Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
_(3035249423).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![290 File:MrComedySam "Selfie" Feb 2014.jpg](#File:MrComedySam_"Selfie"_Feb_2014.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![321 File:הרב אשכנזי נואם בפני משתתפי "יום תמים לרבי".jpg](#File:הרב_אשכנזי_נואם_בפני_משתתפי_"יום_תמים_לרבי".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a screenshot from TV news instead of own work.--Koika (talk) 09:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Mys_721tx (talk) 12:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
This is a screenshot from TV news instead of own work. Koika (talk) 09:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Mys_721tx (talk) 12:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
This is a screenshot from TV news instead of own work. Koika (talk) 09:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Mys_721tx (talk) 12:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
sprek a.s.b verwijderen 83.101.15.145 13:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Le drapeau Français est à l'envers 109.31.98.198 08:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Désolé, je me suis trompé. Il est effectivement comme cela pendant cette période. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.31.98.198 (talk • contribs) 2016-02-07T08:18:30 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --JuTa 22:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Désolé, je me suis trompé. Il est effectivement comme cela pendant cette période. 109.31.98.198 08:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: DR of a DR?. --JuTa 22:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Love vashikaran specialist baba ji +91-9799895930.jpg
Files uploaded by Sr.Brasilia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, can be found earlier on web. Uploaded since 11.2015 for pt:Areado, Brazilian municipalitiy, including Google Street View images like File:Estacionar.jpg, historical photos, etc, most likely done by an "all-he-can-get" grabber, like File:EscolaEst.JoaoLourenco.jpg, grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/282444318553473/photos/a.697398920391342.1073741825.282444318553473/721163071348260/?type=3&theater (11.2015) or File:MatrizdeAreadofoto.jpg, grabbed from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/116958906 (02.2015, CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 by "Paulo JC Nogueira ") etc.
- File:BandaMunicipalAreado.jpg
File:MatrizDEAreadoem1904.jpg- File:VistaParcialAreado.jpg
- File:Mapa areado ampliado.gif
- File:EscolaEst.JoaoLourenco.jpg
- File:ProjetoArquitetonicomatrizAreadoMG.jpg
- File:MatrizdeAreadofoto.jpg
- File:Estacionar.jpg
- File:BiliotecaEEJL.jpeg
- File:Vista frontaldo-p´redio.jpeg
Gunnex (talk) 16:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sr.Brasilia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Sr.Brasilia and sockpuppetry via Sir.Brasilia. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.
- File:Escola Estadual João Lourenço Areado.jpg
- File:IgrejaAreado.jpg
- File:Bandeira de Areado MG.jpg
- File:Areado Brasão.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 15:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons policy, any composite image requires the separate images be uploaded, sourced & licensed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Blurry image out of COM:SCOPE, of "famous" rapper, so possibly heisted from social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Again self-promotion of a famous rapper, out of project scope. Achim (talk) 11:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Info: Uploader is blocked indef on en:wp. --Achim (talk) 11:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 16:24, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
No source of basemap, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
There is no indication of free license for this calligraphic logo at source, and it appears to be above COM:TOO.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edificio~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history.
- File:Hôtel Wielemans - chambre à coucher.tif
- File:Concert Noble - Salle de Bal.jpg
- File:Concert Noble - Salle des Fêtes.jpg
- File:Hotel Wielemans - façade.jpg
- File:Concert Noble - façade.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Specifically, uploaded version of this file, for which Zimbio credits Valerie Macon of Getty Images North America. —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 21:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Es urgente Humberto José Sánchez (talk) 21:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 07:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото вырезано отсюда https://www.google.ru/imgres?imgurl=http://forumimage.ru/uploads/20150529/143290371644953100.jpg&imgrefurl=http://igorlifanov.iboards.ru/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=405&h=600&w=800&tbnid=SwtexhgFmfmVMM&tbnh=194&tbnw=259&usg=__EpV_7i37qCGp97X4OG0r7poMf0w=&hl=ru&docid=QgY7nFBd3rL2dM, опубликовано http://www.artek.org/press_cents/news/detail.php?ID=8423 Dogad75 (talk) 21:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work - Using VisualFileChange.
This file was initially tagged by Jimmy Xu as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work from wikipe-tan, cannot be own work. Amitie 10g (talk) 09:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipe-tan is compatibly licensed, considering all the files and their copyright tags on Wikipe-tan. I am guessing that "own work" here means "I derived this file". The matter would be to satisfy the license terms of the original design, I think?Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- I've corrected all wrong entries. Should be o.k. now. --Túrelio (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Wikipe-tan_holding_a_welcome_sign(traditional_chinese_version).png GY Fan★ 20:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW // COM:PACKAGING Josve05a (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete The design in the first aid is above COM:TOO. --★ Poké95 06:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment I agree with the above and have tagged with {{Speedy}}. :) Riley Huntley (talk) 09:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the screenshot of poker apps which is under yun522.com . The author claimed it is under free license but there are no OTRS to back up the claim Thatonewikiguy (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, screenshot of copyrighted content. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the screenshot of poker apps which is under yun522.com . The author claimed it is under free license but there are no OTRS to back up the claim Thatonewikiguy (talk) 18:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, screenshot of copyrighted content. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the screenshot of poker apps which is under yun522.com . The author claimed it is under free license but there are no OTRS to back up the claim Thatonewikiguy (talk) 18:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, screenshot of copyrighted content. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
_(3035249423).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3035249423).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
An original copyright in Japan does not expire because Keisuke Serizawa died in 1984. Y.haruo (talk) 10:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, can be undeleted in 2055 (70 years from death). Taivo (talk) 14:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm not seeing a cc license on this site. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded for an attack page on en.wiki and has no conceivable encylopedic uses. Out of scope. Diannaa (talk) 02:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by No Palcoda Vida (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row since 04.02.2016 for pt:Wal Schenider. Considering also:
- File:O Globo - Arte no Quintal - 2013.jpg --> newspaper scan from 2013 (text and image: permission?)
- File:Wal Schneider no Prêmio Extraordinário do Jornal EXTRA (2015).JPG.jpg --> taken from https://www.facebook.com/169113359927526/photos/pb.169113359927526.-2207520000.1454850751./504670983038427/?type=3&theater (12.2015, by "Wal Schneider")
- File:Wal Schneider no Prêmio Extraordinário do Jornal EXTRA (2015).JPG (same image as above, exif available) --> here now credited to "Will Dubrok.", see also https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=710685672366762&set=a.710687785699884&type=3&theater (12.2015, by "Will Dubrok")
- File:Wal em tabuleiro do norte infancia.jpg --> most likely grabbed somewhere from Facebook and previously published via http://www.revistaguiadobairro.com.br/no-palco-da-vida.html = http://www.revistaguiadobairro.com.br/img/materias/no-palco-da-vida/familia-wal.png (last modified: 06.2015), credited with (transl.) photo by his family [of Wal Schenider]
- File:Espetáculo Dis Forme, de Raffa Barros (49).jpg --> taken from https://www.facebook.com/nopalcodavida/photos/a.1048877128467469.1073741866.234609506560906/1049212095100639/?type=3&theater (11.2015, by "No Palco da Vida")
.JPG.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Multiple copyright issues to solve, further details and permissions needed.
