Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/11/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![38 File:يتجاهلونني ويريدون ان اسأل عنهم-عفواً" انا لا اركض خلف الطيور المهاجرة 2013-10-12 16-48.jpg](#File:يتجاهلونني_ويريدون_ان_اسأل_عنهم-عفواً"_انا_لا_اركض_خلف_الطيور_المهاجرة_2013-10-12_16-48.jpg){kind=link}
![59 File:Офис сграда "Витоша", София.JPG](#File:Офис_сграда_"Витоша",_София.JPG){kind=link}
![75 File:Agustin Nicolini "el hot" .jpg](#File:Agustin_Nicolini_"el_hot"_.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_006.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_1922_par_Oricelly_(ph._à_Paris)_médaillon.jpg){kind=link}
_1910_Pierre_(Oricelly)_c1_PLM.jpg){kind=link}
_1918_peint_sa_fille_Georgette_(Villers)_PDLM_S1_W.jpg){kind=link}
_1935_sa_fille_Georgette,_buste,_séance_de_pose(Neuilly)_PDLM_S1_W.jpeg){kind=link}
![178 File:" 02 - ITALY - 0,02 € Italia - Mole Antonelliana - Turin - Repubblica Italiana.jpg](#File:"_02_-_ITALY_-_0,02_€_Italia_-_Mole_Antonelliana_-_Turin_-_Repubblica_Italiana.jpg){kind=link}
Unintended upload OBS onthemove (talk) 04:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded unused file. Sreejith K (talk) 06:55, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Unintended upload OBS onthemove (talk) 04:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded unused file. Sreejith K (talk) 06:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
06038080169 41.140.162.100 12:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No valid rationale provided by nominator and not a file anyway. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
According to the FB page where this came from (which appears to be the official 'Trinity College, Cambridge" page), the photo was taken by a professional photographer, James Appleton. It does not seem likely that he would have uploaded it this way. 63.251.123.2 18:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, by McZusatz. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
OTRS autorisation needed - Copyvio http://djaminefunk.skyrock.com/ Mattho69 (talk) 02:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, OTRS is not needed, clearly out of scope. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
This image is a movie poster. I tagged the {{Copyvio}}, but IP user has removed. So I ask here. --OskNe (talk) 07:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, film posters should not be licenced as own work. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. The website license says that photos can be republished, but does not say that they could be modified. Ymblanter (talk) 09:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, per Ymblanter. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:38, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Changed the source to Flickr so changed license to Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic. Now the license file is correct and there is no need to delete this photo. VVGor (talk) 07:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- No, the Flickr licence for this photo is BY-CC-ND, which is not compatible with BB-CC-SA.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept, RelicensedYmblanter (talk) 12:49, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Substituted by a better version (File:Milano mappa rete filoviaria 1941-11-17.svg) Friedrichstrasse (talk) 09:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
My mistake. This is Flavan-3-ol, and there is a file for the other compound Albmont (talk) 11:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, unused file, uploader's request 5 days after uploading. Taivo (talk) 15:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
This appears to be a still from a copyrighted Harry Potter movie Judithcomm (talk) 11:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, I do not believe, that Harry Potter films are in public domain. Taivo (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Only used for a now-deleted en:wp page; functionally a vanity image and unlikely to be used for any other purpose, so out of scope. Nyttend (talk) 14:02, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Trijnsteltalk 17:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
promotional text, small size, no EXIF-data, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 18:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; Facebook image here. See summary - self promotion. Эlcobbola talk 21:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, out of scope, bad quality, unused. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo. This is not Facebook. Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo. This is not Facebook. Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, out of scope. Taivo (talk) 16:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Archivo erróneo JuanBautistaMoreno (talk) 09:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
bad quality Mehlauge (talk) 11:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept, what do you want from 1867 photo? All so old photos have bad quality, if compared with today's standards! The photo is valuable and used in de.wiki. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:03, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork. Jorge Barrios (talk) 14:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, this is photographic art and needs OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:15, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims. Rather than being "sdzfgfnjgh" (as the uploader describes it) created by the uploader, it appears to be a version of the logo of a South Korean TV show, presumably created by the Group 8 production company. The logo is too complex to be covered by {{PD-textlogo}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. As a Korean logo, this really does consist solely of Korean script (see en:Hangul), but the characters have been stylised to the point that they're not simple text. The situation's roughly analogous to the big Q in File:Inhabited Initial Q - Google Art Project.jpg, which although just one letter, would definitely be copyrighted if it weren't way way way too old for copyright. Nyttend (talk) 01:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Uploader is probably not the copyright owner. discospinster (talk) 19:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, journal covers are usually protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
COM:IDENT. Photo of a child which appears to have been taken in a private place, no evidence of consent from subject/parents. January (talk) 19:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
This is my little brother in the picture and my parents have given consent to me uploading this to Wikipedia Commons. Do I need they need to fill something out to show that they have given consent?
Deleted, exact copy of File:Child with autism and monotropism.jpg. (But do not nominate the other photo for deletion, I am against.) Taivo (talk) 15:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Was intended to be a test-upload for SVG testing Xgeorg (talk) 19:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:05, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, no camera EXIF, on various websites before Commons (e.g., here), no evidence photographer transferred rights to Uddikar and, even if they did, unused and non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 19:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
The image appears on an article dated May 2003. Jespinos (talk) 19:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, unused small photo with no metadata and bad quality. I consider this out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:41, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 21:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:09, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Logos are protected by copyright in Romania, and there's no proof that uploader owns the rights. // Gikü said done Monday, 18 November 2013 21:43 (UTC) 21:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete also copies File:Logoechipasoimul.jpg and File:Logosoimul.jpg. Taivo (talk) 12:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
superseded by File:Cinadiev fl.svg McZusatz (talk) 22:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:12, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
low quality image, commons is not facebook. The Photographer (talk) 22:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Estel Campistol --Nacida en Girona el 18 de septiembre de 1989, dedicada desde época muy temprana a la escritura se formó en distinguidos colegios de la ciudad, como tal, dando su agradecida experiencia, ded 2013-07-01 19-19.jpg
[edit]
low image quality, commons is not facebook. Null encyclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:54, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
File:انا مابيك انا مابيك- ولابي ذكرك وطاريك-- خساره فيك اشواقي- خساره اسمك على اوراقي-- خساره يوم حبيتك- خساره قلبي اهديتك- 2013-10-14 14-59.jpg
[edit]
Self promotion. Low quality image. Null encyclopedic value, Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:41, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
File:يتجاهلونني ويريدون ان اسأل عنهم-عفواً" انا لا اركض خلف الطيور المهاجرة 2013-10-12 16-48.jpg
[edit]
Self promotion. Low quality image. Null encyclopedic value, Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:43, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
File:ازكى من سنيكرز واحلى من التوت- واجمل من الامواج في بحر هادي-- الله عليك شلون مدرى ترى كيوت- يانرجس الاحساس وزهرة الكا 2013-10-14 14-58.jpg
[edit]
Self promotion. Low quality image. Null encyclopedic value, Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 23:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vertigo Business Tower in Sofia Bulevard Bulgaria 2012 PD 2.JPG. Eleassar (t/p) 11:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, not Bulgaria, but Ukraine. Learn cyrillic alphabet. No freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Taivo (talk) 21:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, File:Бизнес центр СКИФ Проект.jpg, File:Бизнес центр СКИФ ПРОЕКТ.jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Taivo (talk) 21:33, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Dubious own work, and the architecture is copyrighted. Eleassar (t/p) 11:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Taivo (talk) 21:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, not Bulgaria, but Ukraine. Learn cyrillic alphabet. No freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Taivo (talk) 21:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:47, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:50, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
![11:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/11/18#c-Eleassar-2013-11-18T11:27:00.000Z-File:Офис_сграда_"Витоша",_София.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
![22:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/11/18#c-Taivo-2013-11-23T22:06:00.000Z-File:Офис_сграда_"Витоша",_София.JPG){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:12, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
No location information, it doesn't show anything notable. Lack of educational value. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:15, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture and monument. Eleassar (t/p) 11:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:36, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bulgaria: non-free architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 11:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo with bad quality and maybe promotional contenr. Categorized in Spanish or similar language. The uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
![08:02, 18 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/11/18#c-Taivo-2013-11-18T08:02:00.000Z-File:Agustin_Nicolini_"el_hot"_.jpg){kind=link}
CommentThis is one of a whole group of images, all described in Spanish, which almost seems like someone in Central or South America is promoting the project as a great place to put autobiographies and fuzzy pictures.- Delete Here, I agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
