Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/03/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_krystal.jpg){kind=link}
_jeyka.jpg){kind=link}
_2014-03-08_04-23.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_--_Front.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Está repetida. NortenhaPVZ (talk) 23:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- @NortenhaPVZ: No entiendo. ¿Dónde está la otra foto a que haces referencia? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Eu carreguei uma nova imagem com a mesma finalidade. NortenhaPVZ (talk) 03:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Troquei este ficheiro por este https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Covinha.JPG NortenhaPVZ (talk) 10:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:25, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
I am the creator, and meant to create a category. Bagumba (talk) 06:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: In the future, please use {{Speedy}} -- it uses less human and computer resources. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Está repetida. NortenhaPVZ (talk) 23:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- @NortenhaPVZ: No entiendo. ¿Dónde está la otra foto a que haces referencia? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Eu carreguei uma nova imagem com a mesma finalidade. NortenhaPVZ (talk) 03:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Troquei este ficheiro por este https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Covinha.JPG NortenhaPVZ (talk) 10:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:25, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused private image Torsch (talk) 10:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: speedy closed, used in bgWP — billinghurst sDrewth 10:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Not likely that uploader owns the copyright in the image. 99.250.51.27 23:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 20:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Somali flag is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 18:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:58, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:PORN and possible copyvio, low-res photograph of genitalia Rybec (talk) 03:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, low quality vulva. Taivo (talk) 16:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:PORN and possible copyvio, low-res photograph of genitalia Rybec (talk) 03:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, low quality vulva. Taivo (talk) 16:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
not needed anymore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frze (talk • contribs) 2014-03-07T20:23:37 (UTC)
Deleted: obsolete unused redirect JuTa 20:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
This flag is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 02:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, redundant to File:Flag of Venezuela (state).svg. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
_krystal.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_krystal.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a publicity image for Korean drama The Heirs. So it is copyrighted to Seoul Broadcasting System. This image also can be easily found on Google images. Leedkmn (talk) 18:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
_krystal.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: http://www.mediaus.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=37060 copyvio — Revicomplaint? 12:42, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
_krystal.jpg){kind=link}
copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neoalpha (talk • contribs) 2014-03-06T01:25:36 (UTC)
Deleted: This cannot be own work of user. — Revicomplaint? 12:16, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FandeLZ2000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]taken from internet
- File:Quien-mato-a-patricia-soler-itati-cantoral-miguel-de-miguel-rti.jpg
- File:ItatiCantoralPhotFile.jpg
- File:2849455 249px.jpg
- File:Miguel de Miguel 187 fotograf aLuisCastilla.jpg
INeverCry 21:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete also File:Bf5kQdXCIAAg9YZ.jpg, which is small photo without metadata and with watermark of TV-channel. Now are all the uploader's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Bad quality modern painting of unknown person by unknown author. Out of SCOPE. Not in use. From the user with 1 edit. Shakko (talk) 14:25, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
_jeyka.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_jeyka.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
_jeyka.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
_jeyka.jpg){kind=link}
A portrait of the uploader? (unused) 91.66.63.213 10:47, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope — Revicomplaint? 07:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
unused user portrait 91.66.63.213 08:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Claimed to be "own work" of the uploader, who scanned the image in 2009 and then "released it into the public domain". This is not valid of course, scanning a photo does not make you its author. As there is virtually no information about the photograph's author and the year it was taken, it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 11:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
No indication that uploader is copyright owner. 99.250.51.27 22:47, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Delete, clearly randomly taken from the internet. Dantadd✉ 16:57, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of scope: Serves no educational purpose Mbch331 (talk) 20:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope (w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The Almighty E A SKI). MER-C 13:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
useless due to heavy blur. There are lots of better pictures of the T300 mr.choppers (talk)-en- 15:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright issues- haven't asked the photographer/not put names 213.66.223.223 11:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission — Revicomplaint? 07:57, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused private image Torsch (talk) 10:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kashmiri as no license. I just restored the {{PD-self}} license. Kashmiris reason was:No licence. This is NOT PD-self as wrongly mentioned by the uploader. This is government insignia and needs a proper licence tag. Please update. JuTa 09:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Keep All elements are too simple. Fry1989 eh? 19:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Simple logo for me. — Revicomplaint? 07:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Either an unused private image or a copyvio (description translates to "Taken from the official website of the contractor.") Torsch (talk) 10:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused private image Torsch (talk) 10:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused private image Torsch (talk) 10:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal image.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:04, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 13:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: real source — Revicomplaint? 08:04, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Ineligible CC license for upload to Commons Fish storm (talk) 10:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope, picture of dubious origin as well no exif data; person's article was removed due to lack of encyclopedic relevance on nl-wiki MoiraMoira (talk) 10:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
