUSE), but that page is listed as a declined Articles for Creation draft, meaning that the page will probably be deleted half a year after the latest edit if the page is not improved. Therefore, it might be a good idea to revisit the scope issue in half a year or so, but the logo shouldn't be deleted before then and it shouldn't be deleted on copyright grounds. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- What you are writing is here is ignorant. The uploader uploaded this saying that he, as an individual person, owned the copyright. He doesn't; it is obviously owned by the company. The claim that he owned it was fraud, Not intentional, but that is what it was. There was no valid license granted as the uploader didn't own it. I can't believe how ignorant you are of intellectual property law to be so pushy on these issues. I had uploaded the logo separately with an appropriate explanation of ownership and an appropriate fair use justification and you for some reason objected to that. What you are doing here makes no sense and I am concerned that someone as active on the commons acts as erratically as you do. Jytdog (talk) 11:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's irrelevant if the uploader provides incorrect source and copyright information if the correct information can be provided by someone else. If he makes fraudulent statements, then that's an issue between him and the trademark owner, but as long as the information can be corrected, there's no reason to delete the file on legal grounds. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- What you are writing is here is ignorant. The uploader uploaded this saying that he, as an individual person, owned the copyright. He doesn't; it is obviously owned by the company. The claim that he owned it was fraud, Not intentional, but that is what it was. There was no valid license granted as the uploader didn't own it. I can't believe how ignorant you are of intellectual property law to be so pushy on these issues. I had uploaded the logo separately with an appropriate explanation of ownership and an appropriate fair use justification and you for some reason objected to that. What you are doing here makes no sense and I am concerned that someone as active on the commons acts as erratically as you do. Jytdog (talk) 11:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- In my opinion, the only potential reason for deletion would be COM:SCOPE. The image is currently in use in w:Draft:Tonix Pharmaceuticals (and thus automatically in scope per COM:INUSE), but that page is listed as a declined Articles for Creation draft, meaning that the page will probably be deleted half a year after the latest edit if the page is not improved. Therefore, it might be a good idea to revisit the scope issue in half a year or so, but the logo shouldn't be deleted before then and it shouldn't be deleted on copyright grounds. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Falls under COM:TOO. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - there is no copyright violation, but the draft is a paid contribution about an out of scope (28 employees) company - Jcb (talk) 16:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Jcb, doesn't the page on English Wikipedia need to be deleted first, per COM:INUSE? Declined drafts are usually deleted about six months after the latest edit, meaning that the page will be deleted in mid-November or so if not improved (see w:WP:G13). I'm not sure if we should keep this open for half a year, but we should definitely consider the scope issue if the Wikipedia page is deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- I tend to see a declined draft from a single purpose account with an obvious COI (user admits that Tonix is his client) as a 'user page'. Jcb (talk) 20:39, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- User:Jcb, doesn't the page on English Wikipedia need to be deleted first, per COM:INUSE? Declined drafts are usually deleted about six months after the latest edit, meaning that the page will be deleted in mid-November or so if not improved (see w:WP:G13). I'm not sure if we should keep this open for half a year, but we should definitely consider the scope issue if the Wikipedia page is deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:59, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Modern architecture in Kazakhstan, which has no freedom of panorama. Storkk (talk) 11:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, 2008 Mosque. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Depicted person died in 1953, so own work is in doubt. Correct photographer and his death year should be given to determine copyright status of the file. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unclear copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Way too professional, no exif and the only contribution of this user Gbawden (talk) 11:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:48, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted statue. No freedom of panorama in France 77.153.207.22 13:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, artist Pascal Coupot is alive. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status because these uploads may be affected by COM:PACKAGING (toy package distributed by Kuwait Airways),
- File:Airplane Brick Toys.jpg
- File:Brick Toys Airplane.jpg
- File:Kuwait Airways Brick Toys Airplane.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
See COM:DW. Stefan2 (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ich habe das Foto selbst gemacht und die Datei erstellt. Das Urheberrecht liegt ausschließlich bei mir! Bitte erstelle zukünftig keine wahllosen Löschanträge. --Wissenschaftler-Uni (talk) 13:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- You have not created the medal. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ich habe die vollen Rechte and dem Foto/Bild, da ich es geschaffen habe. Zudem auch die Genehmigung und Erlaubnis des Royal House. --Wissenschaftler-Uni (talk) 13:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- You need permission from the person who created the medal. See Special:MyLanguage/COM:OTRS. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have the permission! --Wissenschaftler-Uni (talk) 02:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- You need permission from the person who created the medal. See Special:MyLanguage/COM:OTRS. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ich habe die vollen Rechte and dem Foto/Bild, da ich es geschaffen habe. Zudem auch die Genehmigung und Erlaubnis des Royal House. --Wissenschaftler-Uni (talk) 13:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- You have not created the medal. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Two problems:
- This is a derivative work.
