Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/03/09
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
The images on the screen are copyrighted/fail FOP in UK Flickrworker (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 21:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept, still in use. also no need to delete an old png version Denniss (talk) 22:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Redirect it to File:Flag of Ethiopia (1996–2009).svg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 00:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment -- ColorfulSmoke - This file is in use across many projects and a simple redirect won't fix that. Please replace it before nominating or requesting deletion. We can consider deletion when it's replaced. Also, redirects can be handled via COMMONS:REDIRECT, not on DR. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 16:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Uploader is not owner of copyright in image. 99.250.51.27 00:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe a copyvio from here but there is no proof of who owns the photo. Flickrworker (talk) 20:25, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Uncropped version of File:HMSM Thunderbolt.jpg. Mackensen (talk) 19:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The original from the Imperial War Museum has its own educational value and is useful for reusers who may prefer to use the original or make their own derivatives. --Fæ (talk) 08:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: speedy kept per Fae Denniss (talk) 09:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Philippine flag is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 01:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:57, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Indonesian flag is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 01:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:57, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Israeli flag is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 02:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:57, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Ethiopian flag is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 02:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:58, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Images quite identical : File:Notre Dame 116 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Notre Dame 117 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Notre Dame 118 2012-07-01.jpg. I plan to keep the last one because there is nobody on the foreground of the photo. Tangopaso (talk) 17:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Images quite identical : File:Notre Dame 116 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Notre Dame 117 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Notre Dame 118 2012-07-01.jpg. I plan to keep the last one because there is nobody on the foreground of the photo. Tangopaso (talk) 17:13, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
not my work NordhausenWiki (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request. JuTa 19:39, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. Alan (talk) 22:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete /St1995 17:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 19:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep and suggest speedy close: free licenses may not be revoked. ViperSnake151 (talk) 02:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are irrevocable. If the file is used in other sites, then this is not Commons' problem. I opened the link and got 404 error, so it is not used there anymore. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible licence incompatibility. This image was posted in Flickr two days before beeing posted in Wikipedia: http://www.flickr.com/photos/martinangel68/8343758320/ 186.48.233.243 14:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, the first publication was under copyright, then the uploader decided to publish under a Creative Commons license. That is possible. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:18, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
kept: Per previous close. Natuur12 (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep and suggest speedy close: free licenses may not be revoked. ViperSnake151 (talk) 02:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are irrevocable. If the file is used in other sites, then this is not Commons' problem. I opened the link and got 404 error, so it is not used there anymore. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible licence incompatibility. This image was posted in Flickr two days before beeing posted in Wikipedia: http://www.flickr.com/photos/martinangel68/8343758320/ 186.48.233.243 14:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, the first publication was under copyright, then the uploader decided to publish under a Creative Commons license. That is possible. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:18, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
kept: Per previous close. Natuur12 (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep and suggest speedy close: free licenses may not be revoked. ViperSnake151 (talk) 02:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept, free licenses are irrevocable. If the file is used in other sites, then this is not Commons' problem. I opened the link and got 404 error, so it is not used there anymore. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible licence incompatibility. This image was posted in Flickr two days before beeing posted in Wikipedia: http://www.flickr.com/photos/martinangel68/8343758320/ 186.48.233.243 14:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, the first publication was under copyright, then the uploader decided to publish under a Creative Commons license. That is possible. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:18, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
kept: Per previous close. Natuur12 (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-07T08:20:53 (UTC)
Deleted: It cannot be own work. — Revicomplaint? 08:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-03T21:54:24 (UTC)
Deleted: This seems Copyvio. — Revicomplaint? 08:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
da usuniecia Darpaw (talk) 20:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
user/author no longer wants it to be uploaded for use Newt39 (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jmabel — Revicomplaint? 08:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
user/author no longer wants it available for usage. Newt39 (talk) 20:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jmabel — Revicomplaint? 08:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Image overprinted or watermarked, low resolution despite small size, no metadata, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Too small, no content recognizable Torsch (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Need a microscope to see anything on that image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Arseni Jazenjuk on Maidan greeting the right-wing Swoboda-Party with Hitler-Nazi salute.jpg
[edit]I think the user is not the owner of the picture, when searching the net, I find this page: http://obozrevatel.com/politics/96520-yatsenyuk-perenyal-u-svobodyi-natsistskoe-privetstvie-foto.htm from April 2013, almost one year older than the upload date. And, google translate tells me, that a user "Andrew Gutkovich" published it on facebook.
Wurgl (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
i suggest to contact andrew gutkovich if it was he who posted the photo and if not ask him wether he is willingto give the photo to wiki commons. Otherwise i would think you are trying to censor wiki commons. It seems the correct name is andrey gutkovich, i am trying to contact a person with this name in his facebook profile which is from ucrain.