maybe copyvio, better solutions in the internet. even if not: unused personal picture Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
The image is associated with a magazine article whose print version was published on September 28, 2007. See http://www.puntofinal.cl/648/bolivia.htm. Jespinos (talk) 00:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Author is Piet Zwart, not MOTI. Piet Zwart died 1977, so image is not free. Image was made for Nederlandse Kabel Fabriek, so rights may lie there? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 11:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of project scope Leitoxx 17:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
_2014-03-08_04-23.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2014-03-08_04-23.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot of movie. No licence notification. -Bergfalke2 (talk) 15:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
_2014-03-08_04-23.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
_2014-03-08_04-23.jpg){kind=link}
Are all the individual frames own work? -mattbuck (Talk) 01:40, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Decoration for a festival in Germany, not permanently located here. German FOP therefore does not apply. Derivative of a copyrighted work, permission by original artist required. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 11:04, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- OK, you are right. No objections, --Don Manfredo (talk) 20:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: — Revicomplaint? 07:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Sports logo, possibly not self-created. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Author is Lidewij Edelkoort, not MOTI. She is still living, so image is not free. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 11:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 12:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:53, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 12:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Private image which is not used on any Wikimedia project - very likely not useful for educational purposes. See also Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not your personal free web host. High Contrast (talk) 12:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
The leftside of this logo is not simple text. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Unless personal images are used, they are generally outside COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Duplicate to File:Escudo-Wilstermann.png (better quality). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:09, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:House of flags
[edit]Fails FOP for the UK
- File:House Of Flags Australia.jpg
- File:House Of Flags Close look.jpg
- File:House Of Flags close up.jpg
- File:House Of Flags UK.jpg
- File:House Of Flags.jpg
Flickrworker (talk) 12:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Question Is it known what happened to this after the games ? LGA talkedits 01:47, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- No idea. Probably on the The Bartlett School of Architecture campus or one assumes will reappear on the Olympic park at some point. Same could be said of all the temp stuff in London, we don't know! Flickrworker (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails FOP for UK. LGA talkedits 20:09, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom — Revicomplaint? 07:58, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Location barely identifiable, no clear educational value. darkweasel94 23:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 03:57, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Claimed to be PD-Poland, which is only applicable to photographs - but this is a drawing, not a photograph. Also claimed to be Anonymous-EU, but I don't see any documented research to determine if the author of this drawing is really "unknown" in a legal sense or if, which seems more likely to me, the uploader simply didn't bother to find out. Rosenzweig τ 11:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 03:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted (No COM:FOP in Russia) ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: the law was signed by the president, will be in force from Oct 1, it is easier to keep Ymblanter (talk) 03:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MariaFValverde (talk · contribs)
[edit]Is there a little chance that someone will use these files in the next years and if yes: Please add some categories
- File:Accessibilitas crossing4.png
- File:Accessibilitas crossing1.png
- File:Accessibilitas crossing3.png
- File:Accessibilitas crossing2.png
- File:Accessibilitas pharmacy.png
91.66.63.213 10:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope — Revicomplaint? 07:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
promotional, out of scope
Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 03:32, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.
- File:Dwight Bell 06.JPG
- File:Dwight Bell 04.JPG
- File:Dwight Bell 05.JPG
- File:Dwight Bell 03.JPG
- File:Dwight Bell 01.JPG
- File:Dwight Bell 02.JPG
- File:Dwight Bell.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:AVANT Drive-In-Show 1983 Gabrielle Bryers Gallery.jpg
- File:AVANT-poster-fried.jpg
- File:AVANT Bus-stop shelter.jpg
- File:AVANT show 1982 David Fried.jpg
- File:AVANT with Hambleton.jpg
- File:AVANT-streetart-1980s-nyc-DF.jpg
- File:1982 david fried soho gallery show.jpg
- File:AVANT Drive-In-Show 1983 04-GrandStreet 3px.jpg
- File:AVANT-painting street art 1980s.jpg
- File:Avant street art 1982.jpg
- File:AVANT street art 1980s nyc.jpg
- File:AVANT bus-stop shelter street art-1980s..jpg
- File:01 AVANT Drive-In-Show 1983 street art nyc sm.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Managehotel (talk · contribs)
[edit]All promotional content taken from http://www.goldentuliprosakhutor.com/, no info on author/permission
- File:Гостиница Голден Тюлип Роза Хутор в Красной Поляне, Сочи.jpg
- File:Golden Tulip Rosa Khutor Hotel, Красная Поляна, Сочи.jpg
- File:Номер Люкс в отеле Golden Tulip Rosa Khutor, Красная Поляна, Сочи.jpg
- File:Лобби гостиницы Golden Tulip Rosa Khutor в Красной Поляне, Сочи.jpg
- File:Гостевой номер в гостинице Golden Tulip Rosa Khutor в Красной Поляне, Сочи.jpg
- File:Конференц-зал Эйндховен в отеле Golden Tulip Rosa Khutor.jpg
- File:Конференц-комната в гостинице Tulip Inn Rosa Khutor, Красная поляна, Сочи.jpg
- File:Гостиница Tulip Inn Rosa Khutor в Красной Поляне, Сочи.jpg
- File:Номер Люкс в гостинице Tulip Inn Rosa Khutor, Красная Поляна, Сочи.jpg
- File:Tulip Inn Omega Sochi hotel.jpg
- File:Tulip Inn Rosa Khutor Hotel Snow View.jpg
- File:Tulip Inn Rosa Khutor Hotel View from Mzymta Enbankment.jpg
- File:Golden Tulip Rosa Khutor Hotel Facade.jpg
- File:Golden Tulip Rosa Khutor Hotel view from Mzymta Enbankment.jpg
- File:Golden Tulip Rosa Khutor Hotel view from Mzymta River.jpg
- File:IFK Hotel Management.jpg
A.Savin 12:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leisure17expert (talk · contribs)
[edit]Those files seem to be not own work as claimed, but instead taken from web pages like http://www.leisure17.de/uber-die-leisure-17/, http://www.holger-buhr.de/leisure17.html and http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=4141, where they appeared before their upload here. Unless the uploader confirms his authorship convincingly to OTRS, the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
Rosenzweig τ 15:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
These logos of a student radio station are over the threshold of originality, and it's highly likely the uploader doesn't have the right to release them under a free license. Therefore they can't be hosted on Commons.
