Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 13th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If copied from CNN, I doubt it is free. Yann (talk) 11:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Credits say producted and hosted by Percy von Lipinski. --Sporti (talk) 11:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Same thing with File:Bled Castle 2012.webm. Lipinski seems to be an independent reporter and "citizen journalism" initiator whose work was published on CNN.--MZaplotnik (edits) 13:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: If you think it is OK, I withdraw this nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Isabelle Boni-Claverie.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the federal government releases its works under a public domain license, that is not necessarily true of county governments. We need evidence that this image has been released by the county and/or the fire department. C.Fred (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permission was granted to Wikimedia Commons under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International on ticket #2016021310013062 Dmorales2016 (talk) 01:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS ticket received. -- Darwin Ahoy! 08:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. A famous person's signature cannot be the uploader's "own work". Binksternet (talk) 07:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presence of a similar file (modified) Belpois30 (talk) 17:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presence of a similar file (Reece Shearsmith.jpg) Belpois30 (talk) 17:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by SarahStierch; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 09:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry problem with the license.. incompatibility Flickr License (CC BY SA NC 2.0) AND CC BY SA 2.0.. Bebone fr (talk) 23:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete. Uploader's mistake. — TintoMeches, 02:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Túrelio; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 09:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait of someone not notable (Commons is not a private web host). Sismarinho (talk) 15:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: obvious copyvio (https://filmmakers.de/misc/image?id=642867). --Wdwd (talk) 21:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, only useful for vandalism Uncle Milty (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 23:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maryland PNG shields

[edit]

Superseded by File:MD Route 100.svg series; these files use the wrong design, while the SVGs use the proper specifications (rounded corners, proper font sizing). --Rschen7754 22:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ich möchte diese Galerie nicht löschen, nur das erste Bild unter "Face of a woman" scheint eindeutlich männlich; außerdem sind dort auch noch vier US-Präsidenten zu sehen. Wenn sich keiner um diese Galerie kümmert sollte sie wohl gelöscht werden. Hystrix (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unscharf, zu dunkel und zu klein Banffy (talk) 23:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Krd 14:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim unlikely INeverCry 23:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark ARR. Yann (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request - a low-quality, hazy pic of an airplane wing and clouds - doesn't meet COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation [1] Wikifido (talk) 10:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 10:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

la photo n'a pas de source Amandinefd (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 10:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This category is obsolete and can be replaced by Category:École régionale des Beaux-Arts de Rouen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean-no (talk • contribs) 19:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: use {{Category redirect}} instead. — TintoMeches, 02:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Info: Also covered by Category:Aître Saint-Maclou. --Achim (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected to Category:École supérieure d'art et design Le Havre-Rouen. --Achim (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This category is obsolete and empty, replaced by : Category:École supérieure d'art et design Le Havre-Rouen. --Jean-no (talk) 19:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: use {{Category redirect}} instead. — TintoMeches, 02:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected to Category:École supérieure d'art et design Le Havre-Rouen. --Achim (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PokestarFan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

If these are own work, as claimed, they are personal art of a non-notable artist and therefore out of scope. If they are someone else's work, then they are copyright violations. Either way, we cannot keep them.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by PokestarFan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seven blocks of color, not categorized. No educational purpose.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty gallery 최광모 (talk) 01:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my own photo. Need to remove my personal data from search engine indexing and public access. Rafizeldi (talk) 01:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope and promotional Edslov (talk) 05:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in all cases the logo is above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope and promotional Edslov (talk) 05:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also private image. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope and promotional Edslov (talk) 05:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no quite notable sport team and logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope and promotional Edslov (talk) 05:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no quite notable sport team and logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work?? 2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 07:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, we need author and source to determine copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mmjcanchew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works

2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 07:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, one exemple http://www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/london-life/as-katie-holmes-bars-suri-from-sea-org-the-sussex-school-whose-pupils-vanish-at-16-to-join-7935866.html. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 08:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 08:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ut of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 09:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taxonomically wrong and too blurry to figure out the right genus Kopiersperre (talk) 09:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (206x206 px) resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused photo, Wikimedia Commins is not Facebook Steinsplitter (talk) 10:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mattcampyohio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. One was used in deleted joke/attack page en:Ryan Gilkerson

JohnCD (talk) 10:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FAMOUS NOTE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused private images, out of scope. Commons is no private web host.

