Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/04/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 19th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my private REAL photo Please DELETE ! Andrew1996 (talk) 10:46, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per request Marcus Cyron (talk) 12:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It had the wrong name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polyglot (talk • contribs) 2014-04-18T23:21:34‎ (UTC)


Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 09:48, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonnotable signature of a nonnotable person, thus a personal file out of scope. add to that the potential for identity theft, if not a pseudonym Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A portait of the uploader? (unused) 91.65.158.216 10:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope russavia (talk) 13:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope russavia (talk) 13:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:10, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope russavia (talk) 13:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:11, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Meisam (talk) 14:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attack file name without proper evidence of permission (no EXIF) GZWDer (talk) 14:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:33, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:38, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is no private photo album; the educational value of this file is highly doubtful as long as it is not used on any Wikimedia project or on the uploader's userpage High Contrast (talk) 15:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:42, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:13, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused User page image -> out of scope. JuTa 20:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused User page image -> out of scope. JuTa 20:28, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, lacks permission. Fry1989 eh? 00:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Krd. Yann (talk) 11:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted cover of a book. Rapsar (talk) 08:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubts about authorship of the uploader, as the same image had been posted already in 2012 at http://www.urbanfreak.net/showthread.php/12609-COMITAN-y-sus-alrededores-proyectos-e-imagen?s=c0526479cd936a8d83537bf200093ff4&p=486149&viewfull=1#post486149 and http://www.skyscraperlife.com/ciudades-y-arquitectura/60501-vs-general-%7C-tuxtepec-oax-vs-comit%E1n-chis-26.html#post3936967 and was actually hotlinked from ImageShack. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 11:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:04, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attack picture with likely copyrighted trademark. The uploader's username is also offense. GZWDer (talk) 14:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused out of scope. Can be made by table feature. Meisam (talk) 14:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion Poeticbent talk 15:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, see COM:SCOPE. Kürschner (talk) 17:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks to me like out of scope, and/or copyright violation through COM:DW. JuTa 20:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bad quality selfy of an anonymous child — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddau (talk • contribs) 2014-04-19T20:14:35‎ (UTC)


Deleted / Corrupt.--Fanghong (talk) 03:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:10, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not needed anymore, if it is kept, it would be better to restore the full size picture, but I can't seem to undo my edit Polyglot (talk) 23:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 03:13, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is 404, but an OTRS ticket would be required to confirm the uploader is also the copyright holder of content from rohloff.de.    FDMS  4    01:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Didym (talk) 00:18, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Sole upload by this user. Description says nothing relevant. No mention of such a person in Wikipedia, no category to suggest any significance. Low resolution casts doubt on "own work". Adding that all up, unless someone can elucidate, I say delete. Jmabel ! talk 02:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt the own work claim. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, bad quality, and alternatives. Yikrazuul (talk) 10:28, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 21:28, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. · Favalli00:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per above. - Fma12 (talk) 22:10, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:11, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim about own photo (seems like a newspaper scan); no information about when and where it was originally published. Eleassar (t/p) 00:27, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It says Source: Facebook and Author: the actress herself. But there is no link, there is no proof that it was really her Facebook account, and since there is no link one can't verify if it was really posted under CC license. 188.101.5.162 00:28, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in South Korea, so unfortunately this has to be deleted russavia (talk) 00:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whilst VOA holds copyright over the photo, the protest posters are of copyrighted images, see COM:DW. russavia (talk) 00:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The USA has no Freedom of Panorama for modern sculptures. Leoboudv (talk) 05:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brazillian Lady.ogg, the audio equivalent of a personal photo. nonnotable programmed musical piece by a nonnotable person Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brazillian Lady.ogg, the audio equivalent of a personal photo. nonnotable programmed musical piece by a nonnotable person Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: , Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brazillian Lady.ogg, the audio equivalent of a personal photo. nonnotable programmed musical piece by a nonnotable person Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: , Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brazillian Lady.ogg, the audio equivalent of a personal photo. nonnotable programmed musical piece by a nonnotable person Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: , Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brazillian Lady.ogg, the audio equivalent of a personal photo. nonnotable programmed musical piece by a nonnotable person Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: , Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brazillian Lady.ogg, the audio equivalent of a personal photo. nonnotable programmed musical piece by a nonnotable person Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: , Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brazillian Lady.ogg, the audio equivalent of a personal photo. nonnotable programmed musical piece by a nonnotable person Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: , Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brazillian Lady.ogg, the audio equivalent of a personal photo. nonnotable programmed musical piece by a nonnotable person Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brazillian Lady.ogg, the audio equivalent of a personal photo. nonnotable programmed musical piece by a nonnotable person Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brazillian Lady.ogg, the audio equivalent of a personal photo. nonnotable programmed musical piece by a nonnotable person Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brazillian Lady.ogg, the audio equivalent of a personal photo. nonnotable programmed musical piece by a nonnotable person Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of authorship by editor who has only ever uploaded one image. Image is low resolution and appears to have been taken from a newspaper. Just saw this same image on a TV show on the ci channel which was produced before the image was uploaded. AussieLegend () 05:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of the banner. LGA talkedits 09:13, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysteriously edited, most likely grabbed from official site http://www.tabarestan.ac.ir which is (translated) "All Rights Reserved by (...)" or somewhere from internet. Gunnex (talk) 09:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusuable quality, alternatives given. Yikrazuul (talk) 10:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 19:37, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a free image, mobile phone picture of a picture (notice how the texture of the background in the top right is the same as the texture of the subject's neck, indicating this is a printed photo), uploaded by sockpuppet of Daffyduck1234, all of whose photo (exc. 1) have been deleted. Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mobile phone photo of a photo (note in the lower left corner how the texture of the legs is the same as the texture of the background to the right, indicating this is an existing photograph), uploaded by a sock of Daffyduck1234, all of whose images have been deleted (exc. 1) Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, see watermark -- 李博杰  Talk contribs 10:58, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 17:18, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I strongly doubt that this image is the uploader's own work. As you can see here, this photo was then used as an autograph card which was also signed personally by the General himself. High Contrast (talk) 12:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image here hangs for a long time. Why this hour you took alarm? --Ermanarih (talk) 22:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
...because it is a copyright violation or which problem do you have? Are you really this naiv to think that I watched this image in 2011 and waited 3 years to bring it to a DR???? You might image that I had contact with it recently. --High Contrast (talk) 20:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material / Image soumise aux droits d'auteurs LeJC (talk) 13:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://tripgarut.com/wisata-pantai-rancabuaya-di-garut-selatan/pantai-rancabuaya-3/ Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see any evidence of permission. If anything, the Wikipedia article indicates the contrary, to the extent it's even relevant. Bbb23 (talk) 15:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Cropped (watermarks removed) from http://www.bia2bardaskan.ir/Forum/Catgory/87/Post/56 (by "afshinbia2", uploaded "30 / 1 / 1391" = 04.2012) = http://axgig.com/images/22363081796076668253.jpg, uploaded at fawiki (fa:File:Farhangsaraye mehr - Bardaskan.jpg) only at 19.09.2012 and transferred in 12.2013 to Commons. Gunnex (talk) 16:23, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both files uploaded by fa:User:جواد + جواد (talk · contribs), apparently identical.Gunnex (talk) 16:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also (apparently the same local and Commons uploader):

