Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/08/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Non-free web screenshot. Nigel 08:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
NigelSoft: Sorry, but that is not correct: it's a part of GNU licensed package and its well defined under https://www.jigoshop.com/press/
- Sorry, I found the same image by Google, but I didn't open that web page, so I didn't find the licence. --Nigel 11:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- it's partially my mistake. I should have provided a link when I have uploaded the image --User_talk:PaulPres
Speedy close: Free screenshot properly licensed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
author request Pratyya (Hello!) 13:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: {{Speedy}} case — Revicomplaint? 13:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Missing permission from the architect of the airport. Stefan4 (talk) 14:44, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 15:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Chinese logo. Unlikely the work of an Icelandic Flickr user. Stefan4 (talk) 15:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 15:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lauganeskirkja
[edit]Non-free architectural work by is:Guðjón Samúelsson.
Stefan4 (talk) 15:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Undeleted in 2021 Guðjón Samúelsson copyright has expired. Platonides (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this photograph seems to be a derivative work of something by w:Gerður Helgadóttir. See e.g. flickrphoto:5692633187 which credits it to her. Stefan4 (talk) 16:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 18:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Is this packaging? Stefan4 (talk) 18:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As part of cleanup russavia (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
See [1]. Nigel 08:36, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Textlogo and in scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
I think that it is unlikely that an Icelandic Flickr user managed to take a picture of Barack Obama. Presumably, it comes from somewhere else. Stefan4 (talk) 17:42, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: deleting as per COM:PRP and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 19:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Probe der Einstellungen Q!ee!21 (talk) 18:36, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: User request, test upload. Leyo 21:44, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-free architectural work by w:Guðjón Samúelsson. Stefan4 (talk) 19:43, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 20:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Contemporary work by Zurab Tsereteli, no FoP for statues in Russia. A.Savin 20:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-free statue by w:Alexander Stirling Calder. Stefan4 (talk) 20:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nom russavia (talk) 20:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-free statue by w:Alexander Stirling Calder. Also out of scope because of the Christmas tree. Stefan4 (talk) 20:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as per the FOP argument and as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
quiero que se elimine y esta cuenta Vallicopampa (talk) 02:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Closed: User page deleted courtesy of Hedwig in Washington (talk · contribs), but the accounts cannot be removed, specially global accounts. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
This file is wrong. Tszyantong (talk) 15:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Comment: What is wrong?
- If the file does not that you expected, just upload a new version of them.
- If the filename is incorrect, use the Move file feature.
- If you really want to delete the file, please use {{Speedy}} instead.
- --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Author request deletion of page. Geagea (talk) 05:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded a better version of this. Tszyantong (talk) 15:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
I uploaded a better version of this. 84.208.226.169 18:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
It is unlikely that an Icelandic guy holds the copyright to a Chinese logo. Stefan4 (talk) 18:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Russavia. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:12, 25 August 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Files uploaded by Eddier msr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal, out of project scope images
Lewis Hulbert (talk) 00:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Bulgarian National Bank require written permission for reproduction of Bulgarian banknotes and coins of all emissions in physical or electronic form. · Favalli ⟡ 00:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by লক্ষ্মীছাড়া শৌভন (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a personal photo gallery.
~ Nahid Talk 01:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The painting is by American artist Walter Range (born 1949). I can not find the copyright status of this image but it is certainly not "own work" by uploader. Takeaway (talk) 02:42, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Seems to have been taken from www.kfcartography.com, which makes use of copyrighted Google maps. Takeaway (talk) 03:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 03:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement. Nigel 08:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete Trademark of major Taiwanese pizza chain Napoli, 100+outlets and 2nd largest Pizza chain in Taiwan, no more out of scope than the logo of any other major high street chain. Does not appear to be used in a promotional way. However is too complex to qualify as a simple geometric logo. Website of company to which this belongs, states all rights reserved, no indication that the uploader has permission from the company to upload this on their behalf, delete as copyvio.--KTo288 (talk) 07:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Improper license. Uploader uses license saying it is his own work, but states he got the pic "from a friend" and has no idea of the date. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
unused, upload by a one-time-wonder, no educational use Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
it was added by mistake Paulinewalley (talk) 04:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Private album picture, some unknown persons, see description Motopark (talk) 05:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Private album picture, some unknown persons, see description Motopark (talk) 05:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Private album picture, some unknown persons, see description Motopark (talk) 05:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
This file uploaded from Armenica.org. We have OTRS permission that says: This permission only applies to images existing on http://armenica.org/ as of 1 January 2007. Any later images do not fall under this permission!. I personlly checked the most of the maps that uploded and add a blue tag that confirm that the file uploaded to armenica.org before 1.1.2007 after I checked it in archive.org. however this file uploaded to armenica.org in 2012 her. Geagea (talk) 05:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
some homepage material, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 06:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
some homepage material, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 06:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
some homepage material, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 06:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
some homepage material, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 06:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
some homepage material, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 06:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
no permission 37.5.6.35 06:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.6.35 06:44, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elizavetaglotova (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images are out of scope.
- File:Информация Семейный Альбом.jpg
- File:Удостоверение ветерана.jpg
- File:Наградной лист михаила ильича.jpg
- File:Удостоверение и краткая характеристика.jpg
- File:Документ на медаль.jpg
- File:Документ благодарность.jpg
They are derivative works of unpublished photographs by unknown authors from a family archive.
- File:Глотов Михаил.jpg
- File:Михаил Ильич на службе.jpg
- File:Полковник Глотов.jpg
- File:Мундир Глотов Михаил.jpg
- File:Глотов Михаил Ильич.jpg
- File:Михаил Ильич Глотов.jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The {{PD-UN}} template has been deprecated and the UNHCR website has a clear copyright statement so there is no reason to assume that this is a free logo. LGA talkedits 07:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploader added a CC license later. But considering a google search it looks doubtfull that this is own work of the uploader. Should be confirmed through Commons:OTRS. JuTa 07:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
不要なアップロードです Tsiyk (talk) 07:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete 著作権侵害です。--Stefan4 (talk) 18:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
the 1950-s are less then 70 years ago. JuTa 07:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 08:07, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio. http://www.cell.com/trends/molecular-medicine/abstract/S1471-4914(09)00155-5 ChongDae (talk) 08:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement. Nigel 08:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement. Nigel 08:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:42, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
test upload. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:44, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal file. There is only user contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:49, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Non-free web screenshot. Nigel 08:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Holdinghighco (talk · contribs)
[edit]missing some OTRS tickets and some useful descriptions
- File:Marilyn.jpeg
- File:Petits Prix.jpg
- File:HighCo 2011.jpg
- File:HighCo' solutions.jpg
- File:Tagged Mona Lisa.jpg
- File:L'offre de HighCo.jpg
- File:Happy Face.jpg
37.5.6.35 09:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" with a watermark 37.5.6.35 09:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" TinEye has found 12 copies 37.5.6.35 09:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
probably a screenshot from TV 37.5.6.35 09:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
unused personal file 37.5.6.35 09:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The alleged author is on the left of the picture. Strong doubt. Pleclown (talk) 11:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of five passports. One of them is {{PD-USGov}}, but what about the other ones? Stefan4 (talk) 11:47, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
contains at least one copyright violation (Hoflin file) 37.5.6.35 11:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
I have uploaded a better version. Chandiosahab (talk) 11:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Deletion nomination instead of {{No source}} to get wider input. I have no idea what this is. Ok, unless I'm mistaken, it's a drawing of some Hindu goddess. But is it modern or from some old manuscript? I notice that it exists on many other sites, for instance [2] or [3] used at [4]. So, if modern, copyvio and no evidence of free license. If old, needs a source, possibly an author, and an appropriate PD tag. Lupo 12:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IslandMan89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The life + 50 years license was used for the uploads, but the author is unknown for all the files.
- File:Rafael Leonidas Trujillo (2).jpg
- File:El Jefe trujillo was a fan of tiny mustaches uniforms and hungarian gunsmiths.jpg
- File:Independencia-trinitarios-rd.jpg
- File:Bernardo Vega.jpg
- File:Alfredo Fernández Simó.jpg
- File:Pedro-Henríquez-Ureña.jpg
- File:Rafael-trujillo-killers.jpg
- File:Luis Manuel Caceres.jpg
- File:Roberto Pastoriza.jpeg
- File:Miguel Angel Baez.JPG
- File:Luis Amiama Tio.png
- File:Huascar Tejeda.jpeg
- File:Amado Garcia Guerrero.jpeg
- File:Rafael Trujillo and Rafael Estrella.jpeg
- File:Antonio Imbert Barrera.gif
- File:Antonio de la Maza.jpg
- File:Juan-Francisco-García.jpg
- File:Tulio Manuel.jpeg
- File:Ercilia-Pepin-3.jpg
- File:Antonio Guzman.jpg
- File:Casimiro Nemesio de Moya.jpg
- File:Dr-miguel-canela.jpg
- File:Rafael-Trujillo2.jpg
- File:Donald-Reid-Cabral.jpg
- File:Guillo Pérez.jpeg
- File:Juan Isidro.jpeg
- File:Franklin Franco.jpg
- File:Francisco Caamaño Deño.2.JPG
- File:Sebastian Lemba.jpg
- File:MAXIMOGOMEZ.JPG
- File:Emilio Prud Homme.jpg
- File:Salome Urena.jpg
Underlying lk (talk) 12:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IslandMan89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works: low resolution, incomplete metadata, most of which can be found on google maps and reddit.
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 4.webp ➝ google maps
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 5.webp ➝ google maps
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 6.webp ➝ google maps
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 1.webp ➝ google maps
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 3.webp
- File:Miches, El Seibo, Dominican Republic 2.webp ➝ google maps
- File:Polo, Barahona, Dominican Republic.jpg
- File:Polo, Barahona, Dominican Republic 2.jpg ➝ reddit
0x0a (talk) 05:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IslandMan89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: Small reoslution, no EXIF data, user with bad history.