Achim (talk) 10:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, this image has copyright million of pages 181.228.104.10 21:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Example: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/11/26/2385B88A00000578-0-image-11_1417000484506.jpg
Also not from 2016, as claimed by uploader, but already published in 2014[2]. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mein haus soll nicht im internet sein 87.181.16.84 12:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Darauf gibt es bei solchen Bildern kein Anrecht. Admin: See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Schmalkalden, Stiller Tor 11, 13-001.jpg --Magnus (talk) 12:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep 1. Panoramafreiheit. 2. Laut Amtsblatt Teil eines Denkmalbereichs und somit für Wikipedia relevant. --Tilman2007 (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a poster. It may not reach the threshold of originality. Mys_721tx (talk) 13:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also see File:照片901.jpg. -Mys_721tx (talk) 13:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Per Mys 721tx.,  Keep. --Stang 08:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep,{{FoP-China}}--Antigng (talk) 13:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment; For the benefit of non-Chinese readers, Google's auto-translation of reply above reads "This picture is of my own propaganda wall painting in the streets shooting, I do not understand why not original. - ★ Xiao Zheng" Ubcule (talk) 21:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Keep per {{Template:FoP-China}}. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently the 2D graphic work here is not for permanent or long-term display, since this is a poster in front of a construction site in 2013. Per a 1995 reply by the Supreme People's Court, works meant for planned exhibition in public in a definite period, like Lantern Festival artworks, cannot benefit from Chinese FOP clause. See [3]. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:30, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Polish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © Microsoft Amitie 10g (talk) 16:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Microsoft Windows screenshot. Delete per Commons:Licensing. --ThePolish 16:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is a Wikipedia screenshot. It could be easily corpped. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Image has been cropped. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kymodoké (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no permissions

{{PD-JORF}}.  Keep -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 13:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
{{PD-JORF}}.  Keep -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 13:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 08:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Most of the files needed the permission of their author. Concerning the 2 images of Journal officiel, they are copyright-free, but they are out of scope (history of a non notable association). --BrightRaven (talk) 15:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 08:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope (self-promotion). --BrightRaven (talk) 15:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all files about windows 10 and other devises 86.139.33.166 07:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I see no unfree elements. --Storkk (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started as per File:MYNA TV LOGO.png, Roland zh (talk) 01:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope (advertising). --BrightRaven (talk) 14:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 01:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably a copyvio. See [4]. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 01:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably a copyvio. See [5]. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 01:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://educrib.com/college/180/adi-shankara-institute-of-engineering-and-technology-kalady. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicity photo, unlikely to be own work - http://www.mtv.com/artists/numeer-nabi/photos/topspin:489086/ --ghouston (talk) 03:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work", and though it is in the public domain (taken in 1902), it's a duplicate of File:John Dewey in 1902.jpg czar 05:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be a commercial album cover Peripitus (talk) 10:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal art .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment One or two of user's other uploads hover on the margins of in-scope usefulness as well. Ubcule (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Derivative work of statue "Kaupunki kasvaa" (The city grows) by finnish sculptor Unto Hietanen (died in 2009). No freedom of panorama in Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 11:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has a (R) registered sign in the right Doblecaña (talk) 12:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Simple logo (see COM:TOO). See also COM:NCR. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:39, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source stated, PD-Canada cannot be verified. Msaynevirta (talk) 12:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:42, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wiki isn't a medium for self promotion. Out of scope! No educational purpose. ProfessorX (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC) The same is true for:[reply]

  • File:Justin 11.JPG
  • File:Justin 9.jpg
  • File:Justin 8.JPG
  • File:Justin 10.jpg
  • File:Justin 7.JPG
  • File:Justin 5.jpg
  • File:Justin 6.jpg
  • File:Justin 4.jpg
  • File:Justin 3.jpg ‎
  • File:Justin 1.jpg
    And I don't think this is en:Justin Bieber, is ist? --ProfessorX (talk) 14:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment Is the guy a Justin Bieber impersonator? File:Justin 10.jpg explicitly states "Justin Bieber". Ubcule (talk) 21:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. He seems to be a Justin Bieber impersonator (see [6]). --BrightRaven (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused personal photo, out of scope. C messier (talk) 17:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    duplicate of File:Dioecesis Orientis 400 AD.png, falsely claimed as own work Constantine 00:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: duplicate of File:Dioecesis Orientis 400 AD.png. P 1 9 9   20:12, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    duplicate of File:11 13th century Asia Minor Turkish Invasions.png; falsely claimed as own work Constantine 00:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: duplicate of File:11 13th century Asia Minor Turkish Invasions.png. P 1 9 9   20:13, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    User-requested deletion of recently uploaded file. Duplicate picture with File:San Juan de Limay Gordita2.jpg Martinogk (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Why do you want to delete it? This file is higher quality than the one you want to keep. BrightRaven (talk) 14:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    It was uploaded by mistake, without proper credit to the photographer, and I do not know how to erase a file that I myself uploaded. I am sorry about that. Martinogk (talk) 14:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: courtesy deletion of recently uploaded file. P 1 9 9   20:19, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The person credited in the image does not appear to be the same person as the person who uploaded the image. Furthermore, I find the small image size questionable, especially since this is what would be expected if one took the image right off of a web page, instead of uploading it from their computer if they actually owned the image. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 07:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:19, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by M.sohailtariq (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    useless without descriptions

