Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/10/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_mohd_zain_saqib_born_in_november_22_1994_and_now_zain_is_live_in_new_delhi_2013-10-14_08-24.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
no images exist on the commons of her (or related to her), so we cant have a gallery Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Walking-dead-michael-rooker-merle-dixon-zombie-tyler-chase-ben-this-sorrowful-life-amc.jpg
[edit]
copyright violation, see http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2013/03/walking-dead-season-3-episode-15-recap-this-sorrowful-life.html Berthold Werner (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Blatant copyvio High Contrast (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
DW of non-free book covers. Anatoliy (talk) 18:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC) I agree. Speedy it, please. --BaseSat (talk) 18:40, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: DW Anatoliy (talk) 18:41, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
I must hide my true identity. This ID card is my privacy. Relly Komaruzaman Talk 12:54, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request russavia (talk) 17:29, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
False authorship claims - has been pblished previously on the web (2009): [1] High Contrast (talk) 16:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per reaction at File talk:Relly Komaruzaman.png. --Martin H. (talk) 19:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
terrible bad qualitiy image Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Delete, not the best quality here. -- Cirt (talk) 15:47, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Dschwen (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Low quality image and possible copyright violation, uploaded by a new puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio via grabbed from internet. Gunnex (talk) 20:43, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Dschwen (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Low quality image and possible copyright violation, uploaded by a new puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:50, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Dschwen (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
No source, date or author. Wrong license, possible copyright violation uploaded by a new puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:51, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Dschwen (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Low quality image and possible copyright violation, uploaded by a new puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:51, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Dschwen (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Duplicated (Archivo:SBASE.png) and uploaded by a new puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Dschwen (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Low quality image and possible copyright violation, uploaded by a new puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Dschwen (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Low quality image and possible copyright violation, uploaded by a new puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:54, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Dschwen (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Low quality image and possible copyright violation, uploaded by a new puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:54, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Dschwen (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
No source, no aurhor given, wrong license and file uploaded by a new puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Dschwen (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
No source, no aurhor given, wrong license and file uploaded by a new puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Dschwen (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
No source, no aurhor given, wrong license and file uploaded by a new puppet of User:Milanopablojavier24 Banfield - Amenazas aquí 01:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Dschwen (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:08, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 12:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Do you want to be the fun, outgoing, popular, pretty girl at your school?-Well continue reading--------LOOKS-if you want to be popular and pretty you always have to look your best--That means brushing your hai 2013-10-15 09-33.jpg
[edit]
unused personal photo, bad name, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:23, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Some homepage material, includes plenty og logos, out of scope Motopark (talk) 04:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
I see no indication on the refered to page that this photograph has been put into the public domain. Instead I find the notice at the bottom "Copyright © Makedonium. All rigths reserved". AFBorchert (talk) 05:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope IMO - looks like a tribute to their dog Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Advertisement Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Advertising Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 14:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Too blurry and too small Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
The back of someones head - don't see the educational value Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Per [2], the map is licensed as "non-commercial only" and "no derivatives without prior permission". Eleassar (t/p) 09:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination, per [3]. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
![[3]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Undelete/File:East-Hem_475ad.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: withdrawn Dschwen (talk) 22:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Too small, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:52, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:56, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:08, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, unknown location, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Mohd Zain Saqib he know us (zain ahm) mohd zain saqib born in november 22 1994 and now zain is live in new delhi 2013-10-14 08-24.jpg
[edit]_mohd_zain_saqib_born_in_november_22_1994_and_now_zain_is_live_in_new_delhi_2013-10-14_08-24.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_mohd_zain_saqib_born_in_november_22_1994_and_now_zain_is_live_in_new_delhi_2013-10-14_08-24.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Doubt its own work with that watermark Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Reproduction of copyrighted cover (hence a derivative work), no sign of publisher permission. Jean-Fred (talk) 12:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:06, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used Gbawden (talk) 12:50, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:06, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Advertising Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:07, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Advertising Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