Gunnex (talk) 16:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This lion seems to be the lion of Hesse - correct arms are File:DEU Ramberg (Pfalz) COA.svg - look to sources Juergenk59 (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The lion is taken of the Coaf of Arms of Hesse as seen here File:Coat of arms of Hesse.svg. That Coat of Arms is drawn by Gerhard Matzat. Das große Wappenbuch der Pfalz by Karl Heinz Debus tells us, the Coat of Arms of Ramberg is by Helmut von Jan, as seen in vectorized File File:DEU Ramberg (Pfalz) COA.svg. So File:Wappen Ramberg.svg is totally random and I don't see any benefit in keeping it here on Commons. Fränsmer (talk) 18:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Not in use + though being heraldically correct, this version is much less accurate than File:DEU Ramberg (Pfalz) COA.svg. Kathisma (talk) 21:07, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of original file: [1] Hilarmont (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only previous usage was as part of User:Ahmed Salim Abdulsadeh at en.wikipedia. That amounted to misuse of en.wikipedia as webspace and has been blanked. This image is out-of-scope and no longer in use. (User has made no contributions at either project aside from this photo upload and his personal page). Ubcule (talk) 21:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: / Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-scope and/or unused personal image. (Caption translates as "BEVICEME originated in 2013, is a group of young students LIBERTADOR INSTITUTE (IDL). This consists of: Celeste Mamani, Berenice Desmond, Melina and Victoria Vazquez Bases. Emm .. nothing .. Stamina Big Time Rush, Justin and 1D") Ubcule (talk) 21:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reverse image search suggests is a ripoff/parody of a Yu-Gi-Oh card. Probably out-of-scope, and content looks dubious anyway. Ubcule (talk) 21:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:37, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted software Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:50, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per this user's previous upload, s/he found it on Facebook. The user hasn't given us much reason to believe s/he is the uploader now. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non libre, copiée de http://www.legrandtour.fr/fr/page/10/presentation // non-free image, copied from http://www.legrandtour.fr/fr/page/10/presentation Habertix (talk) 23:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this map is about "World Homosexuality Laws" then why doesn't it include age of consent laws, homosexuals being allowed to serve in the military, and laws that prohibit GLB discrimination..? Those definitely qualify as laws that pertains to homosexuality and are very important to the GLB community. Furthermore, same-sex marriage doesn't necessarily have to be between homosexual/bisexual people because anyone regardless of sexuality can get married to the same-sex. How is same-sex marriage a law that pertains to homosexuality..? Plus, there's already a same-sex marriage map anyways. Either the marriage/partnership laws have got to go or this map should be deleted. Prcc27 (talk) 02:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit) This map is about the legality or illegality of same sex romantic/sexual relationships or actions. On the illegal side, it describes the level of punishment which can be dealt out, while on the legal side it describes the level of legal recognition in place. To have these contrasts in a single map gives much more information that it would having them in two separate maps, which I guess is why so many wiki pages use it. While I agree the name should perhaps be changed, deletion would be detrimental to the many wiki pages which use it. --  SLB (no) 05:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Silje: I would support a name change. --Prcc27 (talk) 07:37, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This map has many problems, but nothing can be perfect. By the way, a single map cannot show every LGBT law (discrimination protection, military...) : I had the same problem for my own LGBT rights map and I couldn't place the marriage constitutionnal bans, for instance. And... Why would the marriage laws not be LGBT laws? These are the most emblematic! So I would let this map as it already exists. Titanicophile (talk) 08:14, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Titanicophile: I disagree, this map should not exist as is. At the very least there should be a name change. --Prcc27 (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This map is widely in use, so it cannot be deleted except for copyvio, which is not alleged here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of the uploader of today. COM:OTRS required. Krd 11:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. No article on any wiki. Google gives only 4 results for this name, only from social networks. The uploader seems to be uing commons in order to create coats of arms for his relatives. 86.195.75.219 12:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - out of scope. no sources - CoA created for a friend / family member. pure fiction --Maxxl2 - talk 10:36, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as above. + uploader has not followed the rules by removing the DR tag. + I strongly suspect the uploader to have created User:Eliasgenio just to avoid the file suppression (at 12:52, 19 April 2014, uploader removes the DR tag, at 12:56, 19 April 2014‎, uploader adds the user page image tag, but user Eliasgenio is created only at 13:12, 19 April 2014). Kathisma (talk) 20:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP in Greece Krd 15:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no release from the Artist for this photograph of their sculpture and this appears to not have been considered when releasing the image on Flickr. (talk) 06:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There is no FOP for temporarely instalations in Hong Kong Natuur12 (talk) 22:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: Per en:Tabarestan University this Iranian university was established in 1996 which would fail {{PD-Iran}} (+30 years publication). The file is sourced with http://www.tabarestan.ac.ir which is (translated) "All Rights Reserved by (...)" Gunnex (talk) 09:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Original upload was configured with "source = www.facebook.com". Gunnex (talk) 09:24, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of a hotel and residential complex ("Narenjestan Hotel") located in Iran. Appears to be modern architecture failing COM:FOP#Iran. More infos at http://narenjestanco.com/ (related company) + http://narenjestan.com/ (the hotel). Gunnex (talk) 09:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also:

Gunnex (talk) 09:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of 2d artwork, not covered by COM:FOP Nilfanion (talk) 11:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 11:13, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

courtesy reason 78.215.56.130 15:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason given, file used, irreplaceable and (at least technically) in a good quality. Indeedous (talk) 19:37, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2012 07 05 Yael Abecassis.JPG

Yael Abecassis is an Israeli famous actress. She has an article in 9 wikipedias. this picture is realy unflattering. Her agent sent another picture File:Yael Abecassis.jpg and ask us to replace in all articles, which I did. I asked her to send us more pictures. I see no reason to keep this unflattering picture according with the policy Resolution:Media about living people]. thank Hanay (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept - nominated for the same reason three months ago and kept. No valid deletion reason. Commons is not censored. Jcb (talk) 21:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2012 07 05 Yael Abecassis.JPG

DR case re-opened per opinions at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFile:2012_07_05_Yael_Abecassis.JPG. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:01, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For rationale see previous DR by Hanay, above.

 Delete, per courtesy. As we have 2 better images of Mrs. Abecassis, we don't need to cling to this one. An additional, though probably minor point is that the EXIF data of this image state "All rights reserved" and credit some "ilan c". --Túrelio (talk) 21:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, אילן קוסטיקה = Ilan Costika or Ilan Kostika. so I am not sure we have problem her. Geagea (talk) 01:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. From the nominator reasons and the reasons mentioned in Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFile:2012_07_05_Yael_Abecassis.JPG. Geagea (talk) 01:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom. Jee 02:27, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as I asked above. Hanay (talk) 02:48, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I appear to be in the minority here, including opposing some colleagues whose opinion I value. Nonetheless, I think this is a difficult area. None of the WPs would allow the subject of a biography to edit it, except for correcting factual errors. Why should we allow the subject to edit our visual record?
This image shows an honest person in an off-hand moment, as she really is. It is not demeaning in any way, not even unflattering to my eye. The other two show only a movie star in full movie-star mode -- carefully posed with every hair in place. Which is the more honest or better image of the real Yael Abecassis? .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I Am sorry to say it and I hope I will not offend you. But your answer is a male answer. I believe that a woman would never give such an answer. As I said before this picture was taken in a private moment by user who act like a paparazzo. I also took many pictures of Israeli celebrity, but I ask their permission before taken it. Hanay (talk) 12:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps it is a male answer. In the subject image, I see an interesting woman. In the other two, I see a movie star, much less interesting. Movie stars are a dime a dozen, interesting women are not. That is beside the point, though. What concerns me here is that Commons should not allow people to censor our collection any more than WP would allow a movie star to edit out difficult moments in his or her career. The goal of all WMF projects is to present the world from a neutral point of view. Allowing the subject to censor our collection is not neutral..     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hanay, your accusation against the uploader is quite a serious one. Is there anything to suggest that the photographer was stalking or harassing the subject, that this photograph was taken in a setting where privacy was expected, or that the photographer was in any other way acting like a paparazzo in the established sense of the word? Or do you simply consider anyone who would take and upload candid photographs of public figures (which would include myself) a paparazzo? LX (talk, contribs) 14:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion when you meet a celebrity and you want to take his picture you should ask his permission, unless he his in a situation that he expected to be photographed. It is clear here that this picture was taking without asking Yael Abecassis permission. here some pictures that I took:
  1. File:Gideon Levi - Acre Festival 2011.jpg. Can you see how happy he is and he smile to me?
  2. File:Yair Stern 2011-portrait.jpg. He is also smiling
  3. File:שלמה בר אבא.JPG. This is a picture on stage, while he received a award in Haifa International Film Festival. Hanay (talk) 10:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't ask if you prefer non-candid photography to candid photography. I asked if you have anything to back up your allegation that Ilan acted like a paparazzo. LX (talk, contribs) 10:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep From a Wikipedia point of view I think it is reasonable to request that we use a different photo in articles. However, I don't see a valid reason for deleting the image from Commons other than as a courtesy, but this is not really an unflattering photo.On the contrary I think Jim is right when he says this is an honest view of her. The other photos are decent but they show her the way she wants to be seen. So what harm is there in keeping all three photos? Green Giant (talk) 20:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete There is another good picture of Mrs. Abecassis. I don't think that the purpose of this project is to present people from neutral point of view, but to present them. Mrs. Abecassis has sent as another photos that present her well, and I think it's only fair to delete this file. Eitan96 (talk) 13:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I spoke to Yael Abecassis agent today again. She said to me that they are going to send more pictures of her that look more natural.