- This was uploaded by another uploader to w:File:Royal Order of The Engabu, Sash & Breast star.jpg about two years before the file was uploaded to Commons. The authorship claim on Commons does not match the authorship claim on Wikipedia, and the licence is different. Stefan2 (talk) 18:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Alle Rechte leigen beim Royal House und Peter Gummersbach, welcher mir diese vollumfänglich zur Verfügung gestellt hat. --Wissenschaftler-Uni (talk) 11:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- See Special:MyLanguage/COM:OTRS. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have the full permission. Peter Gummersbach send me a full document with all permissions. --Wissenschaftler-Uni (talk) 13:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- See Special:MyLanguage/COM:OTRS. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, other versions on the web too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Two problems:
- This is a derivative work.
- This appears to be a photoshopped copy of the copy here. See COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. Stefan2 (talk) 18:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Alle Rechte leigen beim Royal House und Peter Gummersbach, welcher mir diese vollumfänglich zur Verfügung gestellt hat.--Wissenschaftler-Uni (talk) 11:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- See Special:MyLanguage/COM:OTRS. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have the full permission. Peter Gummersbach send me a full document with all permissions. --Wissenschaftler-Uni (talk) 13:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- See Special:MyLanguage/COM:OTRS. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Surcouf~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Lucien Le Guern is dead in1981. Copyright violation.
- File:LExode.png
- File:LesTrompettesDuJugementDernier.png
- File:LaLiberationDeParis.png
- File:LeGuern2.png
86.217.0.110 20:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
[Transferred from enwiki] Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD01000aa8030000921f0000a7450000e34900000b4e0000c17400004fb700007bbf00005ac8000077d100005e6e0100 grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 20:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Gunnex, do you know what that Facebook EXIF means? Is it possible to somehow identify the file information page on Facebook from that information? If the EXIF means that the file comes from Facebook, then it looks strange. Maybe the rest of the uploader's files also should be checked. For example, File:FNB Field 1.jpg has similar data in the EXIF. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep Not seeing good enough reasons to not AGF.--Elvey (talk) 20:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Elvey, are you talking about the file being discussed on this page (File:First National Bank Field 2.jpg), or, considering that your comment was placed above the header line, about whatever file happens to be listed above this one on the daily log page? In the latter case, consider moving your comment to that discussion page as your comment otherwise might be overlooked if this discussion page is archived before the other discussion page. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stefan2, I am (talking about the file being discussed on this page, File:First National Bank Field 2.jpg). Moved our comments. Don't know why the weird placement occurred. --Elvey (talk) 02:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please see COM:VPC#Facebook images (exif/metadata) for more details about "FBMD" (which is probadly the abbreviation "Facebook Metadata"). Some quick examples which are (alone per title) easier to identifiable at Facebook (but only if published as "public"):
- File:10606015 194747287580126 270373760931974512 n.jpg11.jpg (30.04.2016, uploaded by Rania emad,
FBMD01000ac003000014110000bc2c0000e42d0000c32e0000425f00004e8b0000618f0000629200008b95000029db0000--> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=194747287580126&set=a.172208909833964.1073741828.100011345693860&type=1&theater (03.2016, © by "Mady Omda", identical FBMD) Gunnex (talk) 07:33, 10 May 2016 (UTC) - File:13048021 10209606632031195 9038312898398394163 o copia.jpg (03.05.2016, uploaded by Ravenousfeastband, per exif photoshopped,
FBMD01000a9c0d000083350000a87900003c810000898b0000fdc80000af250100d22d0100773a0100204901001ae20100--> grabbed & cropped & derived from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10209606632031195&set=a.1046026439478.2008995.1490165477&type=1&theater (04.2016, © by "Nikanor Vzla", identical FBMD) - File:1bew0003155 764495616894695 11937681 n.jpg (03.05.2016, uploaded by Bewran.fayaq,
FBMD01000aaa030000dc090000511500006d17000090190000c82300009a360000f2370000953a00002a3d0000f65c0000) --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=764495616894695&set=a.332225020121759.88218.100000027925284&type=1&theater (2014, © by "Bewran Fayaq", identical FBMD) - File:11024602 1610313162546151 7261185595852898662n.jpg (25.06.2015, uploaded by Hhccan2,
FBMD01000a9c0d00006928000036520000f1540000a85900000280000079c60000aacc0000f3d10000f8d80000674c0100--> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1610313162546151&set=a.1377041512539985.1073741825.100007024474030&type=1&theater (05.2015, © by "Tuğba Çeşmeci", identical FBMD) - File:11209593 910462045676865 249325157893398724 n 1.jpg (31.10.2015, uploaded by EricLewan,
FBMD01000a9a0d00007b3c00007d9200003b980000cf9e000022e50000417c01000c87010015910100fb9b0100399e0200}) --> (1st version) grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/kyiv.city.council/photos/a.790425637680507.1073741829.790418077681263/910462045676865/?type=1&theater (05.2015, © by "Київська міська рада", identical FBMD) - File:12141499 182464228756261 6427713836398273290 n-2.jpg (30.10.2015, uploaded by Mariuszeq,