- File:Chica Xavier com Grupo No Palco da Vida.jpg
- File:Wal Schenider na peça Nossa Cidade.jpg
- File:Espetáculo Dis Forme, de Raffa Barros (49).jpg
- File:Apresentação da peça Memórias de Nossa Infância no Temos Palco.jpg
- File:O Globo - Arte no Quintal - 2013.jpg
- File:Wal Schneider no Prêmio Extraordinário do Jornal EXTRA (2015).JPG.jpg
- File:Wal em tabuleiro do norte infancia.jpg
- File:Wal Schneider no Prêmio Extraordinário do Jornal EXTRA (2015).JPG
Gunnex (talk) 13:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mygolymo egyls (talk · contribs)
[edit]All found online and likely not own work.
- File:سامح عاشور.jpg
- File:سامح عاشور نقيب المحامين.png
- File:سامح-عاشور2.jpg
- File:خريطة الموقع.png
- File:نقابة المحامين.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Busfbrasil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used + logos most likely derived from however copyrighted content. Related ptwiki entry 3x speedy deleted (user blocked at ptwiki).
- File:ESCUDO BUSF (2).jpg
- File:FORTE-relevo.jpg
- File:Logotipo-BUSF.png
- File:Emblema da BUSF-BRASIL.jpg
- File:BANDEIRA-OFICIAL da BUSF.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 11:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image Basvb (talk) 12:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal/advert images.
Basvb (talk) 13:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Freakmuzik2008 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images/advertisement for out of scope performer?
- File:Klk.gif
- File:Poesiealbum1.jpg
- File:LADABA-logo.jpg
- File:Frkmzk logo.jpg
- File:Auftritt im nightlife.jpg
- File:FRKMZK vol.1.jpg
- File:Bubba - L.A.D.A.B.A..gif
- File:FRKMZK Logo.jpg
Basvb (talk) 13:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hangsna as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo of photo FoP? Yann (talk) 13:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete FOP usually doesn't apply for advertisement posters, as they're not permanently attached there. --PaterMcFly (talk) 16:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Also there is a date in the poster so clearly not permanent (event is 10 days after time of taking). /Hangsna (talk) 16:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fiadaathome (talk · contribs)
[edit]We need permission for all of these images.
- File:KrisTV2014new.jpg
- File:KrisTV2013-2.jpg
- File:KrisTV2013-1.jpg
- File:KrisTV2012.jpg
- File:KrisTV2011.jpg
Basvb (talk) 13:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by James lacrosse 1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are used in speedy nominated article on enwiki. After deletion these are unused personal images.
- File:Jason Dobson Control room .jpg
- File:Jason Dobson .jpg
- File:Jason Dobson at Logo.jpg
- File:Jason Dobson 1.jpg
Basvb (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sainivishal93 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images
Basvb (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Logo of very small time youtube channel: out of scope Basvb (talk) 13:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
We need permission for this image. A larger image can be found at multiple websites including 1. Basvb (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Very small, no EXIF data, PNG so probable screenshots, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 14:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Makmediawebmaster (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.
- File:Advertising Agency Mumbai.jpg
- File:Ad agency.jpg
- File:Creative Advertising Agency Pune.jpg
- File:Outdoor Advertising Agency Pune.jpg
- File:Advertising Agency Pune.jpg
- File:Brand Consulting Pune.jpg
- File:Creative Ad Agency In Pune.jpg
- File:Advertising Agencies In Pune.jpg
- File:Advertising Agency In Pune.jpg
- File:Ad agency in pune.jpg
Basvb (talk) 15:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.
- File:Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport ,Mumbai..jpeg
- File:Images stem cell puripotency.jpg
- File:Galaxy gear.jpg
- File:CCNP LAB MANUAL.pdf
- File:Microcontroller.gif
- File:Microcontroller.pdf
Basvb (talk) 15:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dolphidownload15 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.
- File:Dolphin download.jpg
- File:CPI Installation.jpg
- File:CPI advertising.jpg
- File:Dolphin Apps Store.jpg
Basvb (talk) 15:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Derivative of mostly unfree work Basvb (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo of questionable educational usability. This logo might be considered advertising content, which would mean that it is out of scope. If you believe that this logo could be used for an educational purpose (for example in a Wikipedia article) please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.
- File:Vitrum Smart Switches.jpg
- File:Full Control at your fingertip.jpg
- File:Vda group smart buildings logo.jpg
Basvb (talk) 15:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Doubts about whether in scope as well Basvb (talk) 15:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LaunchGuru (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.
- File:LGLOGO.png
- File:Android Applications.jpg
- File:Search Marketing.jpg
- File:SocialMedia Marketing.jpg
- File:DH1.jpg
- File:SEO1.jpg
- File:Launchguru.png
- File:WEB1.jpg
Basvb (talk) 15:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nischal bhandari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 10:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nischal bhandari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 08:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nischal bhandari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Yet more vanity images from this user. Commons is not Facebook.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Promotional description Basvb (talk) 15:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Go---ToxSick---go (talk · contribs)
[edit]This book looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.
- File:Shool Advertising of the European Bank , Deutsche Bundesbank 6.jpg
- File:Shool Advertising of the European Bank , Deutsche Bundesbank 7.jpeg
- File:Shool Advertising of the European Bank , Deutsche Bundesbank 5.jpg
- File:Shool Advertising of the European Bank , Deutsche Bundesbank 3.jpg
- File:Shool Advertising of the European Bank , Deutsche Bundesbank 4.jpg
- File:Shool Advertising of the European Bank , Deutsche Bundesbank 2.jpg
- File:Shool Advertising of the European Bank , Deutsche Bundesbank 1.jpg
- File:Shool Advertising of the European Bank , Deutsche Bundesbank.jpg
Basvb (talk) 15:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
derivative of unfree work. Basvb (talk) 15:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Group photo at a wedding used as userpage photo, can't realistically be a real self-portrait. Nemo 15:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Novo Altum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Novo Altum logo.png
- File:First Novo Altum Logo.png
- File:Novo-altum-logo.png
- File:Novo Altum Logo.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Salehhelen7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond.
- File:THE BIOGRAPHY OF THE INCUBATORS YOUTH NETWORK ...jpg
- File:THE BIOGRAPHY OF THE INCUBATORS YOUTH NETWORK.jpg
Basvb (talk) 15:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No license. Probable copvio. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 49.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 48.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 47.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 46.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 45.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 44.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 43.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 42.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 41.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 40.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 39.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 36.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 38.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 37.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 35.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 34.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 33.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 31.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 32.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 30.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 29.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 28.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 27.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 26.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 23.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 24.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 25.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 22.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 21.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 19.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 20.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 18.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 17.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 16.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 15.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 14.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 12.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 13.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 11.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 10.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 09.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 08.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 06.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 07.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 05.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 04.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 03.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 01.pdf
- File:كتب الؤلف والباحث سامي ندا جاسم الدوري 02.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond.
Basvb (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The files look suspicious, and I'm not sure if all of the files are in scope either. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIOs. No confidence that any of these small apparent screenshots and television pictures is own work of uploader. One is labeled "CD cover", and so on.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of logo by Deviant Art artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused, private photo. Likely photo of a minor. Ankry (talk) 18:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emmett Habittant 11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Emmett Habittant 11. Historical paintings may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided.