In Hebrew wikipedia we also had a discussion on this picture after a user insisted that this picture should be in the article because it is more natural. No one agreed with him. see here. one of the users tzivya wrote: "Wow, one of the hallucinatory discussions I encountered . Mr. w, are you from the truth and justice police? Why a picture that she looked worse than in reality is better than a picture that she looked better than the reality? People went crazy" Hanay (talk) 10:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose I don't see this as unflattering photo: just natural, non posed. On an individual case it really does not matter, but as a matter of general principle of not letting individuals control their image on WP or Commons I think care is needed. If as has been mentioned other natural photos are added (and they are actually natural looking rather than just posed-natural) then I'd be less concerned. KylieTastic (talk) 15:26, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete This is obviously not a moment where the subject could have expected to be photographed (in contrast to being on a stage, e.g.), so, if we assume this photograph is taken in Israel, there is some kind of consent required per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people which is obviously missing. --Krd 07:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG file is not rendering properly by the server Jovian Eye storm 17:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gbawden as duplicate (Dup) and the most recent rationale was: licate|File:Mitsubishi Electric logo.svg. COM:D: "A bitmap (PNG, JPEG or GIF) file superseded by a vector graphic is not considered to be exact enough a duplicate. Such files ought to be listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that they may be decided upon, case by case." Indeedous (talk) 20:13, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Welches der fünf größten Aufzugsunternehmen der Welt gibt es in Deutschland bisher noch nicht? --84.61.172.74 20:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I will be more careful in future Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This may be a copyrighted image. Leoboudv (talk) 22:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv: - zero substantiation from you. Starship.paint (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that Myalexis on flickr (https://www.flickr.com/people/myalexis/) is the author and copyright holder. The EXIF kikapress.com as the copyright owner. If you browse through the other uploads at https://www.flickr.com/photos/myalexis/ you see a lot of paparazi shots from various different photographers & agencies. Martin H. (talk) 23:23, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

+File:Madalina Ghenea Cannes.jpg

We only have this 2nd photo on Commons, so getting rid of this bad flickr user is not so difficult. That photos copyright owner can be found at http://www.vogue.it/en/shows/focus-on-models/2012/01/madalina-ghenea, there the caption reads © Getty Images, and there we find it [2]. --Martin H. (talk) 23:28, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for modern permanently installed artwork or sculptures in the US. Leoboudv (talk) 23:44, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for modern permanently installed artwork or sculptures in the US Leoboudv (talk) 23:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful license (cc-by-3.0). The EXIF data indicates "Copyright 1977 Sports Illustrated". Still copyrighted in the US. No evidence that the photo was first published in Argentina so the source is not properly indicated. - Fma12 (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per metadata. Эlcobbola talk 14:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : google gives only 28 results for this name (mostly commons and social networks), no article on any wiki. The uploader seems to use commons to create arms for his relatives. 195.220.213.10 12:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Clearly out of scope. In addition, the uploader hasn't followed the rules by removing the DR tag on the file description page. Kathisma (talk) 14:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recreation of a file deleted for being out of scope. See the previous deletion request. Commons is still not a depository for creative drawings. 86.195.75.219 12:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alikotan1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and promo photo. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdrianVito (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo photos of band of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariolino57 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Poetry of questionable notability and images of unclear origins.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Exiut (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/file storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jersiabat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works of still living Luis Royo

Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: just copyright violations. JuTa 21:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanjaydws (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamappo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Corrupt & nonsense.--Fanghong (talk) 02:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Texascow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Own work claim more than doubtful. Obvious (c)vios already deleted.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 4mickey2004-05 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

from Disney Canada

Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per clearly copyvio. --Taichi (talk) 05:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no sources, no permissions

91.65.158.216 10:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a TV screenshot of w:Viktor Chebrikov, died in 1999 91.65.158.216 12:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 91.65.158.216 11:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Sorry but this statement is not enough to justify deletion Natuur12 (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful license (cc-by-3.0). The EXIF data indicates "Copyright 1977 Sports Illustrated". Still copyrighted in the US. No evidence that the photo was first published in Argentina so the source is not properly indicated. - Fma12 (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per metadata. Эlcobbola talk 14:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Idevries (talk · contribs)

[edit]

user art. I don't believe that these files will be used some day

91.66.244.128 09:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: More children's drawings. JurgenNL (talk) 17:28, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Idevries (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some kind of user art, but unused

91.65.158.216 11:29, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Greatjb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyvio via http://seyyed-kamal.blogfa.com/post-1358.aspx = http://www.mriu.ir/Gallery/pic/Album_0001/00000000_2009.06.17_295849.jpg (last modified: 2009, identical exif). Obs.: File:Mazandaran university of medical sciences logo.jpg was overwritten with this copyvio but the original upload (a logo) is available via File:Logo of MAZUMS.jpg.

Gunnex (talk) 12:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grmmmmpfff... (batch error, tagged now with copyvios)...


... but I take this opportunity, nominating:

configured with {{PD-because|official item legally exempt from copyright in its country of origin}} = ???

Grabbed from http://maz.webda.behdasht.gov.ir/index.aspx?siteid=357&pageid=39328&newsview=78004 (Copyright © 2010-2011 maz.webda.behdasht.gov.ir - All rights reserved.) = http://maz.webda.behdasht.gov.ir/uploads/sardar_135765.jpg (last modified: 2012)

Gunnex (talk) 12:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonia Sevilla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of modern sculptures, posters, paintings, etc, on display at an expo in Iran, where there's no FoP - see COM:FOP#Iran

INeverCry 17:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • the File:Holy Defece Week Expo - Simorgh Culture House - 7 pavilion - Nishapur 002.JPG dont show any subject need deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonia Sevilla (talk • contribs) 11:27, March 7, 2014‎ (UTC)
plz an Iranian user talk to me,everyone knows better his county than a passenger.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 21:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 06:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonia Sevilla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status + unlikely to be own work. Uploads (mostly in 03.2014) by +18k-edits user Sonia Sevilla (talk · contribs). I expected some counter-arguing by uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammad Reza Bateni.jpg but all +/- 20 files got deleted without any reaction. All files below were - before upload date in Commons - previously published by several photographers. False claim of authorship. Permissions needed.


Gunnex (talk) 20:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Uploader Sonia Sevilla via User talk:Gunnex#my pic: "hi. i want say to u that i have 3 cameras and also i can get my frnds cameras, so the diffrence of camera is not reason taht i upload bad pics, but for lastly photos,: it was a mistake in upload,my pc folders is busy and it may i thinked that they are mine, u know,i upload eveynight, somestimes i dont even see the pics,i just want upload i my own pics, so dont block me,just delet them,and i promise to be more careful." Gunnex (talk) 21:37, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 19:19, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonia Sevilla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are all of a small size and often somewhat blurred. They are all claimed as "own work" however in those that have EXIF information I can count at least 10 different cameras. This and the fact that there is a history of uploading questionably licensed images suggests to me that there is no proof at all that these can be freely licensed by the uploader. I've only looked at the most recent uploads - there are questions about others too I think.

Herby talk thyme 10:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Times changes. Computers changes. so metadates will lost. they are old , some taked by in 2010 or 2011. diffrent cameras? this is personal. everyone can have 100 cameras. i said in my pages: All files i upload exactly not taked by myself, taked by friends... . but they are mine. they taked and presented to me for uploading here. --Sonia Sevilla (talk) 10:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

this files are cropped, that mean they WAS uploaded by another user. i focused on face. --Sonia Sevilla (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

what u said about this last cropped files? nothing.many user crop and focus on face and upload again. u like a robot tagged all my last files. --Sonia Sevilla (talk) 11:14, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Rajaa Alem -joint winners of the 2011 Arabic Booker Prize (Cropped).jpg and File:Dalil Boubakeur (Cropped).jpg should be okay. The sources you provided were a bit hard to follow, but I've fixed that. You are still claiming to be the author and copyright holder of File:Ahmad Alam ul-Hoda 1 (cropped).jpg and File:Ahmad Alam ul-Hoda 2 (Cropped).jpg on the file descriptions. If they are crops of someone else's work, you must attribute the legitimate author and copyright holder. You also blanked out the notices pointing to this discussion despite clear instructions not to do so. Don't do that again. LX (talk, contribs) 13:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Those other two are cropped from Sonia Sevilla’s own originals (not listed in this DR), now aptly linked with {{Extracted from}} and {{Extracted image}}. -- Tuválkin 14:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I vote  keep for the four crops, always dependant, of course, on the status of their originals. -- Tuválkin 14:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader is adamant that these are their own works. So we are to believe that the uploader personally created:

Yes, one person may have 100 cameras, but it's unusual and unlikely. Most people who own a Nikon D300S wouldn't downgrade to its predecessor D300. Most people don't switch back and forth between incompatible DSLR systems. Most people who own a professional grade Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II (or Canon EOS 5D Mark II) wouldn't trade down to a Canon EOS 40D (or Canon EOS 50D) from one week to the next. Most people with an already aging iPhone 5 wouldn't swap it out for an even older Galaxy S3. This uploader has a demonstrably liberal relationship with the truth, and these claims just aren't credible. LX (talk, contribs) 13:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well researched and summarized, LX, thank you. It should be noted that Sonia claims some photos were taken using borrowed devices, but things like this don’t help her case for a developed understanding of copyright and licensing. Sonia has had, from my part, at least, a large extra amount of god-faith assumption and sympathy, but it is wearing off. -- Tuválkin 15:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 keep It seems that all these pictures are taken by one person. All are celebrities of a nation. --Doostdar (talk) 13:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -The most of them were allready deleted by other admins. A few kept. --JuTa 21:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arpiart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Modern art, artist's permission required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arpiart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art which requires artist's permission via OTRS. User's remaining uploads are group shots of people and a single person's portrait.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 19:20, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arpiart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small no metadata images, unlikely to be own work, most particularly the ones reproduced from prior photos and publications.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:50, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Some speedied as unambiguous COM:DW/COM:NETCOPYVIO. Эlcobbola talk 15:44, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Files deleted by various admins as speedies. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arpiart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and promo photos. I think artist/photographer identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful license (cc-by-3.0). The EXIF data indicates "Copyright 1977 Sports Illustrated". Still copyrighted in the US. No evidence that the photo was first published in Argentina so the source is not properly indicated. - Fma12 (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per metadata. Эlcobbola talk 14:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamsafar1247 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. All these files, uploaded in a row on 02.10.2009, are sourced and authored with "Kashmar municipal website " = http://www.kashmari.ir/ (a city in Iran) and licensed with {{FAL}}. http://www.kashmari.ir/ is "تمام حقوق مادی و معنوی این سایت متعلق به پایگاه خبری شهرستان کاشمر می باشد " = "All Rights Reserved (...)". Permission from "Kashmar municipal website " and the involved photographers needed as it is most likely that the photos were taken by multiple persons. See also File:Kashmar saffron1.jpg versus Google (before upload date). Per User talk:Hamsafar1247, some of the city related uploads were already deleted due to missing permission.

Gunnex (talk) 17:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted but not by me Natuur12 (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The related page on it.wikisource was deleted due to Violazione di copyright, resulting in this upload being orphan here on Wikimedia Commons since August 2011. Description page on Internet Archive says that the writer died on 1994, making this work still copyrighted in the country of production. Lugusto 00:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ok, --Xavier121 11:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is quite obviously not "own work" and I cannot find the original source. A lot of British Raj prison photos have surfaced in recent years and have never previously been published, which if applicable in this case would additionally make this a violation of India's copyright legislation. Sitush (talk) 10:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a family photograph, passed on by subject to descendants and released into the public domain. There is no copyright violation. The photograph is over 90 years old and no copyrights were requested or violated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.66.5.18 (talk • contribs) 12:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: According to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory_-_full#India, photographs taken before 1958 were under copyright for fifty years after creation, so the question of whether it was published or not is moot. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: I think that now, as we have COM:DM#Slovenia and this image has been included in the categories 'Lamps in Piran' and 'Benches in Slovenia', it needs another look at. In my opinion, the inclusion of the bench and the lamps is not incidental here, but is a key subject, and they can't be removed from the image or replaced with something else at will. Eleassar (t/p) 09:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you have added this categories. And you really don't get DM.--Sporti (talk) 10:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Everything looks DM to me except the two buildings, I, if I understand correctly, they are not a problem. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cc-by-nc-nd A non-free liscense is used MorganKevinJ(talk) 03:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted qualifies for immediate deletion abf «Cabale!» 07:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FOP in Greece Krd 15:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erm … any explanation, User:Korrekturen?  Speedydelete, uploader agrees.    FDMS  4    15:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Its deletion of usefull pictures, nothing else what's going on here. Senseless, useless, a fault. "no FOP" in Greece means nothing for whom soever. No need for "speeddelete", no need for "delete" at all. Yours --Korrekturen (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it's useful, it's still a copyvio. FOP stands for Freedom of panorama.    FDMS  4    19:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
FOP is clear but there are pics in the category from inside the stadium.
Where is your question regarding FOP there?
Where is the deletion request there?
This photo is widely used.
But if anybody wants to work: There is a Category:Stadiums in Greece, a large field of possible deletion requests that nobody will understand.--Hic et nunc (talk) 15:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Read WP:Other stuff exists. It's not that difficult to understand.    FDMS  4    15:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not difficult to understand and I'm definitely able to read and understand english language. But this here is not Wikipedia. We are on Commons.--Hic et nunc (talk) 11:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

According to §26 of the Greek Copyright Law as last amended in 2003, the occasional reproduction and distribution by means of mass communication of images of works of architecture, works of the fine arts, photographs, and works of the applied arts is allowed for works permanently situated in a public place without the consent of the author of the work and without payment of any remuneration.  Keep --Korrekturen (talk) 15:26, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's the first paragraph. Did you also read the second?