![00:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2013/11/18#c-Jameslwoodward-2013-11-25T00:29:00.000Z-File:Agustin_Nicolini_"el_hot"_.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 08:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. BTW, this image contains a recognizable presumably living subject and the metadata shows it is a scan, not a photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Looks like advertisement, not own work. EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:45, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this comes from France or that the photographer has been dead for at least 70 years. Stefan4 (talk) 01:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- El fotógrafo es desconocido hasta donde se me alcanza, pero sí hay evidencia de que la foto proviene de Francia, pues es una foto del rodaje de La Edad de Oro. Escarlati (talk) 01:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- No hay evidencia que el fotógrafo es desconocido. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ni tampoco de quién es el fotógrafo. Pero sí hay evidencia respecto al lugar la foto proviene de Francia pues es del rodaje de La Edad de Oro. Escarlati (talk) 21:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Y hay fotógrafos de La Edad de Oro que murieron en 1980 o 1990. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Pero no se sabe quién es el fotógrafo. Y sin embargo, sí hay evidencia de que la foto proviene de Francia, pues es una foto del rodaje de La Edad de Oro. Te recuerdo que cuando abriste la consulta dijiste "There is no evidence that this comes from France". Esa afirmación es, a todas luces, falsa. Escarlati (talk) 00:36, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Y hay fotógrafos de La Edad de Oro que murieron en 1980 o 1990. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ni tampoco de quién es el fotógrafo. Pero sí hay evidencia respecto al lugar la foto proviene de Francia pues es del rodaje de La Edad de Oro. Escarlati (talk) 21:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- No hay evidencia que el fotógrafo es desconocido. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no evidence of where this image came from, but that is of no matter as 1930 is far too late to assume that the photographer has been dead for 70 (France) or 80 (Spain) years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:25, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
not OWN, but logo of www.confideri.com A5b (talk) 21:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Low image quality, self promotion. Non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 23:00, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
A higher resolution version of this image can be found here. There is no evidence the Flickr user is the copyright holder of the image. Jespinos (talk) 19:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:11, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo with bad quality. Out of scope. Also, the image in screen is problematic: this can be copyrighted. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:13, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
This is not original work of uploader. It is from Fingerhut's twitter feed see https://twitter.com/eric_fingerhut Roseohioresident (talk) 22:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
It appears to be a screenshot from a YouTube video (See video at 15 sec). Jespinos (talk) 17:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, the image appears at 15 seconds in the YouTube video. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:12, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion, low image quality. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 22:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. This is another of those autobiographical descriptions in Spanish. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Promotion, NULL encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 22:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Wrong license. This is no way simple logo. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- The festival has released all its content under cc by-sa. The license is on the festival website http://festivalafricano.altervista.org/festival/?doing_wp_cron=1384769001.1289670467376708984375. Here there is a case study about their contribution to Wikipedia and the Wikimedia projects and here is the case study about Nigrizia, one of the institutions supporting it (and deeply linked to the festival). There is a clear and full support for free licenses and the consistent use of cc by-sa on their documentation. The only reason I used the no copyright for the upload is because it was how I found a lot of other non registered/trademarked logos were uploaded on Wikimedia Commons; I thought it was the right way to put it. The content of the festival is under cc by-sa. we can simply change the no copyright to cc by-sa which is the license in use on all their documentation. thanks, --iopensa (talk) 10:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: {{Licensereview}} done . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Flickr - law keven - 365 Days - Day 286 - Moi - Come On England - Saturday October Thirteenth 2007.jpg
[edit]
Promotion, NULL encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 22:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Promotion, NULL encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 22:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion, null encyclopedic value. Commons is not Facebook The Photographer (talk) 22:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. This is another of those autobiographical descriptions in Spanish. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
While this isn't the image given in the "source" line, it's still not claimed as an own work. No evidence of permission. Nyttend (talk) 14:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:13, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
not own work, author died in 1990 Sealle (talk) 03:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Image comes from:http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=321027. Jespinos (talk) 20:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Italy TAV.png. bobrayner (talk) 20:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: keep the redirect McZusatz (talk) 20:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
low image quality, self promotion. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 22:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:59, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:13, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 21:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:42, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Non notable person who we have no article for. Suspect strongly just your average person. Was added as part of vandalism to page Livingston on en.wiki Blethering Scot (talk) 23:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio image with watermark. 129.42.208.179 02:00, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Yes watermarked, but also promotional reading the description this is basically an ad for their "services." Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted design Taivo (talk) 08:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Low quality image and non encyclopedic value. User page in pt is promotional The Photographer (talk) 22:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the photo was first published in the United States or even that it was published before 1923 in the first place. Stefan4 (talk) 01:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- There is also no evidence that it was not. The source identifies it as "c. 1920". The photograph is of a Bunuel who could very well be in his 20'th year, or younger (born 1900). Anything to the contrary is conjecture. Jburlinson (talk) 20:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- See COM:EVIDENCE: anyone claiming that the photo was published before 1923 needs to provide evidence that this claim is correct. An attempt to identify how old Buñuel is on the photo only helps identify the date of photography, not the date of first publication. You are also missing the other requirement of the template you used: you additionally need to show that the first publication of the photo was in the United States, which is unlikely for photographs of Spaniards. If it was instead first published in Spain, then you have to show that the photographer died more than 80 years ago. There is currently no information about the date of death of the photographer. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Stefan4 isa correct -- those who would keep an image must prove that it is PD beyond a significant doubt. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
This is obviously a photo of another photo. The copyright status of the underlying photo is unknown. Stefan4 (talk) 01:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- The image is licensed as cc by attribution 2.0 generic. There is no factual evidence that the stated author, henrivzq, is incorrect. Jburlinson (talk) 20:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- The Flickr user obviously only took a photo of a photograph at a museum, as shown by the tags on Flickr. There is no evidence that the Flickr user took the underlying photo which is hanging at the museum. If you are claiming that the Flickr user took that photo, then please provide evidence of this. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:38, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:07, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:38, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:07, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:38, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Promotion, NULL encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook. Low image quality The Photographer (talk) 22:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Possible, not OWN, the author says he doesn't work at "Confideri" company, he is student. Also, there is no EXIF data to prove "own" A5b (talk) 22:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Actually Copyvio from russian web-magazine www.the-village.ru/village/city/office/122891-ofis-nedeli-moskva-confideri - second gallery, image 6 of 8. There is a watermark on the image, "The Village" and site says: "© 2010–2013 The Village. Городское интернет-издание The Village. Новости Москвы, Санкт-Петербурга, Киева. Люди, места, события. Использование материалов The Village разрешено только с предварительного согласия правообладателей. Все права на картинки и тексты в разделе Новости принадлежат их авторам." - all rights reserved. `A5b (talk) 22:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:59, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
copyvio, most probably brands by weandthecolor.com/confideri-branding-by-arenas-lab/24065 A5b (talk) 21:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Taivo (talk) 08:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Or maybe somebody wants to keep it as illustration of waterdrops in face? Taivo (talk) 08:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. It was also previously published on Facebook according to its description. The user name of the uploader implies that he/she is working for a company while doing this. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Promotional The Photographer (talk) 22:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This is a low quality screenshot from the Portugese Wiki, the description is entirely a license statement. There are better images in the category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE: seemingly meaningless fragment of a larger page with no description or categorization. What is the educational purpose here? Эlcobbola talk 20:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 07:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
copyvio, brands by weandthecolor.com/confideri-branding-by-arenas-lab/24065 A5b (talk) 21:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Own profile image - for deletion (no longer give permission for use) Tl9380 (talk) 22:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: License is not revokable. -- Tuválkin ✉ 03:26, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Nomination text briefly changed to «Own profile image - for deletion (no longer in use on user page, no other use)» by 46.16.3.241 (talk · contribs) on 09:42, 22 November 2013, reverted. -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
- O’Really? That changes everything, I mean, it changes nothing: Any valid Commons license is not revokable. -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: out of com:scope: unused userpage image McZusatz (talk) 20:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
The same image can be found here with an upload date of April 2008. The Flickr image was uploaded to that site in 2009. Jespinos (talk) 20:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:10, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
not own work, author died in 1990 Sealle (talk) 03:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that this medal (sculptural work / work of design) is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 00:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, File:Vancouver 2010 Gold Medal Paralympic Games.jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 00:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Low image quality. Non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Low image quality. Non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 22:55, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion. Low quality image. Null encyclopedic value, Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 23:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE which also has privacy issues for the presumed living subjects. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion. Low quality image. Null encyclopedic value, Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego sculptures that depict copyrighted characters.
