Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/02/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 15th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Copyright violation 94.189.194.63 02:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations from user. Martin H. (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Copyright violation 94.189.194.63 02:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations from user. Martin H. (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Copyright violation 94.189.194.63 02:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations from user. Martin H. (talk) 03:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Copyright violation 94.189.194.63 02:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations from user. Martin H. (talk) 03:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Copyright violation 94.189.194.63 02:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations from user. Martin H. (talk) 03:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Copyright violation 94.189.194.63 02:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations from user. Martin H. (talk) 03:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Copyright violation 94.189.194.63 02:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Recent artwork, not public domain. Martin H. (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: Delete here and move to enwiki as a non-free image. David Gentleman is still alive and FoP does not apply to 2D mural or posters in the UK even whne permanently displayed per COM:FOP#United Kingdom. Ww2censor (talk) 10:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Merged into a larger DR at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Art in London Underground -mattbuck (Talk) 11:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos quite similar : File:Siene River 54 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 55 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 56 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 57 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 58 2012-07-01.jpg. I keep File:Siene River 59 2012-07-01.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 11:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 02:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos quite similar : File:Siene River 54 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 55 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 56 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 57 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 58 2012-07-01.jpg. I keep File:Siene River 59 2012-07-01.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 02:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos quite similar : File:Siene River 54 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 55 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 56 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 57 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 58 2012-07-01.jpg. I keep File:Siene River 59 2012-07-01.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 11:21, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 02:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos quite similar : File:Siene River 54 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 55 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 56 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 57 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 58 2012-07-01.jpg. I keep File:Siene River 59 2012-07-01.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 11:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 02:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos quite similar : File:Siene River 54 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 55 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 56 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 57 2012-07-01.jpg, File:Siene River 58 2012-07-01.jpg. I keep File:Siene River 59 2012-07-01.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 11:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 02:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage text, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 14:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage text, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 14:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to low image quality and likely non-notable person. In addition, the word "Bitch" in the filename and description suggests that this may be meant as an attack image. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: clearly out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:46, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by nom. ALE! ¿…? 23:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:46, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by nom. ALE! ¿…? 23:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by nom. ALE! ¿…? 23:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by nom. ALE! ¿…? 23:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:49, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by nom ALE! ¿…? 23:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by nom ALE! ¿…? 23:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by nom ALE! ¿…? 23:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by nom ALE! ¿…? 23:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out pf scope/spam. Savhñ 11:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by nom ALE! ¿…? 23:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Savhñ 12:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by nom ALE! ¿…? 23:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, description is private live. out of scope Andy king50 (talk) 09:45, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:49, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:49, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 14:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:18, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

비방(insult) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neoalpha (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T10:05:43‎ (UTC)


Deleted: See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 09:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: See COM:SCOPE Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo el dueño de la imagen quiero borrarla por que realize una mejor vectorizada. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolandodeynigo (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T10:42:02‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, as the uploader [here] wishes to delete, the file is unused and replacement exists, I close this request speedily. Taivo (talk) 20:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone put a speedy delete on this talk ppage -- one I found really cryptic. Speedy deletion is only for obvious cases. The explanation "Failed open proxy spambot spam" is cryptic, not obvious. Maybe this is an obvious case, and the nominator was too tired to draft a genuinely obvious explanation... but... Geo Swan (talk) 03:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This was just some spam left on the talkpage by a spambot. Speedy was fine. Natuur12 (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Item does already exist in png, wrong upload. Kulter20 (talk) 00:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of scope. Likely not own work. Savhñ 12:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

www.vodafonearena.com.tr Hobbit28 (talk) 23:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of anather photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-15T17:04:43‎ (UTC)


Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 16:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of other phoro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T04:57:07‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of other phoro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T04:57:31‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of other phoro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T04:55:58‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested Natuur12 (talk) 16:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of other phoro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T04:56:43‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader requested Natuur12 (talk) 16:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover, unlikely to be free license, and/or uploaders "own work" as stated. Low size, blurry pixel edges suggest its a recopied JPG and possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free photo--Panam2014 (talk) 13:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook photo does not imply anyone can use it.--175.143.236.222 01:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-free content Tarawneh (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurry, and there are similar pictures that could replaced this particular pic. Briarfallen (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from game, possible COM:COPYVIO. Game is from Moby, non-exact image, but same gameshot here [1] for reference. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatent promotion, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of other phoro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T04:55:25‎ (UTC)


Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused: out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since both hands of the subject of the photo named "Dorobantu George" uploaded by "DorobantuGeorge" are shown in this photo, the permission of the photographer is needed, and the licensing is hence incorrect, making this image a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I know it is "only text" but I'm afraid Disney are very jealous of their copyrighted font. A more expert opinion would be welcome. Eusebius (talk) 09:18, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same here:

--Eusebius (talk) 09:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to Commons:Licensing#Fonts the writting done with a font is not copyrightable, only the font file itself. As this is a pixel image, it is not copyrightable according to that rule. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 19:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by a vector file: File:Disneynature logo.svg Carniolus (talk) 13:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: We don't usually delete images that have been superseded by vectors. ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep; (tagged). Jee 04:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No consensus for deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 16:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Underexposed. Looks like personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#United_States does not apply to statues. Also, the file is poorly named and has an incorrect description. This is the MLK Memorial. 67.87.46.39 21:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-11T11:49:02‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS Ticket#2012061910006934 by web site owner - claimed derivative of http://usarmyinsigniahomepage.co.nf/cw_ocs.html  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The original work is a derivative of a PD design, and does not meet the threshold of originality, so this is also PD. I've changed the license to reflect this. The Haz talk 06:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD PumpkinSky talk 00:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS Ticket#2012061910006934 by web site owner - claimed derivative of http://usarmyinsigniahomepage.co.nf/cw_ocs.html  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The original work is a derivative of a PD design, and does not meet the threshold of originality, so this is also PD. I've changed the license to reflect this. The Haz talk 06:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD PumpkinSky talk 00:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File description and user name same, implies "official" status. Logo is marked (R), no indication that this is "own work" of uploader. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS Ticket#2012061910006934 by web site owner - claimed derivative of http://usarmyinsigniahomepage.co.nf/cw_ocs.html  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've put in a request at the Graphics lab for these to be redone without backgrounds or text. The badges themselves are PD.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The original work is a derivative of a PD design, and does not meet the threshold of originality, so this is also PD. I've changed the license to reflect this. The Haz talk 06:23, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD PumpkinSky talk 00:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-11T11:48:43‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution. Looks like personal image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File can be found here [2] with information on how to buy the license. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of presumably living, non-notable subject outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T13:22:11‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works published in 1933 in Germany left copyright no earlier then 2003, and thus were restored by the URAA; it will leave copyright in 2028 in the US. Prosfilaes (talk) 04:39, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . JuTa 18:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is used repeatedly on the internet as a publicity photo for this young Japanese actor (ex: [3] here). There is nothing in the metadata to support the "own work" claim of the uploader. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a copyright infringement of http://www.poetryfoundation.org/bio/geoffrey-hill or http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/jacketcopy/2009/04/geoffrey-hill-the-poets-public-burden.html or their source. One page says "Hill photo credit: Chris Floyd" which does not match the current licensing, unless the user is Floyd, which if claimed should be verified via OTRS, I would think. DESiegel (talk) 20:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: likely copyright infringement Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T13:21:51‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't tell if the uploader is really the author - see http://www.moskva.fm/artist/%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BD/about and https://plus.google.com/photos/115369129628374655444/albums/5722445025277165217?banner=pwa. Bbb23 (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is an incorrect version of Concón's official coat of arms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanesa.fez (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T15:00:01‎ (UTC)

 Keep Sources? Fry1989 eh? 03:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I´m member of Ilustre Municipalidad de Concón´s communication department.