I need this page will be deleted immediately. Relly Komaruzaman Talk 13:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, есть а Интернете http://orehovo.biz/fhoto-video/ Dogad75 (talk) 13:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation Berthold Werner (talk) 13:06, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see http://twicsy.com/u/iamJAYELCortez Berthold Werner (talk) 13:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This uploader has a track record of uploading other people's images (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Francis jasper). -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Can't be own work with that watermark Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of Scope Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS Dschwen (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS Dschwen (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS Dschwen (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS Dschwen (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS Dschwen (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS Dschwen (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS Dschwen (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Inappropriate and out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Extremely blurry - in this substandard quality not useable for educational purposes High Contrast (talk) 13:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:12, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 14:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This uploader has a track record of uploading other people's images (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Francis jasper). -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:40, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: PRP Dschwen (talk) 23:01, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
out of scope. 188.176.236.246 15:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:12, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
The map had been simply taken from here, a web that states clearly that all its content its copyrighted (Copyright © 2005 - 2013 - Tous les droits réservés.). Also, the file is a copy of [4], wich is the same copyrighted file, with the only differences that the uploader had erased the header that shows the map's webpage url and had highlighted the Moroccan city of Oujda. HCPUNXKID (talk) 15:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carte-du-maroc.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:14, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Low quality self-potrait. Not used. Not notable person? Kulmalukko (talk) 16:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. Yann (talk) 15:14, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
we already had yesterday one example of low quality pictures of this penis. We have a lot better images - please show these images st other sites in the net, if you need this. Marcus Cyron (talk) 17:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. There are plenty of much better photos of same topic. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, essentially per Ellin Beltz (talk · contribs), above. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Dschwen (talk) 23:01, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:222926 1760768134272 1091104372 31669407 2599555 n.jpg
- File:225339 1760785414704 1091104372 31669434 2919215 n.jpg
- File:225655 1760747013744 1091104372 31669313 403207 n.jpg
- File:227592 1760783374653 1091104372 31669429 2377008 n.jpg
- File:227619 1760784654685 1091104372 31669432 3410962 n.jpg
- File:228120 1760793054895 1091104372 31669457 5657785 n.jpg
- File:228431 1760764334177 1091104372 31669392 7042357 n.jpg
- File:228462 1760758334027 1091104372 31669364 6976524 n.jpg
Unlikely to be own work, missing EXIF. Alex (talk) 22:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:19, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Flickr says: "Taken on October 2, 2013". No EXIF available and upload date unavailable. When EXIF is unavailable, Flickr seems to think that date of photography = date of upload. Also on this page from 31 May 2013 which is earlier. Smells like Flickrwashing. Stefan4 (talk) 22:17, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per Flickrwash --Leoboudv (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete All of this Flickr users images appear to have been stolen mostly from various porn sites. All different sizes and resolutions and watermarks that have nothing to do with the user. Ww2censor (talk) 22:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: flickrwashing Dschwen (talk) 23:03, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyright holder asserts this is not under PD (see ticket:2013101710005947). Image should be in Wikipedia under Fair Use, like all logos. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Keep I guess the "copyrightholder" does not understand the threshold of originality then. Or maybe I'm interpreting it too liberally. --Dschwen (talk) 23:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Below the TOO . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO UK --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:47, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Sufficient effort (from a UK perspective) is likely to have been expended and the logo is potentially sufficiently original (due to the modified letters) to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin (the UK). See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:AVEVA logo.jpg. mattbr 17:48, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. If the EDGE magazine logo (see COM:TOO UK) is protected, this one is too. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Previously published via http://web.archive.org/web/20021204143335/http://www.cibm-valencia.com/anteriores/2000/VALENCIA/Compositores/CompoEsp.htm (archive from 2002) = http://www.cibm-valencia.com/anteriores/2000/Fotos/Compositores/amando%20blanquer.jpg and/or (as configured) permission from "Ajuntament de Aldaia" (= local government of Spanish municipality en:Aldaia) needed. Gunnex (talk) 19:30, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Marchal Mithouard, aka Shaka, is born in 1975. Copyright violation. 82.124.240.62 19:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Invalid {{PD-old-100}} claim as the photo is from around 1965 which is less than 100 years ago. Stefan4 (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
duplicate, invalid watermark copyrigth Threecharlie (talk) 20:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:22, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Low quality duplicate of File:Campbell 2013 2.jpg Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:31, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
The map had been simply taken from here, a web that states clearly that all its content its copyrighted (Copyright © 2005 - 2013 - Tous les droits réservés.) HCPUNXKID (talk) 16:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
The map clearly states on the bottom that it is a 2004 copyrighted work of the French "Division Geographique de la Direction des Archives du Ministere des Affaires Etrangeres", wich had even been modificated by the uploader to erase the internationally recognized border between Morocco and Western Sahara. See here to view the original file. HCPUNXKID (talk) 15:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Image has to be of US origin to fall under this legal excemption, this can't be confirmed. Text on this image is hardly identifyable also the back side with possible additional info is not shown Denniss (talk) 12:45, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: UK actor and film -- likely PD-no-notice does not apply. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
dubious "own work" Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:40, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:30, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:48, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
We have this image in SVG format. Fry1989 eh? 17:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
I uploaded the wrong file FCBComms (talk) 14:56, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
droits pas conformes, erreur lors de l'importation Mdiebold (talk) 09:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
replaced by more precise [File:Flandre inf 1740.png]][: L' empereur Charles (talk) 08:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted in USA, see {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. Stefan4 (talk) 08:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no FOP in Belgium - needs to wait until 2014 Henxter (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
