Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/07/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
![44 File:Nkb Ng说"我要开讲啦".jpg](#File:Nkb_Ng说"我要开讲啦".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![134 File:"Não sou conduzido, conduzo".jpg](#File:"Não_sou_conduzido,_conduzo".jpg){kind=link}
_in_low-income_area_Bulbul_near_Nairobi,_Kenya_(10543355195).jpg){kind=link}
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bosnischer_beschnittener_Penis_jung.jpg Alen12 (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- Troll nomination - David Gerard (talk) 14:46, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No rationale for deletion given. Jean-Fred (talk) 14:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted the file: Sorry, have not seen this page but the deletion was requested by the uploader itself. Uploaded today, deleted today. If you think I actioned wrong please overrule me. Raymond 15:04, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adrianao da costa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:14-Watema Feat Steevy Flow--NG COMMONS.ogg
- File:11.Quando (Feat. Delcio Dollar & Derio Pakas) NG COMMONS.ogg
- File:7-Aprender a confiar Rafaela 1NG.ogg
- File:01 Mika Mendes - Mágico-NG.ogg
- File:07 Te Amo (Exclusiva)NG.ogg
- File:Rich Gang Chris Brown Tyga Birdman Lil Wayne Bigger Than Life NG COMONS.ogg
- File:2 On (feat. Schoolboy Q)NG COMONS.ogg
- File:1-Gangsta Rap Bells Beat-Shine NG COMONS.ogg
- File:1 - BRINCANDO COM FOGO NG COMONS.ogg
- File:(INSTRUMENTAL) Nas Cherry Wine Ft Amy Winehouse NG COMONS.ogg
- File:01 Make Me Proud (In The Style Of Drake & Nicki Minaj) (Karaoke Version) NG COMONS.ogg
- File:(Official Instrumental) Juicy J - What The Fuck Is Yall On (Prod. By Lex Luger)NG COMONS.ogg
- File:(DiskreteProductionz) Jay z and Kanye West Watch the throne instrumental type beat (WAR)NG COMONS.ogg
- File:(Instrumental)Drake - Started From The Bottom (1)NG COMONS.ogg
- File:(Instrumental)Dj Liu One - 2 Street (Feat Prodigio, Monsta, NGA & Masta)NG COMONS.ogg
- File:06. Outra Metade feat Délcio Dollar (2).ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
weil es net so geht wie ich will und weilk monn es in googel findet aber nicht die hauptseite danke Schlomo 333 (talk) 17:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- See also: ticket:2015071210011737. --Krd 05:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request + no permission Krd 05:08, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 18:24, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- speedy
Delete, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escudo Tigres UANL.png. Gunnex (talk) 06:23, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 08:55, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
This collage is missing details of individual sources and licenses for the component images used. DAJF (talk) 01:23, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete + reupload = tagged with copyvio (part) via grabbed from internet = sock upload via Category:Sockpuppets of MWillians. Gunnex (talk) 06:11, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Dharmadhyaksha Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:49, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all since 11.7.2015 JuTa 03:35, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all since 09.07.2015. JuTa 03:43, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
File:Marc Randazza vs. Excelsior Media Corp and Liberty Media Holdings LLC - Interim Arbitration Award.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all since 11.7.2015 JuTa 03:45, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused private photo. No obvious educational value, so outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:07, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:07, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
somebody noticed me for discussion of delete.and also,spelling of his name was misspelled. Mi piace angeli (talk) 05:21, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:08, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Publicity photo widely circulating on the web. No evidence that this is the own work of the uploader as claimed. DAJF (talk) 01:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:08, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Phellipe soares (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work. Uploaded in a row on 03.07.2015 for pt:Gretchen, a Brazilian singer, all these (private / historical) photos were previously published via
- https://plus.google.com/105427979273300524878/photos (Google+ "Gretchen")
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/64913276@N06/ (© by "CACAU66")
- https://plus.google.com/108748959549750752699/photos (Google+ "Paula Moraes")
Examples:
- File:CANTORA GRETCHEN.jpg --> https://plus.google.com/105427979273300524878/photos/photo/5933547529927245346?pid=5933547529927245346&oid=105427979273300524878 (2013) or https://www.flickr.com/photos/64913276@N06/5910306996/ (2011)
- File:CANTORA GRETCHEN (1).jpg --> https://plus.google.com/105427979273300524878/photos/photo/5933548905785207698?pid=5933548905785207698&oid=105427979273300524878 (2013)
- File:CANTORA GRETCHEN (2).jpg --> https://plus.google.com/105427979273300524878/photos/photo/5933548974020580306?pid=5933548974020580306&oid=105427979273300524878 (2013)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Further details and/or permission(s) needed.
- File:GRETCHEN.jpg
- File:SULA MIRANDA.jpg
- File:CANTORA GRETCHEN (5).JPG
- File:CANTORA GRETCHEN (4).JPG
- File:CANTORA GRETCHEN (3).jpg
- File:CANTORA GRETCHEN.jpg
- File:CANTORA GRETCHEN (1).jpg
- File:CANTORA GRETCHEN (2).jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 07:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:PRP Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:09, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Possibily copied image & low resolution Adilswati (talk) 09:20, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:09, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- Reverted the deletion: nominator, nor admin, didn't do any checks. Undue suspicion. Clearly part of a series of other images by same uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:40, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
personal photo, mentioning home made unused file, only contribution of uploader. Havang(nl) (talk) 11:08, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
-2015-07-12T11:08:00.000Z-File:Hsepid_yob.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:10, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Uploads by TeeJiem
[edit]The uploads by TeeJiem are tagged as "own work" but are all taken from Andrea Brizzi Photography (compare for example File:University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine.PNG) and thus are likely copyright violations. Huon (talk) 11:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
At a closer look not all uploads come from the same source, but for most sources are identifiable:
- File:Hawaii 3.jpg was previously published here.
- File:UH-Cancer-Research-Center.jpg was previously published here.
- File:UH_JABSOM.jpg was previously published here.
- File:Bunnyglo0w.jpg was published by CBS.
- File:IBR.png comes from here.
- File:Hawaii_1.jpg, File:University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine.PNG, File:JABSOM 1.PNG, File:JABSOM 2.png, File:JABSOM 4.PNG are all from Andrea Brizzi.
I may have missed one or two, but by the precautionary principle we should assume the others aren't free either. Huon (talk) 11:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work and per COM:PRP Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:12, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 13:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from other images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from other images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Denniss Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:07, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Denniss Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:07, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
unused private image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:16, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maite arretxea (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:16, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IamJoewild (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Joe wild Stage.jpg
- File:Joe Wild Photo.jpg
- File:Joe Wild shooting 2.jpg
- File:Joe Wild shooting.jpg
- File:Joe Wild.jpg
- File:Joe Wild Ibanez.jpg
- File:Last.jpg
- File:Joe Wild Ibanez PGM301.jpg
- File:Joe Wild Toybox.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:18, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:18, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:18, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to Wikibooks if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:18, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:19, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blinkers182 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Ильшат & Теона - Звезда Танцпола (online-audio-converter.com).wav
- File:Радио Ваня - поздравление с 8м марта от лучшего танцора страны Ильшата Шабаева - (online-audio-converter.com).wav
- File:ILSHAT (Ильшат, Танцы на ТНТ) - Только тобой (online-audio-converter.com).wav
- File:ILSHAT (Ильшат, Танцы на ТНТ) и Граф - Верить (online-audio-converter.com).wav
- File:Ильшат - Слёзы (пианино) (online-audio-converter.com).wav
- File:ALL1 и Ильшат Шабаев - Страница (online-audio-converter.com).wav
- File:ILSHAT (Ильшат, Танцы на ТНТ) - BARERA (online-audio-converter.com).wav
- File:02 Граф (ALL1) - Аллилуйя (уч. Ильшат Шабаев) (альбом Одно Небо) (online-audio-converter.com).wav
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nacanvideos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Enfrentamiento.jpg
- File:PNacan.jpg
- File:Fantu.jpg
- File:Frente Femenino del FANTU.jpg
- File:Me golpearon varias veces.jpg
- File:El golpe que lo llevo a la muerte.jpg
- File:Wilfredo.jpg
- File:En el entierro de Juan Wilfredo.webm
- File:El Estudiante.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:23, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:23, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:23, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:23, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anush ANUA Babajanyan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising/promotional (see user page), out of scope.