FBMD01000a9c0d000006290000654f0000175400007a5c00003f7b000061b700009abd000059c60000abd1000097390100) --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/173625739640110/photos/a.177533895915961.1073741828.173625739640110/182464228756261/?type=1&theater (07.10.2015, © by "DJI Phantom 3 professional Polska", credit: "by Ka Lw", identical FBMD) - File:12122503 10206837306304317 2476880997612736877 n - Copy.jpg (15.11.2015, uploaded by Stefana Petrovic,
FBMD01000a920d0000f22a0000e1570000035800004d580000b36d0000e0a300000cab00002eab000065ab00007a0b0100) --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10206837306304317&set=a.3966052342835.2153265.1026203284&type=1&theater (10.2015, © by "Немања Драгаш", identical FBMD) - File:12096619 10204909819240494 2845975455588709019 n.jpg12096619 10204909819240494 2845975455588709019 n.jpg (17.11.2015, uploaded by Bstaab22,
FBMD01000ac203000012170000b63200006135000036380000b44900003c770000727b0000f87f00005685000088d50000) --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10204909819240494&set=a.1406632521088.2058995.1090669703&type=1&theater (11.10.2015, © by "Brittany Staab", identical FBMD) - File:12080222 10153706682042244 7616391204505669336 o-2.jpg (24.10.2015, uploaded by Stasiuk1,
FBMD01000a9c0d00008fad00006a710100e9840100ff9c01003963020085ab030000d003002cef0300b31004003f7d0600) --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153706682042244&set=a.10152683658472244.1073741834.590012243&type=1&theater (06.10.2015, © by "Hanna Hopko", identical FBMD) - File:12063292 888422277906138 5542671398119929746 n(1).jpg (24.10.2015, by Zmatený,
FBMD01000a990d000076320000178200002b860000818f0000cfe000003c7801005a800100028e0100e69f01002a920200) --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/871697796245253/photos/a.888422981239401.1073741829.871697796245253/888422277906138/?type=1&theater (04.10.2015, © by "Koupaliště Žos", identical FBMD) - File:12031626 10154328076874041 7458497127809090101 o CHINA MITOS Y LEYENDAS.jpg (27.10.2015, uploaded by JuanCarlosram,
FBMD01000a9f0d00004e220000b7330000703a00001b44000045560000846f0000e67700006c800000ab8a0000acde0000) --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/InstitutoConfucioPUCP/photos/a.10154328075994041.1073741889.170520394040/10154328076874041/?type=1&theater (06.10.2015, © by "Instituto Confucio PUCP", identical FBMD) - etc.
- File:10606015 194747287580126 270373760931974512 n.jpg11.jpg (30.04.2016, uploaded by Rania emad,
- From the above 11 examples, we have 9x obvious copyvios and 2x files, which only per interpretation of the similar used user names on Commons and Facebook may be "own works" but which would need (considering previously published on Facebook) a COM:OTRS-confirmation.
- Counting all done queries on VP, we are talking about 33.348 living files configured with "FBMD", which appears to be introduced by Facebook in 11.2014.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Huh? What makes which 9 "obvious copyvios"? You say 11 are marked ©. I looked at 1 and I see no reason to see it as a copyvio. --Elvey (talk) 00:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, Gunnex?--Elvey (talk) 22:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, Gunnex, OP? Have the uploaders all been notified? I guess you mean all but the Staab and Fayaq uploads are "obvious copyvios"? What makes them "obvious copyvios"? Hello??? --Elvey (talk) 18:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Likely comes from Facebook. This was already discussed at COM:VPC. --★ Poké95 00:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Are you claiming that everything that comes from facebook needs to be deleted? I see no argument for that. --Elvey (talk) 00:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, because Facebook's license is incompatible with our licensing policy. OTRS permission is needed. ★ Poké95 01:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- If a picture has been used outside Commons before it was used on Commons, then the uploader needs to prove that he is the copyright holder. The EXIF proves that the image previously has been used on Facebook, although the exact Facebook page is unknown. If the uploader truly is the copyright holder, then he should be able to contact OTRS and show which Facebook page it comes from and that the Facebook account belongs to him. If he is not able to prove that the Facebook account belongs to him, then it's a standard no permission case. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- No. The uploader doesn't need to prove that 'he' <sic> is the copyright holder. That's a gross oversimplification/misrepresentation of OTRS.--Elvey (talk) 22:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- If a file was used outside Commons before it was uploaded to Commons, then the uploader needs to show that he is the copyright holder or that he has permission from the copyright holder. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- No. The uploader doesn't need to prove that 'he' <sic> is the copyright holder. That's a gross oversimplification/misrepresentation of OTRS.--Elvey (talk) 22:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- What you're saying isn't true, Poke! Facebook terms say: "When you publish content or information using the Public setting, it means that you are allowing everyone, including people off of Facebook, to access and use that information, and to associate it with you (i.e., your name and profile picture)." and "By "use" we mean use, run, copy, publicly perform or display, distribute, modify, translate, and create derivative works of." (https://www.facebook.com/terms.php) I understand that this does not limit use to noncommercial use or require attribution." That's a free license.--Elvey (talk) 22:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Invalid. See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Free--PublicOnFacebook. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Elvey: Facebook's license is also revocable, see this: This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it. Commons don't accept revocable licenses. ★ Poké95 23:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- share | SHe(ə)r | verb [ with obj. ] Definition 2 in Wiktionary: To have or use in common.
