Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/05/19
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Possoble Copyright violation. Work appears to have been created by Hardware Zone not the uploader. Zellfaze (talk) 00:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete http://press.epson.jp/img/ep/21_vpj-700_l.jpg Epson made it an has the same image they may licence it through OTRS to keep it in their articles.--Canoe1967 (talk) 01:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Epson product image still in use on the official website –moogsi (talk) 10:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
ajygtfuigyuiog Anon987123 (talk) 10:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. Jaqen (talk) 10:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
User doesn't appear to have the rights to license this. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 00:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
OTRS ticket:2013051910003473 claims this is a copyright violation. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The source site states "Welcome to the LondonFetishScene Wipipedia, the free-content Fetish and BDSM encyclopedia that anyone can edit.". Because anyone can edit, anyone can upload files there. Do they have the same OTRS system we have in place to ensure copyright concerns are addressed? I'm not so sure. Whilst the image is in scope, I think we simply need to apply COM:PRP here. However, I see the uploader on that site is still active; perhaps someone could contact them and ask them for a larger version of the file, or anything that proves their authorship. russavia (talk) 16:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment For OTRS. Please don't act upon free email accounts without taking some steps to reasonably verify the contact and the content of the ticket. Remember, en:on the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog. DMCA would be more suitable to this situation; if that editor on the other site agrees to provide a larger version and an OTRS permission; we can look at that too. But it's still a sticky situation where PRP applies in my mind purely because of the nature of the other site. russavia (talk) 16:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- I am the copyright holder - I have not given permission for this image to be used by anyone other than the girl in the picture. I have also asked London Fetish Scene to remove it, and sent various other take downs. Please remove this image immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahc99 (talk • contribs)
- Jahc99, if this is your copyright, we're happy to take it down. As you can probably understand we would like to verify you are the copyright holder to the image. Is there any way you can demonstrate that you hold copyright on the image? russavia (talk) 19:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, as likely copyvio. -- Cirt (talk) 07:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
The original, with my mark upon it, can be found Here: https://fetlife.com/users/506754/pictures/7512473. My e mail is (redacted) - I can of course provide the original file, with metadata, etc as well, though obviously just for verification of my claim, not for publishing! If you really need this? Or I can send you a dmca. Or you can just do the right thing and remove this illegal copy from the site.
Deleted: Author has provided originals, with metadata to myself via email (not done via OTRS so that they can be deleted). We now need to go thru all other uploads from that site, and suggest we put it on a blacklist. russavia (talk) 13:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The real ptb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Several US sports logos. It's doubtful the uploader is really the creator of these as claimed, they are also well above the threshold of originality.
- File:Ithaca Bulldogs.png
- File:La Farge Wildcats.png
- File:North Crawford Trojans.png
- File:DeSoto Pirates.png
- File:Seneca Indians.png
- File:Wauzeka-Steuben Hornets.png
- File:Weston Silver Eagles.png
Rosenzweig τ 22:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-trivial logos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
We have the Uruguayan flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 20:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 19:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:24, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:35, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 11:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 11:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 11:24, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:09, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document with images of questionable origins. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
to low quality Slick (talk) 11:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: I did notice a few image in this batch request that were less then useful. Ww2censor (talk) 09:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Date and author for this image are not given, so we are unable to determine its copyright status. It should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 19:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
User wants it deleted. Please delete now. Mousebray (talk) 23:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The uploader has requested its deletion
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Unused headshot of someone. Uploader blanked the page; possibly wanted the file deleted. –moogsi (talk) 12:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
This appears to be a direct copyvio of http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidwilson1949/4369615802/in/photostream/. This image is typical of David Wilson's work and Thundercat is banned for copyright infringement. Mackensen (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 12:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Brocken file, hence unused. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The file seems to be a derivative from some non-free image (example), and it is out of project scope, being useless for an educational purpose. Niklem (talk) 21:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 02:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Depiction of a photograph with unknown copyright status; low-res - better alternatives available. Eleassar (t/p) 09:13, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Bad copy of this Yikrazuul (talk) 11:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Bad copy of this Yikrazuul (talk) 11:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Pepito Tey (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Datei irrtümlich übermittelt. Statue befindet sich auf Privatgrund; deshalb bitte löschen.
Keep There is freedom of panorama in Austria. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Please delete. Sent by mistake. Statue stands on private property. Pepito Tey (talk) 14:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Don't open a Deletion request for your own uploads. Please use {{Speedy}} instead. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
EXIF clearly shows (c) by Peter Shih 2003 - does not match poster name Alexf (talk) 10:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The browser is not licensed under the CC-BY, nor is the Google search page. wL <speak·creatively> 09:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Not really in the scope. Eleassar (t/p) 09:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Flickr says: "This photo was taken on August 30, 2012 in Shaanxi, CN."
