Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/03/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Out of scope. Spam only account and this file doesn's look like own work either so permisison is missing. Natuur12 (talk) 00:17, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyright violation Techman224Talk 00:25, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused pornographic image, unneeded. Brainy J (talk) 14:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: ...gif file stolen from the internet. Martin H. (talk) 15:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Out-of-scope and/or personal image that isn't in current use. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 08:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Serial promo/copyvio account. INeverCry 17:11, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:Гор- Томск 2014-03-21 23-14.jpg Sven Manguard Wha? 22:30, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope, self-promotion /St1995 21:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Also, see this discussion [1] /St1995 21:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS Avi (talk) 04:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Images quite identical : File:Siene River 15 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 16 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 17 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 18 2012-07-01.jpg. I plan to keep File:Siene River 18 2012-07-01.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 17:58, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:36, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Images quite identical : File:Siene River 15 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 16 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 17 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 18 2012-07-01.jpg. I plan to keep File:Siene River 18 2012-07-01.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 17:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:36, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Images quite identical : File:Siene River 15 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 16 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 17 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 18 2012-07-01.jpg. I plan to keep File:Siene River 18 2012-07-01.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 18:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 21:36, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Scope? Fry1989 eh? 02:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright problem. Willy Prager (1877–1956) not only performer, he is also author of this song. See: http://home.allgaeu.org/cgallenm/Zwarg/Beka11001.pdf Ctac (talk) 20:42, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion rubin16 (talk) 11:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hotpicsgallery2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope, possible copyvios.
- File:Home alone with sister.jpg
- File:Interracial love.jpg
- File:Rough with sister.jpg
- File:Sister awake.jpg
- File:Teens together.jpg
ireas (talk) 04:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios uploaded by sockpuppet. INeverCry 16:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Buggy SVG, weird angles; replaced by File:Butachlor structure.svg. Leyo 15:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 10:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality ({{BadGIF}}), better version available in en:Hexol. Leyo 15:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, low quality overall, and the numerical details of the charges and sulfates are illegible. File:Werner's-second-hexol-2004-2D-wedged.png looks fine. DMacks (talk) 03:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 10:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Poor quality ({{BadGIF}}), better version available in en:Hexol. Leyo 15:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality overall, and the numerical details of the charges and sulfates are illegible. File:Hexol-2D-wedged.png looks fine. DMacks (talk) 03:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Has one use, at wikibooks:it:Chimica organica/Stereochimica. I usually have trouble editing at wikibooks, so someone else please handle the replacement to make the nom'ed item unused. DMacks (talk) 03:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 10:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete /St1995 22:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete /St1995 21:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete /St1995 21:58, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete /St1995 22:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete /St1995 21:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete /St1995 21:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete /St1995 22:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Urheberrecht — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vicus bonnensis (talk • contribs) 2014-03-22T04:47:36 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission for shown artwork. Krd 17:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:42, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
imho out of scope as being one of 18 'selfies' (as of March 22, 2014) as only contributions by user:Arjundaliar, please see also User talk:Arjundaliar as of 2 November 2 2012, thx Roland zh (talk) 19:42, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope Krd 17:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:30, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Krd 17:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:DW. Jespinos (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
It's a scan from a magazine in 1992, i don't believe, that the uploader has the right to publish this pictures under a free licence. Ras67 (talk) 00:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission show shown magazine page. Krd 17:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted Krd 17:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted Krd 17:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Selenium user --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted Krd 17:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
It's a scan from a magazine, i don't believe, that the uploader has the right to publish text and pictures under a free licence. Ras67 (talk) 00:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission show shown magazine page. Krd 17:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
It's a scan from a magazine, i don't believe, that the uploader has the right to publish this text and picture under a free licence. Ras67 (talk) 00:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission show shown magazine page. Krd 17:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
It's a scan from a magazine, i don't believe, that the uploader has the right to publish this text and picture under a free licence. Ras67 (talk) 00:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission show shown magazine page. Krd 17:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:30, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
If User:HQ211559 really is Vanessa Benelli Mosell, she can't be the creator, because she is the motif Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - upload stamp had "Alain Taquet", later changed to "Vanessa Benelli Mosell" for no obvious reason. –Be..anyone (talk) 06:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
{{speedy|authorized cancellation}}
Deleted: Obvious copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:11, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
wrong misleading redirect RomanM82 (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Small size, low resolution and missing camera data make this unlikely to be user's own work and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: appears in http://www.calzavara.it/lang/es/products/telecommunications/bbstruct_advertising_sign_pole.html COM:PRP Ezarateesteban 20:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Unused personal image Sven Manguard Wha? 02:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, no educational purpose Ezarateesteban 20:27, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope (not educationally useful) ireas (talk) 02:08, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, no educational purpose Ezarateesteban 20:26, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Small size, low resolution and lack of camera metadata make this unlikely to be own work of user and instead possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:04, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: It has metadata but it isn't in use, no educational purpose Ezarateesteban 20:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Because it is unfinished, I had more plans for it and would prefer it not to be here. Wildermind (talk) 02:19, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, uploader request Ezarateesteban 20:29, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Image marked (c) Roy Riley with no indication of relationship (if any) to uploader, small size, low resolution, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Image marked (c) Roy Riley with no indication of relationship (if any) to uploader, small size, low resolution, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:07, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Image marked (c) Roy Riley with no indication of relationship (if any) to uploader, small size, low resolution, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:07, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Out-of-scope and/or personal image that isn't in current use. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, no educational purpose Ezarateesteban 20:28, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Out-of-scope and/or personal image that isn't in current use. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, no educational purpose Ezarateesteban 20:28, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Out-of-scope and/or personal image that isn't in current use. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, no educational purpose Ezarateesteban 20:29, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
promotional context, not used Motopark (talk) 08:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:40, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Flickrworker (talk) 12:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:07, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
self-promotion and no evidence that the photograph is within the scope, with an educational purpose — billinghurst sDrewth 12:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:18, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:07, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
promotional context, not used Motopark (talk) 08:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
promotional context, not used Motopark (talk) 08:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
promotional context, not used Motopark (talk) 08:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:19, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
La publicación como promoción no significa que un imagen está en el dominio público. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright violation, see [2]. ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 17:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
promotional context, not used Motopark (talk) 08:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, self-promotion, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:19, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
promotional context, not used Motopark (talk) 08:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
promotional context, not used Motopark (talk) 08:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: image was previously deleted by another admin. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 07:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:30, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: , Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:39, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Edgar Alonso ibargüen amaya,nació un 8 de julio de 1991 en el poblado de la ciudad pueblo nuevo durango alas 6-00 horas desde el nacimiento hasta los 16 años vivió en dicho poblado a los 17 empezó a vivir 2014-03-21 10-42.jpg
[edit]private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
OTRS needed Tekstman (talk) 15:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
OTRS needed Tekstman (talk) 15:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Flickrworker (talk) 14:30, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:37, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
OTRS needed Tekstman (talk) 15:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Mirrored duplicate of bigger File:James II by Peter Lely.jpg, also with wrong filename. Not in use Shakko (talk) 09:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Support. The upload was basically a mistake.—Austriacus (talk) 12:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: file previously deleted by another admin. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope/advertising. Flickrworker (talk) 17:58, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:55, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Flickrworker (talk) 18:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope/promotional Flickrworker (talk) 18:04, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:56, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:56, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
There was no need to create a new page, I'll update a previous one Ddcampayo (talk) 18:50, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:03, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Flickrworker (talk) 18:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. SamuelFreli (talk) 10:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Flickrworker (talk) 18:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Copy of http://marc-michiels.com/2013/img/bio/bio.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:41, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope Flickrworker (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GRS73 as Copyvio (copyvio) - Converted to DR because of "{OTRS pending}" in the permission section Sven Manguard Wha? 22:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: image was deleted by another admin. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
pvriate image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:08, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:19, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:07, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Flickrworker (talk) 18:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope , promotional image. ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 17:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GRS73 as Copyvio (copyvio) - Converted to DR because of assertion of OTRS pending on other upload Sven Manguard Wha? 22:25, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: image was deleted by another admin. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Doubledutch781 (talk · contribs)
[edit]User is stealing from facebook. I found one of his uploads in the facebook profile of the depicted TV actor. The 720px size of some other uploads shows that this isnt the only photo that Doubledutch781 took from facebook, 720px isnt a usual format for any software or camera, its the facebook default thumbnail size. I have doubt that this user ever made a photo of a notable person.
