Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/05/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 3rd, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NO ME INTERESA 181.209.246.223 11:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not delete user talk pages without a very good reason. If you are no longer care, then there is nothing forcing you to look at this page. Green Giant (talk) 11:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by a copyvio guy. most likely this is copyvio Saqib (talk) 12:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. All other uploads by this user were deleted as copyvios. Green Giant (talk) 12:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lopolotes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted image, see http://www.parnassusbooks.net/event/author-event-james-dashner-author-maze-runner All content © 2011 by Parnassus Books unless otherwise noted. (nothing noted)

Ies (talk) 05:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 18:41, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Basvb; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 22:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Template:No tag message whitetemplate/ja

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non encyclopedic, no relevant description, perhaps this is a personal photo collage. There is artistic value however Hansmuller (talk) 22:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy-deleted as obvious attack-image and derivative. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:18, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-encyclopedic, description? perhaps this is a personal photo collage. There is artistic value however Compare https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_Color, possible vandalism there Hansmuller (talk) 22:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy-deleted as copyviolating derivative of not-own image and as it was uploaded to vandalize :es[1]. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wurde versehentlich im Rahmen der Erstellung des Artikels 61 Virginis erstellt CarstenE (talk) 14:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy -- housekkeping. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:45, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No publication date or author is given; the anonymous UK tag is invalid, as no evidence is given of the research done to establish the painter's identity; no valid US tag is provided Hchc2009 (talk) 06:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Nonsense request: http://www.bridgemanimages.com/en-GB/asset/311032/english-school-20th-century/the-queen-pleads-for-the-men-of-calais-1914-colour-litho 37.5.2.252 08:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The UK web page you've given gives no details as to whether it was ever originally published, claims copyright over the image itself under UK law and notes that "The copyright status of this image is either dependent on the territories into which you are publishing or is undetermined due to limited information on the creator. Please contact us if you have any questions." As it stands, the Commons image file has no valid US or UK tag on it. Indeed, an anonymous, unpublished image is protected for 120 years after the date of creation in the US, so would be under copyright in the US until 2034. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An interesting question for Bridgneman may be: "Why do you try to sell free artwork (free in the country of its origin and in the US) although you cannot name its author?" 37.5.2.252 08:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The underlying image is not necessarily free in the UK (there is conditionality involved in a UK anonymity claim), and under UK law Bridgeman's reproduction of it may well introduce a new, additional copyright; and the original may well not be free in the US either, thus their warning tag on the webpage. Hchc2009 (talk) 09:09, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The author seems to be unknown (english school) at multiple sources where normally attribution to a known author would be likely Basvb (talk) 15:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As an anonymous work with no evidence of publication with the permission of the creator, it is copyright in the US until 120 years after creation (1914) making the work still in copyright in the US until 2034 Hchc2009 (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image has been kept earlier today, however this argument has not fully been explored previously. Another thing: Could you refrain from deleting valid licenses from images which have just been kept per that license simply because you disagree? As you can see in my reasoning in keeping the file basic research has been done and the author being unknown is not by a lack of looking into it. Basvb (talk) 23:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Basvb, this was actually exactly the argument I put above originally on 26 April (!), which you examined yesterday: have a look at the text above ("no valid US tag is provided... an anonymous, unpublished image is protected for 120 years after the date of creation in the US, so would be under copyright in the US until 2034.") To state the obvious, images on the Commons require both a US and UK tag - at the moment the image doesn't have a valid US tag; if the image is anonymous and there is no evidence of it being originally published with the creator's consent, then it is still under copyright in the US.
In terms of the UK tag, take another look at the tag. You'll see that there's a key phrase in it, which says " If you wish to rely on it, please specify in the image description the research you have carried out to find who the author was." This is an important part of UK copyright law, as someone (e.g. an editor here) using a claim of anonymity in the UK must demonstrate that "the author cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry" - for example by conducting research, asking the original source of the image where they acquired it, etc., and showing what steps they took to get to that conclusion (e.g. what were the "multiple sources" checked? Did you email any companies currently offering the image for sale? etc.). This is different (I believe) from the situation in the Netherlands and much of Europe, which doesn't require this to be done..
The British Academy gives some useful advice here in pleasantly plain English (!) (see here, section 8). They note that "the potential user should be able to demonstrate that serious efforts have been made in good faith to locate and contact the rights owner, including all reasonably available avenues of inquiry, before any use of the work not already permitted by law... may be made." There's a useful list of examples in that section to illustrate what this might mean.
You've restored the tag, but still haven't provided this information, which is essential for the claim. That's important legally. I've no problem in principle with you adding a UK-anonymous tag to this file, but if you do so, you do need to follow the Commons rules and specify what research you undertook in the image description. Hchc2009 (talk) 03:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potencial copy violation - logo of Polish football team Klapi (talk) 20:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 21:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete - as all the football teams logos, who belongs to those clubs and are not published by their owners in any free-licences. Wulfstan (talk) 22:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, logo from homesite of the football team: http://legia.com/ which seems to be copyright protected. --ThePolish 09:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. --ThePolish 18:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless photomontage. Doctore (talk) 18:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CopyVio Logo (http://www.tf1.fr/nos-chers-voisins/) Kootshisme (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Refrijet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry deleted twice per spam on upload date.