- User:Anush ANUA Babajanyan
- File:DESIGNER ANUA SPRING PHOTO.png
- File:NEW PHOTOO DESIGNER ANUA.png
- File:NEW PHOTO DESIGNER ANUA.png
- File:ANUA 2.jpg
- File:ANUA FASHION.jpg
- File:Anua fashion designer.jpg
- File:ANUA look.jpg
- File:ANUA armenian v. red.png
- File:Anua 2013.jpg
- File:ANUA 2014.jpg
- File:Anua 2015.jpg
- File:ANUA 2015.jpg
- File:ANUA FASHION DESIGNER.jpg
- File:ANUA ANUSH BABAJANYAN.jpg
- File:ANUA.png
Achim (talk) 15:18, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, hardly a notable person. Image seems to serve self-promotion. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:26, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
![15:26, 12 July 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/07/12#c-Túrelio-2015-07-12T15:26:00.000Z-File:Nkb_Ng说"我要开讲啦".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
![09:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/07/12#c-Jianhui67-2015-07-19T09:20:00.000Z-File:Nkb_Ng说"我要开讲啦".jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Alberto enrique aldana mota (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alberto enrique aldana mota (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused private images, out of scope
Achim (talk) 15:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rashid puran shangla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, outside our scope
- File:1DFSDFF1001614 1607171256237281 4449703140474490189 o.jpg
- File:DFPicture2.png
- File:GG11539181 1610842009193361 889767609263146905 o.jpg
- File:D11406707 1610842469193315 1677560559759388932 o.jpg
- File:Aaness.jpg
- File:Mmu.jpg
- File:1`10151219 1381685102142345 3975855424822538121 n (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 14:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rashid puran shangla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private images, out of scope.
Achim (talk) 15:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:26, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
my mistake, should have been a category Marcus Manilius (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Aikido Iwama Mendoza (last remaining file) Gunnex (talk) 17:26, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is obviously a recent sculpture and thereby still copyrighted. Freedom-of-panorama exception in Spain covers only "Works permanently located in parks, streets, squares or other public places", whereas the depicted statue is located indoors. So, permission from the sculpture or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:26, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Henri Boisselier died in 1959, not yet in public domain in France.
- File:Musiciens pupilles Garde impériale.jpg
- File:Boisselier Génie 1830.jpg
- File:Boisselier Garde Nationale Paris.jpg
Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom Fma12 (talk) 22:35, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:26, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/klinsmann2011/5968002011/in/album-72157627140480027/ Looks like flickrwash for me, Original author has it as ARR Dudek1337 (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Liliane Funcken & Fred Funcken works are not in the public domain yet. Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Image taken from the internet. Of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 23:51, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:28, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Image taken from the internet. Of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 23:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:28, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Image taken from the internet. Of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 23:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:28, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Image taken from the internet. Of unknown copyright status. Takeaway (talk) 23:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:28, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
out of scope. Fixertool (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
German Railways logo is on Commons in SVG format and undistorted. Fry1989 eh? 19:44, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Appears to be a distorted version of File:Deutsche Bahn AG-Logo.svg. The SVG is much better, so delete the GIF. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:26, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Ich habe an die uhrheberrechte nicht gedacht - FRP ProtoType (talk) 15:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hatte ich nicht bedacht - FRP ProtoType (talk) 15:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
German Railways logo is on Commons in SVG format and undistorted. FRP ProtoType (talk) 15:18, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom George Chernilevsky talk 05:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Geraldo Commons (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Bruna tatiana (NG Commons Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:August Alsina - Downtown Feat. Kidd Kidd (NG Commons Music Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:August Alsina - Benediction ft. Rick Ross - YouTube720p (Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:09-Holy ghost.....Rick Ross (NG CommonsQualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:Rick ross street money (NG Commons Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:Rick ross (NG Commmons Alta Qualidade ).ogg
- File:Rick ross-blowin money fast (bmf) (Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:Rick Ross ft Lil Wayne (Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:Wiz Khalifa feat. Charlie Puth - See You Again (NG commons).ogg
- File:Rick Ross feat. Jay Z & Young Jeezy- Hustin(Remix)(low) (Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:Luan Santana -Tudo Que Voc阓Quiser (Novo DVD - O Nosso Tempo 蒧Hoje) (Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:02 - nada além do sangue66 (Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:Wiz Khalifa - Still Down (feat. Chevy Woods & Ty Dolla $ign) - (MP3Juices.to) (Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:16 Minha Crew(Ft. Emana Cheezy)(Bonus Track) (Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:Olha bem (Qualidade Alta ).ogg
- File:Wiz khalifa promises official video mp3 34366.wav
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
This seems to be commercial music. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.
- File:05. Downtown Life Under the Gun - Let Me Hit That (ft Curren$y)(NG Commons ).ogg
- File:04. Downtown Life Under the Gun - I Luv This Shit (ft Trinidad James) (NG Commons).ogg
- File:August-alsina-no-love-ft-nicki-minaj(NG Commons).ogg
- File:15- Plutonio ft Mana Grace - Plutonio (Prod. The NG Commons).ogg
- File:93 Tu és o amor....Yuri da Cunha (NG Commons).ogg
- File:Tchobari - Broto (NG Commons).ogg
- File:VAI -TE EMBORA (NG Commons ).ogg
Stefan4 (talk) 09:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Chris Brown & Tyga Ft. ScHoolboy Q - Bitches N Marijuana (NG Commons).ogg
- File:Chris Brown & Tyga -- Ayo ( NG Commons).ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguelmito (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Telma Lee - Eu Te Magoei.ogg
- File:Yuri da Cunha Ft. C4 Pedro - De Alma na Paixão.ogg
- File:Ary - Não Me Faças Desistir.ogg
- File:09 Master Jake Feat. Eddy Flow - Jajão.ogg
- File:Fica mole-JD ft Cage One.ogg
- File:Solidão(Remix)-Puto Portugues.ogg
- File:Emhlabeni (Original)-Andyboi.ogg
- File:Staff Paulo feat Gaia Beat & Dj Ricardo Orange - Sapeleme (Original Mix).mp3.ogg
- File:Eliminado(Feat.Mestre Dangue)-Dj Habias.ogg
- File:Dj Vado Poster & Dj Didinho Feat. Mulunda & Jack Jazz - Me arrepeio(Remix).ogg
- File:Dj Darcy feat. Daniel Nascimento, Preto Show e Maya Zuda - Wawéra (Afro House).ogg
- File:Dj Callas Feat. Zoca Zoca, Yola Araújo & Eva Rap Diva - Hey Hey (Afro House) (Prod. Gaia Beat).ogg
- File:07 Banzelo-Os Banah ft Dj Vado Poster.ogg
- File:01 Impro (Original).ogg
- File:See You Again(Feat. Charlie Puth)-Wiz Khalif.ogg
- File:Tanta nkento-Kyaku Kadaff.ogg
- File:Makongo (Feat.Paulo Flores) (Semba).ogg
- File:Assim é Que é-Ary.ogg
- File:Bibi-Kyaku Kadaff.ogg
- File:03 Isso e bom-Mika Cabral.ogg
- File:Voçe Me Abana-Yola Semedo.ogg
- File:03 relogio biologico-Kyaku Kadaff.ogg
- File:Vamos Ficar Por Aqui (Zouk)-C4 Pedro.ogg
- File:01 Celebrando El Dia ( ft. Tania )-Calo Pascoal.ogg
- File:Gago (Semba)-Yuri Da Cunha.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguelmito (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Bryan Addan.ogg
- File:Yola Semedo - Dont Doubt By NuchO----.ogg
- File:Yuri Da Cunha - Gago (Semba).ogg
- File:When you believe.ogg
- File:So voce.ogg
- File:Meu segredo.ogg
- File:Lionel-richie---lady.ogg
- File:Forever young.ogg
- File:Careless whisper.ogg
- File:Army´s Squad & Heavy C - Cabeça vazia.ogg
- File:19- When you Believe -------- Whitney Huston.ogg
- File:14 Com Todos Molhos.ogg
- File:04 - L Aurora.ogg
- File:09 podes bazar+.ogg
- File:Edmazia - Meu Herói ( 2o14 ).ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguelmito (talk · contribs)
[edit]These seem to be commercial music. No evidence of permission.
Stefan4 (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete = I tagged all files with copyvio because
Mass deletion of files added by User:Miguelmito: All files (music) grabbed from Internet = mass uploads of copyrighted works from users from Angola --> Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Miguelmito + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Geraldo Commons + Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wizard gang + User talk:Nurio Adriano + multiple other related mass DRs/copyvios. Action is Facebook coordinated, see e.g. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Wikimedia-Angola/1848698408688885 - + https://www.facebook.com/groups/1553180724893584/ + https://www.facebook.com/pages/Wikimedia-Angolla/439553186121930 + etc.
- Related:
- Gunnex (talk) 22:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:44, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
While this is an extremely nice photo, it has no description, source or author and as such I'm nominating it in the hopes that some or all of those fields could be filled in and the image retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:39, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Besides, the image itself is clear enough to tell us what it is: a fare box on a Chinese bus. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Per OTRS 2015071210008689 no permission is available - the individual hoped that its age (32 or 42 years, they aren't sure), would be old enough to make it PD, but it is not old enough Sphilbrick (talk) 22:25, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
It is impossible to obtain permission because the Hop Frog closed down in 1983 and nobody knows who to ask around. The logo is older than 32 years, probably 41. If this isn't sufficient, delete this media.