- File:Rocco Nacino.jpg
- File:Joyce Ching.jpg
- File:Sheena Halili.jpg
- File:Mona Louise Rey.jpg
- File:Mark Herras.jpg
- File:Jillian Ward.jpg
- File:Jennylyn Mercado.jpg
- File:Julie Anne San Jose.jpg
- File:Kristofer Martin.jpg
- File:Bea Binene.jpg
- File:Carla Abellana pic.jpg
- File:Richard Gutierrez pic.jpg
- File:Dennis Trillo pic.jpg
- File:Lauren Young.jpg
- File:Aljur Abrenica.jpg
- File:Andrea Torres.jpg
Martin H. (talk) 12:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- No opinion about most (yet), but * File:Barbie Forteza.jpg was not uploaded by Doubledutch, but by me, and not from Facebook, but from Flickr, properly cc-marked, and out of a large set of photos from the event in question. --GRuban (talk) 19:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, GRuban, for the note, removed that from the list. Doubledutch previously uploaded a facebook copyvio under the same filename, the script i used to start this request got it wrong. --Martin H. (talk) 23:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:17, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Doubledutch781 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Size, format, subject and lack of metadata suggest these are more images from other sites (including Facebook) not user's own work. User's other uploads nominated for deletion here, these are COM:PRP, COM:COPYVIOs, as well.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:17, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Files from many different locations and very different quality, unlikely own work claim. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 06:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chandmubeen (talk · contribs)
[edit]private image, out of scope
Indeedous (talk) 13:23, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:31, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlexDaQueen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:42, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Estebanmpx (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Text documents which should be replaced with wiki-table.
- File:Transporte Público Córdoba.PNG
- File:Autotransporte Córdoba.PNG
- File:Lineas de colectivo Córdoba.PNG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Collection of advertisement. Tables should be replaced with wiki-markup.
- File:300C7.png
- File:300C2.png
- File:CitroenC66.png
- File:CitroenC65.png
- File:VelSatis Silniki.png
- File:Opirus5.png
- File:Opirus4.png
- File:VelSatis części.png
- File:VelSatis FL.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:40, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
copyrights violation from [2] Assayas (talk) 13:36, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: image was previously deleted by another admin. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope (w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rebelma7/Fast Heart Mart). MER-C 10:44, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:06, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope, duplicate of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Фото 4.jpg Indeedous (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DSkyHellsing (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:DSkyHellsing/Telego Mobile - Philippines).
- File:Cover for website.jpg
- File:Telego logo with W980 and W400.png
- File:Telego Mobile Phones ~ Adrian.jpg
MER-C 10:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as advertising, non-educational, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Cover of Wide Eyed by Trinie Dalton, drawings by the author.jpg
- File:Sarah Cain, “Kiss” (2013).jpg
- File:Detail view of Sarah Cain’s “Burning Bush” exhibition at Galerie Lelong.jpg
- File:Sarah Cain, “Kiss” (2013), acrylic, beads, and string on canvas, 126 x 72 inches (320 x 182.9 cm).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:43, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gatodelostexados (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of fan/promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Locomo.jpg
- File:Papacn.jpg
- File:Papacos2.jpg
- File:Papacos1.jpg
- File:Discosecreta.jpg
- File:Full.jpg
- File:Full2.jpg
- File:Full4.jpg
- File:Full3.jpg
- File:Full5.jpg
- File:Full7.jpg
- File:Full8.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UTTAM 400 1500 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal and low quality files of blocked in enwiki user.
- File:MY MEDALS.JPG
- File:MY SELF.JPG
- File:UTTAM IN ASSAM.JPG
- File:Uio.jpg
- File:Jjjjjjj.JPG
- File:Uttam in action as FLAG BEARER.JPG
- File:My new school.jpg
- File:Uttam with his staff.jpg
- File:FAMILY.jpg
- File:MY ADIDAS SHOES.JPG
- File:MY SHOES.JPG
- File:ASSAM.JPG
- File:GOUDA.jpg
- File:Balu..022.jpg
- File:Flash1.jpg
- File:TINKU.jpg
- File:UTTAM ATHLETE.jpg
- File:UTTAM KUMAR GAUDA.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:37, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sojonepskens (talk · contribs)
[edit]See COM:PORN.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedro master 2013 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.
- File:Articulo La informática como una disciplina.pdf
- File:ARTICULO CIENTIFICOS DE LA TESIS DE MAESTRIA.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:41, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sokna choeun (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:59, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Venaventours (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of advertisement, software screenshot and logos.
- File:Jinaainwayuu.jpg
- File:Entrehilosycolores.jpg
- File:Artedelasmanos.jpg
- File:Venaventours.png
- File:Venaventours 016.jpg
- File:Venaventours 014.jpg
- File:Venaventours 013.jpg
- File:Venaventours 011.jpg
- File:Venaventours 010.jpg
- File:Venaventours 012.jpg
- File:Venaventours 007.jpg
- File:Venaventours 009.jpg
- File:Venaventours 008.jpg
- File:Venaventours 006.jpg
- File:Venaventours 005.jpg
- File:Venaventours 004.jpg
- File:Venaventours 003.jpg
- File:Venaventours 002.jpg
- File:Venaventours 015.jpg
- File:Eduardo Ruiz.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 13.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 12.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 11.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 10.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 09.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 08.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 07.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 05.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 06.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 04.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 02.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 01.jpg
- File:Disfrutando en Waterland 03.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Venaventours (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios or out of scope.