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted characters. The statues depicted are of characters that are currently under copyright.
- File:LEGO Batman.jpg
- File:LEGO Iron Man 3.jpg
- File:LEGO Man of Steel.jpg
- File:LEGO Star Wars trooper (3748585808).jpg
- File:Lego Swinging Friar.jpg
- File:Toys us defense lego 0002.jpg
- File:Toys us defense lego 0003.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
67.87.46.39 03:01, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Anonymous ips can make deletion requests? That's interesting. --Mjrmtg (talk) 03:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- It's ok, if they give a valid reason for deletion. --McZusatz (talk) 07:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Luis Buñuel
[edit]There is no evidence that the Flickr users hold the copyright to the films. The copyright would normally be held by the filmmaker's heirs, not by random Flickr users.
Stefan4 (talk) 01:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Romexpo
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Romania: non-free 1962 architecture.
- File:Exhibitions pavilion in Bucharest.jpg
- File:Romexpo during Construct Expo Utilaje 2010.jpg
- File:Romexpo.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 11:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Žalgirio Arena
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Lithuania: copyrighted architecture.
- File:AgroBalt 2012 - Arena.JPG
- File:Arena Kaune (nuo Minkovskių gatvės).JPG
- File:Kauno arena 2009-07-03.jpg
- File:Žalgirio Arena 01.JPG
- File:Žalgirio Arena 02.JPG
- File:Žalgiris Arena exterior 18 Aug 2011.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 11:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:26, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:Mohd Arshi.jpg
- File:Sartaj Ahmed Pic.jpg
- File:Akhilesh Yadav.jpg
- File:Yashpal Arya.jpg
- File:Harish Rawat.jpg
- File:NN Swami.jpg
- File:B S Koshiyari.jpg
- File:Ramesh Pokhriyal.jpg
- File:BC Khanduri.jpg
- File:Vijay Bahuguna.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gurminder Singh Bajwa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused user photos.
Stefan4 (talk) 14:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gurminder Singh Bajwa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentations of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
not his --94.221.89.219 16:01, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, a lot of quite small photos with no metadata. I do not believe own work. If you really photographed them yourself, please re-upload them with full resolution and provide them with metadata. Taivo (talk) 14:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:AnaMilosevic
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by user AnaMilosevic and not yet presented for deletion:
They are both unused personal files with bad quality. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)}}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:42, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:CUPJ
[edit]Here are both files, uploaded by user CUPJ and not yet deleted:
They are both unused and out of scope. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, these are unused personal images outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Lidia Duek
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by user Lidia Duek and not yet presented for deletion:
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-2005-1.jpg
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-2005-2.jpg
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-foto-april2008-3.jpg
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-foto-april2008-3-medium.jpg
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-foto-odisea.jpg*
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-frank-2-1959-60.jpg*
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-la-bomba-de-talco-1970.jpg *
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-la-valse.jpg*
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-lisandro-sosa-matrero.jpg*
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-lo-que-el-viento-se-landru.jpg*
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-pintando.jpg
- File:Carlos.g.groppa-trio.jpg *
- File:Groppa-680-pixels-voz-del-pueblo-cara.jpg
They are all claimed own work, but are small and have no metadata. Those marked with asterisk origin from fifties until seventies, so "own work" is dubious. Taivo (talk)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:40, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
not own work, author died in 1990 Sealle (talk) 03:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. Yann (talk) 10:57, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
The uploader claimed, that this is work of unknown artist from XX century. Maybe. But that case the license can be false: how do we know, that author is 70 years dead? Also, I am not sure, that the work is anonymous. Suspected copyright violation Taivo (talk) 10:07, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Work done 1914-1919, artist died 1924 . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Watermark with name Culex (talk) 09:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Speedy keep. Not a reason for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 10:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Per COM:URAA, this stamp is not free. On 1 January 1996, it was still copyrighted in Germany, the source country. Eleassar (t/p) 10:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bosnia and Herzegovina: copyrighted photo and the design of the clock. Eleassar (t/p) 10:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Bosnia and Herzegovina: copyrighted architecture. Eleassar (t/p) 10:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
not own work, fake license Sealle (talk) 11:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
1988 medal, designed by Friedrich Peter. Taken in the United States: no FOP for sculptural works. Eleassar (t/p) 13:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, File:1988 Calgary Olympic Winter Games, Gold Meadl, Bonnie Blair Cruikshank, Speedskating 500 meter.jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:45, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
File:1992 Albertville Olympic Winter Games, Gold Medal, Bonnie Blair; Speedskating 500 meter.jpg
[edit]
Designed by Marie-Claude Lalique. Taken in the United States: no FOP for sculptural works. Eleassar (t/p) 13:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, File:1992 Albertville Olympic Winter Games, Gold Medal, crop.jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
File:1994 Lillehammer Olympic Winter Games, Gold Meadl, Bonnie Blair Cruikshank, Speedskating 500 meter.jpg
[edit]
Designed by Ingjerd Hanevold. Taken in the United States: no FOP for sculptural works. Eleassar (t/p) 13:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Also, File:1994 Lillehammer Olympic Winter Games, Gold Medal, Bonnie Blair, Speedskating 1000 meter.jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Designed by V. Falierus, Knut Yran. Taken in the United States: no FOP for sculptural works. Eleassar (t/p) 13:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Designed by Martha Coufal-Hartl. Taken in the United States: no FOP for sculptural works. Eleassar (t/p) 13:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Designed by Wojciech Pietranik. Taken in the United States: no FOP for sculptural works. Eleassar (t/p) 13:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
1980 medal, designed by Giuseppe Casiroli (front); Ilya Postol (back). No information about where the photo was taken, but presumably in Russia: there is no FOP in Russia. Could be cropped to only the back side. Eleassar (t/p) 13:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
The medals were designed by Giuseppe Casiroli, Ilya Postol and possibly others. No information about where the photo was taken, but presumably in Russia: there is no FOP in Russia. Eleassar (t/p) 13:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Designed by Omer Arbel (front); Corinne Hunt (back). No information about where the photo was taken, but originally posted by 'US Embassy Sweden': there's no FOP in Sweden for objects placed indoors. Eleassar (t/p) 13:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Unknown designer of this 1998 Olympic medal from Nagano. Taken in the Czech Republic: there is no FOP in the Czech Republic for indoor places, or in the best case the FOP for indoor places in the Czech Republic is unclear > per COM:PRP defaults to delete Eleassar (t/p) 13:55, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