- Did you read the discussion attached to the picture? Is it possible, that this picture is just a kind of screenshot of a youtube movie? Which then may(!) mean that the context is different and this Andrew (or andrey) Gutkovich just made a screenshot or extracted a single frame from a work of someone else? --Wurgl (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: image from copyright webpage from prior to commons upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Invalid, unused The Haz talk 04:33, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, good riddance, the CC SVG zoo has enough inhabitants, notably CC certains droits reserves.svg: . –Be..anyone (talk) 10:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
small "own work" with a watermark 91.66.63.149 18:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: watermarked image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Apparent screengrab of (probably commercial and copyrighted) television production with insufficient background information to make clear that it is free. If you have the right to upload this under a free license, can you please provide more information? Thank you. (Turkish auto-translation by Google: "Ücretsiz olduğunu net yapmak yeterli arka plan bilgisi ile (muhtemelen ticari ve telif) televizyon üretim Görünür screengrab. Eğer özgür bir lisans altında bu upload hakkı varsa, daha fazla bilgi sağlayabilir miyiz? Teşekkür ederim.") Ubcule (talk) 23:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Shahzaib Jamal (section) Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Apparent screengrab of (probably commercial and copyrighted) television production with insufficient background information to make clear that it is free. If you have the right to upload this under a free license, can you please provide more information? Thank you. (Turkish auto-translation by Google: "Ücretsiz olduğunu net yapmak yeterli arka plan bilgisi ile (muhtemelen ticari ve telif) televizyon üretim Görünür screengrab. Eğer özgür bir lisans altında bu upload hakkı varsa, daha fazla bilgi sağlayabilir miyiz? Teşekkür ederim.") Ubcule (talk) 23:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Shahzaib Jamal (section) Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Apparent screengrab of (probably commercial and copyrighted) television production with insufficient background information to make clear that it is free. If you have the right to upload this under a free license, can you please provide more information? Thank you. (Turkish auto-translation by Google: "Ücretsiz olduğunu net yapmak yeterli arka plan bilgisi ile (muhtemelen ticari ve telif) televizyon üretim Görünür screengrab. Eğer özgür bir lisans altında bu upload hakkı varsa, daha fazla bilgi sağlayabilir miyiz? Teşekkür ederim.") Ubcule (talk) 23:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Shahzaib Jamal (section) Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Apparent screengrab of (probably commercial and copyrighted) television production with insufficient background information to make clear that it is free. If you have the right to upload this under a free license, can you please provide more information? Thank you. (Turkish auto-translation by Google: "Ücretsiz olduğunu net yapmak yeterli arka plan bilgisi ile (muhtemelen ticari ve telif) televizyon üretim Görünür screengrab. Eğer özgür bir lisans altında bu upload hakkı varsa, daha fazla bilgi sağlayabilir miyiz? Teşekkür ederim.") Ubcule (talk) 23:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Shahzaib Jamal (section) Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Apparent screengrab of (probably commercial and copyrighted) television production with insufficient background information to make clear that it is free. If you have the right to upload this under a free license, can you please provide more information? Thank you. (Turkish auto-translation by Google: "Ücretsiz olduğunu net yapmak yeterli arka plan bilgisi ile (muhtemelen ticari ve telif) televizyon üretim Görünür screengrab. Eğer özgür bir lisans altında bu upload hakkı varsa, daha fazla bilgi sağlayabilir miyiz? Teşekkür ederim.") Ubcule (talk) 23:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Shahzaib Jamal (section) Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Apparent screengrab of (probably commercial and copyrighted) television production with insufficient background information to make clear that it is free. If you have the right to upload this under a free license, can you please provide more information? Thank you. (Turkish auto-translation by Google: "Ücretsiz olduğunu net yapmak yeterli arka plan bilgisi ile (muhtemelen ticari ve telif) televizyon üretim Görünür screengrab. Eğer özgür bir lisans altında bu upload hakkı varsa, daha fazla bilgi sağlayabilir miyiz? Teşekkür ederim.") Ubcule (talk) 23:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom.--Rapsar (talk) 08:58, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Shahzaib Jamal (section) Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
No information on who this is means not in scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a modified version (background removed) of a copyright image. Subject appears identical at this site: http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Kim+Novak/La+Venus+la+Fourrure+Premieres+Cannes/JaMR6Rult3r where the image is attributed to Pacific Coast News Risker (talk) 08:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 18:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope, Commons is not private photo gallery TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 08:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope (w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cldesigns). MER-C 12:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Likely a copyright violation, same image available in numerous sources, for example, here (published in July 2013, before being uploaded to Commons) NickK (talk) 00:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
missing legal information Fixertool (talk) 04:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright character. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
self promotion Fixertool (talk) 04:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Used only for vandalism in es.wikipedia. --Taichi (talk) 18:49, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright violation: from the party website, campaign photo dating from 2012 NickK (talk) 01:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
No Exif data, article it's used for is marked for speedy deletion, looks out of scope Mbch331 (talk) 06:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete nonnotable subject TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 06:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
user requested — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djembayz (talk • contribs) 2014-03-08T23:46:15 (UTC)
Kept: There's nothing wrong with this old image, license is correct, part of a series the user uploaded from same book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:25, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Sonu Niga.jpg and unused, out of project scope TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 08:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Incorrect misrepresentative duplicate of File:Whispering Hills LH2.png which is the factual one, thus this one provides no educational content under project scope.. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 06:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Non-free coins, see COM:CUR#Canada.
- File:Canada 1d 2010 Rev.png
- File:Canada 1d 2010 Obv.png
- File:Canada 10c 2010 Rev.png
- File:Canada 50c 2010 Obv.png
- File:Canada 50c 2010 Rev.png
- File:Canada 10c 2010 Obv.png
- File:96 Proof Loonie Rev.png
- File:96 Proof Loonie Obv.png
Stefan4 (talk) 22:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. INeverCry 01:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Promotion account contribution (fr:Utilisateur:Hildaemam).
- File:Fateh Emam portrait.jpg
- File:Portrait Fateh Emam sur le livre L'Amant arabe de Miss Anne.jpg
- File:Cover page of the book L'Amant arabe de Miss Anne.jpg
- File:Fateh-Emam-portrait-Paix-sept2007.jpg
- File:Book Au-delà des mers salées.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, promotional images Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ferozeshaw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Someone's CV and personal photo. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Commons is not your personal free web host.
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lxmoraynia (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence uploader is the copyright holder of the images.
- File:Penny001.jpg
- File:Lxmoraynia009.jpg
- File:Lxmoraynia008.jpg
- File:Lxmoraynia007.jpg
- File:Lxmoraynia006.jpg
- File:Lxmoraynia005.jpg
- File:Lxmoraynia004.jpg
- File:Lxmoraynia002.jpg
- File:Lxmoraynia001.jpg
- File:Lxmoraynia003.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 22:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indianfootballlovers (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion.
- File:Pratik-Shinde-Glaevston-Pirate S-C-USA.JPG
- File:Pratik Shinde Training With Steadfast FC.JPG
- File:Pratik-shinde-gothia-cup.JPG
- File:Indian U-15-Gothia-cup.JPG
- File:Pratik-Shinde-Glaevston-Pirate S-C.JPG
- File:Pratik Shinde.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PARENTELAclaudio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios or out of project scope.