    2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 08:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, poor quality as well. P 1 9 9   20:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Lorena bruschi (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 11.2015. Gunnex (talk) 09:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:23, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    it is not mein 137.248.64.25 09:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete, author's permission appears to be missing. →Nagy 13:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:24, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    매드하우스 로고를 배껴서 저작권을 침해했기 때문. Kgw5360 (talk) 11:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



    Deleted: inferior copy of File:Madhouse studio logo.svg. P 1 9 9   20:26, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused / overexposed, there are better pictures in Category:Crassostrea virginica Kopiersperre (talk) 11:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:27, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Redundant bad quality, misleading title, better quality images exist Doblecaña (talk) 11:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: superseded by many better ones at Category:Cuatro Torres Business Area, Madrid. P 1 9 9   20:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Ycarvajal (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    "Own" works

    2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 15:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: likely copyvio. P 1 9 9   20:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Commons is not a private web host. Sismarinho (talk) 15:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:32, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:32, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by TBarnes4 (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/images/ic/1200x675/p02rqpzn.jpg.

    EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:33, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal file 2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 15:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:34, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:34, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:35, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    picture of a page of a book – license definitely incorrect Albinfo (talk) 15:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:35, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://diana.dclough.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Di_new_port.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:36, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s3.amazonaws.com/storage1.magcloud.com/image/preview/bdf0c5345a24114eb02d433fb3894311.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CYzZCkPUQAAfbQW.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete As indicated per "Foto De Gabriela Spanic Subida A Su Cuenta De Twitter El Dia 16 De Enero De 2016" taken from "Gabriela Spanic"'s Twitter (published there: 16.01.2016), republished also on Facebook via https://www.facebook.com/gabrielaspanicgrecia/photos/pb.1407410546215915.-2207520000.1457692368./1558887711068197/?type=3&theater (16.01.2016). --Gunnex (talk) 10:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:38, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Meditaspoliclinicos (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    out of project scope

    Motopark (talk) 15:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:38, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    own work ? 2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 16:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Was copied from en wiki, file is unsourced at best (likely a copyvio). --Denniss (talk) 16:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
     Delete. It seems unlikely that a woman in India would be the one to take the portrait photograph of a Yale Professor used for their official obituary.
    Looking at en:Special:Log/Pavani and comparing it to other files that have not yet been transferred, it looks like the user uploaded a bunch of files with the file description "Rights with the author. / I, the copyright holder..." which suggests that they either do not understand or do not care what the words "copyright holder" actually mean. Consequently, I've started Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pavani at English Wikipedia. LX (talk, contribs) 10:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per user:LX. P 1 9 9   20:40, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:41, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Advertising, derivative work (book cover) in the upper left corner, person of questionable notability (out of scope) Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:41, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused personal photo, out of scope. And low resolution and blurry to be usefull either at the subjevt selfie or for the cell phone. C messier (talk) 16:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:42, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Bad crop (out of scope) and possible copyright violation (despite the EXIF), see the name of the photographer in the EXIF data. C messier (talk) 17:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:42, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused personal photo, out of scope. C messier (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused personal photo, out of scope. Commons isn't yours family album. C messier (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused personal photo, out of scope C messier (talk) 17:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused personal photo, out of scope. C messier (talk) 17:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Not an own work, but a shapshot from Rai1. Is Rai 1 freely licensed? C messier (talk) 17:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused personal photo, out of scope. C messier (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Just a guy in a t-shirt saying "Colorado Golf"; I can't see this having much educational use. Ubcule (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: personal photo. P 1 9 9   20:45, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Was created to show the leveling of the picture and for nothing else. Its purpose is complete. The original is up, and no need to have duplicates, specially if it is of lower quality. Caballero//Historiador 17:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:46, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    mis-Spelling of Statue makes searching difficult Akshat.saxena21 (talk) 17:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: duplicate of File:Bhojtal and Raja Bhoj Statue at sunset.jpg. P 1 9 9   20:47, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Sorry, what is this supposed to *be*? Without background or description it's meaningless and hence useless and out-of-scope. (I guess one could argue that it represents itself, i.e. an "uncopyrighted file"(!)) Ubcule (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:47, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 18:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:48, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Es personal e irrelevante MarinaFerrerm4 (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:48, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 18:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:49, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Appears to be a crop of an image found here. *That* image quite clearly belongs to a set which is found on this page, and while that doesn't definitively prove that this is a copyvio, the lack of background info and nonsense description (along with user's other uploads) make it look unlikely that they're the original photographer. Ubcule (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:49, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Image whose low resolution and isolated context *really* smack of it having come from somewhere else- and indeed, it's found here in a much more logical and plausible context. Ubcule (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Additionally derived from copyrighted content considering Google Gunnex (talk) 18:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 18:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 18:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 18:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 18:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    "Porn stars about to start a film"? Doubt it; even if they were, that doesn't show on the photo which comes across as an out-of-scope Instagrammed selfie. Ubcule (talk) 18:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: possibly slander too. P 1 9 9   20:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of scope image, not used for personal purposes. (" Imagen Fuera del alcance, no se utilizan para fines personales.") Ubcule (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused diagram: should be done as normal wiki table Kopiersperre (talk) 18:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:54, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Promoational poster, not own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:54, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Samuel.ifrs (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