Another website seems to have had the image since February 2012, though: http://www.sxhkxy.com/html/2012-02/7297.html
Potential Flickrwashing. Stefan4 (talk) 17:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
EXIF clearly shows (c) by Peter Shih 2003 - does not match poster's name Alexf (talk) 10:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Actually Alexf I have no idea why the meta data is showing the name "Peter Shin" but the truth is those picture are really been clicked by me you can visit these links for more details http://atultiwariphotography.allyou.net, http//shutterpunch.deviantart.com, http://atultiwariphotography.daportfolio.com,http://atultiwariphotography.weebly.com,http://atultiwariphotography.webs.com.,you can also find some of my photography on National Geographic Magazine website's. I think that enough to prove that it is my work. (Vtatultiwari)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Low quality penis. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, not the best quality here, -- Cirt (talk) 07:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Low quality selfie. Please SALT the filename. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: --Krd 06:40, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
out of project scope Krd 06:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Please protect the filename against recreation. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:09, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, please do. --Diego Grez return fire 15:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete -- Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 22:36, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. Alan (talk) 04:16, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
File:IMPACT OF HIV-AIDS TO PRIMARY SCHOOL PUPILS ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN TANZANIA-STUDY CASE MBEYA CITY.pdf
[edit]Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 21:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
'bad quality', no 'educational use', and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland 01:47, 19 May 2013 (UTC) Roland 01:47, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
duplicate Grade Terre tunisienne O5.png Adnen1985 (talk) 14:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- {{Speedy}} please. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Image looks a lot like a screenshot from TV & the contributor seems to have a history of uploading the work of others without permission Nil Einne (talk) 18:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Same photo in better quality and higher resolution at http://www.flickr.com/photos/27639553@N05/2989223556/in/photostream/, where it is said to be from 1934. PD-70 seems hardly valid. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Brocken file and unused. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Non-free drawing from 1969 (per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia). Eleassar (t/p) 10:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
album cover Mjrmtg (talk) 11:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yup. Delete it! --/abbedabbtalk 20:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Non-free map from 1945. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 09:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Also:
- --Eleassar (t/p) 09:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
doubtful "own work" Mjrmtg (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Several copies in Google Images. Tm (talk) 14:20, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/94046063@N04/8587496487 says: "This photo was taken on March 25, 2013."
http://www.bijie.gov.cn/Html/bjyw/153324683.html says: "发布时间:2013-1-4 15:32:13"
This seems to be Flickrwashing. Stefan4 (talk) 18:02, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality image. Misidentified, not Haitian empress but a poorly cropped version Queen Emma of Hawaii and Prince Lunalilo from an engraving by Henri Theophile Hildibrand. -KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
COM:LL: http://www.lbx777.com/z_ql/s1x/qlsx073.htm Stefan4 (talk) 19:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Very low quality image - low resolution and pixelated. Was once the only freely licenced image of this person but now File:Matt_Neal,_Donington_Park,_Apr_2012.jpg and File:Matt_Neal_Donington_Park_May_2009.jpg are both available and used in articles in place of this image. Techtri (talk) 10:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, upload was only edit to wikipedia and it clearly shows border/shading as taken from a web page. MilborneOne (talk) 17:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- As with File:Non-specific Caterpillar Diesel Engine.jpg, this was an effort to split a file with two images. Unlike the previously mentioned file, I don't see any evidence of where else it was published, but the nom appears to have a valid complaint, so I vote
WeakDelete. --DanTD (talk) 17:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC) - Using Google, I found the image here although I can't see the image on that page. The exact link to the file, http://www.marinetalk.com/images/02-10-25/engine.jpg , suggests that the file was last changed in 2002, and the web server also returns 2002 as the date of last modification. 2002 is prior to the upload to Wikipedia (which was in 2007), so I would guess that this is a copyright violation. Therefore, Delete the file. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- So you found the source. Good for you. Looks like I can change my vote. ----DanTD (talk) 17:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The background image appears to be used elsewhere, such as http://s49.radikal.ru/i124/1008/68/2f83810eac7b.jpg. If this is a legitimate use of the background image, then as a derived work the sourcing would need to be clear and the source licence(s) open to verification. Additionally, this graphic is likely to be out of scope as I find it hard to think of the educational re-uses this might have. Fæ (talk) 13:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
This animation contains images (drawings of birds etc.) of unknown copyright status. Eleassar (t/p) 08:58, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the work of the uploader as it appears to be a standard cat publicity/sales image, original source not found but larger versions can be found like http://r1.cygnuspub.com/files/cygnus/image/OOH/2010/SEP/600x400/c18_a0039_10170828.jpg MilborneOne (talk) 16:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- This was an attempt to split an image with a generic name. However since the nom revealed the source, I have no other choice to vote to delete this image. ----DanTD (talk) 17:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete This was uploaded to Wikipedia in November 2008, but was already available here in August 2008. This is presumably a copyright violation. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation, self advertising by user Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
OpenLayers is BSD, but where did the map data come from? –moogsi (talk) 13:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Animation containing drawings and paintings of unknown copyright status. Eleassar (t/p) 09:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Also:
- --Eleassar (t/p) 09:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Painted by hand (not the best quality), and can be replaced by e.g. this. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Not the best quality, can be replaced, e.g. by this. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:35, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