- File:Afichito.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita15.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita16.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita14.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita13.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita12.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita11.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita10.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita9.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita8.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita7.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita6.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita5.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita4.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita3.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita1.jpg
- File:Norberto D´Abreu - Artista Plástico.jpg
- File:Mujeres... Tradición infinita2.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
deleted. INeverCry 01:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution. But nice girl:)
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Fails FOP in France. Organisation established in 1963 and I think they moved here in 1970. Therefore the building is to new to be exempt from FOP. Flickrworker (talk) 10:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:16, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Taken from http://www.ohioccn.org/ which has no explicit copyright notice to release their logo as "free software" as far as I can tell. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, incorrect source link (fixed), license out of thin air, NN enwiki use. –Be..anyone (talk) 05:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Not ok according PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 07:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 06:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 06:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Image from here, marked copyright, possible COM:COPYVIO as this version contains no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Source "Space Engine" website is marked "Copyright Vladimir Romanyuk © 2011-2014". Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:54, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Not ok according PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 07:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Not ok according PD-Text/Logo. Aga (d) 07:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
File not at source given which 404s (not found). Description says "screenshot", so probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 08:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Image is of small quality, no metadata. User's other uploads were overprinted with (c) and photographer's name. Possible COM:COPYVIO due to size, quality and COM:PRP. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:10, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 08:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 08:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 08:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Source "Space Engine" website is marked "Copyright Vladimir Romanyuk © 2011-2014". Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:54, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Image not found at soure given. Unlikely to be user's own work and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 08:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Plain commercial advertisement, out of project scope (Examples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Advertising or self-promotion.) Ies (talk) 06:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 14:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 19:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: source — Revicomplaint? 10:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
It’s unlikely that this is an ‘own work’, see the credits below the image and the file uploaded in enwiki. ireas (talk) 02:11, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
REPLY: Regarding: File:Mission Point buildings 1969, conference center & library, Mackinac Island.jpg
This photo belongs to Mackinac Island State Historic Parks (Phil Porter, Director; Kelsey Schnell, Assistant). They have posted it in the Mission Point historical museum. Initially, I myself uploaded it as non-free because it did not belong to me. Phil Porter had given me permission to do this.
Because Wikipedia objected to this upload, I contacted Phil and Kelsey on March 21 and asked them to upload their photo so that it would be 'free', which Kelsey did. They chose to use the Description that I previously used.
In my Mission Point (Mackinac Island) article, I then deleted MY non-free upload and pasted in Phil and Kelsey's free upload. Therefore, the 'nomination for deletion' no longer applies to this photo.
Sincerely, Karin D. E. Everett karindeeverett@yahoo.com
Mackinac Island State Historic Parks (http://www.mackinacparks.com/parks-and-attractions/mackinac-island-state-park/)
- Hi Karin, thanks for the reply. It would be the best if an official of the Mackinac Island State Historic Parks sends a permission to permission-commons@wikimedia.org (see Commons:Email templates for information on how that email should look like). Regards, --ireas (talk) 20:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
TO Ireas I will again contact Phil and Kelsey. I'm sure they will be happy to send the email as you suggest. Cheers, Karin
TO Ireas (March 27): Phil Porter (Director of Mackinac Island State Historic Parks) has now emailed his permission letter to permission-commons@wikimedia.org. This should take care of the problem, right? Cheers, Karin
- Received and
Accepted
permission. Thank you all for your contributions. Grashoofd (talk) 21:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS-received Natuur12 (talk) 13:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the photographer deceased more than 70 years ago, so this work is very likely still copyrighted. De728631 (talk) 22:32, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Claim that these World War II photos licensed by uploader Silar with {{PD-Polish}} were published in Poland without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 is not supported. Grabbed from "Ebay", "Internet" or other random sources. I doubt if uploader really has bothered to find out the author, considering User talk:Silar. Most likely NOT Polish works. Note that {{PD-Polish}} explicitly indicates: "Please provide where and when the image was first published.", which is not given. May be in PD by other means, but relevant info must be provided.
Nominating also (same context/uploader):
- File:01939 Der judische Wohnbezirk in Sanok (1939)..jpg
- File:01943 Panzer-Instandsetzungs-Kraftfahr-Werk in Sanok.jpg
- File:01940 Bauern in Sanok.JPG (grabbed from Ebay, {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}})
- File:00016 Sanok, Lwowska street, Poland, deportation of the Jews to Soviet Ukraine in 1939..jpg
- File:1939 in Sanok.jpg
- File:Deutsche Wehrmachtssoldaten im September 1939 in der Nähe von Sanok.jpg
- File:"Jews fixing a bridge for the German, september 1939 in Sanok".jpg Gunnex (talk) 08:25, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- This is a bit vague. This photograph is useful as an illustration, clearly public domain, and without a clearer explanation I would default to
Keep. --Fæ (talk) 05:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Originally uploaded to en.wp by a user with very few edits and uploads, one of which (still at en.wp) was oboviously scanned from a printed source (see moiré pattern). Considering these circumstances, I find it rather unlikely that this 1974 image is actually own work as claimed. It should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 12:31, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
De que forma o editor comprova ser autor da logomarca? Como uma logomarca pode ter uso livre? Tonelada D C @ 14:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted logo Natuur12 (talk) 13:15, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status: No evidence to support the claim that this 1940 photograph is in public domain via {{PD-Old}} as the author is "unknown". Source country most likely Germany. Grabbed from http://allegro.pl/, an online auction website based in Poland. May be in PD by other means but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 08:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Image from SCI. Missing permission. See Conditions of use. Reise Reise (talk) 13:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused out of scope Flickrworker (talk) 12:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The picture shows a horse in costume looking like a skeletal horse. The picture has metadata and is part of a series of pictures of a ceremony. I didn't find very many photos of horses in costumes and I don't see any quality reasons for taking this one out. It's of large size and it has camera metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:10, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In scope Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Not PD in US per URAA (uploaded image erronously - sorry) Coat of Many Colours (talk) 22:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- migrate to english wikipedia as "fair use" in infobox. Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 17:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Per m:Legal and Community Advocacy/Wikimedia Server Location and Free Knowledge Natuur12 (talk) 13:10, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:2011 Comic-Con International
[edit]Copyrighted artwork and movie props that raise copyright concerns shown. For File:ErinFitzgerald-posingwithher-MonsterHigh-Characters.jpg, it might be possible to crop the image.