Sorry if that caused problems.
rb
Deleted: . JuTa 18:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
German Railways logo is on Commons in SVG format and undistorted. Fry1989 eh? 19:44, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:28, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
This file is apparently mislabelled, per a message on the talk page of the Smallpox vaccine English Wikipedia article. Apparently the bottle contains an extract from a flower, not smallpox variolation solution. I will write a message on the Pakistan noticeboard on the English Wikipedia to provide confirmation and also to establish if this image is useful. Graham87 (talk) 08:34, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: The large letters (روح کیوڑا) are in Nastaliq style script, the most common style for writing Urdu labels. Google Translate renders the first word (روح) as 'spirit'; the second word (کیوڑا) as 'Fragrant Screw Pine' and the phrase as 'The fragrant screw pine'. An Urdu-to-English dictionary indicates that روح(ruh) can also mean essence. YBG (talk) 02:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Keep No reason to delete: Image is useful, more so if its actual contents are ascertained. If the filename is problematic, then rename to something like Vintage Vial with Arabic Label.jpg. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:48, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- If that route is taken, the label should be
Vintage vial with Urdu label.jpg. YBG (talk) 02:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)- Well said, although I meant Arabic script, not necessarily Arabic language. Meanwhile, I went bold and renamed it to File:روح کیوڑا.jpg and added Category:Signage errors. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:01, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- If that route is taken, the label should be
- Keep The image is taken from the CDC website where it is labeled as containing smallpox. If it is NOT mislabeled, we should keep it to use in en:Smallpox vaccine. it IS in fact mislabeled, then the mislabeling itself is rather interesting and could be the subject of an article. YBG (talk) 02:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I have no idea what could be inside the bottle, but as an Urdu-speaker, I can confirm the label says "rooh kewra", and the Urdu translation provided by YBG is correct. A bit off-topic, Kewra flower extract is often used to make Rooh Afza. Mar4d (talk) 11:29, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Before starting this discussion, I emailed the CDC about this image; I've just received a response from them indicating that they have hidden it from public view due to the translation mismatch. Indeed, the link on the image source page now goes to a different image. Graham87 (talk) 16:47, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I've removed this image from the articles it appears in. They were:
Misleading title with incorrect identification of subject matter. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:03, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Just to make sure: Are you nominating only the redirect or also the target file (File:روح کیوڑا.jpg)? --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:22, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, only the redirect. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:28, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as a misleading redirect. Graham87 (talk) 01:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused private image, out of scope. Achim (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Mauvaise qualité A VIE SAINE (talk) 14:15, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no better equivalent available. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Historical newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:RAMONES CRAMPS.jpg
- File:BONE SYMPHONEY.jpg
- File:BRADLEY FRIEDMAN.jpg
- File:WHISKEY0000.pdf
- File:RAMONES BERLIN CRAMPS0000.pdf
- File:MODERN MUSIC0001.pdf
- File:MODERN MUSIC0000.pdf
- File:IVMF0007.pdf
- File:IVMF0006.pdf
- File:IVMF0005.pdf
- File:IVMF0004.pdf
- File:IVMF0003.pdf
- File:IVMF0002.pdf
- File:IVMF0001.pdf
- File:IVMF0000.pdf
- File:COCK ROBIN0000.pdf
- File:BRADLEY FRIEDMAN0001.pdf
- File:BRADLEY FRIEDMAN0000.pdf
- File:BONE SYMPHONY0000.pdf
- File:BILLBOARD 3RD0000.pdf
- File:BILLBOARD 3RD VIDEO0003.pdf
- File:BILLBOARD 3RD VIDEO0002.pdf
- File:BILLBOARD 3RD VIDEO0001.pdf
- File:BILLBOARD 3RD VIDEO0000.pdf
- File:Bradley Friedman.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
I created it by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 16:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
poor quality, no need to take this "Blattlauslöwe" longer NobbiP 22:37, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: superseded by other images in same series. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
poor quality, no need to take this "Blattlauslöwe" longer NobbiP 22:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: In use in en:Wikipedia. Why not try to update with a better picture instead? --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: in use, no alternative. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:47, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
poor quality, no need to take this "Blattlauslöwe" longer NobbiP 22:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: In use in en:Wikipedia. Why not try to update with a better picture instead? --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: in use, no alternative. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:47, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
poor quality, no need to take this "Blattlauslöwe" longer NobbiP 22:39, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: In use in en:Wikipedia. Why not try to update with a better picture instead? --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:43, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- for me its no "must to delete" this or one/all of the other 3 pics. Keep it if you like. But none of these is in use neither in "en" nor in one of the other wikis. NobbiP 17:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: in use, no alternative. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
COM:PCP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exj (talk • contribs) 2015-07-09T15:16:33 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, source page states: "Copyright (c) 2012, Tour Inchean all right reserved." P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
COM:PCP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exj (talk • contribs) 2015-07-09T15:16:55 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, source page states: "Copyright (c) 2012, Tour Inchean all right reserved." P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Was originally nominated for speedy deletion as a blatant copyright violation (official image widely circulating on the web), but the speed deletion tag was removed by the uploader without comment, so here we are... DAJF (talk) 02:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Delete: I don't see any evidence of permission on the source page but there is a copyright symbol at the bottom of the page. The Chinese licnece is suspect and I don't think it is valid for this image. Besides which the image has a watermark, so COM:PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 13:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, source page states: "© LongRoad_易烊千玺个站." P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work/{{PD-self}}: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Authored with "Maíra Charken" and taken (as indicated) somewhere from "Blog Deznecessarios" = http://deznecessarios.blogspot.de/2008_07_01_archive.html, a copyrighted blog maintained by "Alessandra Tavares and Dezinha Nogueira", needing permission. Gunnex (talk) 06:41, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Author died 1955 Tekstman (talk) 08:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Flickr-washing. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Author died 1955 Tekstman (talk) 08:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Erreur : le bon fichier est : Category:Église Sainte-Avoye de Villebéon. François GOGLINS (talk) 09:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: User intended to create a category but did not use "Category:" as the prefix. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, multiple copyright issues. Uploaded in a row on 17.12.2014 for pt:John Vaz, a Brazilian actor, considering also:
- File:Materia de capa de o globo.jpg --> copyrighted scan of Brazilian newspaper pt:O Globo
- File:John vaz em jacques de molay.jpg --> taken from (example) https://www.facebook.com/196251270399444/photos/a.196251380399433.50188.196251270399444/196251383732766/?type=1&theater (2011)
- File:John vaz é d pedro I.jpg --> mysteriously watermarked with "MSivério Photography"
- File:Inconfidencia maçonica.jpg --> taken from (example) https://www.facebook.com/418097031602150/photos/pb.418097031602150.-2207520000.1436694800./614168301995021/?type=1&theater (04.2014)
- File:John vaz é che guevara.jpg + File:John vaz interpreta Che Guevara.jpg --> taken from (example) http://johnvaz.blogspot.de/2008/05/john-vaz-interpreta-che-guevara-em-la.html (2008)
Permission from "O Globo" (text & photos), "MSivério Photography" and other related, original photographers needed.
