This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Because you would have to be an attorney to understand the Lic. For keeping hate mongering snots like Bug you no Brennan from stealing my photos for her perverted lies and smear campaign. Sissybabytransvestite (talk) 00:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete Yes I agree, despite to be the own of this file and the guy who drawn it (I paint very bad, what do i do). If you want to delete right now, go ahead!. I don't have arguments for defend it. --Ravave (talk) 17:29, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deleted: Sockpuppeteer uploading copyvios. First uploaded files from unfree sources, later uploaded the same files with "own work" claims, now started sockpuppetry and continued uploading unfree files. Martin H. (talk) 17:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
It is your opinion, but not a fact. I own this picture because I'm part of it. You're just speculating and have no proof that I don't own it. Yes, it is widely on the web because it is listed publicly on facebook by other family members as well, that the media used it that's why it's on google. That's also why I have vast information regarding the topic. MrAchilles (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: Same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ram Revilla.jpg. The sources of the various pictures, the timespan and the fact that the user first uploaded files from unfree sources ("abs-cbnnews.com") and later uploaded the same files with "own work" claims makes it clear that the source information isnt correct. Martin H. (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Image of a non-notable baby, uploaded by his own older brother solely to support a deleted "I love my little brother" article on WP. Bearcat (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep, is an exact copy of the image that exists in the Wikipedia in English, is due maintain, as it is under the public domain; addition already has the kind of permission, which reads as follows: "This work contains material which may be subject to legal restrictions resulting by the use of registered trademarks in one or more jurisdictions. Before using this content, please ensure of that you have the permission to use it under the laws and circumstances that would apply in case of wanting use it. you is solely responsible of ensuring that you not infringe the rights of author of this trademark."--Who's That Boy?16:43, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Yes, but the file is licensed as "Trademarked", and also all languages of the article use this file. {{DeletionFooter|KEEP|[[User:DerComputerNoob|DerComputerNoob]] ([[User talk:DerComputerNoob|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 14:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)}}
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Delete, as it is a blatant copyright violation, unless they own the company or something along those lines, which I'm highly skeptical of anyway. WorldTraveller10112:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Main subject *is* the non-free copyrighted logo. While De minimis normally permits its inclusion within a free photo, the only rationale for this image is as a means to display the copyrighted logo itself. Ubcule (talk) 11:51, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Main subject *is* the non-free copyrighted logo. While De minimis normally permits its inclusion within a free photo, the only rationale for this image is as a means to display the copyrighted logo itself. Ubcule (talk) 11:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Photo of possibly copyrighted interiors (Café Pushkin in Moscow, founded in 1999, no original pre-1917 design). A.Savin14:23, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
it's from my personal files, one family member took this picture.
what i have to do to prove it as mine?
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Based on this article, this statue of Jacques Marquette was created in 1957, which means that it is in all probability still copyright protected. Because of this, photographic reproductions of the statue are not permitted to be released under free licenses (because of US law) and this photograph should be deleted. As the photographer and uploader, please accept my apologies for not catching this copyright violation earlier. Michael Barera (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
While Japanese gorvernment laws and regulations are free of copyright, works such as this are probably not. Therefore the image is a derivative work and we will need a license from the creator of the mascot in order to keep it here.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright violation. This image is a cropped version of the image created by Auguste Vanderkelen (1915-1991), with omission of the author's signature. The image was first published in the Belgian "Nos Gloires"- "'s Lands Glorie" series in the 1950s. See http://geschiedenisvanbelgie.blogspot.be/2013/01/historia-album-vi-deel-1.html for a full version. The copyright expires in 2061 (death of the author + 70 years) following Belgian law. Henxter (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Yes, it's listed as freely licensed on Flickr, but the Flickr user appears to simply modify pictures he or she has taken from elsewhere. I doubt that they are the copyright holder. J Milburn (talk) 18:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No free license. (False claim of CC-by-sa.) As is obvious from the correspondence, the photographer's permission to use the image in a Wikipedia article never granted a CC-by-sa license. Sending a copy of that correspondence to OTRS is useless. Asclepias (talk) 19:07, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
All these files are obvious screen captures, most of them taken from the various media coverage of the 21st July 2013, when king Philip was sworn in. --Asavaa (talk) 14:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