The photo with the medal, designed by David Watkin, has been taken in London, and is not covered by the FOP, as the medal has not been permanently placed in a public space or premise. Per COM:DM, it is 'very unlikely de minimis': "Copyrighted work X is a key part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work radically different, but potentially still useful... Example: File:Carla del Ponte Mladic 1.jpg... Example: File:Mario Bros with Cube - Graffiti.JPG..." It should also be noted that the photo has been used to illustrate the terms 'gold' and 'gold medal'. Eleassar (t/p) 13:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Keep - I belive Urška Žolnir is in the focus and the image was originaly used only to illustrate her, also details on the medal are not visible quite so well. Which is why the image was already kept at the previous DR Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:2012 Summer Olympics medals, yet you have created another DR with the same rationale. --Sporti (talk) 14:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- It has been stated in the previous DR that this image may not be de minimis, which means we shouldn't host it. The design is visible enough to be clearly recognisable. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Not to say that, in regard to the photo, per Article 101, the copyright is transferred to the employer only for 10 years and is then returned to the employee (or former employee) and that it can't be transfered further to third parties without an explicit clause about this in the contract, which we don't have any evidence about.[1] --Eleassar (t/p) 15:55, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Was already kept here. No new arguments given. Anatoliy (talk) 19:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Reopened: there is a new argument in regard to the photograph and the discussion should last at least 7 days: per Article 101 of the Slovene copyright act, the copyright is transferred to the employer only for 10 years and is then returned to the employee (or former employee) and that it can't be transfered further to third parties without an explicit clause about this in the contract, which we don't have any evidence about.[2] --Eleassar (t/p) 20:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Additionally, the photo has evidently not been taken in the United Kingdom, but in Slovenia.[3] We should therefore evaluate its copyright status by taking COM:DM#Slovenia into consideration. This text has also been added only recently: Article 52 has been interpreted by the copyright expert Miha Trampuž in his book Copyright and Related Rights Act with Commentary (COBISS 67538432). He has stressed the following aspects: the work must have been disclosed, it must have been incidental with another object or work, it could be at will replaced with another work, and it is inessential in the copyright sense to the object or the work. It is clear that this medal is not incidental and could not be at will replaced with another work. --Eleassar (t/p) 20:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
![[3]](https://www.google.si/search?q=ur%C5%A1ka+%C5%BEolnir+medal&client=firefox-a&hs=ykC&rls=org.mozilla:sl:official&channel=fflb&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=cX6KUqyRL6j54QTBpoHwBA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1366&bih=638#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=oM_nKOT1b9LNwM%3A%3BI4IAz0fc-d-cTM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fus.123rf.com%252F400wm%252F400%252F400%252Famadea%252Famadea1208%252Famadea120800014%252F14819393-brnik-slovenia-august-5-urska-zolnir-comming-bach-from-olimpic-games-in-london-on-august-05-2012-brn.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.123rf.com%252Fphoto_14819393_brnik-slovenia-august-5-urska-zolnir-comming-bach-from-olimpic-games-in-london-on-august-05-2012-brn.html%3B1200%3B801){kind=link}
Kept: At this resolution, with the medal slightly out of focus, I can see nothing but lines crossing on the medal. I think we are safe with this one. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
The medal has been designed by Omer Arbel. The photo has been taken when the medal was temporarily on display in a town hall in Germany. There is no FOP in Germany for temporarily exhibited and indoors-placed objects of sculpture or design. Eleassar (t/p) 13:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
The uploader's only other contribution, File:IIMAUSSAQ FIELD.JPG, has licensing problems (it's attributed to someone else), and I'm not particularly inclined to trust the uploader's statement that this is an own work: it's used at en:User:AMObuz/sandbox, which has wording that makes me think that this is uploaded in connection with AMObuz' company, rather than being an own work by the uploader. Nyttend (talk) 14:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Memorial was opened in August 25, 2006 and author uk:Гайдамака Анатолій Васильович is alive. BaseSat (talk) 14:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, the monument consists of a simple ionic column (without any particular features, and in any case details are not visible on the photo) and a coat of arms of Ukraine ({{PD-UA-exempt}}). There is hardly anything copyrightable in this monument — NickK (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: As a rule, sculpture does not have a ToO. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
_006.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_006.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine and the monument was built in 2002, sculptor is alive BaseSat (talk) 14:55, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
_006.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
_006.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine and the monument was built in 1990. BaseSat (talk) 14:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
_1922_par_Oricelly_(ph._%C3%A0_Paris)_m%C3%A9daillon.jpg){kind=link}
_1922_par_Oricelly_(ph._%C3%A0_Paris)_m%C3%A9daillon.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"photographer Oricelly" : who is he ? when did he dies ? perhaps PD, but for now not enought informations --MGuf (d) 17:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
_1922_par_Oricelly_(ph._à_Paris)_médaillon.jpg){kind=link}
- I confirm : Delete, not old enought to be PD-old, nobody knows who is Oricelly and when he dies. ----MGuf (d) 12:36, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Oricelly (sans prénom) est un photographe professionnel dont le cachet indique : 25-27 rue Tronchet PARIS ayant pris des photos de la famille Ucciani, Bégard et Baudy entre 1902 et 1922/23 (à vérifier).
- Oricelly is a professionnal photographer; on his stamp it's written "25-27 rue Tronchet PARIS"; he takes pictures of Ucciani, Bégard and Baudy families, from 1902 to 1923
- Ok, but we need his written authorisation by OTRS he put his work under free license; or he dies before 1942, and his work is Public Domain, we need to know that. ----MGuf (d) 08:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Bonjour, Oricelly est photographe professionnel, 23-27 rue Trochet à Paris Il est cité sur Galica dès 1892 (photo de Clémentine de Belgique) Il avait certainement plus de 30 ans en 1892, plus de 90 ans en 1942… Je recherche sa date de décès --Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk) 08:42, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
_1922_par_Oricelly_(ph._à_Paris)_médaillon.jpg){kind=link}
Bonjour,
Si Wikimedia décide de conserver ce document comme libre de droit, ou considère que j'ai le droit d'en disposer, je demande qu'il soit versé dans les dossiers Wikimedia, libre de droits {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}}.
note : je pensais que le logo ci-dessous CC-BY-SA le faisat d'office.
Cordialement
--Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk) 11:20, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
_1922_par_Oricelly_(ph._à_Paris)_médaillon.jpg){kind=link}
- Vous ne pouvez pas décider que ce document passera en CC-By-SA, vous n'en détenez pas les droits ! Vous ne pouvez pas vous réclamer comme descendant de Oricelly (via le bandeau {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}}) car vous ne l'êtes pas ! Ce sont aux héritiers Oricely d'en décider. Ou alors vous connaissez la date de mort de ce photographe, et ça sera dans le domaine public en temps utile.
- L'expression "fr:libre de droits a un tout autre sens que fr:licence libre, et il vaut mieux éviter d'utiliser e terme, au mieux flou et erroné, au pire totalement hors sujet.
- En conséquence "versé dans les dossiers Wikimedia, libre de droits" n'a absolument aucun sens...
- Les différents fichiers que vous avez téléchargé ont des statuts différent, il ne faut pas tout mélanger :
- ceux créés par Pierre Ucciani : domaine public
- ceux créés par Oricelly : statut incertain, en l'abcence de la date de sa mort
- ceux crées par Marie-Renée ou Georges : en tant qu'héritier, vous avez le pouvoir de les mettre sous licence libre compatible (CC-By-SA, via la syntaxe {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}} à mettre par vous sur les pages des fichiers en question.