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella neighborhood 2.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella 3.jpg
- File:IMG San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella neighborhood.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella beach 6.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella beach 3.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella beach 4.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella Christmas.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella beach 2.jpg
- File:San Pedro, Dominican Republic, Juan Dolio Marbella beach.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown streets 4.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 44.webp
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 88.webp
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 3.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 9.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 8.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city 6.webp
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic downtown city.webp
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic town 2.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic city 2.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic city town.jpg
- File:Barahona Dominican Republic city.jpg
0x0a (talk) 05:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 16:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 12:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
wrong name AMY (talk) 12:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Artist cited at source page is Neville William Cayley (1886–1950): not dead for 70 years yet, so PD-Art license is not valid until 2020. MPF (talk) 13:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 13:42, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
No useful information. Looks like advertising. Non-linked Richard Avery (talk) 14:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
screeshot of non-notable information. Non-linked Richard Avery (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Suspicious License Mohamed Amine Abdoune (talk) 14:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Unremarkable image that does not show its decription and has no other information Non-linked Richard Avery (talk) 14:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rauglothgor (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama for sculptures in USA.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rauglothgor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from plaque images and text which is long enough to be copyrighted. Not necessary to illustrate subjects.
- File:Kewaunee County Lime Kilns Marker.jpg
- File:The Old Mill Historical Marker.jpg
- File:Early History of Kewaunee Historical Marker.jpg
- File:Kewaunee Car Ferry Service Plaque.jpg
- File:Chicago and North Western Depot - Packers Heritage Trail Plaque.jpg
- File:Freimann Hotel Plaque.jpg
- File:Packers Heritage Trail plaque - St. Willebrord Catholic Church.jpg
- File:Packers Heritage Trail plaque - Packers Office Building.jpg
- File:Packers Heritage Trail plaque - Birthplace of the Packers.jpg
- File:Packers Heritage Trail plaque - Bellin Building.jpg
- File:Packers Heritage Trail plaque - Milwaukee Road Depot.jpg
- File:Packers Heritage Trail Plaque - Brown County Courthouse.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashishraiso (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Unclear origins of image used for poster.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE? Unused image of non-notable persons Эlcobbola talk 14:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document with images of unclear origins. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Hamid shokat2.jpg
- File:Ataolah.jpg
- File:Network2.jpg
- File:Allah2.png
- File:Oic sg banner2.png
- File:CINVU1.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of organization of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:Shokathamid130.jpg
- File:Mr. Iyad Ameen Madani 130.png
- File:السید إیاد أمین مدنی.jpg
- File:Iyad bin Amin Madani 121.jpg
- File:Hamid shokat121.jpg
- File:Ataolah121.jpg
- File:Network 121.jpg
lNeverCry 23:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of a church by Hörður Bjarnason and Ragnar Emilsson.[5] Stefan4 (talk) 15:01, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. User:Stefan4 do we have any possible undeletion date? russavia (talk) 15:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- If I understand this correctly, Ragnar Emilsson died "yesterday" (that is, the day before 28 September 1990). This page indicates that Hörður Bjarnason died only a few weeks earlier ("Hörður lést 2. september 1990."), but it's very difficult to read Icelandic text. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 15:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately, you can't upload pictures of Icelandic buildings unless the architect has been dead for at least 70 years, and is:Guðjón Samúelsson died in 1950. See COM:FOP#Iceland. Stefan4 (talk) 15:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Restored, then deleted again as duplicate of File:Laugarneskirkja í Laugarnessprestakalli - panoramio.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Perlan 1
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Iceland. The architect is Ingimundur Sveinsson.
- File:Cloudy Day at Perlan (14124304611).jpg
- File:Colors of the night (2109986096).jpg
- File:Fly safely with Icelandair (2934932355).jpg - deleted as photoshopped/out of scope
- File:Glory (2309999092).jpg
- File:Happy New Year (3146745073).jpg - deleted as out of scope
- File:Perlan (13940977808).jpg
- File:Perlan (5303110245) (2).jpg
- File:Perlan (8617349789).jpg
- File:Perlan from Kopavogur.JPG
- File:Perlan, Reykjavik (2168973686).jpg
- File:Perlan, Reykjavík.jpg
- File:Perlan.jpg
- File:Reykjavík-Perlan.jpg
- File:The top floor (2109907903).jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. russavia (talk) 18:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Perlan 2
[edit]The building's dome is a 1991 addition by architect Ingimundur Sveinsson. There is no Commons-acceptable FOP in Iceland.
- File:20190623 Perlan 1727 (48470026542).jpg
- File:20190623 Perlan 8854 (48469856486).jpg
- File:20190623 Perlan 8878 (48469981797).jpg
- File:20190623 Perlan 8879 (48469832726).jpg
- File:20190623 Perlan 8894 (48469821091).jpg
- File:20190623 Perlan 8895 (48469967392).jpg
- File:20190623 Perlan 8896 (48469818516).jpg
- File:20190623 Perlan 8901 (48469962547).jpg
- File:20190623 Perlan 8902 (48469813871).jpg
- File:Colors of the night (2109986096).jpg
- File:Glory (2181693782).jpg
- File:Gone with the wind (2671397805).jpg
- File:High Flight (2016518377).jpg
- File:Just around the corner (8000707060).jpg
- File:Miðborg, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland - panoramio (18).jpg
- File:Perlan - panoramio.jpg
- File:Perlan Dome Reykjavik.jpg
- File:Perlan im Herbst - panoramio.jpg
- File:Perlan Reykjavik (25179288160).jpg
- File:Perlan Reykjavik 3 (24844335584).jpg
- File:Perlan, the Water Tanks - 2013.08 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Reykjavik Perlan-entrance.JPG
- File:Sadness (2851158107).jpg
- File:Sky Fever (2016995466).jpg
- File:The Pearl (13960210505).jpg
- File:Up & down (2180822681).jpg
- File:Við Perluna (496545484).jpg
- File:Við Perluna II (496545490).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 16:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- No. You can see here the license.
Josse.Cottenier 
Overleg 06:35, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Insofar as this license means to include the release of the Twitter bird it should be ignored as being unlawful, seeing as Lokas Software is not the copyrightholder and does not have the authority to release the image of the Twitter bird under a Creative Commons-license. The use of these type of icons on websites, indiciating "we have a Twitter account!", should be viewed in the light of trademark law and is subject to this policy. Woodcutterty (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- If you look close enough, you see around the twitter bird a little greyish line, that way, Lokas made this icon special ;) Joostlek (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Insofar as this license means to include the release of the Twitter bird it should be ignored as being unlawful, seeing as Lokas Software is not the copyrightholder and does not have the authority to release the image of the Twitter bird under a Creative Commons-license. The use of these type of icons on websites, indiciating "we have a Twitter account!", should be viewed in the light of trademark law and is subject to this policy. Woodcutterty (talk) 15:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(5759124795).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
하는_작용에_대한_기전.png){kind=link}
_et_Christian_Pierret.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![107 File:Projekt plakatu do filmu "Seksmisja" Juliusza Machulskiego. Akryl, tektura. Oryginał. Kolekcja prywatna - Warszawa..jpg](#File:Projekt_plakatu_do_filmu_"Seksmisja"_Juliusza_Machulskiego._Akryl,_tektura._Oryginał._Kolekcja_prywatna_-_Warszawa..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![164 File:Кульмамет и Болгарская в пьесе "Коварство и любовь".jpg](#File:Кульмамет_и_Болгарская_в_пьесе_"Коварство_и_любовь".jpg){kind=link}
![166 File:Хамит Кульмамет в пьесе "Зулейха".jpg](#File:Хамит_Кульмамет_в_пьесе_"Зулейха".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(5759124795).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5759124795).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(5759124795).jpg){kind=link}
_(5759124795).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
%ED%95%98%EB%8A%94_%EC%9E%91%EC%9A%A9%EC%97%90_%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C_%EA%B8%B0%EC%A0%84.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%ED%95%98%EB%8A%94_%EC%9E%91%EC%9A%A9%EC%97%90_%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C_%EA%B8%B0%EC%A0%84.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_et_Christian_Pierret.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_et_Christian_Pierret.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_et_Christian_Pierret.jpg){kind=link}
_et_Christian_Pierret.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](http://blog.hadisukirno.co.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Sukasalya.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Google+ logo is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 16:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well not in this way and for my userpage it needs to be like this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joostlek (talk • contribs)
- Did you read the reason of the DR? There is already a SVG version of the G+ logo. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Not in this way, https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/83193/google_plus_icon#size=48
- Did you read the reason of the DR? There is already a SVG version of the G+ logo. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Facebook logo is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 16:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well not in this way and for my userpage it needs to be like this Joostlek (talk) 06:38, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Probably not the uploader's own work. Is this simple enough to be in the Public Domain? El Grafo (talk) 16:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Únlikely to be own work. We need evidence of the PD-status. Natuur12 (talk) 16:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The painting certainly is not the uploader's work. Probably old enough to be in the public domain, but we need to know who the painter was and when he died. El Grafo (talk) 16:49, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
On Flickr, this is tagged with "fossvogskirkjugarður" (= graveyard at is:Fossvogskirkja, I think). Icelandic Wikipedia tells that the church is from 1948, so I would assume that the statue can't be older than that. No idea of who the sculptor is. Stefan4 (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
According to is:Fossvogskirkja, this is a 1948 church by Sigurður Guðmundsson. Unfortunately, we can't keep images of buildings by Icelandic architects who haven't been dead for at least 70 years. Stefan4 (talk) 17:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be Own work, also available here. Permission via OTRS required. FDMS 4 17:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Street prostitution
[edit]File asserts without proof that the subjects of the photo are prostitutes, which is socially stigmatized (and perhaps illegal?). The subjects of the photo are easily identifiable in one of the photos; pixelizing their faces in the other is not sufficient to make them unidentifiable, to those in their own community. Commons is not a project that should expose private individuals to social stigmatization or other risks; these files should both be deleted.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Pete F (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Keep Je ne comprends pas pourquoi on met en doute la bonne foi de l'auteur de cette photo. Par ailleurs, elle a été prise au 60 mm, à quelques centimètres des sujets. De toute évidence, ces personnes sont consentantes puisqu'elles sourient au photographe. De plus, si elles n'avaient pas voulu être photographiées, elles auraient sans aucun doute protesté et fait en sorte que la photo soit effacée de la carte mémoire. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 11:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)- delete There is no proof of consent of the depicted persons to the publication of their image additionally to the reasons Pete noted. The uploader of this picture violates peoples rights on their image on a regular basis und could never proof any consent oh the depicted persons in recent cases. And at least one of the depicted persons may very likely be a minor. Weissbier (talk) 12:23, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 00:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hallgrímskirkja
[edit]This is a building in Iceland by w:Guðjón Samúelsson. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case.
