Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/06/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 4th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flicker licens 92.238.56.191 22:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (C) ARR on Flickr russavia (talk) 22:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, arguably was used in en.wiki for vandalism. Taivo (talk) 19:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purposes, outside the Project scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: source = internet = copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:07, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr source doesn't allow for commercial use: https://www.flickr.com/photos/wfiupublicradio/8228878969/ Ytoyoda (talk) 04:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong, it is not labeled with that license. The image is available to share (to copy, distribute and transmit the work) and to remix (to adapt the work). Specifically, the work's creator has given it a license of "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic" and the work is appropriately labeled as such here. This has the correct license attached to it and should not be deleted.--YHoshua (talk) 12:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Commons cannot accept work that is licensed for non-commercial purposes only. Do you see what happens when you assign the correct license ({{Cc-by-nd-2.0}}? Ytoyoda (talk) 15:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: non-commarcial license not accepted Ankry (talk) 06:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, arguably was used in en.wiki for vandalism. Taivo (talk) 19:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior afterwards duplicate of File:Nuvola apps kcmsystem.svg, do made duplicates in background color of transparent images is not in scope of Commons. The uploader made several duplicates of transparent images for a local Wikiquote page. But the big joke is, there is already the same background for this images! So this user seems don't understand what is transparency (or he is doing some workaround of the very outdated IE6, what is not in scope too). But the other big point is that this version is unfortunately completely senseless spreaded through MediaWiki (I've checked all pages, all other icon there are transparent and had nothing related to this background!) -- Perhelion 14:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closed per double nomination -- Perhelion 16:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a derivative work of a professional photo or video still. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:49, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior afterwards duplicate of File:Nuvola apps kword.png -- Perhelion 14:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closed per double nomination -- Perhelion 16:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior afterwards duplicate of File:Nuvola apps krita.png -- Perhelion 14:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closed per double nomination -- Perhelion 16:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A copyrighted image of a character. 87.226.233.158 09:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be taken from a source that doesn't allow commercial use: https://www.flickr.com/photos/wfiupublicradio/8229947044/ Ytoyoda (talk) 04:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong, it is not labeled with that license. The image is available to share (to copy, distribute and transmit the work) and to remix (to adapt the work). Specifically, the work's creator has given it a license of "Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic" and the work is appropriately labeled as such here. This has the correct license attached to it and should not be deleted.--YHoshua (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Attribution-NoCommercial" means it doesn't allow commercial use. You added the incorrect license (and claimed authorship for some reason as well). Ytoyoda (talk) 15:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete False claim of authorship/license/etc. CC BY-NC 2.0 by WFIU Public Radio Indiana Public Media. See COM:L for details. Gunnex (talk) 23:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, per Gunnex. The uncropped version was uploaded to Flickr slightly earlier than this one to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nominator. Unfree license. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Krd 07:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho it may be doubted to be (completely) own work: montage missing links to images used from Wikimedia Commons, please also see p.e. File:AP Montage-jpg.png, Roland zh (talk) 17:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Hi, imho same topic as of [Commons:Deletion requests/File:AP Montage-jpg.png above mentioned DR], kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 17:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo passes COM:TOO. Storkk (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smartphone screenshot showing a crop of this photo. Original source of that photo is unknown to me; it's a photo from WWII. Photographer not given, thus copyright in source country not determinable. Lupo 11:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and blurry to the point of being unusable. Lupo 10:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of smartphone running some night sky app. Provenance of the used imagery is unknown, therefore also the license. Lupo 12:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in 03.2013 by Mussapedia (talk · contributions · Statistics). Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, considering (even in lower res) previously published via (example) http://moai.sudanagri.net/photos/1238255195 (2012) = http://kenanaonline.com/photos/1238255/1238255195/gallery_1238255195.jpg (or Google) Gunnex (talk) 22:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: published here in 2009 Captain-tucker (talk) 09:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata and previously published make {{Own}} work doubtful. Uploader: if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear whether uploader is the subject or the copyright holder. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 17:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://defence.pk/threads/battle-rifle-semi-auto-full-auto-info-bank.229450/ Krd 14:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidentally uploaded it twice Katja Ullrich (WMDE) (talk) 14:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata and watermarked "Patry", while uploader's username is YarasS. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of an official band photo found here. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SiBCI watermark makes {{Own}} unlikely. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a scan of a portion of a modern textbook. If this is indeed freely licensed, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused pure-text PDF of dubious educational value - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:03, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. Out of scope as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Additionally, potential copyright issues surrounding the source of the original photo on the right. Storkk (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, likely a TV screencap. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 17:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I thought the images were already preselected. thanks. --iopensa (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I thought the images were already preselected. thanks. --iopensa (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover - presumably not freely licensed and copyright held either by New Antique Productions (claimed in description to be designers) or Barncott Press, the publisher. Uploader - if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I thought the images were already preselected. thanks. --iopensa (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I thought the images were already preselected. thanks. --iopensa (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I thought the images were already preselected. thanks. --iopensa (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I thought the images were already preselected. thanks. --iopensa (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I thought the images were already preselected. thanks. --iopensa (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. thanks. --iopensa (talk) 15:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I thought the images were already preselected. thanks. --iopensa (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. thanks. --iopensa (talk) 15:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a press photo (microphones in foreground), previously published e.g. here (at bottom), if uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://defence.pk/threads/indian-army-to-upgrade-infantry-weapons-new-assault-rifle.220186/page-5 Krd 14:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 06:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 06:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of metadata and seemingly privileged camera position make uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work doubtful. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not needed 116.200.237.225 05:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:03, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Widely published on the web - uploader if you are the copyright holder, please confirm via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy delete It's quite obvious that the uploader isn't the original owner. It looks like it's been resized and compressed a lot of times while circulating the Internet and the original author's copy would not look like that. Blatantly taken from the Internet with no rights to upload it. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No file is uploaded Msanta20 (talk) 00:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evidently a scan from print (see moiree pattern). Thereby and by this it's hardly own work by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source says all rights reserved: https://www.flickr.com/photos/49415781@N05/6493449921/ Ytoyoda (talk) 04:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per visible moiree pattern obviously a scan from print and thereby likely not own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from a copyright website Lady Lotus (talk) 17:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan or photo of a photo. Uploader, if you are the original photographer, please confirm this through COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused CV - out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Storkk (talk) 17:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Larger version previously published here (3rd image in slideshow). Uploader, if you are the photographer, please confirm this through COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No file is uploaded Msanta20 (talk) 00:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Amitie 10g: Pleas use  Delete or  Keep in deletion requests,   is used by admins. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose... out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose... out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posted in larger size on Feb 2, 2013 as [1] at [2]. Original source unknown; the photo was originally taken at a presentation of the Alfa Romeo Pandion in 2010. Compare the photos here from August 2010: same background (but different photographer). No evidence of free license. Lupo 22:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 09:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused advertising, not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: Uploaded locally at fawiki in 07.2012 by Fatemi127 (and transferred to Commons in 03.2014 by Fatemi127 (talk · contributions · Statistics) the file was previously published via (example) http://forum.1pars.com/threads/195073/ (02.2012, by Behzad) = http://www.soheilnets.com/Radkan%20Tower.JPG (last modified: 2009) = taken from the gallery available at http://www.soheilnets.com/iranad.htm. http://www.soheilnets.com/ is maintained by Soheil Soleimani who says at his main page: "Copying or using pictures or memories in this site for other places or sites is allowed, if you like then you can mention the reference". Unclear if this fullfills {{Attribution}} Gunnex (talk) 06:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Gunnex: Hi dear. thanks for your deletion request. I've uploaded it with low knowledge about copyright and now I accept this deletion. :) thanks so much. H.Fatemi 06:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely copyright violation, see for example this one. Adrian Lang (WMDE) (talk) 10:49, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:31, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 11:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 09:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Unused and not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of 2d artwork not covered by fop in the UK Oxyman (talk) 16:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo. Uploader, if you are the original photographer or know why this would be Public Domain, please confirm via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark credits a "Max Ottoto". Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to unusable low image quality. We have enough good images in Category:Red bell pepper. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover. If the uploader is the copyright holder, the instructions on COM:OTRS should be followed to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 15:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 09:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to unusable low image quality. We have enough good images in Category:Green bell pepper. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to unfocussed low-resolution image. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused pure text pdf - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 18:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Junny95 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 11:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Nullzero (talk) 04:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears on Google and is doubtfully self-created. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amnhacviet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images. See COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:07, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lo1112 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Watermarked www.idealparking.ir, where I can find no mention of a free license.