- Cordialement, ----MGuf (d) 12:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No serious doubt that it is in the public domain. Yann (talk) 11:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
_1922_par_Oricelly_(ph._à_Paris)_médaillon.jpg){kind=link}
_1910_Pierre_(Oricelly)_c1_PLM.jpg){kind=link}
_1910_Pierre_(Oricelly)_c1_PLM.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"photographer Oricelly" : who is he ? when did he dies ? perhaps PD, but for now not enought informations --MGuf (d) 17:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
_1910_Pierre_(Oricelly)_c1_PLM.jpg){kind=link}
- I confirm : Delete, not old enought to be PD-old, nobody knows who is Oricelly and when he dies. ----MGuf (d) 12:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Oricelly (sans prénom) est un photographe professionnel dont le cachet indique : 25-27 rue Tronchet PARIS ayant pris des photos de la famille Ucciani, Bégard et Baudy entre 1902 et 1922/23 (à vérifier).
- --Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk) 07:45, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oricelly is a professionnal photographer; on his stamp it's written "25-27 rue Tronchet PARIS"; he takes pictures of Ucciani, Bégard and Baudy families, from 1902 to 1923
- Ok, but we need his written authorisation by OTRS he put his work under free license; or he dies before 1942, and his work is Public Domain, we need to know that. ----MGuf (d) 08:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Bonjour, Oricelly est photographe professionnel, 23-27 rue Tronchet à Paris Il est cité sur Galica dès 1892 (photo de Clémentine de Belgique) Il avait certainement plus de 30 ans en 1892, plus de 90 ans en 1942… Je recherche sa date de décès --Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk) 08:49, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
_1910_Pierre_(Oricelly)_c1_PLM.jpg){kind=link}
Bonjour, Si Wikimedia décide de conserver ce document comme libre de droit, ou considère que j'ai le droit d'en disposer, je demande qu'il soit versé dans les dossiers Wikimedia, libre de droits {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}}. note : je pensais que le logo ci-dessous CC-BY-SA le faisait d'office. Cordialement --Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
_1910_Pierre_(Oricelly)_c1_PLM.jpg){kind=link}
- Vous ne pouvez pas décider que ce document passera en CC-By-SA, vous n'en détenez pas les droits ! Vous ne pouvez pas vous réclamer comme descendant de Oricelly (via le bandeau {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}}) car vous ne l'êtes pas ! Ce sont aux héritiers Oricely d'en décider. Ou alors vous connaissez la date de mort de ce photographe, et ça sera dans le domaine public en temps utile.
- L'expression "fr:libre de droits a un tout autre sens que fr:licence libre, et il vaut mieux éviter d'utiliser e terme, au mieux flou et erroné, au pire totalement hors sujet.
- En conséquence "versé dans les dossiers Wikimedia, libre de droits" n'a absolument aucun sens...
- Les différents fichiers que vous avez téléchargé ont des statuts différent, il ne faut pas tout mélanger :
- ceux créés par Pierre Ucciani : domaine public
- ceux créés par Oricelly : statut incertain, en l'abcence de la date de sa mort
- ceux crées par Marie-Renée ou Georges : en tant qu'héritier, vous avez le pouvoir de les mettre sous licence libre compatible (CC-By-SA, via la syntaxe {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}} à mettre par vous sur les pages des fichiers en question.
- Cordialement, ----MGuf (d) 12:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No serious doubt that it is in the public domain. Yann (talk) 11:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
_1910_Pierre_(Oricelly)_c1_PLM.jpg){kind=link}
_1918_peint_sa_fille_Georgette_(Villers)_PDLM_S1_W.jpg){kind=link}
_1918_peint_sa_fille_Georgette_(Villers)_PDLM_S1_W.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unknow author, unknow date, unknow licence --MGuf (d) 17:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
_1918_peint_sa_fille_Georgette_(Villers)_PDLM_S1_W.jpg){kind=link}
- Ok. Now, we know it's a selfportrait, the author is the grand-mother of uploader Pierre-Do Lo Meo. He is ok to put this work with CC-By-SA license. He is trying to put the syntax "{{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}}" on the file, we just need to wait he achieve that... So, for me Keep. ----MGuf (d) 12:51, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Marie-Renée Ucciani possède dès 1899 un appareil photo amateur avec lequel elle va, avec sa famille réaliser de nombreuses photos. Cette photo est certainement prise avec son appareil et il est impossible de savoir celles qui sont prises avec un autre appareil photographique amateur, et par une personne étrangère.
--Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk) 07:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
_1918_peint_sa_fille_Georgette_(Villers)_PDLM_S1_W.jpg){kind=link}
- Probably a selfportrait taken by Marie-Renée Ucciani; not possible to know wich pictures of this period were taken by Marie-Renée Ucciani or someone else
- Ok. Pierre-Do Lo Meo, can you put the syntax {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}} on the file : the meaning is: "me heir, I put this work of my grandmother under CC-By-SA licence". Pierre-Do, il faudrait que tu mettes la syntaxe {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}} sur le fichier, ce qui veux dire "moi, héritier, je place le travail de ma grand-mère sous licence CC-By-SA" (et que tu as bien compris qu'avec cette licence, tout le monde peut reprendre ce travail, sans te redemander, pour tous usages y compris commerciaux, y compris travaux dérivés) ----MGuf (d) 08:38, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Bonjour, Marie-Renée Ucciani peint sa fille Georgette dans le jardin de leur maison à Villers-sur-Mer. Le photographe est Georges Baudy, son époux (négatifs dans la famille). Georges Baudy (1878 +1960), divorcé en 1928 de Marie-Renée Ucciani (1883 +1963), parents de Georgette Baudy (1904 +2001) et Andrée Baudy (1906 +1908) Ma sœur, Francine Rousseau, née Lo Méo, et moi, en sommes les seuls héritiers. --Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk) 08:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
_1918_peint_sa_fille_Georgette_(Villers)_PDLM_S1_W.jpg){kind=link}
Bonjour, En tant qu'héritier de Pierre Ucciani, Marie-Renée Ucciani, de Georges Baudy et Georgette baudy, je demande que cette photo soit versé au fonds de Wikmedia Commons {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}}. --Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk) 07:32, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
_1918_peint_sa_fille_Georgette_(Villers)_PDLM_S1_W.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 11:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
_1918_peint_sa_fille_Georgette_(Villers)_PDLM_S1_W.jpg){kind=link}
File:Ucciani.M-R (sculpt) 1935 sa fille Georgette, buste, séance de pose(Neuilly) PDLM S1 W.jpeg
[edit]_1935_sa_fille_Georgette,_buste,_s%C3%A9ance_de_pose(Neuilly)_PDLM_S1_W.jpeg){kind=link}
_1935_sa_fille_Georgette,_buste,_s%C3%A9ance_de_pose(Neuilly)_PDLM_S1_W.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unknow author, unknow license --MGuf (d) 17:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. Now, we know the subject is the grand-mother of uploader Pierre-Do Lo Meo Marie-Renée Ucciani: she is the sculptor, and the photographer (selportrait). Pierre-Do Lo Meo is ok to put this work with CC-By-SA license. He is trying to put the syntax "{{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}}" on the file, we just need to wait he achieve that... So, for me Keep. ----MGuf (d) 12:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Marie-Renée Ucciani possède dès 1899 un appareil photo amateur avec lequel elle va, avec sa famille réaliser de nombreuses photos. Cette photo est certainement prise avec son appareil et il est impossible de savoir celles qui sont prises avec un autre appareil photographique amateur, et par une personne étrangère.