A 1952 book cover, the artist is not named. The uploader may have taken the photograph, but the cover image itself is very likely not his "own work" as claimed, and, being from ca. 1952, it is also most likely still copyrighted. So it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweigτ20:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pursuant to s5 of the 1911 Copyright Act, where a contract is signed prior to 1957, all rights revert to the estate of the author 25 years after their death. In this case, WSM, who wrote the book and designed the jacket, published the book in 1952 and died in 1965. All rights of copyright have reverted to his family, from 1990, who have uploaded the image. Therefore the entry may need amending to make this clear and I am happy for you to do this. Huguº (talk) 11:53, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You uploaded the image. Are you "his family"? I suggest you write an e-mail to Commons:OTRS, following the procedures set out there, identify yourself to the volunteers there, and explain how you hold the rights to this image. Thank you. --Rosenzweigτ13:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This image has accordingly been replaced with a fair use upload in English Wikipedia so you may now wish to delete this file. Huguº (talk) 21:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Ad Meskens as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: possible privacy infringement Converted to DR by me, as the file is on Commons since years and as the person in the image isn't really identifiable even in full resolution. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Need to provide proof of that claim of PD, copyright is 70 years after the death of the author so need to show that the author died before 1943. LGAtalkedits21:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Corporate authorship does not apply in UK law, it would have been created by someone and ownership and copyright would last for 70 years after that persons death. LGAtalkedits01:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This poster might well be created by the FBI, but it is a derivative work of 50 or so other photos and absent proof that all of them were licensed to the FBI then this must be removed from here. LGAtalkedits09:25, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Promotional content without any clear educational value. The company in question (website: aquademica.se) does not have a Wikipedia article on the Swedish/English versions.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as no source (no source since). They mostly marked as "own work". Is it impossile or very unlikely that they are realy created by the uploaders?
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Sorry but "if I recall correctly" and "overwhelming majority" does not cut it, there need to be proof that this logo was created by a federal government employee as opposed to one of the state of Indiana for it to have that licence. The burden of proof is on you to provided that proof and absent that as a Fair Use Claim can be made at a local wiki. LGAtalkedits20:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The National Guards are state organizations. They belong to the governors of those states. They can be federalized for periods of time by presidential order. Rather than looking at Title 10, you should look at Title 32, which is the applicable law here. A person who retires from the National Guard is not entitled to the same vet benefits as someone retired from the Reserves or active duty.Niteshift36 (talk) 13:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The United States Army National Guard seal (see right) is a work of the Federal Government and Public Domain. This file is based on it with the only difference being the substitution of "Army National Guard" with "Indiana National Guard" and adding two non-distinct aircraft. That's not enough, this is PD as a derivative.
Keep While in general the concern about the state national guard images is genuine, this particular image is just a variant of the Air National Guard emblem (see File:US Air National Guard Insignia.svg). There is no real additional authorship. [Also, quite often the PR offices of the state national guards are manned by full-time Army or Air Force regulars (i.e. federal employees) so even photos that come out of state offices might be OK. But this image is primarily a federally-authored image.] Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright is 70 years after the death of the author. Not all images from the 1890s are out of copyright, so something from the 1930s is a stretch. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Corporate authorship does not apply in UK law, it would have been created by someone and ownership and copyright would last for 70 years after that persons death. LGAtalkedits01:05, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Under the w:Copyright Duration Directive, article 1.4, the definition of "anonymous" is different if the initial copyright holder is a legal person. Under UK law, the copyright to a work for hire belongs to the employer (a legal person), not to the employee. Any 70 years p.m.a. term is nevertheless based on the year of death of the employee. This is further complicated by article 10.1 of the directive which says that you should use the copyright term of an earlier UK copyright law instead of the EU directive if the earlier UK copyright law defines a longer term than the EU directive. No idea what term that earlier UK copyright law specifies. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:02, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have two problems with keeping this -- first, we are told above that this is pre-WWII, but no evidence is given. Since there is very little information about Orantips on the Web, I think we need more evidence of age if we are going to keep it on those grounds. Second, there is no evidence that anyone has actually done any inquiry to determine the author. "Unknown author" in the UK requires that someone has done reasonable inquiry, not simply that we don't know. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence that this is old enough. Unless published before 1926, it is {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} and thus unfree in USA. For the UK copyright status, pre-1943 might be enough, provided that the image indeed is anonymous, for which we don't have sufficient evidence. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:02, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This user seems to think a Commons user page and talk page are a place for political pamphlets. They are not, of course, as this is not in the Commons project scope. So any versions of the user page that are a pamphlet should be deleted. Rosenzweigτ21:25, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The flag would be public domain. There is no evidence that this graphic is a creation of the US Government. It is from a private website. No evidence that they didn't generate the graphic themselves. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's not irrelevant. If I paint a picture of the White House and display it on my Facebook page, you can't claim it as public domain. If I go to the National Archives and take a picture of the Constitution, you can't claim my photo is public domain. Likewise, if a website renders a graphic of a flag, that doesn't make it up for grabs. It is their creation. Nor is this a derivative work. It is a flat out copy. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:47, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And why can't I find it on a reliable source? A google search for the Secret Service flag doesn't show this anywhere, but here. I'm not even convinced this rendering you lifted is accurate. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:03, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"It is a flat out copy". All the more reason to keep it, since it is identical to the actual subject in question, absent of any distinguishing features that denote it as being another discrete work. Also, here's a photograph of the actual flag. Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong. You can claim it's a derivative work, then claim it's an accurate copy. They are opposing points of view. Either it's a faithful reproduction or a derivative. It can't be both. Second, your "proof" isn't going to pass WP:RS. The lack of a reliable source is troubling. Lastly, this isn't a government product. It is a private party product. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I never claimed it was an exact copy; you were the one that made the claim to that effect. The linked photograph of an actual production of the flag was in response to your claim that you didn't think the flag was real. Also, I believe the NAVA counts as a reliable source, as far as vexillology is concerned. Regards, Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You said "since it is identical to the actual subject". What do you think identical means? Identical means exact copy. The linked photo is worthless. It's not a reliable source and while you're claiming it is an "actual production", you fail to establish who produced it. Anyone could make that flag. NAVA isn't looking reliable. They're a hobbyist organization with a low-rent looking website. How is it that this modern, functioning agency has a flag and no reliable sources know what it looks like? Further, NAVA produced that graphic, not the US Govt, so you can't claim it as PD. You claim it is in the public domain, yet can't show evidence of it in the public domain. But you did bring the fact that no reliable source is being used to establish the flag's legitimacy, so thanks for that? Niteshift36 (talk) 21:45, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question for Illegitimate Barrister : Firstly; was the file you uploaded created by a employee of the federal government of the US and if so was the underling flag created by a employee of the federal government ? If the answer to both is YES can you provide proof ? If the answer to either is NO then the file should not be hosted here. LGAtalkedits01:20, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Uploader offers DHS directive 0040 as evidence of the flag. However, the directive, which can be viewed here [2] describes a flag for the DHS, not the USSS. The DHS flag described is different than this one. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, the uploader has claimed it was created by the DHS, then changed it to Treasury. Has claimed the source was loeser.us, then badgecards.com. What we do know is that all of that can't be true. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The flag, which we've never confirmed is actually accurate, may be public domain, but this computer representation of it is not. It is a product of that website. The government didn't produce it. It was taken from a private site, without permission. This is like me painting a picture of the White House, then you take it and claim it's public domain. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:56, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry you don't understand copyright very well, and it's a shame it was deleted the first time because of that, but you are mistaken. US copyright law explicitly excludes government works from copyright. That means that this image as a derivative, can not be copyrighted under US law. Fry1989eh?01:11, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The flag itself may not be copyrighted, but this image may be because it was not created by the federal govt. If I took a photo of this flag, I could copyright that photo. The govt. produced the subject of that photo, but not the photo. In this case, the government may have produced this flag, but they did not produce the image that was uploaded here. Also, US copyright law doesn't exclude anything from a government, it excluded the Federal government.....who (allegedly) made the flag, but did not make this graphic. Who made this graphic? THAT is who holds the copyright to the image we have here. Additionally, the uploader links [3] as a source. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:37, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You can not copyright something in the United States which the American Government explicitly forbids being copyrighted. It's that simple. Fry1989eh?06:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not always the case, if it is a 2D copy of a PD work then yes, however a photo of three-dimensional PD object can have a separate copyright, the badge the uploader has picked looks like it is indeed a photo of a 3D badge, then the skill to light the frame, to edit out the background etc allows for the creation of a copyright. LGAtalkedits09:13, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you CAN copyright something the USG created. If Time magazine takes a picture of the Oval office and publishes it, you can't go lift it and put it here. Taxpayers may own the Oval Office, but we don't own that picture of it. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Um, yes, you can. The picture example I gave you is spot on. You could take all the pictures you want, but you don't have the rights to pictures someone else takes. Obviously I'm not the only one who thinks so. BTW, note how I responded without making my entire response bold text. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, you can not. As for how I choose to respond, that is none of your concern. If you don't like things being bolded, SAD DAY FOR YOU!Fry1989eh?21:05, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The manner can be my concern. Since you are responding directly to me, the manner is "my concern". However, I also recognize that I can't really change how you respond and if you decide to respond in a manner that looks so inappropriate and like you're yelling, you can do that. So really, not such a sad day for me.....just me being sad for you. BTW, your last 3 responses have been pretty much just you saying 'no you can't'. Very persuasive. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have to be persuasive to someone who clearly doesn't understand government exemption from copyright. I will reply to people as I wish and if you don't like how I choose to do so, it's a sad day for you. Fry1989eh?18:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, you don't have to be persuasive. You are free to adopt the "nuh uh" method of debate that is popular on grade school playgrounds everywhere. There is no sad day for me (no matter how many times you say it). The only sadness I feel is for you and your belief that your chosen method of debate is actually effective. Either way, my position clearly isn't a lone one, so pretending like I 'just don't understand it' is really silly. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Firstly the photo of a 3D badge is copyrightable and as there is no proof that the photo of the 3D badge taken from badgecards.com is a work of the US Federal Government this is not correctly licensed. Second this is not the flag of the United States Secret Service is a a mock-up of the flag and the use of the badge photo makes the image incorrect, fine for a grade 1 school project but no here. LGAtalkedits09:13, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Modify. Replace the badge section with File:US-SecretService-StarLogo.svg and delete the older version. I feel the photograph of the badge is of a 3D object. The photograph therefore is copyrightable. US.gov sites probably have a PD photo of the silver badge that can be used instead of the one that has source not licensed.--Canoe1967 (talk) 13:26, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That first one is a fake. The "junior secret service" agent badge isn't real. Second one doesn't seem usable. And can I ask again, where is the evidence that this representation of the flag is an accurate representation of the official flag? Aside from copyright, there is a WP:V issue. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Best Practices for Seizing Electronic Evidence book was printed by PriceWaterhouseCoopers, so I would assume the copyright is probably theirs. The cufflinks and US Flag with SS logo on it were a gift from the CISO of Bank of America, and are genuine. If better photos of those would be useful to you folks, just let me know. --xrayspx
Comment As it stands it is still a mock up, what editors think it should look like - have a look at this actual picture of a flag; nothing like this. As the flag is still in use, and the flag it's self is PD just take a picture of the one flying outside any of their offices. LGAtalkedits08:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If it is flying outside the office, we could presume it's an official flag (though not 100% accurate method). Otherwise, we have no evidence that it isn't locally produced. IF the flag is legit, then yes, you could take a picture and donate it to Wikipedia.....because you took the picture. It's yours.Niteshift36 (talk) 18:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but modify - The star should be replaced with a non-photorealistic image like the one in User:LGA's photo. This should be a free image since it's a US Government flag. FOX 52 (talk) 02:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is it? We've never seen a reliable source stating that this is an official flag. The closest we saw was a partial picture of one and nothing telling us that it's an official version. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:29, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I contacted a friend in DC to take a picture of a flag there. He will need a windy day or someone holding the flag to get a good flat shot. He may also ask for a shot of a silver badge.--Canoe1967 (talk) 04:25, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
I'd like to include the other 23 images uploaded by this user, User:Victoria.0702, in this same DR, as they are all of the same type, and have the same problems. It is also important to note that the images were uploaded in 2007, I asked about them in 2010, and now, noticing they are still here, decided to open the DR three years later. JesseW (talk) 07:39, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The other reasons to delete include: the lack of a plausible source, making it difficult to use them educationally, as we don't know what we are referring to; the fact that they haven't been used anywhere for over 6 years; and finally, the fact that while they may be PD due to lack of creativity, it's borderline, and not worth fighting about for such un-useful images. Does that help to clarify? JesseW (talk) 04:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nobody claimed they were PD due to lack of creativity; I see a GFDL-1.2+/cc-by-sa-1.0,2.0,2.5,3.0 tag on that description page. darkweasel9409:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Martin H in the AN discussion first brought up the PD possibility. He brought it up because the claimed license is very implausible, considering that the images were obviously scanned from a published book. So that adds an additional problem with the images -- that the uploaded license is invalid. JesseW (talk) 02:29, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Also, we don't know that someone hasn't replaced them with SVG -- we don't know exactly what they are depicting, so how could we know if they have been replaced? JesseW (talk) 04:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The file is used on English and Finnish Wikipedia, both of which accept fair use. The file should probably be copied to those before deleting, if it cannot be kept. --LPfi (talk) 20:50, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sami drum. It is possible that the image draws on a tradition and is not significantly different from other such images. See e.g. this image. Somebody who knows more about Sami art and handicraft or the threshold of originality should comment. --LPfi (talk) 20:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
*It is NOT the screen capture. The cropping was done using image editing tools manually. Not the strong reason to delete this media --Jenith (talk) 02:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Keep it's in use, so educationally useful (and imho would be even if it weren't in use because I'm sure that in reality there are such signs as well, even if they aren't in the law?). darkweasel9413:55, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination
Deutsch: Ich habe dies und jenes erst nach dem Löschantrag gesehen. Ich habe keine Lust auf Diskussionen dieser Art oder mich eventuell beschimpfen zu lassen. Ich bin nicht verheiratet mit dem Bild. Daher ist es mir jetzt egal was mit dem Bild geschieht. Hochachtungsvoll --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ14:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
English: Translate by google: I've seen this and that after the deletion request. I have no desire to leave such discussions might insult me or. I'm not married to the image. Therefore, it does not matter what happens to the picture me now. An admin should remove the like. Yours faithfully --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ14:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"There is no one-way to the left in Netherlands"???? Are you just stupid or what? If a two-way road crosses a one-way street, then by nature one side will face it going right, and the other side will face it going left. KeepFry1989eh?18:45, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I just dealt with another user claiming that because "it's not in the PDF, it doesn't exist" only days ago and now I'm facing it again. I wouldn't be so critical if the nomination reasoning didn't show such an utter lack of critical thinking. Are we really to believe that all one-way streets in the Netherlands go right and that there are no bisecting roads in such a position that from their viewpoint, the one-way would appear to be travelling left??? Fry1989eh?19:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France (see COM:FOP#France). The architect is Santiago Calatrava and is still alive. The station is therefore copyrighted for at least 71 years.
