Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/04/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 24th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error no coloque la categoria Jarelis (talk) 00:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: accidental DR for a DR JuTa 19:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pretty shure that this is a copyright violation 178.2.58.255 19:06, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: yes i.e.from http://adsoftheworld.com/media/outdoor/perry_ellis_fall_2013_2 JuTa 19:36, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FJT63ER3R UMP 41.137.74.94 17:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense nomination. JurgenNL (talk) 14:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already exists File:CencosudPE.png, this file is outdated. Conoce una nueva forma de ahorrar (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nomination done by a sockpuppet of Geógrafo23. Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not convinced that the projection here satisfies de minimis criteria. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the problem is the image displayed on the screen, it is also mine, so copyrights are not violated.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The copyright to the picture visible on the screen is also copyrighted by Jacek Halicki, so there's no reason to delete this file. odder (talk) 11:38, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SS: Common proprietary web browsers include Microsoft Internet Explorer, Safari and Opera. Screenshots of these are never permissible on Commons if they show the browser's user interface.    FDMS  4    13:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just crop the image and the problem is solved :-) --MGA73 (talk) 17:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, because 1) the copyvio would still be in the upload version history and 2) the image might become useless for the id.WIKT entry then.    FDMS  4    17:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I didn't notice you were the uploader of the screenshot. Of course, one of of us could just crop it and you could then hide the old version. Please either do it yourself or tell me which parts exactly to keep.    FDMS  4    19:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry too I was just a bit grumpy that day. ;-) Generally I think we should not delete images in use if we can fix the problem by cropping the image.
I do not speak the language on id.wikt but using google translate i think the text "bincang" just means "discussion". So I think the purpose of the image is to illustrate the "Discussion" tab on Wikipedia. So if we crop away the top then the image is still usable. If it.wikt want they can always replace the image with a better one if they do not like the crop.
I will have a look at it tonight or in the weekend. --MGA73 (talk) 08:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Yes, thanks. [non-admin closure] FDMS4 20:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: No real use for a picture of a fish upside down Mbch331 (talk) 16:33, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would say it's actually a pretty good and detailed picture of the species, something the Dutch entry did not have before.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jschop (talk • contribs)

 Oppose It's actually best photo of this species here, and it will be rotated so it will not be upside-down. --Smooth_O (talk) 07:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Didym (talk) 00:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only file. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:51, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; unused image of unknown person. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Revicomplaint? 04:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low educational value in this unused personal photo by a user whose only edit on Commons was to upload this photo. They also have 7 edits on en-wiki, incuding 5 to the userpage/biography. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 23:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Also source website says "Copyright © 2000 [the-south-asian.com]. Intellectual Property. All rights reserved.". The duplicate file File:Air Marshal of Indian Air Force Arjan Singh.jpg needs also be taken care. Sreejith K (talk) 04:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: both Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality PDF containing one sentence of text about a non-notable person. Dsprc (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google maps or equivalent? Themightyquill (talk) 09:49, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Steinsplitter Revicomplaint? 04:03, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, merely personal shot. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 01:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bunnyquantum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused photos of musical group of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:51, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aze0098 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I'd like to see some evidence that the files are published under a free licence as claimed. The source page carries a notice that suggests the opposite: "Copyright @China Military Online. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited."

The same goes for File:Admiral Dawson.jpg: the source also carries a copyright notice.

Underlying lk (talk) 22:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 04:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grupo03a4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused images of non-notable people - most are blurry

INeverCry 20:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. rubin16 (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luismeb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nany emelda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images simply taken from the Internet.

Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: simply copright violatuons JuTa 19:30, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photograph of a table of text. If the information in this photo were needed, using text would be better. Ed (Edgar181) 13:20, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also proposing deletion of these additional files from the same uploader, with the same rationale. They are just unused photographs of text. Ed (Edgar181) 13:24, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 22:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source given "ergotron.com" says all images are copyrighted so the cc-license is not credible. Avron (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:55, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 20:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 07:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An artwork by an anonymous, for the book he did not write yet. Eddau (talk) 17:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 07:27, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:59, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file by mistake, as my works are not for Creative common license, they are copyrighted and for this I want to delete this to protect the work. LMT92 (talk) 23:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see COM:DW. Yann (talk) 07:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Discover on another web page. Problems with approval of the work, therefore deletion necessary. JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 12:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user trying to revoke license with absurd arguments Denniss (talk) 06:41, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file by mistake, as my works are not for Creative common license, they are copyrighted and for this I want to delete this to protect the work. LMT92 (talk) 23:33, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see COM:DW. Yann (talk) 07:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisemement GrapedApe (talk) 11:27, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused private signature. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Could be replaced with wiki markup and SVGs. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falta el Y 190.189.21.81 12:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. It's from a female with en:Turner syndrome. If Y wasn't missing it wouldn't even be from a female.
This deletion proposal is nonsense and should be closed as speedy-kept.--Pere prlpz (talk) 14:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Agreed. --LydiaPintscher (talk) 10:10, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file by mistake, as my works are not for Creative common license, they are copyrighted and for this I want to delete this to protect the work. LMT92 (talk) 23:33, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see COM:DW. Yann (talk) 07:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 08:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement GrapedApe (talk) 11:29, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement of a service Aloneinthewild (talk) 21:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 07:25, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Santos Yubero died in 1994 (see here). Therefore, this picture is not in the public domain  Discasto 17:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree, the copyright hasn't expired yet. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 07:29, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement GrapedApe (talk) 11:29, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement GrapedApe (talk) 11:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to be a photograph of a broadcast on a television screen (other than the image quality, there are reflections off the TV screen and is a "4" watermark in the upper right). As a screenshot of a likely copywritten broadcast, the image cannot be published by the uploader under CC-BY-SA-3.0. Ahecht (talk) 15:27, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Steinsplitter. Yann (talk) 07:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement GrapedApe (talk) 11:29, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gustave Alaux (1887-1965) is not in public domain. Copyright violation. 83.204.245.62 20:52, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 07:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya no es necesaria, no hay ligas a él. McOil (talk) 06:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Ellin Beltz. Yann (talk) 06:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:09, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not free, is work of Getty Images (see caption underneath photo here: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/11/04/joe-torre-tony-la-russa-bobby-cox-on-hall-of-fame-ballot/) Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 16:01, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 07:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is an advertisement with little informative value. Sanyambahga (talk) 07:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source given "ergotron.com" says all images are copyrighted so the cc-license is not credible. Avron (talk) 09:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:55, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is taken in 1947 (see source) and therefore it's not in public domain. Smooth_O (talk) 13:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is because it is "a photograph or a work of applied art published before January 1, 1966" - as per Template:PD-Yugoslavia. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file by mistake, as my works are not for Creative common license, they are copyrighted and for this I want to delete this to protect the work. LMT92 (talk) 23:33, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see COM:DW. Yann (talk) 07:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I ask the community here to decide if the Google name could be trademarked/copyrighted? Leoboudv (talk) 01:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete IMHO this is beyond the threshold of originality. Lymantria (talk) 11:19, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment the actual image is CC-BY-SA-2.0 so that's fine, but I'm not sure about the trademark side of this. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:31, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Lewis Hulbert. Yann (talk) 06:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't see in the Flickr account recorded as source that said account is the owner of the righst of this photograph. In fact, no source información is provided  Discasto 17:34, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see COM:DW. Yann (talk) 07:13, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Petición del propietario del vehículo. -- MARC912374, 17:51 24 April 2014 (UTC)


Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 07:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Discover on another web page. Problems with approval of the work, therefore deletion necessary. JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 12:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user trying to revoke license with absurd arguments Denniss (talk) 06:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Petición del propietario del vehículo. -- MARC912374, 17:36 24 April 2014 (UTC)


Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 07:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is probably http://es.futurama.wikia.com/wiki/Archivo:Mario_castañeda.jpg, which says nothing about licensing. Even if it did it still wouldn't be unlikely that this was a copyvio by a Wikia user (or the community).    FDMS  4    12:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMO inappropriate shot, as there is no evidence of consent by the depicted person, thereby a violation of personality rigths. As we have another shot of the same person, we can easily go without this one. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Not a public place, not used. Yann (talk) 06:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement GrapedApe (talk) 11:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; probably an advertise Ciaurlec (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:04, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement GrapedApe (talk) 11:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:59, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Petición del propietario del vehículo. -- MARC912374, 17:41 24 April 2014 (UTC)


Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 07:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Patently a scan from a newspaper, totally unsourced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by G.dallorto (talk • contribs) 2014-04-23T00:04:06‎ (UTC)


Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 07:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV Cap, uploader is definitely not the creator Odeesi (talk) 09:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:55, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisement GrapedApe (talk) 11:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; source is labeled "google.es", uploader states author is unknown Dsprc (talk) 20:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Steinsplitter. Yann (talk) 07:14, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unknown person, nonsense description. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:55, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubt about authorship of uploader, due to the watermark in the middle of the image. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Discover on another web page. Problems with approval of the work, therefore deletion necessary. JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 12:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user trying to revoke license with absurd arguments Denniss (talk) 06:41, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 08:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not in use personal picture Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Discover on another web page. Problems with approval of the work, therefore deletion necessary. JohannesErwinEugen.R (talk) 12:08, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: user trying to revoke license with absurd arguments Denniss (talk) 06:41, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement - The image is a clipping from a Newspaper. Sanyambahga (talk) 07:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of nonnotable person, outside project scope; see Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Sayed mohamad bagher posaei TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 07:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asfjazz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:10, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Petición del propietario del vehículo. --MARC912374 (talk) 17:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)


Deleted: as per above. Yann (talk) 07:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SepulvedaElite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logo, probably a test of the Wikipedia mobile beta.

   FDMS  4    12:58, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvios or out of project scope images.

Jespinos (talk) 23:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 03:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - this image is an ebay picture download easy to identify by the camera icon bottom right corner. --Maxxl2 - talk 18:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An identical picture is displayed since 2010 at this blog with same size and camera icon to. So doubt the ownership. --Maxxl2 - talk 19:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Gabriele Baffa Trasci died in 1816 so this protrait is *maybe* in the public domain but Rolandodeynigo didn't give details and is now gone. I search for more infos but I didn't find anything. VIGNERON (talk) 11:59, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo mal subido Pablo 6213 (talk) 02:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because nominator is also uploader and has requested deletion within seven days of uploading. Green Giant (talk) 23:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:26, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error no coloque la categoria Jarelis (talk) 00:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because nominator is also uploader and has requested deletion within seven days of uploading. Green Giant (talk) 22:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:24, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error no coloque la categoria Jarelis (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because nominator is also uploader and has requested deletion within seven days of uploading. Green Giant (talk) 22:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error no coloque la categoria Jarelis (talk) 00:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because nominator is also uploader and has requested deletion within seven days of uploading. Green Giant (talk) 22:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:23, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error no coloque la categoria Jarelis (talk) 00:33, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because nominator is also uploader and has requested deletion within seven days of uploading. Green Giant (talk) 23:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error no coloque la categoria Jarelis (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No coloque la categoria Jarelis (talk) 14:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because nominator is also uploader and has requested deletion within seven days of uploading. Green Giant (talk) 22:54, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible COM:COPYVIO, this image appears in a John Deere promotional piece (in a smaller size) but which implies that the original belongs to the company not to this uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:02, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its resolution is really low (186 × 140 pixels). This renders the image useless for any illustrative, educational purpose. Fitoschido (talk) 06:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arzino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After today identifying +30 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different Panoramio/Flickr accounts, Google Street View, blogs, forums, touristic sites etc., details at User talk:Arzino) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. Obs.: Google Street View images mostly faked with exif "Frederico". Presuming that actual uploads (since 2013) taken with exif iPhone 4S and Canon EOS 1100 D are own work. The rest most likely grabbed from Internet. Spezial case: File:Quirrarange.jpg (map, unlikely own work).