Storkk (talk) 13:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:28, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melgoo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non free- screenshots, out of scope - promotional image

Leitoxx Work • Talk • Mail 23:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Steinsplitter Captain-tucker (talk) 09:05, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parmanova.ulbolsyn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ohmirain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Image of self is an unused personal image (possibly intended as self-promotion). The icon image doesn't appear to have any general-purpose use (looks intended to be promotional and/or unused personal).

Ubcule (talk) 19:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JuxTZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably (c) vios as all the other uploads of this user.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mursal Akhtar Ansari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These personal photos are all unused and therefore out of scope.

Storkk (talk) 14:03, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Udflc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The USA has no COM:FOP for modern 3D sculptures. Leoboudv (talk) 07:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: No FoP is USA for sculptures Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, replaced by File:BMS-641988.svg. Leyo 13:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 17:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BrightRaven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://i.vimeocdn.com/video/197047958_1280.jpg Krd 06:03, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy  Delete. This is a blatant case of copyvio: higher resolution can be found elsewhere on the internet. BrightRaven (talk) 06:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name AMY (talk) 11:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: redirect installed Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a work by Cesare Giuliani. He is alive. Not de minimis. No FOP in Italy. No permission. BrightRaven (talk) 10:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 02:03, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, replaced by File:Amphetaminil Structural Formulae.png. Leyo 13:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Rhadamante (talk) 22:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 17:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published previously with copyright notice [3]. ELEKHHT 23:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect (see file desc. page) and orphaned. Leyo 13:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 17:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect per file desc. page and orphaned. Leyo 13:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete as original tagger of the mistake. The third structure should be dilithio (the second BuLi deprotonates the α-H). A simple correction would be to draw α-Li (and an explicit α-H in the previous for lay-reader clarity), but I'm not sure the exact structure of that lithium enolate is known (for example, which resonance structure is most representative). The original paper on this test, doi:10.1021/jo00872a047, does not do any analysis of the colored compound. DMacks (talk) 16:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 17:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 13:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: Uploader remove description and licenceing with 12 minutes of upload, so presume they want it deleted. Ww2censor (talk) 11:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Nomination withdrawn The uploader has corrected everything, so it is all ok now. Ww2censor (talk) 14:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn FASTILY 09:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not listed as unrestricted in the IWM website, and is listed as all rights reserved, additional to that the conditions of {{PD-AR-Photo}} are not met in that no date and source of first publication is given. No indication that this image is free either in the UK, US or Argentina and should be deleted as per COM:L and COM:PRP LGA talkedits 21:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No date and source of first publication is given (as required by {{PD-AR-Photo}}). Will be in copyright in Argentina if not published before June 10, 1994 and will be copyright in the US if not published before March 1, 1989. Additionally will be copyright in the US if published between 1978 and February 1989 and the publication contained a copyright notice.