- File:Anne lui.jpeg
- File:Pirates sepia engraving drawings Dant S. Leon edward teach 1920x1080 71563 copy.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 18:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 19:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 20:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No source. Doesn't seem to be on the company's website. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:AnaMMedeiros. Most likely grabbed somewhere from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 20:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 20:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal(?) image. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 20:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 20:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. The uploader claims that he or she personally created all these photos and logotypes. That seems unlikely given the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and previous publications found elsewhere.
- File:Vista Int. Geral.2.jpg – taken with a Sony DSC-F828 on 2007-10-14
- File:Logos atm elis minimo.png
- File:Logo Atmosfera Elis.png
- File:Uniforme Hospital.JPG – taken with a Canon EOS 40D on 2008-02-07
- File:Uniforme Clinica 2.JPG – taken with a Canon EOS 40D on 2008-02-07
- File:Uniforme Clinica.JPG – taken with a Canon EOS 40D on 2008-02-07
- File:Uniformes agro.jpg – http://www.atmosfera.com.br/site/agrobusiness.php
- File:Epis agro.jpg – http://www.atmosfera.com.br/site/agrobusiness.php
- File:EsterilizaçãoATM.jpg
- File:SO 27L.jpg – blatant copyvio from Getty Images
- File:SO 91L.jpg – http://gty.im/rbso_91
- File:SO 37M.jpg – http://gty.im/rbso_37
- File:SO 22M.jpg – http://gty.im/rbso_22
- File:Sala limpa.4.jpg – taken with a Sony DSC-F828 on 2008-01-15
- File:Mop póAlta.jpg – taken with a Sony Cybershot on 2004-08-25
- File:Mop vista geral molhado 2Alta.jpg – taken with a Sony Cybershot on 2004-09-09
- File:Lençol2Alta.jpg – taken with a Sony Cybershot on 2004-08-31
- File:INDATM.jpg – taken with a Sony DSC-F828 on 2007-03-28
- File:Hotelaria.jpg – taken with a Sony DSC-F828 on 2007-03-27
- File:Hospitalar.jpg – taken with a Sony DSC-F828 on 2008-01-15
- File:DIAD EXT.jpg – taken with a Sony Cybershot on 2006-02-14
- File:Grupo Elis.png
- File:Vista Externa prédio.jpg – taken with a Sony DSC-F828 on 2007-11-06
- File:Vista externa fabrica.jpg – taken with a Sony DSC-F828 on 2007-03-28
—LX (talk, contribs) 21:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Used for a page deleted at Wikipedia. MBisanz talk 21:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedrohgonçalves (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 10.2015, the photos were previously published via https://www.flickr.com/photos/98982680@N08/17118507381/ (04.2015) + https://www.flickr.com/photos/98982680@N08/20901918774/ (09.2015) under "© All rights reserved by "Pedro Henrique Gonçalves".
Despite of having a similar username, the Flickr user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.
Gunnex (talk) 21:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joaobarreto123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (cropped) resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded on 27.10.2015. Most likely taken from a social media/institucional site like http://www.alfamed.com (Copyright 2015 © Todos os direitos reservados).
Gunnex (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ari Garmendz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fuera del alcance del proyecto.
- File:In the locker room.JPG
- File:Out of the darks.JPG
- File:Out for a drive.JPG
- File:Acting life.JPG
- File:Actor dominicano posando.JPG
- File:Relaxing at home.JPG
- File:YO y sólo yo.JPG
- File:My life every day.JPG
- File:Acting for film.JPG
- File:At the Bronx.JPG
- File:Filmmaker life.JPG
- File:Selfish of me after a long day of work.JPG
- File:Ari Garmendz From the Bronx.jpeg
- File:Director Dominicano y Americano.jpg
- File:Ari Garmendz.jpg
- File:Ariel Garmendz.JPG
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ari Garmendz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Commons is not a vehicle for self-promotion.
- File:Behind a great man there is a super great woman.jpg
- File:Ari Garmendz.jpg
- File:One Heart and one body.jpg
- File:Ari Garmendz insticts emotions.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Corresponding article deleted on English Wikipedia. Out of scope.
- File:PhotoGrid 1414050462997.jpg
- File:PhotoGrid 1413981106935.jpg
- File:C360 2014-03-09-18-43-45-069.jpg
- File:PhotoGrid 1415094042461.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guilherme Munari Faltermeier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Commons is not a private photo album.
- File:PhotoGrid 1443299227770.jpg
- File:PhotoGrid 1443476691079.jpg
- File:Guilherme Munari Faltermeier.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Some inspirational or religious quotation, likely out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ernesto Daniel Villasmil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 22:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Professional photo, found on Pinterest, unlikely own work Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Professional logo Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Franco de Oliveira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 22.10.2015 for pt:Carlos Augusto Holtremann Franco (1927—2011), a Portuguese flautists. Considering also File:Disco Carlos Franco.jpg (album cover) and File:Carlos Augusto Holtremann Franco3.png, grabbed from (example) http://www.gmcl.pt/repertorio/ (© 2011 GMCL – Grupo de Música Contemporânea de Lisboa) = http://www.gmcl.pt/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/gmmmcvv-1024x617.png (last modified: 2012)
- File:Disco Carlos Franco.jpg
- File:C. Franco.jpg
- File:Carlos Augusto Holtremann Franco4.gif
- File:Carlos Augusto Holtremann Franco3.png
- File:Carlos Augusto Holtremann Franco2.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 22:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal images/advertisement
Basvb (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
unused out of scope logo Basvb (talk) 13:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
unused personal image, border possibly copyvio Basvb (talk) 13:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused plain text file Basvb (talk) 13:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal images Basvb (talk) 14:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
6 months without a rename. Image has no useful description, no useful name, and without these is of no value, and out of scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Hystrix: No permission since 7 February 2016
{{BadJPG}}; 1:1 replacement available: File:LigninStructure.png. Leyo 14:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 09:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Hystrix: No license since 7 February 2016
Low quality (pixelated), replaced by File:Pomalidomid Bratton-Marshall.svg. Leyo 23:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 19:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Low quality (pixelated), replaced by File:Pomalidamid Fluorbenzoylchlorid.svg. Leyo 23:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 19:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Low quality (pixelated), replaced by File:Pomalidamid Ehrlichs.svg. Leyo 23:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 19:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
"ManagementJizzFizz" stellt ein vom BR gefilmtes Foto ein. Wohl URV. Jbergner (talk) 08:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 03:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Photo is copied from the internet. It lacks permission from the photographer and the artist. Considering the nature of this work, there's no FoP in this case. Ronn (talk) 12:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 03:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work. Antigng (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 03:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. but the description says that this is a 1904 book which would be PD-1923. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Only if it was first published in USA. --JuTa 11:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- The PD-1923 tag summary reads {{PD-1923}} - for non-U.S. works published before 1 January 1923. This is a 1904 book, published prior to 1923, not {{PD-US}} - for U.S. works published before 1 January 1923. And, in researching this, I find that Mr. C.W. Katiravelpillai, the author of the Tamil Dictionary depicted in the image, died prior to 1904, from https://archive.org/stream/no8journalofroyalco38royauoft/no8journalofroyalco38royauoft_djvu.txt "James H. Martyn, Esq., Ceylon. Life and Times of C. W. Katiravelpillai, by the Donor, 1904." If the book was presented to the society in 1904, Mr. Katiravelpillai, predeceased that date which would let us put a {{PD-old-100}} on it. In any case, it's not a copyvio. I would also point out that the book is rarer-than-rare and if the uploader has access to it, it would be an addition to the Wikibooks collection. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: license changed. --JuTa 10:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Sismarinho (talk) 11:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
unused personal files
2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 14:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ravji Khoda And Sons (talk · contribs)
[edit]unclear encylopedic worth
- File:R.K. 2 Ravji khoda And Sons (4).jpg
- File:R.K. - 3 www.rkropes.com -Ravji Khoda And Sons (14).jpg
- File:R.K. - 2 Deluxe www.rkropes.com -Ravji Khoda And Sons (2).jpg
- File:R.K. - 2 Deluxe www.rkropes.com -Ravji Khoda And Sons (3).jpg
- File:R.K. - 2 PE Rope (7).jpg
- File:R.K. -1 Red Wood Color (3).jpg
- File:R.K. -1 Red Wood Color (2).jpg
- File:R.K. -1 Red Wood & Brown (1).jpg
- File:Ravji Khoda And Sons - www.rkropes.com 11.jpg
- File:Ravji Khoda And Sons.JPG
- File:Balck Rope 1200 Ft - ravji Khoda And Sons.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 14:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused vanity photo of non-notable person Richard Avery (talk) 14:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
own work ??? 2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 14:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 14:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. Plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
photos of photos, no permission