    Gunnex (talk) 19:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Google Reverse Image search shows in use long before uploaded here and e.g. " Uploaded on July 28, 2010 © All Rights Reserved by Tahir_Iqbal" Ubcule (talk) 19:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:57, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Feel free to add background etc., but is "Ans Rana" a famous person, and how plausible is it that uploader has the rights to this image (if it isn't a selfie?) Ubcule (talk) 19:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unless "Ans Rana" is a notable person, I'd assume that this is an out-of-scope selfie of non-notable uploader (and unused for personal purposes). Ubcule (talk) 19:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Raghuveer singh shikh (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Commercial spam.

    Ubcule (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Files uploaded by Raghuveer singh shikh (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Insufficient background information to determine whether these uploads are useful.

    Ubcule (talk) 19:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:58, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused head shot of man, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:59, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Self-promo spam. Commons and Wikipedia are not your personal webhost.

    Images used purely for (out-of-scope) personal promotional purposes by non-contributing user at en.wikipedia (see en:Special:Contributions/Christopher_oluwaseyi_Osereme). Now no longer in use.

    Ubcule (talk) 19:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Herry Kill (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 3x speedy deleted.

    Gunnex (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Ftisland0085 (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.

    Gunnex (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    "For Wikipedia use only" ist keine in Commons zulässige Genehmigung Jbergner (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:04, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution copy of File:7704 - Piraeus Arch. Museum, Athens - Lion from the grave for Pelthinikos - Photo by Giovanni Dall'Orto,.jpg Kareyac (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:04, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution unused copy of File:AR nomos of Velia.jpg Kareyac (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:05, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Shurmanita16 (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Out of scope and probable copyvios due to being apparent derivatives of copyrighted works. (Auto translation: "Fuera de alcance y ios copia probables debido a ser aparentes derivados de obras con derechos de autor.")

    Ubcule (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Agree  Delete Palosirkka (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:06, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Poor quality image of a dog, something we're exactly not short of. (Auto translation: " imatge mala qualitat d'un gos, cosa que no estem exactament per sota de.) Ubcule (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Fair point, I should have noticed that. Notable that it was added by an anonymous editor with "joke" slogan "Big Niggah". At any rate, I replaced it with a higher quality image, so it's not in use now. (Not that *how* its used outwith Commons is technically any of our business).
    At any rate, I don't want that to come across as disingenuous sleight of hand intended put it out of use and justify my original (flawed) case, so I'll leave it up to someone else to decide whether it should be retained or not. Ubcule (talk) 14:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: no longer in use, unusable poor quality. P 1 9 9   21:07, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
    • Looks* like a low resolution image of a guinea pig, but even translating the Spanish description doesn't make this clear. (Auto translation: "Parece una imagen de baja resolución de un conejillo de indias como, pero incluso traducir la descripción española no hace esto en claro.") Ubcule (talk) 20:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: unusable poor quality. P 1 9 9   21:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused personal file. I can1t see an educational purpose for that, unless somebody wants to use if as an example for a distorted image, but I think we have better ones... —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:09, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Newzacade (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Those logos are not used in any Wikimedia project and their descriptions clearly reveal the intent of the uploader to spam.

    Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Adnan.younus (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Unused logos whose description reveals the intention of spamming. No educational purpose.

    Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Commons is not your private web host. Sismarinho (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:17, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Logo / image for a company that is simply spamming on the English Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:17, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 22:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:18, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Uploader request - the wing takes up too much of this, and what we're left with doesn't really seem to meet COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:18, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Uploader request - the wing takes up too much of this, and what we're left with doesn't really seem to meet COM:EDUSE INeverCry 22:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   21:18, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:201-mayflower byJSJohnston.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 08:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:204-mayflower byJSJohnston.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 08:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:Yacht Reliance in Drydock.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 08:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Sanjaymjoshi (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    no permission

    2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 08:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Got Permissions

    [edit]

    Dear Admin,

    I obtained permission in Sept. 2014 from Dr. Manisha Khemlani, then Chief Operating Officer of Central Chinmaya Mission Trust, to release these images under "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)." I have an email from her as proof.