This looks like a newspaper scan, but certainly not like the uploader's won work from 2013 as claimed. Rosenzweig τ 14:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Disparaging file name. Probable WP:BLP violation by user blocked in en:Wiki for adding slanderous material with one of the two noms. Poeticbent talk 07:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Date and author for this image are not given, so we are unable to determine its copyright status. It should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 19:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The animation contains photos of buildings (e.g. church in Odranci etc.) from Prekmurje that were deleted in previous DRs (per COM:FOP#Slovenia). Eleassar (t/p) 09:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be Flickrwashing from http://tieba.baidu.com/p/1333162472
Note that Flickr says 2013 while Baidu says 2011. Stefan4 (talk) 18:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
No FOP in Moldova, see COM:FOP#Moldova Gikü (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
duplicate of File:SkilletRisePhoto.jpg and both are copyright violations Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Not notable band - no encyclopedic value High Contrast (talk) 21:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Questionable "own work" and appears to be copyright vio. Doubtful that members of South Korean boy band SS501, posed for uploader to produce photoshoot/professional quality works. A google search of 'SS501 Persona Tour' shows that the clothing style is consistent and would require restricted access during the tour to capture such image. If not would like to see original EXIF data of images with details of when, where etc photos were taken. Michaela den (talk) 14:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The poster here fails COM:DM, making this photo a derivative work. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, agree with analysis by nom, above. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 07:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, image cropped to remove the derivative work. But Delete the old image from history. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted the first version in the history PierreSelim (talk) 06:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF ze-dan (talk) 06:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF ze-dan (talk) 06:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF ze-dan (talk) 06:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation, no permission stated Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
I doubt that this nice portrait is actually the work of its subject. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope and unused. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:13, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
to less quality, no EV Slick (talk) 15:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, but as the bot operator, please use {{Speedy}} instead. Amitie 10g (talk) 19:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
to less quality, no EV Slick (talk) 15:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:49, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
cute, but out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
doubt own work, looks more like c&p from a website Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be Flickrwashing from http://10.crec4.com/content-357-43-1.html and note that the date in the URL to the file on the Chinese website predates the Flickr date of photography. Stefan4 (talk) 18:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
COM:LL: http://220.249.97.103/news_content.jsp?id=201211281721570136&classid=20&typeid=3&upid=20 Stefan4 (talk) 19:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Appears to be Flickrwashing from http://www.fheb-xm.com/zaijiangongcheng/2011/1214/1543.html Stefan4 (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Focus of the image was a copyrighted user interface. Eleassar (t/p) 08:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope: no media file, no allowable PDF content. Rosenzweig τ 21:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
COM:LL: http://www.10yan.com/html/zt/60znxc/lxy/094833568.html Stefan4 (talk) 19:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
{{PD-RU-exempt}} cannot be used for this image High Contrast (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Extreme distortion. Probably out of project scope. A.Savin 09:04, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 21:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:Dlvo
[edit]- File:Glycosidic bonds between proteins and carbohydrates.jpg
- File:Reducing and Non-reducting Sugars.jpg
- File:Electroporation.jpg
- file:Transcription and processing mRNA.jpg
- File:CCI11092011 0001.jpg
- file:Ribose and Deoxyribose.jpg
- file:Water solid and liquid structures.jpg
All pictures are drawn by hand and presents not the best quality. Nothing we donna have already in better quality. Afaik unsued. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete all of them. Hand drawn image are not useful when high quality chemical structure images are trivial to create (out of COM:SCOPE). There are several errors in chemical structures with them too. Ed (Edgar181) 12:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
{{PD-RU-exempt}} cannot be used for this image. Among those nominated files are additionally some which are of false authorship claim or simply copyright violations
- File:IC-14.jpg
- File:ИК-13.jpg
- File:IK-12.jpg
- File:Космос-149.jpg
- File:Kosmos-149.jpg
- File:77i10.jpg
- File:87i10.jpg
- File:IC-10.png
- File:IC-10-2.jpg
- File:Intercosmos-5.jpg
- File:3232871 orig.jpg
- File:SatMex-8-launch.jpg
- File:K-3 band.png
- File:K-2 band.png
- File:K-1 band.png
- File:C-band.png
- File:Satmex 8.jpg
- File:Kepler-76.jpg
- File:Resurs dk1.jpg
- File:2012 04 16 pic3.jpg
- File:2012 04 16 pic2.jpg
- File:Око Космос 2422.jpg
- File:Космос-53.png
- File:Интеркосмос-3-Значок.jpg
- File:Intercosmos-3.left.jpg
- File:Intercosmos-3.post.jpg
- File:Интеркосмос - 3.jpg
- File:Интеркосмос-3.jpg
- File:Kosmos-119 ds-u2-i image.jpg
- File:Космос-49 магнитограмма.jpg
- File:Космос-49-магнитная карта Земли.jpg
- File:Dsu2gka.jpg
- File:Oreol-1.jpg
- File:Oreol.jpg
- File:Kosmos-461 ds-u2-mt image.jpg
- File:ДС-У2-К.png
- File:Kosmos-321 ds-u2-mg image.jpg
- File:Kosmos-262 ds-u2-gf image.jpg
- File:Kosmos-97 ds-u2-m image.jpg
- File:Kosmos-97 ds-u2-m image2.jpg
- File:Kosmos-26 ds-mg image.jpg
- File:Kosmos-261.jpg
- File:Kosmos-137.jpg
- File:Космос-378.jpg
- File:ДС-У2-ИП.png
- File:ДС-У2-МГ.png
- File:ДС-У2-ГФ.png
- File:ДС-У2-ГК.png
- File:ДС-У2-Д.png
- File:ДС-У2-МП.png
- File:ДС-У2-В.png
- File:ДС-МТ.png
- File:ДС-МГ.png
- File:1996astro.jpg
- File:Nasa16.gif
- File:Nasa13.png
- File:Burdaev.jpg
- File:Ops2.jpg
- File:B4179545075b.jpg
- File:Soyuz-scheme.jpg
- File:Союз-11-цветная.jpg
- File:Союз-11.jpg
- File:Союз-1.jpg
- File:511 611b.jpg
- File:Soyuz block I.jpg
- File:Soyuz SAS.jpg
- File:Block I Soyuz.jpg
- File:Soyuz Spacecraft.jpg
- File:Souyz Baikonur.jpg
- File:Soyuz-11 rescue block.jpg
- File:Samarskie stupeni2.png
- File:11A511 Soyuz Drawing.png
- File:35892401 Soyuz 11A511.jpg
- File:7k-vi5.jpg
- File:7K-VI-4.jpg
- File:Soyuz-7K-Vi.jpg
- File:7k-vi2.jpg
- File:7K-VI-design.jpg
- File:7K-VI-image.jpg
High Contrast (talk) 19:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- What I need to do to correct license? and Why {{PD-RU-exempt}} is inccorect template?