User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 03:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files of Tarek chowdhury (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Toy cat..jpeg
- File:Cute girl with duck..jpg
- File:Sea turtle..jpg
- File:Cat with dog.jpg
- File:Group of dog.jpg
- File:Nice & Cute pet kissing.jpg
- File:Romance with Cute-Pets.jpg
- File:Nice & Cute-pets.jpg
- File:Loving Cute-pets.jpg
- File:Pet cat.jpg
- File:Awesome cute pet.jpg
- File:Cute pet pictures.jpg
- File:Cute dog picture.jpg
- File:Eye cat.jpg
I am also nominating the rest of the pictures uploaded by this user. This user was warned previously not upload copyrighted material, and I think did it again, only this time its said the pictures are own work, which is hard to believe, as some of the images lack EXIF file and others have, but it's always different. Finally, I have made a random search with TinEye, and appear entries in various media (including commercial sites that claim copyrights).—Frei sein (Talk to me!) 07:29, 8 March 2014 (UTC) Ps: Yesterday, I already nominated one image upload from this user, because in the lower right corner has the watermark from a web that specializes in wallpaper pics. I did not know I could do a mass deletion request, so I do now. :P
Deleted: INeverCry 03:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook.
- File:David-Warburton.jpg
- File:David John Warburton.jpg
- File:David Warburton.jpg
- File:David-Warburton-3.jpg
- File:David Warburton 2.JPG
- File:DavidJWarburton.JPG
- File:David J Warburton.JPG
- File:David John Warburton.JPG
- File:David Warburton.JPG
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:10, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luis Argueta Reyes (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:I love you Sister 2014-03-06 15-24.jpg
- File:Aquí en el trabajo con una de mis compañeras 6-3-14 2014-03-06 15-22.jpg
- File:Aquí limpiando después de una de las grandes tormentas de Nieve--- 2014-03-06 15-21.jpg
- File:Aquí con mi amigota celebrando el día de la amistad en otro lugar-- Hahaha 2014-03-06 14-47.jpg
- File:Aquí celebrando el día del Amor y la amistad el 2-14-14 2014-03-06 14-45.jpg
- File:Como Yo quisiera comprender a este muchacho pero no puedo, no lo entiendo--- 2014-03-06 14-44.jpg
- File:Disfrutando del cumpleaños de mi amiga--- 2014-03-06 12-29.jpg
- File:Cuando andaba visitando Allentow, PA 2014-03-06 12-28.jpg
- File:Cuando andaba de party el sábado 1-3-14 2014-03-06 12-26.jpg
Stemoc (talk) 02:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kevindanimusic (talk · contribs)
[edit]More Kevin Dani.
- File:Kevindani auto.jpg
- File:Kevindani firma.jpg
- File:Kevindani mar adentro.jpg
- File:KevinDani 01.jpg
- File:KevinDani 02.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anisur Alam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (es:Usuario:Kevindanimusic).
- File:KevinDani CD.jpg
- File:KevinDani 5.jpg
- File:Kevin Dani 4.jpg
- File:Kevin Dani 3.jpg
- File:Kevin Dani 1.jpg
- File:Kevin Dani 2.jpg
- File:Kevin Dani.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Operador8501 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE. Promotion account contribution.
- File:Mistrecordslogo2.PNG
- File:Horror House Face.JPG
- File:4th Reich Front.jpg
- File:HH-logo.JPG
- File:Horror House Logo.JPG
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: self-promotion, company adversting
- File:Melvin Hade 12.3 Blue.jpeg
- File:Melvin Hade 12.3 Dark Blue.jpg
- File:Moeda Wear Indonesia Logo.png
- File:Moeda Wear Logo.png
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should use SVG format if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Cedrek's answer
[edit]I made these files for a wiki i created for an association. I chose Wikimedia commons instead of a pic's host. Can you explain me if i did a mistake?
Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guillermo Lopetegui (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion (es:Usuario:Guillermo Lopetegui).
- File:Guillermo Lopetegui Uruguay.JPG
- File:Ultimo Reducto.jpg
- File:Serias Picardías.jpg
- File:El parque de los últimos regresos.jpg
- File:Los Reflejos en la Noche.jpg
- File:Brujas de aqui nomas.jpg
- File:Crepusculo de los cautivos.jpg
- File:El Rostro de Margara Shaw.jpg
- File:Mercosur Literario.jpg
- File:Guillermo Lopetegui.JPG
- File:La Esperanza y su Sombra.jpg
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rahulbhatnagar261286 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Siegertyp2013 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:RS1.jpg
- File:CS010grau-3.jpg
- File:XA schwarzfrontpoliert seitlich ohneHintergrund.png
- File:CH100titan-3.jpg
- File:12-Lackieren 3.jpg
- File:Abstrecken 2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Dubious origin of files. Many are available on external web sites ([1] and others). Suspected copyright violation.
A.Savin 12:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raja Doly Hutabarat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roshan myanmar kamaing (talk · contribs)
[edit]All unused personal images. See COM:EDUSE.