- File:Iceland - Reykjavik 022 - Hallgrimskirkja cathedral (6571012295).jpg
- File:Iceland - Reykjavik 023 - Hallgrimskirkja cathedral (6571013497).jpg
- File:Iceland - Reykjavik 024 - Hallgrimskirkja cathedral (6571014571).jpg
- File:Iceland - Reykjavik 043 - Hallgrimskirkja cathedral (6571026853).jpg
- File:Reykjavik Hallgrimskirkja church (1413324848).jpg
- File:Reykjavik, Hallgrimskirkja (6796777031).jpg
- File:Reykjavik-Hallgrimskirkja 2032.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete As per nomination. russavia (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment File:Reykjavik-Hallgrimskirkja 2032.jpg is not a building, as is it is stated in DR. The builing is there, of course, but it is not the object of the photo. --Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 19:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- The entire building is copyrighted, both the interior and the exterior. I would assume that the pulpit is a part of the building. If not, it is probably copyrightable anyway. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- I won't argue about that. Just delete. --Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 19:27, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- The entire building is copyrighted, both the interior and the exterior. I would assume that the pulpit is a part of the building. If not, it is probably copyrightable anyway. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- migrate to english wikipedia, "FoP-USonly|Iceland|2020" . Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 22:48, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- Files in Category:Hallgrímskirkja
Guðjón Samúelsson died in 1950. Undelete in 2021.
.jpg){kind=link}
russavia (talk) 06:47, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment It seems a bit depressing to see a lack of definition of FoP in Iceland leading to these deletions of educational and good quality photographs of buildings (not just my uploads). Perhaps there are two things that could happen as a community?
- Could someone advise as to who holds the rights for Samúelsson's estate? Perhaps there is an existing Architecture company that does this, or an identifiable descendant?
- How can we lobby the Icelandic parliament, perhaps there has already been significant ground work here? An explanatory letter to Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir, with these cases of the loss of high quality images that represent Iceland in the global public domain, just because Iceland has out of date law on FoP, ought to cause some concern for the damage this causes to Iceland's presence on the global stage.
- --Fæ (talk) 07:19, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Files are still copyrighted, no FOP in Iceland -FASTILY 05:42, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hallgrímskirkja
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Iceland: the church is work by Guðjón Samúelsson (d. 1950).
File:Air Iceland Fokker 50, TF-JMR@RKV,07.07.2009-543af - Flickr - Aero Icarus.jpg(church is probably incidental – Taivo)- File:Hallgrimskirkja 2012.JPG
- File:Iceland - Reykjavik 050 - view from the Perlan (6571034905).jpg (I opened photo with full size and the church is only building, which is well seen – Taivo)
- File:Iceland - Reykjavik 052 - Hallgrimskirkja cathedral (6571036125).jpg (church is in file name and description, so it is difficult to argue, that this is de minimis – Taivo)
- File:Iceland -- 2008-08-02 16-45-16.jpg
- File:Reykjavik (8).jpg
- File:Reykjavik Aðflug Braut 19.JPG
- File:Reykjavik Hil.jpg (church is here not incidental: there is exactly one opening in treerow and the church is exactly in this place – Taivo)
- File:Reykjavik, Iceland-13July2011.jpg (I opened photo with full size and the church is only building, which is well seen – Taivo)
- File:Skólavarðan.jpeg
- File:Vörðuskóli.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 08:18, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Refer to my comment from last time. --Fæ (talk) 08:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep File:Air Iceland Fokker 50, TF-JMR@RKV,07.07.2009-543af - Flickr - Aero Icarus.jpg (the subject is the aircraft), File:Iceland - Reykjavik 050 - view from the Perlan (6571034905).jpg (this is a panoramic view of Reykjavik), File:Iceland - Reykjavik 052 - Hallgrimskirkja cathedral (6571036125).jpg (another panoramic), File:Reykjavik Aðflug Braut 19.JPG (another panoramic), File:Reykjavik Hil.jpg (another panoramic), File:Reykjavik, Iceland-13July2011.jpg (another panoramic). Delete the rest. russavia (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Judged by the description, the usage and the composition of these images, the church is not de minimis. It is not included "entirely accidentally and incidentally", it does "form an essential part of the composition", and it is not "shown with insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity". It is evident even to a fleeting observer and could not be replaced at will with another work. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:33, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep the panoramas of the city. The church is somewhat incidental in the scene. Snowmanradio (talk) 09:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Let's review it one by one:
- File:Air Iceland Fokker 50, TF-JMR@RKV,07.07.2009-543af - Flickr - Aero Icarus.jpg - not incidental, gives the context to the image.
- File:Iceland - Reykjavik 050 - view from the Perlan (6571034905).jpg - the church is mentioned among the keywords in Flickr, it is mentioned in the description, the image has been categorised in relation to it.
- File:Iceland - Reykjavik 052 - Hallgrimskirkja cathedral (6571036125).jpg - the church is mentioned in the title of the image, the description states "Hallgrimskirkja cathedral shines in the autumn light", the only category refers to the church.
- File:Reykjavik Aðflug Braut 19.JPG - the description states: "You can easily see the Hallgrimskirkja church ... dominating the Reykjavík skyline with old town Reykjavík surrounding the church." With other words, the dominating (key) element is the church, and the old town is only of secondary importance and gives the context. The image has been extensively used to illustrate articles about the church.
- File:Reykjavik Hil.jpg - the description: "Reykjavík, Hallgrímskirkja" (i.e. Reykjavik, specifically Hallgrímskirkja). The image has been used to illustrate articles about the church and categorised in relation to the church.
- File:Reykjavik, Iceland-13July2011.jpg - the description: "View from the top of Perlan showing the spire of Hallgrímskirkja." The description itself is clear enough: the photo shows the church. Also in Flickr: "The spire style building which grabs attention in the picture is "Hallgrimskirkja".".
- --Eleassar (t/p) 10:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Let's review it one by one:
Keep per Russavia. Responding to Eleassar's most far-fetched justifications:
- File:Air Iceland Fokker 50, TF-JMR@RKV,07.07.2009-543af - Flickr - Aero Icarus.jpg - "[Hallgrimskirkja] gives the context to the image" - what context exactly? The picture would be just as valuable for illustrating the airframe without the church
- The church is a very recognisable building in Reykjavik. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- So what does the location has to do with the airline, the plane type or that specific airframe? Air Iceland flies to 13 destinations and the picture would be equally useful in any of those airports.--Strainu (talk) 19:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know, but evidently the intent was to photograph the plane with a recognisable building behind it, designating the location (like the Eiffel Tower would in Paris). Perhaps because it's Air Iceland, which has its head office in Reykjavik. --Eleassar (t/p) 20:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- The church is a very recognisable building in Reykjavik. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Iceland - Reykjavik 050 - view from the Perlan (6571034905).jpg - Flickr members currently add many keywords, some only tangential to the picture; The categorization was made after the upload, by a different user and can be reversed. Commons:De minimis is all about how the image is used, not necessarily about how it can be used. That's why {{De minimis}} warns against cropping the image etc.--Strainu (talk) 13:24, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Different interpretations are possible, but if the original Flickr uploader and the person who added the category agree that the church is a key element, this makes it clear enough. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Icelandic law allows photos of buildings if the building isn't the main subject of the image. This seems less restrictive than standard de minimis. Compare with this Danish text about Category:Statue of the Little Mermaid (Copenhagen). The "main subject" idea also appears in Danish, Finnish and Norwegian law with regard to artworks such as statues.
- Delete:
- File:Hallgrimskirkja 2012.JPG
- File:Vörðuskóli.jpg - the main subject is the school (is:Vörðuskóli), while the church is de minimis. Delete because of the school, not because of the church. Undelete in 2020 (both the church and the school were made by the same architect).
- File:Skólavarðan.jpeg - the file name suggests that the main subject is is:Skólavarðan (Reykjavík), but the church looks very prominent on the picture and the picture shows unnecessarily much of the church if the other construction is supposed to be the main subject
- Keep:
- File:Air Iceland Fokker 50, TF-JMR@RKV,07.07.2009-543af - Flickr - Aero Icarus.jpg - the main subject is the plane
- File:Iceland - Reykjavik 050 - view from the Perlan (6571034905).jpg - no building is the main subject
- File:Iceland - Reykjavik 052 - Hallgrimskirkja cathedral (6571036125).jpg - no building is the main subject
- File:Reykjavik Hil.jpg - no building is the main subject
- File:Reykjavik, Iceland-13July2011.jpg - no building is the main subject
Neutral:
- File:Iceland -- 2008-08-02 16-45-16.jpg - one could maybe claim that the main subject is the stuff covering the church instead of the church itself
- File:Reykjavik (8).jpg - multiple buildings, unclear if the church can be claimed to be the main subject.
- File:Reykjavik Aðflug Braut 19.JPG - not sure if the building counts as the "main subject" or not. In the Danish court case mentioned above, the mermaid statue didn't appear at a prominent location ("en fremtrædende plads") in the collage, but in this case, the church seems to be at a prominent location. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Per Article 16 that you have mentioned at my talk page, it is true that a work must be the main subject for an image to not be de minimis. However, I wonder what is the main subject of the following images if not the church:
- The church is mentioned among the keywords in Flickr, it is mentioned in the description, the image has been categorised in relation to it.
- The church is mentioned in the title of the image, the description states "Hallgrimskirkja cathedral shines in the autumn light", the only category refers to the church.
- The description reads: "Reykjavík, Hallgrímskirkja" (i.e. Reykjavik, specifically Hallgrímskirkja). The image has been used to illustrate articles about the church and categorised in relation to the church.
- The description reads: "View from the top of Perlan showing the spire of Hallgrímskirkja." The description itself is clear enough: the photo shows the church. Also in Flickr: "The spire style building which grabs attention in the picture is "Hallgrimskirkja".".
- For the rest, my comment is the following:
- File:Iceland -- 2008-08-02 16-45-16.jpg - seems comparable to [6]: a silhouette of a man is a portrait, therefore a silhouette of a church is a picture of the church. The intent was to show exactly this church, not just some church, during restauration.