2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 15:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. Plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. Plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. Plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Also doubts about permission. Basvb (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Also plain-text Basvb (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Also needs permission if in scope. Basvb (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
unused personal files
2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 15:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
_sm_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:23, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Another duplicate of this files: Lolis at Tribeca Thatonewikiguy (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 17:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- + (full frame)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 22:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Not own work (considering the ©) and out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 22:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 22:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 22:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 04:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятников нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 07:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low definition, poor quality PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete: I've got to agree. Even if one cropped the image the resulting aircraft image is of little use and there are better Ryanair images available. Ww2censor (talk) 16:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
tv series logo with copyright ☣Banjo tell me 18:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- maybe not the logo, but the background is obviously copyrighted. Delete. --Don-kun (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Christian Ferrer. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MoiraMoira as no permission (No permission since)
Keep Below COM:TOO. Josve05a (talk) 21:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep That's right. This logo was originally designed and published in Canada and is clearly simple enough for that. 86.84.247.233 16:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and not own work. Uploaded on 27.10.2015 for pt:Théodore Géricault, the file was grabbed from http://www.palacioajuda.pt/pt-PT/coleccoes/pintura/ContentDetail.aspx?id=254 (credit: "Foto Manuel Silveira Ramos IMC/PNA", © Todos os direitos reservados) = http://www.palacioajuda.pt/Data/ContentImages/Estudo%20da%20cabe%C3%A7a%20de%20preto%20180-%20IPPAR%20DCD%20fotMa.jpg (last modified: 2009). Historical paintings may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 21:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- The relevant information seems to be on the source page. I added it to the description page. It is a very small image of poor quality, but it's apparently the only image Commons has of this painting at the moment, so I suppose Commons could keep it until we get a better image. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --> thx, @Asclepias: for the input. Gunnex (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Calebjbaker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.redditmedia.com/UWJf9e8V9ZWbFqifll9cyGdn8eNsawbQh9C8LaEIsDE.jpg?w=320&s=77e05bcb95902eb92b678c49e54fa124.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader nominated the file for speedy deletion, that means, he also agrees to delete the files. Two first files were deleted, because uploader and author were different (author was Tom Baker). Taivo (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bond Fields Brokers (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Bond Fields Brokers/sandbox).
- File:Study @ University of Dubai.png
- File:Ud logo.jpg
- File:Bond Feilds Brokers LLC.jpg
- File:Bond Fields Logo.png
MER-C 13:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
6 months without a rename. Image has no useful description, no useful name, and without these is of no value, and out of scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Hystrix; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 11:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete not of use to Commons WayneRay (talk) 17:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused pure text PDF: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Taken from youtube video without credit. Possible copyright violation. Takeaway (talk) 03:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation. If uploader is the copyright holder, please confirm with COM:OTRS to have the file undeleted. --Storkk (talk) 14:16, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal photo: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Unused personal photo: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 14:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cowlibob as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Apparent copyright violation. No clear evidence of authorship to claim CC 4.0. Looks likely to be a copyvio by a fan taking a photo from a magazine.. I deleted a lot of the user's uploads as covers of albums and also film posters. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: likely copyright violation. If uploader is the photographer, please confirm license with COM:OTRS to have the file undeleted. --Storkk (talk) 14:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: night satellite image for a Brazilian region. Uploaded by 1-upload user Várzeagrandense (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 2012. May be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 10:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If uploader is the copyright holder, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 13:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: See the uploader's name and the description. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: owning a copy of a photo does not mean holding the copyright. If uploader was the photographer, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS to have the file undeleted. --Storkk (talk) 14:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works
Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятников нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 07:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, there is no Freedom of Panorama exemption for monuments in Uzbekistan. Monument not likely PD due to age. --Storkk (talk) 12:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятников нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 07:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, there is no Freedom of Panorama exemption for monuments in Uzbekistan. Monument not likely PD due to age. --Storkk (talk) 12:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятников нужно особое разрешение, кроме того оно явно перенесено из одноклассников на первом фото есть логотип. Bobyrr (talk) 07:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, there is no Freedom of Panorama exemption for architecture in Uzbekistan. Not likely PD due to age. --Storkk (talk) 12:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted design. OTRS-permission from medal designer is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused small size logo. Above TOO, needs permission. Basvb (talk) 12:57, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
FoP. На Украине нет свободы панорамы Dogad75 (talk) 13:56, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: there is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Does not appear de minimis to me. --Storkk (talk) 12:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect attribution, circa 1920s file, needs evidence of free license Basvb (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Clearly from an American magazine dated December 1922... {{PD-US-1923}}. --Storkk (talk) 12:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama for 2D works in Russia. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
1996 statue (cf ja:園井恵子). Not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow statues. Yasu (talk) 16:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:41, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 16:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Also very missleading name. --PaterMcFly (talk) 18:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:41, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
We need permission for this image. Basvb (talk) 13:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused banner of questionable educational usability. This logo might be considered advertising content, which would mean that it is out of scope. If you believe that this banner could be used for an educational purpose (for example in a Wikipedia article) please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope. --BrightRaven (talk) 13:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
More TICS spam Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Rocio Oquendo, with the 50th Logistics Readiness Flight, inventories packages and cargos at the secure area logistics facility at Schriever Air Force Base, Colo 130115-F-OT300-345.jpg
[edit]
Because it is not current, I do not work there anymore since March 2013 and I also filed lawsuit against Schriever, AFB for sexual harassment and wrongful termination. I asked through my lawyer before to take this down but apparently my lawyer was not willing to do the best he could to get the best outcome for my case as he seemed to have been in cahoots with the Agency's representative. I now am left cleaning up the rest of the mess left behind. They know better than to continue to use my image publicly. It is misrepresenting at best. I ask to please get thing taken down, immediately! Thank you Rocio0627 (talk) 03:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- As this is not in use, courtesy deletions are possible. Please email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, so that you can discuss details confidentially, and then post the ticket number here for reference. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 12:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused file of no particular encylopedic value. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Football trophies
[edit]Per previous DR DR [1]; DR [2]; DR [3] Derivative works of football trophies created between 1969 and 2008; therefore all of them still copyrighted; missing licenses or doubtful ownwork in some cases.