- File:Inconfidencia maçonica.jpg
- File:John vaz em jacques de molay.jpg
- File:John vaz é d pedro I.jpg
- File:Materia de capa de o globo.jpg
- File:John vaz é che guevara.jpg
- File:John vaz interpreta Che Guevara.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:55, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
from uploader: better files File:Leonardo Corona - The Crowning with Thorns - San Giovanni in Bragora, Venice.jpg; File:Corona, Leonardo L'incoronazione di spine 2.jpg Oursana (talk) 11:55, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 12:33, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 12:39, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 12:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:36, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 12:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete low resolution but professional image, almost certainly copyvio. MKFI (talk) 12:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Wrong Name Asurnipal (talk) 13:00, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: unneeded redirect. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:49, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Thomas Theodor Heine starb erst 1948 und ist sicher nicht mit dem Uploader identisch. Xocolatl (talk) 00:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, Scan from a newspaper, unknown/wrong date, no permission.Wdwd (talk) 16:21, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Sollte als neue Kategorie angelegt werden, das Anlegen als Galerie war ein Versehen. EI206 (talk) 16:18, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Broken file 17:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a retiré son image Gab722 (talk) 18:32, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:26, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:26, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:27, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:34, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:27, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:34, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:27, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
le propriétaire de l'image a demandé le retrait de l'image pour une question juridique. Gab722 (talk) 18:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
vervanging voor een betere afbeelding Edsel Selberie (talk) 23:51, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no proper reason given Denniss (talk) 16:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
bad picture, totally out of focus, ob absolutely now use for wikipedia Marcus Manilius (talk) 15:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Nonsense. This in other incarnations at de:WP blocked user is so wrong - this image is not good, that's true. But it is better than no image. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, no "nonsense" this image is not only "not good", it is extremely out of focus and totally useless for Wikipedia. --Marcus Manilius (talk) 17:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Und, Korrekturen, schon ein passendes Ersatzphoto geschossen? Nichts selber beitragen, aber auch hier durch Querschüsse auffallen. Mediatus (talk) 22:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
A very good and clear picture of the same object does exist in commons: [File:Sarcofago di generale rinuccini, coll. rinuccini, roma 200 dc ca. 02.JPG]. So, this is a normal case for deletion. --Marcus Manilius (talk) 08:18, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. There is no problem with the file. There is no limitation to one photo on Commons. Several different photos of an object can be uploaded so that users will have a choice. --Ochrid (talk) 13:42, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Not too blurry and in use. Commons is not Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Completly useless image, not in use in any Wikipedia article, completly blurry. Good picture: File:Sarcofago di generale rinuccini, coll. rinuccini, roma 200 dc ca. 02.JPG. So normal case for deletion. --Marcus Manilius (talk) 19:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Sock puppetry: Marcus Manilius is completely blocked at the German Wikipedia: [1] Mediatus (talk) 20:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
so what? blurry pictures are blurry pictures and it perfectly normal in common to delete them. There is a high quality image of the object available on commons. --Marcus Manilius (talk) 07:44, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept, No reason for deletion given.--Wdwd (talk) 18:05, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
bad picture, totally out of focus, of absolutely no use for Wikipedia Marcus Manilius (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Nonsense. This in other incarnations at de:WP blocked user is so wrong - this image is not good, that's true. But it is better than no image. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, this image is not only "not good", it is completely out of focus and totally useless for Wikipedia. --Marcus Manilius (talk) 17:21, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Und, Korrekturen, schon ein passendes Ersatzphoto geschossen? Nichts selber beitragen, aber auch hier durch Querschüsse auffallen. Mediatus (talk) 22:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- [[Keep}}Currently there is no other photo of this object on Commons. --Ochrid (talk) 13:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Und, Korrekturen, schon ein passendes Ersatzphoto geschossen? Nichts selber beitragen, aber auch hier durch Querschüsse auffallen. Mediatus (talk) 22:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Normal case for deletion: This is a bad and out of focus picture and there is currently a much better, in focus picture of this object in commons: File:Sarcofago caffarelli con ghirlande, da roma, 40 dc ca. 01.JPG --Marcus Manilius (talk) 19:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- By the way: there are plenty of good images of this piece in commons Category:Caffarelli sarcophagus --Marcus Manilius (talk) 19:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Sock puppetry: Marcus Manilius is completely blocked at the German Wikipedia: [2] Mediatus (talk) 20:44, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
so what? blurry pictures are blurry pictures and it perfectly normal in common to delete them. There is a high quality image of the object available on commons. --Marcus Manilius (talk) 07:43, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept, No reason for deletion given.--Wdwd (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Vol d'image http://www.quizz.biz/uploads/quizz/154993/orig/1.jpg?1288196250 JessydeVilly (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Looks more like {{PD-textlogo}} to me. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:28, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Below TOO. BrightRaven (talk) 15:02, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. Nesterov works in the public domain since 2017. Under Russian law, the copyright is protected for 70 years after the author's death. The period increases by 4 years for those who worked during the Great Patriotic War 1941-1945. Nesterov died in 1942; he worked in 1941-1942. See Russian Civil Code, Article 1281. See also similar request Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Portraits by Mikhail Nesterov
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 028.jpeg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 030.jpeg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 033.jpg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 034.jpg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 035.jpg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 036.jpg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 037.jpg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 040.jpg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 057.jpg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 061.jpg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 062.jpg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov, Wayfarers. Beyond the Volga, 1922.jpg
- File:1922 Nesterov An der Wolga anagoria.JPG
- File:1922 Nesterov two modes anagoria.JPG
- File:The Nightingale is Singing by M.Nesterov (1918, priv.coll).jpg
- File:The Nightingale is Singing by M.Nesterov (1929, Minsk museum).jpg
- File:Ганец. М. В. Несцераў.jpg
- File:За Волгай. (Вандроўнік). М. В. Несцераў.jpg
- File:Ля манастырскіх варот. М. В. Несцераў.jpg
- File:Пустынник и медведь.jpg
- File:Пустэльнік і мядзведзь. М. В. Несцераў.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._%D0%9C._%D0%92._%D0%9D%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%86%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%9E.jpg){kind=link}
Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:05, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
LEEP Russia may award a 74 year copyright to certain artists, but his work is in the public domain in the US and EU. Hiart (talk) 18:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- The jurisdiction of the United States or the EU do not matter. The requirement Commons rules of consist in the fact that a work has been free of copyright in the country of origin. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Keep. There is no evidence that the clause related to WWII is applicable to Nesterov because there is no evidence that he was working (employed) during this period. --Alexander (talk) 20:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Info Important factor. There is a legal precedent related to Alexander Belyaev's [3] copyrights. Writer died in 1942 (the same year as that of Mikhail Nesterov). The Supreme Arbitration Court of Russia during the trial between two publishing houses admitted that Belyaev copyrights have not expired and remain valid. His works not in the public domain. Later, judicially were confirmed copyrights writer Arkady Gaidar (died 1941), Yevgeny Petrov (died 1942), Yury Krymov (died 1941), Michael Kulchitsky (died in 1943). That is, there were many judicial decisions. I think that the courts examining case of Nesterov copyright take a similar decision. This is a reasonable assumption. Link to the news story (in Russian). This is Official site of Russian arbitration courts. “The decision of the Supreme Arbitration Court are final and binding in considering other similar cases. Thus, term of protection of works of the authors who were killed or died in the first years of the war has been extended to 2016-2017 years.” --Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:40, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Works will enter PD in 2017 due to a lengthened period of protection under Russian copyright law. Pitke (talk) 17:09, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment: Undeleted now. Sealle (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio. Nesterov works in the public domain since 2017. Under Russian law, the copyright is protected for 70 years after the author's death. The period increases by 4 years for those who worked during the Great Patriotic War 1941-1945. Nesterov died in 1942; he worked in 1941-1942. See Russian Civil Code, Article 1281. See also similar request Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Portraits by Mikhail Nesterov
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 016.jpeg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov 038.jpg
- File:Mikhail Nesterov Riders.jpg
- File:Nesterov M V Vsadniki.jpg
- File:U kresta Nesterov.jpg
Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- keep. The fact that the previous request was badly closed does not mean this one should be badly closed.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:09, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- The argument beside the point (of request). --Andrey Korzun (talk) 11:19, 12 July 2015 (UTC) You have not submitted a request for Commons:Undeletion requests. Files can not be restored. You can not say that the results are bad. You deliberately neglecting rules and procedures, it is unbecoming clowning administrator. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Would you please remind me why I should be interested in your opinion on whether I should be a Commons administrator.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Have you written a request for Commons:Undeletion requests? Thanks. Nothing else matters. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 14:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Would you please remind me why I should be interested in your opinion on whether I should be a Commons administrator.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- The argument beside the point (of request). --Andrey Korzun (talk) 11:19, 12 July 2015 (UTC) You have not submitted a request for Commons:Undeletion requests. Files can not be restored. You can not say that the results are bad. You deliberately neglecting rules and procedures, it is unbecoming clowning administrator. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- А где автор работал в 1941–1942 году?--Anatoliy (talk) 11:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- По Гражданскому кодексу, для защиты авторского права это не имеет значения. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:32, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- То есть вы хотите сказать, что мы в вами тоже работаем во время войны? Ведь где-то в Сирии или на Донбассе идёт война. По моему представлению, работать во время войны (для художника) — это сидеть где-то в подвале или окопе и рисовать картины, когда над тобой свистят пули, если же он жил и работал Москве, пока бомбили Минск или Киев, то это не работа во время войны ИМХО.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:39, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Я не понимаю о чем вы? Откройте Российский Гражданский кодекс и прочитайте статью 1281. Кодекс не оговаривает специальных мест и/или условий работы во время Великой отечественной войны. Для доказательства вашего ИМХО нужны подзаконные акты, толкования Верховного суда и т.п. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Так вы тоже не Верховный Суд, ваше трактование тоже не является единственно верным.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Моего трактования вообще нет. Имеется буквальное прочтение. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 14:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ну так я тоже буквально читаю, но интерпретируют все по-разному. Я интерпретирую, что он должен был находиться на территории боевых действий, вы же, что вообще он должен был жить и творить в период 1941–1945 годов все равно где.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- “5. Если автор работал во время Великой Отечественной войны или участвовал в ней, срок действия исключительного права, установленный настоящей статьей, увеличивается на четыре года.” --Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:18, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- И? Это не противоречит моей трактовке.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ну так докажите её. Бремя доказывания лежит на вас. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Так вы утверждаете, что он работал. Это не надо доказывать?--Anatoliy (talk) 17:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Считается, что последней картиной живописца была эта (1942 год). Кроме того, Михаил Нестеров до последних дней работал над воспоминаниями, которые вышли после его смерти. То есть он работал