Gunnex (talk) 22:34, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 10:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screencap from a British film it may not be public domain 69.124.39.237 04:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if it a British film then its not public domain it would still be copyrighted in the UK. Dman41689 (talk) 05:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because this is from a British film released only 55 years ago. This image cannot be uploaded locally to Wikipedia because the actor is still alive. Green Giant (talk) 23:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion Krd 17:37, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya existe una versión actualizada NDRV2090 (talk) 22:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because the nominator is the uploader but also because this file was only recently deleted - see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by NDRV2090 from April 2014. Green Giant (talk) 10:28, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sozib mia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 11:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ページに使用しないため — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ringo159 (talk • contribs) 2014-04-24T07:50:32‎ (UTC)

 Delete per uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 10:52, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested, unused, recent (as of request) whym (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

同じファイルが複数あるため — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ringo159 (talk • contribs) 2014-04-24T07:47:26‎ (UTC)

 Delete per uploader request. Green Giant (talk) 10:52, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested, unused, recent (as of request) whym (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: the file is a cropped version of the film poster, available e.g. here: page (in Russian), direct link to the file DmitTrix (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Steinsplitter Captain-tucker (talk) 11:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, just derivative of a photo on a headstone. Sealle (talk) 16:52, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. There's no evidence that the photo and its derivatives may be published under free license. Also FoP is not applicable. Niklem (talk) 18:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

one source image deleted, a further one without proper source Denniss (talk) 06:29, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France : non free, the author is Mickaël MOING (see http://www.couteaux-moing.com/sculptures/couteaux_sculptures.htm) Ancalagon (talk) 14:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same photo, though in lower resolution, found in this article from 2011. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable COM:COPYVIO: Image from here, older than this upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free sculpture. Eleassar (t/p) 07:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well there is a CC license, but this is not own work of the uploader as claimed but likely a drawing, print or similar from1882. It might be i.e. {{PD-old}} ut we would need to know the real source and author. JuTa 19:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality; impossible to find the exact location Ciaurlec (talk) 16:58, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not see any donation ticket of the imagine from the Consorzio di tutela del Limone di Siracusa... — Preceding unsigned comment added by G.dallorto (talk • contribs) 2014-04-22T23:21:54‎ (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to a discussion at COM:Graphic Lab/Map workshop, this map is geopolitically incorrect, is not linked to any articles, and has been superseded by a correct one. Nominating for deletion for not having false information lying around. Nelg (talk) 20:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erm … there is a huge facebook screenshot on slide 3, is it CC BY-SA 3.0? Maybe transfer it back to outreach.wikimedia.org if it hosts non-free media …    FDMS  4    13:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-Art}}-fail (70 pma), considering artwork attributed to painter from the Netherlands Marianne van der Heijden (1922—1998). Copyrighted till the end of 2068. Gunnex (talk) 23:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible COM:COPYVIO, image found [here, from John Deere corporation Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Infringement of copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahdiz (talk • contribs) 2014-04-23T14:43:39‎ (UTC)