- File:Reykjavik (8).jpg - in contrast to the church, which takes place over half of the image, the rest of buildings are hardly discernable.
- File:Reykjavik Aðflug Braut 19.JPG - the description states "the Hallgrimskirkja church dominating the Reykjavík skyline with old town Reykjavík surrounding the church"; with other words, the church is the principal object, and the rest is accessory.
- --Eleassar (t/p) 07:55, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Per Article 16 that you have mentioned at my talk page, it is true that a work must be the main subject for an image to not be de minimis. However, I wonder what is the main subject of the following images if not the church:
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Postcard_of_Ljubljana,_Pre%C5%A1eren_Square_at_night_%284%29.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, but one kept. Hallgrímskirkja is simply too big building for Reykjavik and spoils most photos, even some panoramas. Taivo (talk) 20:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hallgrímskirkja
[edit]These pictures show a non-free architectural work by w:Guðjón Samúelsson and/or a non-free sculpture by w:Alexander Stirling Calder.
- File:109-0939 IMG (479675694).jpg
- File:109-0943 IMG (482642929).jpg
- File:2 talking (477365563).jpg
- File:An high look and a proud heart (2514256203).jpg
- File:Fast movement (603380846).jpg
- File:From another view (484183785).jpg
- File:Get me to the church on time (7091019531).jpg
- File:Halgrimskirka (13940299208).jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja (interno).jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja-Reykjavík.jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja and Leifur Eiríksson statue.JPG
- File:Hallgrímskirkja Reykjavík 2011.jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja Side.jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja, Reykjavik (6969741142).jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja, Reykjavik (7115823577).jpg
- File:High time (2514265157).jpg
- File:Higher (1251292238).jpg
- File:Higher (741150725).jpg
- File:Inside Hallgrímskirkja HDR.jpg
- File:Kirkjujól 2008 (3150666873).jpg
- File:Last Christmas (3160371678).jpg
- File:Leif Ericson (5809725470).jpg
- File:Leif Eriksson and Hallgrimskirkja closeup.JPG
- File:Leif Eriksson and Hallgrimskirkja.JPG
- File:Leifur Ericsson (4047301286).jpg
- File:Let There Be Peace on Earth (3151940908).jpg
- File:Specific stage (508084041).jpg
- File:Stand tall (2515086168).jpg
- File:Viewpoint (500998529).jpg
- File:Á ferð með Leifi heppna (603380862).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- WTF?!?! —[ˈjøːˌmaˑ] 18:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- If you look at Category:Hallgrímskirkja, you will find a simple instruction at the top of the page: "Attention: Upload only photographs taken of buildings whose architect died before 1944." You didn't follow this instruction when you uploaded a photograph of a building whose architect died in 1950. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- This is ridiculous and would make wp:commons useless. —[ˈjøːˌmaˑ] 18:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- It's the way things work in many countries. See File:Freedom of Panorama in Europe.svg: you can only upload pictures of recent buildings from green, blue and yellow countries, but not from red countries. If the country is green or blue, then you may additionally upload pictures of recent statues. If the country is red, then express permission is needed from the architect (or the architect's heir if the architect is dead) unless the architect has been dead for at least 70 years. You may find this interesting to read. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Going a bit into detail: Iceland does in fact have a form of freedom of panorama, but for non-commercial use only, which isn't suitable for Commons - see here. There is also a new version of the FOP map which is more detailed: File:Levels of Freedom of Panorama in Europe.svg (the brown and light-green countries in this map have "non-commercial FOP", the red ones have no FOP at all). For Commons purposes, there is no practical difference between "no FOP" and "non-commercial FOP only" , but it might be interesting. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- It's the way things work in many countries. See File:Freedom of Panorama in Europe.svg: you can only upload pictures of recent buildings from green, blue and yellow countries, but not from red countries. If the country is green or blue, then you may additionally upload pictures of recent statues. If the country is red, then express permission is needed from the architect (or the architect's heir if the architect is dead) unless the architect has been dead for at least 70 years. You may find this interesting to read. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- This is ridiculous and would make wp:commons useless. —[ˈjøːˌmaˑ] 18:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- If you look at Category:Hallgrímskirkja, you will find a simple instruction at the top of the page: "Attention: Upload only photographs taken of buildings whose architect died before 1944." You didn't follow this instruction when you uploaded a photograph of a building whose architect died in 1950. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. russavia (talk) 19:47, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, copyrighted architecture. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hallgrímskirkja
[edit]The architect died in 1950 and there is no freedom of panorama in Iceland, so this work is still subject to copyright restrictions.
- File:Art&Culture (482734555).jpg
- File:Cathedral - panoramio (10).jpg
- File:Cathedral, Reykjavik - panoramio.jpg
- File:Church of Hallgrímur - Reykjavík - Iceland - HDR - panoramio.jpg
- File:Crow on Hallgrimskirkja church (440948233).jpg
- File:Half mast (1605520380).jpg
- File:Hallgrimms Kirche (Hallgrímskirkja) in Reykjavik, Island, 20 Jh.jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja (3403631894).jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja (3313620340).jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja - panoramio.jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja and Leifur heppni - panoramio.jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja in Black and White.jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja Reykjavík.jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja Tjörnin.jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja, Reykjavik (6969740496).jpg
- File:Iceland Images for April 2016 03.JPG
- File:Iceland Reykjavík Hallgrímskirkja coverd 2008.JPG
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_Reykjavik,_Island,_20_Jh.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Do not delete, the achitecture of the building ist covered due to maintenance. Did you see the picture? So no need to delete. --Bernello (talk) 19:25, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't look closely, and I'm no expert on these things. If that's sufficient to keep the image, by all means do. - Themightyquill (talk) 19:35, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Do not delete, this pic ist just a common streetview. --Bernello (talk) 00:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's a common street view which centres the church, includes the church in the title of the image, and was placed in the churche's category. I find it hard to accept that as de minimis. - Themightyquill (talk) 00:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, I understand that somebody has to clean up here on Commons, and to tell the rules, especially the rules and laws of specific states. So we have the year 2017, an the copyright of the architect is ending in 2020. Why are you on hurry? -- Ok, Joke, but I think, that here on Commons are many other rediculous pictueres to delete. Greetings -- Bernello (talk) 00:52, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Not to worry, Bernello, they can all be set to be undeleted on 1 January 2021. - Themightyquill (talk) 01:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- OK, You are right, you won. There are existing rules and laws, which we may are only patially agree, but we have to follow them all. Have a good time... Greetings --Bernello (talk) 01:38, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Not to worry, Bernello, they can all be set to be undeleted on 1 January 2021. - Themightyquill (talk) 01:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, I understand that somebody has to clean up here on Commons, and to tell the rules, especially the rules and laws of specific states. So we have the year 2017, an the copyright of the architect is ending in 2020. Why are you on hurry? -- Ok, Joke, but I think, that here on Commons are many other rediculous pictueres to delete. Greetings -- Bernello (talk) 00:52, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's a common street view which centres the church, includes the church in the title of the image, and was placed in the churche's category. I find it hard to accept that as de minimis. - Themightyquill (talk) 00:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep @Themightyquill and Bernello: I have renamed the file and description and also cropped it to enable that we keep it according to de minimis. Poco2 10:40, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- File:IS - Reykjavik - Black And White - Cross - Construction - Höfuðborgarsvæðið - Hallgrímskirkja (4889886065).jpg
- File:IS - Reykjavik - Höfuðborgarsvæðið - Hallgrímskirkja - Clock - Road Trip (4889889197).jpg
- File:Look up! (484183787).jpg
- File:Many parts (2444181248).jpg
- File:Night in Reykjavík (1854216277).jpg
- File:Real life (740612440).jpg
- File:Reykjavik - panoramio (11).jpg
- File:Reykjavik - panoramio (12).jpg
- File:Reykjavik.jpg
- File:ReykjavikNewYr.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I would not call this a copyright violation because it is a blurry/artsy image, and in no way capable of producing an accurate copy or facsimile of the church's appearance. 208.100.156.100 21:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- File:Right church (540318282).jpg
- File:Street view, Reykjavík 2014-07-28-2.jpg
- File:Top part (740612496).jpg
- File:Við Hallgrímskirkju (488802962).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. kept two de minimis and two of the clock -- utilitarian. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hallgrímskirkja
[edit]The architect died in 1950 and there is no freedom of panorama in Iceland --тнояsтеn ⇔ 13:29, 5 March 2018 (UTC).
- File:201708 Hallgrímskirkja b35.jpg
- File:201708 Reykjavík Hallgrímskirkja 03.jpg
- File:201708 Reykjavík Hallgrímskirkja 01.jpg
- File:Miðborg, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Miðborg, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Miðborg, Reykjavík, Iceland - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Miðborg, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Miðborg, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland - panoramio (17).jpg
- File:Miðborg, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland - panoramio (20).jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja 8 (24848207913).jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja 7 (25326836501).jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja 4 (25413061095).jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja 5 (24786397093).jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja 2 (25386876116).jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja 1 (24786522963).jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Church Hallgrímskirkja - 2013.08 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Reykjavik Cathedral.jpg
- File:Leifur Eiríksson and Hallgrímskirkja (14527191932).jpg
- and probably some more
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete At least one of these was already deleted above, and the exact same image was reuploaded a month later. - Themightyquill (talk) 13:48, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hallgrímskirkja
[edit]The architect died in 1950 and there is no freedom of panorama in Iceland --тнояsтеn ⇔ 19:53, 14 March 2018 (UTC).