- File:PAINTING864.jpg
- File:PAINTING205.jpg
- File:PAINTING1173.jpg
- File:PAINTING1224.jpg
- File:CLAUDIO-PARENTELA-ITALY(1)S.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 19:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josrvega321 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolutions and missing EXIF. The images are likely not own work.
- File:RafaelMarquezLeón 2014-01-29 14-07.jpg
- File:TorresNiloMEX 2014-01-28 17-00.jpg
- File:TorresNilo2014 2014-01-28 16-59.jpg
- File:LuisGarcia2014 2014-01-28 16-59.jpg
- File:JorgeCampos- 2014-01-28 16-58.jpg
- File:RamonRamirez2014 2014-01-23 21-27.jpg
- File:CruzAzulvsSantosLaguna 2014-01-23 21-25.jpg
- File:Gallovazquez 2014-01-23 17-19.jpg
Jespinos (talk) 20:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ukuléléchriswilson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion.
- File:Ukulele Vietnam 05.jpg
- File:CHRIS WILSON ILLUSION 03.jpg
- File:Chris Wilson Fushigi.jpg
- File:Album GUITARE.jpg
- File:Ukulele Vietnam 04.jpg
- File:Ukulele Vietnam 03.jpg
- File:CHRIS CLOSE UP.2010.jpg
- File:CHRIS WILSON ILLUSION 01.jpg
- File:Ukulele Vietnam.jpg
- File:Ukulele Vietnam 02.jpg
- File:Chris Wilson Magie.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: self-promotional images Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahzaib Jamal (talk · contribs)
[edit]No encyclopedic use - Commons is not Facebook. Uploaded by self-promoting user whose uploads were previously mass-deleted by Denniss (talk · contribs) on 28 Nov 13
JohnCD (talk) 23:06, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Add to that
— Scott • talk 00:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Well spotted. Strictly, those were uploaded by a different account, Shahzab Jamal (talk · contribs), but that is evidently a sock and it is the same guy. Also add:
- JohnCD (talk) 09:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: self-promotional images from two similarly named accounts. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted, fails FOP in Bulgaria and no proof at the user is the owner of the drawing Flickrworker (talk) 23:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted fails FOP in Bulgaria and no proof that user owns copyright Flickrworker (talk) 23:06, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope nonnotable subject. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 03:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyvio ViperSnake151 (talk) 06:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:33, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyvio ViperSnake151 (talk) 06:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Appears to be a photograph of a plan from a piece of paper which therefore is copyrighted and fails FOP in Bulgaria Flickrworker (talk) 23:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 00:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Definite copyvio ViperSnake151 (talk) 06:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible copyvio ViperSnake151 (talk) 06:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Derivative of contemporary sculpture, no FoP in Russia A.Savin 09:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nominator Ymblanter (talk) 03:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
These look unlikely to be own work to me.
- File:Khlidalzaid4.jpg
- File:Khalidalzaid3.jpg
- File:Khalidalzaid2.jpg
- File:Khalidalzaid1.jpg
- File:Khalid alzaid.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 23:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Green Giant (talk · contribs)
[edit]I'm requesting deletion for these files because it appears they are CC BY NC SA and although I was pretty certain the source pages said CC BY SA, there is no archived version of the source websites and therefore I cannot prove they were free for use on the upload date.
- File:Richard Oastler window.jpg
- File:Richard Oastler returning from prison.jpg
- File:Richard Oastler flag.jpg
- File:Richard Oastler memorial in Huddersfield.jpg
Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 02:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader Ymblanter (talk) 03:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zackattack81798 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
Jespinos (talk) 21:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Арсен Дышеков (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-notable person, see also Арсен Дышеков.
Trijnsteltalk 21:49, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 00:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Scope? Fry1989 eh? 01:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Grainy image that I have not found an educational use for. It just doesn't seem to fit in anywhere. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 02:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: Not used anywhere and not likely to be used Mbch331 (talk) 07:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
This appears to be a 2D object (a banner drawn to designate a police station) that would be prohibited under Commons:Freedom of panorama#India. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
This is not a 2D object
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope, not useful in an educational context TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 08:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
A picture weighing 2.48 Mb which is titled: Cane maltese obeso (Obese Maltese dog), and it does not say anything at all ...
I know it's a dog, because has the general features of one: snout, hair, tongue and nose, but other than that, the picture is poor quality: Don´t shows the obesity in the Maltese breed. Don´t shows any characteristics of the breed. It is dark and blurry.
To illustrate the Maltese breed, Commons have high quality photographs and good images about obesity in dogs. This image only clutter, an already cluttered, categorie and has no encyclopedic or educational purpose. —Frei sein (Talk to me!) 08:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-07T08:20:00 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Source unknown, not copyright confirmed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-07T08:23:16 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
If it's the "Rakkhi Bahini Mascot" then the copyright likely belongs to "Rakkhi Bahini" and uploader's claim of own work is doubtful. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 08:38, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-07T08:20:30 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
The picture is very poor quality: Don´t shows any characteristics of the breed and is very blurry.
To illustrate the Maltese breed, Commons have high quality photographs. This image only clutter, an already cluttered, categorie and has no encyclopedic or educational purpose. —Frei sein (Talk to me!) 08:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-07T08:19:15 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Location not identifiable, no clear educational value. darkweasel94 09:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Own work? This file is used on some websites as a movieposter http://www.tineye.com/search/1f72eaa113689463fb8ef902daddb8c520050445/?pluginver=firefox-1.1 91.66.63.149 11:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
"Own work" ??? (small size, no EXIF) 91.66.63.149 11:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Currently no sources 91.66.63.149 12:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused private image Torsch (talk) 12:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Looks like first image in Google search: https://www.google.pl/search?q=Chien+d%27+Artois Might be copied from: http://www.royalcanin.ca/breedsdb/en/dmp_896283115_ArtoisHound/html/gallery/artois_hound_0049.jpg Skrzeczu94 (talk) 12:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 11:32, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:17, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
The picture is protected by copyright. MikaelF (talk) 13:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
non-free logo, no permission Sealle (talk) 14:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
This picture is very poor quality: Don´t shows any characteristics of the breed and is very blurry.