 Delete per COM:EDUSE#Examples - artwork created by the uploader without obvious educational use. Green Giant (talk) 03:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality; impossible to find the exact location Ciaurlec (talk) 16:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, better images yet disposables Ciaurlec (talk) 13:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a single author is named (violates at least two images with attribution requirement) + one image is missing Denniss (talk) 06:24, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image claims to be public domain, and cites http://www.gty.org/connect/presskit. But there's nothing there, or in the copyright notice info http://www.gty.org/connect/copyright to support that. This is part of a press kit, which they allow restricted use of, but not free use. Rob (talk) 16:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo of 1987 Summer Universiade
Converted by me to DR to allow for a bit of discussion, as this image is on Commons since 2010. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible COM:COPYVIO, smaller version found in John Deere company slide show here. Suggest OTRS by photographer for this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I find that the lack of infomation and lack of Metadata with the fact that this http://voices.yahoo.com/image/1449180/index.html?cat=40 has bigger dimensions that this "original image", as other images this user has uploaded have been deleted that this is likely a false claim to ownership Lady Lotus (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation of Visual identity guidelines --Maxxl2 - talk 16:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 06:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because although COM:SCOPE allows users to upload a small number of personal photos "of themselves", for use in user pages on other projects, this image does not fit these criteria, unless the user is a text-based lifeform. Green Giant (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:55, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 06:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because although COM:SCOPE allows users to upload a small number of personal photos "of themselves", for use in user pages on other projects, this image does not fit these criteria, unless the user is a text-based lifeform. Green Giant (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 19:55, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither Brazilian nor old: the organization as founded 2005. Beyond: no text5logo, nor simple shapes. OAlexander (talk) 03:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because this is above the threshold of originality and it is unused. Green Giant (talk) 17:26, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 19:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this picture. It is a drawing, anyone can draw, and it was drew by an anonymous. Eddau (talk) 18:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:EDUSE#Examples - artwork created by the uploader without obvious educational use. Green Giant (talk) 03:26, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:28, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo scorretto, sostituito da quello corretto (File:Logo Metropolitane Italia.svg) Friedrichstrasse (talk) 17:01, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Captain-tucker (talk) 10:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Practically unusable version / replaced with File:Breda Rio.png. OAlexander (talk) 05:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because this unused image is effectively a scaled down version of the PNG, which is being used in an article. Green Giant (talk) 17:38, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:20, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived from a photo that has since been deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dreiros HaeB (talk) 08:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because it is derived from a deleted image. Green Giant (talk) 01:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superior rendition at File:TV3 logo.png. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Captain-tucker (talk) 10:48, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No date and authorship nor source given. The uploader writes "unknown author". — Preceding unsigned comment added by G.dallorto (talk • contribs) 2014-04-23T00:51:10‎ (UTC)

Hi, i am sorry for it, but i don't know the name of author and her date. The photo is very ancient because it has some elements verifiable in the image, comparing it with a same photo of statue of Prometeo recent: [1]
Today there are in the place of photo the very tall trees and before they didn't exist in this photo!
Sorry but this is what i can tell you respect the photo. If you must delete her, you can proceed. --Mikystar (talk) 19:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You ought not "assume" the date, you should simply document it. It is that simple. By means of a simple search with Google, rather than by getting mad with the trees, author comes out as a Biagio Poidimani, born in 1910 and dead in 2010. We therefore still need to wait for a mere 66 years before his work falls into the public domain, sorry... --User:G.dallorto (talk) 20:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, i understand, thanks for the explanation. --Mikystar (talk) 20:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator - image is still under copyright. Green Giant (talk) 03:34, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:28, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho 'advertisements', p.e. as well as File:LAY Logo HitMill EQ Grau.svg only contributions by uploader, not in use, imho out of scope, Roland zh (talk) 17:49, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello. This may absolutely be deleted. I'm new at Wikipedia and still getting used to it at the Wikipedia:Spielwiese. But if possible, please don't delete File:LAY Logo HitMill EQ Grau.svg. It's for a well known music studio in Zürich that I like very much. It's owner Roman Camenzind has his own article but he has an entire team behind him. Imho they should get some credit as well. Tobedog (talk) 14:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC/GMT +2)


Deleted: Captain-tucker (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated Msanta20 (talk) 08:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file: File:Old City Na'in Iran.jpg Msanta20 (talk) 02:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because they are duplicates of the same photo by the same photographer. Commons should host only one exact copy of an image. In future please use {{duplicate}}. Green Giant (talk) 01:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:22, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho 'advertisements', p.e. as well as File:HitMill Logo 600x150.png only contributions by uploader, not in use, imho out of scope, Roland zh (talk) 17:48, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use Captain-tucker (talk) 12:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted, official company logo GrapedApe (talk) 11:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because this is far above any threshold of originality. If the uploaded wishes to use this logo on the EN-WP article then they could upload it locally in a reduced size, if they can ensure that it meets all ten w:WP:NFCC criteria. Green Giant (talk) 02:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This should have been marked as a {{Copyvio}}, blatant infringment. - Fma12 (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: .. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GODSBiology (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antoniojcordero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are currently available on Panoramio under the license all rights reserved. Despite of having the same username, the Panoramio user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. The user uploaded also copyrighted images from other Panoramio and Flickr accounts.