blurry tourist shot, we have a lot of better images Category:Festung Hohensalzburg, low quality Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logomarca complexa de uso não livre. Usuário não comprova autoria da mesma. Tonelada (talk) 12:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Similar image (the object is fully visible) here. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:46, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Bogus {{PD-URAA}} license. Author died 1968. Why this music is in PD? JuTa 18:54, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
One of the source images has been deleted as a copyvio, if someone is interested in replacing it with a free image then this can be kept, else it can be replaced on the one project page it's in use by one of the other montages in the category. —SpacemanSpiff 09:45, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Do we need these kinda montages? I got few deleted yesterday as they had copyvio images in between. Can't Wikipedias simply arrange images in a way to give similar feel? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:49, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: THe answer to Dharmadhyaksha's question is "yes, absolutely". While it is not trivial, it is not very hard . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
dubious "own work" Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
We don't know who is the author (the photografer), and if he wants to give his work with free licence ; at least need an OTRS from the author --MGuf (d) 16:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Not "own work" as claimed. An image "for Wikipedia" is not freely licensed as we require. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
dubious "own work" Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
British logo. More complex than w:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg which is copyrighted in the UK. Stefan4 (talk) 09:45, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Probably not permanently installed. See COM:FOP#Pakistan. Stefan4 (talk) 10:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license, the uploader added {{PD-old}} afterwards, which is very doubtfull for a 1941 drawing. The unknown artist must have died within 2 years after creation of this. JuTa 18:40, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
self-promotional Puzzlet Chung (talk) 21:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
This image shows an event which took place less than 100 years ago, so the author can impossibly have been dead for 100 years as claimed in the copyright template. Stefan4 (talk) 16:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: In fact it can not be older than around 60 years (Anne was born 1950), so the photographer cannot have been dead 70 years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:30, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:48, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
replaced by more precise File:La Sarre inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 08:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
I don't think this is really some personnal work + photomontage on left El Funcionario (talk) 13:41, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Logomarca complexa de autoria não confirmada Tonelada (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 09:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
replaced by more precise File:Luxembourg inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 14:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
dubious "own work" Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
dubious "own work" Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 11:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: / . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpageimage}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpageimage}} Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
the minecraft-character is copyrighted, most likely not own work 188.176.236.246 15:06, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:01, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
The uploader claim that the file is taken from the CIA World Factbook, although does not provide any proof of that claim. It seems that the uploader had merged the original separated maps of Morocco and Western Sahara (as they are on the CIA World Factbook) to create a new one. HCPUNXKID (talk) 15:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Since the CIA factbook is PD, there is nothiinjg wrong with creating this map. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
The uploader claim that the file is taken from the CIA World Factbook, although does not provide any proof of that claim. It seems that the uploader had merged the original separated maps of Morocco and Western Sahara (as they are on the CIA World Factbook) to create a new one. HCPUNXKID (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Since the CIA factbook is PD, there is nothiinjg wrong with creating this map. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Namibia: non-free relief. Eleassar (t/p) 08:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Comment It says 1484 on the stone, but the stone seems to be in a lot better condition than something made in 1484 would be in. --Stefan4 (talk) 09:48, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Namibia: the translations were presumably written in 1986, like [5]. Eleassar (t/p) 08:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NA-cape-cross-stein-engl.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Namibia: non-free artwork from 1986. Eleassar (t/p) 08:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
This is a US work, {{PD-URAA}} cannot be valid here. LOC source says: Rights status not evaluated. Might this be a {{PD-US-no notice}}? JuTa 19:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Replaced with better picture FrankieF (talk) 17:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: We generally keep more thqn one picture of a notable person. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 11:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
unused personal image McZusatz (talk) 13:00, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Produced by Lake House Copyright © 2012 The Associated Newspapers of Ceylon Ltd. Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
replaced by more precise File:Roy Vaisseaux inf 1734.png L' empereur Charles (talk) 08:56, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 08:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: No reason given, the image is in use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Official school logo, no evidence of free license GrapedApe (talk) 03:25, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:35, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Marchal Mithouard, aka Shaka, is born in 1975. Copyright violation. 82.124.240.62 19:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, low resolution, no links, useless, without any sense ProfessorX (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rubin16 as no license, but there is a license, which IMHO is not correct. JuTa 18:31, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted drawing . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Rubin16 as no license, but there is a license, which is IMHO not correct. JuTa 18:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost identical image is here. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
A copy of File:Tigranes 2.jpg. -- Akim Dubrow (talk) 23:35, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:33, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a self-potrait. Overexposed, maybe not usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:25, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Described as an "Art photo", We do not keep personal art of non notable artists. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cannabis shops in Denver
[edit]COM:FOP#United States doesn't apply to signs or advertisements.