I have excluded some files of the category because they seemed to be COM:DM or does not show an original work.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Main subject is the tram, certainly for TGV 3, The tramstop is a later addition and not a artistic creation. The TGV 3 stop was a temporary stop and no longer exist. Smiley.toerist (talk) 06:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This user seems to mistake Wikimedia Commons for a political propaganda platform. He uploaded lots of images with lots of text in Aseri (I think) and English, all of them related to some political forces that seemingly wish to change some things in the northwestern part of Iran.
Of those uploads, several images were already deleted as clear copyvios, grabbed from somewhere on the web, Facebook etc. The rest of his uploads don't really look like the "own work" of a single uploader either and are quite likely also grabbed from the same sources, but apparently they are too recent, so the usual image search tools (Tineye, Google) don't find them yet. I therefore propose to delete them per the precautionary principle.
Comment Yesterday I categorize File:Saleh Ildirim.jpg, first checking for Copyvio. Today I know that it was nominated for deletion. All files of this User will be deleted in the future? Just because he has сopyvio in the contribution?--Ray Garraty (talk) 06:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This user uploaded many copyvios, and other files uploaded by him were deleted by request per the precautionary principle. Like the rest of his uploads, these files look not like uploader's own work, but like they're grabbed from the web, forums etc. They should also be deleted per the precautionary principle.
Delete Even if these were PD-own they would still be out of scope on low quality grounds, both technical and content. Maps as (very degraded) JPGs (some saved as PNGs!), hardcoded collages, mismatched fonts, careless spelling ("Az" vs. "AZ", "Arabian Golf"), MSPaint palette colors — and also unsubstantiated irredentist claims (a serious neutral map of claims would include a Greater Armenia; and on the other hand there don’t match the usual Turanist toponymy, geography, or vexillology I know of). We dont need this. -- Tuválkin✉23:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yes I agree, despite to be the own of this file and the guy who drawn it (I paint very bad, what do i do). If you want to delete right now, go ahead!. I don't have arguments for defend it. --Ravave (talk) 17:29, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Keep, is an exact copy of the image that exists in the Wikipedia in English, is due maintain, as it is under the public domain; addition already has the kind of permission, which reads as follows: "This work contains material which may be subject to legal restrictions resulting by the use of registered trademarks in one or more jurisdictions. Before using this content, please ensure of that you have the permission to use it under the laws and circumstances that would apply in case of wanting use it. you is solely responsible of ensuring that you not infringe the rights of author of this trademark."--Who's That Boy? 16:43, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Comment the license is apparently because of the limits of Upload Wizard license selection. The uploader requested help on selecting a correct license: Commons:Village pump/Archive/2013/07#What is the right template?. The correspondence (now hidden) matched {{PD-self}}. MKFI (talk) 19:35, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Question for Illegitimate Barrister : Firstly; was the file you uploaded created by a employee of the federal government of the US and if so was the underling flag created by a employee of the federal government ? If the answer to both is YES can you provide proof ? If the answer to either is NO then the file should not be hosted here. LGA talkedits 01:20, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(l).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(l).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(l).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(l).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(l).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(l).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(l).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(l).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(l).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(l).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[1]](http://www.xn--koleda-7pb.lv/wp-content/gallery/dislera-izspele/576262_499248643449295_652950608_n.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](http://www.badgecards.com/images/products/secret%20service%20silver%20badge.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
I withdraw my nomination.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