    Please let me know if I need to do something or forward the email to someone. Sanjaymjoshi (talk) 16:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    @Sanjaymjoshi: please have Dr. Khemlani email us by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. She will have to explain how she or the foundation came to hold the copyright on those photographs (copyright is usually held by the photographer). Storkk (talk) 10:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination - nothing from "Khemlani" at OTRS. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:Columbia & Shamrock II-3.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 08:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Evidence of permission is missing. Opening formal deletion request (instead of speedy) to give us more time: file is 10 years old and is used on numerous pages. Ariadacapo (talk) 09:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    •  Comment Original author quoted in permission died in 2014.
    @JuTa: Who was the original uploader of File:Liquid Oxygen.gif, which is the source for the currently-discussed file? Ariadacapo (talk) 09:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    It was uploaded by user:Littlebrowny~commonswiki with source Australian National University, author Dr. Warwick Hiller and license GFDL. --JuTa 11:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination - the GIF was deleted for "No Permission". It follows that the png version has the same issue. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate of File:Kerem Avraham, Jewish workers.jpg Triggerhippie4 (talk) 09:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://resize.blogsys.jp/c5925f2143f8b6b2b80241a9cff6dfd9693c1293/trim1/0x0_857x320/http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/cacchan-inumaru/imgs/6/a/6a077f2b.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nom. --Yasu (talk) 16:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Date (1996) does not match the exif date, camera does not match images user has made on enwiki (deleted by me recently). I don't believe that this image is self-made. I've recently blocked them on enwiki for uploading a large volume of copyvio images scraped from various websites. Peripitus (talk) 10:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination - probbale copyvio of http://www.sakha.gov.ru/zvanie-pochetnyj-grazhdanin-respubliki-saha-jakutija. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    exif date (2009) and claimed date (2014) do not match. Camera is not one I've seen the uploader use on enwiki. User has been blocked by me on enwiki for repeated copyright violations. I do not believe this is a self-made image but is rather simply webscraped Peripitus (talk) 10:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination - http://www.terra.ru/zagorodnaya-nedvizhimost/rublevo-uspenskoe/barviha/info/. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    everything else by user Igor508 on enwiki or here has proved a copyright violation. I don't beleive that this image is self-made. I've blocked the user on enwiki for copyright violations via webscraping images Peripitus (talk) 10:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination - also found at http://www.liveinternet.ru/community/2359512/post240839971/ with a logo. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:40, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:Reliance & Shamrock III.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 13:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:Jsj-246-thistle.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 13:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplica of File:Cutter Genesta.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 13:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:42, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:Columbia & Shamrock I-11.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 13:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:Yacht Defender.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 13:43, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:JSJ-volunteer turning.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 13:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:Shamrock III in Drydock.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 13:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:Sloop Mischief-2.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 13:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I don't believe in own work. Higher resolution photos can be found via Google. Wouter (talk) 13:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    "Own work" created in 1902 and uploaded in 2008 seems very unlikely. Possibly old enough to be in the public domain, but truthful source, authorship and publication details are required to determine that. LX (talk, contribs) 15:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    "Own work" created in 1905 and uploaded in 2008 seems very unlikely. Possibly old enough to be in the public domain, but truthful source, authorship and publication details are required to determine that. LX (talk, contribs) 15:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    "Own work" created in 1902 and uploaded in 2008 seems very unlikely. Possibly old enough to be in the public domain, but truthful source, authorship and publication details are required to determine that. The claim that the work is in the public domain because it was published prior to 1923 was added by Quadell (rather than the uploader, who claimed to be the copyright holder). There is no actual information on the date or location of the first publication. LX (talk, contribs) 15:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused logo of subject with no apparent notability. Probably intended for the deleted English Wikipedia articles en:Moda entertainment and/or en:Moda Entertainment, created by the uploader and an anonymous editor (likely the same person). Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 15:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    no permission 2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 15:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:48, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use) Amitie 10g (talk) 16:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use) Amitie 10g (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use) Amitie 10g (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use) Amitie 10g (talk) 16:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Fair use (Fair use) Amitie 10g (talk) 16:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Huntster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is a composite image with data from NASA's Chandra and ESA's XMM-Newton spacecraft. While NASA works may be copyright free, works made by ESA are automatically All Rights Reserved unless specifically release. No evidence this is the case here.