Files affected:
- File:RecopaSudamericana1990.png
- File:Trofeo-mini-copa-interamericana.png
- File:Copa_Intercontinental.png
- File:Copa sudamericana.png
- File:Ind_intercont.jpg
- File:Coplibertad.png
- File:Copa Intercontinental Conmebol-Uefa.png
- File:Copa Intercontinental.jpg
- File:Intercontinental Cup 1974.JPG
- File:Intercontinental Cup Borussia Dortmund.jpg
- File:Mundial SantosFC.JPG
- File:Trofeo Copa Intercontinental.JPG
- File:Copa Intercontinental.svg
- File:Copa Intercontinental.svg.png
- File:Coppaintercontinentale.png
- File:Trofeo-mini-copa-intercontinental.png
- File:Copa Libertadores 1989 - Atletico Nacional.png
- File:Copa Postobon 2008 a 1014.png
- File:Trofeo copa sudamericana.png
- File:Trofeo Liga Colombia AtleticoNacional.png
- File:RecopaSudamericana1990.png
- File:Superliga Postobon 2012 Atletico Nacional.png
- File:Copa suruga bank.png
- File:Copa libertadores.png
- File:Merconorte.jpg
- File:Trofeolibertadores.png
- File:Trofeosuruga.png
- File:Copa de Oro Nicolás Leoz.png
- File:Copamast.gif
- File:Copaouronl.gif
- File:Interam vector.svg
- File:Mustang vector.svg
- File:Aguila vector.svg
- File:Libertadores vector.svg
- File:Trofeo sudamericana.png
- File:Supercopa Sudamericana 1997.jpg
- File:Copa Conmebol 1995.jpg
- File:Merconorte vector.svg
- File:Campeon colombia.svg
- File:Postobon vector.svg
- File:Copost vector.svg
Fma12 (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Should include File:Intercontinental Cup Borussia Dortmund.jpg as well. William Avery (talk) 08:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Is it possible to use the silhouette of the trophy in the case of the Copa Interamericana trophy, for example? I could simply turn all the files I've uploaded into mere conceptual pieces with no details to resemble any original file, they would be all creations of mine and wouldn't propose any license infrigement. This representation of the trophies can be seen in southamericn football clubs such as this (see upper right corner of the page). Would this still suppose a license infringement? I just don't want my files gone ☹
--Wikialien (talk) 02:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Wikialien I don´t know if the use of the silhouette is allowed, due to some of the trophies are (still under a silhouette) complex enough to be under copyright. P.e. the Copa Libertadores Trophy, or the Suruga Bank itself. - Fma12 (talk) 13:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep File:Coplibertad.png
- Keep File:Copa Conmebol 1995.jpg
- Keep File:Copa Intercontinental.svg
- Keep File:Supercopa Sudamericana 1997.jpg These four files are not copied and are original works of users, unlike the other files taken from websites or editing images without copyright in Commons. Regards. --WIKI-WOLVERINE (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- WIKI-WOLVERINE: Those four files that you mentioned, are derivative works of pre-existing trophies created between 1960 and 1997, so all of them are still under copyright. No matter whether some user renderize the cups himself instead of uploading images from Google. - Fma12 (talk) 23:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
The image itself and its metadata suggest it is a mere print from a TV program - which is probably copyrighted. It's the uploader's sole contribution, I might add. Victor Lopes (talk) 03:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Very weak keep It brought a hint of a chuckle to me, and it's not inconceivably useful for an educational purpose (e.g. on composition or whatever)... though closing admin may disagree. Storkk (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, created by software program at http://www.myzazzlecatalogue.com/wild-inspiration.html, see exact same hands in image with penguins; page marked Clive Littin & Associates Ltd (1991) © 2015 Auckland, New Zealand. All that said, this was a very clever use of that software, but please see COM:SCOPE. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, image existed years before it was uploaded to commons at higher resolutions- image search AuroralColibri (talk) 04:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No educational value. Does not illustrate neither island, beach nor nudity. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative of multiple images, we need source info on whether these images are freely licensed Basvb (talk) 13:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, the uploader's history, and previous publications found elsewhere.
- File:Cafe Pueblo.jpg
- File:Cafe Terraza.jpg – found in higher resolution at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1519341065010560
- File:Hotel Veronica Suite.jpg
- File:Urban Manor Hotel.jpg
- File:El Circulo Convention Center Facade.jpg
- File:El Circulo Convention Center.jpg
- File:Sitio Uno Pooldeck.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
No source for 2D work (photo). "Old book" is not a reliable source. 95.28.25.114 20:32, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
No source for 2D work (photo). "Old book" is not a reliable source. 95.28.25.114 20:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 20:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
(.jpg) Logo might be above the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 20:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
This has been superseded by File:Connecticut Highway 614.svg. The new version uses the proper specifications (rounded corners, etc) for a Connecticut highway marker. Imzadi 1979 → 20:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused (tif) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 20:47, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo. No clear scope. Might be above the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 22:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 22:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused (JPG) logo. No clear scope. Might be above the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 22:11, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- It's a self made logo for nl:Portaal:Klassieke muziek. No copyright issues, let's keep it around. Multichill (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per Multi. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
The picture is in use in several sites while no OTRS release approval has been received for it. The uploader is not an active contributor to Wikimedia projects (not even to his "home wiki", the one related to the pictures he uploaded), so there's no way he may see a message in his talk page, in the Commons or Wikipedia about it. We cannot leave this picture in the Commons in this situation. Please delete it. Ldorfman (talk) 22:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
response from the bullied uploader
[edit]
this is bullshit, and mr. Liron Dorfman knows it. the man should be disqualified, from keeping on deleting files for no reason at all. Adam Dobrzyński LoveWiki (talk)
- Why? Do I even know you? Ldorfman (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
The picture is in use in several sites while no OTRS release approval has been received for it. The uploader is not an active contributor to Wikimedia projects (not even to his "home wiki", the one related to the pictures he uploaded), so there's no way he may see a message in his talk page, in the Commons or Wikipedia about it. We cannot leave this picture in the Commons in this situation. Please delete it. Ldorfman (talk) 22:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
response from the bullied uploader
[edit]
this is bullshit, and mr. Liron Dorfman knows it. the man should be disqualified, from keeping on deleting files for no reason at all.