- File:Tara Bkk from mogok photo Thai mandir.jpg
- File:Kamaing from Roshan Pokharel toisanyang.jpg
- File:Roshan myanmar kamaing namaty.jpg
- File:Roshan kamaing ကာမိုင်းမြို့.jpg
- File:Roshan kamaing tulase ram bandare kamaing toisanyang ကာမိုင်းမြို့.jpg
- File:Kamaing ramparsad and soma ကာမိုင်းမြို့ ထွယ်ဆန်ယန့် ရပ်ကွက်.jpg
- File:ကာမိုင်း ဦးရမ်ပါရ်ဆပ်+ ဆိုမှာ သား ရိုဆန်း+သာရာ.jpg
- File:Tara myanmar mogok live in Thailand krabi.jpg
- File:Roshan myanmar कामाई पयानाला.jpg
- File:Roshan krabi kamaing.jpg
- File:Chandra Narayan kamaing.jpg
- File:Januka Narayan Pokharel kamaing.jpg
- File:Kamaing.jpg
- File:Roshan myanmar kamaing toisanyang.jpg
- File:Roshan Pokharel.jpg
- File:Roshan myanmar Pokharel.jpg
- File:Roshan myanmar kamaing.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tomvas tomvas (talk · contribs)
[edit]advertisement
- File:Tablouri canvas personalizate - digital painting în Photoshop.jpg
- File:Tablouri canvas cu fotografia ta.jpg
- File:Tablouri canvas moderne.jpg
- File:Tablouri Canvas.jpg
Ray Garraty (talk) 11:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:42, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Looks like this is not own work; lack of exif info; bigger images available, for example @ [2] or [3] 195.241.192.123 11:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Per com:FOP#Spain. There is no fop for temporarily instalations in Spain and according to the discribtion this work of art has moved at least ones to a diffrent location and it looks quite movable so I don't think this is covered by FOP. Natuur12 (talk) 13:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. This is a temporary installation. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
not used, not suitable for Commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bioneer1 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-04T11:37:25 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 12:22, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not used, not relevant to Commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bioneer1 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-03T14:44:17 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 12:24, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Dubious own work: credited to someone else at w:File:ASI Art Gallery logo.gif. Stefan4 (talk) 22:29, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Self promotional hoax. The award being held is not a grammy (see File:Grammy.jpg for what a grammy looks like). The image is taken off the subjects' website, is only used by the subjects en.wiki page, both the image and the en.wiki page were created by single purpose accounts. The grammy claim was originally in the en.wiki article but was removed some time ago. Kaimahi (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Natuur12 (talk) 14:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Es una imagen antigua. Actualmente el logotipo e imagen de Halcourier no es éste — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cristina Wizyu (talk • contribs) 2014-03-03T08:56:00 (UTC)
Deleted: Uplaoder changed his mind shortly after uploading the file Natuur12 (talk) 14:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Created for trolling purposes using the Newspaper Clipping Generator, which also does not appear to license generated images via a Commons-compatible license. 99.118.34.43 21:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oops, looks like it was deleted as I was creating this request. Please close and disregard. Thank you. --99.118.34.43 21:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Alan. — Revicomplaint? 08:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of content protected by copyright A.Savin 12:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
A.Savin, если следовать вашей логике, то вам необходимо удалить все ваши снимки, которые нарушают авторское право. Например фото архитектуры или дерева. Вам Создатель дерева дал разрешение на фотографию его творения? Или архитектор?.. Ivanaivanova (talk) 21:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Вы уж извините, уважаемая г-жа Иванова, но ваши каменты свидетельствуют о полном незнании лицензионной политики Викисклада, а также о нежелании освоить оную. Вам следовало бы грузить ваши творения где-нибудь на фликре. --A.Savin 22:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Согласно правилам лицензионной политики Викисклада вам пора удалить и ваши работы! Разве нет? Ivanaivanova (talk) 23:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Прямо так и все пять тысяч штук что-то нарушают? Что ж, если хотите побыть святее римского папы, то карты вам, как говорится, в руки... --A.Savin 23:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Вы сами подумайте: мне это надо? За державу обидно! Пусть люди смотрят, радуются... Ivanaivanova (talk) 18:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Бред! За державу обидно - да, но скорее из-за тотального игнорирования авторских прав в оной. И вообще не понимаю, о чем тут дискуссия. Вас я не виню в систематическом нарушении. Ваши фотографии Сочи - крайне полезны для проекта. Но фотки с экрана зомбоящика, мониторов трансляции, сканы газет, журналов,... - здесь всегда удалялись и будут удаляться. Обсуждать ровным счетом нечего. --A.Savin 19:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: As A. Savin says, there is nothing to disucss here. It is completely clear that the video has a copyright and that this image infringes on it. The IOC is well known for very aggressively defending its IP rights. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
not used, meanless — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bioneer1 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-07T14:05:42 (UTC)
Agree. Not useful, just the word "Archivo" in a plain sans-serif font. Wurstmaster (talk) 20:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 12:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
_--_Front.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_--_Front.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
awful quality, glare and weird colors all around mr.choppers (talk)-en- 05:35, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
_--_Front.JPG){kind=link}
- Ubcule's edit was an improvement, but the original didn't give them much to work with. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 05:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'd agree that even the "fixed" version was a borderline case, lens flare is bad because the quick and easy tricks one can generally use to massively improve a mediocre image also end up exaggerating the flare.
- I had another quick go at retrieving this one for the sake of it (the "current" version as of 17:32, 8 March), but it's quite processed looking. Ubcule (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
_--_Front.JPG){kind=link}
Own work is claimed, but no Exif data present Mbch331 (talk) 21:17, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Small size, low resolution and lack of camera data make this unlikely to be user's own work, and instead a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:06, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bioneer1 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-05T23:50:53 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 12:22, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Screenshot from non-free website ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded by a newbie by mistake during a Wikiproject in classroom. Please delete it. They will upload again once we have the right permissions Kippelboy (talk) 07:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Non-free artwork visible (no COM:FOP in Russia) ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:30, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:34, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Non-free artwork visible (no COM:FOP in Russia) ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- В вашей ссылке написана ложь. По ГК РФ ст. 1296:
Допускаются без согласия автора или иного правообладателя и без выплаты вознаграждения воспроизведение и распространение изготовленных экземпляров, сообщение в эфир или по кабелю, доведение до всеобщего сведения произведения изобразительного искусства или фотографического произведения, которые постоянно находятся в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, за исключением случаев, когда изображение произведения является основным объектом использования либо когда изображение произведения используется в целях извлечения прибыли.