- File:Local Product of Colorado 2.jpg
- File:Poster for The Medijuana Center - 1.jpg
- File:Poster for The Medijuana Center - 2.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 10:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please cite the specific text in COM:FOP#United States that excludes signs and advertisements. I cannot find it. O'Dea (talk) 10:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- COM:FOP#United States, i.e. s:United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 1/Section 120, only mentions buildings. Signs and advertisements aren't buildings. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- That is correct. It does not mention signs and advertisements in a public street. Nowhere does it specify that photography of them is forbidden, which makes sense, as photography would then be impossible in capitalist urban, and many rural, public spaces, which is most of the settled world. As an aside, may I ask you please to be more careful if you wish to cite something? I spent five minutes reading COM:FOP#United States and did not find the words "sign" or "advertisement". Then I copied the text into an editor and executed a text search in case I had missed the words. I asked you to cite specific text in COM:FOP#United States to help me, and instead you cited a different document altogether which also does not contain "sign" or "advertisement". This sort of thing is annoying because it is frustrating to waste time on futile tasks, and to discover that the thing you were searching for wasn't there. Thank you. O'Dea (talk) 10:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- See 17 USC § 106. You can't take photos of something, unless anything in sections 107-122 says otherwise. As that isn't the case, photography isn't permitted. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- That is correct. It does not mention signs and advertisements in a public street. Nowhere does it specify that photography of them is forbidden, which makes sense, as photography would then be impossible in capitalist urban, and many rural, public spaces, which is most of the settled world. As an aside, may I ask you please to be more careful if you wish to cite something? I spent five minutes reading COM:FOP#United States and did not find the words "sign" or "advertisement". Then I copied the text into an editor and executed a text search in case I had missed the words. I asked you to cite specific text in COM:FOP#United States to help me, and instead you cited a different document altogether which also does not contain "sign" or "advertisement". This sort of thing is annoying because it is frustrating to waste time on futile tasks, and to discover that the thing you were searching for wasn't there. Thank you. O'Dea (talk) 10:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- COM:FOP#United States, i.e. s:United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 1/Section 120, only mentions buildings. Signs and advertisements aren't buildings. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Stefan, please, I am growing increasingly frustrated with you. I went to the latest link you cited and read the first few paragraphs above the table of contents (TOC). I found nothing there corresponding to your vague directions. I scanned the rest and saw how long the document is. I copied and pasted the text below the TOC into Word and it counted 3,815 words, and is 10 pages long. Do you seriously expect me to trawl through all that after I requested you to CITE something? Please, again, CITE TEXT. Please do not just point at a document vaguely, with an "it's in there" attitude. I come to this project to contribute, not to get bogged down like this. QUOTE SOMETHING, and I will happily look at it. The document does not mention signs or street advertisements at all and I cannot easily find a place where it says, "You can take pictures of this, that, and the other – and nothing else." Do you see the problem? CITE SPECIFIC TEXT that I can look at. So far, we have batted this back and forth without yet reaching a discussion of the substantive issue because you have not guided me to what you think sweepingly forbids photography in heavily-texted public spaces. GAAAH! O'Dea (talk) 18:43, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Subject to sections 107 through
122, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following:
- (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords;
- (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;
- (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending;
- (4) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform the copyrighted work publicly;
- (5) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and
- (6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.