- File:Chris Sanders Comic-Con 2012.jpg
- File:Comic Con 2011 (5984103703).jpg
- File:ErinFitzgerald-posingwithher-MonsterHigh-Characters.jpg
- File:Game of Thrones pedicab.jpg
- File:Matt Groening (5979816719).jpg
- File:Matt Groening (5980330593).jpg
- File:Matt Groening drawing Bender (5979820105).jpg
- File:Matt Groening drawing Bender (5979820565).jpg
- File:Matt Groening drawing Bender (5980379756).jpg
- File:Matt Groening drawing Popeye (5979821247).jpg
- File:Peter Avanzino (5980380440).jpg
- File:Richard Alf.jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future "A Match Made in Space" book cover (Profiles in History booth) (6039790708).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future "Tales from Space" comic book (Profiles in History booth) (6039790634).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future clock tower cable (Profiles in History booth) (6039790492).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future Doc and Einstein close-up stop watches (Profiles in History booth) (6039240615).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future Docs burned toy Cadillac (Profiles in History booth) (6039790748).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future flux capacitor (Profiles in History booth) (6039791556).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II alternate reality newspapers (Profiles in History booth) (6039240749).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II alternate reality USA Today newspapers (Profiles in History booth) (6039790284).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II Blast From the Past bag and receipt (Profiles in History booth) (6039240449).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II future binoculars (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II future soda bottle set and Biff's cane (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II future sunglasses (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II Grays Sports Almanac and Oh LaLa Magazine (Profiles in History booth) (6039240375).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II hoverboards (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II large Biff check (Profiles in History booth) (6039240321).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II Marty's future watch (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II sleep-inducing alpha-rhythm generator (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future III Delorean power converter on the hood (Profiles in History booth) (6039241383).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future working insert stop watches (Profiles in History booth) (6039790426).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Batman Begins Batmobile Tumber movie prop (Legendary booth) (5976450635).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Captain Nemos Nautilis model (6039244207).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Claras Back to the Future III telescope (Profiles in History booth) (6039241025).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - life-sized Lego Batman (DC Comics booth) (5985863130).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Marty's Back to the Future II hoverboard (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Superman Returns movie props (Legendary booth) (5977014678).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Total Recall outdoor display (5985865074).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Total Recall outdoor display (5985865428).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Two Faces coin from the Dark Knight (DC Comics booth) (5985301675).jpg
- File:The Playboy Club at Comic-Con 2011 - photo op.jpg
Gazebo (talk) 04:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- These files are too disparate to consider them all together. I was notified because of File:Game of Thrones pedicab.jpg, and I think that it is not copyrighted as a derivative work because it mainly depicts an utilitarian object, while copyrighted content is de minimis. Sandstein (talk) 08:19, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Mostly agree with Sandstein, too many and too disparate, need separate nominations. That said, though, I looked at half a dozen and in most the copyrighted content is de minimis, or not at all. For example, * File:Matt Groening drawing Popeye (5979821247).jpg - what is the copyrighted content even supposed to be? A rough, poorly done (sorry MG), sketch of Popeye? We've got a whole Category:Popeye of Popeye images, they're not necessarily copyright infringements, and this one certainly isn't. Another example, * File:The Playboy Club at Comic-Con 2011 - photo op.jpg - what's the copyrighted content - two tiny rabbits on a huge wall? Maybe a few are not de minimis, but most seem to be. --GRuban (talk) 18:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Game of Thrones pedicab.jpg -- the throne back clearly has a copyright.
- File:The Playboy Club at Comic-Con 2011 - photo op.jpg -- the stage set as a whole has a copyright
- File:Matt Groening drawing Popeye (5979821247).jpg -- while it is clear that we do have Category:Popeye, it's also clear that most of the contents should have a DR.
With that said, however, I agree that this is too broad a DR to stand. There are at least half a dozen different discussions that could take place about these images and no good way to deal with all of them in one place. If another Admin concurs, I think we should close this immediately and suggest that User:Gazebo reopen it as six or eight different DRs. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: I agree with Jim. Some are clearly not okey but some might be okey. But it is impossible to have a proper discussion this way. Please nominate them again in seperate DR's clustered by smaler groups. Natuur12 (talk) 13:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:2011 Comic-Con International
[edit]These images should be evaluated; utilitarian non-artistic objects are not copyrighted but models or nonfunctional replicas of utilitarian objects (which is likely to include many movie props) can be copyrighted, from what one understands. In addition, some of the images include photos of scenes from the "Back to the Future" movie.
(As a side note, the "Back to the Future" movie came out in 1985; works first published in the US without a copyright notice (and no copyright registration within 5 years of publication) on a substantial number of copies prior to March 1, 1989 are out of copyright in the US. Though the movie itself is undoubtedly properly copyrighted, there might be an issue with certain artistic items that for copyright purposes were effectively published without a copyright notice; however, it is not clear that the inclusion of an item in a movie constitutes publication and the rules for unpublished works are different.)
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future "A Match Made in Space" book cover (Profiles in History booth) (6039790708).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future "Tales from Space" comic book (Profiles in History booth) (6039790634).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future clock tower cable (Profiles in History booth) (6039790492).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future Doc and Einstein close-up stop watches (Profiles in History booth) (6039240615).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future Docs burned toy Cadillac (Profiles in History booth) (6039790748).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future flux capacitor (Profiles in History booth) (6039791556).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II alternate reality newspapers (Profiles in History booth) (6039240749).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II alternate reality USA Today newspapers (Profiles in History booth) (6039790284).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II Blast From the Past bag and receipt (Profiles in History booth) (6039240449).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II future binoculars (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II future soda bottle set and Biff's cane (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II future sunglasses (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II Grays Sports Almanac and Oh LaLa Magazine (Profiles in History booth) (6039240375).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II hoverboards (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II large Biff check (Profiles in History booth) (6039240321).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II Marty's future watch (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future II sleep-inducing alpha-rhythm generator (Profiles in History booth).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future III Delorean (Profiles in History booth) (6039241167).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future III Delorean power converter on the hood (Profiles in History booth) (6039241383).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Back to the Future working insert stop watches (Profiles in History booth) (6039790426).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Claras Back to the Future III telescope (Profiles in History booth) (6039241025).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - plutonium case from Back to the Future.jpg
Gazebo (talk) 08:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 18:47, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:2011 Comic-Con International
[edit]Derivative works of copyrighted characters and models
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Batman Begins Batmobile Tumber movie prop (Legendary booth) (5976450635).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - life-sized Lego Batman (DC Comics booth) (5985863130).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Superman Returns movie props (Legendary booth) (5977014678).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Two Faces coin from the Dark Knight (DC Comics booth) (5985301675).jpg
Gazebo (talk) 08:32, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:2011 Comic-Con International
[edit]These images should be evaluated as to whether they are derivative works of the Bender character or whether they are a noninfringing form of fan art.
- File:Matt Groening drawing Bender (5979820105).jpg
- File:Matt Groening drawing Bender (5979820565).jpg
- File:Matt Groening drawing Bender (5980379756).jpg
- File:Peter Avanzino (5980380440).jpg
Gazebo (talk) 08:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Is it actually Matt Groening drawing? If Matt Groening is drawing it, it can't be fan art, although it probably doesn't matter much for deletion purposes.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 09:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:2011 Comic-Con International
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Batmans Dark Knight costume (DC Comics booth) (5985301825).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - giant animated Transformers Optimus Prime statue (Hasbro booth) (5993391638).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Magic the Gathering character (Wizards of the Coast booth) (5976789123).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Spike statue (Sideshow Collectibles booth) (5976449363).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - WWE statue (5977016136).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 00:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sed-Oupouaout (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status: No evidence to support the claim that these 1930s photographs are in public domain via {{PD-Old}} as the author(s) are "unknown". Source country most likely France. May be in PD by other means but relevant info must be provided.