Chan-Fan 10:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: 1296 permits non-commerical use. Commons requires tat images be free for all use, including commercial use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Dubious copyright claim. The uploader, a single-purpose-account focused on the subject, claims the image as their own work. The image is a mediocre scan of a printed photo lifted from the subjects' website. It seems unlikely that the original photo, the print and the scan were all the work of the same party (if they were it would be easier to just upload the original photo). If the three are not all the work of the same party, then the uploaders claim of 'own work' is incorrect. Kaimahi (talk) 20:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:15, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
not needed anymore because File:Dresden General view ca. 1975.JPG exists — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frze (talk • contribs) 2014-03-04T17:41:20 (UTC)
Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 14:16, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
COM:DW 77.184.169.50 20:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 12:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is there a copyright on these sculptures? Probably, but I'm not sure darkweasel94 15:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Certainly there is a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in the USA, no photographs allowed of sculpture by a recently deceased artist. Binksternet (talk) 21:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- However, you may use your photographs in a 'fair use' manner, that is, in the context of scholarship, criticism, journalism or parody. And Wikipedia is a form of journalism. Pattymooney (talk)
- There is no guarantee that this image as hosted by WMF will not be used for commercial purposes, such as would harm the estate of the artist. That's the whole point of reviewing images here; if we could host any kind of image for scholarship reasons then we could copy anything at any time. Binksternet (talk) 04:50, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Fair use is forbidden at Commons, and per COM:FOP#United_States. — Revicomplaint? 08:13, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Non-free model; no evidence that it is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 12:53, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement Fetx2002 (talk) 19:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily — Revicomplaint? 08:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well, there is a CC license, but the given sourc does not indicate this license is correct. There might be other PD reason might be not. JuTa 18:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: There is, in fact, no license from the named author. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Lovely portrait photo, but I don't see sufficient proof that the photographer himself has given permission to release this photo under a CC license. Spinster (talk) 19:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Validation vio com:OTRS os required Natuur12 (talk) 14:18, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
This file contains nude body. Thermicien (talk) 08:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep, it is used and many other nude too — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ada Unda (talk • contribs) 07:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- It's in use now, but wasn't when I first commented. diff Rybec (talk) 10:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Kept: In use and a selfie Natuur12 (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
New ask for deletion
[edit]
I think this page had been classified too quickly ; I'm asking again it to be deleted.
Reasons :
- The file contains explicit nude contains, as it was mentioned before
- It depicts identifiable person, with no way to tell wether it the downloader is the person pictured or not : by what we know, it could be a stolen photo published without permission.
- It has been objected that the file was in use on the wiki : the only page using it is User:OgreBot/Uploads by new users/2014 February 24 18:00, wich only lists new files ; it, indeed, indicates that the file is marked with a deletion request, and that the user already has a DR notice. No real page in any wiki uses it as a pertinent illustration.
I think the request has really been classified too quickly ; both Thermicien and Rybec argued against keeping it ; I think the argument that it is used can't stand, and being a selfie can't be a sufficient criter to keep it. The only person asking to keep it is the downloader itself, that, by the way, forgot to sign... -TheF (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - As I said, unappropriate nude picture of an identifiable person ; no use on educative purpose -TheF (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete : Picture useless, too identifiable person, nothing says she is agrees. Rome2 (talk) 16:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Consent could be shown by showing permission, which should be done because it is the only upload from that account. The photo was removed today from the "Selfie" article on the Swedish Wikipedia diff, on the grounds that there were too many images in the article. The line through my comment was meant to show that I had changed my mind because the reason I had given was no longer valid. Rybec (talk) 19:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Useless file with nude body. In my opinion Wikimedia Commons is not a place for erotic photos. -- Thermicien (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per "Low-quality pornographic images that do not contribute anything educationally useful to our existing collection of images are not needed on the Commons." However, Thermicien, your statement that "Wikimedia Commons is not a place for erotic photos" is troubling because my understanding is that Commons is NOT censored and that erotic photos in and of themselves are absolutely fine if they contribute in an educationally-useful context, no? JDanek007Talk 01:06, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, identifiable. — Revicomplaint? 08:19, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-free artwork visible (no COM:FOP in Russia) ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This isn't a real photograph. It's a composite of textures and shading effects. Half of the rice is cloned from close by, which looks pretty awful, and the rice appears to continue through the wall of the bowl. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
copyrighted Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Bonjour,
Le copyright du logo des GCB n'est pas votre propriété mais celle des Guides Catholiques de Belgique comme mentionné.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Florian.cdp (talk • contribs)
- You're right, it is their property and you should not have uploaded it to Commons. The fault is yours.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Dubious authorship claim: credited to someone else at w:File:ASI Art Gallery.jpg. Stefan4 (talk) 22:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Plakatkampagne des Saarländischen Rundfunks in Saarbrücken zur Bewerbung der 103-7 UnserDing Morningshow “Marek am Morgen“ 2014-01-28 09-57.jpg
[edit]
COM:DW. The copyrighted poster is the main topic of this image and used as such in the article at German Wikipedia. 77.184.152.112 13:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
There is a higher resolution version image here: File:Komodo Dragon (2007).jpg Leoboudv (talk) 05:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Great. Thanks. Then the one I uploaded is indeed good for deletion. MercedMike (talk) 06:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Normally you should just tag such images as {{Duplicate}}, adding the higher resolution file name in the tag, for speedy deletion. Ww2censor (talk) 10:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
OK, did it. Thanks for helping a newbie. MercedMike (talk) 15:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by PNG and SVG The Haz talk 06:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
No evidence on source page or elsewhere that Millennium Simulation material has been released under any kind of free license. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:25, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Watermarked 'AP' when displayed on the source website, therefore it is not a work of VOA. Wylve (talk) 19:42, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with the above; I somehow missed that one when uploading the file. --Kimsə (talk) 00:23, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Comment It's strange that the previous version of the file shows VOA photographer Daniel Schearf as the author of this image. --Kimsə (talk) 13:25, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
It is highly unlikely that this image is the uploader's own work. A higher resoluted version is e.g. available on amazon which was previously available there than on Commons. If the uploader should have been the original creator they should upload it in a higher resolution than the one's from the web High Contrast (talk) 21:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep As I have told you before, it is my photo of my knife. --Schwarzorange (talk) 10:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- And as I have stated above, this seems to be very doubtful since there are older and "bigger" versions of this image on the web. Can you upload your original version? --High Contrast (talk) 13:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- The Amazon image you link is smaller, not bigger. --Schwarzorange (talk) 15:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Compare the width of the two images: amazon 500 px; your copyvio 365 px. Understood? --High Contrast (talk) 16:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Do you want me to convert it to 501 px? Compare the height of the two images. Understood? --Schwarzorange (talk) 16:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Compare the width of the two images: amazon 500 px; your copyvio 365 px. Understood? --High Contrast (talk) 16:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- The Amazon image you link is smaller, not bigger. --Schwarzorange (talk) 15:31, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- And as I have stated above, this seems to be very doubtful since there are older and "bigger" versions of this image on the web. Can you upload your original version? --High Contrast (talk) 13:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