в годыво время Великой Отечественной войны, факт. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)- Вот. Вы говорите «в годы войны». Но в законе говорится «во время войны».--Anatoliy (talk) 19:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- О да, спасибо, я исправил свою ошибку. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Он не работал, он находился на пенсии. Что он делал на пенсии, его личные проблемы, к закону не имеющие отношения.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- То есть по-вашему есть закон, по которому пенсионеры лишаются авторских прав? Я правильно вас понял? --Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:51, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- И да, в каком году Нестеров вышел на пенсию? может быть в 1942? откуда вообще у вас сведения о пенсии Нестерова? есть доказательства её существования? --Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:55, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Пенсионеры, разумеется не лишаются авторских прав. У Нестерова вполне были авторские права, которые истекли в прошлом году. Поправка про работающих во время войны к нему неприменина. Хотите применять- несите решение суда и вперёд.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- То есть пенсия здесь вообще не имеет значения, наконец-то вы признали факт. Это не поправка, это закон об авторском праве. То, что положения Гражданского кодекса России не распространяются на произведения Михаила Нестерова, должны доказывать вы. Согласно правилам Викисклада, файлы должны быть свободны от копирайта, в отношении сканов произведений Нестерова предложенных к удалению это очевидно не так. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Я вынужден констатировяать, что Вы не поняли вообще ничего из того, что я написал, а написал я совершенно обратное.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- То есть пенсия здесь вообще не имеет значения, наконец-то вы признали факт. Это не поправка, это закон об авторском праве. То, что положения Гражданского кодекса России не распространяются на произведения Михаила Нестерова, должны доказывать вы. Согласно правилам Викисклада, файлы должны быть свободны от копирайта, в отношении сканов произведений Нестерова предложенных к удалению это очевидно не так. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Пенсионеры, разумеется не лишаются авторских прав. У Нестерова вполне были авторские права, которые истекли в прошлом году. Поправка про работающих во время войны к нему неприменина. Хотите применять- несите решение суда и вперёд.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Вот. Вы говорите «в годы войны». Но в законе говорится «во время войны».--Anatoliy (talk) 19:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Считается, что последней картиной живописца была эта (1942 год). Кроме того, Михаил Нестеров до последних дней работал над воспоминаниями, которые вышли после его смерти. То есть он работал
- Так вы утверждаете, что он работал. Это не надо доказывать?--Anatoliy (talk) 17:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ну так докажите её. Бремя доказывания лежит на вас. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- И? Это не противоречит моей трактовке.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- “5. Если автор работал во время Великой Отечественной войны или участвовал в ней, срок действия исключительного права, установленный настоящей статьей, увеличивается на четыре года.” --Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:18, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ну так я тоже буквально читаю, но интерпретируют все по-разному. Я интерпретирую, что он должен был находиться на территории боевых действий, вы же, что вообще он должен был жить и творить в период 1941–1945 годов все равно где.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Моего трактования вообще нет. Имеется буквальное прочтение. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 14:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Так вы тоже не Верховный Суд, ваше трактование тоже не является единственно верным.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Я не понимаю о чем вы? Откройте Российский Гражданский кодекс и прочитайте статью 1281. Кодекс не оговаривает специальных мест и/или условий работы во время Великой отечественной войны. Для доказательства вашего ИМХО нужны подзаконные акты, толкования Верховного суда и т.п. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:56, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- То есть вы хотите сказать, что мы в вами тоже работаем во время войны? Ведь где-то в Сирии или на Донбассе идёт война. По моему представлению, работать во время войны (для художника) — это сидеть где-то в подвале или окопе и рисовать картины, когда над тобой свистят пули, если же он жил и работал Москве, пока бомбили Минск или Киев, то это не работа во время войны ИМХО.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:39, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- По Гражданскому кодексу, для защиты авторского права это не имеет значения. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:32, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Keep. There is no evidence that the clause related to WWII is applicable to Nesterov because there is no evidence that he was working (employed) during this period. --Alexander (talk) 20:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- That's undeniable proof. This painting of the artist, he was working in 1942. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- This is not a reliable source.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- This is not an argument. Search requests give many other resources with identical data. This famous painting, no matter what site to watch it. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- This is not a reliable source.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Working means employment in this context. Employment during the war period is proved by records in the special 'employment record' (трудовая книжка) or equivalent documents. This is a standard procedure, which is known to everyone whose parents or grandparents applied for special benefits extended to "persons who had worked during the WWII period". Those without such records failed to receive the benefits. --Alexander (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- It is interesting idle speculation, but may not be proof. If all that was said in court decisions, clarifications of the Supreme Arbitration Court and other competent judicial authorities, I would agree. But you do not have the authority interpreted the laws of the Russian except as it is written in the law. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- You do not have this authority either, even though you behave like if you do.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- It is interesting idle speculation, but may not be proof. If all that was said in court decisions, clarifications of the Supreme Arbitration Court and other competent judicial authorities, I would agree. But you do not have the authority interpreted the laws of the Russian except as it is written in the law. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Working means employment in this context. Employment during the war period is proved by records in the special 'employment record' (трудовая книжка) or equivalent documents. This is a standard procedure, which is known to everyone whose parents or grandparents applied for special benefits extended to "persons who had worked during the WWII period". Those without such records failed to receive the benefits. --Alexander (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- For example, house cleaning or bringing water from the well does not mean "working during WWII". Therefore, only proved facts of employment count. --Alexander (talk) 21:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- No. This chapter of the Civil Code is devoted to the law on copyright, and it covers the works of art, science, etc. It does not cover any work at all. It covers only some of the rights on products of intellectual activities. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- "It covers the works of art, science, etc. It does not cover any work at all." This is mutually contradicting and simply does not make sense. --Alexander (talk) 05:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- See Civil Code Article 1255 — What is copyright. See Article 1259 — What is the object of copyright. "Employment count" in the context of the copyright indeed, does not make sense. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- This comment (and the previous one too) is more or less a random mixture of verbs and nouns. I am afraid that any further discussion is not possible, given the very poor command of English demonstrated by the nominator. --Alexander (talk) 07:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- I think intelligent users will understand me. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:22, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- This comment (and the previous one too) is more or less a random mixture of verbs and nouns. I am afraid that any further discussion is not possible, given the very poor command of English demonstrated by the nominator. --Alexander (talk) 07:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- See Civil Code Article 1255 — What is copyright. See Article 1259 — What is the object of copyright. "Employment count" in the context of the copyright indeed, does not make sense. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:40, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- "It covers the works of art, science, etc. It does not cover any work at all." This is mutually contradicting and simply does not make sense. --Alexander (talk) 05:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Generally, your statement is absurd. Chapter 70 of the Russian Civil Code is devoted to copyright. Nothing else. It establishes a legal relationship in the field of intellectual property. Consequently, Article 1281 of the law on the term of copyright should be understood in its own context. If the article says that the period be extended for 4 years, when the author was worked during the war, it means, that the author of the work, and he worked on his own works of literature, of science, of art. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Well, during the war, but not in time of war as you say earlier, but he did not work during the war.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:43, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, my interpreter translated quote from the law as a “during the war”. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC) In the Russian language there is a small difference, but do it in English? --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Now I live in Kiev, and there is war in Donetsk. I live in time of war, but not during the war, if I will live in Donetsk, I will live during the war. Here is similar case: painter lived in Moscow, but there was no war in Moscow.--Anatoliy (talk) 23:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, my interpreter translated quote from the law as a “during the war”. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:52, 12 July 2015 (UTC) In the Russian language there is a small difference, but do it in English? --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Well, during the war, but not in time of war as you say earlier, but he did not work during the war.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:43, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- No. This chapter of the Civil Code is devoted to the law on copyright, and it covers the works of art, science, etc. It does not cover any work at all. It covers only some of the rights on products of intellectual activities. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- For example, house cleaning or bringing water from the well does not mean "working during WWII". Therefore, only proved facts of employment count. --Alexander (talk) 21:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Info Important factor. There is a legal precedent related to Alexander Belyaev's [4] copyrights. Writer died in 1942 (the same year as that of Mikhail Nesterov). The Supreme Arbitration Court of Russia during the trial between two publishing houses admitted that Belyaev copyrights have not expired and remain valid. His works not in the public domain. Later, judicially were confirmed copyrights writer Arkady Gaidar (died 1941), Yevgeny Petrov (died 1942), Yury Krymov (died 1941), Michael Kulchitsky (died in 1943). That is, there were many judicial decisions. I think that the courts examining case of Nesterov copyright take a similar decision. This is a reasonable assumption. Link to the news story (in Russian). This is Official site of Russian arbitration courts. “The decision of the Supreme Arbitration Court are final and binding in considering other similar cases. Thus, term of protection of works of the authors who were killed or died in the first years of the war has been extended to 2016-2017 years.” --Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:35, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, this is the only serious argument after all this bullshit you tried to sell us as an absolute truth. Note that there were TWO court decisions: The lower level court decided that the texts are PD, and then the Supreme Arbitration Court decided they are not in PD. Thus, the case is very far from trivial.