Et c'est également une photo amateur. --Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk) 08:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Probably a selfportrait taken by Marie-Renée Ucciani; not possible to know wich pictures of this period were taken by Marie-Renée Ucciani or someone else
- Ok. Pierre-Do Lo Meo, can you put the syntax {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}} on the file : the meaning is: "me heir, I put this work of my grandmother under CC-By-SA licence". Pierre-Do, il faudrait que tu mettes la syntaxe {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}} sur le fichier, ce qui veux dire "moi, héritier, je place le travail de ma grand-mère sous licence CC-By-SA" (et que tu as bien compris qu'avec cette licence, tout le monde peut reprendre ce travail, sans te redemander, pour tous usages y compris commerciaux, y compris travaux dérivés) ----MGuf (d) 08:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Bonjour, Marie-Renée Ucciani fait le buste de sa fille Georgette dans l’atelier de Georges Bénet, pavillon St Antoine, 9 villa des Camélias, Paris 14°, comme le montre la sculpture « Beethoven, hommage funèbre d’un héro » (erratum : et non à Neuilly chez son père Pierre Ucciani). La photo est prise par Marie-Renée Ucciani (négatifs dans la famille) Georges Baudy (1878 +1960), divorcé de Marie-Renée Ucciani (1883 +1963), parents de Georgette Baudy (1904 +2001) et Andrée Baudy (1906 +1908) Ma sœur, Francine Rousseau, née Lo Méo, et moi, en sommes les seuls héritiers. --Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk) 09:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Je demande que cette photo soit mise sous license {{CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs}} --Pierre-Do Lo Meo (talk) 05:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Tu n'as donc rien lu de tout ce que je t'ai écrit hier soir ! Le modèle que tu as introduit ici (et donc j'ai du modifier la syntaxe pour que cette page de demande de suppression ne soit pas catégorisée CC-BY-SA-3.0-heirs) doit être mis sur la page où il y a la photo, la page du fichier, celle là : File:Ucciani.M-R (sculpt) 1935 sa fille Georgette, buste, séance de pose(Neuilly) PDLM S1 W.jpeg.
- Sur la page de demande de suppression tu "plaides", et fait valoir pourquoi elle ne devrait pas être supprimmée. Les informations valables (description, sources, licences, dates... mais pas de signature) doivent être mises sur les pages des photos.
- ----MGuf (d) 08:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 11:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
the low resolution suggest that this website was the original source Vera (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
the date 25 de octubre de 2012 is obviously wrong, I doubt authorship of Cea 188.62.9.30 21:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- This photo looks like a professional work. Marianne Faithful was 2012 an old woman. --188.62.9.30 21:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Si mal no recuerdo para esa fecha del 25 de octubre de 2012 subí ese archivo, porque contaba con una licencia {{cc-by-2.0}} en el sitio Flickr. Y fue avalada por el bot FlickreviewR, que dio el visto bueno, como se puede ver debajo de la licencia en la página del archivo. Posteriormente cambiaron la licencia desde el sitio en mención. No entiendo por qué ese vaivén y falta de claridad, como seriedad por las licencias en Flickr, así como en Commons que también está a la deriva de los permisos.--Ninrouter (talk) 02:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: This is probably Flickrwashing -- the Flickr user does not own the rights to license it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Personality right? see also File:Kong Kids 01.png, same issue. Yann (talk) 21:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by INeverCry. Yann (talk) 11:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that this representation of the coat of arms was published before 1923. Stefan4 (talk) 13:15, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- It's too old, the University was created in the 1200s. This is an interpretation of the blazon which is ancient. Keep Fry1989 eh? 20:21, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Please provide a source for your claim. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- For which claim? That the university is nearly 1000 years old? Or that because of the extreme age, nearly any rendition of the coat of arms would be out of copyright? Fry1989 eh? 23:14, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- There is no evidence that this rendition of the coat of arms is old. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Nor is there any that it is not. So you have to make an educated guess, and with 900 years leaning on the side of "not", that's my guess. You don't have to agree but you're not gonna make me change my guess. Fry1989 eh? 22:05, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Per COM:PCP, we have to assume that this is a recent rendition unless you find evidence of the opposite. Compare with File:Cambridge shield.png by User:Lupin and File:Cambridge University Crest - flat.png by w:User:Prisonblues which are obviously recent renditions as the artists were still alive when Wikipedia was founded. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- I have made my vote based on known facts regarding the age of the university and the principle of probability, and it's not changing. Fry1989 eh? 20:43, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Per COM:PCP, we have to assume that this is a recent rendition unless you find evidence of the opposite. Compare with File:Cambridge shield.png by User:Lupin and File:Cambridge University Crest - flat.png by w:User:Prisonblues which are obviously recent renditions as the artists were still alive when Wikipedia was founded. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Nor is there any that it is not. So you have to make an educated guess, and with 900 years leaning on the side of "not", that's my guess. You don't have to agree but you're not gonna make me change my guess. Fry1989 eh? 22:05, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- There is no evidence that this rendition of the coat of arms is old. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- For which claim? That the university is nearly 1000 years old? Or that because of the extreme age, nearly any rendition of the coat of arms would be out of copyright? Fry1989 eh? 23:14, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please provide a source for your claim. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Delete The fact that this drawing is not a scan but a computer generated rendition makes the probability of a work old enough to be out of copyright very weak. Unless it can be proven that this file is PD, COM:PCP must apply. Kathisma (talk) 21:30, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- There's no proof of that, it's heavily cropped and could just as easily be enhanced than not. Fry1989 eh? 00:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: I'm closing this because it is stale. A keep position is suggested by the University of Cambridge's site which itself dates the coat of arms to 1573. Эlcobbola talk 21:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Invalid keep closure: the page https://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/offices/communications/services/trademark/about/coat.html only identifies the age of the textual representation of the coat of arms, not this graphical representation of the coat of arms. The age of the textual representation of a coat of arms is unrelated to the copyright status of a graphical representation of the coat of arms, see COM:COA. Stefan4 (talk) 21:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per closure. Text of "The University of Cambridge was granted its arms in 1573 by Robert Cooke, Clarenceux King of Arms and a graduate of St. John's College, for use by the Chancellor, Masters, Fellows and Scholars as a corporate body" does not apply to or say anything about the "textual representation". The textual description later in the page is a formality on how one would render the visual coat of arms into English, see here for example. See also the history here. Эlcobbola talk 21:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- When the linked pages write "the coat of arms", they refer to the textual representation, not to any graphical representation of it. The graphical representation is just a way to represent the coat of arms as an artwork and is not the form in which a coat of arms is granted. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per last DR, nothing new. Fry1989 eh? 21:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. Yann (talk) 11:34, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
This file should actually be speedily deleted as clear copyright violation as it is taken from Cambridge University's logo that is trademarked, but I'm nominating it again because of the previous deletion nominations were closed as "kept" by admins who did not properly understand the guidelines on copyright of coats of arms, NOR did they understand the protection of United States copyright law, and there was no clear consensus. I apologize for the length, but there is clearly some confusion that this would be "kept" twice.
First, this violates Commons own policy per COM:COA:
Do not upload coats of arms or their derivatives directly from the web or official registries. Coats of arms drawn by users based solely on the definition (blazon) without any reference to the original drawing (representation) are usually safe for upload.
Second, putting this logo on Commons is a violation of United States law. Please see Wikipedia's own article, Law of heraldic arms with the section about the United States, which discusses this exact scenario:
A specific rendition of a coat of arms is protected through copyright law and a coat of arms can be used as a trademark and will thus be protected by trademark law. For example, the University of Texas at Austin has registered its emblem and coat of arms for use in its capacity as an institution of higher education. Moreover, such protection presumes a specific graphic design or work of art, while blazon is a description which may be widely interpreted artistically.