To illustrate the Yorkshire terrier breed, Commons have good quality photographs. This image only clutter, an already cluttered, categorie and has no encyclopedic or educational purpose. —Frei sein (Talk to me!) 14:49, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
This picture is very poor quality.
To illustrate the Yorkshire terrier breed, Commons have good quality photographs. This image only clutter, an already cluttered, categorie and has no encyclopedic or educational purpose. —Frei sein (Talk to me!) 15:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
This picture is very poor quality.
To illustrate the Yorkshire terrier breed, Commons have good quality photographs. This image only clutter, an already cluttered, categorie and has no encyclopedic or educational purpose. —Frei sein (Talk to me!) 15:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
This picture is very poor quality.
To illustrate the Yorkshire terrier breed, Commons have good quality photographs. This image only clutter, an already cluttered, categorie and has no encyclopedic or educational purpose. —Frei sein (Talk to me!) 15:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
No permission. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Alle Daten innerhalb dieser Domain/Site sind urheberrechtlich geschützt und dürfen nicht ohne Zustimmung der Rechteinhaber verwendet werden http://www.omnicommediagroup.de/impressum-omg.html 91.66.63.149 15:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
derivative work 91.66.63.149 15:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
useless without a description 91.66.63.149 15:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
error in filenam, replaced by Katharinenhospital, 020.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
unlikely own work, no permission Krd 16:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
This picture is very poor quality.
To illustrate the Poodle breed, Commons have good quality photographs. This image only clutter, an already cluttered, categorie and has no encyclopedic or educational purpose. —Frei sein (Talk to me!) 16:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC) Ps: There is a duplicate from this image, as well.
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry but:
Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Personal image, out of scope. — Revicomplaint? 12:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
fake licence: soviet magazine cover licensed as uploader's own work Starless (talk) 17:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- I wanted to show Yuri Zvezdniy on the cover of the magazine when he was a child. He was cute! ^_^ Please, dont delete the picture!
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Schematic probably wrong, and is not going to be fixed as the image was never used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.102.20.137 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-09T12:22:12 (UTC)
- Keep. "probably wrong" is not a valid deletion rationale. Please use {{Disputed diagram}} and explain the issue on the talk page.--Wdwd (talk) 20:40, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-03T22:00:15 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-07T08:18:19 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
چون توضیح خاصی ندارد 109.238.187.128 11:15, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-03T21:55:22 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
logo is copyrighted Antemister (talk) 19:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
logo is copyrighted Antemister (talk) 19:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
logo is copyrighted Antemister (talk) 19:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
logo is copyrighted Antemister (talk) 19:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
replaced by corrected file... Antemister (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyrighted/fails FOP in UK Flickrworker (talk) 20:06, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
It appears to be a screenshot from a music video. Jespinos (talk) 20:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but this statue is a recent work of art and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exemption in Kosovo. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Undeleted Kosovo now has FOP. Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Current policy states that self images should be in use in Commons or any of the affiliated Wikipedia projects.Current image is notBoseritwik (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
g8fukfdjyotkjkltjgdiojdiofj 83.45.172.80 20:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Formal portrait matching the one on subject's own business website that does not make any free releases (and does assert copyright back as far as upload year here, so not obviously "they copied us").[1] DMacks (talk) 20:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes this is our own image that we have used for this page. Do we have to do something more to make it comply? Please advise. thanks
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
self promotion Boseritwik (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Users are allowed to upload their own photographs and that is not considered "promotion" as such. The uploader of this image is User:Suraj aaryan which is the name of the file also and is 99.99% user's own image. However, the current policy states that images should be in use in Commons or any of the affiliated Wikipedia projects. As of now, the image is not in use anywhere. Btw, the image is taken at an amusement part called Adventure Island at New Delhi. It's partial logo is seen in the background and the image thus has some encyclopedic value. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
self promotion Boseritwik (talk) 21:44, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Users are allowed to upload their own photographs and that is not considered "promotion" as such. However, the current policy states that images should be in use in Commons or any of the affiliated Wikipedia projects. As of now, the image is not in use anywhere. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused image, small size, missing metadata, description seems to imply a team player of some group ("Russian Tatars") but claimed to be "own work", possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
do usunięcia Darpaw (talk) 20:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
self promotion Boseritwik (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Users are allowed to upload their own photographs and that is not considered "promotion" as such. The uploader of this image is User:Suraj Bharti which is the name of the file also and is 99.99% user's own image. However, the current policy states that images should be in use in Commons or any of the affiliated Wikipedia projects. As of now, the image is not in use anywhere. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
No metadata, small size and resolution, indicated possible COM:COPYVIO. Image is in use on promotional wiki user page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
self promotion Boseritwik (talk) 21:48, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Users are allowed to upload their own photographs and that is not considered "promotion" as such. The uploader of this image is User:Deepika Sharma which is the name of the file also and is 99.99% user's own image. However, the current policy states that images should be in use in Commons or any of the affiliated Wikipedia projects. As of now, the image is not in use anywhere. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Magazine cover for recent publication, likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of the Sibelius Monument (1967), sculpted by Eila Hiltunen (1922–2003) and not in Public domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 20:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- See also previous requests:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jean Sibelius (100505764).jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibeliuksenpääsibeliuspuistossa.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument 2.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument Helsinki.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius Monument in Helsinki.JPG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibelius monument.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sibeliusmonumentti2005.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Sibelius Monument (100484627).jpg