No, you will not convert anything. But you are still invited to upload your original full resoluted version with your EXIF data in order to show that amazon chose to use your image. And no, the white edge of the image is null because any idiot can add it or crop it away. Nevertheless, stop your attempt wasting other people's time. Just bring valid evidence that _you_ are the photographer of this image. And by the way, you might notice this image from this webshop - they also took "your photograph" by using a time machine or what? --High Contrast (talk) 16:57, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Stop wasting other people's time yourself. No, I will not make available a hires version of this photo for free, since it is paid studio work. --Schwarzorange (talk) 17:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Aha, a "paid studio work". It gets better and better. If this should be true, you must bring the permission for a free release of your studio photographer. Did this studio photographer bring this image to amazon or to the other web shop before you did decide to upload it to Commons? --High Contrast (talk) 17:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- I am the photographer. My friend, how many times do you want to hear it? --Schwarzorange (talk) 12:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- And this seems to be highly doubful my dear friend, since this file was available in higher resolutions on the web earlier than here on Commons. You are lying here or amazon and co did some massive copyright violation against you. --High Contrast (talk) 17:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- I am the photographer. My friend, how many times do you want to hear it? --Schwarzorange (talk) 12:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Aha, a "paid studio work". It gets better and better. If this should be true, you must bring the permission for a free release of your studio photographer. Did this studio photographer bring this image to amazon or to the other web shop before you did decide to upload it to Commons? --High Contrast (talk) 17:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: If it is your own work, follow COM:OTRS step. — Revicomplaint? 08:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion: User is a long time sockpuppeteer on de.wikipedia. Apparently he is using his sockpuppets on Commons to upload stolen content such as this. --Martin H. (talk) 16:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Conflicting information about license. The uploader states.
- Image depicting Psittacidae birds(left to right: Ara ararauna, Ara chloropterus, Ara macao). Taken by user:f3rn4nd0 for wikipedia and sibling projects only.
but uses {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0-migrated|Cc-by-2.5}} template.
Kersti (talk) 09:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
nawfel.cab@live.fr 197.29.146.52 15:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- ??? Misuse of the "Nomination for deletion" button ? - Drongou (talk) 16:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Most probably; there's nothing that justifies this deletion. And the image is used in the Visual Editor documentation (French version). The image is the French version of the similar image showing English, which is not deleted either. The iamge is appropriately described and licensed. Such request from unknown IP contributor, without any justification, may just be a random attack against Wikimedia projects, similar to spam; it may be interesting to see if that user has also targetted other images or attempted to deface some pages (but his past edit history on Commons is limited to just this page). But may be he was just trying a feature when reading the documentation. verdy_p (talk) 17:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Not a valid DR. — Revicomplaint? 08:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:Wappen Cottbus.png and File:Wappen Cottbus.svg, not recommendable file format. Perhelion (talk) 00:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the USA for sculptures made by a recently deceased artist. Binksternet (talk) 21:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP#United_States — Revicomplaint? 08:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE - self-promotional image INeverCry 22:40, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: — Revicomplaint? 08:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: no evidence that the text in verses is free. Eleassar (t/p) 18:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Italy: no evidence that this monument is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Info It's a monument to the first Italian killed in World War I, who died in 1915. Rybec (talk) 12:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: That may be, but 1915 is thirty years too recent for us to assume that the creator died before 1944. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Dubious authorship claim: credited to someone else at w:File:Yolanda villanueva-ong.jpg. Stefan4 (talk) 22:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
The photograph was evidently taken in a military museum in Vienna. There is no evidence that the photographer died before 1944 or that it is in the public domain for some other reason. Eleassar (t/p) 18:30, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Worse-quality duplicate of File:Vrisic pass, Slovenia (6918971161).jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 16:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 12:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
As noted on the English Wikipedia, the colours are badly done, the resolution is pretty awful, and also the data represented by this map seems to be completely incorrect, and is uncited. Many different sources cite different areas claimed by the countries in this map. The talk page on Wikipedia has more detail on why this image should be deleted. AirCombat (talk) 05:17, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
It could also be superceded by this image. AirCombat (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: The image is widely used and therefore policy prohibits its deletion except for copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Worse-quality duplicate of File:Vrisic pass, Slovenia (6772835398).jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 16:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 12:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Foto hat schlechte Qualität. Heute besseres gemacht. Bin der Fotograf und Hochlader. File:Witten Haus Bergerstraße 6.jpg Reclus (talk) 20:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Okey Natuur12 (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Fail FOP in Belgium Flickrworker (talk) 13:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- No copyrightable design although i'd rather delete it because it doesn't look like own work. --Denniss (talk) 20:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: All architiecture has a copyright -- the only EU exception we know of is very simple manufactured housing. But, as you say, it is all over the Web, so probably a copyvio also. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: 1916 architecture, no evidence that the architect died before 1945. Eleassar (t/p) 17:02, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free text. Eleassar (t/p) 18:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Official text from the 1974 Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Slovenia. --Eleassar (t/p) 18:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Fail FOP in Italy Flickrworker (talk) 14:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Btr as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio, VYGOcommons is not the author of the sail emblem of Soling-Class! So the Sign can not be GFDL or CC KTo288 (talk) 06:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept: According to the Soling class logo specifications, the logo is the Greek letter Omega, which, of course, cannot be copyrighted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Worse-quality duplicate of File:Vrisic pass, Slovenia (6772846390).jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 16:47, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY 12:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative work of content protected by copyright A.Savin 12:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Формулировка не совсем точна. Нет логического повода удалять данное фото, разве что личные амбиции или профессиональная несостоятельность, которая случайно оказалась состоятельной на этом проекте... Ivanaivanova (talk) 21:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Again, you may not upload images of copyrighted works. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Contemporary sculpture, no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 12:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Ну, современная... А удалять зачем? Ivanaivanova (talk) 21:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Contemporary sculpture, no FoP in Russia. A.Savin 12:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Flags of Santander, Colombia
[edit]We need to have a single file of the flag of this Colombian department. Currently in commons there are three versions of this flag, one of which is the most used through wikis and which has the longest history (Flag of Santander (Colombia).svg). The flag has changed several times of white stars on his left part (first 5, later 8 and currently has 6), I updated this last named file (for the reasons given above) and also I uploaded the earlier versions as historical flags (Historical flags of the department of Santander).