- File:36. vue ancienne salle pneumothorax.jpg
- File:32. vue ancienne pavillon des enfants.jpg
- File:1. Vue d'un des trois grands bâtiments au temps du sanatorium.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:56, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mjgcairns88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios or out of project scope.
- File:Mike TV 2014-02-13 14-30.jpg
- File:Mike TV logo 2014-02-13 13-22.jpeg
- File:An image of actor Martin Owens-Cairns 2014-02-07 17-26.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
不為本人，肖像授權，未經本人同意上傳，管理者請刪除該照片 111.254.122.49 04:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Doesn't seem like own work Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:2012 Comic-Con International
[edit]Copyrighted models, artwork, and closeups of the Comic Con logo shown.
For File:Debra_Birnbaum_(7604955638).jpg, there is the Comic Con magazine cover and for File:Damian_Holbrook_(7600030488).jpg, there is the photo that Damian is showing on the tablet.
- File:Ballroom 20 stage (7592961664).jpg
- File:Bartman statue (7584118888).jpg
- File:Boba Fett (7584121400).jpg
- File:Comic Con International - 14 July 2012 (7590751060).jpg
- File:Comic-Con logo (7584127124).jpg
- File:Damian Holbrook (7600030488).jpg
- File:Darth Maul statue (7584123308).jpg
- File:DC Entertainment booth (7584117600).jpg
- File:Debra Birnbaum (7604955638).jpg
- File:Gollum (7584125246).jpg
- File:Gollum (7584137734).jpg
- File:He-Man castle (7584119534).jpg
- File:Justice League poster (7584118260).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con sign (7584143482).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con sign (7607415480).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con sign (7607415834).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con sign (7607416446).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con sign (7607417152).jpg
- File:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (7584116148).jpg
- File:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (7584135222).jpg
- File:The Hobbit - Troll statues.jpg
- File:Transformers (7584126100).jpg
Gazebo (talk) 03:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW etc Natuur12 (talk) 13:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:2012 Comic-Con International
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Batmobile (1995 Batman Forever).
- File:DSC 9114 (7645006580).jpg
- File:DSC 9115 (7644996908).jpg
- File:DSC 9116 (7645018282).jpg
- File:DSC 9119 (7645046014).jpg
- File:DSC 9121 (7645065498).jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2012 - The Batmobile from Batman and Robin (7585257426).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Horst Hill
[edit]Unclear copyright status: No evidence to support the claim that these 1941 photographs taken (as indicated by uploader Silar) by Horst Hill (most likely German, people of the Wehrmacht) are in public domain via {{PD-Old}}.
- File:05605 Sanok 1941.JPG
- File:05606 Sanok 1941.JPG
- File:05609 Sanok 1941.JPG
- File:05614 Sanok 1941.JPG
- File:05621 Sanok 1941, Kazimierza.jpg
- File:05622 Sanok 1941, Mickiewicza.jpg
- File:05610 Sanok 1941.JPG
Gunnex (talk) 07:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Not covered by FoP. The photographs and text are likely to be copyright of B&NES Council or their contractors per Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Photo of 2D notice in the UK Rodw (talk) 11:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Not covered by FoP. LGA talkedits 21:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Is this in any way within our project scope? Abderitestatos (talk) 19:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hugues Malbreil is born in 1955. Copyright violation. 82.120.33.103 21:11, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
We have obvious redundancy between File:Jupiter.Aurora.HST.UV.jpg, File:Satellite Footprints Seen in Jupiter Aurora.jpg, and File:Hubble Jupiter Aurora (NASA) (420376085).jpg. Now my suggestion is to delete the latter two, because as I said, they are obviously upscaled by a factor of 4. Obvious squares of 4*4 pixels show that. So the resolution of the first mentioned file is actually higher than that of the other two. (2842×1617 pixels after crop, divided by 4 equals 710.5×404,25, which is lower than 752×417.) The first mentioned is also the original file NASA released here: http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2000/38/image/a/, where they give it out as "The best resolution available". The encoding we have here is encoded at -quality 98 with no chroma subsampling. So there is little possibility of significant quality loss. File:Hubble Jupiter Aurora (NASA) (420376085).jpg has the same content and resolution as File:Satellite Footprints Seen in Jupiter Aurora.jpg when we strip captions and borders - which I believe we want to do because we don't want hardcoded borders in the file and for the caption information we have metadata in file descriptions and image annotations. I already moved that information to the file description of the first mentioned file. Scanmap (talk) 18:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use so the file is in scope Natuur12 (talk) 16:31, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
We have obvious redundancy between File:Jupiter.Aurora.HST.UV.jpg, File:Satellite Footprints Seen in Jupiter Aurora.jpg, and File:Hubble Jupiter Aurora (NASA) (420376085).jpg. Now my suggestion is to delete the latter two, because as I said, they are obviously upscaled by a factor of 4. Obvious squares of 4*4 pixels show that. So the resolution of the first mentioned file is actually higher than that of the other two. (2842×1617 pixels after crop, divided by 4 equals 710.5×404,25, which is lower than 752×417.) The first mentioned is also the original file NASA released here: http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2000/38/image/a/, where they give it out as "The best resolution available". The encoding we have here is encoded at -quality 98 with no chroma subsampling. So there is little possibility of significant quality loss. File:Hubble Jupiter Aurora (NASA) (420376085).jpg has the same content and resolution as File:Satellite Footprints Seen in Jupiter Aurora.jpg when we strip captions and borders - which I believe we want to do because we don't want hardcoded borders in the file and for the caption information we have metadata in file descriptions and image annotations. I already moved that information to the file description of the first mentioned file and migrated the Wikipedia articles to the original, unbloated version. Scanmap (talk) 15:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:15, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Google+ trademark/logo shown on the top left 78.35.226.127 17:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. That argument applies to any of the dozens of videos recorded via Hangout and hosted here. I would argue strongly that Commons:De minimis applies here, particularly given that the Google watermark is unavoidably inserted by the software, so no court of law would likely find against someone copying/reusing/remixing a video from a Google Hangout recording.--Eloquence (talk) 01:05, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - textlogo, cf. Google wordmark.svg:
. –Be..anyone (talk) 05:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC) - Question: This file uses Wikipedia logos. Should it be tagged with Template:Copyright by Wikimedia¿ 173.85.202.169 19:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Patrick_Abercrombie_-_NPG_x82059.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_acrylic,_beads,_and_string_on_canvas,_126_x_72_inches_(320_x_182.9_cm).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Patrick_Abercrombie_-_NPG_x82059.jpg){kind=link}
_Patrick_Abercrombie_-_NPG_x82059.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Patrick_Abercrombie_-_NPG_x82059.jpg){kind=link}
_Patrick_Abercrombie_-_NPG_x82059.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039790708).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039790634).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039790492).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039240615).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039790748).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039791556).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039240749).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039790284).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039240449).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039240375).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039240321).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039241383).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039790426).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5976450635).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039241025).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5985863130).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(5977014678).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5985301675).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6039241167).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5985301825).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5993391638).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5976789123).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5976449363).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(420376085).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kept: pd-textlogo Natuur12 (talk) 13:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hugues Malbreil is born in 1955. Copyright violation. 82.120.33.103 21:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Collection of fan/promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:EN NUESTROS CUERPOS SE SIENTE AMOR.pdf