- I fear that these images cannot be kept on Commons. Commons is a free media host which means that many images cannot appear here (without special permissions). --High Contrast (talk) 14:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. I'll try to find the right licenses and find information about the original sources.7emenoff (talk) 07:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- I fear that these images cannot be kept on Commons. Commons is a free media host which means that many images cannot appear here (without special permissions). --High Contrast (talk) 14:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Jailani johari.jpg
- File:Ah Shabery Cheek.png
- File:Ahmad Shabery Cheek.jpg
- File:Mohd-Bakri-Zinin.jpg
- File:Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anciensbalzaciens (talk · contribs)
[edit]Those files are obviously not the uploader's own work from 2013 as claimed, so the licenses are not valid. They should either be given proper descriptions, authors, dates, permissions or rationales why they are in the public domain (if applicable), or else they should get deleted.
- File:Balzac caserne AB.JPG
- File:Plan Kenitra.JPG
- File:Résident Général Nogues visite école.jpg
- File:Mohamed V Kenitra.jpg
- File:Balzac 5ème 1964-1965.jpg
- File:Balzac caserne 1er régiment de tirailleurs marocains.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 21:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The Flickr account Geomeng (94046063@N04) mainly seems to be used for Flickrwashing, so I'm not sure if it would be wise to keep these images.
- Example deletion requests:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Qingshi Yellow River Bridge.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yantan Yellow River Bridge.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yongchuan Yangtze River Bridge under construction.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Liuchong River Bridge.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Headquarters building of SAIC.JPG
- List of files to delete:
- File:Geogeum Bridge's motor lane.jpg
- File:Ping'an International Finance Center under construction (2013).jpg
- File:Hezhang Bridge.jpg
- File:Qingchuan Bridge.jpg
- File:Jiangshun Bridge under construction.JPG
- File:Lihua Bridge.jpg (added by Lymantria)
Stefan4 (talk) 18:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete them all. I regret I passed some of them. This uploader has a flickr, panoramio and picasa account too. Three accounts is way too much. The image from his picasa account was used to upload a laundered image in this DR taken from a web site. Also there is this DR --Leoboudv (talk) 18:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Under the list of files to delete, I see a Sony, Canon, Nikon camera metadata...and even a Xiaomi camera? How many cameras does this uploader have. This tells me that this uploader must be taking other people's images and uploading them here. If it was only 2 cameras, it might be OK as people upgrade to a better camera but four? --Leoboudv (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Likely Flickrwashing. I added one image to the list that is inside this scope as well. Lymantria (talk) 07:51, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Files from Panoramio user "Bru216" appear to be licence washing. Also, as these files were uploaded by Commons user "Bru216", it doesn't seem unlikely that this is the user's own account and that files uploaded as "own work" also are copyright violations. Lots of camera models were used and at least one image has a watermark from a website.
- Example deletion requests:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Matouguan Yellow River Bridge.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yunyang Han River Highway Bridge.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yingwuzhou Yangtze River Bridge under construction.jpg
- List of files to delete:
- File:Shichuan Yellow River Suspension Bridge.jpg
- File:Longju Yellow River Bridge.jpg
- File:Fuzhou Huai'an Bridge.jpg
- File:Tongling Yangtze River Road-Railway Bridge under construction.jpg
- File:Jingyue Yangtze River Bridge.jpg
- File:Nanjing Yangtze River Third Bridge.jpg
- File:Jiang'an Yangtze River Bridge.jpg
- File:Chongqi Bridge.jpg
- File:Junshan Yangtze River Bridge.jpg
- File:Runyang Yangtze River Bridge.jpg
- File:Zhanjiang Bay Bridge.jpg
- File:Yajisha Bridge.jpg
- File:Maocaojie Bridge.jpg
- File:Jinan Yellow River 3rd Bridge.jpg
- File:Nanning Bridge.jpg
- File:Huangshan Taipinghu Bridge.jpg
- File:Yonghe Bridge.jpg
- File:Danzhou Yangpu Bridge.jpg
- File:Zhaohua Jialing River Bridge.jpg
- File:Maguo River Bridge.jpg
- File:Fenfangwan Bridge.jpg
- File:Xiamen-Zhangzhou Bridge under construction 2012.jpg
- File:Surgut Bridge.jpg
- File:Donghai Bridge's main span.JPG
- File:Myodo Bridge.jpg
- File:Daliaohe Bridge.jpg
- File:Shibangou Bridge.jpg
- File:Dafosi Bridge.jpg
- File:QEII Bridge.jpg
- File:Queshi Bridge.jpg
- File:Xiangshan Port Bridge.jpg
- File:Foshan Pingsheng Bridge.jpg
- File:Xianshenhe Bridge.JPG
- File:Liuzhou Shuangyong Bridge.jpg
- File:Nanjing Yangtze River 4th Bridge.JPG
- File:Kao-Ping Hsi Bridge.jpg
- File:Qingzhou Minjiang Bridge.jpg
- File:Aizhai-Bridge-birdview-2.jpg
- File:Aizhai-Bridge-birdview-1.jpg
- File:Pont Niouc.jpg
- File:Viadotto Sente.jpg
- File:Buliuhe Bridge.jpg
- File:Zhegaohe Bridge.jpg
- File:Puente San Cristóbal.jpg
- File:Viadotto Gorsexio.jpg
- File:Viadotto Italia.jpg - speedy, stolen from [1]
- File:Karun 3 Dam Bridge.jpg
- File:BALUARTE-Bridge.jpg
- File:Siduhe-Bridge.jpg
- File:Luojiaohe-Bridge.jpg
- File:Jiangjiehe-Bridge.jpg