- ––Apalsola t • c 20:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO: Image is from site blacklisted by Wiki... see [http:// www. carnifest. com/events/belgium/brussels/1149/the-klara-festival-2014. aspx ] but remove the extra spaces. Image is sourced to the http://www.klarafestival.be/ website. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Self-promotion, resume, outside of COM:SCOPE. Uploader name is same as subject of resume. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO: Not user's own work, from IMDB here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO, image from [YouTube] and elsewhere promotional image for performer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused image is a probable COM:COPYVIO, image from here, in section labeled "Portfolio". Page is images of this individual by a series of professional photographers. The subject of image does not hold copyright. This image is of small size and no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Personal self-promotion, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Not a selfie, image copyright belongs to photographer, not subject, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:45, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Image can also be found here ErikvanB (talk) 20:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Promotional image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Unclear copyright status, no camera data, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Promotional image, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
No indication that this is user's own work, small size, no metadata, odd edges suggest reprint from another source and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:49, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Possible COM:COPYVIO, no metadata and no indication that this portrait is user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO: Image is video image from YouTube Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Suspect copyvio as there is no proof that it is owned by user and promotional Flickrworker (talk) 20:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 21:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 21:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
no use, better versions available Antemister (talk) 21:13, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 21:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 21:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 21:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 21:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 21:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- This file is given as source for the svg, thus it cannot be deleted. --LPfi (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- A file simply uploaded to Commons is not a source at all. Such images are always taken from flag books or FOTW, you always have to mention those sources.--Antemister (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Subject not recognizable, no educational value. darkweasel94 21:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
no such fictional flags, please Antemister (talk) 21:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep How many times do you need to be told this isn't a valid reason for deletion???? Fry1989 eh? 21:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- A fictional flag is a private artwork and a private artwork is out of scope, as such files cannot be used for educational puprposes and spread wrong information. You can upload them at Flickr and similar websites.--Antemister (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- You have tried to nominate plenty of files in the past under the same reasoning and they are always kept every time because you don't understand this is not a valid reason for deletion. You're obviously never going to get it, but stop wasting everyone's time. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- A fictional flag is a private artwork and a private artwork is out of scope, as such files cannot be used for educational puprposes and spread wrong information. You can upload them at Flickr and similar websites.--Antemister (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use. com:NPOV Natuur12 (talk) 16:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: 1938 bridge, it is unlikely that the architect died before 1945. Eleassar (t/p) 10:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- The engineer was Stanko Dimnik (still active at least as late as in the 1970s). --Eleassar (t/p) 10:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Lower quality version of File:Keluarga Unggung Cahyono Ketika unggung menjabat Kapolda kalimantan Barat- 2014-03-09 09-52.jpg therefore is less in project scope. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Well the other one is deleted as a copyrightviolation so this one has to go as well Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Fæ (talk) 23:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 01:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
logos are copyrighted Antemister (talk) 19:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
The logos are ineligible for copyright. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 19:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- At least in Germany, probably yes. That country has a very high threshold for copyrightability. Keep darkweasel94 20:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Logo's appear to be pd-ineligible Natuur12 (talk) 16:15, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Not so simple geometric shapes, as the template says. It clearly surpass the threshold of originality, and therefore it's copyrighted Sfs90 (talk) 00:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep It contains only a couple of letters, some stars (clearly simple geometric shapes) and a phrase which cannot be copyrighted. (Stop your bias against this newspaper, Copiapino) El Pichilemino (talk) 00:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: I believe that some parts are com:TOO namely the artibutes to illustrate de la costa Natuur12 (talk) 16:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Not only "simple text" logo, it clearly has a design (stripes over "El Expreso") and superposition of "de la costa" indicates originality. Also, the typefont used on "El Expreso" is not a free-use font. Therefore, all copyrights belongs to the authors of the logo Sfs90 (talk) 17:38, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Vendetta because I nominated one of your uploads for deletion? I only see text (letters are not elegible for copyright nowhere, no matter if they were made with a non-free font. Well, to be honest, most fonts are not free. Times New Roman is not free. Comic Sans MS is not free. But the letters are not eligible for copyright. The 'package' is, get it?). "Expreso" has some lines over it, but they are simple lines, not copyrightable. "de la costa" is not copyrighted either by the solely fact of being a bit over the "Expreso" word. I believe this nomination is bordering disruption, because I'm fairly sure you did it because I nommed your Nueva Constitución upload for deletion. Regards, küñall (nütramyen) 01:16, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- It's a pity that you think this nomination is for that reason. The file was nominated and deleted one time before, and because some of the same reasons I gave. At a glance it looks that there's only characters, but the fact that they added some lines and includes the superposition of words above others clearly make the logo more original (it's no more the "only-font" logo, it has a design that denotes originality), and therefore it still have the copyright status over their respective owners. In other way: If you are so interested and worried about adding anything on Wikimedia about Pichilemu (independent of their relevance), why don't you contact the El Expreso de la Costa logo owners and asks them for a permission? That would be an option. If not, the nomination it's still in progress for the reasons given. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 01:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- lol how clueless. This is not the same version I uploaded before, I clearly removed all copyrightable elements. A line definitvely is not copyrightable. It might be "more original" as you denote, but it is still, not copyrightable. Re. the "independent(LY) of their relevance" comment, I have so far not uploaded any original content for a good time, Commons is not a good place to be for my original pictures. küñall (nütramyen) 01:39, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Anyone can see that this isn't the version you uploaded before. That's not the point. The point is the originality in a logo when you alter some things to make a kind of "bad copy" or "bad duplicate" about that. In that case, I can argument that this is not the real logo of the newspaper and therefore is a hoax that it's included on the articles as a true image (a logo that doesn't exist in reality and in the publications). Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 01:46, 18 May 2014 (UTC) PS: what is so funny that you posted LOL to refer to my comment? This is a serious talk page, not a chat. Please maintain the level of the conversation.