.svg){kind=link}
The official website of the department has no page about their symbols (previously it had, but was removed), however in these images ([4] and [5]) we can see how is the current flag. The pages have date in case if you wish to review it.
Therefore, to unify the use and history of this flag, I propose the deletion of the following images:
- File:Bandera de Santander (Colombia).svg
- File:Flag of Santander Department.svg (this flag has wrong colors and size of the bars)
.svg){kind=link}
Pardon my english. --Shadowxfox (talk) 17:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- I would suggest keeping File:Flag of Santander Department.svg and deleting the other two, this one is the best quality. Fry1989 eh? 19:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- That file has wrong the size of the bars, in particular the red bar and the black bar. I don't know what are you referring with "best quality", because all the three flags are SVG.--Shadowxfox (talk) 07:10, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- The colours are better and the stars are best aligned. You can change the red bar if need be. Fry1989 eh? 17:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- That file has wrong the size of the bars, in particular the red bar and the black bar. I don't know what are you referring with "best quality", because all the three flags are SVG.--Shadowxfox (talk) 07:10, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, but according to my opinion these reasons are not enough to keep it. Why? the colors don't follow the parameters of the FIAV/Wiki. The stars and the bars don't follow the alignment shown here and here.--Shadowxfox (talk) 18:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- The FIAV rules mean nothing, countries don't have to follow that and I bet you most don't. That file's colours are closest to your photos. And as I said before, you can fix the bars if they are wrong, or did you just ignore that part of my response? Fry1989 eh? 18:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, but according to my opinion these reasons are not enough to keep it. Why? the colors don't follow the parameters of the FIAV/Wiki. The stars and the bars don't follow the alignment shown here and here.--Shadowxfox (talk) 18:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Pardon? the FIAV conventions mean NOTHING? you, who claims to be a passionate in vexillology says that thing? I'm ignoring your request for 2 reasons: first, the most used flag was updated, and second, the most commonly used file of this pavilion is Flag_of_Santander_(Colombia).svg in all wikipedias which reduces to 0 the operations have to perform a robot to change file names in all wikipedias (pardon the redundancy and my English). Standardization in files of commons is not explicit but implicit rule, and follow the conventions of the workshops about vexillology is a form of it. --Shadowxfox (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- That's exactly right, it means nothing. Countries define their flag colours, not some convention. Fry1989 eh? 00:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Pardon? the FIAV conventions mean NOTHING? you, who claims to be a passionate in vexillology says that thing? I'm ignoring your request for 2 reasons: first, the most used flag was updated, and second, the most commonly used file of this pavilion is Flag_of_Santander_(Colombia).svg in all wikipedias which reduces to 0 the operations have to perform a robot to change file names in all wikipedias (pardon the redundancy and my English). Standardization in files of commons is not explicit but implicit rule, and follow the conventions of the workshops about vexillology is a form of it. --Shadowxfox (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Well, I think the reasons that you have given are not meaningful either (¿this file has better quality? ¿the colors are better?); is ironic considering that you say FIAV colors mean nothing, then the colors of File:Flag of Santander Department.svg not mean anything neither, the file has no relevance and can be deleted for that reason.
The colors of all flags of the Colombian departments in commons follows the parameters of the FIAV because there is no law showing that tonalities must use. My proposal is simple: standardize the flags of Colombian departments (colors and names), keep on commons the file most used (File:Flag of Santander (Colombia).svg) and modify it to convenience.