- File:RUMBO AL MIDEM.jpg
- File:OSCAR BHER CANTA " QUERIDA MIRTHA ".jpg
- File:PRESENTACION EN VIVO, AVANCE DE SUS NUEVAS CANCIONES.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:15, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hugues Malbreil is born in 1955. Copyright violation. 82.120.33.103 21:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Persons shown wish to be removed. Chadwmason (talk) 02:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - in use again on enwiki, maybe unintentionally. Flickr source is gone (404). –Be..anyone (talk) 04:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: No relation between user requesting deletion and uploader or creator. Please see Commons:Contact_us/Problems/en for further discussion. Krd 17:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yogesh9509967332 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Such a poor quality image. Flickrworker (talk) 17:50, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- We can keep it until there is a better picture. --Goroth (talk) 07:56, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete There is a better picture File:Obey the Brave NSD! Tour 2012 Cologne 2.JPG from the same concert, slightly better view of the same band. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope. Do we really need pictures of people doing homework? Flickrworker (talk) 17:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Yes, we do. -- Tuválkin ✉ 03:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 13:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Non-free comic on the bus, not de minimis. Eleassar (t/p) 17:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Not the uploaders own work - can be found on various websources in the same and even higher resolutios (!) 188.104.111.241 15:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 13:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
film by greenpark production in association with the Film Producers Guild Ltd for the Ministry of Information [3]; [4] Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 22:51, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- As the film states on the caption card at the beginning, this was produced "For the Ministry of Information" which means that it was covered by Crown Copyright. This has expired, so the film is in the public domain.--DavidCane (talk) 01:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- I would like to see a link for that assertion that producing "for" necessarily means that Greenpark Productions gave up their copyright. I thinks that's rather unlikely. They're still in business as a film archive and vigorously defend their copyrights. I should declare an interest: I posted here at Wikipedia Non-free content review expressing regret that a very fine Howard Coster image that was used for visual identification in the Patrick Abercrombie article has been replaced by what looks like a still from an old P. G. Wodehouse sitcom. The Coster image, even reduced 0.1 MP, is streets ahead of this total train wreck shit image we now have to put up with just because it's 'free', and it's the more galling when you consider that there is an excellent 1942 Elliott & Fry image that is PD in the UK but can't be used because of the US URAA technicality. Believe me it's not a good outcome as far the Wikipedia article is concerned. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 05:42, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- w:Crown copyright: "cinematograph films made by or under the direction or control of Her Majesty or a Government department"; in this case does "for" = "by or under the direction or control of" when others are specifically mentioned "by", could have said "by" and did not. Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 14:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- I would like to see a link for that assertion that producing "for" necessarily means that Greenpark Productions gave up their copyright. I thinks that's rather unlikely. They're still in business as a film archive and vigorously defend their copyrights. I should declare an interest: I posted here at Wikipedia Non-free content review expressing regret that a very fine Howard Coster image that was used for visual identification in the Patrick Abercrombie article has been replaced by what looks like a still from an old P. G. Wodehouse sitcom. The Coster image, even reduced 0.1 MP, is streets ahead of this total train wreck shit image we now have to put up with just because it's 'free', and it's the more galling when you consider that there is an excellent 1942 Elliott & Fry image that is PD in the UK but can't be used because of the US URAA technicality. Believe me it's not a good outcome as far the Wikipedia article is concerned. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 05:42, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure there wasn't a deliberate deception here. The date is 1946, not 1945 as uploaded see the BFI database here. It follows it doesn't satisy the US URAA technicality. It's irrelevant that HMSO says Crown Copyright expiration acts worlwide. In US copyright law this work was till in copyright the URAA date and thus is not in PD. I've templated accordingly. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 07:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- There was no deception intended. I used the 1945 date given a Vimeo, but if it was 1946, that does not substantial change the facts. Why is it irrelevant if HMSO declares it out of copyright? If the UK government considers material it produces to be out of copyright and freely reproducible after fifty years ([5]), for whose benefit would copyright protection be enforced? The Greenpark Productions website linked above does not list the film and the search tool does not appear to be working, nevertheless, if the company vigorously defends its copyrights, it seems strange that this film has been on Youtube, Vimeo and the Internet Archive since 2011 unchallenged.
- I agree that the Howard Coster image is sharper than the one I uploaded, but that is definitely not PD and was being used in the absence of a PD alternative. --DavidCane (talk) 13:39, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- did not link to source. apparent lack of enforcement does not mean it does not exist. excellent search for images, might want to find images that are missing, rather than provide dubious marginal utility. Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 14:10, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I was surprise to see that after all that have been said in Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, here user are still want to delete pictures. Hanay (talk) 18:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Problem mit Bildanzeige wegen falschem Format? (TIF) Nasenbear (talk) 18:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, Problem gelöst mit {{LargeTIFF}}, {{compressed version}}, Danube_River_in_Vienna_around_1570_(2).png. –Be..anyone (talk) 05:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sollte man dieses Bild nicht doch löschen? Da es wegen des großen TIF-Formats Anzeigeprobleme gegeben hat, habe ich gleich darauf dasselbe Bild als JPG hochgeladen. Es ist somit jetzt zweifach vorhanden.
- Category:TIFF als Archivformat ist völlig in Ordnung, der MediaWiki-Fehler wird irgendwann mal repariert. In diesem Fall ist nun allerdings auch ein PNG vorhanden, da müsste mal ein Archivar prüfen, ob im TIFF wirklich noch erhaltenswerte Meta-Daten zusätzlich zum PNG stecken. –Be..anyone (talk) 00:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Image isn't broken, MediaWiki is. James F. (talk) 17:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
See en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 16#Photographs by Nikola Gruev. A user found the terms of this template dubious and thinks that the template may be unfree. The statements at bg:Уикипедия:Разрешения за ползване на материали/Никола Груев#English do indeed look dubious:
- "Only pictures we include in Wikipedia articles fall under the GFDL. If you wish to use other pictures for another purpose, please contact the author for permission." Does it mean that the images in fact aren't covered by the GFDL but that they are covered by some non-free variant? Is permission only for Wikipedia and not for Commons? Is it a revocable version of GFDL so that the images only are available under GFDL as long as they are in use on Wikipedia?
- "Don't take everything. In the articles, one ot two pictures maximum." This is clearly incompatible with GFDL: if something is licensed under GFDL, it is possible to use any number of pictures on a page.
There is a long discussion about the template on the template talk page, partially in Bulgarian. Stefan4 (talk) 22:23, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- Mr Nikola Gruev was very kind to let us use his large collection of digtal(ized) photos from Bulgaria at the very beginning of bg.Wikipedia, at a time when few people had a digital photo camera (even fewer in Bulgaria) and when almost all Bulgarian wikipedians were out of Bulgaria (few Bulgarians had internet). Today, when most editors are inside Bulgaria and have cameras, the pictures of Mr Gruev can easily be retaken if the community decides. Stopping our use of these pictures wouldn't do much harm to Wikipedia. But before deciding, let me reply to your questions.