- All the files in question have been shared. Here. We have not deleted them (yet). The license only ends if the content is deleted or the account closed before the content is shared, at which point it's already been sub-licensed. According to an attorney who specializes in Media/IP law, "although you may be able to withdraw your consent to the use of photos on Facebook, you should also keep in mind that if you share your photos and videos with Facebook applications, those applications may have their own terms and conditions of how they use your creation!" And that's my last comment in this thread. Since you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make one drink. I hope Poke, Stefan and Gunnex actually reply regarding facts and evidence, but I'm done holding my breath. --Elvey (talk) 18:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- But does it say anything about commercial use? Derivative works? None right? And just because there is "use" there, it means commercial use and derivative works are allowed. No. It is unclear. What "use"? So this file should be deleted under COM:PRP. ★ Poké95 00:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well, at least you aren't arguing re. revocability. Since you ask new questions, I reply:Actually, yes it does. Wrong, again. Look at the bolding above performed with this edit. What part of : "By "use" we mean use, run, copy, publicly perform or display, distribute, modify, translate, and create derivative works of." do you not understand? --Elvey (talk) 03:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, so derivative works are there, but where is commercial use? ★ Poké95 03:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Read more carefully. It says that you may create derivative works, but you may not do anything with the derivative works apart from creating them. For example, you may not distribute the derivative works. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Are you looking at the same page I'm looking at? It has the
word 'distribute' on it 4 times...quote, 'I understand that this does not limit use to noncommercial use or require attribution.' in it ... do you see that?--Elvey (talk) 03:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)- Distribute, distribute, distribute, distribute... Where the hell is the commercial use there? How can distribute=commercial use? Come on, just accept that these files cannot be kept without a free license from the copyright holder. ★ Poké95 10:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Correction, above.
- What the heck are you talking about? -- Where have I disputed that these files cannot be kept without a free license from the copyright holder? What's in dispute is whether such a license has been granted.--Elvey (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- I understand that this does not limit use to noncommercial use or require attribution. Yes, I saw that, but it is just your understanding, not a fact. How did you know that it doesn't limit use to noncommercial uses? Their use of "use" is unclear. Maybe the "use" they are saying is political use. But that's just an assumption, not a fact. We need to ask Facebook if their license allows commercial use. Another question for you: Did you read already the DR Stefan2 linked (the deletion request for the Facebook license template)? Do you understand why the template was deleted? ★ Poké95 05:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, and I see that you participated in a template for discussion at enwiki regarding the Free-OnPublicFacebook template on 2014. You're the only one that strong opposed it. Why are you still saying that Facebook's license is free despite consensus from Commons and English Wikipedia? If you want to override that consensus, do it at COM:VP, not here. We just don't like a RFC inside a deletion discussion (and that's what you did at that enwiki template for discussion, which was hillarious). Just drop the stick please. Thanks, ★ Poké95 11:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- I understand that this does not limit use to noncommercial use or require attribution. Yes, I saw that, but it is just your understanding, not a fact. How did you know that it doesn't limit use to noncommercial uses? Their use of "use" is unclear. Maybe the "use" they are saying is political use. But that's just an assumption, not a fact. We need to ask Facebook if their license allows commercial use. Another question for you: Did you read already the DR Stefan2 linked (the deletion request for the Facebook license template)? Do you understand why the template was deleted? ★ Poké95 05:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Distribute, distribute, distribute, distribute... Where the hell is the commercial use there? How can distribute=commercial use? Come on, just accept that these files cannot be kept without a free license from the copyright holder. ★ Poké95 10:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Are you looking at the same page I'm looking at? It has the
- Read more carefully. It says that you may create derivative works, but you may not do anything with the derivative works apart from creating them. For example, you may not distribute the derivative works. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, so derivative works are there, but where is commercial use? ★ Poké95 03:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well, at least you aren't arguing re. revocability. Since you ask new questions, I reply:Actually, yes it does. Wrong, again. Look at the bolding above performed with this edit. What part of : "By "use" we mean use, run, copy, publicly perform or display, distribute, modify, translate, and create derivative works of." do you not understand? --Elvey (talk) 03:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- But does it say anything about commercial use? Derivative works? None right? And just because there is "use" there, it means commercial use and derivative works are allowed. No. It is unclear. What "use"? So this file should be deleted under COM:PRP. ★ Poké95 00:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Elvey: Facebook's license is also revocable, see this: This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it. Commons don't accept revocable licenses. ★ Poké95 23:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- Invalid. See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Free--PublicOnFacebook. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- If a picture has been used outside Commons before it was used on Commons, then the uploader needs to prove that he is the copyright holder. The EXIF proves that the image previously has been used on Facebook, although the exact Facebook page is unknown. If the uploader truly is the copyright holder, then he should be able to contact OTRS and show which Facebook page it comes from and that the Facebook account belongs to him. If he is not able to prove that the Facebook account belongs to him, then it's a standard no permission case. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, because Facebook's license is incompatible with our licensing policy. OTRS permission is needed. ★ Poké95 01:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Are you claiming that everything that comes from facebook needs to be deleted? I see no argument for that. --Elvey (talk) 00:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
This should be closed keep; the uploaders haven't even been notified, as is required by COM:D policy for all but obvious violations. I'm curious to see if that policy will be ignored. I just noticed the intentional use of {{Noping}} by Gunnex in order to avoid alerting the uploaders. What the frack? --Elvey (talk) 03:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Notifying uploaders is not mandatory. At the section "Regular deletion": the uploader should be informed of the impending deletion. Should is different to must. But you can request a change at the policy's talk page if you want. ★ Poké95 03:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- The Commons uploader (FastilyClone) was notified in Special:Diff/195792231. Note that the uploader has redirected his talk page, thereby asking users to send notifications to another talk page. If a user follows that redirect when sending a notification, it should be assumed that the uploader has been notified. Also, the Wikipedia uploader was notified in w:Special:Diff/719460383, so both uploaders have been notified. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Eight of the above files have already been deleted while this DR is open. The uploaders haven't even been notified, as is required by COM:D policy for all but obvious violations - which Poke isn't quoting and is misrepresenting. Way to breed contempt for policy! Go Team! </sarcasm>--Elvey (talk) 02:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Elvey, you misunderstood what is the meaning of "should". "Should" doesn't mean mandatory. It is "must", not "should". "Should" means suggestion, so you can choose whether to follow it or not. "Must" means command, where you have no choice but to follow it. As I said, you may ask for a change at the policy's talk page. Why are you so desperate in keeping this file? ★ Poké95 02:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Eight of the above files have already been deleted while this DR is open. The uploaders haven't even been notified, as is required by COM:D policy for all but obvious violations - which Poke isn't quoting and is misrepresenting. Way to breed contempt for policy! Go Team! </sarcasm>--Elvey (talk) 02:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- The Commons uploader (FastilyClone) was notified in Special:Diff/195792231. Note that the uploader has redirected his talk page, thereby asking users to send notifications to another talk page. If a user follows that redirect when sending a notification, it should be assumed that the uploader has been notified. Also, the Wikipedia uploader was notified in w:Special:Diff/719460383, so both uploaders have been notified. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- No, I didn't. I'm quite familiar with RFC 2119. I'm not; a whole bunch of files are being deleted, or are you too ... blinkered to have noticed? Why are you commenting without hearing what I'm saying? In other words: There's no 'should' in the policy I'm looking at and referring you to. In other words, you are not quoting and are misrepresenting policy. Why do you persist in doing that? For crying out loud! What part of there's no SHOULD where the COM:D policy says "notify the uploaders that you have tagged the file as well" do you not comprehend?--Elvey (talk) 03:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Elvey: The part "notify the uploaders that you have tagged the file as well" is only for tagging files as "no permission", "no source", "no license", and "derivative work, missing original source", not regular deletion/deletion request, which is this one. At the section Regular deletion, it says the uploader should be informed of the impending deletion. "Should" is only a recommendation, not a requirement. And marking your whole paragraph/reply with bold means you're shouting that no one wants to hear you. We hear you. ★ Poké95 09:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- The uploaders (both of them) were notified by the nominator, so I'm not sure what you are talking about. Also, the file hasn't been deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- OMG. I said files, not file. Come on. You honestly can't see that ~12 files are listed on this page? What part of "Eight of the above files have already been deleted while this DR is open." is beyond your comprehension? What part of I just noticed the intentional use of {{noping}} by Gunnex in order to avoid alerting the uploaders. What the frack? is beyond your comprehension? Clearly you don't hear me. (I don't recall bolding that paragraph, but it's amazing how resistant you are to understanding what I say. What is wrong chez vous, I wonder. It's not like I didn't say I just noticed the intentional use of {{Noping}} by Gunnex in order to avoid alerting the uploaders. What the frack?. It's not like the the ~20 uses of {{Noping}} in the source of this page are hard to find. )--Elvey (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Only one file has been nominated for deletion on this page, and the uploaders of that file have been notified. Additionally, a user linked to some other files which have not been nominated for deletion on this page. Some of them have been nominated for deletion elsewhere, though. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- OMG. I said files, not file. Come on. You honestly can't see that ~12 files are listed on this page? What part of "Eight of the above files have already been deleted while this DR is open." is beyond your comprehension? What part of I just noticed the intentional use of {{noping}} by Gunnex in order to avoid alerting the uploaders. What the frack? is beyond your comprehension? Clearly you don't hear me. (I don't recall bolding that paragraph, but it's amazing how resistant you are to understanding what I say. What is wrong chez vous, I wonder. It's not like I didn't say I just noticed the intentional use of {{Noping}} by Gunnex in order to avoid alerting the uploaders. What the frack?. It's not like the the ~20 uses of {{Noping}} in the source of this page are hard to find. )--Elvey (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- The uploaders (both of them) were notified by the nominator, so I'm not sure what you are talking about. Also, the file hasn't been deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Elvey: The part "notify the uploaders that you have tagged the file as well" is only for tagging files as "no permission", "no source", "no license", and "derivative work, missing original source", not regular deletion/deletion request, which is this one. At the section Regular deletion, it says the uploader should be informed of the impending deletion. "Should" is only a recommendation, not a requirement. And marking your whole paragraph/reply with bold means you're shouting that no one wants to hear you. We hear you. ★ Poké95 09:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- No, I didn't. I'm quite familiar with RFC 2119. I'm not; a whole bunch of files are being deleted, or are you too ... blinkered to have noticed? Why are you commenting without hearing what I'm saying? In other words: There's no 'should' in the policy I'm looking at and referring you to. In other words, you are not quoting and are misrepresenting policy. Why do you persist in doing that? For crying out loud! What part of there's no SHOULD where the COM:D policy says "notify the uploaders that you have tagged the file as well" do you not comprehend?--Elvey (talk) 03:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
BTW, Poke, I had a good laugh when I noticed, after reading your uttering each of these things:
- Should is different to must.
- "Should" is only a recommendation, not a requirement.
- "Should" doesn't mean mandatory.
- "Should" means suggestion, so you can choose whether to follow it or not.
I found the following at the top of COM:D:
It has wide acceptance among editors and is considered a standard that everyone should follow. (Because it includes {{Policy}}).
It's particularly amusing given the incredible inconsistency with which editors are held to COM:D. It's also amusing and sad that, after having said OTRS permission is needed. you act as if you fail to grok that for these files, the section of policy is not being followed that states:
- If there is some licensing information missing, then the file gets tagged as missing information and the uploader is informed and given 7 days time to correct the problem.
To claim that these files have been deleted in accord with the the regular DR (deletion request) process is farcical. --Elvey (talk) 06:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment First the DR seems correct, and the uploader to Commons has been notified. Second there is no doubt the image passed via Facebook, "FBMD" in the metadata. Third, the content of facebook is copyrighted, the "term of use" talk about the license the facebook user give to Facebook when uploading content but not about the license given by Facebook when the image is on their website. When you upload an image on facebook, you give them " a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license ...", but never facebook nor the uploader have not currently given any rights to us. The terms of use is a contract between the user and facebook, in no way it's written we can freely use the content. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per my comment above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Wrong author and/or licence; can be found on many sites, this one have it with the exact same dimensions: http://www.moron.com/man-gives-wet-willy-to-a-4-year-old-boy/ Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. —howcheng {chat} 16:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.metalpower.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/HD-factory-wallpaper-1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. —howcheng {chat} 16:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
_Creek_BC.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Creek_BC.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not an FWS image: taken by NatGeo photographer Joel Sartore and licensed to FWS under the following terms: "Non-US Fish and Wildlife Service individuals may download these images only for personal, private use." See http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/cdm/singleitem/collection/natdiglib/id/10879/rec/187 , under "Rights". Also available as a stock image at http://www.joelsartore.com/stock/ANI082-00093/ Rrburke (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
_Creek_BC.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 16:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
_Creek_BC.jpg){kind=link}
Small photo without metadata, found at http://yemen-press.com/news6612.html from January 2012. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. —howcheng {chat} 16:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster with watermarked website: wrong licence and wrong author. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 19:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. —howcheng {chat} 16:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING Krd 12:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
es gibt keinen Grund, diese Bild zu löschen. Es hat dieselbe Existenzberechtigung wie viele anderer solcher Bilder (Coca Cola, unzählige Biersorten, und und und......).
Was genau ist das Problem? Der Künstler ist ausdrücklich damit einverstanden, dass es hier verbleibt. Qwertzu111111 (talk) 10:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo Qwertzu111111. Der Künstler könnte uns eine Freigabe senden, wie in COM:CONSENT beschrieben ist. Gruß… --Krd 06:36, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Krd. Danke für den Hinweis. Gibt es das Schriftstück auch in Deutsch?