Kept: In use Natuur12 (talk) 15:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size and fuzzy pixel edges suggest recopying, image found [4] here, sourced to "Página Siete" and marked "Copyright © 2011 La Frontera Dos" suggests that this is not uploader's "own work" as stated and instead possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was trimmed from an album or CD cover see [5] here for many uses around the Internet, possible COM:COPYVIO. Incidentally copy is written like a promotional piece. Commons is not for promotion or self promotion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Copyright violation 94.189.194.63 02:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source and author "private archive Konfrštových, 2014 Author Bara Bálková and Miroslav Locksmith" are not same as uploader. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Also same size large image available here [6], home page of that website is marked copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-11T11:49:21‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T04:17:07‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text in document outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no value Indeedous (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not Facebook or other social media. This unused image of non-notable, presumably living male is outside of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from website [7] here marked copyright. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flower is blurred. Superseded by the image, in which the flower is clearer File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2758.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:21, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by similar, better straightened image File:KyivBotGardenGryshko IMGP2691.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:57, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, low quality and lack of verifiable source makes this picture of a football player a possible COM:COPYVIO. I found the rest of his team in various places on the internet see [8] here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is found [9] here, credited to photographer thus "Фото: из личного архива Олега Ковригина.", page marked "© ЗАО ИД «Комсомольская правда», 2014." Unlikely to be "own work" of uploader. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as it is stated on the web page you have provided, "this picture is provided by the archive of the owner" : Oleg Kovrigin. This picture was taken from him. So the owner of this picture knows that this picture will be/is already listed on the Wikipedia. I am not sure how this situation are meant to be solved, please let me know. Thanks. Ppjev (talk) 21:59, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The owner of the picture will have to upload the picture him/herself or else go thru the Commons:OTRS process to provide approval. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Validaiton via com:OTRS is required Natuur12 (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A ship is not a simple geometric shape. This is definitely above UK threshold of originality. LX (talk, contribs) 22:11, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect (and unneeded) caption, partly with background color; alternative available: File:3,3',5,5'-tetramethyl--1,1'-biphenyl--4,4'-diamine oxidation.svg. Leyo 22:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per noted problems: caption-bg is a layout defect and presence of caption at all interferes with reusability, given we have alt that resolves them. What's actually incorrect about the caption? DMacks (talk) 08:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The drawing shows the reaction of 3,3',5,5'-tetramethyl-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diamine (C16H20N2) to 3,3',5,5'-tetramethyl-[1,1'-bi(cyclohexylidene)]-2,2',5,5'-tetraene-4,4'-diimine (C16H18N2). The given name “3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine” translates into the correct structure; however, “3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine diimine” actually is (3,3',5,5'-tetramethyl-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diyl)bis(diazene) (C16H18N4). – Emeldir (talk) 11:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
SciFinder lists "benzidine diimine" as one of the names for the non-methylated product (CAS# 6050-16-4). The "diimine" part of the name is just ambiguous in various contexts: can be parsed as diazene parent structure (with substituents) vs having two imine groups on some other parent structure. DMacks (talk) 17:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Once again. This file is in use and therefor it is automaticly in scope. Please recplace the image and than nominate it again. Natuur12 (talk) 15:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from book or other half-toned source, but user gave "own work" as source which is highly doubtful, subject died in 1962. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is now available under the title File:Nueve 2012.png. TeleMania (discusión) 14:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size and low quality image of non-notable presumably living male is outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think the original enwiki uploader is not the author of the photo, given the resolution is extremely low and this user has uploaded unfree files in enwiki marking them as own work many times before. I also listed for deletion in enwiki the original image. --Blacklake (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No source, no permission. Copyright violation 94.189.194.63 02:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations from user. --Martin H. (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorized image of non-notable, presumably living male, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of recent newspaper is out of COM:SCOPE. Incidentally, the title of the image is identical to the name of the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen capture, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work is by Greg Stimac [10], a living artist, possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

disputed authorship: printing artifacts is visible Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:06, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of art by non-notable and self promoting artist places image out of COM:SCOPE and presence here [11] of this image and many others, page marked copyright also raises issues of COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image found here [12] marked (C) 2013 MWFC. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is unused, based on the description the uploader knew it needed to be used. Out of COM:SCOPE, non-notable individual, recognizable and presumably living. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 13:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:12, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, blurry pixel edges and the metadata saying "Author :Al Bruni: Copyright holder :Al Bruni: Photographies - All rights reserved" and appearance here [13] marked © 2011. PillBox.it. All Rights Reserved. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size image, found [14] here marked copyright suggest this is a possible COM:COPYVIO. Incidentally, name of uploader may imply pranking or hoaxing. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the photo and design on the bag. darkweasel94 14:43, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Hallo colleagues! Please not delete i have upload a new picture.Thanks and greetings user:Tiefkuehlfan 17:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Die neue Version ist auch ein abgeleitetes Werk. Das ist nicht besser. Das Bild auf dem Sack ist von Iglo oder jemandem, der vermutlich dort arbeitet, urheberrechtlich eingeschränkt und ein derart zentrales Element des Bildes, dass COM:DM definitiv nicht greift. Eine leere Tiefkühlschublade oder eine, auf der du das Bild auf den Säcken unkenntlich gemacht (geschwärzt) hast, können wir gerne behalten. darkweasel94 17:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tut mir Leid wegen des vorigen Kommentars, das war ein Fehler, ich habe noch die alte Version gesehen, weil ich den Cache nicht geleert habe. Dennoch gilt das, was ich geschrieben habe, auch für die andere Version. darkweasel94 17:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ein neues Bild ohne Markentiefkühlkost hochgeladen. Hoffentlich ist es jetzt o.k. Die alten Versionen bitte löschen.     mfg. Tiefkuehlfan
Ja, sollte so passen. Translation for the closing admin:  Keep current version as COM:DM,  Delete old versions. darkweasel94 18:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: done Natuur12 (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T12:39:08‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T12:42:28‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of other photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T08:03:37‎ (UTC)


Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T09:03:17‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T09:01:51‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T12:39:44‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T12:40:16‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T09:03:44‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T09:00:38‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of other picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T12:38:20‎ (UTC)


Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is marked "Jade Eleonoire PHOTOGRAPHY" in upper left corner, suggests this is not user's own work as given in the source. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-15T16:25:42‎ (UTC)


Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T12:41:51‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T08:59:13‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture from the folder of the CD. Nothing says that the uploader is the photograph who took this picture. I asked the photograph (Yann Orhan) two weeks ago by mail if he knowns if his picture was uploaded here but I had no answer. The only answer I had by the uploader is "We are the producer of Zaz, we have all the rights". Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 23:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T12:43:30‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T21:44:58‎ (UTC)


Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 15:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.vodafonearena.com.tr/Gallery.aspx Hobbit28 (talk) 23:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description and use of this image solely on a user page, plus its low size and general blurryness, make this image outside COM:SCOPE for useful educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image of non-notable presumably living subject with derrogatory title and Description is outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-11T11:48:05‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of other photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-15T16:27:40‎ (UTC)


Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T08:56:45‎ (UTC)


Deleted: And com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-13T12:44:12‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T21:46:17‎ (UTC)


Deleted: com:DW Natuur12 (talk) 15:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-11T11:49:42‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-11T11:48:25‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-11T11:46:27‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A resume of a non-notable individual is outside of COM:SCOPE. Commons isn't a social media site. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album/CD cover all over the internet [15], authors are here given, but with no apparent connection to uploader. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:39, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fetx2002 (talk • contribs) 2014-02-11T11:47:43‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by I000350 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Those maps/sattlite views doesn't look like own work of the uploader as stated.

JuTa 12:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:11, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Briandclose (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files are missing source information and metadata. The primary subject died in the late 1980s, it is not easy to assume photographer has been dead long enough to yield copyright. Possible COM:COPYVIOs.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivatives of artworks by Otto Gerster. He died in 1982, the works are far from Public Domain, no info on permission by the heirs. File:Duisburg-hbf-gemaelde.jpg is to be deleted as well: the photo was taken within the Duisburg train station and the Germany's Panorama Freedom does not apply for interiors of buildings.

A.Savin 11:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture from the folder of the CD. Nothing says that the uploader is the photograph who took this picture. I asked the photograph (Yann Orhan) two weeks ago by mail if he knowns if his picture was uploaded here but I had no answer. The only answer I had by the uploader is "We are the producer of Zaz, we have all the rights". Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 23:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seamurph (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The EXIF datas suggest that uploader is not the copyright holder of the images.

Jespinos (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seamurph (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 21:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:40, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danman1022 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto ( Oficial ) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 01:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence this was published 70 years ago or more. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:16, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Franco L (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only this image from his dog is his own work. The rest, unlikely. 10+ files already identified today as copyvio. File:Juventud2001.jpg may come from http://cajuventuduu.blog.terra.com.ar/2008/03/ = http://cajuventuduu.blog.terra.com.ar/files/2009/06/juventus.jpg (both: connect problems). IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (missing exif etc.) so this one can't be believed either.

Gunnex (talk) 20:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:Gente de Montecaseros.jpg, eventually grabbed somewhere from Facebook = https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/165777_130447303688246_4374865_n.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Franco L (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering +5 today detected copyvios, User talk:Franco L (tons of copyvios) + block log.

Gunnex (talk) 10:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Franco L (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free logos (also are above COM:TOO).

--XXN, 17:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Previous DRs

No freedom of panorama in the United States. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial.

Stefan4 (talk) 11:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues at this memorial are copyrighted by Gaylord. COM:FOP#United_states has no provision for statues.

67.87.46.39 21:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is well established -- a ruling by the US Supreme Court -- that the sculptures of the soldiers are under copyright and cannot be reproduced without compensation to the sculptor. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, + the one with keep request as well. The reflections make it unusable. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues at this memorial are unfortunately copyrighted. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial.