Gunnex (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, not clear it was ever used. Possibly out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author whose pages were not notable enough for Wikipedia's article-space (see the project scope; w:User:Writerpaul; w:User:PaulLevasFiction) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WkDiegoLombardi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:WkDiegoLombardi. Like this Google Street View copyvio File:Terreno de Mariluz.jpg most likely taken from Google Maps & Co.

Gunnex (talk) 19:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamil Masood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images. not useful for education purpose.

Saqib (talk) 20:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammadbilal9808 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images. not useful for educational purpose

Saqib (talk) 20:36, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Going to re-upload as a PNG, as the svg files are not formatting correctly when saved Psulliv8 (talk) 20:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 20:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost certainly not own work. Possible violation of copyright - Matthias v.d. Elbe is named as author, but in fact this seems to be a derivative work. The original image most likely is this one. Copyright needs to be clarified. Blutgretchen (talk) 21:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:47, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Most likely (see also mouse pointer) derivated from a copyrighted satellite image. Gunnex (talk) 22:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License has restrictions "NC-ND" which are not allowed on commons McZusatz (talk) 22:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kadel3003 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement Till (talk) 15:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JMUrtubey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:JMUrtubey. Most likely grabbed from social media.

Gunnex (talk) 16:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like Flickr washing. The Flickr account was only created this month. A version of this image can be found at http://www.sundaytimes.lk/141109/columns/mahinda-tests-his-achilles-heel-126410.html dating back to November 2014. Obi2canibe (talk) 17:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Reason:Flickrwash , Uploaded By a sockpuppet of Dinura Pradeep Balasooriya--MediaJet talk 10:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 00:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ravi.stha077 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, text only George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, news banner George Chernilevsky talk 06:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, promo banner George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable screenshot George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private logo George Chernilevsky talk 06:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private logo George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be a copy of Bangladesh government's Local Government Engineering Department map at http://www.lged.gov.bd/UploadedDocument/Map/RAJSHAHI/bogra/dhupchancia/dhupchancia.jpg Worldbruce (talk) 06:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused promo banner George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, watermarked promo George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, watermarked promo George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private edited photo George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, a game screenshot George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, a game screenshot George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 14:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable chat screenshot George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo, watermarked George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This one is similar. --217.21.43.64 17:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope promo banner George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gufran tahir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, or COM:DW of the sign. Josve05a (talk) 07:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, appears to be a screenshot taken from a broadcast. Related DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:C Castrogiovanni.PNG Commons:Deletion requests/File:Foot worship.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Slav feet mistress.png Elfix 08:36, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:55, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, appears to be a screenshot taken from a broadcast. Related DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:C Castrogiovanni.PNG Commons:Deletion requests/File:Foot worship.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Slav feet mistress.png Elfix 08:36, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Screenshot, no permission. Yann (talk) 16:33, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused screenshot test Pierpao.lo (listening) 08:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused & obsolete Kopiersperre (talk) 09:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost certainly not own work. Possible violation of copyright - Matthias v.d. Elbe is named as author, but in fact this seems to be a derivative work. The original image seems to be this one. Copyright needs to be clarified. Blutgretchen (talk) 09:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused low quality formula Kopiersperre (talk) 09:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused & obsolete Kopiersperre (talk) 09:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 11:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement Till (talk) 12:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 12:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SongsNepal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:04, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it was for a category test. Vatadoshu (talk) 14:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it was for a category test. Vatadoshu (talk) 14:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it was for a category test. Vatadoshu (talk) 14:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it was for a category test. Vatadoshu (talk) 14:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it was for a category test. Vatadoshu (talk) 14:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdanDeris (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, the original image may be copyrighted Rodrigolopes (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image, no potential use. Fry1989 eh? 16:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image, no potential use. Fry1989 eh? 16:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely a video screenshot. Gunnex (talk) 11:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samra ashiq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not useful for education purpose.