Since the exemption only allows for distribution by "means of mass communication", and not for other potential uses (e.g. a student wanting to illustrate an assignment), it does not allow everybody free use. It is also unclear exactly what "occasional" reproduction means.

   FDMS  4    16:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Images of the stadium infringe on the architect's copyright. The fact that other images whould also be deleted is irrelevant. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, we can't upload modern books to Commons without appropriate permission. Dinamik (talk) 14:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Описание файла конкретизировано с добавлением издательства и коллектива авторов, а именно: Издатель: Министерство юстиции Узбекистана Автор: Аҳмедов Г., Муминов С., Махкамов А., Азимов Х., Отабоев А. Под общей редакции М. Рустамбоева.Sho.ha (talk) 14:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Нам нужно разрешение от авторов книги на публикацию под свободной лицензией.
We should have permission from authors of book. Dinamik (talk) 20:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Эта книга - сборник воспоминаний о М.Хакимове 34 человек - на сегодняшний день их возраст от 70 до 100 лет, тем самым большинства из авторов уже нет в живых. Не думаю, что для прямого наследника М.Хакимова возникнет запрет от здравствующих авторов книг на публикацию под свободной лицензией, просто это вопрос не одного дня, а время идет. Но если на данном сайте загрузка книги все же невозможна, посоветуйте пожалуйста, куда её можно загрузить, чтобы дать на нее ссылку в своем тексте на wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sho.ha (talk • contribs) 19:40, 26 апреля 2014‎ (UTC)

Если считать авторами тех, кто давал комментарии, то необходимо отсчитывать 70 лет с момента их смерти (для тех, кто умер), если считать авторами тех, кто писал книгу - 70 лет с момента их смерти (для тех, кто умер). Технически книгу можно разместить на одном из бесплатных хостингов (поисковый запрос "бесплатный хостинг"), но не факт, что на книгу, размещённую с нарушением авторских прав, можно будет дать ссылку. Dinamik (talk) 08:45, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If we decide as authors people, who gave comments, we should count 70 years from their death (for people, who died), if we decide as authors people, who write book, we should count 70 years from their death (for people, who died). There is technical possibility to upload book to some free hosting (search string "free hosting"), but I'm not sure, that we can give link to book, which was uploaded with copyright violation. Dinamik (talk) 08:45, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Благодарю за разъяснения и очень жаль, что наследники имущественных и неимущественных прав ученого, кому и была посвящена книга, не имеют на неё прав , хотя книга была издана именно по инициативе наследников и эксклюзивные фотографии включенные в книгу предоставлены из семейного архива. В ближайшее время планируется дополненное переиздание книги, и, я надеюсь, на этот раз будут учтены интересы наследников. Еще раз спасибо. --Sho.ha (talk) 13:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Actual flag is here in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 17:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в лицензии. Нет информации об авторе. Dogad75 (talk) 22:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No source or author. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image shold be deleted because another image "Different views of testicles of a 42 years old adult.jpg" has been uploaded. The new image is of better quality and provides better presentation of the object Abhsn (talk) 06:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not identical images and per Matt Ezarateesteban 22:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения заявленной свободной лицензии. Dogad75 (talk) 17:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio/No Permission Captain-tucker (talk) 09:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of non-significant organization. Art-top (talk) 11:08, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения заявленной свободной лицензии. Логотипы, как правило, охраняются авторским правом. Dogad75 (talk) 12:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Captain-tucker (talk) 09:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет подтверждения заявленной свободной лицензии. Dogad75 (talk) 17:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio/No Permission Captain-tucker (talk) 09:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнение в авторстве. Встречается в Интернете ранее загрузки в Википедию http://www.heavymusic.ru/photos/int373-2.jpg, и в большем разрешении http://dark-world.ru/files/bands/photos/Neron-Kaisar/dw_317bzrm1.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 17:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 10:10, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by FDMS4 as no source (No source since)... There is now a source provided, but I am unable to find the photo at the source. The image may be fine now, or it may be a COM:COPYVIO, I am changing this to a DR to let the community decide by consensus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mluvím česky a německy. Takto se moc k diskuzi nevyjádřím.--Lenka Lyalikoff (talk) 22:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permission required Captain-tucker (talk) 08:32, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Авторство неясно, см. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Группа_ДК_2001.JPG Dogad75 (talk) 17:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 08:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Авторство неясно, см. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Группа_ДК_2001.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 17:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission Captain-tucker (talk) 08:29, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fastily as no source (No source since)... While I do not disagree that it is missing a licence at the present time, there is a German license applied to the image. I am converting this to a Deletion Request to get the sense of the community whether this is a valid license for this image or if it is not. The file is in use on a LOT of pages. Not that "in use" trumps COM:COPYVIO, just pointing that out. The letter appears to be 73(?) years old. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteI think "no source" is irrelevant. I don't think there is any doubt that this is an authentic document, so the question of how it ended up on Commons is not important. This will probably need a German legal expert to solve. Since Goring died in 1946, it is still under copyright unless the {{PD-GermanGov}} on it is correct. I am troubled by "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment (official work) issued by a German federal or state authority or court". In English, it is none of those. "Decree" comes closest, but a decree is a public order with the force of law. This is simply a written order to a subordinate and would not be called a "decree" in English. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept as {{PD-ineligible}}. While Jim is right and this is not part of any statute, ordinance etc., the sentences of the letter are simple and banal enough to be below the treshold of originality. Rosenzweig τ 15:46, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild wurde laut Quelle in den 1940ern aufgenommen, also zwischen 1940 und 1949. Der angegeben Urheber wurde nach eigenen Angaben aber erst 1967 geboren, er kann das Bild also gar nicht gemacht haben. Deswegen sehe ich ein Problem, da evtl. eine Urheberrechtsverletzung vorliegt. Pustekuchen2014 (talk) 17:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wie bereits in der zuvor stattgefundenen Diskussion dargelegt, wird dieses Bild bei mindat.org als Werk mit den Rechten bei Herrn Hupperich liegend geführt. Nutzer Pustekuchen hat es versäumt meiner Anregung zu folgen, Herrn Hupperichs anzusprechen, er kann die Bildrechte auch ererbt oder erstanden haben. Bilder nur aufgrund eines Verdachtes löschen zu wollen halte ich für mißbräuchlich, mit Verdachtsmomenten kann jedes Bild auf commons gelöscht werden. Ich wünschte mir eine beleghafte Vorgehensweise, keine von Vermutungen geprägte.