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- However, this does not prove that Nesterov was working for employment during WWII. --Alexander (talk) 08:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- His situation was similar to Belyayev, who was on the occupied territory, and the article says the layers presented his manuscripts as a proof, and the proof was accepted by the court.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- "В доказательство были представлены публикации Александра Беляева в газете «Большевистское слово», датированные 26 июня 1941 года, а также архивные справки, подтверждающие, что автор работал до последних дней своей жизни" = a newspaper publication from June 26, 1941 and archive documents were presented. --Alexander (talk) 09:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- You are right, I did not read it too carefully.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- "В доказательство были представлены публикации Александра Беляева в газете «Большевистское слово», датированные 26 июня 1941 года, а также архивные справки, подтверждающие, что автор работал до последних дней своей жизни" = a newspaper publication from June 26, 1941 and archive documents were presented. --Alexander (talk) 09:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- "working for employment" — it is your invention. Russian Civil Code in the part of the Copyright Act does not contain this term. The fact that Nesterov worked in 1941-1942, has been proven. But I will repeat for very persevering. (1) In the summer of 1942 the artist worked on the painting [5] and completed it. Now it is in the collection of the State Tretyakov Gallery. Reputable art historians write that he was working on new works until his death. (2) In the summer of 1942, the Nesterov 80th anniversary has been released a book of memoirs. Of course, he was working under contract with the publishing house. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:13, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- What you write is your own interpretation of the law, which may be or may be not accepted by the court. Concerning the fact that he was working under contract with a publishing house, it would be great to see the scan of the contract. Otherwise, your statement is baseless.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm writing a reasonable assumption that you can not refute. In the Alexander Belyaev's case were taken into account manuscript writer. To prove that he had worked during the war 1941-1942. If a writer's manuscript court took as proof that the painter will be accepted paintings. This is a reasonable assumption. I am confident that contract with the state publishing house will be brought to justice. Or will be proved its existence. Publication of the book without a contract in the Soviet bureaucratic system was impossible. Nesterov's biographies wrote that he was preparing the book for publication in the 1941-1942. Other words Nesterov performed editorial work commissioned by the publisher. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I am afraid you completely misunderstand the situation. I am not going to refute your assumptions. It is sufficient that everybody knows that this is not a law, these are your assumptions about the law, which you think are reasonable and nobody else does. The administrator who closed the previous request failed to understand this.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm writing a reasonable assumption that you can not refute. In the Alexander Belyaev's case were taken into account manuscript writer. To prove that he had worked during the war 1941-1942. If a writer's manuscript court took as proof that the painter will be accepted paintings. This is a reasonable assumption. I am confident that contract with the state publishing house will be brought to justice. Or will be proved its existence. Publication of the book without a contract in the Soviet bureaucratic system was impossible. Nesterov's biographies wrote that he was preparing the book for publication in the 1941-1942. Other words Nesterov performed editorial work commissioned by the publisher. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- What you write is your own interpretation of the law, which may be or may be not accepted by the court. Concerning the fact that he was working under contract with a publishing house, it would be great to see the scan of the contract. Otherwise, your statement is baseless.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- By the way, I want to note that in September 1942, Nesterov became a member of the Union of Soviet Writers [6]. It was a creative union, analogue of the trade union for writers. As I recall, membership in the creative union for artists equated to employment. Also, do not forget that the the end of life he was an academician of the All-Russian Academy of Arts (in 1947 it was reformed in the Academy of Arts of the USSR). Membership in the Academy is equated to employment. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:49, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- And finally. October 16, 1941, in the newspaper "The Soviet Art" was published an article by Nesterov. Also in the Soviet literary magazine "October" №3-1942 published Nesterov's article about the painter Yaroshenko. You can make sure in the Nesterov's biography (in Russian). This is an exact analogy with the Alexander Belyaev's case. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:17, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- His situation was similar to Belyayev, who was on the occupied territory, and the article says the layers presented his manuscripts as a proof, and the proof was accepted by the court.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:01, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Let's discuss it until 2017, then keep. --Amga (talk) 11:16, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per legal precedent, these works will enter PD in 2017 due to a lengthened period of protection under Russian copyright law. Pitke (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mikhail Nesterov
[edit]Copyvio. Nesterov works in the public domain since 2017. Under Russian law, the copyright is protected for 70 years after the author's death. The period increases by 4 years for those who worked during the Great Patriotic War 1941-1945. Nesterov died in 1942; he worked in 1941-1942. See Russian Civil Code, Article 1281. See also similar request Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Portraits by Mikhail Nesterov
Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:20, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Keep. There is no evidence that the clause related to WWII is applicable to Nesterov because there is no evidence that he was working (employed) during this period. --Alexander (talk) 20:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per legal precedent, these works will enter PD in 2017 due to a lengthened period of protection under Russian copyright law. Pitke (talk) 17:17, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Valerian Turetsky
[edit]Copyvio. Turetsky works in the public domain since 2017. Under Russian law, the copyright is protected for 70 years after the author's death. The period increases by 4 years for those who worked during the Great Patriotic War 1941-1945, or participated in the War. Valerian Turetsky killed in the war in 1942. See Russian Civil Code, Article 1281.
- File:Valerian Turetsky autoportrait.jpg
- File:Valerian Turetsky house.jpg
- File:Valerian Turetsky mother.jpg
- File:Valerian Turetsky pond.jpg
- File:Valerian Turetsky Volga.jpg
Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per legal precedent, these works will enter PD in 2017 due to a lengthened period of protection under Russian copyright law. Pitke (talk) 17:22, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Restored, now PD - Jcb (talk) 01:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Konstantin Pankov
[edit]Copyvio. Pankov works in the public domain since 2017. Under Russian law, the copyright is protected for 70 years after the author's death. The period increases by 4 years for those who worked during the Great Patriotic War 1941-1945, or participated in the War. Konstantin Pankov killed in the war in 1942. See Russian Civil Code, Article 1281.
Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:40, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per legal precedent, these works will enter PD in 2017 due to a lengthened period of protection under Russian copyright law. Pitke (talk) 17:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Restored, now PD - Jcb (talk) 01:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
San Francisco Pride Parade
[edit]- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19140408769).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19138965228).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330506321).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19138963648).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19138966338).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330506871).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330507231).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19140411099).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320512482).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19326558725).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330510851).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320513292).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19140413989).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320520082).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (18705652173).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330516461).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19300487456).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (18705947093).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330518871).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320520382).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19140557109).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19300503386).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330654201).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320524452).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19300624576).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19139122628).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (18705989933).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330665311).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320659042).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330654831).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19139114258).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19326706135).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19140564299).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330560051).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19140564739).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (18706091083).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320662452).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320562402).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19300532536).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330666451).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (18705780513).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19140264579).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19300640576).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19140464819).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (18704194184).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19300639926).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19139125718).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (18704192404).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19330671081).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19300636916).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19300641456).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19139101840).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19140578169).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19300643346).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19140580179).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19326728395).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320677842).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (18706110243).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19326730835).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19139135748).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320682352).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320684932).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320686242).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (18704213094).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320687802).jpg
- File:SF Pride Parade 2015 (19320683982).jpg
- File:San Francisco Pride Parade 2015 (18633165623).jpg
- File:San Francisco Pride Parade 2015 (19067581149).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
All these images were uploaded by User:Another Believer, who has uploaded 100s of passed Flickr image, but these all appear in the category and upon reviewing them, all the images are found on Flickr with a CC non-commercial restriction licence, even though the metadata shows an attribution licence. Because the images have never been passed by the FlickreviewR bot and we cannot see the source urls, we cannot confirm the free licence was ever valid and must delete based on the precautionary principle and licence shown on the images currently at Flickr. An OTRS permission from the copyright holder would keep the images.