Absent proof of when this was published and if necessary, the proof the publication did not have a copyright notice, this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. LGA talkedits 22:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vikoula5 as Copyvio (copyvio) Krd 15:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All fotos was copied from this site in 2006 http://photos.guelma.org/index.php?rub=region&album=region_03 , the autor is the same --Vikoula5 (talk) 16:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 09:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vikoula5 as Copyvio (copyvio) Krd 15:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All fotos was copied from this site in 2006 http://photos.guelma.org/index.php?rub=region&album=region_03 , the autor is the same --Vikoula5 (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 09:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 11:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No date and source of first publication is given (as required by {{PD-AR-Photo}}). Will be in copyright in Argentina if not published before June 10, 1994 and will be copyright in the US if not published before March 1, 1989. Additionally will be copyright in the US if published between 1978 and February 1989 and the publication contained a copyright notice.
Absent proof of when this was published and if necessary, the proof the publication did not have a copyright notice, this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. LGA talkedits 22:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vikoula5 as Copyvio (copyvio) Krd 15:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All fotos was copied from this site in 2006 http://photos.guelma.org/index.php?rub=region&album=region_03 , the autor is the same --Vikoula5 (talk) 16:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 09:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per Commons:Project scope#Non-allowable reasons for PDF and DjVu formats: The content is essentially raw text. AFBorchert (talk) 20:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 11:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 11:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior afterwards duplicate of File:Nuvola apps klipper.png, do made duplicates in background color of transparent images is not in scope of Commons. The uploader made several duplicates of transparent images for a local Wikiquote page. But there are already the same background for this images. So this user seems don't understand what is transparency or he is probably doing some workaround of the very outdated IE6, what is not in scope too. But the other big point is that this version is unfortunately completely senseless spreaded through MediaWiki (I've checked all pages, all other icon there are transparent and had nothing related to this background!) -- Perhelion 14:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Perhelion, there's no need for your sassy comments. "So this user don't understand what is transparency." Well, as you can see, image was uploaded in 2007. I have uploaded local versions of images with opaque background on Slovene Wikipedia the year before, in September 2006, but these images are now deleted. Take a look at browser statistics for summer 2008 and bare in mind that Internet Explorer 7 was released on October 2006. Internet Explorer 6 doesn't support transparent PNG images and in 2006 nearly half of Slovene internet users used this version of Internet Explorer. So we created PNG images with opaque background to ensure that the main page displayed as intended in all browsers. --Domen (talk) 15:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Dbc334, sorry about that, it's not personally and I've also changed my sentence before your quotation (yes it was a bit overreacted). Ok I was not aware of this high spreading (21% 2008) in the slowenia terytorium (anyway also Microsoft has end his support of this old browser). No offense. -- Perhelion 15:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I will inform Slovene community to replace images with transparent versions (these images are used on main pages, which are protected) and let you know when this is done. Images can then be speedy deleted. --Domen (talk)
Oh thank you, I will remove this sentence also everywhere. -- Perhelion 16:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Images are now replaced with their transparent versions and are not used on any Wikimedia project. They can be speedily deleted. --Domen (talk) 16:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Infringes on the copyright of the game icons .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone please provide a link to the free license for the Android icons? In most cases, icons and logos are not freely licensed even though the software and other related content is free. This is true of Firefox and WMF, among many others. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Jim. Appears to be a derivative of non-free content FASTILY 09:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No date and source of first publication is given (as required by {{PD-AR-Photo}}). Will be in copyright in Argentina if not published before June 10, 1994 and will be copyright in the US if not published before March 1, 1989. Additionally will be copyright in the US if published between 1978 and February 1989 and the publication contained a copyright notice.
Absent proof of when this was published and if necessary, the proof the publication did not have a copyright notice, this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. LGA talkedits 22:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristina o. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only File:NONDUALITY.jpg is clearly marked as a work by John Brevard, but I suspect these 4 images are all pictures of his works. These are nonetheless modern artworks and permission of the author is needed.