BMacZero (🗩) 21:39, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:08, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues at this memorial are unfortunately copyrighted. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial. (Sorry closing admin, I don't know how I missed this many last time I looked through here)

BMacZero (🗩) 22:22, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My fan again!!
BMacZero, thank you for noticing... however I have one question, this sculptures were not commissioned by the USA Government? They do not have a law covering this kind of case? I saw the case of the Post Office, since them nothing changed? Anyone check it again?
Hedwig in Washington you had kept the file File:Korean Memorial4.JPG, no? "per nomination, + the one with keep request as well" Why did you delete it after? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 13:36, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodrigo.Argenton: I have briefly Googled and was unable to find an overturning decision. Works made for the United States Government by a contractor are generally not placed in the public domain, especially in this case as Gaylord's contract explicitly specified that he maintained the rights. – BMacZero (🗩) 15:37, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
BMacZero, humm, okay, thank you for the information. And thank you again for noticing. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 15:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues at this memorial are unfortunately copyrighted. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial.

BMacZero (🗩) 16:16, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 03:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm back again with more of these copyrighted statues. See the above DRs. Sorry, this batch is mostly from my bot.

BMacZero (🗩) 04:09, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculptures here are under copyright.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think I skipped nominating these on my last pass because there may be a weak case for DM, but I don't oppose deletion. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This one also extremely similar: File:Korean War Memorial at National Mall & Memorial Parks (4f0f6a20-27a2-45c0-b724-658c67d6e07c).jpg. – BMacZero (🗩) 16:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 04:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statues at this memorial are unfortunately copyrighted. See Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Korean War Veterans Memorial.

BMacZero (🗩) 15:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 04:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work copyright violations: there is no freedom of panorama in the United States, and these images lack permission from the heirs of the sculptors. File:Washington F2492 (7144738487).jpg is not de minimis as it is not trivial here: US de minimis is more restricted as it uses triviality concept. See also a court case Gaylord v. United States.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, all sections above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. --Minoraxtalk 01:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free sculptures, see previous discussions.

BMacZero (🗩) 00:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete all nominated images. See also: USA Today article (Gaylord v. United States conclusion, with the sculptor the victor). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete per nom, all sections above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:27, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete per nom. Sennecaster (talk) 19:52, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: However, I must remind everyone that photos taken in a public place are not eligible for speedy deletion per COM:CSD#F3. -- King of ♥ 07:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images show at least one of the soldier statues in a non-trivial manner. There is no freedom of panorama for copyrighted public art in the United States. This artwork is not freely-enjoyable: see Gaylord v. United States (USA Today article). Retention of these images will put American and even international reusers at risk of lawsuits from Gaylord's heirs!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom, all sections above.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete and trim the one with Former President Bush. Sennecaster (talk) 19:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted 2 and trimmed 1 per nom. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristiano sunshine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Besides, it's not like self-portraits.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Shadyqubaty

[edit]

Non-free images published under spurious licenses. None of the pages that were supposed to contain the licensing information actually did so, with many bearing copyright tags or even "all rights reserved" notes. Huon (talk) 23:37, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uncle Gary's Peppers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

product advertising

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:09, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Walter.albornoz17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Besides, it's not like self-portraits.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 김경훈 건축가 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SCOPE?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victorg.india (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatent promotional images marked with name and website of company, outside of COM:SCOPE. I did not nominate for deletion the unused images of hypodermic supplies which were not obviously marked with the company information.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:49, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete commons is not for advertising. Kathisma (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 08:46, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sudhirdalai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zantoroni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The photos come from a Flickr account that includes content from stock photo agencies like Getty Images or from news agencies like Associated Press. Hence that account is not reliable. The logos apparently are above the threshold of originality.