- Hallo. Siehe: Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen --Krd 17:51, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, if a permission is sent the file will be undeleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
poster not permanently in public space, FOP does not apply, no permission Krd 12:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Oh doch, dieses riesige Wandbild ist für die "Ewigkeit" gedacht. Es soll (und es wird) permanent dort zu sehen sein. Den Aufwand hat man nicht für ein paar Monate betrieben. Auch wenn der September 2016 vorbei sein wird, wird dieses Bild mit den Peanuts dort verbleiben. Qwertzu111111 (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
... noch eine Bemerkung: Das Bild ist nicht von Charles M. Schulz, sondern von Vicki Scott Qwertzu111111 (talk) 20:44, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously photoshopped. Gunnex (talk) 15:09, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status, considering (also per file title) most likley affected by COM:DM/COM:DW (photo of a video presentation with an animation by nvidia). Gunnex (talk) 15:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work"/CC by Flickr user "Gamerscore Blog": small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked (most likely a web screenshot). Per Flickr description: fan upload.
Flickr user related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Age of Empires - Port Village.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 15:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Wrong licence: http://www.bootcampaign.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/DOLLY_PARTON-2-BC-964x642.jpg http://www.bootcampaign.org/terms-of-use/ § COPYRIGHT "All content included on the Site (text, graphics, logos, button icons, images, software, etc.) is the property of Boot Campaign and Social Butler or its content suppliers and is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws." Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
I work for this company and have permission to use copyrighted images for this purpose. Md7799 (talk) 15:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)user:Md7799
- @Md7799: Still, you can't place them at the same time under 2 incompatible licences: copyright and CC BY-SA 4.0. Having permission is not enough, you must give permission and change term of use. Copyrighted images are not allowed on Commons. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Jcb. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright infringement: http://www.bootcampaign.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/FGL-branded-964x642.jpg http://www.bootcampaign.org/terms-of-use/ § Copyright "All content included on the Site (text, graphics, logos, button icons, images, software, etc.) is the property of Boot Campaign and Social Butler or its content suppliers and is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws." Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- I work for this organization and have permission to use images for this purpose. Md7799 (talk) 15:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Md7799
- Same answer as for Commons:Deletion requests/File:DollyParton Boots small.jpg, you personally have permission but you don't give it to every one. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:22, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Jcb. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
File:Меморіальний комплекс «Український державний музей історії Великої Вітчизняної війни 1941-45 років» у Києві.JPG
[edit]
No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alonso de Mendoza (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looking at the flickrstream, I see suspicious things, for example a newspaper scan. Also, the Flickr account holder seems to appear on many/most of the pictures, but the pictures do not seem to be selfies, so the Flickr account holder is unlikely to be the copyright holder. Presumed Flickrwashing. I would also recommend adding the Flickr account holder to User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors.
Stefan2 (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:42, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alonso de Mendoza (talk · contribs)
[edit]These two files were uploaded using a rather special license tag for German works that does NOT apply to the images, because they were NOT "published by a legal entity under public law". As the images are German and from ca. 1943, there's a good chance that the authors (who are not named) lived beyond 1948, which would mean the images are still protected in Germany. Also, they are still protected in the US because of the URAA. This means the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 16:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete: Non-free images. --K.e.coffman (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Per rationale. Buidhe (talk) 22:32, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
I really do not understand how, mechanically, to respond. I hope this is the way and that you will see this.
The photo Francis Jammes en 1917.jpg was taken in 1917 in France by an unrecorded photographer. I am the President of the Association Francis Jammes, Maison Chrestia, 7 Avenue Francis Jammes, F-64300 Orthez, France, and we own the picture and its rights. It is out of copyright and we put it in the public domain as we vastly prefer it to the previous picture of Francis Jammes, unilaterally inserted apparently by Wikipedia. I have found that the English language Francis Jammes page also has another picture to which we vastly prefer ours, so I have also inserted ours there.
Nicholas Newman President Association Francis Jammes nicholas.newman<at>skynet.be ass.fjammes<at>wanadoo.fr www.francis-jammes.com
- Dear Nicholas Newman, Thank you for your reply, you reacted on the right place. Based on your remarks I have changed the license to a public domain because of anonymous (over 70 y old) work. I think the file can be kept with these changes, thank you for the clarifications. Basvb (talk) 17:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. --Nicholas Newman (talk) 07:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)--Nicholas Newman (talk) 07:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 17:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
self-created artwork Takeaway (talk) 23:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Good example of people in digital art. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 17:49, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Wrong author. Maybe wrong licence. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Doublon de l'image orininal Martin m159 (talk) 18:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Betroffenen Personen / Verletzten sind nicht verpixelt; Fremde Personen im Bild, aussenwirkund der Sitzenden Person / haben alle Personen im Bild zur Veröffnetlichung zugestimmt? Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 06:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info Recreated the image from the source. Higher overall quality, blurred persons.