BrightRaven (talk) 07:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two pictures are similar to these. BrightRaven (talk) 08:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 09:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A portrait of the uploader? (unused) 91.65.48.42 13:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 09:49, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

claimed "own work", but this is a screencap of a TV program, unlikely uploader is the TV station or has permission from them to release their copyrighted material. DMacks (talk) 15:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder 91.65.48.42 12:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover, no indication that this cover artwork is freely licensed. This (or another album cover image with this name) was previously deleted a few times over the past few years, but never through a DR... hoping for consensus so that CSD#G4 applies in future. Storkk (talk) 10:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

claimed "own work", but this is a screencap of a TV program, unlikely uploader is the TV station or has permission from them to release their copyrighted material. DMacks (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Preiously published, no evidence of permission - see also en:File:File-Derek Brueckner at Vermont Studio Center Aug 2010 DSC02607.jpg and en:File:Photo taken of me (Derek Brueckner).jpg - both tagged for deletion  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 14:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image is blurry Thiotrix (talk) 19:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: still acceptable and obviously within scope Morning (talk) 13:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm new here, and made mistake with the size of the gif to get an animated preview Daformat (talk) 17:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph of a (presumably) copyrighted photograph. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smells of copyvio. Quite how it came to be categorised as a train I don't know though. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, looks like a screencap - uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 10:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio - original uploader (Reneemunez33) also contributed File:Teresa Ruiz.jpeg which is a copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims. Based solely on the username, the uploader might be the subject of the photo, but the photo does not appear to be a self-portrait, so it's unlikely that the uploader is the author. Additionally, the file appears to have been uploaded solely for use in the self-promotional article Dr.Lokeswara Rao on the English Wikipedia project, which has been deleted for lacking references demonstrating encyclopædic notability, so it would seem not to be realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 19:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to File:Sajjalokeswarao.PNG. LX (talk, contribs) 19:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm new here, and made mistake with the size of the gif to get an animated preview Daformat (talk) 17:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no author, no source 91.65.48.42 13:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque essa imagem não é minha Leticia Arantes Silveira (talk) 00:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Morning (talk) 13:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Argentina LGA talkedits 21:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 14:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation - http://www.speakers.ca/2013/03/talk-the-walk/ predates this upload Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Argentina LGA talkedits 21:26, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Morning (talk) 14:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio - original uploader (Reneemunez33) also contributed File:Teresa Ruiz.jpeg which is a copyvio (I'm the immediate uploader here but realized this issue after uploading) Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 15:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo. Woodcutterty (talk) 15:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#Japan for modern 3D artwork in Japan. Vantey (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 14:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated source is a Google image search. I cannot find the original, but it is unlikely to be freely licensed, and certainly not {{PD-ineligible}}. Storkk (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a book cover that passes the threshold of originality. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 15:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for any article; uploaded for vandalism purposes. discospinster (talk) 20:46, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture Pascal Coupot is still alive. No Freedom of panorama in FRance 2A01:E35:8A5E:9810:8427:924B:6A42:D7AE 19:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation -- uploaded a month or so earlier at https://web.archive.org/web/20130630064749/http://revista-iman.com/ Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious own work, but i can't find a definitive source that predates this upload. user's only contribution, no metadata, low resultion, fairly good angle at an awards show (?) to not be a press photo Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader is not the author 91.65.48.42 10:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quaility picture of unknown speaker. Other pictures in same suite are better and may be kept. Mippzon (talk) 06:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Morning (talk) 13:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio - originally uploaded at w:File:Nuestrashijas.jpg by Reneemunez33, who has contributed one confirmed copyvio at en.wiki (File:A10n1esp-1.jpg) and one additional copyvio here (see above) Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded with unintended name - will re-upload with intended filename ModWilson (talk) 15:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The model would be copyrighted, hence needs to be deleted as a COM:DW. russavia (talk) 06:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 14:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, value of image is lost. Mippzon (talk) 12:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious own work -- publicity photo with no OTRS confirmation, user's only upload (but it is high resolution and has metadata....) Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded locally at fawiki in 11.2007 by Samanwiki the file (no exif, transferred to Commons in 2008) is a cropped version (watermark removed) of previously published via http://www.azaval.com/showthread.php?11823-IRAN-and-its-PEOPLE-BIG-PICTURE-THREAD (10.2007, by ghalibaf) = http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s19/basiji_2007/IMG_0358.jpg (last modified: 10.2007, exif available). Gunnex (talk) 20:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imho, the contre-jour makes it difficult to use for an educational purpose. Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 06:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 14:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, and it is unlikely that the architects/designers (Pollack and Ploquin) have been dead for 70 years, as it was build only 80 years ago. Additionally, the parts pictured may be an even later addition, possibly for the 1998 World Cup. Storkk (talk) 12:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of 2d artwork not covered by fop in the UK Oxyman (talk) 16:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Morning (talk) 14:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown audience, not providing any value to commons. Mippzon (talk) 06:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Morning (talk) 13:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque essa imagem não é minha Leticia Arantes Silveira (talk) 00:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of panorama in France 2A01:E35:8A5E:9810:8427:924B:6A42:D7AE 19:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 14:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the creator of this file. It is obsolete and has been replaced by a png. The only use is on my own user page. Constant314 (talk) 00:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't found a PNG image like this, the only one is this File:Magnetic Vector Potential Circular Toroid.png!? -- Perhelion 06:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That is the replacement file. The png is not an exact copy and does not have the same name. Constant314 (talk) 22:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request Morning (talk) 14:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a duplicate of this picture I've uploaded on May 25, 2013 at 06:19 and I forget I did it. Thanks for deletion. Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 20:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free music (Nirvana) kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? It's not a complete song, it's just a riff with a few notes I play. Beachcomber (talk) 16:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
According to Commons:Licensing, partition has to be under free license, and it seems to me that Commons does not accept extracts, even if they are performed by users. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 16:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very, very poor copy of the image, and we have an immensely better copy. Poor enough that I can see no value in keeping it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 14:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already published at [4], and conditions mentioned in EXIF are incompatible with a free license. Lupo 17:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -76.24.24.70 16:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC) Chad has requested this that photo please be removed, another photo may be used in its place[reply]


Kept: CC license can't be revoked Morning (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be an overcompressed crop of a professional photo, but I can't find an original source. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 14:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mrmurin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I doubt these pictures are own work: they look like profesionnal studio pictures and they can be found elsewhere on the internet (but I could not find higher resolution or images older than the upload). The uploader committed other copyvios.

BrightRaven (talk) 05:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 14:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, no metadata and name banner makes it appear to be a TV screencap. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work: Photo of Assad almost certainly not freely licensed. Storkk (talk) 10:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Morning (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 62.21.51.128 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.dan-poltherm.pl/pl/strona_glownarealizacje/hotele_i_biurowce.html Krd 13:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To jest zdjęcie tablicy informacyjnej umieszczonej podczas budowy obiektu, ponadto trochę przeze mnie retuszowane w dolnej części. Samo przycięcie zdjęcia w taki sposób, iż jest widoczna tylko treść na tablicy nie powoduje, iż moje zdjęcie jest chronione prawem autorskim osoby trzeciej. Poznaniak (dyskusja) 18:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Drawing on board is not your own work. So, photo/scan of board, isn't your own work; it is only other kind of reproduction someone else's work. By default, youcan't upload someone else's work. See: Licensing: "For example, the following are generally not allowed: Scans or reproductive photographs of copyrighted artwork, especially book covers, album/CD covers, etc." and "The photographer has rights to the image, if it is not a plain reproduction of the original."