- File:Guozigou-Bridge.jpg
- File:Hegigio-Gorge-Pipeline-Bridge.jpg
- File:Balinghe-Bridge.jpg
- File:Furongjiang-Bridge.jpg
- File:Glade-Creek-Bridge.jpg
- File:Mangjiedu Bridge.jpg
- File:Viadotto Platano.jpg
- File:Furongjiang Bridge.jpg
- File:Labajin Bridge.jpg
- File:Jiangjiehe Bridge.jpg
- File:Jiashao Bridge under construction.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 19:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- delete them all: This user is likely engaged in mass license washing. He uploads images taken in different years with different cameras...and the image output is not consistent. See the camera metadata:
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Viadotto_Italia.jpg 2008 date; Canon camera
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jiashao_Bridge_under_construction.jpg 2012 date; Nikon camera
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hegigio-Gorge-Pipeline-Bridge.jpg 2006 date; Nikon camera
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Surgut_Bridge.jpg 2007 date; Sony camera
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fenfangwan_Bridge.jpg 2012 date; Olympus camera
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fuzhou_Huai%27an_Bridge.jpg 2012 date; Canon camera
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Qingzhou_Minjiang_Bridge.jpg ; comment: low quality
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aizhai-Bridge-birdview-1.jpg ; medium-high resolution but no metadata?
- Comment: So the image output (low and high quality images) and camera models used is not consistent: In 2012, he used a Nikon, Olympus and Canon camera all in the same year? And in 2006, he used a Nikon camera, but in 2007, he used a Sony camera...and in 2008, a Canon camera. Why so many different camera models. From the other DRs of his images this suggests to me that he is taking other people's images and uploading them as his own on his flickr and panoramio accounts. They should be blacklisted and this uploader should be sanctioned or banned. On my userpage, I clearly say, I have only 2 cameras. If I have a third, I will say it. It seems Bru216 now has 4 cameras at least. Now 5 cameras, I forgot the Xiaomi camera here. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Another thing I noticed (checking only the ones with geographical coordinates on the file information page) is that the files were taken at very different locations in China. Some in the north-east, some in the south, some more central. A small number of images were taken outside China (some from South Korea, one from the UK with website watermark, one from Italy and one from the United States). Most people live in one city and work in either the same city or a nearby city, so most people would mainly take photos from more or less the same small geographical area (say, within 50 or 100 km from your home), whereas there would be much fewer images from other locations (for example taken during holiday trips or visits to your friends or relatives), but this user's images don't seem follow that pattern. They seem to be more evenly spread out on all parts of China. There could of course be a reason for a more even distribution of the images (for example if you work as a lorry driver or as a pilot), but it's not the way a person's image contributions usually are distributed. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Yikes! You're right. The UK image even says the copyright owner is 'www.quanjing.com', not the Bru216 and its in Britain, not China or South Korea. This uploader is just taking images randomly from the web and placing it on his panoramio account. Someone has to act or Commons could get sued. I hope an Admin will act tomorrow. This case gets worse and worse. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carrie Wong Hui Suan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Lee Yen Athena.jpg
- File:Danny One.jpg
- File:Crayon Shin-chan.jpg
- File:Fabien.jpg
- File:Hey Girl.jpg
- File:黃以安.jpg
- File:黃暐婷.jpg
- File:Albee小薰.jpg
- File:Genie ChuoHK.jpg
- File:Stacy Zhou.jpg
- File:Emma Wu.jpg.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carrie Wong Hui Suan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- 1. File:陈慧恬.jpg
- 2. File:陈诗莉.jpg
- 3. File:黄瑄.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- File #2 is a copyv from http://k.mengxiang.org/index.php?edition-view-263259-3.html#section, #3 is from http://www.todaynews.com.tw/bencandy.php?fid-11-id-4341-page-1.htm. All copyvios, Commons:Image casebook#Internet images. --Martin H. (talk) 20:32, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Internet images uploaded without a license (or dubious claims of authorship). Delete as copyright violations.
- File:Lenguaje SMS..jpg
- File:Samsung Galaxy S III..jpg
- File:Evolución de los móviles desde 1995 hasta 2007..jpg
Senator2029 19:13, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work.
- File:Paulo Da Silva comercial de axe apollo.jpg
- File:Paulo da silva comercial de clight.JPG
- File:El actor y musico paulo da silva.jpg
- File:Paulo da silva actor, músico y materalizador de sueños.jpg
- File:Actor Paulo da silva foto.jpg
- File:El actor Paulo da silva.jpg
- File:Paulo da silva actor y músico.jpg
- File:Paulo E. Da Silva.jpg
- File:Paulo ezequiel da silva.jpg
- File:Paulo da silva actor y musico.jpg
- File:Paulo da silva 5.jpg
- File:Paulo da silva actor.jpg
- File:Paulo da silva.jpg
High Contrast (talk) 23:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jamal.kakbra (talk · contribs)
[edit]I very much doubt that the uploader was authorized to put this logo under GFDL and CC licenses.