In short: unless you can find an exception in sections 107-122, you can't reproduce the signs, prepare derivative works (including taking a photo of them), distribute copies of the signs or include the signs in a motion picture or other audiovisual work, unless you obtain permission from the copyright holder. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:39, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for finally citing text (phew!). Now, I can see two things: 1. Signs and advertising are not mentioned at all. 2. There is no statement that anything not mentioned is forbidden. So, what is your problem? O'Dea (talk) 11:55, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- The exclusive rights above apply to all works, including signs and advertising. As stated in the quote above, doing anything of the above is prohibited unless you are the "owner of copyright", have permission from the "owner of copyright" or find an applicable exception in sections 107-122. As there is no applicable exception in sections 107-122, only the "owner of copyright" or someone who has permission from him is able to take and upload photos of signs. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- The passage you cited above lists the rights of a copyright owner. There is no mention of prohibition. O'Dea (talk) 16:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- The passage I cited above lists the exclusive rights of a copyright owner. If someone else does any of the above, then it is a violation of the copyright owner's exclusive rights and thus prohibited. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:33, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- There is no mention of signs and advertisements. They are not specified at all. O'Dea (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Signs and advertisements are mentioned in the section header: "§ 106—Exclusive rights in copyrighted works". --Stefan4 (talk) 18:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please stop this silly time-wasting. They are not mentioned. I have searched by eye and by text search. O'Dea (talk) 18:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- The header is unambiguous: the section applies to all copyrighted works, not just some of them. --Stefan4 (talk) 10:01, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please stop this silly time-wasting. They are not mentioned. I have searched by eye and by text search. O'Dea (talk) 18:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Signs and advertisements are mentioned in the section header: "§ 106—Exclusive rights in copyrighted works". --Stefan4 (talk) 18:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- There is no mention of signs and advertisements. They are not specified at all. O'Dea (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- The passage I cited above lists the exclusive rights of a copyright owner. If someone else does any of the above, then it is a violation of the copyright owner's exclusive rights and thus prohibited. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:33, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- The passage you cited above lists the rights of a copyright owner. There is no mention of prohibition. O'Dea (talk) 16:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear infringement of copyright. Signs and ads are graphic works which are explicitly mentioned in the copyright law.. Virtually all of the descriptive terms in the copyright law should be construed very broadly -- for example, computer software is copyrighted as a literary work. Please remember that FOP is an exception to the general rule that all creative works have a copyright and may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. O'dea may find USCO Circular #1, Copyright Basics, helpful. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Sacagawea Dollar Coin Mint
[edit]- File:Ms. L. Corlione Cruz The Real Face Model on the 2000 Gold 1$ Coin.JPG
- File:Ms. L. Corlione Cruz The Real Face Model on the 2000 Gold 1$ Coin.png
- File:Sacagawea_Dollar...Ms._L._Corlione_Cruz_The_Real_Face_Model_on_the_2000_Gold_1$_Coin.JPG
- File:Ms. L. Corlione Cruz The Real Face Model on the 2000 Gold 1$ Coin.JPG
Reasons for deletion request -- Multiple personal snapshots of non-notable individual, outside of project scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
See also
- File:Golden Coin Mint USA.JPG and
- File:Sacagawea=_Ms._L._Corlione_Cruz_=_Real_Face_Model_1$_Coin_USA.....JPG marked for deletion and discussed on Commons:Deletion_requests/2013/10/12
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:13, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Looks like collection of promo photos, not own work.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- I've worked as a photographer for many years and both these pictures are my own. Why suggest otherwise? A quick image search would lead you to this page, on my domain atle.no, where you can see on the bottom that all content is under Creative Commons. The upload wizard does not suggest that separate documentation is needed for own work. --Atle r s (talk) 12:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: These appear on the cited page, which has an NC license, which is not acceptable to Commons. Since we have no direct way of knowing that User:Atle is actually the photographer Atle, we require a license using the procedure at Commons:OTRS.. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. File:JordiRios(1).tif most likely screenshoted from unknown video/TV source.
Gunnex (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Screenshots by User:Loveableone
[edit]
Reasons for deletion request --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC) Mostly low quality images. Likely screen captures or rephotographs. No Meta or EXIF data, subjects are all performers. See also deletion requests on File:Lucianaandrade.png and File:Karinhils.png on Commons:Deletion_requests/2013/10/12 Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Amateur porn Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC) Photo of a vagina in high resolution, image not found on Wikipedia commons, so useful to users. to date there are images of poor quality and of questionable taste.