    Better DR complex cases though I support deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 19:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    While this is not an endorsement for deletion, some additional comments are on and associated with the Category:Chandra images. The image is a great composite. I've already copied it to Wikiversity as Fair use just in case the decision is to delete. If anyone is interested in contacting ESA, especially XMM-Newton, about the free use of this composite, let me know I will be happy to help. --Marshallsumter (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    APOD from NASA usually has the copyright of an image stated directly below the image. See for example: NGC 5905 and 5908. But, the image from the day before RCW 86: Historical Supernova Remnant only has a credit line. There is no statement on the page per this composite that it is copyrighted for the XMM-Newton portion. --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Here's the APOD credit line: "Jacco Vink (Univ. Utrecht) et al., XMM-Newton: ESA Chandra: NASA / CXC". Here are the credit lines from the Chandra site: "Credit: Chandra: NASA/CXC/Univ. of Utrecht/J.Vink et al. XMM-Newton: ESA/Univ. of Utrecht/J.Vink et al." The key point here is "Jaco Vink" or "J.Vink", the operator of both telescopes (PI and et al. holding the copyrights for both parts of the composite). So, are you contemplating deleting a Public Domain NASA image? You or an OTRS volunteer can always "To request permission to use Chandra images, video or other media, please use our Permission Request Form. If you have further questions, or a special condition, please contact:
    Kathy Lestition, Education/Outreach Coordinator, (cxcedu@cfa.harvard.edu)". I hope this helps. --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    You're making a lot of assumptions. Lack of a copyright notice cannot be assumed to mean there is no copyright (especially with regards to APOD, which has a history of being pretty loose with such things, just like the NSSDC). Additionally, the idea that because the same investigator used data from both spacecraft, and one is NASA public domain so the other must automatically be public domain, is completely unreasonable. The investigator can, if they choose, release their work however they wish, but that cannot be assumed here. At the end of the day, works by ESA assets must be considered as All Rights Reserved unless specifically released. ESA is becoming more and more willing to release works as time goes on, but it is not yet de facto. Remember, Commons operates under the precautionary principle. Huntster (t @ c) 05:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Here's some additional info that may be of help. This RCW 86 image is used in L. Désamoré, "Ephémérides de décembre 2006", In: Le Ciel, novembre 2006, vol.68, p. 365-387, bibcode=2006Ciel…68..365D. On page 387, it shows the black and white version with (©NASA/CXC/Univ. of Utrecht/J.Vink et al. XMM-Newton : ESA/Univ. of Utrecht/J.Vink et al.). Here's his public email j.vink@uva.nl from url=https://staff.fnwi.uva.nl/j.vink/Contact.html. Perhaps an OTRS volunteer can contact him to answer your concerns. --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per discussion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    We don't need two of them. After deleting I will rename the cropped version like this here. Hockei (talk) 09:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:19, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    We don't need two of them. After deleting I will rename the cropped version like this here. Hockei (talk) 10:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:19, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    wird auf keiner Seite verwendet, wurde durch eine GIF-Datei ersetzt Petrus3743 (talk) 12:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:22, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution duplicate of File:051a-valkyrie iii.jpg Donan.raven (talk) 13:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    you cropped out the watermark, not duplicate. Slowking4Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 13:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: no valid reason for deletion plus cropping watermarks can be problematic. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I, as the author of the file, no longer want it to be shared with Wikimedia Commons. Avatar9n (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Casadeemparan (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    El primer archivo: * File:Discurso ante la Academia Nacional de la Historia de Venezuela por el acto de donación de la copia del óleo titulado - Retrato del Teniente de Navío Emparan - pintor Antonio Carnicero.pdf es un trabajo propio y forma parte de la documentación que soporta el contenido del artículo.

    Los demás archivos si pueden ser borrados porque presentan errores

    Graacias, --Casadeemparan (talk) 03:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    These do not seem to be own work by the uploader. N oevidence of permission.

    Stefan4 (talk) 13:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Sin evidencia de permiso. para más información COM:OTRS Alan (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Casadeemparan (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Small "own" works without EXIF

    2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 15:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:19, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in non-notable article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://viperson.ru/uploads/person/580515/main_image/page_Grinenko1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Its a copy from internet. on this site is this pic from 2013 with same object. 2003:4D:2C4E:5CA0:EC72:D2D9:BBC9:FB75 15:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://s3-media2.fl.yelpcdn.com/bphoto/o2_oSHpEKZPQDLUuijY9Sw/o.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.grips.ac.jp/cms/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/okutaninaka.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150802/images/30bhrSankyPath_164324.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This image is a logo owned by Football Malaysia LLP, no evidence that image is created by owner himself. Possible copyright violation. Danialrosli (talk) 15:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The bust was erected in 1962 [7]. COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such artworks, and although being PD in Japan, the bust hasn't yet reached 70 years of age. Yasu (talk) 15:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Statues on the Nusamai Bridge