I previously tagged a few of these images and they have all been deleted besides which the user has acknowledged the issue on their talk page. Ww2censor (talk) 10:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Flickrreview failed due to deletion of files on Flickr. Suitable licensing cannot be confirmed. Pitke (talk) 17:26, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Aristarkh Lentulov
[edit]Copyvio. Lentulov works (post-1917) in the public domain since 2018. Under Russian law, the copyright is protected for 70 years after the author's death. The period increases by 4 years for those who worked during the Great Patriotic War 1941-1945. Lentulov died in 1943; he worked in 1941-1943. See Russian Civil Code, Article 1281. See also similar request Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Portraits by Mikhail Nesterov
.jpg){kind=link}
Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Keep. There is no evidence that the clause related to WWII is applicable to Lentulov because there is no evidence that he was working (employed) during this period. --Alexander (talk) 20:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- In this biography it states that the artist worked until his last days. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Working means employment in this context. Employment during the war period is proved by records in the special 'employment record' (трудовая книжка) or equivalent documents. This is a standard procedure, which is known to everyone whose parents or grandparents applied for special benefits extended to "persons who had worked during the WWII period". Those without such records failed to receive the benefits. --Alexander (talk) 21:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- It is interesting idle speculation, but may not be proof. If all that was said in court decisions, clarifications of the Supreme Arbitration Court and other competent judicial authorities, I would agree. But you do not have the authority interpreted the laws of the Russian except as it is written in the law. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:24, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- For example, house cleaning or bringing water from the well does not mean "working during WWII". Therefore, only proved facts of employment count. --Alexander (talk) 21:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- No. This chapter of the Civil Code is devoted to the law on copyright, and it covers the works of art, science, etc. It does not cover any work at all. It covers only some of the rights on products of intellectual activities. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- "It covers the works of art, science, etc. It does not cover any work at all." This is mutually contradicting and simply does not make sense. --Alexander (talk) 05:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- See Civil Code Article 1255 — What is copyright. See Article 1259 — What is the object of copyright. "Employment count" in the context of the copyright indeed, does not make sense. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:52, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- "It covers the works of art, science, etc. It does not cover any work at all." This is mutually contradicting and simply does not make sense. --Alexander (talk) 05:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Generally, your statement is absurd. Chapter 70 of the Russian Civil Code is devoted to copyright. Nothing else. It establishes a legal relationship in the field of intellectual property. Consequently, Article 1281 of the law on the term of copyright should be understood in its own context. If the article says that the period be extended for 4 years, when the author was worked during the war, it means, that the author of the work, and he worked on his own works of literature, of science, of art. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- No. This chapter of the Civil Code is devoted to the law on copyright, and it covers the works of art, science, etc. It does not cover any work at all. It covers only some of the rights on products of intellectual activities. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- For example, house cleaning or bringing water from the well does not mean "working during WWII". Therefore, only proved facts of employment count. --Alexander (talk) 21:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- It is interesting idle speculation, but may not be proof. If all that was said in court decisions, clarifications of the Supreme Arbitration Court and other competent judicial authorities, I would agree. But you do not have the authority interpreted the laws of the Russian except as it is written in the law. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:24, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Working means employment in this context. Employment during the war period is proved by records in the special 'employment record' (трудовая книжка) or equivalent documents. This is a standard procedure, which is known to everyone whose parents or grandparents applied for special benefits extended to "persons who had worked during the WWII period". Those without such records failed to receive the benefits. --Alexander (talk) 21:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per legal precedent, these works will enter PD in 2018 due to a lengthened period of protection under Russian copyright law. Pitke (talk) 17:32, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. Shillingovsky works (post-1917) in the public domain since 2017. Under Russian law, the copyright is protected for 70 years after the author's death. The period increases by 4 years for those who worked during the Great Patriotic War 1941-1945. Shillingovsky died in 1942; No proof of that the artist has not worked during the period of 1941-1942. See Russian Civil Code, Article 1281. See also similar request Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Portraits by Mikhail Nesterov
- File:Shilingovsky Litovsky Castle and Market 1921.jpg
- File:Shilingovsky Litovsky Castle North Tower 1921.jpg
- File:Shillingovsky 1.1922..jpg
- File:Шилінговський П. Екслібрис А.Каріньян 1928.jpg
- File:Шилінговський П. Екслібрис П.Е.Корнилова, 1928.jpg
- File:Шилінговський П. Петербург. Літовський замок після пожежі.jpg
- File:Шиллинговский П. Руины и возрождение. Зимний дворец и Адмиралтейство, 1923.jpg
- File:Шиллинговский П.А. Руины и возрождение. Ростральные колонны, 1923.jpg
Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- А где хранятся указанные картины?--Anatoliy (talk) 20:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Безотносительно от места хранения, они есть объект авторского права. Это не картины, а в основном гравюры. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Не важно, хоть фотография. Применяется авторское право той страны, где хранится объект, от которого создана производная работа. А есть страны, в которых авторское право более либерально, и там эти гравюрі будут свободны.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Разумно предположить, исходя из биографии автора, что оригиналы произведений находятся в Петербурге. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Не важно, хоть фотография. Применяется авторское право той страны, где хранится объект, от которого создана производная работа. А есть страны, в которых авторское право более либерально, и там эти гравюрі будут свободны.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:01, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Безотносительно от места хранения, они есть объект авторского права. Это не картины, а в основном гравюры. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Keep. There is no evidence that the clause related to WWII is applicable to Shillingovsky because there is no evidence that he was working (employed) during this period. The lack of this evidence is exactly the proof that the painter did not have an official job (position) in 1941-42. --Alexander (talk) 20:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Regrettably, you know the history very badly and also the subject of dispute. Shillingovsky died as a professor of the Academy of Arts of the USSR. From hunger. During the siege of Leningrad. And buried in the common grave. Shame on you? Show a little respect for the victims of the siege of Leningrad. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Was it an argument? No, just another example of rude and uncivil behavior. --Alexander (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- As I understand it, you have realized your remark as rude and uncivil behavior. Thank you. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Was it an argument? No, just another example of rude and uncivil behavior. --Alexander (talk) 20:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
To make it clear, the above conversation resulted in an outward personal attack. The nominator failed to support his point and elaborated on my knowledge of history and on my attitude toward the victims of the war instead. This is totally irrelevant and unacceptable, --Alexander (talk) 05:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ie essentially the request you have nothing to object to. Your argument was refuted, and you chose to write a meaningless complaint. OK. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:48, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- I can't understand the meaning of this comment, it is again a random combination of words. --Alexander (talk) 08:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- It is written not only for you. Other users will understand. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- In essence request, you have no objection, I understand you correctly? --Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- What is an "essence request"? I have not requested any essence. I prefer natural ingredients. --Alexander (talk) 08:31, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- I can't understand the meaning of this comment, it is again a random combination of words. --Alexander (talk) 08:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I was searching on different sources (such as here and here) to get some information about the participation of Shillingovsky in any armed conflict, but I could not find anything referred to that, therefore I can't state what never happened. I also hope I don't receive personal attacks for giving my opinion here. Fma12 (talk) 20:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- To prolong copyright, according to the law should be one of two factors: 1) the author participated in the Great Patriotic War, or 2) the author worked during the Great Patriotic War. In the Shillingovsky case is applied factor 2. He has taught at the Academy of Arts, and he was working on new art works. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per legal precedent, these works will enter PD in 2017 due to a lengthened period of protection under Russian copyright law. Pitke (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment: Undeleted now. Sealle (talk) 01:15, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jijoca de Jericoacoara regarding official symbols
[edit]Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Jijoca de Jericoacoara emancipated in 1991 (see also http://www.jijocadejericoacoara.ce.gov.br/), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government.
Gunnex (talk) 08:24, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
This is a file from Flickr. http://www.flickr.com/photos/52996534@N00/97665845 ( (CC BY 2.0) ) The real source and its real licence seems to be unknown 37.5.3.229 07:03, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep please: This is a well know picture of the death of Pablo Escobar. The picture is in the Internet before publishing in Flickr. The sources are also well know, and are present in many websites, but I agree that that needs verification. Therefore, the file should be kept because also is widely used in the Wikimedia projects. --Amitie 10g (talk) 07:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: I have no idea why the original source has been removed, but I got the photo from there originally: http://www.djibnet.com/photo/pablo/the-death-of-pablo-escobar-97665845.html As the caption says, it is "a photograph taken by DEA agent Steve Murphy" therefore the current license info is correct. Laurent (talk) 18:21, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 09:08, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is no safe origin source. Wheremis a final and acceptable evidence that this photograph is really the work of a Drug Enforcement Administration employee? This must be given so that it can be in the public domain 88.65.131.171 09:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
A reliable source information is required not any internet website which is of very doubtful quality.
- Is that a better proof for u? Steve Murphy needed to take some pics for his boss.--Sanandros (talk) 17:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- This image is copied on hundreds of website, and most of them are unattributed. A few websites do credit Steve Murphy/DEA, but they're either unreliable or just seem to rehash/mirror Commons (i.e. they all use the exact same phrase: "a photograph taken by DEA agent Steve Murphy"). That said, I couldn't find any evidence to the contrary. Surely, a photo as ubiquitous as this would be claimed by someone if Steve Murphy/DEA wasn't the photographer. So Keep. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Now with the philly.com source mentioned above by Sanandros, I think there's no reason to doubt that the photo is not from Steve Murphy from the DEA. Laurent (talk) 11:10, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept as before. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tulsi Bhagat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Privacy concerns. Author's request. Please speedy delete below listed files. Thank you! Kind regards,
- File:Volunteer of Maithili Wikimedians User Group Tulsi Bhagat celebrating Wikidata's 4th Birthday.jpeg
- File:Tulsi Bhagat celebrating Wikidata's 4th Birthday in the context of Maithili Wikimedians User Group (2).jpeg
- File:Tulsi Bhagat celebrating Wikidata's 4th Birthday in the context of Maithili Wikimedians User Group.jpeg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:35, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 09:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Official symbols, not own work.