Gunnex (talk) 07:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superior rendition at File:TV3 logo.png. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Captain-tucker (talk) 10:47, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Substituted by a svg version (File:Logo Metropolitane Italia.svg) Friedrichstrasse (talk) 15:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Still in use Natuur12 (talk) 13:45, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sostituita dal file in versione svg (File:Logo Metropolitane Italia.svg) Friedrichstrasse (talk) 16:52, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Request of author, more suitable version available. -- Perhelion (talk) 14:43, 26 April 2014 (UTC) Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 11:15, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Svg version existing, color is wrong Bruce The Deus (talk) 18:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 02:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I personally took this photo and uploaded it postmortem to be used on his wiki page at his family's request. I have full rights and permission to use the photo and image of Mr Earwood. ---- Kylepatrick68 (talk) 05:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC) kyle Patrick (kylepatrick68)[reply]

Delete we need proper documentation for us to use this image. Dman41689 (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 10:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 20:48, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator - copyright violation. Green Giant (talk) 03:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 09:28, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Look at the right-down corner. I suspect 'Just taken from the Internet' Itu (talk) 21:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Itu (talk) 23:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Gipsei (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This image is very spreaded in the Internet (with umpteen different signatures etc.). Here is the oldest source what I can find with Google:[5] from Friday, 10. März 2000. “On this web page you will find a range of high quality wallpapers. All of them are available for instant download, and what's more, all of them are copyright free.[6] All upscaled or other variants are from this version (you can see this on the jpg artefacts from the very high compressed original, 39%). -- Perhelion (talk) 04:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for that nice inestigation. Probably we should upload this file from its source and then replace Flowers_247.jpg .--Itu (talk) 10:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Perhelion. Green Giant (talk) 10:44, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Captain-tucker (talk) 20:37, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to be almost a duplicate of File:P1060171 - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg, which is slightly clearer, the two fuzzy people are further away and the soldiers are slightly more visible. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 22:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 00:22, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a slightly smaller and fuzzier version of File:Tuấn Bún Chả tết 2014.JPG which at least shows some of these things clearly. Low educational value per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 22:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 20:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be fuzzy and out of focus compared to the very similar File:Tuấn Bún Chả hoa.JPG. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 22:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 20:44, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a fuzzier version of File:Tuấn Bún Chả xuân.JPG, taken at a very, very slightly different angle. Low educational value per COM:EDUSE. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 22:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope Captain-tucker (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence of this having been legitimately published (I conducted a basic search, and only threw up duplicates of this image). The original web page gives no more details. With no author information either, and only a creation date, I believe that this counts as an "anonymous, unpublished" work in the US, which is still under copyright until 1933 + 120 years, i.e. 2053. Hchc2009 (talk) 07:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Except that if it was published in China, copyright expiry would be date of publication + 50 years = c. 1983. I'm not sure where that puts its status on Commons. Philg88 (talk) 07:43, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Without a publication date or location, it's a difficult one. At the moment all we've got is a creation date. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 11:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FUSILIO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonnotable characters outside of the project scope of Wikimedia Commons; File:Marvel.jpg is also a lower resolution duplicate of File:Marvel logotype.jpg.

TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 17:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Primera portada de la SERIE 1.jpg is also non-free screenshot. Dsprc (talk)

Deleted: FASTILY 11:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that "Lucas FAdS" had uploaded this image under the given license (also possibly wrong information); shadowing looks quite complex for Commons:Threshold of originality TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 17:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator and because we already have File:MarvelLogo.svg. Green Giant (talk) 03:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmed1251985 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Ahmed1251985 (talk) 20:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning the files uploaded by user Ahmed1251985

please refer to Commons talk:Freedom of panorama/Archive 6,section (2.4 Summary) in the contents list. so basically panoramic pictures are not prohibited in UAE and if you think yes then why no legal action has been taken against tens of thousands of UAE pictures over the internet? p.s. the discussion is quite long but results can be obtained from the summary.