Adam Dobrzyński LoveWiki (talk)
- Why? Do I even know you, LoveWiki? I couldn't find any edit of yours in he.wikipedia... Ldorfman (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Also, this wok is a derivative of non free content. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified location. Fails COM:EDUSE without a proper description.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. No educational value. Takeaway (talk) 22:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
A file, temporary needed for Wikipedia games in Bulgaian Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vodnokon4e (talk • contribs) 2016-02-06T13:30:43 (UTC)
Deleted: Ok. Uploader requested. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal work, non-notable artist. Fma12 (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Not used — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megavolts (talk • contribs) 2016-02-06T12:31:11 (UTC)
Deleted: I fail to see the use of this. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amberrock (talk • contribs) 2016-02-07T20:55:16 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Logo original enough for copyright, I think. The copyright holder is probably the party in question, from which we have no permission. Nemo 15:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Natuur12: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:New Power Party logos
imagevio - mapy.cz JAn Dudík (talk) 09:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Mappy cannot make maps from OpenStreetMap and NASA images and information non-free (see at bottom-left). --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 20:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Derivative of multiple possible unfree works (the images on the left) Basvb (talk) 13:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I've cropped out most of them, and deleted the old version. Storkk (talk) 12:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination concerns addressed by Storkk. --Riley Huntley (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
foto mal editada Alcachofa1960 (talk) 20:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: If your image is "badly edited", upload a newer version or replace it with a similiar file. --Riley Huntley (talk) 20:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Previously published by the Golf Club depicted, see https://www.golfmatha.com/terrain-de-golf-a-lanaudiere and other uses on the internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. The version on Commons is larger than on the other site. It's also larger and less cropped than the other internet uses. Has EXIF data. Looks legitimate. The CVC, the Glissades and the Golf club have the same official address. The offering of this free-licensed version on Commons should be fine, notwithstanding the fact that other versions are posted elsewhere. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no evidence of an earlier web image of similar quality. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Images with copyright infringement.
Pablodiego15 (talk) 08:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Flickerwashed. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:56, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Skeptical of the "own work" assertion here given the availability of this photo on the web even after a very basic Google Images search. EricEnfermero (talk) 09:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- The user claimed on Wikipedia to be the subject's agent manager. It so, it's conceivable they might have permission to the originals that are getting sold on EBay. I'll leave it to the experts here on how cases like this are usually handled. Bagumba (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - identicle image on web dated 12 March 2014 14:14:11. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Not a notable pro wrestler. Commons isn't Flickr. Sismarinho (talk) 09:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Argue not valuable. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:00, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Certainly not "own work" created yesterday by his agent; he played for the Patriots >15 yrs ago. EricEnfermero (talk) 09:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- The user claimed on Wikipedia to be the subject's agent/manager. It so, it's conceivable they might have permission to the originals that are getting sold on EBay. I'll leave it to the experts here on how cases like this are usually handled. I will note that every one of the uploader's contributions has been contested to date.—Bagumba (talk) 00:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination- web image dated 12 March 2014 14:18:11. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused (JPG) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 10:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:04, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Mistirs.jpg
Small photos without metadata, uploader is not author. OTRS-permission from authors Pro Loco and Cornia Online is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
This image has multiple problems. At first, project scope. The photo is unused and Bram's ranch is not mentioned in en.wiki, no educational value. At second, copyright problems. The logo surpasses threshold of originality.. Place is unknown, but the user uploads mostly images about Italy and there is no freedom of panorama in Italy. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Bordering Com:Advert Basvb (talk) 13:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Own work ? 2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 13:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Own work ? 2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 13:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:15, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused inferior duplicate of File:Echo widget alert gray.svg ↔ User: Perhelion 13:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:17, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo/advertisement Basvb (talk) 14:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:17, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement banner. Doubts about own work background image Basvb (talk) 14:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio http://www.optimistic-traveler.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Optimistic-Traveler-sliiiider-960x540.jpgper nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:20, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 14:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused vanity image of a non-notable person Richard Avery (talk) 14:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no permission 2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 14:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I believe that this logo is too complex to be considered to be below the Threshold of originality and as such should be deleted. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo of questionable educational usability. This logo might be considered advertising content, which would mean that it is out of scope. If you believe that this logo could be used for an educational purpose (for example in a Wikipedia article) please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I am Russ Alben's son and I own this photograph of my father. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curlydog (talk • contribs) 21:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:27, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
This file looks professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:27, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused plain text file, and as such out of scope. If relevant plain text files should be integrated directly into the Wikimedia projects as text. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo of questionable educational usability. This logo might be considered advertising content, which would mean that it is out of scope. If you believe that this logo could be used for an educational purpose (for example in a Wikipedia article) please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:30, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:30, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Also: File:8-Euro Österreich Briefmarke.jpg based on this image.
Delete I don't see any evidence this image was or is freely licence the source website specifically holds all copyright per this webpage. The fake Austrian postage stamps File:8-Euro Österreich Briefmarke.jpg seems to be made from the same image and should also be deleted. We would really need an OTRS confirmation from the author. Ww2censor (talk) 15:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete: while the basic stamp design, with different denominations, has been in use since 1967, it is still in copyright for 50 years so should be deleted now and undeleted in January 2018 Ww2censor (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep JetBrains is a notable company. --PaterMcFly (talk) 16:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:33, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo, unclear copyright status. Nemo 16:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:35, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This is not the uploader's own work, but clearly a photo pf a computer screen displaying https://www.flickr.com/photos/eltb/6316725757/. While that is a free photo, it is only free if you abide by the licensing requirements, and we don't have a need for such an inferior copy. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Replaced. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:43, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://heritpage.co.uk/festivalofculture/images/sunnymelody.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - 22 June 2015 22:41:18 - http://heritpage.co.uk/festivalofculture/images/sunnymelody.jpg. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like d.gr-assets.com/authors/1442639967p5/6477283.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio 05 November 2015 06:21:49 http://m1.paperblog.com/i/344/3449631/resena-santos-lucifer-santa-tristeza-alexande-L-gvCxux.jpeg. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
unused (only used in sandbox of 2012) personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Personal image of acct abandoned 4 years ago. No longer in use. INeverCry 20:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from historical photo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:49, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://img.youtube.com/vi/bU2srODhfCM/maxresdefault.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio http://rebrn.com/re/porphyria-vampire-disease-520207/. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:50, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
![16:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/02/07#c-Mjrmtg-2016-02-07T16:25:00.000Z-File:MrComedySam_"Selfie"_Feb_2014.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:51, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