This is exactly the situation here. We have many other versions of the Cambridge arms created by users, but we cannot take arms that have been copyrighted as a specific work of art, no matter how old the blazon is.
I don't know the UK's copyright law on coats of arms but it is very safe to say it would also be a UK copyright violation to put this on Commons, as this is part of a trademarked logo. This SVG file is taken directly from the Cambridge University Press logo uploaded to Wikipedia in 2011 under the Non-free use rationale guideline, and it does not qualify to be on Commons. Simply cropping out the text does not make it eligible to be uploaded to Commons! The description of the logo on Wikipedia states it was taken from a PDF of an annual report, and note it is in vector format. This means it was a vector version created by a modern artist today somewhere on a computer for the University, and neither that artist nor the University of Cambridge have released it under a CC license that would make it eligible for Commons. To the contrary: The University has copyrighted this logo - look at their brand resources page and logo usage page and note that the actual page with the logo downloads is only accessible to people who have an online account with Cambridge. The copyright of their logo is VERY CLEAR on their Trademark and Licensing page:
"The University of Cambridge name and Coat of Arms not only form a key role in the internal branding of the University, but they also represent the reputation of the University externally and internationally. For example, they identify official publications, presentations and websites. As such they have significant commercial value. By trade-marking these assets, the University is able to protect itself against those who wish to benefit from its reputation by falsely implying association with the University through the use of the name and/or Coat of Arms. It also gives the University control over how its name is used on commercial products."
The general copyright rules about heraldry mean that artists are free to design THEIR OWN RENDITION of other people's coats of arms and upload it to Commons. It does not mean that OTHER PEOPLE's RENDITIONS of the coats of arms are not copyrighted to them, because they certainly are. Renditions of coats of arms that are still held under copyright (including as part of a logo) are not eligible to be on Commons. Think about it this way - blazons for coats of arms are just descriptions of what it would look like, ie color, items, placement. People create their own interpretation of these items (ie a rose, a cross, a lion). The Web is full of coats of arms that people have designed and put online that we would never be allowed to upload. Think about it this way: if Andy Warhol had painted his rendition of the Cambridge University's coat of arms, based on the university's blazon, would it be allowed on Commons? It would be speedily deleted in 2 seconds. The same applies here.
So to summarize, there are probably hundreds of versions of this coat of arms that various artists have created, and each version is copyrighted to those artists. We already have many versions on Commons that artists have designed and uploaded (see Category:Coats of arms of the University of Cambridge. Further examples of renditions of the coat of arms we can use:
- Here are two examples of a Cambridge University coat of arms we are eligible to use - taken from an 1888 book now on Internet Archive.
- Version from 1909-1910 university calendar.
But we can't even put this version on Commmons - please see page 4 of this booklet on the arms of Cambridge University, from 1931. Notice how it is the same arms, but tt's dramatically different. Even THAT version, from 1931, can't be uploaded to Commons under US-1923! So one that was designed much more recently and is very clearly and specifically held under strict copyright by the university of Cambridge, certainly fails the standard and should be speedily deleted. Wikimandia (talk) 00:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Same bollocks as the last 2 times. Fry1989 eh? 00:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Please cite an actual Wikimedia policy to support your claim. Your previous argument was in direct conflict of COM:COA. It really could not be more clear: new renditions of old blazons cannot be taken from other sources. Cambridge University has clear copyright and trademark over its logo, including the coat of arms. We are not eligible to take THAT VERSION of their arms (and it certainly fails the claim that it was published prior to 1923). That's not how Commons Guidelines on heraldry work, and furthermore, it is a violation of U.S. law, which Wikimedia complies with. Wikimandia (talk) 01:08, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete
WP:COACOM:COA is quite clear that renditions of a coat of arms have copyright attached, and this rendition is AFAIK recent (1990s, I think). The cross and book are arguably below COM:TOO, but the lions are very different from all other renditions of the University arms that I've seen. Declaration of interest: I'm an officer of the University, albeit nowhere near the relevant part. --bjh21 (talk) 11:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC) - I've loaded this SVG into Inkscape alongside the official PDF version of the University identifier. The points on the various Bézier paths are in the same places on the two versions. This version and the official PDF must have come from the same vector source. --bjh21 (talk) 11:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I've found a few different historical renditions of this coat of arms, and none of the old ones match this version. This is almost certainly recent and therefore copyrighted. It is indeed a close match to the fair use image on Wikipedia. --Guanaco (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
I am sorry, but this seems to be a recent work (dated 2004 at the bottom pof the relief) and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, Romania has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Per the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Euro coins (2 cents): copyrighted national side of an euro coin as well as copyrighted photograph. Eleassar (t/p) 21:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
COM:FOP#France. 84.61.176.82 20:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Invocation de la loi DAVDSI de 2006 concernant les prises de vue à but d'information immédiate et sans but lucratif.--Mirasol (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peace and Friendship Stadium
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Greece: copyrighted architecture.
- File:Peace and friendship.JPG
- File:Peiraias Stadion Pokoju i Przyjazni.jpg
- File:Stadio Irinis kai Filias.jpg
- File:VolleyballAt2004SummerOlympics-2.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 11:13, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peace and Friendship Stadium
[edit]No COM:FOP in Greece per COM:FOP Greece. Subject is a 1985 building designed by Thymios Papagiannis and Associates. Even if we assume that the architect died when the building began construction in 1983, it would still be copyrighted until 2054 (1983+70+1).
- File:Peace and Friendship Stadium 2007.jpg
- File:Peace and Friendship stadium 2014 (cropped).JPG
- File:Peace and Friendship stadium 2014.JPG
- File:Peace and Friendship Stadium Athens.JPG
- File:Stadio Irinis ke Filias (5987135038).jpg
- File:Στάδιο Ειρήνης και Φιλίας.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:35, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Move File:Peace and Friendship stadium 2014.JPG to en.WP as fair use (crop/reduce resolution if absolutely required) currently validly used on at least two en.WP articles ([4], [5]; no opinion on the others. RandomCanadian (talk) 21:55, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: I don't understand why this was not moved to WP as fair use. RandomCanadian (talk) 21:13, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- RandomCanadian, it is not the responsibility of closing Admins to move files to WP -- if you wanted them moved to WP, you should have done it yourself. This DR was open for six weeks -- there was certainly plenty of opportunity to do so. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not aware of the formalities of Commons, and it's usually the job of the closer to do any actions that need to be taken as a result of their closure. Now please spare me the trouble of having to request the file be temporarily undeleted, will you? RandomCanadian (talk) 12:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stadiums in Yekaterinburg
[edit]These photos from Category:Stadiums in Yekaterinburg depict Yekaterinburg stadiums:
- File:Central_Stadium_scoreboard_(Yekaterinburg).jpg
- File:Estadio_Centrale.jpg
- File:EstadioCentral.jpg
- File:Панорама (116)a8.jpg
- File:СтадионЦентральный.JPG
- File:Центральный.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
a8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Happyday92
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by user Happyday92 and not yet presented for deletion:
- File:Centro direzionale.jpg
- File:Centro direzionale torre diamante.jpg
- File:Cesar Pelli A.jpg
- File:Garibaldi accesso.jpg
- File:Grattacieli Garibaldi.jpg
- File:Milano Repubblica - Passante suburbano.jpg
- File:Porta Nuova diamante.jpg
- File:Porta Nuova diamante 2.jpg
- File:Torre Diamante porta nuova.jpg
- File:Torre diamante - Porta nuova.jpg
All these buildings are apparently modern, but there is no freedom of panorama in Italy. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Katherine Vera
[edit]User Katherine Vera uploaded these photos:
- File:Anexos.jpg
- File:Anexoss.jpg
- File:Anexosss.jpg
- File:EQUINOTERAPIA.jpg
- File:EQUINOTERAPIAA.jpg
- File:EQUINOTERAPIAAA.jpg *
- File:Hipoterapia.jpg
- File:TRABAJOS GRUPALES.jpg
- File:TRABAJOS GRUPALESS.jpg
- File:TRABAJOS GRUPALESSS.jpg
Mostly they depict groups of non-notable people. A lot of photos are described with word "Equinoterapia" or "Hipoterapia", which means therapy using horses. Nevertheless, there is no horse in prominent place. The photo with asterisk consists a horse, but no patient. Therefore I think, that all these photos are out of scope. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Prince nexio
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by User Prince nexio and not yet presented for deletion:
They are all out of scope. Files have no description, they depict non-notable persons (photo about sun has no description and is small). Taivo (talk) 12:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: All except one, which in scope. Yann (talk) 11:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Валерія
[edit]User Валерія has uploaded these photos:
They depict modern sculptures, but there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. So they violate sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jameslwoodward Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:عبدالاله السقراط
[edit]Here are all photos, uploaded by User عبدالاله السقراط and not yet presented for deletion:
- File:عبد الاله السقراط انا.jpg
- File:عبدالاله السقراط السقراط2.jpg
- File:Photoعبدالاله السقراط.jpg
- File:هذه صورتي انا عبدالاله السقراط ابدوي.jpg
- File:انا عبدالاله السقراط.JPG
- File:السقراط انا عبدالاله السقراط.jpg
First group. Here is the same photo in different settings. Non-notable person, out of scope.