Hello I hope the Wikimedia Commons Community reconsider deleting the files that I have uploaded keeping in mind the discussion on Commons talk:Freedom of panorama/Archive 6,section (2.4 Summary) thanks --Ahmed1251985 (talk) 15:49, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Language school in São Bernardo do Campo (SP) - not really notorious. OAlexander (talk) 03:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because this is above the threshold of originality and it is unused. Green Giant (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)  Comment: Leaving aside contestable assertions of originality - Doug Pielli from alt has relieved us from the need to judge here by releasing in into PD: it is low quality and not notorious. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 09:45, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:38, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Consulnico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not really in scope (the one in use could easily be replaced by a free screenshot), additionally serious copyright issues: User interface, Wikipedia logo and photograph are copyrighted.

   FDMS  4    13:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Again, per COM:SS: Common proprietary web browsers include Microsoft Internet Explorer, Safari and Opera. Screenshots of these are never permissible on Commons if they show the browser's user interface.    FDMS  4    13:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because software screenshots are specifically catered for on some Wikipedias as unfree files. That is why we have tools such as w:Template:Non-free use rationale software screenshot and images like w:File:Safari in Lion.png. Green Giant (talk) 02:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, replaceable by any photo in Category:Train interiors of British Rail Class 350s. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Because that file is the only one that shows the train with passengers on it, as it is likely to be experienced Oxyman (talk) 16:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus to delete FASTILY 11:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work. Uploaded in 07.2012 ("own work") it was previously published via http://www.voanoticias.com/content/oea-contra-trafico-trata-ilegal-personas-119706284/97523.html (2011) = http://gdb.voanews.com/D9EFE7C6-64F1-4526-9C2E-5590F9BBFB8D_mw1024_n_s.jpg which might be {{PD-USGov-VOA}}. Note that the uploaded photo does not have the watermark "VOA". (...) Hmm... changing "s" to "b" in the image url, the watermark "VOA" disappears: http://gdb.voanews.com/D9EFE7C6-64F1-4526-9C2E-5590F9BBFB8D_mw1024_n_b.jpg

+ 1 year later (10.2012) the image is attributed via http://www.noticias24.com/venezuela/noticia/129466/embajador-de-paraguay-si-gana-capriles-venezuela-tendra-una-agenda-con-diversas-alternativas/ to "Foto: Twitter: @hugosaguier". Gunnex (talk) 07:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No exif data. Traumrune (talk) 20:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 11:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a tough one. At first glance I'd agree with Eugene but it appears the uploader may be the person in the photo, but that doesn't necessarily make her the copyright holder. There is a link on one of her websites which suggests that the subject of the photo may have uploaded the photo herself. By Wikipedia standards, she is a borderline case for notability in that there are some mentions. I would suggest that we err on the side of caution and drop a message to the uploader, perhaps both here and at Wikipedia, asking them to contact OTRS. If there is no response within a reasonable time, then obviously we should delete the photo. Green Giant (talk) 14:35, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 11:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heberte guedes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are currently available on Panoramio under the license all rights reserved. Despite of having a similar username, the Panoramio user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. Examples:


Gunnex (talk) 07:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 11:38, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 10:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep because it uses simple text shapes that are below the threshold of originality. Green Giant (talk) 17:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Pd-textlogo Natuur12 (talk) 15:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from © 2012 Criciúma E.C. [7]Borowskki (talk) 04:53, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deletebecause it is derived from a copyvio image that was deleted. Green Giant (talk) 03:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It remains a classic case of "textlogo" cum "simple shapes". The club simply asserts the rights over a trademark. This would in the same way apply for practically all logos retained under the "textlogo" and "simple shapes" provisos. In practical terms it means, that if you bang the logo onto a coffee mug to add value to an otherwise plain product and attempt to sell it you run into problems. The same would apply with the same surety if you do it with File:Logo FC Bayern München.svg, stored here under "textlogo" and "simple shapes", or with the logo of File:SaoPauloFC.svg for which a claim of it being "free" under {{PD-Brazil-media}} (first published more than 70 years ago) can be made. If logos, any logos for that sake, are used to identify their respective owners, there is no problem with that, that is what they have been created for. Else, we might have to go further: on the same page that is linked to by the proponent, the Criciúma Esporte Clube also asserts the rights over the use of its name.