- I wrote "lol" because your comments are so basic, buddy. There is no such thing as a "hoax" in this upload. That is not even a correct word to use in this case! The logo was stripped off of copyrightable elements, and that does not make it invalid, in fact. küñall (nütramyen) 01:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Show me your arguments that the "stripping-off" of some elements makes a logo that doesn't exists as a legal version to be published on the articles, saying that it's the logo of the newspaper, even when it's not. That's the point. --Sfs90 (talk) 01:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- I wrote "lol" because your comments are so basic, buddy. There is no such thing as a "hoax" in this upload. That is not even a correct word to use in this case! The logo was stripped off of copyrightable elements, and that does not make it invalid, in fact. küñall (nütramyen) 01:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Anyone can see that this isn't the version you uploaded before. That's not the point. The point is the originality in a logo when you alter some things to make a kind of "bad copy" or "bad duplicate" about that. In that case, I can argument that this is not the real logo of the newspaper and therefore is a hoax that it's included on the articles as a true image (a logo that doesn't exist in reality and in the publications). Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 01:46, 18 May 2014 (UTC) PS: what is so funny that you posted LOL to refer to my comment? This is a serious talk page, not a chat. Please maintain the level of the conversation.
- lol how clueless. This is not the same version I uploaded before, I clearly removed all copyrightable elements. A line definitvely is not copyrightable. It might be "more original" as you denote, but it is still, not copyrightable. Re. the "independent(LY) of their relevance" comment, I have so far not uploaded any original content for a good time, Commons is not a good place to be for my original pictures. küñall (nütramyen) 01:39, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- It's a pity that you think this nomination is for that reason. The file was nominated and deleted one time before, and because some of the same reasons I gave. At a glance it looks that there's only characters, but the fact that they added some lines and includes the superposition of words above others clearly make the logo more original (it's no more the "only-font" logo, it has a design that denotes originality), and therefore it still have the copyright status over their respective owners. In other way: If you are so interested and worried about adding anything on Wikimedia about Pichilemu (independent of their relevance), why don't you contact the El Expreso de la Costa logo owners and asks them for a permission? That would be an option. If not, the nomination it's still in progress for the reasons given. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 01:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
PD-text seems applicable -FASTILY 06:41, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 21:13, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep The SVG is incomplete. Fry1989 eh? 21:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 16:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
having replaced any use, it can be deleted Antemister (talk) 16:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, superseded by File:Naval Ensign of South Africa (1951-1952).svg. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: no evidence that this bridge (presumably built in 1928) is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 10:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Porque no hay licencia de copyright José Federico Tenor (talk) 15:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Porque no hay licencia de copyright José Federico Tenor (talk) 15:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Unreadable, a better version is available File:Les buts de Genèveroule.jpg. Torsch (talk) 18:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 16:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: 1985 bridge, not de minimis. Eleassar (t/p) 09:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 17:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-07T08:57:42 (UTC)
- Well, I can see your point, in that the stylised ending letter would have original quality. I did not think so, while choosing it, as the stylisation is fairly simple. What do others think?--Paracel63 (talk) 11:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Complicated enough for me. — Revicomplaint? 08:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: com:TOO Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
self promotion Boseritwik (talk) 21:45, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Users are allowed to upload their own photographs and that is not considered "promotion" as such. The uploader of this image is User:Lovisuraj which resembles the name of the file also and is 99.99% user's own image. However, the current policy states that images should be in use in Commons or any of the affiliated Wikipedia projects. As of now, the image is not in use anywhere. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Excess Hong Kong MTR map png files
[edit]- File:Mass Transportation Study 1967 zh.png
- File:Shatin-to-Central-Link-Sep-09.png
- File:North-island-eng.png
- File:North-island.png
- File:Mtr-south-island-chinese.png
- File:FutureMTRNetworkAfterMerger2.png
- File:HK SCL merger scheme map.jpg
- File:MTR System Map 2009 zh.png
- File:MIS route map yue.png
- File:MIS route map eng.png
- File:MIS route map.png
- File:MTR System Map.png
- File:Freeman, Fox, Wilbur & Associates - Mass Transportation Study (1967).PNG
- File:Airport Express Line.png
- File:Disneyland Resort Line.png
- File:East Rail Line.png
- File:Island Line.png
- File:Kwun Tong Line.png
- File:Ma On Shan Line.png
- File:Tsuen Wan Line.png
- File:Tung Chung Line.png
- File:West Rail Line.png
Reasons for deletion request -- These files are all raster maps that have SVG alternatives and all are unused, save for a few in Commons galleries, user sandboxes and talk pages. Jc86035 (talk) 05:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jazzycrazy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion.
- File:Dragan Petrovic jazz pianist in concert 2011 Toronto.jpg
- File:Dragan Petrovic jazz pianist in concert 2011 Isabel Bader Theatre.jpg
- File:Dragan Petrovic jazz pianist in Hugh's Room Toronto 2012.jpg
- File:Dragan Petrovic in Toronto 2005.jpg
- File:Dragan Petrovic jazz pianist in New York 2008.jpg
- File:Dragan Petrovic jazz pianist in Boston 2004.jpg
- File:Photomania 808563277.jpg
- File:Photomania 808347319.jpg
- File:Photomania 808332219.jpg
- File:Photomania 808569414.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:58, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: copyrighted bridge. Eleassar (t/p) 11:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Доктор Борменталь (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are all historical items or photographs, so unlikely to be uploader's own work as asserted. also missing essential copyright information such as date of publication or copyright notices, necessary to determine true copyright status of these historical pictures/files.
- File:Geoffrey Trease 2014-03-09 14-34.jpg
- File:Antiferre 2014-03-08 21-05.jpg
- File:Gjjvhasccez 2014-03-04 19-19.jpg
- File:L'agence 2014-03-01 16-52.jpg
- File:Портрет Жака де Келюса кисти Франсуа Кеснеля 2014-02-21 15-25.jpg
TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pramod Karothiya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
use the svg Antemister (talk) 18:52, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- The source for the svg is given as this file, thus this cannot be deleted. --LPfi (talk) 14:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- A file simply uploaded to Commons is not a source at all. Such images are always taken from flag books or FOTW, you always have to mention those sources.--Antemister (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use, in scope etc etc please stop nominating files which are in use Natuur12 (talk) 16:17, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Sajid.mumbai
[edit]Reasons for deletion request -- Self Promotion Boseritwik (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Users are allowed to upload their own photographs and that is not considered "promotion" as such. However, the current policy states that images should be in use in Commons or any of the affiliated Wikipedia projects. As of now, all image are not in use anywhere but File:Salman.jpg is being used at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Salman_toufiq §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: kept one FASTILY 06:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Minsun9107 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope, no useful educational content from just a couple of bars.
TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 06:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Promotional, out of project scope.
- File:Michael Nativel, à la recherche du corbeau blanc.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, le son du jazz-carte blanche.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, la traversée de l'existence.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, gens miam-miam.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, chez monsieur Robert.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, librement inspiré.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, le désert des automates.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, évangile.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, thank you Hollywood.JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (14).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (12).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (11).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (13).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (10).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (8).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (9).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (7).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (5).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (6).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (4).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (3).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (2).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel11.JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (1).JPG
- File:Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, revisité par Michael Nativel (15).JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, 2008, gif sur yvette.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, presse locale 2008 -1.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Ha Oui 2013.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Le Panorama 2010.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, presse locale 2010.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Le Parisien 2012.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Le Républicain.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Chez Monsieur Robert.JPG
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (fr:Utilisateur:M-nativel/Brouillon).
- File:Michael Nativel, au coeur des Ulis.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, à la Daunière.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, mains d'écrivain et de travailleur.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, présentation.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel en pleine écriture.JPG
- File:Lesulis tv.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel, Téléssonne en 2013.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel, écrivant.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel, Téléssonne en 2012.jpg
- File:Gens miam-miam, Cécile Bouillet & Corentin Nativel & Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Chez Monsieur Robert, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Évangile, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Le son du Jazz- Carte Blanche, Didier Gérardin-Michael Nativel.JPG
- File:Librement inspiré, d'après Le Prophète de Khalil Gibran, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Thank you Hollywood, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Le désert de automates, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:À la recherche du corbeau blanc, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:La traversée de l'existence, Michael Nativel.jpg
- File:Michael nativel.JPG
- File:Photo de l'auteur ulisssien.jpg
- File:Gardien du château de Ballainvilliers.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel pour la presse locale, 2008.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel pour la presse locale, année 2008.JPG
- File:Michael Nativel pour la presse locale, 2010.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel pour le journal Le Parisien, 2012.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel pour le journal Le Républicain, 2012.jpg
- File:Michael Nativel.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:25, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the postcard shows the unveiling of Prešeren Monument, which is still copyrighted (the sculptor died in 1952). Eleassar (t/p) 18:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 05:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Slovenia: the photo shows the unveiling of a monument that is partly (pedestal) copyrighted to Max Fabiani (d. 1962). Not yet in the public domain. TadejM (t/p) 08:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep COM:De minimis. —holly {chat} 18:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The depiction of the pedestal in the overall photograph is de minimis. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
somebody is hacking my facebook profile under self employed catagory. they downloaded this taxi to play a joke on me Kpeilll (talk) 21:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep In scope, and to my knowledge, this DR makes no sense. Also this file is i use in pl.wiktionary.org in "تاکسی" article and in zh.wikipedia.org in "自僱" article. Tm (talk) 00:58, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 16:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
IS NOT MY IMAGEM, LIES - DELETE PLEASE AND OUT IN MY FACEBOOK 189.122.144.78 22:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep For the second time this file is in scope, and to my knowledge, this DR makes, again, no sense, and it appears to me that someone is trying to make with this DR . Also this file is i use in pl.wiktionary.org in "تاکسی" article and in zh.wikipedia.org in "自僱" article
kept: File is in use. ~ Nahid Talk 21:44, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
gehört nicht mir! 89.217.183.239 18:33, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Das ist nicht von mir,weg damit! 89.217.183.239 18:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Thrid non-sense and vandalical DR. File is in use and in scope. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Files uploaded by RiceRickies (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RiceRickies (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: YouTube screenshots of questionable notability. Not necessary to illustrate subject.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Kartalkaya Turkiye 2011.jpg
- File:FIS Race PGS Erzurum Turkiye 2010.JPG
- File:Ozan Yılmaz.jpg
- File:Didem Akın Kupa.png
- File:Didem Akın Fenerbahçe Bayan Basket Menajeri.jpg
- File:Didem Akın ve Ailesi.png
- File:Didem Akın Fenerbahçe Bayan Basketbol Şampiyonluk.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by REPRESENTATE (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
- File:Oscar Hernan Gil EN ARGENTINA.jpg
- File:Oscar Hernan Gil DT.jpg
- File:Oscar Hernan Gil Director Tecnico.jpg
- File:Oscar Hernan Gil Deportivo Lara Director Tecnico.jpg
- File:Oscar Hernan Gil Colombia 2006.jpg
- File:Oscar Hernan GIl Clinica Japon 2007.jpg
- File:Oscar Hernan Gil Boca Junior vs Zamora.jpg
- File:Oscar Hernan Gil Boca Junior Argentina 2004-2009.jpg
- File:Oscar Hernan Gil 4.jpg
- File:Oscar Hernan Gil conferencista.jpg
- File:Oscar Hernan Gil soccer nation.jpg
- File:Oscar Hernan Gil entrenador de futbol.jpg
- File:Oscar Gil toma las riendas.jpg
- File:Oscar Gil sera el nuevo lider de Lara.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 06:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of User:Dinesh Meena92
[edit]- File:Dcm in skr.jpg
- File:Dcm sir aap.jpg
- File:Dcm @ avm.jpg
- File:Dcm in baswara tour.jpg
- File:Dcm sir @tripura mandir.jpg
- File:Dcm sir @ tripura sundari.jpg
- File:Dcm @ baswara.jpg
- File:श्री दिनेष चन्द मीणा (5).jpg
- File:DCM Sir As Guest with anil lodha,mahaendra surana.jpg
- File:Dcm sir in mumbai.jpg