Rosenzweig τ 22:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope
- File:Om sarkar 1st.jpg
- File:Om sarkar playing guiter.jpg
- File:A1Image(014)~.jpg
- File:FREE koletta me my lovers GFTJUTJUTJDG.jpg
- File:Ed taking some pose.jpg
- File:YA YA HOW IS THAT GGGGG.jpg
- File:Yarcaud parhhh.jpg
- File:WwImage(322).jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Palangana1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two images of an unknown dog. What purpose are they supposed to serve?
Rosenzweig τ 21:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rihanna xxl-18 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not uploader's "own work", likely copyright violations. Files lack descriptions and categories. Test uploads from a new user.
- File:Wonderfull day.jpg
- File:Bonne anné 3.jpg
- File:Allah akbar.jpg
- File:3 crazy.jpg
- File:Nice place.jpg
Senator2029 11:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
A bunch of personal images which are not in use. Out of project scope.
- File:Theresa Blaire Laroco with.jpg
- File:SHESAISO.png
- File:SAI LOPEZ LAROCO.jpg
- File:Blaire laroco.png
- File:Blaire Laroco.jpg
- File:Theresa Blaire Laroco.PNG
- File:Theresa Blaire Laroco.png
Rosenzweig τ 21:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shivute ya christof (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope, big green frame makes the first image useless anyway.
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Looks like collection of promo/fan photos, not own work.
- File:Mopiconstreet.jpg
- File:Streetsanpshot.jpg
- File:Molaitravel.JPG
- File:Molaiblackandwhite.JPG
- File:Molai.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vicentecastro07 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely that these images are actually uploader's own work: small size, no Exif, another upload by this user was a clear copyvio.
Rosenzweig τ 22:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, lots of previous uploads of this user were copyvios. --Rosenzweig τ 22:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vivek.amity (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Spam, unusable for educational purposes due to watermark with email.
- File:Принадлежности поворотного датчика высоты Digi-Rotary.jpg
- File:Спиральный кабель автоматики асфальтоукладчиков Vogele.jpg
- File:Спиральный кабель с резьбовой фиксацией разъемов.jpg
- File:Приборы автоматики MOBA.jpg
- File:Стенд для проверки приборов автоматики нивелирования и спиральных кабелей MOBA.jpg
- File:Контроллер прибор автоматики GS-506 Moba.jpg
- File:Спиральный кабель с разъемами фиксации байонет.jpg
- File:Ультразвуковой цифровой датчик высоты Sonic Ski plus.jpg
- File:Y-образный спиральный кабель.jpg
- File:Адаптер для автоматики Moba.jpg
- File:Адаптер автоматики Moba.jpg
- File:Сумматор-распределитель автоматики MOBA-matic-2.JPG
- File:Сумматор-распределитель автоматики Moba-matic-2.JPG
- File:Датчик наклона (уклона) для асфальтоукладчика.jpg
- File:Проверка приборов автоматики нивелирования СДМ.JPG
- File:Разъемы для спиральных кабелей АСУ СДМ.JPG
- File:Контрольно-демонстрационный блок.JPG
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Watermark removed now, avaible for educational purposes. ----MGuf (d) 09:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
out of scope, all unused (file YA.jpg not in use on ruwiki)
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Youpping Spain (talk · contribs)
[edit]spam, out of scope
- File:Logotipo.tif
- File:Youpping Logo.tif
- File:Logo Youpping.jpg
- File:Youpping.jpg
- File:Y-Commerce.jpg
- File:Beneficios del y-commerce para el comercio.jpg
- File:Historia del comercio.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Kobe Matsuri 2010 Parade
[edit]Main subject of image are copyrighted mascots, and Most of screen are recent artworks. No COM:FOP#Japan.
- File:Kobe Matsuri2010 Parade1 DSCN9845 20100516.JPG
- File:Kobe Matsuri2010 Parade2 DSCN9847 20100516.JPG
- File:Kobe Matsuri2010 Parade3 DSCN9855 20100516.JPG
--Vantey (talk) 03:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Max Camis artworks
[edit]- File:Camis - Curé de Tour p1 ill.1.jpeg
- File:Camis - Curé de Tour p1 ill.2.jpeg
- File:Camis - Curé de Tour p15.jpeg
- File:Camis - Curé de Tour p27.jpeg
These images were all uploaded by User:Sapcal22. Max Camis (1890-1985) is not in public domain. --82.120.160.205 14:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Photos uploaded by Kubast12
[edit]Recently I found evidences that all other photos uploaded by this user as "own work" were actually taken from other websites. Also many of his uploads were deleted in the past as copyvios.[2] These two left, we can see that there is no EXIF metadata on both files which may indicate that the were taken from some facebook profiles like many other copyvio photos uploaded by him. --Oleola (talk) 01:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
imho that flickr-transer is a violation of privacy & personality rights of children / individuals not in public life respectively the parents/responsibles would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, please also see face of the men photographed, Roland 01:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
imho that flickr-transer is a violation of privacy & personality rights of children / individuals not in public life respectively the parents/responsibles would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, please also see face of the men photographed, Roland 01:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted by request of the artist. 414mqk (talk) 01:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Eliminar fotografia a pedido do artista. Silviahidalgo (talk) 02:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted by request of Antonio Alonso Martinez RichardDavidCohen (talk) 02:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Disparaging file name. Questionable WP:BLP use in en:Wiki. Poeticbent talk 03:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
The name of the file is not disparaging. Both persons in the photo affectionately call each other Piglet in Polish. Polish Piglets is their Pet name as part of the way they live their extra marital relationship. The photo has no copyright and its author posted it freely online for any use as long as it is not commercial. Nothing posted about these individuals is defaming unless the mention of a real and active Interpol investigation against them qualifies as "defaming". The persons in this photo have been under an open Interpol investigation since 2009 as suspected employees of a Human trafficking investigation. Before you disparage free speech, you should pull the Interpol report on Przemek Ristok and Beata Dabrowska and think again.