Thank you
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Author = Subject = Uploader. It is unlikely that the subject is actually the photographer of this image. There is no evidence of permission from the actual photographer . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Clearly porn Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vituzzu as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: no educational purpose, logo for a non-notable page on it.wiki Dschwen (talk) 16:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded in 07.2006 by 1-upload user Cristog to illustrate "his" article at eswiki, referenced with the official site http://www.angelalcazar.com = 404, per wayback configured with a photo gallery (no images archived), eventually grabbed from there. In 2013 the foto is still credited with "Foto: ACADEMIA DE CINE" (Spanish Academy of Arts and Cinematographic Sciences) by Europa Press (a Spanish independent, privately held news agency) via http://www.europapress.es/cultura/noticia-fallece-57-anos-angel-alcaraz-actor-reparto-treintena-peliculas-espanolas-20130417190531.html Gunnex (talk) 19:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
zweifelhafter Upload, User hat bereits auf WP einen Fakeartikel damit angelegt. Das Bild zeigt Prof. Erlhoff http://www.ifg-ulm.de/66.html Hubertl (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Derselbe User hat bereits ein Fake-Bild eingestellt und sich als Urheber ausgegeben. Es ist zu bezweifeln, dass dieses von ihm selbst sein sollte. Hubertl (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Derselbe User hat bereits ein Fake-Bild eingestellt und sich als Urheber ausgegeben. Es ist zu bezweifeln, dass dieses von ihm selbst sein sollte. Hubertl (talk) 22:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
similar image by the same user exists which is less blurry Diana Ringo (talk) 23:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
similar image by the same user exists which is less blurry Diana Ringo (talk) 23:50, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
similar image by the same user exists which is less blurry (Jesuitenkirche Wien 20091006 002.JPG) Diana Ringo (talk) 23:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 01:06, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
quite blurry, we have a better image of the same subject: File:Althofen,_Salzburger_Platz_6_-_detail3.JPG Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Gute Idee. Bitte löschen. Ich bin echt froh, dass mir jemand hinterhersteigt. So wird die Sammlung wenigstens qualitativ. --Hubertl (talk) 22:34, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Uploader agreed. Ymblanter (talk) 00:41, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Request is made by User:Atefrat, the creator of this file.
This file does not link to any Wikipedia page.
Its upload history is of no importance to anyone but said creator.
An almost exact duplicate, File:ILjunction-nahalrevida-prelim-HE.PNG, has replaced this file. @Efrat (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Then apply {{Duplicate}} on one file; an admin will verify and delete one. JKadavoor Jee 07:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand. I want this file to be deleted.
- I want to keep File:ILjunction-nahalrevida-prelim-HE.PNG. ( The word "prelim" in the file name is not because the file is "preliminary". It is because the junction has not yet been built.)
- I don't understand why it is so difficult to delete this file when it is obviously a matter of simple maintenance by the creator of the work. Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 08:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Yeah, sorry, this seems close enough and uncontroversial enough to be speedied. Dschwen (talk) 13:31, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
A totally unnecessary redirect. I asked that the file, "File:ILjunction-nahalrevida2.png" be deleted.
The deletion was approved
Nobody would ever type in this name to search for the target file.
See: Commons:Deletion requests/File:ILjunction-nahalrevida2.png @Efrat (talk) 17:08, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- But it may be linked from the outside (through instant commons). --Dschwen (talk) 17:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please clarify. I gotta say that I've requested about 8 or 9 deletions for identical reasons and have never had so much feedback. I'm just interested in cleaning up obvious junk from the wiki servers. What use is this redirect? What outside? What is instant commons? Why is this so important? Please educate me. Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 17:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- While cleaning up junk is nice, not breaking links on the web is even nicer. There is not really any drawback to keeping the redirect. The file is about 8months old. This is plenty of time to make it not completely unlikely that the image is picked up on other websites (linking to the copy on commons). Instant commons is a Mediawiki functionality that allows any Mediawiki installation to seamlessly use commons images. Bottom line: we should not be overzealous in deleting redirects. --Dschwen (talk) 17:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- OK! I guess the next time I make a mistake and wish to delete a file, I should do so immediately. Thanks for your help. Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 07:42, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- While cleaning up junk is nice, not breaking links on the web is even nicer. There is not really any drawback to keeping the redirect. The file is about 8months old. This is plenty of time to make it not completely unlikely that the image is picked up on other websites (linking to the copy on commons). Instant commons is a Mediawiki functionality that allows any Mediawiki installation to seamlessly use commons images. Bottom line: we should not be overzealous in deleting redirects. --Dschwen (talk) 17:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please clarify. I gotta say that I've requested about 8 or 9 deletions for identical reasons and have never had so much feedback. I'm just interested in cleaning up obvious junk from the wiki servers. What use is this redirect? What outside? What is instant commons? Why is this so important? Please educate me. Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 17:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: File was present for about 10 month under the old name, redirects are only deleted for recent uploads. --Denniss (talk) 19:57, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Request is made by User:Atefrat, the creator of this file.