    [edit]

    Statues created by Yasutake Funakoshi († 2002), Churyo Sato († 2011), Yoshitatsu Yanagihara († 2004) and Shin Hongo († 1980), respectively. Copyrights are still in effect and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow statues. Yasu (talk) 15:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Lemurian1 (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    no permissions

    2003:45:5C21:3401:D503:86A6:2B2A:9FE9 16:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: 4. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    No indication of free license. It is a 3D work, show PD-old doesn't apply is this case. C messier (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Konzeptmynchen (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Unclear whether uploader has any association with this group and/or whether he is the rights holder. EXIF of several photos indicates copyright holder with name different to uploader, and some are watermarked.

    (Google translation into German: "Unklar, ob Uploader hat jede Beteiligung an dieser Gruppe und / oder ob er der Rechteinhaber ist. EXIF aus mehreren Fotos zeigt Urheberrechtsinhaber mit Namen, anders zu laden, und einige sind mit Wasserzeichen versehen.").

    See also pre-existing nominations for two of this user's other uploads (and hence not included here):- Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Brothersinarms_zirner.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flammendereden brennendeplaetze.jpg.

    Ubcule (talk) 17:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by أحمد أبوغرفة (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    No confidence that any of these images, photos, diagrams, etc. were created by uploader, various sizes, no metadata, no source other than "self".

    Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Al-Hannadi (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    All of these images have over printing in the corners which shows another source than own. Probable COM:COPYVIOs.

    Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Image is claimed to be "by Matisse" but summary doesn't give traceable origins for us to determine copyright status (was it marked, where was it created, was it renewed, etc.). In any event, there's no evidence that it is the uploader's "own work" to put in the public domain. czar 17:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: More than a "simple text" logo to my mind Yann (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete The normal five-horn-star is in public domain, but these stars are not typical. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Beyond the general aspect of this file, and the doubts I have it is in the scope of Commons, I have strong doubts about the license. It seems that the base of this file is some sort of flyer, and I have extremely strong doubts that the uploader own its rights. Rhadamante (talk) 18:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Appears to be a cover or artwork by unnamed artist, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Appears to be mounted & photoshopped from 3 different images (like http://gfx.aftonbladet-cdn.se/image/16202851/1200/imageColumn/7bdb4bf7bdf73/27s06-hater-765) with unknown copyright status. Uploaded on 13.11.2015. Gunnex (talk) 19:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Brownsammy (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    COM:COPYVIOs. There is no indication of user's own work on these obviously rephotographed images, please check out the glare on some of the pictures and the face book sizes on so very many others.

    Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Logo of an obscure "minecraft server", out of project scope. Liance (talk) 21:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Please close this nomination sorry. Liance (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per Stefan2. --Yasu (talk) 16:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Aparentemente viola los derechos de autor C. Jonel [talk] 23:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: . --Krd 12:37, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    A photograph of copyrighted 2-D text, not covered by the right of panorama in the UK or the US Hchc2009 (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: FoP is ok for 2D "works of artistic craftsmanship", engraving is included in that. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Huntster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is a composite image with data from NASA's Spitzer spacecraft, the European Southern Observatory and ESA's XMM-Newton spacecraft. While NASA works may be copyright free and ESO works are Creative Commons, works made by ESA/XMM-Newton are automatically All Rights Reserved unless specifically release. No evidence this is the case here, regardless of the point of release.

    Better DR complex cases though I support deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 19:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination, http://www.esa.int/spaceinimages/Images/2008/10/Stellar_work_of_art. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Santoshkumar mehandale (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Seems to be some sort of personal content. See COM:PS.

    Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Ping User:Sreejithk2000 for confirmation; only person I can find who can read Kannada. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I can't read Kannada, so I have messaged the Kannada Wikimedia mailing list. I am waiting for a response. Thanks for the Ping, Magog. --Sreejith K (talk) 23:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: It has been over a month since the last message on this file and the materials look personal; Per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Huntster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is a composite image with data from NASA's Spitzer and ESA's XMM-Newton spacecraft. While NASA works may be copyright free, works made by ESA are automatically All Rights Reserved unless specifically release. No evidence this is the case here.