Saqib (talk) 12:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. {{PD-Brazil-media}}-fail (not an audiovisual and photographic work) regarding the official logo of pt:Associação Desportiva Vasco da Gama, a Brazilian football team, founded in 1952. Unlikely also that this symbol was digitized in there present form in 1952 (most likely a recent creation). Complex logo, failing also PD-whatever. Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 12:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Association football logo of pt:Sociedade Desportiva Juazeirense, a Brazilian team.


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, superseded by File:Levothyroxine 200.svg and others Kopiersperre (talk) 13:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality, replaced by File:Levothyroxine 200.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 13:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-quality image, several different images showing the same content available Master Uegly (talk) 14:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:42, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WAX247 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, very bad quality

Didym (talk) 16:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:42, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daffyduck1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, uploader globally blocked

Didym (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploader Ferdycm (talk · contributions · Statistics) already "suffered" Commons:Deletion requests/File:Candela Márquez.jpg in 10.2013 (most likely grabbed from Facebook). Here, the file (uploaded in 05.2014), is - per exif - a copryrighted work by "Copyright: Carlos P. de Ussia" and is available (showing some faces from the shooting) also on photographer's Flickr via (cropped) https://www.flickr.com/photos/27641623@N02/7449874036/ (2012, all rights reserved by " carlos pellicer de ussia"). Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 16:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright tag seems wrong, the file is rather non-free, probably with fair use: This is the logo and not the coat of arms ("Wappen"). The university's charter ("Grundordnung") [2] explicitly states that the coat of arms ("Wappen") is the old seal showing the founders Friedrich and Alexander, which is depicted in [3]. Mgmax (talk) 17:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The correct coat of arms [4] should also be imported and tagged. Please excuse if this deletion request is the wrong place for this discussion, I'm not used to working on Wikimedia Commons. Mgmax (talk) 17:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per COM:TOO. --Leyo 17:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 15:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Veraltetes Logo, nicht im Sinne der Markendarstellung 2003:C5:8F1F:C1C4:84B5:48B:8599:38AA 15:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a reason for deletion, we keep historic logos. --Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hijigne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 22:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free billboard art. RJaguar3 (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete as we can't have nice things on Wikipedia. --Ebyabe (talk) 22:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted logo, and out of scope anyway Ymblanter (talk) 08:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 16:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kohdarmiansali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HasnainAD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

i see no education value in these photos.