- The pictures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and used in articles in Wikipedia or other projects of WMF are irrevocably covered by the GFDL and any reuse (anywhere else) must respect this license, especially the "attribution" part and the "remind the license" part.
- Our agreement is that we can take from Mr Gruev's galleries any picture we (wikipedians) like to illustrate our articles. Once it is on Commons, it is GFDL and can be reused. Mr Gruev doesn't want to "free" all his pictures (publish them under an irrevocable free license like CC ot GFDL), but only those which we need for articles. To simplify things, instead of asking him for permission for individual pictures, we already have the permission.
- The "one or two pictures maximum" was in my initial letter to Mr Gruev to request permission. Clearly, Mr Gruev has reasons to not select a free license for all his galleries and we should respect this. We really don't need more than 2 of his pictures in an article: either the place is accessible and well known and there are many free pictures (or people who can take such), or the place is not well known and the article wouldn't be huge so it wouldn't need a ton of pictures (and if it did, we place a link to Mr Gruev's gallery page so any reader can see all pictures if s/he likes).
- Mr Gruev is aware that once the picture is in a Wikipedia/Wikimedia article, it is irrevocably freed and can be reused elsewhere under certain conditions (GFDL).
- Mr Gruev has agreed after my first message in his public guestbook on 02-Nov-2004 (search for "GFDL"), then we had a longer communication by e-mail to reexplain the free/GFDL part, then several years later he took part in the discussions here on Commons and on bg.wiki [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] to confirm that he had understood the terms and that our agreement stands.
- For these reasons, I would vote to Keep the template and the pictures, and I invite others to do so. --5ko 05:47, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- Delete This template makes me uneasy. The terms of the agreement suggest that if an image is taken out of WP:BG that it is then no longer covered by the agreement and we apparently do not have OTRS permission in any case. Since 5ko believes that we do not need more images from NGruev, I suggest that we get a clear CC-BY-SA license using [[Commons:OTRS}} for the ones we are using. Otherwise, I think we have to delete the template and all of the images covered by it. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Keep (Erh, sincere apologies for not coming to share my view earlier, despite of being tipped on my talk page: too much off-wiki business.) Raised personal concerns in the past were the reason for having the initially given permission double-checked, re-requested and - not surprisingly - re-confirmed. So far, I know not of a case when Gruev's images, as published in Wikipedia, have raised the copyright holder's concerns if used elsewhere. And I'm sure that having been in personal contact with him, I'd be among the first to hear. :) I declare that all specifics of the free licenses have been explained to Mr. Gruev in details and meticulously by both my colleague Petko Yotov, 5ko, and me. So, do we really need to ask for that permission for the third time? In the eyes of an elderly non-Wikipedian who is not necessarily as copyright paranoid as we are here :) this may really look fishy now. And I have certain experience with Bulgarian artists whose permission has been requested in order to have photos of their works here. These people usually give permission readily, though less formally, simply as a natural answer to emails that have been sent to them. In general, I firmly believe that especially people who are more elderly or more technically challenged or not know English themselves should not be forced to provide their permission with the exact articulation of COM:OTRS, as long as they have been well explained and have agreed to release a work freely. Different countries also have their specifics and Bulgaria is still a place where people are in general not freaky about their copyrights and are more generous and ready to release, thus increasing the visibility and positive publicity of their works. I believe that there is no particular reason for us being afraid of that template. Thank you for drawing my attention to that case and for your patience. :) →Spiritia 16:52, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Of the images covered by this template. Possibly change the template to {{GFDL}} where the image was definitely in use on Bulgarian Wikipedia with the note stating such change.
Neutral on the template itself. Sinnamon (talk) 15:45, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Kept: hmmm, borderline and very old case, that nobody "likes" to decide. Feel free to renominate. JuTa 20:48, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
This has been nominated for deletion previously: Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:NGruev with a rather non-commital close. The closing administrator User:JuTa left no predjudice to reopening the discussion. According to the linked website, the images cannot be used for commercial means. The "requirements" that the author lists at [12]include limits to how the images can be used. Due to the limits and the restriction of non-commerical, these files copyright status is in dispute. The author gives permission for use on Wikipedia, but the conditions do not make a free license. This is a bad template, that promotes the use of images that do not actually have a full free license. In addition, all images that use this template should be deleted, unless other evidence of copyright is provided.
TL;DR The author of the images does not truly release the images under a free license (or at least he doesn't want to) yet this template incorrectly parades it like it does. -- TLSuda (talk) 21:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- This statement is incorrect, please read the almost 10-years old discussions. Mr Gruev agreed, confirmed, and re-confirmed that his pictures in any Wikimedia projects are irrevocably GFDL (and can be re-used under that license elsewhere). --5ko 22:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Let me start by saying that I think Commons accepting images that have only a GFDL is poor policy. As a practical matter the requirements of GFDL make it impossible to use such images in any print medium and difficult for many web sites. However, whether I like it or not is not vital, because it is, unfortunately, policy.
- However in this case we are told, that part of the arrangement is "Don't take everything. In the articles, one ot two pictures maximum" -- that is not a free license. A free license allows the user to take as many images as he wishes and use them for whatever purpose he wishes. Therefore this template and all the images that depend on it should be deleted unless we can get the source to agree to a truly free license, even if that is only a GFDL. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing changed in the last 10 years about the license of these pictures uploaded to Commons. --5ko 22:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- From what I read, nowhere does Mr. Gruev say that this images can be used for anything, including non-commercial purposes, under the GFDL license. In fact, the content does put extremely specific requirements on what content can be used and how it is used. Any agreement on his part for the GFDL license only seems like he thinks he is releasing the images to only be used on Wikipedia. -- TLSuda (talk) 14:13, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe you think something but don't understand completely, and it is my fault because I am obviously unable to clearly transmit the information. (Sorry, English is my third language.) I will kindly hope that you can find a way to read the page Template talk:NGruev and/or Commons:Разговори/2007 or find a translator or use an automatic translation for the sections in Bulgarian language. Mr Gruev was asked and re-asked more than 6 times and every time he confirmed that he understood the conditions (GFDL) and that he agrees to them. The comment from Commons Admin User:Spiritia from 10:13, 26 August 2007 (UTC) has the "commercial usage" emphasized in bold and italics, and he again re-confirmed this. He doesn't want to change the sign on his website, but we have documented and re-documented his agreement to (re)use his photos under the GFDL, including for commercial usage, here or elsewhere. In the last 10+ years, Mr Gruev has been aware that his pictures are on Wikipedia, we never had any copyvio request or any other problem with his pictures. I really don't see how and why this bothers people here. OTOH, in 2003 he was a retiree, now 11 years later how comfortable is this person with computers and internet? Should we once again harass him to once again ask him to once again re-confirm he understands the GFDL and his agreement? What happens if an author has given permission in the past but for any reason cannot or does not confirm it later? Here on Commons there are Administrators or trusted users who confirm the licenses on the pictures on external websites like Flickr. Can we apply this here? (At the time, I was admin on bg.wiki, Spiritia is admin here on commons and on bg.wiki) Can we use common sense and not paranoia? --5ko 16:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- I've read through all of the discussion over and over, and I've had the discussions translated for me. Gruev gives way too many conditions for the file to be free. You cannot say that it is free here, but not free there. More importantly, you cannot say "1-2 images are free but the rest are not" without identifying which ones are free. Based on what you are saying, he has given someone permission to use 1-2 images on free articles, but does not release certain images, therefore we don't know that he as released images. -- TLSuda (talk) 18:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, per above. There are simply too many conditions/restrictions for these files to be considered as free -FASTILY 09:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TADANO FAUN GmbH (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of advertisement. I think corporate legal department permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:ATF 130G-5.jpg
- File:GR-300EX.jpg
- File:GR-500EX.jpg
- File:GR-600EX.jpg
- File:GR-800EX.jpg
- File:HK 65.jpg
- File:HK 40.jpg
- File:HK 70.jpg
- File:ATF 40G-2.jpg
- File:ATF 50G-3.jpg
- File:ATF 70G-4.jpg
- File:ATF 90G-4.jpg
- File:ATF 110G-5.jpg
- File:ATF 180G-5.jpg
- File:ATF 400G-6.jpg
- File:ATF 220G-5.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Likely uploader by copyright holder, see ticket:2014021910013091, but this is not yet a valid permission. --Krd 17:29, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: these can be restored upon reciept of adequate OTRS permission FASTILY 09:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hauinger Buurefasnacht 2014
[edit]COM:DW these masks and costumes copyright and the German FOP requires the items to be permanently located.