- File:DCM Sir,Producer.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Dinesh Meena92. I believe they should be deleted because wikicommons is not a family album for unimportant people. Boseritwik (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Not all images are un-encyclopedic. For example, the File:Dcm sir @tripura mandir.jpg is an image of Tripura Sundari temple at Banswara, Rajasthan. Some other images might also be useful like, File:Dcm in baswara tour.jpg, File:Dcm sir @ tripura sundari.jpg, File:Dcm @ baswara.jpg §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Mixed: Kept some, deleted some. Natuur12 (talk) 16:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
In general the photographer is the only copyright holder and the only person who can grant the permission to use the image one way or the other. And since in this case the photographer is unknown than I am not sure who did you get permission from. I think we need OTRS from the photograper. Jarekt (talk) 03:35, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- It is clearly stated on the source website that the website holds copyright on the image. They then grant permission to reproduce it, so long as they are credited, with a link to their site. If you are right that the unknown photographer holds copyright, this means that the website itself is making a false claim. Are we to assume then that the website is wrong, and that they themselves have no right to use this image, let alone claim copyright on it? If they are right, on the other hand, there should be no problem in reproducing it here.--Lexipenia (talk) 10:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Although the Google translation is messy, it says that Internet users may usse the image as you say. Print, CD, DVD, etc. users must get permission. That is not the free license that Commons requires. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Esta imagen es una mala copia del retrato del 3er duque de Alba por Antonio Moro. No es su abuelo el 1er duque de Alba como dice el título de la imagen. Crea confusión y error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parair (talk • contribs) 2014-03-09T11:11:56 (UTC)
Esta imagen es una mala copia del retrato del 3er duque de Alba por Antonio Moro. No es su abuelo el 1er duque de Alba como dice el título de la imagen. Crea confusión y error. Parair (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
DELETED|but actually I reverted to previous version. This is the uploader's request on uploading day: erroneously uploaded file with name, which was in use. Taivo (talk) 13:28, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Fue todo un error. Ya revertí yo el cambio subiendo el auténtico retrato Real portrait of 1st Duke of Alba.--Parair (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, I do not understand Spanish at all and Google translator does not work in my computer. I do not understand, what is wrong. I re-opened the request. Taivo (talk) 15:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, I do not understand english at all and Google translator does not work in my computer. I do not understand, what is wrong. I re-opened the request. --Parair (talk) 19:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, I do not understand Spanish at all and Google translator does not work in my computer. I do not understand, what is wrong. I re-opened the request. Taivo (talk) 15:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Fue todo un error. Ya revertí yo el cambio subiendo el auténtico retrato Real portrait of 1st Duke of Alba.--Parair (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: I'm not sure what is intended here, but it seems clear that this is not a problem that requires deletion -- A rename, I think. Deleted. This is a reversed, B&W, poor quality crop of File:Anthonis Mor 020.jpg. I can see no reason to keep it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
no such fictional flags, please Antemister (talk) 21:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep How many times do you need to be told this isn't a valid reason for deletion???? Fry1989 eh? 21:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- A fictional flag is a private artwork and a private artwork is out of scope, as such files cannot be used for educational puprposes and spread wrong information. You can upload them at Flickr and similar websites.--Antemister (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- You have tried to nominate plenty of files in the past under the same reasoning and they are always kept every time because you don't understand this is not a valid reason for deletion. You're obviously never going to get it, but stop wasting everyone's time. Fry1989 eh? 16:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- A fictional flag is a private artwork and a private artwork is out of scope, as such files cannot be used for educational puprposes and spread wrong information. You can upload them at Flickr and similar websites.--Antemister (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
no fictional flags, please Antemister (talk) 21:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep How many times do you need to be told this isn't a valid reason for deletion???? Fry1989 eh? 21:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- A fictional flag is a private artwork and a private artwork is out of scope, as such files cannot be used for educational puprposes and spread wrong information. You can upload them at Flickr and similar websites.--Antemister (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- You have tried to nominate plenty of files in the past under the same reasoning and they are always kept every time because you don't understand this is not a valid reason for deletion. You're obviously never going to get it, but stop wasting everyone's time. Fry1989 eh? 16:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- A fictional flag is a private artwork and a private artwork is out of scope, as such files cannot be used for educational puprposes and spread wrong information. You can upload them at Flickr and similar websites.--Antemister (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal art is not welcome and fictional flags just confuse. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Invention by a blocked user known for similar works. --Chricho (talk) 22:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- I know Shikku27316 for more than a year, I deliberately vectorized some of his works, including this. The bitmap original was deleted. It is still present at deviantART, so presence at Commons is not necessary. PS: This is too Shikku27316's work vectorized by me, but it is used at Russian Wikiversity. What is it's destiny? Hosmich (talk) 14:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal art. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Donbass Arena
[edit]No FOP in the Ukraine
- File:Euro 2012. Donetsk. 2012-06-09. P6190023.JPG
- File:Euro 2012. Donetsk. 2012-06-09. P6190024.JPG
- File:Komsomol's park in Donetsk 25.jpg
- File:Komsomol's park in Donetsk 26.jpg
- File:Steinkugel vor der Donbass Arena in Donezk, Ukraine (2).jpg
Flickrworker (talk) 22:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- On File:Euro 2012. Donetsk. 2012-06-09. P6190023.JPG, File:Euro 2012. Donetsk. 2012-06-09. P6190024.JPG sculpture is not main object of the photo. It is photo of Wikipedian. So it is DM.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:13, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- TBF I won't call it that. For me the sculpture dominates the picture, and yes I agree that the man is the subject. Flickrworker (talk) 22:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Donbas Arena kugel ball and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Donbas Arena. LGA talkedits 08:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Keep for this one. It is a very simple structure which cannot be protected by copyright (I disagree here with Jim's opinion). {{PD-ineligible}} and {{PD-shape}} do apply and I doubt that it could be protected by copyright in the US either. --High Contrast (talk) 17:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in Ukraine. These buildings/sculptures are not within PD-shape FASTILY 07:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)