- File:201708 Hallgrímskirkja b33.jpg
- File:201708 Reykjavík Hallgrímskirkja 02.jpg
- File:201708 Hallgrímskirkja b37.jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja church.jpg
- File:Iceland December 2014 (15816334860).jpg
- File:Calle Skólavörðustígur, Reikiavik, Distrito de la Capital, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 111.jpg
- Keep Per de minimis The main subject here is the street Poco2 21:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- File:Hallgrimskirkja 6 (25294821892).jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja up close and personal. - panoramio.jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja, Reykjavík, Iceland (Unsplash).jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja - panoramio.jpg
- File:Iceland December 2014 (15383968363).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; including File:Calle Skólavörðustígur, Reikiavik, Distrito de la Capital, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 111.jpg because the church is very prominent in this image (not de minimis - it would be a completely different photo without Hallgrímskirkja). At least we don't have to wait that long for undeletion now; all images depicting buildings by Guðjón Samúelsson can be restored in 2021 :-). --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hallgrímskirkja
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Iceland
- File:Hallgrimskirkja (3369079913).jpg
- File:Hallgrimskirkja from Perlan, Reykjavík - panoramio.jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja (3313620340).jpg
- File:Hallgrímskirkja20140131.jpg
- File:Kościół Hallgrímskirkja.jpg
- File:Modern Reykjavik Church - panoramio - TumbleCow.jpg
- File:Reykjavik - panoramio (21).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Vera (talk) 11:32, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:06, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:God be here I-IV
[edit]I suspect that these pictures show the copyrighted is:Fossvogskirkja.
- File:God be here (496464004).jpg
- File:God be here II (496464002).jpg
- File:God be here III (496464000).jpg
- File:God be here IV (496463984).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 17:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The uploader failed to send a confirmation that he is the copyright owner despite the requests in pl:wiki [7] on 12/13.08.2014. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 18:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Projekt plakatu do filmu "Seksmisja" Juliusza Machulskiego. Akryl, tektura. Oryginał. Kolekcja prywatna - Warszawa..jpg
[edit]
The uploader failed to send a confirmation that he is the copyright owner despite the requests in pl:wiki [8] on 12/13.08.2014. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 18:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, watermarked as being from airliners.net Guinnog (talk) 18:12, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This building looks recent. Also, the e-mail in the {{Imagewatermark}} makes me suspect that this might not be own work but a copyvio of an advertisement for the hotel. Stefan4 (talk) 18:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per no FOP. User:Stefan4 the email visiticeland@hotmail.com is the photographer's email address. russavia (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. Then FOP should be the only problem. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Háteigskirkja
[edit]Non-free architectural work by Halldór H. Jónsson (see is:Háteigskirkja). See COM:FOP#Iceland.
- File:Háteigschurch (2319295376).jpg
- File:Háteigskirkja01.jpg
- File:I Came Down from Heaven (4071214103).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 18:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
an image of the building from which someone unknown pilots the web. Non-linked Richard Avery (talk) 18:36, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A photo of a German SS officer, most likely from the first half of the 1940ies, claimed to be both PD-Polish and PD-Old. I'm not sure why this is considered to be "PD-Polish". No author is given, so we do not know if he was a Pole, no date or place of publication are given, so we don't know when (if ever) this photo was first published in Poland, the person depicted is German, not Polish, and nothing is said about the place and date that photo was taken. It could have been Poland, Stadie was there, but it cold be elsewhere. And even if it were taken in Poland, that does not mean that "PD-Polish" does automatically apply.
As for the "PD-Old" claim: No author is named, so how can anyone claim that he is indeed dead for at least 70 years? If the photo was taken in the 1940ies, he could well have lived for many years after 1943.
So in essence, we do not have enough information to assume that this photo is either "PD-Polish" or "PD-Old". Because of this, it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I totally understand the concept of precautionary measure and I'm not opposed to it. I'd like clarify, however, that this is a historical image from World War II of a Holocaust perpetrator active in Nazi occupied Poland (specifially, at Treblinka extermination camp in German-occupied Poland where up to a million Jews have perished). According to the Art. 3 of copyright law of March 29, 1926 of the Republic of Poland and Art. 2 of copyright law of July 10, 1952 of the People's Republic of Poland, all photographs published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed public domain in Poland. Therefore, no information (i.e. no clear copyright notice attached to it) ammounts to this photograph falling into the public domain category. Poeticbent talk 00:06, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- But we don't even know if this is a "Polish" photograph, I wrote quite lot about that above, and we know nothing about the time and place of first publication and if it was accompanied by any copyright notice or not. So we simply cannot know if any of these provisions actually apply here. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- I totally understand the concept of precautionary measure and I'm not opposed to it. I'd like clarify, however, that this is a historical image from World War II of a Holocaust perpetrator active in Nazi occupied Poland (specifially, at Treblinka extermination camp in German-occupied Poland where up to a million Jews have perished). According to the Art. 3 of copyright law of March 29, 1926 of the Republic of Poland and Art. 2 of copyright law of July 10, 1952 of the People's Republic of Poland, all photographs published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed public domain in Poland. Therefore, no information (i.e. no clear copyright notice attached to it) ammounts to this photograph falling into the public domain category. Poeticbent talk 00:06, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:02, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No meaningful information, description untranslatable, 6 years unused or uncatagorised. Richard Avery (talk) 18:39, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Undescribed, standard image, non-linked Richard Avery (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
poor quality image, description says "METAL DOORS WITH POSTS AND CHIP OPENING", non-linked Richard Avery (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
A chandelier top with a painted rooster background, little to commend it for any notable characteristics Richard Avery (talk) 18:43, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Photo in apparently private location carries no indication that the subjects consented to broad publication of their likeness. See COM:IDENT Pete F (talk) 18:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by NigelSoft as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free web screenshot. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar reasoning as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Otto Stadie (SS-man).jpg: A photo of a German SS officer, said to be from after 1945, claimed to be both PD-Polish and PD-Old. I'm not sure why this is considered to be "PD-Polish". No author is given, so we do not know if he was a Pole, no date or place of publication are given, so we don't know when (if ever) this photo was first published in Poland, the person depicted is German, not Polish, and nothing is said about the place and date that photo was taken. It could have been Poland, but it cold have been elsewhere. And even if it were taken in Poland, that does not mean that "PD-Polish" does automatically apply. As for the "PD-Old" claim: No author is named, so how can anyone claim that he is indeed dead for at least 70 years? And if the photo was taken after 1945, the author simply cannot have died in 1943 or earlier. So in essence, we do not have enough information to assume that this photo is either "PD-Polish" or "PD-Old", indeed it cannot be PD-Old if the year givn is correct. For these reasons, it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Similar reply as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Otto Stadie (SS-man).jpg (quote): this is a historical image from World War II of a Holocaust perpetrator active in Nazi occupied Poland (specifially, at Treblinka extermination camp in German-occupied Poland where up to a million Jews have perished). According to the Art. 3 of copyright law of March 29, 1926 of the Republic of Poland and Art. 2 of copyright law of July 10, 1952 of the People's Republic of Poland, all photographs published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed public domain in Poland. Therefore, no information (i.e. no clear copyright notice attached) ammounts to this photograph falling into the public domain category, similar to all others. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 00:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- But we don't even know if this is a "Polish" photograph, I wrote quite lot about that above, and we know nothing about the time and place of first publication and if it was accompanied by any copyright notice or not. So we simply cannot know if any of these provisions actually apply here. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Similar reply as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Otto Stadie (SS-man).jpg (quote): this is a historical image from World War II of a Holocaust perpetrator active in Nazi occupied Poland (specifially, at Treblinka extermination camp in German-occupied Poland where up to a million Jews have perished). According to the Art. 3 of copyright law of March 29, 1926 of the Republic of Poland and Art. 2 of copyright law of July 10, 1952 of the People's Republic of Poland, all photographs published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed public domain in Poland. Therefore, no information (i.e. no clear copyright notice attached) ammounts to this photograph falling into the public domain category, similar to all others. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 00:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:04, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
publicité (avis partagé par User:Lomita) JackAttack (talk) 19:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Non sense ! If every picture looking like advertising should be deleted then ask for deletion of each image with a logo (cars, food boxes, drinks, stores, streets, cameras...).
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
publicité (avis partagé par User:Lomita) JackAttack (talk) 19:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Non sense ! If every picture looking like advertising should be deleted then ask for deletion of each image with a logo (cars, food boxes, drinks, stores, streets, cameras...).
Deleted: INeverCry 01:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
picture is a hoax, and is being used to promote a hoax, creator of page was banned at English Wikipedia for spamming this picture [9] (i.e., all the edits made in August 2014) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apokryltaros (talk • contribs) 2014-08-19T19:31:05 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Not educationally useful: Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Portrait of the legendary (probably fictional) character. No sources. No presence in the publications. OR, or better - total fantastic. Grzegorz B. (talk) 19:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tianminglaura (talk · contribs)
[edit]"The author gives the permission to take her photo for educational purposes", means invalid license for Commons.
- File:Lena-hades4.jpg
- File:Lena-hades3.jpg
- File:Lena-Hades painting.jpg
- File:Lena Hades painting from the oil painting cycle Thus spake Zarathustra.jpg
A.Savin 19:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit d'une publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
COPYVIO http://www.bonbonshalal.com/sweets.jpg JackAttack (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Contemporary statues in Moscow - there is no Panorama Freedom for sculpture in Russia.
- File:Мемориальная доска, П.О. Сухой.jpg
- File:Памятник Манасу (Москва).jpg
- File:Памятник Хлеб (Москва).jpg
- File:Памятник Плодородие (Москва).jpg
- File:Памятник венгеро-советской дружбы (Москва).jpg
- File:Памятник героям фильма "Офицеры".jpg
- File:Памятник Рабиндранату Тагору (Москва).jpg
- File:Памятник Сервантесу (Москва).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A.Savin 20:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not the real logo of any existing company called "The Black Box". - Fma12 (talk) 20:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GoodRobbin (talk · contribs)
[edit]No educational content: out of COM:SCOPE and possible copyright violation by derivative scans of artworks.
- File:Метромост над Москва-рекой, пастель (1994).jpg
- File:Новодевичий монастырь 1991.jpg
- File:Плакат группы The Parkers (2001).jpg
- File:Афиша кавер-группы The Parkers (2006).jpg
- File:Друг спешит.jpg
- File:Новогодняя фото открытка.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A.Savin 20:28, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Эти файлы, в дальнейшем, могут пригодиться, как наглядные изображения или в качестве сопровождения какой-либо статьи, а могут и нет. Мне не вполне ясно, почему они должны обязательно содержать именно обучающую информацию, но не буду спорить, поскольку это не принципиально.
Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio probable JackAttack (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
copyright volaghe Meysam (talk) 20:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely other IE logos hosted here, the gradients and other 3D effects on this logo seem to be complex enough to consider this logo above the ToO. - Fma12 (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- This logo is the only logo for Internet Explorer 7-8. I see no reason for deletion. --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 17:57, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Being the only IE 7/8 logo is not a valid reason to be kept here if it is above the TOO. - Fma12 (talk) 01:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- I have a feeling that my opinion is irrelevant. Can I ask why this File:Internet Explorer 4 and 5 logo.svg and all others in the Category:Internet Explorer logos for deletion?? --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 16:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Sculptor died in 1992, no FoP for statues in Russia A.Savin 20:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Alexjhosue
[edit]- File:Aqui hace muchos años era prision y cuando el mar subia se aogaban los presos.JPG
- File:En la orrila del casco antiguo con vista al oceano pacifico.JPG
- File:En el casco antiguo visitando la historia.JPG
Personal images, out of scope. --AxeEffect (talk) 21:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Derivative scans of Soviet photographs (not PD yet), low-res files without EXIF, all claimed as "own work" under CC-BY-SA, supposed copyright violation
- File:Гордиенко П А.jpg
- File:Храм Водянское.jpg
- File:Белецкое Шевченко.jpg
- File:Єлеватор Гинант.jpg
- File:Храм Новодонецкое.jpg
- File:Клуб Шахтёр.jpg
- File:Гор совет.jpg
- File:Кожевников Інокентій Серафимович.jpg
- File:Татарин комиссар.jpg
- File:Юрьевка.jpg
- File:Патріарха шахтарській літератури Павло Беспощадний,.jpg
- File:Октябрское.jpg
- File:. Я. Герштейн.jpg
- File:Бердянск 22 апреля.jpg
- File:"Эльпифидор"410.jpg
- File:Enakievo krasnye.jpg
- File:Revolyutsionnyiy-miting-v-Luganske-may-1917-goda.jpg
- File:Самарська паланка.jpg
- File:Кость (Костянти́н) Миха́йлович Герасиме́нко.jpg
- File:Демьян Семёнов.jpg
- File:Водянская СШ..jpg
- File:Храм в Светлом.jpg
- File:Alekseev-Ivan-Kum.jpg
- File:Правительство ДКР.jpg
- File:Маєток графа Роговського.jpg
- File:Братская могила П.jpg
- File:Забойщики.jpg
- File:Печерица.jpg
- File:Село Криворожье.jpg
- File:Песчаный Доб,.jpg
- File:Дмитровский храм.jpg
- File:Концлагерь Каменка.jpg
- File:1 май Шидлово.jpg
- File:Детский дом Шидлово 1934.jpg
- File:Нью Йорк.jpg
- File:Рухимовичь.jpg
- File:Васильченко 1.jpg
- File:Земельный банк Х.jpg
- File:Метрополь Х.jpg
- File:Гутник.jpg
- File:Юдін Григорій Фролович.jpg
- File:Святогоровка 1935 год.jpg
- File:Novodonetskoe Dobropillya 5.jpg
- File:Novodonetskoe Dobropillya z.jpg
- File:Vodyanoe Dobropolskiy 1.jpg
- File:Ник. Анцифиров..jpg
- File:Шахтёрская лампочка.jpg
- File:Молчание не золото.jpg
- File:Анцыферов.jpg
- File:Магидов.jpg
- File:Баглюк 2.jpg
- File:Синий заяц.jpg
- File:Мамай Микола Якович.jpeg
- File:Gorlovka prison.jpg
- File:Vosstan.jpg
- File:А.С. Гречнев..jpg
- File:Журнал Забой.jpeg
- File:Donetskiy-ugol-dolzhen-byit-nash-plakat.jpg
- File:Круссер.jpg
- File:-Gekker.jpg
- File:Lugansk-ulitsa-Dalya-7.gif
- File:Рухимович.jpg
- File:Dvoryanskoe-sobranie-Harkov.jpg
- File:Луганского Совета рабочих депутатов 1917 года.gif
- File:Флаг ДКР.gif
- File:Храм село Ленино.jpg
- File:Меаеток Судерманна.jpg
- File:Беспощадный с женой.jpg
- File:Успенский храм Свтогоровк.jpg
- File:Анциферов.jpg
- File:Забой 2.jpg
- File:Забой.jpg
- File:Лев Скрыпник.jpg
- File:1334986941 teatralnaya-ploschad.jpg
_%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%CC%81%D0%B9%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%CC%81%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A.Savin 21:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:"Донецькі сонети".jpg
- File:Юрій Черкаский.jpg
- File:Безпощадний Павло.jpg
- File:Літератори Краматорська.jpg
- File:Дем'ян Захарович Семенов.jpg
- File:Борис Котов.jpg
- File:Кость Герасіменко.jpg
- File:Журнал Забой.jpg
- File:Забой Константиновка.jpg
- File:Забой.jpg
- File:Лев Скрипник.jpg
- File:Селівановський Олексій Павлович.jpg
- File:Koc Arkadiy.jpg
- File:Революція в Донбасі 1905 р..jpg
- File:Vasilchenko.jpg
- File:Павло́ Безпоща́дний 30-х.jpg
- File:Плакат 1919 року.jpg
- File:Тютюники.jpg
- File:1935 р колгосп ім. Сталіна.jpg
- File:Бодашко Михайло.jpg
- File:Тремба Іван Титович.jpg
- File:Татарин Василь Фомич.jpg
- File:Уряд ДКР.Харьков.jpg
- File:Исаев П. И..jpg
- File:Юдін Григорій Фролович.jpg
- File:Храм с Святогоровка.jpg
- File:Храм с Октябрское.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:28, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Not "own work". It's from [10]. No evidence of free license. Photo of an Iraqi poet born 1925. Unclear when it was taken and by whom, and when it was first published. So we don't know if it's an Iraqi or a Lebanese work, and we also don't know whether {{PD-Lebanon}} or {{PD-Lebanon-Photo}} or maybe an Iraq-related tag might apply. Therefore delete per COM:PCP unless information can be found and PD status ascertained.
In any case, if kept, the file description page needs fixing: source, author, and appropriate license tag. Lupo 21:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Argentine sports logos
[edit]1) Despite being licensed as {{PD-textlogo}}, the following Argentine sports badges are complex enough to be above the ToO:
- File:Escudo de olimpo.png
- File:Escudo del Club Olimpo de Bahia Blanca.svg
- File:Escudo Olimpo BB.png
- File:Club Deportivo La Movediza de Tandil.JPG
- File:Escudo oficial del Centenario.jpg
- File:Club banco nacion logo.png
- File:Argentino rugby logo.png
2) Logos of non-notable clubs, neither used in any Wiki project:
3) Unclear copyright status (no proof that they were published more than 50 years ago as stated):
Fma12 (talk) 21:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il s'agit de publicité. JackAttack (talk) 20:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of modern sculpture No FoP in Finland (FoP for architecture only) A.Savin 22:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be publicity still; no evidence this is own work as asserted. See [11]. KinuP (talk) 23:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be copyvio of candidate publicity photo; see [12] and related images. KinuP (talk) 23:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Sophisticated logo, vague authorship claim, unlikely to be licensed by {{Attribution}}. Logo is unused. Recommend delete as COPYVIO. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 23:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
logo of unremarkable company; not in use by any WMF project. Senator2029 15:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:37, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Capricorn4049 (talk) 23:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Capricorn4049 (talk) 23:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
© Juvenile Dignitaries, All rights reserved.http://www.jdignitaries.org/ Sridhar1000 (talk) 10:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Unused logo of a user's personal website. Delete as self-promotional. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 00:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Passports of Australia
[edit]Non-free Australian Crown Copyright. Some of the files are claimed to be under a non-derivative licence, although the link is broken.
- File:AUSSIEPASSPORT.jpg
- File:Australia ePassport chip page.jpeg
- File:Australian ePassport.jpeg
- File:Australian ePassports Information page.jpeg
- File:Australianpassport Lseries.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 18:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:22, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Passports of Australia
[edit]Missing permission from the Australian government.
_of_a_P-Series_Australian_passport,_issued_in_July_2014.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 12:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 07:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Fake license. Picture dated 1940 cant be "own", it's a part of unknown collection, book or article. Bilderling (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Fake license. Picture dated 1940 cant be "own", it's a part of unknown collection, book or article. Bilderling (talk) 13:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Fake license. Picture dated 1940 cant be "own", it's a part of unknown collection, book or article. Bilderling (talk) 13:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Fake license. Picture is old and cant be "own", it's a part of unknown collection, book or article. Bilderling (talk) 13:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
![13:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/08/19#c-Bilderling-2014-08-19T13:14:00.000Z-File:Хамит_Кульмамет_в_пьесе_"Зулейха".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 14:56, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
![14:56, 26 August 2014 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/08/19#c-JurgenNL-2014-08-26T14:56:00.000Z-File:Хамит_Кульмамет_в_пьесе_"Зулейха".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15561659860).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15746509615).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![16:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/08/19#c-HyperGaruda-20220923160600-File:Хамит_Кульмамет_в_пьесе_"Зулейха".jpg){kind=link}
![16:23, 4 October 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/08/19#c-Fitindia-20221004162300-File:Хамит_Кульмамет_в_пьесе_"Зулейха".jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 34
[edit]No FOP in Morocco
- File:Arcs de la Mosquée Hassan-II.jpg
- File:Hassan II Mosque - Grande Mosquée Hassan II.jpg
- File:Mosque Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco, 摩洺哥.jpg
- File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg
- File:Mosquée Hassan II -2.jpg
- File:Mustapha ennaimi - 23768064204.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Furthermore File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg is previously published and would need a separate VRT permission from the photographer even if we obtained a general permission for the mosque. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: by Krd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 35
[edit]No FOP in Morocco
- File:Casablanca, Morocco (51256636929).jpg
- File:الدار البيضاء مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg
- File:جامع الحسن الثاني.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Пусто, есть файл "File:Flag of Kremenchuk.svg" TheVovaNik (talk) 18:30, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:36, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Links are broken, FastCCI does what the link promises to do. FDMS 4 19:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 07:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alekborodina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, sort of private photo album.