This file does not link to any Wikipedia page.
Its upload history is of no importance to anyone but said creator.
An almost exact duplicate, File:ILjunction-nahalrevida-prelim-HE.PNG, has replaced this file. @Efrat (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Then apply {{Duplicate}} on one file; an admin will verify and delete one. JKadavoor Jee 07:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand. I want this file to be deleted.
- I want to keep File:ILjunction-nahalrevida-prelim-HE.PNG. ( The word "prelim" in the file name is not because the file is "preliminary". It is because the junction has not yet been built.)
- I don't understand why it is so difficult to delete this file when it is obviously a matter of simple maintenance by the creator of the work. Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 08:27, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Yeah, sorry, this seems close enough and uncontroversial enough to be speedied. Dschwen (talk) 13:31, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
A totally unnecessary redirect. I asked that the file, "File:ILjunction-nahalrevida2.png" be deleted.
The deletion was approved
Nobody would ever type in this name to search for the target file.
See: Commons:Deletion requests/File:ILjunction-nahalrevida2.png @Efrat (talk) 17:08, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- But it may be linked from the outside (through instant commons). --Dschwen (talk) 17:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please clarify. I gotta say that I've requested about 8 or 9 deletions for identical reasons and have never had so much feedback. I'm just interested in cleaning up obvious junk from the wiki servers. What use is this redirect? What outside? What is instant commons? Why is this so important? Please educate me. Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 17:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- While cleaning up junk is nice, not breaking links on the web is even nicer. There is not really any drawback to keeping the redirect. The file is about 8months old. This is plenty of time to make it not completely unlikely that the image is picked up on other websites (linking to the copy on commons). Instant commons is a Mediawiki functionality that allows any Mediawiki installation to seamlessly use commons images. Bottom line: we should not be overzealous in deleting redirects. --Dschwen (talk) 17:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- OK! I guess the next time I make a mistake and wish to delete a file, I should do so immediately. Thanks for your help. Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 07:42, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
- While cleaning up junk is nice, not breaking links on the web is even nicer. There is not really any drawback to keeping the redirect. The file is about 8months old. This is plenty of time to make it not completely unlikely that the image is picked up on other websites (linking to the copy on commons). Instant commons is a Mediawiki functionality that allows any Mediawiki installation to seamlessly use commons images. Bottom line: we should not be overzealous in deleting redirects. --Dschwen (talk) 17:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Please clarify. I gotta say that I've requested about 8 or 9 deletions for identical reasons and have never had so much feedback. I'm just interested in cleaning up obvious junk from the wiki servers. What use is this redirect? What outside? What is instant commons? Why is this so important? Please educate me. Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 17:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: File was present for about 10 month under the old name, redirects are only deleted for recent uploads. --Denniss (talk) 19:57, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Fichier abusivement restauré après suppression : l'auteur a clairement précisé qu'il ne voulait pas que ses fichiers soient restaurés en cas de suppression : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Katepanomegas 80.215.0.239 00:28, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Only certain elements are considered a violation, they can be removed and replaced. Fry1989 eh? 17:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep No elements are a violation, licenses are granted irrevocably. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 12:40, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Katepanomegas author has indeed asked to keep his deleted files deleted due to repeted molestations against him/her. Kathisma (talk) 16:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Just to respect uploader's willing. - Fma12 (talk) 19:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to delete, just another IP attack on the uploader Denniss (talk) 21:36, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:MicaelaYoung