Rysunek na tablicy nie jest Twoją pracą. Zdjęcie/skan tablicy także nie jest twoją pracą twórczą; jest to tylko inny sposób prezentacji czyjejś pracy. Zobacz stronę: Licensing: "W szczególności, zazwyczaj niedopuszczalne są: skany lub fotografie przedstawiające dzieła objęte prawem autorskim, zwłaszcza okładki książek, albumów, płyt muzycznych, itp." oraz "Fotograf ma wszelkie prawa do zdjęcia, o ile nie jest to oczywista reprodukcja oryginału.". 62.21.51.128 20:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While interesting, this image is composed of thousands of personal images submitted to NASA for this purpose. While an argument could be made that those images are de minimis, I believe that since virtually every component of this image is copyrighted, it would fail de minimis. Huntster (t @ c) 12:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with this - may be right about this - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 14:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I disagree. Each image is around six pixels on a side, so you can't see anything of the original images except color. The only creative work that remains here is NASA's and that is PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A corrected version of this image is available (File:Our Project Poster II.png), where two typos have been fixed. Thus either this file should be deleted or it should become an old version of File:Our Project Poster II.png if this is possible. Torsch (talk) 08:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Both are out of scope. Commons does not keep images combined with text -- those should be created by typesetting as needed. Also, this is "our project". If there are multiple contributors then "own work" does not apply and this is a copyright violation. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an iconic photo (see this article, or this book cover neither of which seem to credit the photographer) of Tom Barry - it was taken in 1920, and therefore is almost certainly not {{Own}} work of uploader. It is, however, probably {{PD-1923}}, however as it was created in Ireland, it needs to be established that it is public domain in the EU. It might be {{PD-EU-Anonymous}} (nobody that I have found credits the photographer), or it could be {{PD-70}}, however it may be possible to establish who the photographer was, and that photographer may not have died before 1944. It would be great if we could keep this image, and I am hoping we get community consensus that {{PD-EU-Anonymous}} is a safe bet. Storkk (talk) 15:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment - if kept, it should be {{Rename}}d to something like File:Tom Barry, Commander of the Third West Cork Flying Column at an IRA training camp in 1920.jpg under criterion 2. Storkk (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - I have emailed:
In the hope that someone might know something. Storkk (talk) 16:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: In order to use {{PD-EU-Anonymous}}, someone must prove that the photographer actually chose to be anonymous, not simply that we do not know his name. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parce que cette photo me rend malade ! Je me trouve affreusement moche. Je compte sur vous. Merci. Lesliebbb (talk) 09:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Je vous ai déjà répondu, me semble-t-il... Proposez-nous une autre photo libre de droits et nous remplacerons celle-ci. Bien à vous, Ji-Elle (talk) 20:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Give us a better image and we may -- no promises -- delete this one. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be the cover of an LP, probably published in the 1960s. Not clear how this is Public Domain (and certainly not {{PD-US}}) Storkk (talk) 12:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old slide, mediocre quality, new digital image is File:(1)Cowper_Rose_Randwick_Sydney.jpg Sardaka (talk) 08:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I'm not sure which I prefer. THe sujbect image shows the diamond leading in the windows which cannot be seen in the new image. The new image shows the utility wires much more prominently. THe front door is not visible in the new image..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:26, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Argentina LGA talkedits 21:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No date and source of first publication is given (as required by {{PD-AR-Photo}}). Will be in copyright in Argentina if not published before June 1, 1994 and will be copyright in the US if not published before March 1, 1989. Additionally will be copyright in the US if published between 1978 and February 1989 and the publication contained a copyright notice.