![00:51, 12 March 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/02/07#c-Ronhjones-2016-03-12T00:51:00.000Z-File:MrComedySam_"Selfie"_Feb_2014.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope: photo of screen of edit counter, not in use and uncategorized Basvb (talk) 16:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:51, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo which is claimed to be own work. Logos with an own work claim and which are unused generally should be deleted per one of the following reasons. The logo is either of a non notable subject or company and could thus be considered out of scope as advertising content. On the other hand: if the logo is of a notable subject, and might thus be in scope, than the own work claim is almost surely incorrect and as such the author and source information are likely false. Incorrect sources mean that essential information is missing. It would be possible, but hard, to fix this information as I do not know the original source. For potential usage of a logo downloading the logo and uploading it with correct information is very easy. Making reuploading when needed easier than finding already uploaded unused logos with incorrect information. Note that I do not make any arguments about whether this logo is above or below the threshold of originality as I believe that this logo should be deleted either way per the reasoning given. If you believe that this logo could be used for an educational purpose (for example in a Wikipedia article) and the attribution information is correct (or has been corrected) please respond. Basvb (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
bad-quality corrupted dupe of File:Capilla San Pedro -1.JPG, unused. /St1995 16:50, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Milad A380 talk 17:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep not out of scope. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Gehört ins private Fotoalbum, aber nicht in eine Enzyklopädie. -- Toni Müller (talk) 12:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- I do not think that this image is realistically useful for an educational purpose. -- Milad A380 talk 14:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per Milad A380. Riley Huntley (talk) 20:50, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:54, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is very low quality of the picture which do not fit the minimum requirement. The high quality replacement is at here : Local Body Tax (L.B.T) Thatonewikiguy (talk) 17:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:54, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Newspaper logo is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:54, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
If this is an award for a film festival, then it is not the own work of the uploader as it is a 3 dimensional object. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:57, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio, since this picture is surely not in the public domain ! TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:56, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- I guess not, but it's not so sure, because the film being depicted is from 1938. The director died in 1979 only, though. --PaterMcFly (talk) 18:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- There's no reason to think a French film from 1938 could be in the public domain. We would need proofs anyway. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:58, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of SVG. Fry1989 eh? 18:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:00, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. tag "V Gr...", and imho rather for promotional use, hence 'out of scope' Wikimedia Commons, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:00, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Redundant to the better quality File:CIMA_logo_full.jpg LukeSurl (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:00, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Derivative of text that is sufficiently long to meet the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. Not covered by any applicable freedom of panorama exemption. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
This is the job recruiment which are way expired for that positions. Also Wikimedia is not Linked in to post jobs Thatonewikiguy (talk) 19:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/Draft:Walletmix). MER-C 06:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope and unused. Uploader fails to provide evidence to justify keep. Unfitlouie (talk) 15:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Superseded by File: Localisation EPCI Arles - Crau - Camargue - Montagnette dans les Bouches-du-Rhône, France.svg (which is more up to date) Superbenjamin (talk) 09:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Superseded by File: Localisation EPCI de la vallée des Baux et des Alpilles dans les Bouches-du-Rhône, France.svg (which is more up to date) Superbenjamin (talk) 09:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Superseded by File: Localisation EPCI Marseille Provence Métropole dans les Bouches-du-Rhône, France.svg (which is more up to date) Superbenjamin (talk) 09:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Superseded by File: Localisation EPCI du pays d'Aix-en-Provence dans les Bouches-du-Rhône, France.svg (which is more up to date) Superbenjamin (talk) 09:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Superseded by File: Localisation EPCI du pays d'Aubagne et de l'étoile dans les Bouches-du-Rhône, France.svg (which is more up to date) Superbenjamin (talk) 09:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Superseded by File: Localisation EPCI du pays de Martigues dans les Bouches-du-Rhône, France.svg (which is more up to date) Superbenjamin (talk) 09:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Superseded by File: Localisation EPCI Rhône Alpilles Durance dans les Bouches-du-Rhône, France.svg (which is more up to date) Superbenjamin (talk) 09:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Superseded by File: Localisation EPCI Ouest Provence dans les Bouches-du-Rhône, France.svg (which is more up to date) Superbenjamin (talk) 09:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
The a might be above the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 10:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I don't think so. --PaterMcFly (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Above the TOO in the US? Whm... --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: below COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Please contact OTRS
- File:BOP ICON.jpg
- File:BLUE BOPPY.jpg
- File:BLUE BOPPLING.jpg
- File:BOP - applications.jpg
- File:BLACK BOP.jpg
- File:BOP.jpg
- File:BOPPY.png
2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 13:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional images, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
low definition (800 by 533 pixels), does not meet wikipedia standards PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
plase contact OTRS 2003:45:5C21:3401:2C4A:18F9:C999:CD0D 14:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be user's own work, small size, no exif and odd bordering, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EL_PRECIO_DE_UNA_PROMESA_NOVELA.jpg Perlagarcia1991 (talk) 18:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope, as well as copyvio (tagged as such). Riley Huntley (talk) 20:54, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
No contexts for the apartment Thatonewikiguy (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
הפרת זכויות יוצרים. סימן מים של אתר COL חב"ד ביקורת (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Google translation: "Copyright infringement. Watermark site." (self nomination). P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Please delete (replaced by File:Draft Proposal of the Osaka Conference Agreement (1).jpg). Not in use, uploader request. Thanks. Hausratte (talk) 13:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Hausratte: Wouldn't it be better to keep this one because it has multiple pages, possibly the entire document? --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- As you wish. Hausratte (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Small size facebook logo (likely many better duplicates) Basvb (talk) 14:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate page from File:Толковый словарь Даля (1-е издание). Часть 1 (1863).pdf. See s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД/Архив/3#К удалению: устарелые сканы. Vladis13 (talk) 14:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate page from File:Толковый словарь Даля (1-е издание). Часть 1 (1863).pdf. See s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД/Архив/3#К удалению: устарелые сканы. Vladis13 (talk) 14:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate page from File:Толковый словарь Даля (1-е издание). Часть 1 (1863).pdf. See s:ru:Обсуждение Викитеки:Проект:ТСД/Архив/3#К удалению: устарелые сканы. Vladis13 (talk) 14:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Согласен с удалением, если существует более новая и более чёткая версия. Dmitrismirnov (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Allison7086
[edit]I'm not convinced that all of the uploads by Allison7086 (talk · contribs) are her own work as claimed. All her uploads relate to schools and so the copyright of these images probably belongs with them. I made an enquiry on her uploads in November 2013, however this was not answered, despite a further upload since then. I'm nominating for deletion the most questionable files, which are as follows:
- File:SCDS campus photo - lower school.png – Low resolution and no camera metadata, so likely to be from a website.
- File:Middle school photo.JPG – Very low resolution and no camera metadata, so likely to be from a website.
- File:Upper school photo.jpg – Very low resolution and no camera metadata; stylised at the edges which is a common sign that an image is from a website.
CT Cooper · talk 17:56, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan на фотографирование памятников нужно особое разрешение Bobyrr (talk) 07:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Этот файл не свободен. Ng.newmello (talk) 16:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Qualifies as speedy deletion per copyright violation, tagged as such. Riley Huntley (talk) 02:55, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bruno Luiz da Costa Bulhões (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status. Claim that these official symbols (coat of arms / brasão + flag / bandeira) of several Brazilian municipalites were published or commissioned by a Brazilian government prior to 1983 ({{PD-BrazilGov}}) is not supported. Uploaded in row on 22.06.2014 with random sources. File:Brasao jangada.png has a "1988" (creation date?). No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law, mostly some years after official federal constitution, but see also this extreme case, where a Brazilian municipality created his official symbols in 2014: 81 years after emancipation...