- File:Somalinationalanthem.ogg
- File:National Intelligence and Security Agency.png
- File:Somali National Army Logo.png
- File:The Somali National Army Logo.png
- File:Somali Police Force Logo.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Invalid reasoning. Fry1989 eh? 19:03, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nominations, user did not create these official symbols and provided no link to whomsoever did. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
The character, Satsumaru, is the mascot of Satsuma Town and its rights belong to the mayor of Satsuma. According to the town, the character "should be used in the shape or colours decided by mayor" (さつま町長が定めた形，色等の規格に沿って正しく使用すること). This means the character cannot be altered, i.e. not freely usable. Yasu (talk) 15:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why it is in scope. Jonund (talk) 16:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
![16:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/07/12#c-Jonund-2015-07-12T16:06:00.000Z-File:"Não_sou_conduzido,_conduzo".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
![17:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2015/07/12#c-Ellin_Beltz-2015-08-07T17:50:00.000Z-File:"Não_sou_conduzido,_conduzo".jpg){kind=link}
No evidence for a permission from the original photographer/source. Scanning an existing photo does not create own copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- The photo was scanend from Rappel, a magazine published by the association of the Luxembourgish Resistance Movements against the invasion of the country by Nazi Germany. The photo was most probably taken during Hartmann's emprisonment in Luxembourg (1946 - 1957), most probably in 1946 by a public servant. Please also note that 1946 - 2015 comes very close to the 70 years, after which the copyright expires. For historical reasons, it would be a pity not to have this photo to illustrate the article about Fritz Hartmann, a war criminal who was responsible, among others, for the execution of a number of political prisoners from Luxembourg. --Cayambe (talk) 18:19, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Cayambe, does :lb have an exemption policy (such as fair-use on :en)? --Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, Túrelio. I think I'll use the fair-use license on :lb. Thanks for the hint. --Cayambe (talk) 19:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Cayambe, does :lb have an exemption policy (such as fair-use on :en)? --Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- The "dead line" is 70 years after the death of the photographer, not after it was taken. If the Luxembourg administration gave the licences "PD" it might be ok, but we have no information about this. Of course it would be "a pity", but it would also be one, if Commons would get law problems. --Nicola (talk) 18:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, I understand. Please delete the image. Thanks for your efforts. --Cayambe (talk) 19:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Could you eventually try to find out who is the photographer? --Túrelio (talk) 19:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Mmh, this seems rather impossible to me, as the photo was probably taken by a civil officer of the prison early after Hartmann's emprisonment in 1946. Please, see also my remark above. --Cayambe (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Could you eventually try to find out who is the photographer? --Túrelio (talk) 19:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in Spain for interior of buildings. Elisardojm (talk) 22:29, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- This photo must be deleted because in Spain Freedom of Panorama only applies to outside of buildings and that photo is about the interior of a building without permission. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 19:19, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Also picture credited but no source, and as nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Pan ist keine akzeptable Abkürzung für Panier und ist somit ein Fehldruck. Archaeoninja (talk) 18:30, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: File currently in use. Why not try to correct or upload a fixed ver5sion instead of deleting? --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Vermutlich wurde da nur ein Teil beim Einscannen oder Bearbeiten (?) aus Versehen abgeschnitten...--Hsingh (talk) 20:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The abreviation can be edited so that the file is correct. Kathisma (talk) 17:58, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 20:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Instruction poster for urine-diverting dry toilet (UDDT) in low-income area Bulbul near Nairobi, Kenya (10543355195).jpg
[edit]_in_low-income_area_Bulbul_near_Nairobi,_Kenya_(10543355195).jpg){kind=link}
_in_low-income_area_Bulbul_near_Nairobi,_Kenya_(10543355195).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
likely copyvio Themightyquill (talk) 15:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Info I'd say it was unlikely to be a copyvio. In line with the precedent of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Squatting UDDT (Tamil language) (4270556805).jpg, the charities that produce these educational materials (See http://www.WSTFKenya.org) have no interest in making money out of them, and their goal is to disseminate the information on safe sanitation as widely as possible. I'll try sending an email to SuSanA about this one and see if a clarification can be sorted out before deletion. --Fæ (talk) 15:26, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
_(4270556805).jpg){kind=link}
- What Fæ has said is absolutely correct (thanks, Fae). I am the one who assisted in making this image available (together with thousands of others from the SuSanA flickr photo database). I will send an e-mail to my contact at WSTF to double confirm this. EvM-Susana (talk) 19:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Email confirming permission now sent to OTRS, ticket:2015080610009205. --Fæ (talk) 09:45, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS is fine Natuur12 (talk) 20:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Files under Category:Lupin III 2015-07-12
[edit]- File:Lupin III Part II Season 4 title card.png
- File:LupinIII-Chanai-map.JPG
- File:LupinIII-traincar-sign.JPG
- File:LupinIII-traincar.JPG
- File:Moyai001.JPG
- File:浜中駅駅名標.JPG
Lupin III and its characters are copyright protected (not old enough). See also the previous DR. Yasu (talk) 15:35, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- I uploaded File:浜中駅駅名標.JPG.
- Uploading these photos may not be problematic (but not sure) except File:Lupin III Part II Season 4 title card.png, because these are illustrations officially served in public spaces (File:Moyai001.JPG: Nii-jima village sightseeing office, others: Hokkaido Railway Company).
- Similar case: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Godzilla hibiya japan 2006 9.jpg
- --Sinryow (talk) 13:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC) --Sinryow (talk) 11:52, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Sinryow: The photos are subject to freedom of panorama in Japan, which doesn't allow free use of artistic materials even if they are installed in public places. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- I would like to add that, the discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Godzilla hibiya japan 2006 9.jpg points out that the guideline in freedom of panorama in Japan may not be a correct interpretation of Japanese laws (comment by "Jnn 12:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)" - in Japanese).
- I will not hesitate to delete the photo I uploaded at once, but I would like to make clear the legal problem. --Sinryow (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
- Article 46 of the Japanese Copyright Act states that it is OK to exploit an artistic work permanently installed in an outdoor location, but except for the purpose of selling copies of it, or selling such copies. Commons doesn't accept any files licensed under non-commercial use only, so these Lupin III files are not permitted anyway. Yasu (talk) 15:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Sinryow: The photos are subject to freedom of panorama in Japan, which doesn't allow free use of artistic materials even if they are installed in public places. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for additional explanations. I understand the problem is the conflict with the rule of Wikimedia Commons. --Sinryow (talk) 03:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: but kept one that is imho below TOO. Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Contains unfree third party content (like pictures from Hollywood stars) 92.213.15.188 17:11, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I've uploaded just about every issue. Most issues are 16 or more pages. The base has two outdoor movie theatres. Most issues do include a movie review, where a third of a single page is consumed by an image from Hollywood, that is almost certainly not licensed.
Several years ago someone nominated an earlier issue for deletion, for the same reason as unnamed User:92.213.15.188. Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Wire Issue08v7.pdf The conclusion was that any Hollywood images included on local movie reviews should be considered "de minimus", and that discussion was closed as keep. I believe this discussion should be closed as keep as well. Geo Swan (talk) 20:06, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- This is a complete misunderstanding of de minimis. On these 11 pages are at least 7 images copyrighted. They are of normal quality and can easily be identified. One image is about one third of a page, the other 6 are another third of a page altogether. --92.213.15.188 01:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, Page 4 contains a movie review, the two images on that page take up approximately one third of the page. Page 14 contains the answers from four GIs to the question of the week -- who should play Charlie's Angels, if the film is re-made, and it includes 6 thumbnails. For what it is worth, the last page of the issue is page 20, not page 11. So, all those thumbnails take up less than four percent of the issue. Could you please make an effort to explain why you assert incidental images that take up less than four percent of the file shouldn't be recognized as "de minimus"? Geo Swan (talk) 09:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
page
urlx y description [7] 189 210 Promotional headshot of Scarlett Johansen, at 189 x 210 pixels hardly "normal quality" [8] 190 212 Promotional headshot of Rosario Dawson, at 190 x 212 pixels hardly "normal quality" [9] 210 212 Promotional headshot of Eva Mendes, at 189 x 210 pixels hardly "normal quality" [10] 190 210 Promotional headshot of Kirstie Alley, at 189 x 210 pixels hardly "normal quality" [11] 186 191 Promotional headshot of Darlene Cates, at 186 x 191 pixels hardly "normal quality" [12] 210 209 Promotional headshot of Melissa McCarthy, at 189 x 210 pixels hardly "normal quality" [13] 259 206 Another movie poster, at 259 x 206 pixels hardly "normal quality". [14] 749 346 A movie poster, the largest image, yet, at 749 x 346 pixels, I suggest it is a stretch to call it "normal quality".
Kept: Dm argument sounds fair. If you disagree please nominate both files. We should either delete both or keep both Natuur12 (talk) 20:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately without more information including source, date and author, it's not possible to know if this image is correctly licensed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