Absent proof of when this was published and if necessary, the proof the publication did not have a copyright notice, this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. LGA talkedits 21:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image comes from the Argentina's state radio (Radio y Televisión Argentina). There are several files from there. Appear under CC-BY-SA-2.5-AR. [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] In this case, can it be applied? --Gastón Cuello (talk) 02:07, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly, but I am not seeing any proof that Radio y Televisión Argentina does indeed licence content CC-BY-SA-2.5-AR, none of the files you have linked to have links to a web page that shows such a licence and if you visit http://www.radionacional.com.ar/ there is a clear copyright statement on the page. LGA talkedits 02:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok.--Gastón Cuello (talk) 12:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader does not seem to be the author of the drawing. This picture was probably taken in Nepal, where there is no FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 06:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old slide, better digital image is File:(1)Cowper_Rose_Randwick_Sydney.jpg Sardaka (talk) 08:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purports to be a picture of Boo an Internet-sensation dog "from his owner", but is, in fact, a picture of a stuffed animal Beyond My Ken (talk) 11:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Huntster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Unfortunately, while posted to a NASA website, NASA is not credited at the source. This indicates that image was not created under NASA contract, and is therefore not public domain. Krd 13:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem of course - however, is it possible the image is ok after all? => on the basis that the image may have been "prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code" - via => w:Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (associated with the w:Smithsonian Institution) - in any regards - enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 14:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Smithsonian Institution employs a mix of government and private employees (and far more of the latter). The general rule of thumb is that unless a Smithsonian image is explicitly stated as having no copyright we assume it does. In this case it is further watered down since this is a joint venture between Harvard University and the Smithsonian. Huntster (t @ c) 22:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Huntster - Thank you for your comments - I understand - no problem whatsoever - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 11:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: David Aguilar, the artist, is a HARvard-Smithsonian Center employee. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Martin Hurlimann died in 1984 Gunduu (talk) 13:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the text doesnt seem to be free or trivial. BaseSat (talk) 19:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the text doesnt seem to be free or trivial. BaseSat (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in Ukraine. --BaseSat (talk) 19:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And who is author of this sculpture?--Anatoliy (talk) 18:36, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Probably uk:Костянтин Скритуцький --BaseSat (talk) 19:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG file at File:Flag of Libya (1977-2011).svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The colors of these files look completely different. Why exactly should this be deleted? Note that files are no longer deleted automatically just because they have an SVG version available. Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's right we don't normally delete files because just because there's a better SVG around, but we do delete them when there is a pre-existing superior SVG and the inferior image has no important differences to warrant it staying or which would give it a potential of use. Fry1989 eh? 23:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 21:34, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Include material from a copyrighted sound recording, either remove that or replace it with File:National Banner Song.ogg, which is a free equivalent TheChampionMan1234 (talk) 01:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 21:34, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have this flag in SVG format. Fry1989 eh? 20:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:33, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is in copyright and not in public domain. The image may be uploaded in English Wikipedia. Amartyabag (talk) 04:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inaccurate and out of date Flags (talk) 04:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 16:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Qizilbash123 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: While labeled "unknown", copyright holder is Nameh News and it can be checked from footer marks (cropped out by uploader). Original date isn't mentioned but published date is 1392 (2013). This case is another example of copyright violation among dozens (as can be see from his talkpage). |source= http://www.rouzegareno.ir/files/fa/news/1392/8/15/100837_554.jpg Krd 06:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The user Qizilbash123 has personal problem with this image. He has deleted it from all of the articles. This is a picture who shows a demonstration against mandatory Hejab.
You can read his dogmatic thoughts here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:My_Stealthy_Freedom

The photo has been taken in Iran and because it's so old, according to this label, we can use it here.
{{PD-Iran}}
There are thousands of these kinds of photos (Whit the same label) in WikiCommons.Soroush90gh (talk) 07:21, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any "personal problem" and I didn't remove it from anywhere except from basic article with explanation because you force it for political agenda. Problem here lies that you upload many photos without knowing or refering proper author. --Qizilbash123 (talk) 08:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: missing evidence of permission FASTILY 07:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in good faith, but there's no valid UK tag. To be classed as anonymous, the file needs evidence to show what reasonable steps have been taken to determine the creator of the image. (See Commons:Anonymous works for more background on this, or Template:PD-UK-unknown for the relevant tag) Hchc2009 (talk) 12:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 07:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]