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 05.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 06.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 07.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 11.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 18.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 19.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 22.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 27.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 33.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 34.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 35.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 36.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 37.jpg
- File:Hauinger Buurefastnacht 2014 39.jpg
LGA talkedits 00:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Why a deletion request just against my pictures and not against the thousands of this category? Category:Masks_by_country. Copyright law is relevant if there is a threshold of originality. I don't see this here because (a) some mask are so old (historic, over 100 years) (b) the masks are variation of stereotype so that we have not threshold of originality and so no infringement of a copyright. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Beside of this: masks are IMO similar to clothing. Clothing is protected by trademark law. The copyright gear towards the imitation of other clothing manufacturing. It's not forbidden to make photographs of enrobed persons. And same here with the masks. Masks major feature is to costume and to present them in public places. Photographs of public events are covered by German law. So no problem with masks. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- See COM:COSTUME. If you can show that any of the mask depicted are indeed out of copyright due to age then they can be kept. LGA talkedits 21:50, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Please answer my first question (Why a deletion request just against my pictures and not against the thousands of this category?). Why are you not showing that here is a special copyright? --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Why these and not others is not relevant, as it happens it was this that I came across first that then led me to the category. LGA talkedits 23:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- It´s very well relevant because you seem not to argue on the point. And furthermore you have not one of my arguments disabled. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:25, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- Why these and not others is not relevant, as it happens it was this that I came across first that then led me to the category. LGA talkedits 23:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Please answer my first question (Why a deletion request just against my pictures and not against the thousands of this category?). Why are you not showing that here is a special copyright? --Wladyslaw (talk) 22:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- See COM:COSTUME. If you can show that any of the mask depicted are indeed out of copyright due to age then they can be kept. LGA talkedits 21:50, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- I do not believe that Commons considers clothing to be copyrightable. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:31, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- So what? --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Keep sind wieder die lustigen Lösch......e unterwegs? Wer sich öffentlich macht, und das ist ja gerade der Sinn eines Umzuges, der will ja gerade Aufmerksamkeit auf sich ziehen und wahrgenommen und fotografiert/gefilmt werden. Wenn schon hier das allgemeine Persönlichkeitsrecht nicht greift - was wohl unstrittig sein dürfte - dann gilt das Urheberpersönlichkeitsrecht erst recht nicht. Drollig, die Masken und auch der LA. --ST ○ 20:23, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Germany for non-permanent items FASTILY 09:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MichaelKerrisk as Copyvio (db-f9) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:30, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Content of file talk page: This diagram is a straight copy of Figure 1-1, from page 17 or my book, "The Linux Programming Interface", copyright by myself, and published in 2010 by No Starch press (San Francisco). It is not freely licensed for re-use. (MichaelKerrisk)
- Image was generated using graphviz (i.e. it was not copied verbatim) on the basis of relationship data from the diagram in that book which can be seen here. It was my understanding that that does not constitute coypvio, i.e. it is the same as e.g. coloring regions in new maps on the basis of existing, copyrighted images of maps. If that is not the case, then delete it. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 01:48, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- To say "generated using graphviz (i.e. it was not copied verbatim) on the basis of relationship data" is obfuscation, I'm sorry. This image was copied. The only difference between this diagram and the one in my book is that some boxes have been moved around. Otherwise, the following are exactly the same: the text in each box (even down to the line breaks); the lines used to indicate actual relationships between the boxes (standards), the use of dashed lines between some boxes versus solid lines for others to indicate different types of relationship between the stndards (the use of the two line types is a 1:1 match with my diagram). By your argument, if I took someone's text, which they had written in, say, LibreOffice, copied it into LaTeX, and reordered the paragraphs, then I would not be violating the copyright, because the copying is not "verbatim". To claim this as "your own work" without any mention of its source is disappointing to say the least -- MichaelKerrisk
- The image was generated by Graphviz from a textual script written in DOT language. Graph elements (nodes and edges) were intentionally styled to mimick the one in the book. The layout of the nodes (i.e. what you perceive as box rearrangements) was determined automatically by Graphviz's layout algorithm, and I had not control over it, including the line breaks in node labels. Since the textual format of the DOT script is a creative work by itself, and the generated image is merely a compiled SVG version of the same script, I fail to see how I am not the owner. The text in the boxes is composed of isolated phrases and words that cannot be subject to author copyright. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 08:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - description should mention ISBN 9781593272913 (among others, if applicable) as source for the POSIX API family tree. –Be..anyone (talk) 06:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: interesting case. The relationships themselves seem to be purely factual information, thus not subject to copyright. The line breaks for all boxes except possibly "POSIX.1d" and "POSIX.1j" seem self-evident (i.e.: Name of standard <br> (Year [, Org]) <br> component). For POSIX.1d and 1j, the line breaks seem self-evident because both "Additional real-" and "Advanced real-" take up very nearly the same amount of space as "time extensions". Also, a couple of boxes differ: "XPG4v2" and "SUSv2". I'd say our version looks better laid out and has some arrows that seem to be missing in the original, but the question really is: does the original have enough creative (i.e. non-purely-factual) content that passes the threshold of originality such that our version needs to go? Personally, I don't think so, but perhaps the source should read something like "based on information contained in The Linux Programming Interface by Michael Kerrisk, with a link, and the license changed to {{PD-ineligible}}. My gut says "weak keep", but this is not my area of expertise, so I'm leaving this as just a comment and not a {{Vk}}. Storkk (talk) 10:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 09:35, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