According to you, no matter if the bots have to change 30,000 articles in all wikis, because this file is most beautiful. Please, let's be serious: the administrators of commons have rejected other requested made by me for more logical reasons.--Shadowxfox (talk) 03:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
kept: In use and therefor in scope and for the wrong colors, com:NPOV. Natuur12 (talk) 14:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Derivative work of content protected by copyright A.Savin 12:53, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Мое фото, мой фотоаппарат, мое право... Ivanaivanova (talk) 21:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Yes, but you may not post images that contain other people's copyrighted works -- the horses -- to Commons. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Veliki Špiček
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 22:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cristal Arena
[edit]No FOP in Belgium
- File:Cristal Arena 2013-02-21 exterior.jpg
- File:Cristal Arena 2013-02-21 interior.jpg
- File:Cristal Arena 2013-02-21 main stand.jpg
- File:Cristal Arena 2013-02-21 opposite stand.jpg
- File:Cristal Arena Genk - Belgium.jpg
- File:Cristal Arena Genk vanop een terrill - België.jpg
- File:Cristalarena inside.jpg
- File:Cristalarena logo.jpg
Flickrworker (talk) 13:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sander.v.Ginkel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright/fails FOP in Italy
- File:2013 UCI Road World Championships, Ticket 22 September.jpg
- File:2013 UCI Road World Championships, Ticket 28 September.jpg
- File:2013 UCI Road World Championships, Ticket 24 September.jpg
Flickrworker (talk) 14:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sander.v.Ginkel (talk · contribs)
[edit]The statement at the sources webpage is not free enough. Your are free to use them as long as you credit the photographer but this does not include making derivatives, and spreading the file. Statement is not free enough for Commons.
- File:Sanne van Paassen-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Romy Kasper-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Nina Kessler-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Nicky Zijlaard-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Marieke van Wanroij-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Jessie Daams-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Janneke Ensing-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Emma Trott-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Demi de Jong-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Megan Guarnier Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Lizzie Armitstead-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Katarzyna Pawlowska-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Ellen van Dijk-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Christine Majerus-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
- File:Megan Guarnier-Boels Dolmans Cycling Team 2014.jpg
Natuur12 (talk) 12:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- I see your point. What should be the statement on their website, so I'll ask them to change it if they want to. Which of these licences are suitable for commons (CC BY; CC BY-ND; CC BY-NC-SA; CC BY-SA; CC BY-NC; CC BY-NC-ND) see here? And otherwise, since the images are free to use, is it maybe possible to move them to Wikipedia, so they can still be used in articles? Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 12:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- I figured out it is also not allowed to upload the files to Wikipedia. I sent the team an email to ask them whether or not they allow it to keep the images on Wikimedia/Wikipedia. Please give them some time to reply before removing the images. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 13:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- @Sander.v.Ginkel: CC BY (attribution) and CC BY-SA (attribution and share-alike) are OK; any jurisdiction (including the "generic" jurisdiction) and any version (including "or any later version") are acceptable: for example {{Cc-by-sa-2.0+}}. Really, anything without the "NC" or "ND" parts. {{CC-zero}} is also acceptable, but you probably don't want that because it doesn't require attribution: It's basically a public domain dedication. --Closeapple (talk) 16:40, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. Either CC-BY or CC-BY-SA is acceptable. Note that both WP:EN and Commons require that images be free for any use -- a "yes" as an answer to your question "whether or not they allow it to keep the images on Wikimedia/Wikipedia" is not sufficient for either. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
If you are the uploader, please email COM:OTRS to get these restored -FASTILY 08:45, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sander.v.Ginkel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Same reason as last time, release at the source website is not explicit enough plus this release is a bit questional at best anyways.
Natuur12 (talk) 21:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC) ___________
Deleted same reason as last time. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
possible copyvios - collection of works by living artist Pierre Heymans with no indication of permission, also a couple screencaps from a tv interview, a newspaper clipping, etc - also, there are no wiki articles or even signifigant coverage of this artist online, so I wonder if this artist's works are in COM:SCOPE?
- File:Pierre et Suzana.JPG
- File:Pierre Heymans et la presse.JPG
- File:Pierre Heymans et la presse1.JPG
- File:Valerie et les oiseaux.jpg
- File:Seriegraphie-Lazare au tombeau.jpg
- File:Aquarelle sur Prague.jpg
- File:Portrait du pere de Pierre Heymans.jpg
- File:Ostende-1997.jpg
- File:Louftemont.jpg
- File:La Rochelle - entrée du port.jpg
- File:L'artiste aide a voir-Bruxelles.jpg
- File:Le secret - by Pierre Heymans.jpg
- File:Sophie - by Pierre Heymans.jpg
- File:Tete d'enfant terre cuite - by Pierre Heymans.jpg
- File:La Robe vue de face - by Pierre Heymans.jpg
- File:La femme aux oiseaux - Pierre Heymans.jpg
- File:Quebec sur le Richelieu - by Pierre Heymans.jpg
- File:Ballet - legerté.jpg
- File:Leçon de guitarre - peinture a l'huile Pierre Heymans.jpg
- File:Ballet - portée.jpg
- File:Discours du bourgomestre de Schaerbeek - vernissage Pierre Heymans.jpg
- File:Portraitiste de la ville-journal - Pierre Heymans.jpg
- File:Gros temps - Ostende.jpg
- File:Ballet - duo.jpg
- File:BRUXELLES coverture du livre.jpg
- File:Aquarelle Eglise de la Madeleine.jpg
- File:La dame en rouge à Ostende.jpg
- File:Les amoreaux à Ostende.jpg
- File:Rue au Charbon-Bruxelles.jpg
- File:Hors Saison - Deux barques.jpg
- File:La grand Place - Bruxelles.jpg
- File:Jean Philippe dort.jpg
- File:Imagem 6 Pierre.jpg
- File:Imagem 4 Pintura Pierre.jpg
- File:Imagem 5 Pintura Pierre.jpg
- File:Imagem 3 Escultura Pierre.jpg
- File:Imagem 1 Bruxelas.jpg
- File:Imagem 2 Ballet.jpg
INeverCry 22:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 11:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
No FoP for artistic works in Japan. The sculptor 堀進二 (Hori, Shinji) died in 1978, [6][7] so the work is neither in the public domain. Might be locally accepted under as a non-free content, on English Wikipedia and/or Japanese Wikipedia for example. whym (talk) 13:31, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-03-03T21:54:54 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:34, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Watermarked 'AFP' when displayed on source website. Therefore, this is not a work of VOA. Wylve (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:34, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