Hinweis: Infos und OTRS-Nr. gibt es bei der Category:Files_by_Leon_Hupperichs hier. Grüße --Agricolax (talk) 21:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As per OTRS ticket # 2011022710007909 Captain-tucker (talk) 09:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author field says that Daimler und Benz Stiftung is the author. Under german copyright law there is no transfer of copyright possible. The author is the original photographer, the photographer is written in the EXIF of the file, the EXIF is pretty clear about the photographers copyrights. The uploader maybe is not aware that they can not do whatever they want with a photo even if they paid the photographer and own the original photo. Written permission from the photographer to the license is required. Martin H. (talk) 17:48, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Ich bleib mal bei deutsch: Klar ist der Fotograf und sein Disclaimer in den EXIF. Allerdings schreibt er dort selbst, dass es zwar normalerweise nur grundlegende Veröffentlichungsrechte gibt ("wenn nichts anderes vereinbart wurde"), allerdings kann man gegen entsprechende Bezahlung alles andere auch haben ("Jegliche darüber hinaus gehende Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe von Nutzungsrechten an Dritte bedarf meiner vorherigen schriftlichen Genehmigung und ist gegebenenfalls honorarpflichtig.") Bei solch großen und professionell arbeitenden Institutionen würde ich immer annehmen, dass sie sich die entsprechenden Rechte sichern bevor sie irgendwelche Fotos veröffentlichen. Zumindest haben sie im OTRS garantiert bestätigt, dass sie die Nutzungsrechteinhaber sind, also dürfte die Verantwortung bei denen liegen, dass das auch stimmt. Ich sehe hier keine ernsthaften Zweifel sondern die bloße Vermutung, dass es dem Uploader nicht klar sein könnte, was ich bei professionellen PR-Abteilungen eher weniger glaube. --Indeedous (talk) 19:52, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: What Martin said. Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 20:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The robot would be a copyrightable design. russavia (talk) 12:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(I am the uploader/photographer.) I doubt it, per Commons:Design; see also Category:Robots or for that matter other product-related categories. It's got a tiny screen - so do other robots in that category - but I'd say de minimis applies here since it's barely even recognizable what's on it.--Eloquence (talk) 21:49, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Eloquence: , firstly the laws you are using at Commons:Design are US law, and it is South Korean law that is pertinent in this situation. South Korean copyright law is renowned as being necessarily stringent. I should have noted in the opening that this would be on COM:PRP grounds, unless one can show that in South Korean law the robot wouldn't be a copyrightable object. russavia (talk) 23:57, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Russavia: Citation please for the relevant differences in applicable law. In addition, this is a very basic design so copyrightability questions arise regardless of jurisdictional differences.--Eloquence (talk) 05:34, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear copyright status. Unless we know in certainty that this is a freely licensed design, we must assume that this is a derivative of non-free content FASTILY 20:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2014-06#File:Seoul-Ubiquitous_Dream_11.jpg. Yann (talk) 18:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]