- Comment About PR effect, cosplay/Trachtenverein-like appearance of some emergency forces is perceived as more embarrassing by some others.
- --Ikar.us (talk) 13:29, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Perhaps delete the superseded revisions? --Ikar.us (talk) 00:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Older revisions have been hidden from public view. Green Giant (talk) 19:44, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Betroffenen Personen / Verletzten sind nicht verpixelt; Fremde Personen im Bild, aussenwirkund der Sitzenden Person / haben alle Personen im Bild zur Veröffnetlichung zugestimmt? Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 06:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Auf diesem Bild sind Sanitäter und Patienten zu sehen, ohne dessen Erlaubnis und ohne Zensierung! 2003:C7:B3DA:2400:B0D4:8B5F:EBBC:DC36 13:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Kein Löschgrund. Öffentliche Straßenszene, einzelne Gesichter nur klein und undeutlich zu erkennen. Daher keine Einwilligung der abgebildeten Personen notwendig.
No reason to delete. Street scene at public event, individual faces only small and blurry. Therefore no permission by subjects required. --Latebird (talk) 18:47, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info Repeated nomination merged/deleted. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:20, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- And there are no patients / injured persons. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Info I recreated the file from a different source, not because of this nomination. Especially the point that the scene has a bad PR effect is not only irrelevant, but not agreed with by the service personnel. --Ikar.us (talk) 23:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Perhaps delete the superseded revisions? --Ikar.us (talk) 00:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Older revisions have been hidden from public view. Green Giant (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure that this image is really free licensed (Ibanez logotype) and own work from Desdafr (talk · contribs). I asked him on French Wikipedia. Arcyon (discuter) 13:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- OTRS pending. --Arcyon (discuter) 17:13, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS received but not confirmed. The file will be deleted if permission is not confirmed by 22 June 2016. Green Giant (talk) 20:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
I think there needs to be a discussion regarding the suitability of this image for Commons.
This is the image from which this image is derived. The master image is clearly a freedom of panorama pass, and any copyrighted work is clearly deminimis to the overall work. However, this derivative image focuses solely and entirely on work that is copyrighted to the Korean Central News Agency, being a broadcast of that organization. Does its display in a public location void all rights? I don't think so, but I'd like to hear others thoughts about this. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- As cited on Commons:FOP#Korea_.28North.29, DPRK law says "A copyrighted work may be used without the permission of the copyright owner [...] When a copyrighted work in public places is copied." This is from a giant display in a public square, similar to the portraits and statues in Category:FoP-North Korea. Jonathunder (talk) 02:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: I've argued before that since the passage quoted above is everything that the North Korean copyright law has to say on FOP, it means that the law sets no restrictions on reuse (i.e. tight crops are allowed). Please read my message here: en:Talk:Kim Jong-un#New FOP images found. Finnusertop (talk) 17:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Once you crop a FOP picture to show one particular detail then FOP no longer applies if that detail is not part of a building or a public work of art, but is a person. BabelStone (talk) 21:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note, I've nominated File:0923 - Nordkorea 2015 - Pjöngjang - Public Viewing am Bahnhofsplatz (22584887139).jpg for deletion as it's main focus is on the giant TV screen showing Kim Jong-un. BabelStone (talk) 21:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- BabelStone can you tell us what your interpretation is based on? What you describe is how it works in some jurisdictions - COM:FOP#The right to modify discusses the German law - because those restrictions are found in national laws. As I pointed out in the discussion linked above, North Korean law sets no such restrictions. North Korean law simply says that there is FOP for copyrighted works in public places and sets no restrictions whatsoever on modifications or the nature of reuse. I find no evidence of the restrictions you have described in the relevant parts of U.S. law or Commons policy either. Both say that if a work is FOP PD in the county of origin, it's PD and thus okay for Commons. (But note the rather theoretical exception: Template:Not-free-US-FOP, which however concludes: "The current policy on Commons is to accept photos of artwork and sculptures that are covered by freedom of panorama in their source country.") Finnusertop (talk) 23:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: I think the best we could do is to rely on the DPRK constitution which permits using the image. Oppashi (talk) 21:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Should be non-free. Incorrectly tagged. Cloudbound (talk) 20:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Není důvod jej mazat, jedná se o oficiální znak společnosti a tento znak je použit i na en wikipedii. Tudíž jsem přesvědčen, že je volným dílem a může být zveřejněno.--AnkaElektro (talk) 12:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Lots of things are publicly visible and logos are unavoidably so by their very nature. However, this does not make them public domain, which is a legal term meaning anyone can use it for any purpose without permission from the copyright holder. This logo could be uploaded locally to any Wikipedia that allows fair use. Green Giant (talk) 20:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