Jespinos (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Medal and text are both copyrighted, making this a derivative work of a non-free object (i.e. a copyvio).  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source: Facebook, no permission 91.66.153.13 14:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 21:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploader added CC/GFL licenses later. This is obviously wrong for a 1906-1913 foto with unknown author. It might be {{PD-old}} or similar or might be not. We would need more info about the source and/or author. JuTa 12:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader is not the author 91.66.153.13 15:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 21:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It includes advertising of a commercial site Pompilos (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 21:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploader added CC/GFL licenses later. This is obviously wrong for a 1899 foto with unknown author. It might be {{PD-old}} or similar or might be not. We would need more info about the source and/or author. JuTa 12:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Medal is copyrighted, making this a derivative work of a non-free object (i.e. a copyvio).  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not meet COM:SCOPE: Unidentified painting with no description besides "tavla" ("picture" in Swedish). Also unclear permission, since it's unclear whether the painting is the uploader's work to license, or just the photograph. Explanation from the uploader would be welcome. Closeapple (talk) 10:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: Appears to be an album cover of "Nuevo Pacto" by "José Aponte. Eventually grabbed somewhere from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 08:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm sorry but thats not covered by COM:FOP#Japan.(source is JAPAN PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE -Kanko3131 (talk) 11:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is protected by copyright. TeleManía talk 15:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And the rest of this user's uploads too. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 21:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope collage The Yeti 07:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploader added CC/GFL licenses later. This is obviously wrong for a 1910 foto with unknown author. It might b {{PD-old}} or similar or might be not. We would need more info about the source and/or author. JuTa 12:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considering User talk:Elroy5 and logs, all previous uploads by this user related to the same person failed due to missing permission and were deleted. This file is (again) most likely not "own work" and needs (as indicated) permission from "Aldo Sessa". Gunnex (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously the image is scanned from a print image of uncertain copyright. No sign the uploader is copytright owner of the scanned image Andy king50 (talk) 08:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:The Little Princess (1939) full.ogv, which is the full film (this one somehow got clipped during the upload).  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 17:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 21:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License from uploader doesn't match Flicker license [16] nor is source given. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 21:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtfully "own work", it seems to be an scan of a magazine rather than a photo taken by the uploader. - Fma12 (talk) 04:12, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:50, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) Non-free image. Copyright claimed by Kanban Tool [17]; image clearly marked “Kanban Tool”. Uploader blocked on Wikipedia for spam; image appears to have been created at behest of Kanban Tool. 2) Second post-it note in first column marked “To Do” states “Subscribe to KanbanTool”, which is clearly spam. -- from uploaders Wikipedia user page -- User:Jeff.lasovski 16:55, 17 August 2012 5 albert square (talk | contribs) blocked Jeff.lasovski (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Spam / advertising-only account) Brimba (talk) 02:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Large file with EXIF, so doesn't appear to be a copyvio. Used in several legit articles, so not spam. INeverCry 20:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr uploader does not appear to be original copyright holder. Image (in context) is surrounded by other headshots of speakers taken in different locations, likely for promotional use for the Flickr account's parent event. If the image was cleared for their use, we have no evidence from the image's author that the image was intended for cc-by-sa release. czar  12:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt "Own work". The Al Jazeera logo in the lower right corner is clearly visible, so this is likely a screenshot. I doubt "own work" for all of the other uploads of this user as well. Nasenfelstunnel (talk) 07:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong sized banner →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 06:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong sized banner →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 06:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:53, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal photo. The Yeti 07:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

is used in an german article about this guy. So not really "out of scope"
However, copyright status is not clear, because it is written the image was copied from youtube.. - Andy king50 (talk) 09:21, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 20:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T09:02:21‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 21:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope; see w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yogesh Sharma89. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 21:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Ventura (talk • contribs) 2014-02-12T09:02:47‎ (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 21:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should be used with TeX, not in the image. —레비Revi 16:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect that there is juat an invention of a user, there is no any source. What is more - poor quality. Kpc21 (talk) 23:39, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Jcb Natuur12 (talk) 18:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, user-created, and it is not the official logo. The official logo is already uploaded: File:TVP_ABC-logo.jpg; moreover, it is featured on the official website of TVP ABC: http://abc.tvp.pl/ Kwpolska (talk) 09:49, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed. The official logo was released and is already available. There is no reason to keep a false logo. The Haz talk 02:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by a vector file: File:DisneyToon Studios logo.svg. Carniolus (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you but,We don't usually delete images that have been superseded by vectors.--EEIM (talk) 03:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license. The uploader added a CC license later. But this is realy not looking like own work by the uploader as claimed. JuTa 13:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license. The uploader added a CC license later. But this is realy not looking like own work by the uploader as claimed. Nissangeniss (talk) 02:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a person's signature, so there is no way it is appropriate to include on Commons. I'm also very dubious about the claim about it being ineligible for copyright. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:59, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. The uploader added CC/GFL licenses later. This is obviously wrong for a 1899 foto with unknown author. It might be {{PD-old}} or similar or might be not. We would need more info about the source and/or author. JuTa 12:43, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who exactly made the photos, but I do know their original sources are the Mojave River Valley Museum, and the photo of Marion and Mary Beal in Daggett about 1910 was provided for by one of my friends who owned the original. They do allow the photos at the museum to be redistributed for the sake or retelling history, and I only intend to use the photos to promote and represent the history of the things the photos represent, so that more people could know more about it and get more interested in history.

I have also original sources and documents from books that I have in my collection, and from various sources I have gathered from the internet and from people who have archived the history I have researched over the years, I put it here on Wikipedia so that all may hear the right information and that all will know the true story.


Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely poor resolution. It is unlikely that this is an original work. --Allan Aguilar·/t/ 02:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vermutlich ist G.K. nicht der Fotograf, also Urheber. Damit ist die Angabe unter Author falsch oder zu belegen. Jbergner (talk) 09:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mMn verstoß gegen das Persönlichkeitsrecht bzw. Recht am eigenen Bild eines Kindes. Das identifizierbare Kind ist nicht bloß eine Zutat der Bildkomposition. Jbergner (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author not a USGS employee [19], not published by the USGS: Geological Society of America — hike395 (talk) 22:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die Frau links am Stand ist nicht nur eine Zutat, sondern identifizierbarer Bildmittelpunkt. Gibt es eine Freigabe von ihr? Jbergner (talk) 09:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that this file is available, or has been available, under either of the indicated licenses. Neither the source at time of upload, or source now, have any free use statement attached. Note: this file is currently the main image for a DYK on enwiki. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication who created the design of the penny. If the local government, then this may be a derivative work of a non-free object (i.e. a copyright violation).  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • That would make it a derivative of a Free object: any design, photo or document that the government makes is Public Domain (the original penny). The new design itself is only facts and a picture of a building too old to be considered under copyright for the purpose of panoramic view, over 150 years old. The design wasn't by the local government, btw, it was by a local non profit. Technically, defacing US coinage is illegal so I doubt the city govt. would do that. Dennis Brown - © 11:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If a non-profit designed the engraving, it would certainly be copyrighted. The age of the building doesn't matter, as the design of the engraving would have attracted a new copyright (similar to why we cannot use random photographs of PD buildings). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Then just delete it, and just about everything else I've uploaded before 2010. I've had this discussion before here and just tired of debating it every time over such simple little things like photos of pig statues and the like. I understand protecting the interests of copyright holders and their right to profit from their works, but not sure how deleting images of a pressed coin helps us build an encyclopedia or depository of useful images, nor do I see how it deprives them of the exclusivity of their work. Dennis Brown - © 02:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dennis, the issue is not that we are protecting the interests of the copyright holders per se (although the end result is that), but that we are providing free content. Free to be used, free to be distributed, and free to be modified. That freedom does not exist where a work remains copyrighted, as (legally) one is not free to do these things, and could be subject to a copyright enforcement lawsuit. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Crisco, you already know I am an admin on enwp plus deal with copyright issues in my profession, it kind of sounds like you are talking down to me here. I've been involved with the whole "Free as in Speech" movement for two decades, I'm familiar with the concepts. I can quote sections of USC 17 verbatim. Worrying about pressed coins coming out of a country store in a small town just seems to be pedantic and misses the point of the law. I've already said, just delete it, and be sure to go through my contribs and delete the rest of the alleged infringements, save me the hassle of explaining each time. Dennis Brown - © 15:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dennis, I'm not trying to talk down to you. I'm just trying to make it perfectly clear that I don't consider it purely "protecting the interests of copyright holders and their right to profit from their works". Commons policy is fairly clear, through the precautionary principle, that anything which may be assumed to be copyrighted, even "pressed coins coming out of a country store in a small town", is not fit for Commons, as it is not free. As for "you already know I am an admin on enwp plus deal with copyright issues in my profession", that's one of the reasons I'm surprised you're taking this so badly. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not taking it badly, I just have no patience with Commons. I simply think the mindset of Commons is not consistent with the actual law in the US. I already said to delete it and anything else you want, you could have left it at that. Any lawyer would love to argue that the coin isn't subject to copyright protection, as the design is mainly words and a line drawing that is hardly original, it looks like 1000 courthouses. That is the point, and what makes concerning ourselves with it, well, pedantic. This isn't a high res photo of a painting. Just do whatever you think is best, I probably won't be around to care. Dennis Brown - © 01:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 09:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral I'm the creator (or should I say modifier) and uploader of this image. It was created for a button icon, to be used in User script in Wikisource. But in the end I decided to drop of that button and recombine it with other feature. So I or users of script written by me don't need it at this point. If you feel like 464 bytes (less then DB space already used up by this communication), 22px button icon here makes more harm then good, I don't oppose deletion of this particular image. But I strongly feel that I have to respond to your arguments, as they may be applied to other useful and critically important images in the future.
  1. It is not blurry, if you feel like it is, you're probable looking at tiny icon magnified 6 times it's size in file history thumbnail (22px pixels stretched to default 120px). Any raster (non-vector) image will look blurry if stretched 6 times.
  2. Isn't Commons used to hold images which are used in software running across MediaWiki projects? Being "deletionist" myself, I see no issues with thousand of icons placed here, and used in WikiMedia projects. I do use them, I do modify them when I need to, and I feel like sharing such modifications for other people to use, when they need. And I'm talking about usage in Wikimedia projects, for the goals of Education, Free content movement. You can see a dozen of similar, images in my recent uploads, please let me know, if you think that they're out of scope and should be deleted. I can encode them in CSS/JS of my scripts and use it like that, but other developers and designers will have a harder time reusing them, if they will be able to discover them, ever of course.
With arguments like your's applied, I'm afraind one may propose to delete which is the color version of icon in question . I ask them not to, as if you'll look around, you may notice, every MediaWiki user sees and uses this "blurry and out of scope" image as Reference button in their edit window, for last 5 years ;) Best. --Xelgen (talk) 20:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Since it's not in use, and blurry compared to the other images in your gallery, I nominated it. I didn't nominate the one which is in use, as you point out! I didn't nominate any of your other images, merely the one which wasn't used and didn't seem up to the usual high quality of your other images! Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 09:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mMn verstoß gegen das Persönlichkeitsrecht bzw. Recht am eigenen Bild eines Kindes. Das identifizierbare Kind ist nicht bloß eine Zutat der Bildkomposition. Jbergner (talk) 09:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Persönlichkeitsrechte sind hier kein Löschgrund. {{Personality rights}} hinzugefügt. --ALE! ¿…? 23:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 17:53, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo el dueño de la imagen quiero borrarla por que se realizo una mejor vectorizada. --Retaux (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