    Better DR complex cases though I support deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 19:32, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete lacks ESA permission so far for commercial use. The PD-USA-GOV template implying the image is solely NASA's work is clearly inapplicable. Unfitlouie (talk) 15:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Not own work - not licensed for reuse Nidentwiki (talk) 20:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplikat innego pliku: [8] Matlin (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Artúr Lakatos died in 1968 (see hu:Lakatos Artúr) Regasterios (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The image watermark suggests that this wasn't created by the English Wikipedia uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 21:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The watermark sources the file to a website. There's no evidence that the English Wikipedia uploader is the copyright holder. Stefan2 (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    See COM:DW. It is also unclear who the photographer is as that information isn't available on English Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

     Delete: the logo appears to come from this webpage and is unlikely the copyright of the uploader Ww2censor (talk) 22:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplication with File:Flickr - Government Press Office (GPO) - JOURNALISTS MOSHE ZAK AND YOSEF OLITZKY INTERVIEWING HAGANA COMMANDER AMOS BEN GURION.jpg and in poorer quality. We don't need 2 of the same picture. Ldorfman (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:38, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Author has requested content be removed CHOKRA LOVES YOU 22:46, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

    Are you "Koala Yip" the photographer ? If not,  Delete Unfitlouie (talk) 15:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Photo by Koala Yip, not own work. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Scan of a postcard – copyright protected content of Arba Editions http://www.arbaeditions.com/home-english , image by Alket Islami according to informaiton on the postcard Albinfo (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:50, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Ищетсяв Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад: http://rusnord.ru/oldnews/3425-31224.html, http://fd.ru/articles/156803-33-pertsa Dogad75 (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Doubtful own work claim. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Screenshot of non-free software with no evidence uploader has permission from publisher to release it under an open license. Contains enough icons/logos and other graphical elements to cross ToO. DMacks (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Creative/artistic icon from unknown source, but likely (based on uploader's en.wp and commons history) a commerical piece of software with no evidence he has publisher's permission to release license. DMacks (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Doubtful own work claim. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The file has been overwritten on English Wikipedia and it's possible that the copyright tag refers to the other file. English Wikipedia also mentions fair use which could mean that the public domain tag is invalid. Stefan2 (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Information on publication is missing, current PD tag however requires that. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    low resolution CHOKRA LOVES YOU 22:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)


    Kept: Media related to notable artist en:Chokra. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Author has requested content be removed. Courtesy CHOKRA CHOKRA 14:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


    Deleted: needs permission. --Basvb (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Author has requested content be removed CHOKRA LOVES YOU 22:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)


    Kept: Media related to notable artist en:Chokra. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Author has requested content be removed, Image copyright CHOKRA. CHOKRA 14:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


    Kept: deletion after author request will normally be done if this request is within a few days, not after several years. --Jcb (talk) 16:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Author has request this content be removed as it does not constitute as creative commons. The image is not being used as media for the notable artist CHORKA CHOKRA 02:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)


    Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 08:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Author has requested content be removed CHOKRA LOVES YOU 22:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)


    Kept: Media related to notable artist en:Chokra. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Author has requested content be removed. CHOKRA 14:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

    Do we know whether the uploader is actually the author and thus whether this file is validly released? Basvb (talk) 21:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: deletion after author request will normally be done if this request is within a few days, not after several years - to uploader: don't nominate the file for deletion again if you can't provide a valid rationale - to colleagues: feel free to tag as {no permission} if you feel there is a permission problem. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Author has requested removal of their work as they have not authorized permission for their artwork to appear under creative commons. The request appears after few years, since image has not been use in the article for notable artist en:Chokra since 2012 CHOKRA 02:54, 10 July 2016 (UTC)


    Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 08:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    copyvaio – The published information on this website and works are copyrighted. See [9] (2) Urheberrecht Steindy (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: Below German TOO. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Estshum (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Appear to be derivatives of non-free copyrighted work (i.e. the screenshots of the proprietary My Heritage website/software).

    Ubcule (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Needs permission of copyright holder to OTRS. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:47, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Estshum (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    I believe that the text alone would probably make this fall under the "pd-text" (i.e. below threshold of originality) according to a reading of the Israeli position on the matter, but the image of the tree might not. Any opinions?

    (This is- I'm assuming- *not* the uploader's own work as claimed).

    Ubcule (talk) 20:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: Tree is copyrightable. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    It is unclear if the statement on the forum is a general permission release, or an exclusive (to the OP, or Wikipedia). I can allow user X to use all my images as long as they attribute my twitter account - doesn't mean that I allow everyone, even though everyone might be able to read that message. We need mere clarity here per COM:L and COM:PRP. Josve05a (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Comment: In the overall context of the discussion[10], the intent of the photographer Rochus seems to be rather clear to me. Anyway, as the URL of the photographer's website, which he asked to be cited, has changed, this might provide an opportunity to positively confirm the permission from 2005. --Túrelio (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    For me, too, everything looks fine. In a forum posting the later uploader Arnomane asks under the same nick for permissions clearly pointing to CC-licenses and also to the often forgotten fact, that the files here potentially can be used for commercial purposes. That’s the context Túrelio is speaking of, I think. --Speravir (Talk) 23:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: Per Turelio & Speravir's discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]