- File:Ballerina Liudmila Titova for Serenity+Scott Cosmetics.jpg
- File:Mark Dougan, International businessman, and girlfriend, world renown prima ballerina Liudmila Titova.jpg
- File:Liudmila-Titova-White-Swan.jpg
- File:Mark Dougan, International businessman, and his girlfriend, world renown prima ballerina Liudmila Titova.jpg
- File:World renown prima ballerina Liudmila Titova, with boyfriend, international businessman Mark Dougan, standing in front of the Bolshoi Theatre.jpg
- File:World renown prima ballerina Liudmila Titova, with boyfriend, international businessman Mark Dougan, standing on Moscow Bridge.jpg
- File:American and Russian Businessman Mark Dougan with friend, world renown ballerina Erica De La O and E Scott Thompson of Serenity+Scott Cosmetics.jpg
- File:American and Russian Businessman Mark Dougan with friend, world renown classical pianist Lindsay Garritson.JPG
- File:American and Russian Businessman Mark Dougan stands in Red Square.jpg
- File:American and Russian Businessman Mark Dougan flying jet.jpg
- File:Mark Dougan with Friend and Pop Singer Elizaveta.jpg
- File:American and Russian Businessman Mark Dougan flying to a meeting.jpg
- File:American and Russian Businessman Mark Dougan meets with Russian Secretary of State Pavel Borodin.jpg
- File:American and Russian Businessman Mark Dougan with Russian Oligarchs Nickolay Polyushkin and Dmitry Chernioglo.jpg
- File:American and Russian Businessman Mark Dougan meets with Serenity+Scott.jpg
- File:American and Russian Businessman Mark Dougan at Donald Trump's Home.JPG
- File:Mark Dougan, piloting a Diamond DA-40.JPG
- File:Liudmila Titova, Ballerina with the Royal Moscow Ballet.JPG
- File:Liudmila Titova in Black Swan.jpg
A.Savin 20:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- At least one of the images, File:Liudmila Titova in Black Swan.jpg, seems to be a copyvio. See the image at [13] and copyright info at [14]. Lambtron (talk) 20:37, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Mr. Savin, I am an expert in the ballet, and I have written about Ms. Titova in Wikipedia, and I am adding more. These photos focus on the subject I write on. I have uploaded about one dozen photographs about the subject, yet I see you have uploaded over 5,000. Who it is that has a private photo gallery? Surely you cannot have written on 5,000 different subjects.
- If you delete those photos, you will be deleting photos that are vital to the Wiki article Liudmila_Titova_(ballerina)
- Regarding your copyright vio notice, it was used by the paper in Dubai, but taken by me, given to them by Ms. Titova.
- Alekborodina
- Most of the photos show a certain Mark Dougan who is surely not notable. Liudmila Titova has just an entry (promotional?) on enwiki, and for the authorship of the photoyou refer to, you'll have to confirm it via COM:OTRS. --A.Savin 09:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- You must know all about this person to claim he surely is not notable. I am currently working on an article about him. He is the first non-russian mayor of a Russian city. I would say this alone makes him notable, as well as a prominant business person in the USA and Russia. He is also a political activist in the USA.
- Titova's entry is not promotional at all. It is nothing but fact and she is regarded as one of Russia's best ballerinas. Mr Savin, it seems you are trying to "stir the pot." Is this what you do? Look at peoples pages and photos and critizise them because they are not subjects that interest you or because they are not your photos? If this is the norm here, I can do this also since I will probably not be interested in things you write about or photograph. In fact, I looked at your photos, and realize you have so many duplicates of the same things and so many things with no educational value at all. Mostly just a bunch of buildings, skylines and other items that really do not mean much to someone like myuself, because I am interested in interesting people. Alekborodina 08:48, 21 August 2014 (+4 Moscow)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS to get these restored FASTILY 07:36, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Il existe une version de meilleur qualité : File:British Isles Venn Diagram-en (2).png Thomas500 (talk) 22:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 07:36, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
A still from the 1963 Soviet movie. No valid reason to believe it is copyfree. Ghirlandajo (talk) 06:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep It does not say it is copy free, proper attribution to Mosfilm is there. The movie is on youtube under standard license and 1 shot from it should qualify as a fair use to illustrate the street view.--VISaf (talk) 15:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think you can upload any screenshot from YouTube to Wikimedia Commons. The author/cinematographer en:Vadim Yusov died last year. P.S. There is no street view in the picture, so it cannot be used to illustrate anything meaningful. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 05:44, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- The main question is the license - I did not put a free license there, it has a proper attribution. As to a street view it is smack in the middle of the shot. The street runs from 5 o'clock to 10 o'clock. And it perfectly illustrates the period, when the small buildings on the right side of the street in the middle of the shot were still present instead of the huge monstrosity that is there now.--VISaf (talk) 14:11, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not a big expert on the wiki licensing, so if anyone thinks that this situation can be corrected just by changing the license on the file - I would appreciate the help. --VISaf (talk) 14:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- The main question is the license - I did not put a free license there, it has a proper attribution. As to a street view it is smack in the middle of the shot. The street runs from 5 o'clock to 10 o'clock. And it perfectly illustrates the period, when the small buildings on the right side of the street in the middle of the shot were still present instead of the huge monstrosity that is there now.--VISaf (talk) 14:11, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think you can upload any screenshot from YouTube to Wikimedia Commons. The author/cinematographer en:Vadim Yusov died last year. P.S. There is no street view in the picture, so it cannot be used to illustrate anything meaningful. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 05:44, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrigt violation; if you have permission pls use Commons:OTRS Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Not updated. Actual file: Карта боевых действий на Востоке Украины.svg. Vitez Kojo (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Not updated. Actual file: Карта боевых действий на Востоке Украины.svg. Vitez Kojo (talk) 18:06, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: I don't see why this image should be deleted. It isn't an actual file, but the title and description makes that clear. JurgenNL (talk) 15:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Not updated. Actual file: Карта боевых действий на Востоке Украины.svg. Vitez Kojo (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed. --Metrancya (talk) 16:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Its obsolete now EllsworthSK (talk) 17:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. and continue working on the SVGs. RobiH (talk) 09:05, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. It's indeed outdated, but the history of changes of this map is important. Through different versions of the map we can see the dynamics of changes in the territories. --Alex1961 (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Absolutely agree with Alex1961 - "It's indeed outdated, but the history of changes of this map is important. Through different versions of the map we can see the dynamics of changes in the territories." TremBITa
- Keep, per Alex1961. he file must be kept for historical reasons, and updated here rather than with another filename. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, per Alex1961 --N KOziTalk 10:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The alternative proposed is not updated at all. Also, keep for historical reasons. MGTom (talk) 11:16, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep until we'll have a high-quality gif file with the progress of this during to historical reasons. After making such a file I would also propose to delete this in order not to save many extra copies of the same file. --Vlad Ukr (talk) 12:54, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Per Alex1961. JurgenNL (talk) 15:04, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Low quality image. Probably not suited for general use. Better version available at File:Landschap met stenen brug Rijksmuseum SK-A-1935.jpeg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:36, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep in scope, no need to delete it. Multichill (talk) 19:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no need to keep this low quality duplicate. JurgenNL (talk) 16:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
The artwork is far from being trivial Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 06:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: It was published in 1939 so the copyright hasn't expired yet. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:23, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Columbia River Highway Bridges, Spanning various creeks along Columbia River Highway, Portland, Multnomah County, OR HAER ORE,26-PORT,11- (sheet 1 of 1).png. The file to be kept is newer, but has a superior description. — Ipoellet (talk) f.k.a. Werewombat 01:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 03:34, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
It is no longer needed and out-dated 220.246.76.58 09:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not valid reasons for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Please delete 220.246.76.58 03:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- There is an already previous DR that were closed and you don't provided a valid reason for this DR, again. Unless you are the actual uploader (why don't opened this DR with your account?) or the actual copyright holder (use the OTRS system), speedy keep. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- The OTRS system that @Amitie 10g: mentioned is documented here: COM:OTRS -Pete F (talk) 21:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per Amitie -Pete F (talk) 21:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Not a valid reason to delete anything -FASTILY 03:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
kindly please del this image. 119.247.19.230 11:57, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- There are already two DR closed. If you really are the uploader, please provide a valid reason for deletion with your account. If you are not the uploader, please speedy keep and protect this file. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Евгений Мамут (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Adelina7.jpg
- File:Асясяй.jpg
- File:Венеция3.jpg
- File:Аделина.jpg
- File:Гончар2.jpg
- File:Тень.jpg
- File:Слава.jpg
- File:Свинтус.jpg
- File:Гончар.jpg
- File:Гондола.jpg
- File:Borisova.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:12, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Евгений Мамут (talk · contribs)
[edit]No author's permission.
Sealle (talk) 05:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 03:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
The most probable (and declared in description) photographer was Reginald Crundall Punnett (1875–1967). The declared {{PD-Gutenberg}} is not enough since the book was originally published in the UK in 1915. No evidence for it had been published in the USA before 1923. Mithril (talk) 09:51, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- The works are definitely public domain in the US (See [15]), however it seems they are probably still copyrighted in their source country. The UK grants copyright for life of the author plus 70 years. Kaldari (talk) 18:25, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Didn't I say that? :) The materials are protected till 2038. Mithril (talk) 18:39, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted until 2038 FASTILY 03:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
This map depicts the situation of 16th century, but it was drawn in recent years. So we cannot find apposite primary license for this image. Takabeg (talk) 11:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 03:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
looks a lot like advertising, non-linked Richard Avery (talk) 18:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- The trade mark isn't very prominente visible, (only partly readable). It looks, to me, no worse than some exemples that we already have in Category:Caviar, so I'd say keep it. --Elgewen (talk) 12:39, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: probable copyvio. All other files by user are deleted as questionable copyright status FASTILY 03:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Inaccurate duplicate (source, I know) of File:ÖBB Logo Pflatsch neu.svg. FDMS 4 19:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Why wasn't File:ÖBB Logo Pflatsch neu.svg just uploaded as a new file version of File:ÖBB Logo Pflatsch.svg under the same name?? -- AnonMoos (talk) 19:23, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 03:31, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Este organigrama de la Municipalidad Metropolitana de Lima no está actualizado 200.48.214.19 20:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Organogram of the municipality as it was in 2005, nothing wrong with that --ErickAgain 06:44, 20 August 2014 (UTC).
Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 03:36, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not updatet. Actual file: East Ukraine conflict.svg. Vitez Kojo (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Oppose Situation while searching (Dutch) for and among the debris of the MA17 --Lidewij (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: The past has to be documented as well Jcb (talk) 20:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Derivative work of copyrighted content. See COM:SS (although Symbian or parts of it might be free software, I doubt it is in the public domain). FDMS 4 01:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- I am not sure if I have a real justification to save this file. But its just a pic of the mobile and of course the symbian OS snap is on the screen. Can I get a help in blurring that screen area and still keep the image. --Rameshng (talk) 18:08, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
- GIMP is a great tool to do this: Select the part to blur and Click on Filters>Blur>Gaussian Blur. --McZusatz (talk) 21:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW, still not fixed. Natuur12 (talk) 12:26, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. The matter raised by the OP is settled and there is no need to keep this COM:POINTy work. Jee 02:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: As you participated in the first part of my thread in the Village Pump (but not the whole of them), the file still serves for the main purpose. It is not a simple COM:POINT, because there is an answer from ArcSoft Inc. and the file still serves to probe the actual copyright holder of files used in the ArcSoft products (and many other companies). Also, the file is in use in my User page as a profile picture, and therefore is still inside the Project scope. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:43, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 17:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Because this sculpture is still covered by copyright (it was installed in 1979, i.e after 1978), this photo is a non-free derivative work as the U.S. has no freedom of panorama for public sculpture. See previous discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Georgia Guidestones. —RP88 (talk) 06:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- I'm actually wondering if those are eligible for copyright. Five or six rectangular stones. Is the arrangement copyrightable? Seems kinda ordinary, and if astronomically aligned, that would actually lessen the chance. The text might be, but that is more incidental here. Is there a registration on them to show they were considered copyrightable? I actually have my doubts on them. Photos directly of the text might be a little more problematic. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- The author of this sculpture remains anonymous, it's unlikely that they (whoever they are) filed a copyright registration. You might take a look at a drawing showing the arrangement of the sculpture (from here). I think the arrangement is sufficient for the sculpture to be above the threshold of originality. However, you might also consider the rough-hewn scalloping around three edges of the faces of the slabs, I wonder to what degree that is a deliberate artistic choice on the part of the artist considering that they had no difficulty producing a smooth faced stone surface and top. Your thoughts? —RP88 (talk) 03:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
- Unless they actually sculpted each of those pockmarks to simulate a rough-hewn edge, rather than just making it rough-hewn, then no that aspect is not copyrightable. That would be no different than choosing a color, which (in the U.S.) is not copyrightable. The simple fact that choices were made doesn't matter; what matters is the expression from the hand of the author which is actually fixed in its medium. If they just let it be rough-hewn from what happened naturally during cutting, then that is not expression from a human hand. And I think the anonymous author had those made by a granite slab company anyways, not himself. I think the text is probably copyrightable, certainly as a collection of phrases, but I think the only thing about the sculpture which could be copyrightable is the arrangement of the stones, and that is symmetrical... seems pretty thin to me, to be honest. If you arranged say dominoes in the same basic manner, would you really be violating copyright? That is what an arrangement copyright would imply. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think your dominoes example is on point, as the drawing shows that there are three different sizes of slabs (one with a slot); no arrangement of dominoes would reproduce this sculpture. I take it you think some of the files from the previous DR at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Georgia Guidestones were erroneously deleted? —RP88 (talk) 06:43, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, leaning that way. There is definitely a selection and arrangement copyright on the text, and probably a literary copyright on the text itself (even though they are shortish phrases). I don't think any of the individual stones have any other copyright (the slot is a minor addition; symbolic meaning does not enter into the copyrightable equation). You are correct that it's a little bit more involved than arranging dominoes, as there are a couple of different shapes there (goes to the selection part of that), but it does seem to be a very simplistic arrangement, and I am kind of doubtful that it would amount to authorship. It's one stone in the center, four arranged symmetrically on end outwards around it, and one centered placed on top. That is a very simplistic arrangement. There is some discussion of arrangement copyrights in appeals decisions; I can't find a perfect example yet but there are things like this: The gemstones are common shapes. One is square and the other four are elliptical. Individually, each gemstone is a minor variation on a common shape or design. As a whole, the overall arrangement or composition of four elliptical stones around a square in the center is commonplace and typical, lacking the necessary quantum of original authorship. Other ones you might look at are here (photo towards the middle), here, and the court case Satava v. Lowry. Now... in combination with all of the text, that extra aspect would make for a copyrightable arrangement, even if the text was public domain, I'd guess, which would probably make for a valid registration on the whole thing. A judge did rule that this work had a valid copyright as a sculptural work (as did the Copyright Office), and thus ruled (reversing on appeal) against a company making a very similar-looking rock with that same (public domain) poem on it. If the rock was entirely sculpted to look like a rock, that is copyrightable (rather than actually using a chisel and letting the natural fragmentation stay rough). And the combination of the poem, layout, and shape of the rock was ruled copyrightable. The question to me is if that aspect is really shown in the photographs, as opposed to just the arrangement of the stones. A 3-D reproduction of the entire monument (including text) would be a problem, but photos which only show the PD portions of a work are OK, and so the question is are the photos really capturing the full arrangement including the text, or are primarily just of the stones and their arrangement (which I think is probably PD), with the text being incidental. If this photo is a derivative work, I think it's by the slimmest of margins, and I'd lean towards keeping it. But, some of the other photos may have been more problematic. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- So to summarize, you think that the cases you cite support the idea that this sculpture is likely protected by copyright, but you feel that this particular photo is probably OK by virtue of de minimus with regards to the protectable elements? I tend to lean the other way (i.e. towards the photo being a derivative work and thus deleting the photo), however I'll add the {{De minimis}} tag to this photo so that the license reflects your argument should the closing admin choose to keep this file. —RP88 (talk) 18:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- OK, I've added
{{de minimis|Selection and arrangement copyright on the text, probably a literary copyright on text, copyrightable arrangement on work as a whole|reason=See disucssion at [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Georgia Guidestones.jpg]]}}to the license section of File:Georgia Guidestones.jpg. If this image survives this DR, I'll remove the low-res fair-use photo from en:Georgia Guidestones and replace it with this one. —RP88 (talk) 19:25, 23 August 2014 (UTC)- Most of the cases I cited above were situations were a claimed sculptural work was ruled ineligible. In this case, I think the only copyrightable claim on the work as a whole is based on the text -- if that was not there, I don't think there would be anything to copyright. As such, it's much more possible to have a photograph not be derivative of that aspect. But yes, that last case (which was very much on the edge, and may have been ruled that way also because the rock sculpture itself was copyrightable) does give a little pause. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, leaning that way. There is definitely a selection and arrangement copyright on the text, and probably a literary copyright on the text itself (even though they are shortish phrases). I don't think any of the individual stones have any other copyright (the slot is a minor addition; symbolic meaning does not enter into the copyrightable equation). You are correct that it's a little bit more involved than arranging dominoes, as there are a couple of different shapes there (goes to the selection part of that), but it does seem to be a very simplistic arrangement, and I am kind of doubtful that it would amount to authorship. It's one stone in the center, four arranged symmetrically on end outwards around it, and one centered placed on top. That is a very simplistic arrangement. There is some discussion of arrangement copyrights in appeals decisions; I can't find a perfect example yet but there are things like this: The gemstones are common shapes. One is square and the other four are elliptical. Individually, each gemstone is a minor variation on a common shape or design. As a whole, the overall arrangement or composition of four elliptical stones around a square in the center is commonplace and typical, lacking the necessary quantum of original authorship. Other ones you might look at are here (photo towards the middle), here, and the court case Satava v. Lowry. Now... in combination with all of the text, that extra aspect would make for a copyrightable arrangement, even if the text was public domain, I'd guess, which would probably make for a valid registration on the whole thing. A judge did rule that this work had a valid copyright as a sculptural work (as did the Copyright Office), and thus ruled (reversing on appeal) against a company making a very similar-looking rock with that same (public domain) poem on it. If the rock was entirely sculpted to look like a rock, that is copyrightable (rather than actually using a chisel and letting the natural fragmentation stay rough). And the combination of the poem, layout, and shape of the rock was ruled copyrightable. The question to me is if that aspect is really shown in the photographs, as opposed to just the arrangement of the stones. A 3-D reproduction of the entire monument (including text) would be a problem, but photos which only show the PD portions of a work are OK, and so the question is are the photos really capturing the full arrangement including the text, or are primarily just of the stones and their arrangement (which I think is probably PD), with the text being incidental. If this photo is a derivative work, I think it's by the slimmest of margins, and I'd lean towards keeping it. But, some of the other photos may have been more problematic. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think your dominoes example is on point, as the drawing shows that there are three different sizes of slabs (one with a slot); no arrangement of dominoes would reproduce this sculpture. I take it you think some of the files from the previous DR at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Georgia Guidestones were erroneously deleted? —RP88 (talk) 06:43, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Unless they actually sculpted each of those pockmarks to simulate a rough-hewn edge, rather than just making it rough-hewn, then no that aspect is not copyrightable. That would be no different than choosing a color, which (in the U.S.) is not copyrightable. The simple fact that choices were made doesn't matter; what matters is the expression from the hand of the author which is actually fixed in its medium. If they just let it be rough-hewn from what happened naturally during cutting, then that is not expression from a human hand. And I think the anonymous author had those made by a granite slab company anyways, not himself. I think the text is probably copyrightable, certainly as a collection of phrases, but I think the only thing about the sculpture which could be copyrightable is the arrangement of the stones, and that is symmetrical... seems pretty thin to me, to be honest. If you arranged say dominoes in the same basic manner, would you really be violating copyright? That is what an arrangement copyright would imply. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:24, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- The author of this sculpture remains anonymous, it's unlikely that they (whoever they are) filed a copyright registration. You might take a look at a drawing showing the arrangement of the sculpture (from here). I think the arrangement is sufficient for the sculpture to be above the threshold of originality. However, you might also consider the rough-hewn scalloping around three edges of the faces of the slabs, I wonder to what degree that is a deliberate artistic choice on the part of the artist considering that they had no difficulty producing a smooth faced stone surface and top. Your thoughts? —RP88 (talk) 03:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. The fact that this is the only surviving image from the first DR, that a fair-use version (w:File:Georgia Guidestones-lowres.jpg) exists on en.wiki, and that DM is disputed, suggests that perhaps an undeletion request or discussion at VPC would be helpful. INeverCry 17:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