[edit]- File:Gus_first_river_visit_3.jpg
- File:Gus_first_river_visit_2.jpg
- File:Me_on_Missouri.jpg
- File:Gus_on_the_Missouri_River_today.jpg
- File:Gus first river visit 1.jpg
- File:Gus on the Missouri.jpg
Reasons for deletion request -- Personal family photographs outside the scope of the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: one kept Denniss (talk) 12:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Files of Журманов Сергей
[edit]- File:Ленину.jpg
- File:Сказ об Урале.jpg
- File:Сарай Бату.JPG
- File:МОУ Луговая СОШ..jpg
- File:Орел добравольцам.jpg
- File:Скорбящие Матери.jpg
- File:Журманов Сергей.jpg
- File:Zhurmanov dmitriu.jpg
- File:Ioasaf-zhurmanov2.jpg
- File:Chelboat.lekbot.JPG
- File:Chelboat.jpg
- File:Катамаран Классик.jpg
- File:БотКрафт.jpg
- File:Журманов Иоасаф.jpg
- File:Pоза43.jpg
Just deleted an obvious copyvio. Has about 5 deleted files. lots of small images without exif. Lots of different exif in remaing files:
- Olympus SP560UZ
- Handmade Software, Inc. Image Alchemy v1.7.7
- SONY DSC-T7
- NIKON E4200
- SONY DSC-W80
--Amada44 talk to me 19:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:36, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Francis jasper
[edit]Highly unlikely to be "own work": many different sizes, no EXIF, and many different watermarks on the pics (especially evident on image:Metropolitan cathedral of the city of san fernando pampanɡa philippines ø00.jpg.
- File:Metropolitan cathedral of the city of san fernando pampanɡa philippines ø00.jpg
- File:Happy fernando.jpg
- File:Csfp f;aɡ.jpg
- File:Seal of csfp.jpg
- File:City of san fernando pampanɡa.jpg
- File:Pampanɡa capitol.jpg
- File:Pyestanɡ tuɡak.jpg
- File:Monumento frnandon.jpg
- File:ɡiant lantern festival.jpg
- File:University of the assumption.jpg
- File:Sanfernando.jpg
- File:Pampanɡa hiɡh school.jpg
- File:Phs.jpg
- File:Βrɡy san nicolas lantern.jpg
- File:San fernando places.jpg
- File:Maɡalanɡ.jpg
- File:Arc mabalacat.jpg
- File:Taste of pampanɡa.jpg
- File:Smsfd.jpg
- File:San pedro welcome arc.jpg
P199 (talk) 16:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Files uploaded by Francis jasper
Highly unlikely to be own work. This uploader has already a track record of uploading other people's images (see above). A block should be considered!
- File:Βell tower.jpg
- File:Θhe ʃan fernando çathedral.jpg
- File:Main parish.jpg
- File:Cathedral of csfp.jpg
- File:City hall of san fernando.jpg
- File:Csfphall.jpg
- File:Pampanɡa.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Gone --Denniss (talk) 21:39, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Usually, this uploader configured his uploads with author = "Alejandro Rodríguez Villalobos" or (shortened) "Alejandro Rodríguez" (apparently the user´s real name and mostly all of the images with exif = "Sony Cybershot" are tagged in that way) but there a row of images configured with different authors (or no author) which need permission or further clarification. So, unlikely own work are the following files:
- File:Sueco noruego.jpg + File:Sueco noruego 1.jpg (author = "ANGEL BENEITO")
- File:Bandeja Alcoi.jpg + File:Barri LaSang Alcoi 2.jpg (no author)
- File:LlotjaSanJordi Alcoi.png (author = "Castro")
- File:Epsa viaducto escuelaindustrial.jpg (author = "LÓPEZ EGEA")
- File:Sueco noruego.jpg
- File:Sueco noruego 1.jpg
- File:Bandeja Alcoi.jpg
- File:Barri LaSang Alcoi 2.jpg
- File:LlotjaSanJordi Alcoi.png
- File:Epsa viaducto escuelaindustrial.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Tunesian company logos
[edit]
These files was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: advertisement, without encyclopedic value Dschwen (talk) 15:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Header-stepa-tunisie.png
- File:ISpace.png
- File:LogoTW.png
- File:Logo-ATS.png
- File:Logo We Love Bizerte.jpg
- Some may have other problems, but they're not particularly "advertisements" in any usual sense... AnonMoos (talk) 10:02, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, we have tons of logos on commons. Unless we come up with notability criteria we should focus on the copyright issues of the logos. --Dschwen (talk) 14:48, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Some may have other problems, but they're not particularly "advertisements" in any usual sense... AnonMoos (talk) 10:02, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 04:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)