Saqib (talk) 12:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:19, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Itsomsai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available of this logo. Fry1989 eh? 16:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 16:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available of this logo. Fry1989 eh? 16:21, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 16:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wshau (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 16:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristians17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Cristians17 / logs (= 4 uploads on 18.01.2015 = 2x copyvio)

Gunnex (talk) 08:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: m Steinsplitter (talk) 16:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Megamarcas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Megamarcas (Facebook+Flickr+etc. grabber) / logs. All files uploaded in a row on 14.09.2014 and are related to es:Arauca (Arauca), a city in Colombia.

Gunnex (talk) 12:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subarashi34 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Subarashi34 (Panoramio / Blog grabber). Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided. All files (a mix of Facebook and historical photos, including obvious photos of photos) related to es:Salto de Agua Chiapas, a city in Mexico.

Per eswiki user "Hola soy una joven (...)" = most likely not biologically able to have pulled the trigger for (example) this 1967th or 1945th photo, neither was the responsible creator for the official coat of arms of the related municipality (File:ESCUDO SALTO DE AGUA CHIAPAS.png, btw, official site http://www.saltodeagua.gob.mx/ is down, so far as I could see not archived).

Most likely an "all she can get grabber" to "illustrate" her home city without caring copyrights, including (despite the copyvios) false claim of authorship/license etc. of a Panoramio file (luckily) in CC.

Gunnex (talk) 14:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:51, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, uploader's only contributions are on their own user page Didym (talk) 16:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:59, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 06:45, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:31, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely derivated from a satellite image, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Qaubp14adl / logs (= 4 uploads in 03.2014 = 3x copyvio) Gunnex (talk) 13:46, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Saqib as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: uploaded by a copyvio guy. most likely this is copyvio Saqib (talk) 13:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 16relivi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 16relivi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, several copyvios deleted, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 20:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:50, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Argentina. This sculpture was carved as part of the National Flag Memorial, which was opened in 1957. FredWalsh (talk) 16:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no FoP in Argentina for monuments Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo, self-promotion George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, self promotion Ezarateesteban 22:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, non-notable logo band promotion George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ezarateesteban 22:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AUTO CREATED: This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. D-Kuru (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ADD COMMENT: The university has a page on en.wikipedia since 2004 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temuco_Catholic_University) and has a page on other wikipedias as well. On the german wikipedia it has LogoUCT.jpg and This logo and was uploaded in 2014-09. The logo could be considered {{PD-ineligible}} after all. If it's still a copyvio in your eyes the logo should be transfered to the wiki sites that have fair use...
--D-Kuru (talk) 16:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 20:57, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, legacy reaction scheme Kopiersperre (talk) 09:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Replacement: file:Methanol formylation.png. DMacks (talk) 16:52, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 12:44, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I actually requested this vectorization last year but forgot it was made because it took a while (see Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop/Archive/2014#Request for vectorization of File:Imevisión.jpg. I've replaced it with a better copy done by myself at File:Imevisión.svg. I suppose this is basically a very old CSD G7 request. Raymie (talk) 07:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright holder C-Photo-K/Christina Kelkel from metadata
Converted by me to DR, as the original upload-log from :en suggests that C.patricia=Christina Kelkel. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The original uploader was "2012-08-25 21:47 683×1024× (121625 bytes) C.patricia Christina Kelkel
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
GNU head Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.

", However notice the description "Jody Cundy's racing leg for the London 2012 Paralympics". Which means the photo is as above, but the description shows that the photographer did not create the 3D object in the photo. The leg is decorated and has logos on it, and the whole thing is a glorious photograph but I'm not sure the photographer can release the copyright on the 3D object. I am sorry I was not more clear in the statement. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Reijosebe / logs Gunnex (talk) 08:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, appears to be a screenshot taken from a broadcast. Related DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:C Castrogiovanni.PNG Commons:Deletion requests/File:Foot worship.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Slav feet mistress.png Elfix 08:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Symbols of Balneário Pinhal regarding official symbols

[edit]

Coat of arms (brasão) of Brazilian municipality pt:Balneário Pinhal emancipated in 1995 (see also http://balneariopinhal.rs.gov.br/cidade/historia), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Generally: Unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982) Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government.