- File:تراث يمني تعزي.JPG
- File:بنت من تعز صبر.jpg
- File:عيشة الريف.JPG
- File:صبر اليمن.jpg
- File:حنين المفارق اغنيه ل ايوب طارش.gif
- File:صور متحركه تراثيه يمني.gif
- File:الفنانه منى علي.jpg
- File:صور من تعز اليمن.gif
Secound group. Here are effects of mirror. Photos are still small, unused and they have no metadata. Out of scope.
- File:قدس مصور من بني حماد.jpg
- File:مناظر من تعز حاملات الشريم.gif
- File:بنات من تعز.JPG
- File:بائعات القات.JPG
- File:Aنساء محملات الحطب من اليمن.jpg
- File:صور تراثيه.jpg
- File:حاملة الشريم.JPG
- File:صور من اليمن.jpg
- File:تعز اليمن ملابس تراثيه.jpg
- File:بنت من لواء المحويت تغرف الماء الصوره تم التقاطها من قبل الاستاذ الخياطي.jpg
- File:حاملة الشريم اغنيه ل ايوب طارش.JPG
- File:الهدهد صوره متحركه.gif (bird is well seen, but there is 129 photos in Category:Upupa epops, and still small unused photo with no metadata)
- File:حالة الشريم.gif
- File:تراث يمني.gif
- File:مناظر من اليمن صوره متحركه.gif
Third group, all other photos. Description is in Arabian. Probably is better, when somebody, who understands Arabian, will look these photos also. They are unused small photos with no metadata. Some photos are heavily photoshopped. Some photos seem copies of each other with different resolution. But some photos may have a bit ethnographical value. Nevertheless, I consider them all out of scope, some may be copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: I saw no descriptions in any language -- not useful, no matter what they are. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:14, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Ardinceva N-li
[edit]User Ardinceva N-li uploaded these files:
- File:Жилой дом с администр. помещениями..JPG
- File:Многоквартирный дом..JPG
- File:МТТ г.Армавир.JPG
- File:Техникум..JPG
They are all quite modern buildings, but there is no freedom of panorama in Russia (Armavir and Krasnodar). Taivo (talk) 10:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- File:МТТ г.Армавир.JPG, File:Техникум..JPG - the building is constructed in 1913 [6] (here it is the building on third illustrations), see Template:PD-RusEmpire. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept, One building is indeed from 1913 and thus free. Another building is from 1933-38. I could not find any info on the architect. Whereas it is very well possible that the architect lived longer than 1942 and the building is thus non-free, I would prefer to keep it until we have more definite information.Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Student.m91
[edit]Here are all files, uploaded by user Student.m91 and not yet presented for deletion:
- File:Torre Diamante Diamantone.jpg
- File:Vista Porta Nuova - Ottobre 2013.jpg
- File:Torre Diamante Diamantone Milano.jpg
- File:Torre Solaria Milano 2013.jpg
- File:Torre Solaria Torre Unicredit 2013.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Italy, but they seem all modern buildings. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
copy of Image:M09 mtvs4187 45.gif with lower quality (due to jpg format) Stas000D (talk) 13:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
I can't see permission for the new "bigger rez" upload. License at http://www.flickr.com/photos/jessykalaynne/7490186336/ is "all rights reserved". I asked the new uploader but didn't responded. Moreover the original uploader has only one upload, so her right is also questionable. JKadavoor Jee 12:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: New uploader responding here; humble apologies for my tardiness. The copyright notice on the Flickr page (© All Rights Reserved) means that Commons should not host this image as free, in any resolution. However the lowres image was apparently uploaded (donated as CC-by-sa) to Commons 3 months before its bigger rez version was uploaded as copyrighted in Flickr. So the matter seems to be only about whether licensing can be restricted in terms of resolution — a question which has an established answer in Commons policy, right? -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Google search gives me links to http://jessykalaynne.blogspot.in/ and https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/XMHDa2UB6akHuJnl1XNiTtJVokmCye6_u9dAwn0oRsE also but they also have a newer time-stamp. Anyway little chance for this photo taken by the subject herself and hosted here. Sorry Tuvalkin if my original DR has any offensive tone. JKadavoor Jee 12:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- (Tone is cool.) Both the date difference and the personal tone of the original description of our image (surprisingly articulate, even if naive) makes me think that it is very likely that, unusually, the upload to Commons was made by the subject of someone close on her behalf. -- Tuválkin ✉ 13:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Two issues:
- We can't keep the new version, anyway.
- Confusing username. I don't know we have a relevant policy here.
- What about removing the promotional description, keeping only the name of person? JKadavoor Jee 15:45, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply:
- Concerning the higher resolution version — I have been trying to find the relevant policy, no success. I seem to remember a case such as this where it was defended that a license covers any resolution of any given image, and that licensing only a lowres version is not an option (unless the photographer keeps the hires original offline all the times, of course).
- Why is it confusing? If the user is indeed the subject, this is the expected username. As a model, she’s a wanabe public figure.
- I agree. It should be kept in the file history, though, as it uniquely makes the case for a geniune upload 3 months earlier than the blogpost.
- -- Tuválkin ✉ 15:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- 1. The license is applicable to the work "as is". We have many users who sells higher resolution versions and donate limited resolution versions here.
- 2.You said above that you assume the uploader may be a close relative of the subject. In such cases, he/she can't use the name of the subject, if the subject is a known person as in this case. WP has such a policy; didn't see such a one here.
- 3. Thanks. JKadavoor Jee 16:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply:
- (Tone is cool.) Both the date difference and the personal tone of the original description of our image (surprisingly articulate, even if naive) makes me think that it is very likely that, unusually, the upload to Commons was made by the subject of someone close on her behalf. -- Tuválkin ✉ 13:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Google search gives me links to http://jessykalaynne.blogspot.in/ and https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/XMHDa2UB6akHuJnl1XNiTtJVokmCye6_u9dAwn0oRsE also but they also have a newer time-stamp. Anyway little chance for this photo taken by the subject herself and hosted here. Sorry Tuvalkin if my original DR has any offensive tone. JKadavoor Jee 12:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Kept: The image is apparently freely licensed here. The only issue is resolution. Although I could understand an argument that a much higher resolution version is a different image for copyright purposes, I think that is not the case. Therefore, I think that once a photographer has licensed any version of an image, all resolutions have the same license. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