¿Porqué todavía no se a borrado está imagen? --Retaux (talk) 21:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ten más paciencia, amigo. Hay muchas tareas pedientes con que los bibliotecarios necesitamos acabar. Tenemos una grave escacez de personal.
En cualquier caso: ¿cuál es la imagen que reemplace ésta? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Retaux: , para poder borrarla debemos conocer qué imagen vectorizada es la que reemplaza a esta. Un saludo. Alan (talk) 01:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Taivo. INeverCry 17:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this photo was first published here on panoramio. I got the following message on my talk page

Hello, who can inform about copyright infringement uploading photographs on Wikipedia? It is the user who uploaded photos VadimS we belong Please delete these photos and block the user.
Regards, Constantin
Photographer, Art Style Studio

The username on Panoramio is the same as here on Commons, in other cases that has been enough to allow panoramo photo's. I think Art Style Studio should give more evidence that they have a copyright claim. Vera (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See also User_talk:AVRS#Удалений фотографий (in Russian, probably machine translation; the user Vadim Sterbate (talk · contribs) says he wants the photos deleted or protected [user VadimS (talk · contribs) had tried uploading lower-quality versions with watermarks] because of regular copyright violations), ro:Discuție_Utilizator:Andrei_Stroe#Vreau_s.C4.83_.C8.99terg_fotografii_.C3.AEnc.C4.83rcate_anterior and ro:Discuție_Utilizator:Andrei_Stroe#fotografii_de_.C8.99tergere (in Romanian). From machine translations of the Romanian messages, I concluded that the user might not have known that he had allowed use without personal permission. --AVRS (talk) 15:33, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! As evidence of my own photos, taken by Vadim S can send email NEF files or entire series of photographs taken on this day. Constantin


Who made the photos?
How is Vadim Sterbate related to the photos and to you?
Who has violated whose copyright and why?
--AVRS (talk) 16:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Intermediate image was watermarked copyright, later user removed the watermark. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ellin, how is a watermark added almost a year after upload an argument for deletion? --AVRS (talk) 17:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Because the question is indeed what was the reason for that watermarking: a copyright violation by the original upload, or the copyright holder trying to revoke his CC license (which is not allowed by the license). --AVRS (talk) 17:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS Ticket#2012061910006934 by web site owner - claimed derivative of http://usarmyinsigniahomepage.co.nf/cwcsmc.html  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The original work is a derivative of a PD design, and does not meet the threshold of originality, so this is also PD. I've changed the license to reflect this. The Haz talk 06:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Globally replaced by svg version FASTILY 10:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS Ticket#2012061910006934 by web site owner - claimed derivative of http://usarmyinsigniahomepage.co.nf/cw_ocs.html  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The original work is a derivative of a PD design, and does not meet the threshold of originality, so this is also PD. I've changed the license to reflect this. The Haz talk 06:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Globally replaced by svg version FASTILY 10:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See OTRS Ticket#2012061910006934 by web site owner - claimed derivative of http://usarmyinsigniahomepage.co.nf/cw_ocs.html  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The original work is a derivative of a PD design, and does not meet the threshold of originality, so this is also PD. I've changed the license to reflect this. The Haz talk 06:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Globally replaced by svg version FASTILY 10:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]