From a historic viewpoint: until about 10-15 years ago, especially English and Spanish clubs, and also Brazilians, have been highly restrictive with regards to the republication of their logos, but their stance has long since been abandoned. The whole issue is handled well enough in the {{trademark}}-disclaimer. Arguments like an assumed threshold of originality or age are of very secondary nature in context with logos and trademarks. All over, we may have an enormous number of logos stored on all kinds of servers under Wikipedia/Wikimedia flag; requests for removal of logos by their actual owners in the last ten years I assume have been of a highly negligible quantity and may generally have been related with issues such as incorrect reproduction and obsolescence - a reason why I advocate the use of only the best possible reproductions.

What the Criciúma logos is concerned: definitively text and simple shapes and therefore permissible under the current framework. The discussion about the png-logo I ignored, as I don't see the need to retain numerous different versions of the same logo in different formats as this serves no real purpose. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 04:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Intriguing argument and one that I would agree with if this wasn't derived from a copyvio. Although you ignored the PNG issue, but isn't a derivative of a copyvio also a copyvio? Is there leeway just for different formats? Green Giant (talk) 04:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "case of the png" matters here not at all. The claim, that the logo in its current form was derived from anything matters only for the actual owners of the trademark. Technically I can download this logo in vector format from at least four sources, one thereof is the club itself. As there is no discussion related to the PNG-deletion I only can assume, it was understood as a prima facie cvio, probably because some erratic uploader claimed "own work", the rights to release it into PD, and/or whatever. A more benevolent administrator would have just adjusted the licencing information. But maybe, the admin just thought like me and cheerfully used the occasion to say good riddance to an uneeded variant. I since have adjusted the licencing information on the SVG object in question here and suppose, the matter is resolved.

I can also advise, that vector versions of the logo of Criciúma have been in the wild for more than ten years, and a request for removal has not been issued eg., to Mediabistro Inc, which under the brand Brands of the World provides the world's largest repository of logos in vector format. Mediabistro, based in New York, is a very polite organisation: they delete without recourse to any "legalese" language whenever this is requested by their respective trademark owners, no whatsoever talk about "low originality" or "simple shapes" there, which by itself is pretty devoid of respect for whatever work in the first place. Requests for deletions a generally only based on poor quality and alienated versions.

The issue in question would probably be best resolved by a withdrawal of the request. A more sustainable methodology with regards to Wiki and logos should be thought about. Discussions, eg. at at NonFreeWiki, might provide useful pointers. But then again, Wikimedia's legal advisors have to make a living too. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 07:29, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per well thought argument by Alexander. Green Giant (talk) 07:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Green Giant: : I thank you very much, highly appreciated! Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 09:51, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Apperantly okey Natuur12 (talk) 15:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture belongs to the Hulton Archive. According to the Getty Images web site, the picture has copyright. If we try to determine whether the copyright claim is abusive or not, we can examine the available information:

  • Date: 1940.
  • Author: not known. It's only known that it belonged to Keystone (see here to know more information about the company and here to see how the Hulton archive acquired the Keystone collection.

I don't really known which IPR laws apply here. If the Mexican ones (where the picture was taken), it could require 50 years after publication, as the picture is anonymous (don't know whether having an unknown author is the same as being anonymous), see here. If the American ones, it should be argued that the copyright was not renewed (can we claim that?). If it wasn't, it's in the public domain. If it was renewed, it's under copyright until 2035. I don't really know, so I'm opening this deletion request. Discasto 19:24, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Просьба дать печатный источник на авторство. В моем источнике автор не указан. С уважением, --Vizu (talk) 15:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No tengo ni idea de lo que estás diciendo, Vizu. -- Discasto 20:00, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 15:02, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]