There is nothing defaming in mentioning facts. The couple call each other Piglet. They are Polish and they are being investigated by the Interpol. The file nam PolishPiglets was chosen only because Piglets waas already in use on wikimedia. If you want to change or have the file upload differently then please state so. Any questions?
Deleted: already deleted Lupo 08:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Del Aor is born in 1950. Copyright violation. 82.124.47.142 12:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation Aloneinthewild (talk) 16:02, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation, scanned caot of arms Aloneinthewild (talk) 16:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
dont want to this pic Arslan malik2255 (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
dont want to this pic Arslan malik2255 (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
The book cover is a copyrighted work and Commons:De minimis does not apply in this case. Ileana n (talk) 15:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
It is the photo of the author of a book, with the book in his hands. It is a portrait of the author! And, by the way, he is also the owner of the copyright of the book. It looks that you defend him against himself. The defence of this minor part of the photo (the cover of the book) does not apply in this case. User:gabibis1796
- The book cover is a copyrighted work (yes, by the same person on the photo, en:Carlos Núñez Cortés of en:Les Luthiers), an needs an OTRS ticket. The image was uploaded only to illustrate the article of the book in the Spanish Wikipedia so the intention is clearly to submit the book cover, which is just as important as the person in the photo. That's why de minimis does not apply, it can't be cropped.--Ileana n (talk) 23:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment An OTRS ticket was sent (#2013052010008939) and it is being analyzed. I recommend waiting until resolution before taking a decision. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: On hold pending OTRS, per Banfield Alan (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Overberg as Speedy (löschen) and the most recent rationale was: URV--Overberg (talk) 13:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Converted to DR as no evidence for the claimed copyvio (=URV in German) provided. As the image is in use, nominator is asked to provide evidence for the copyvio-claim, either on-wiki or privately per email to OTRS (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org). -- Túrelio (talk) 13:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
delete. The uploader has now expressedly stated that these are not his photos[3]. Even though I still have doubts whether this isn't merely resulting from a quarrel on :de, I think we need to comply with his request. Anyway, neither Wikipedia nor Commons will suffer much from the deletion as the images can easily be re-shot by anybody on holiday in this region. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)- I've changed my vote after what happened today (abusive mass-speedy-tagging by Overberg and shown to be SP of Sendker). --Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Deutsch: Nach der ausdrücklichen Aussage des Uploaders "Die Photos gehören nicht mir, ich versichere die URV," sehe ich keine Möglichkeit dem Löschverlangen nicht zu entsprechen, selbst wenn ich persönlich immer noch nicht von der Angabe überzeugt bin. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glane.JPG and Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Sendker. Overberg has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts.
Watzmann Talk 20:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glane.JPG and Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Sendker. Overberg has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts.
A lower-resolution version of this photo had been uploaded in 2006 by User:Sendker (master-account of SP Overberg) as File:Glane04.jpg, who had requested its deletion in 2012 (without a valid speedy-rationale), which had been performed nevertheless, but now reverted by me. This image version is still in use at academic.ru. Thereby, the author-entry should be changed to Sendker and Keep. --Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea. Lymantria (talk) 07:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP in South Kotrea for modern buildings, art and architectural works including bridges. This must be deleted. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Comment There is also a deletion request for another image from the same Flickr account, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seohae Bridge.jpg, where there additionally seems to be a problem with Flickrwashing. Does it mean that we can't trust that images from this Flickr account are own works? --Stefan4 (talk) 11:20, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Is something like {{Useful-object-US}} applicable in S. Korea?--Elvey (talk) 00:33, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- No idea. However, photos of buildings are not OK, as seen in the UV House case. Also, the Flickr account seems to have been used exclusively for Flickrwashing, so the FOP issue is less important here. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Indeed, the Flickr-account turned out to be a Flickrwashing account, we noticed this after my DR above, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bru216. Lymantria (talk) 11:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Overberg as Speedy (löschen) and the most recent rationale was: URV--Overberg (talk) 13:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Converted to DR as no evidence for the claimed copyvio (=URV in German) provided. As the image is in use, nominator is asked to provide evidence for the copyvio-claim, either on-wiki or privately per email to OTRS (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org). -- Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
delete. The uploader has now expressedly stated that these are not his photos[4]. Even though I still have doubts whether this isn't merely resulting from a quarrel on :de, I think we need to comply with his request. Anyway, neither Wikipedia nor Commons will suffer much from the deletion as the images can easily be re-shot by anybody on holiday in this region. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)- I've changed my vote after what happened today (abusive mass-speedy-tagging by Overberg and shown to be SP of Sendker). --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Deutsch: Nach der ausdrücklichen Aussage des Uploaders "Die Photos gehören nicht mir, ich versichere die URV," sehe ich keine Möglichkeit dem Löschverlangen nicht zu entsprechen, selbst wenn ich persönlich immer noch nicht von der Angabe überzeugt bin. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glane.JPG and Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Sendker. Overberg has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts.
Watzmann Talk 20:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glane.JPG and Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Sendker. Overberg has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts.