Gunnex (talk) 09:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeuwre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:48, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at the use of the pics at de.wiktionary.org/wiki/Dreikäsehoch and de.wiktionary.org/wiki/balancieren: quite useful if you want to show what's meant by the German words balancieren and Dreikäsehoch. --Jeuwre (talk) 10:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source and from the look of it, it apears as it has been cut from an on-line catalogue. Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 10:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo, low resolution, the uploader's only contribution. Very likely to be copyright violation. 213.87.136.215 10:02, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" is very unlikely. 217.251.100.249 10:36, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a duplicate of File:Orvieto_subterranea_2009_20.JPG Paperoastro (talk) 11:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res. pic, not taken by the uploader (see his disk, where he admits that only the high res pics he uploaded were taken by him). Paulae (talk) 11:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res. pic, not taken by the uploader (see his disk, where he admits that only the high res pics he uploaded were taken by him). Paulae (talk) 11:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph has been taken at an exhibition at Qatar and is a derived work of the depicted artwork by Takashi Murakami. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Qatar. Hence we would need a permission by the artist through OTRS to keep this photograph. AFBorchert (talk) 14:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Aneghe

[edit]

A follow-up of Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Aneghe. As before, files do not appear to be the uploader's own work. --Scolaire (talk) 14:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality low resolution see File:Antonio del Pollaiuolo - David Victorious - WGA18029.jpg Oursana (talk) 15:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 1 image File:Plaza de la Justicia en Costa Rica (6).JPG (deleted in 04.2014) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Since 07.2014 collage configured with a questionmark. Uploader notified in 09.04.2015. Gunnex (talk) 18:25, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the collage with a new image I found elsewhere on the commons.--Porsche997SBS (talk) 08:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader may have scanned this, but that doesn't make it his own work, and the presumably nonfree logo and image means it's not free of copyright as simple text The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    • You're absolutely wrong, Chris, and you know it. While works of the US government are generally free of copyright, this is a work of a political subdivision of the State of California. Works of California government are not exempt from copyright -- see sites like

http://www.ca.gov/About/Government/State/LawsAndRegs.html

http://home.lausd.net/

http://www.ucla.edu/terms-of-use/

which demonstrate that the state of California, local governments in California, and government agencies in California all claim copyrights to their work. Under US copyright law, recent works are not required to carry copyright notices, so the fact that there is no notice on the front of the ticket is irrelevant. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Obviously you've found a few exceptions in a State government that represents the 8th largest economy in the world, so I'm not terribly surprised. You still haven't not provided evidence that this image is protected. Furthermore, I've been told by city officials that it is not protected. But when I inquired about getting proof of that, I was told that while they are fine with the images being available, they do not see a reason to encourage distribution. Typical for a government rep... Oh, by the way, its not recent. The ticket clearly says 2005. --Scalhotrod (talk) 15:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's not the way Commons works, Chris, and you're experienced enough to know that. You uploaded the image with the inaccurate claim that you were the copyright holder. When that fell through, you made a claim about the governing law that was disproved. You can't just upload content here and demand that other editors do your work for you. Either prove that the rightsholder released the copyright, or the image will be deleted. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 10:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, no, which rights and how to apply them is something that I don't understand very well on Commons. It sounds like the rights needs to be changed, so I'm happy to consult someone here who understands this and can help make the change. But just like in mainspace on the Eng Wikipedia, your opinion or ignorance of a subject does not give you the right to delete something because you don't like it. Its really sad that you choose to attack me in this way and it just reinforces what I've said at ANI. --Scalhotrod (talk) 14:49, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-CAGov}} should be a match Natuur12 (talk) 17:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain logo Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:51, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In scope? Just a collage of random butterfly's Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:47, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject hardly visible, uncertain ID Natuur12 (talk) 18:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Hard to ID is no reason for deletion :) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncertain ID and impossible position Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Hard to ID is no reason for deletion :) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]