- File:Brasao jangada.png
- File:Brasão de Poconé.jpg
- File:Bandeira de Chapada dos Guimarães.jpg
- File:Brasão de Barão de Melgaço.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 10:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also small and blurry images. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Сомнительная лицензия фото, фотография старая, это скан, время создания и автор первоначального фото неизвестны Dogad75 (talk) 13:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Appears in https://vk.com/photo-63204438_389422663 and http://ruskline.ru/analitika/2014/02/13/stojte_i_derzhite_predaniya/ Church destroyed in 1934. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom/COM:PRP. Scan of old photo, could be as new as the 1930s, original authorship unknown, may be taken from internet. INeverCry 17:57, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Лицензия, авторство и источник сомнительны. Фото до 1934 года, так как храм снесён в 1934 году. Атор фото неизвестен. Dogad75 (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom/COM:PRP. Scan of old photo, could be as new as the 1930s, original authorship unknown, may be taken from internet. INeverCry 18:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Лицензия, авторство и источник сомнительны. Фото до 1934 года, так как храм снесён в 1934 году. Атор и время обнародования фото фото неизвестны. Dogad75 (talk) 13:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom/COM:PRP. Scan of old photo, could be as new as the 1930s, original authorship unknown, may be taken from internet. INeverCry 18:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
And all Special:ListFiles/Gemaniggyy. The uploader is exclusively active on w:zh:柯劭臻 and related articles and might be the subject of the photo. However, it seems unlikely that the author shot one image with a Nikon D810 and the others with a Sony NEX-3. Also, who is YELLOW, which the EXIF states as author? Nemo 15:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Map by FoEME 2013a according to [1] Nemo 16:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
1982 photo, extremely unlikely to be in the public domain. I've written the website person listed in the source's website to ask for permission. Nemo 16:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted movie screenshots claimed as {{PD-USGov-Military}}. Likely to be license laundering. Sealle (talk) 17:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Joint Task Force Guantanamo has published a weekly newpaper, since 2002. I've uploaded almost every issue. For ten years or more every issue has contained a movie review, written by a GI, illustrated by a couple of low resolution, non-free, promotional images.
There have been earlier deletion suggestions, similar to this one here, from User:Sealle -- Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Wire Issue08v7.pdf, Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Wire Issue27v14.pdf. The non-free embedded images take up just a small portion of the files. If we had an image of a street, that included a movie theatre, and that theatre had movie posters in its windows, we wouldn't delete the whole image, due to embedded low resolution embedded images. Those embedded images would be considered "de minimus".
The earlier discussions concluded that these embedded low resolution images were "de minimus". Geo Swan (talk) 21:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- This thread is a consequence of attempts on ru.wiki to cut out the image from this page in order to place it in the infobox of The Martian article as a PD. I am not sure that such use is acceptable so I do not think these particular screenshots may be considered as de minimis. Sealle (talk) 04:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Okay.
I question whether mistakes on the part of Russian contributor(s) should alter whether we should consider the embedded images as not qualifying as "de minimus".
Alternative remedies would include:
- provide a link to the previous discussions to whomever tried to use the image of The Martian in the Russian wikis article on The Martian. If the Russian contributor's image use is contrary to the Russian wiki's rules, and this is explained to them, shouldn't their activities be dealt with by the Russian wiki's administrators?
- as has been done with other images, edit the pdf, replace the copyright image with either an alternative image, or a discrete note saying a copyright image has been redacted. I have uploaded tools for editing pdf files, so, if you think this is necessary, maybe you could consider taking care of this? If you aren't, why not go with alternative #1? Geo Swan (talk) 22:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- I went to ru:Марсианин (фильм). I don't think any of the embedded images from this issue of The Wire is being used in that article, at this time. So, I am going to assume that nominator's concern has already been dealt with, and their nomination should therefore be dismissed. Geo Swan (talk) 23:06, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Okay.
- "de minimus"??? really? If you wan to see the test in the articles you can crop this file without non-free screenshots ShinePhantom (talk) 05:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- This thread is a consequence of attempts on ru.wiki to cut out the image from this page in order to place it in the infobox of The Martian article as a PD. I am not sure that such use is acceptable so I do not think these particular screenshots may be considered as de minimis. Sealle (talk) 04:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep The copyrighted poster is less than 2% of the file - clearly COM:DM, as was decided in previous discussions on other issues of the same magazine, and there are no new arguments against keeping he file. --M5 (talk) 10:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- I wonder how do you count these 2% - looks like a gaming the system attempt. So, if you have a copyrighted file of high resolution and you want it to be treated as PD - all you need is to hide it behind other pages in pdf? Please count page not whole file. Anyway, I took a table from a previous discussion and compared two posters - one from an old issue and this particular one:
page
urlx y description [2] 259 206 Another movie poster, at 259 x 206 pixels hardly "normal quality". [3] 1182 662 A movie poster, 1182 x 662 pixels. This obviously is "normal quality"
- --85.140.6.114 13:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- The Martian artwork takes about 1/3 of the page and the file has 16 pages hence 1/3 / 16 * 100% = 2.08%. I don't know how have you got your numbers: copyrighted poster from previously kept file [4] is actually 749 x 346 px and [5] has composite of four copyrighted images with largest (blueish at right) at 517 x 584 px. And being enlisted in US military, getting assigned to editing the magazine and filling 98 % of it with original pictures and stories from your fellow service persons, only to sneak some small pictures from the movie doesn't look like an easiest way to "game the system" to me. --M5 (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This has nothing to do with "gaming a system" and everything to do with copyrighted images from "The Martian" and "Everest" movies inside a magazine and the entire PDF claimed as PD-US-Gov which is most obviously isn't. There were multiple uses of other likely copyrighted images throughout the publication as well. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of image over shoulder of presenter, not deminimus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. At about 5% of the entire image, this is DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Keep per P199. Riley Huntley (talk) 02:55, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly not DM, image won't work without the DW, not really anything else in focus of the image. --Krd 08:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I really don't see why this needs to be deleted. Keep per P199. Unfitlouie (talk) 12:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the image on the screen is by far the most important element of the picture, the one that catches the eye. This can not be considered DM, no matter of percentage. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:07, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that uploader created any of these images, text documents, posters and historical images. Without additional information and proper licensing, these are likely COM:COPYVIOs.
- File:Председатель Международного конвента российских немцев Генрих Гроут с родственниками Лизы Ф. во время демонстрации в Берлине.jpg
- File:Кандидат биологических наук Г.Г. Гроут с манекеном особи пелингаса, выловленного в Азово-Черноморском бассейне.jpg
- File:Выписка из протокола открытого заседания Областного Совета Омского отделения ВОСН Возрождение от 30 января 1991 года.jpg
- File:Мандат делегата Съезда советских немцев 12-15 марта 1991 года, г.Москва.jpg
- File:Чрезвычайный съезд немцев СССР. Плакат.jpg
- File:У калининградского стенда. Надпись на плакате Немецкая земля Кенигсберг это наша историческая Родина!.jpg
- File:Уполномоченный по делам переселенцев Хорст Ваффеншмидт и председатель ВОСН Возрождение Генрих Гроут.jpg
- File:Участники первой областной (учредительной) конференции советских немцев в г. Актюбинск 13 июля 1990 года.jpg
_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%84%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%B2_%D0%B2_%D0%B3._%D0%90%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8E%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA_13_%D0%B8%D1%8E%D0%BB%D1%8F_1990_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- (numbered for convinient reference)
For #1-#2 we have valid OTRS permission from the publisher (consistent with provided source).#3-#4 seem to be standard documents, not copyrightable. So Keep for #1#3-#4. #5 may also be too simple to copyright (information). I can't tell anything about the others as I do not understand what DR's author mean by "without additional information and proper licensing". Source links #3-#8 seem to be dead/invalid so I cannot verify whether the OTRS permission is consistent with the sources. Ankry (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC) - Checked again: the permission does not seem to be valid for #1-#2 nor to any other image listed here. Ankry (talk) 21:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all of them per nom and close this date. Unfitlouie (talk) 12:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 06:48, 21 March 2016 (UTC)