A lower-resolution version of this photo had been uploaded in 2006 by User:Sendker (master-account for SP Overberg) as File:Glane02.jpg, which he had deleted (without valid speedy-rationale) on May 13, 2012; image is still in use on academic.ru. Thereby, author-entry should be changed to Sendker and Keep. --Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
There's a ector graphic called Tencent Logo.svg. Someone's Moving Castle (talk) 04:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Overberg as Speedy (löschen) and the most recent rationale was: URV--Overberg (talk) 13:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Converted to DR as no evidence for the claimed copyvio (=URV in German) provided. As the image is in use, nominator is asked to provide evidence for the copyvio-claim, either on-wiki or privately per email to OTRS (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org). -- Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete. The uploader has now expressedly stated that these are not his photos[5]. Even though I still have doubts whether this isn't merely resulting from a quarrel on :de, I think we need to comply with his request. Anyway, neither Wikipedia nor Commons will suffer much from the deletion as the images can easily be re-shot by anybody on holiday in this region. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)- I've changed my vote after what happened today (abusive mass-speedy-tagging by Overberg and shown to be SP of Sendker). --Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Deutsch: Nach der ausdrücklichen Aussage des Uploaders "Die Photos gehören nicht mir, ich versichere die URV," sehe ich keine Möglichkeit dem Löschverlangen nicht zu entsprechen, selbst wenn ich persönlich immer noch nicht von der Angabe überzeugt bin. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glane.JPG and Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Sendker. Overberg has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts.
Watzmann Talk 20:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glane.JPG and Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Sendker. Overberg has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts.
Files uploaded by Mattpbarry (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:Hilton paddler at Mission.JPG
- File:Singing Hilton school song.jpg
- File:Hilton MHS 1.jpg
- File:Hilton College Jazz Band.jpg
- File:IMG 0713 (Medium).JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- File:Hilton College Jazz Band.jpg, File:Singing Hilton school song.jpg and File:Hilton MHS 1.jpg are all taken off the Hilton College website and I have recently gotten the correct permissions. However I did take File:IMG 0713 (Medium).JPG using my iPhone and File:Hilton paddler at Mission.JPG using my DSLR and re-sized both to be the same height (768px). Mattpbarry (talk) 18:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: 2 kept, rest deleted as copyvios FASTILY 23:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mattpbarry (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos/patterns, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
SVG at File:Pohyblivý most (cz).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:20, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 23:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Was not PD on URAA date. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 19:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- This file is in public domain since 1999. No reason for deletion at all. See the concept of "convenient forum" in Deror Avi's lecture "A common answer to Commons problem" presented at Wikimania 2012.Oyoyoy (talk) 12:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- I went through the whole thing and that was a suggestion not an actual policy. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 12:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is not a suggestion, nor Deror Avi's invention. I suggest that you read some of the vast legal literature on "convenient forum" and realize that Israeli copyright law is supreme in this case (a picture taken and published in Israel). Oyoyoy (talk) 19:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- See Commons:Licensing#Interaction_of_United_States_copyright_law_and_non-US_copyright_law and the section immediately below that. I'm saying that it is arguing for a change in Commons policy. Also, if an admin has to delete this image, almost all of the images on your userpage would have to be too. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 21:15, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is not a suggestion, nor Deror Avi's invention. I suggest that you read some of the vast legal literature on "convenient forum" and realize that Israeli copyright law is supreme in this case (a picture taken and published in Israel). Oyoyoy (talk) 19:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- I went through the whole thing and that was a suggestion not an actual policy. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 12:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently still copyrighted FASTILY 23:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
imho that flickr-transer is a violation of privacy & personality rights of children / individuals not in public life respectively the parents/responsibles would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, please also see image description, Roland 01:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC) Roland 01:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 03:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
imho that flickr-transer is a violation of privacy & personality rights of children / individuals not in public life respectively the parents/responsibles would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, please also see image description, Roland 01:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC) Roland 01:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY 03:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Highly likely not the uploader's own work -- false license claims High Contrast (talk) 23:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
• I wasn't sure how to list whose work it was, but have just modified it to say "author unknown". The photo was given to me by Eisenberg's family so it could be added to the Wikipedia page about him. They don't know who took the photo; he, his wife and his children are all dead. The only photo I previously had showed him in profile. The photo was taken in the 1940s; Eisenberg died in 1964. I scanned the photo from a print; no one knows where the negative is and the photographer is likely dead. Marrante (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Also, as an author, would he not be considered a public figure? I believe this photo was used for publicity and may have been used when he made a speaking tour across the US in the 1950s. I was given a second photo of him taken in 1958 of him at his desk in his library, as well. Marrante (talk) 23:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- I have now added the PD-heir license, which I should have done at the outset. I hope this solves the problem. Marrante (talk) 10:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- The CC-license is still given. --High Contrast (talk) 17:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Whoops, thanks. Forgot to remove it, but I have done that now. Marrante (talk) 19:46, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- The CC-license is still given. --High Contrast (talk) 17:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- I have now added the PD-heir license, which I should have done at the outset. I hope this solves the problem. Marrante (talk) 10:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- I don't see at all why {{PD-heir}} should apply. The photographer is not known, so how could we know that the photographer's heirs have placed his in the public domain?? It might be PD due to having been published in the U.S. without copyright notice, or copyright not renewed, but PD-heir is clearly bogus. Lupo 09:07, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- It's not the photographer's heirs, it's Eisenberg's heirs, which I guess I did not make clear. They regard the photo to be their property, and I assumed it was, which is why I chose PD-heir. If PD-heir is no good, what would you recommend using? Marrante (talk) 13:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you are the uploader, contact COM:OTRS FASTILY 03:36, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
No evidence for the PD-status of this image. The source is insufficient High Contrast (talk) 21:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Image 4. Kelly (talk) 21:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- You must add this info to the file page. --High Contrast (talk) 21:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)