Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/05/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 19th, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possoble Copyright violation. Work appears to have been created by Hardware Zone not the uploader. Zellfaze (talk) 00:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete http://press.epson.jp/img/ep/21_vpj-700_l.jpg Epson made it an has the same image they may licence it through OTRS to keep it in their articles.--Canoe1967 (talk) 01:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Epson product image still in use on the official website –⁠moogsi (talk) 10:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ajygtfuigyuiog Anon987123 (talk) 10:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. Jaqen (talk) 10:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User doesn't appear to have the rights to license this. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 00:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket:2013051910003473 claims this is a copyright violation. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete The source site states "Welcome to the LondonFetishScene Wipipedia, the free-content Fetish and BDSM encyclopedia that anyone can edit.". Because anyone can edit, anyone can upload files there. Do they have the same OTRS system we have in place to ensure copyright concerns are addressed? I'm not so sure. Whilst the image is in scope, I think we simply need to apply COM:PRP here. However, I see the uploader on that site is still active; perhaps someone could contact them and ask them for a larger version of the file, or anything that proves their authorship. russavia (talk) 16:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment For OTRS. Please don't act upon free email accounts without taking some steps to reasonably verify the contact and the content of the ticket. Remember, en:on the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog. DMCA would be more suitable to this situation; if that editor on the other site agrees to provide a larger version and an OTRS permission; we can look at that too. But it's still a sticky situation where PRP applies in my mind purely because of the nature of the other site. russavia (talk) 16:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am the copyright holder - I have not given permission for this image to be used by anyone other than the girl in the picture. I have also asked London Fetish Scene to remove it, and sent various other take downs. Please remove this image immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahc99 (talk • contribs)
    • Jahc99, if this is your copyright, we're happy to take it down. As you can probably understand we would like to verify you are the copyright holder to the image. Is there any way you can demonstrate that you hold copyright on the image? russavia (talk) 19:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete, as likely copyvio. -- Cirt (talk) 07:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The original, with my mark upon it, can be found Here: https://fetlife.com/users/506754/pictures/7512473. My e mail is (redacted) - I can of course provide the original file, with metadata, etc as well, though obviously just for verification of my claim, not for publishing! If you really need this? Or I can send you a dmca. Or you can just do the right thing and remove this illegal copy from the site.


Deleted: Author has provided originals, with metadata to myself via email (not done via OTRS so that they can be deleted). We now need to go thru all other uploads from that site, and suggest we put it on a blacklist. russavia (talk) 13:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The real ptb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Several US sports logos. It's doubtful the uploader is really the creator of these as claimed, they are also well above the threshold of originality.

Rosenzweig τ 22:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Non-trivial logos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have the Uruguayan flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 20:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 19:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:24, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:35, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 11:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 11:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 11:24, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational content Hasenläufer (talk) 10:09, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document with images of questionable origins. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to low quality Slick (talk) 11:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Date and author for this image are not given, so we are unable to determine its copyright status. It should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 19:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User wants it deleted. Please delete now. Mousebray (talk) 23:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete The uploader has requested its deletion

Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused headshot of someone. Uploader blanked the page; possibly wanted the file deleted. –⁠moogsi (talk) 12:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a direct copyvio of http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidwilson1949/4369615802/in/photostream/. This image is typical of David Wilson's work and Thundercat is banned for copyright infringement. Mackensen (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 12:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brocken file, hence unused. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file seems to be a derivative from some non-free image (example), and it is out of project scope, being useless for an educational purpose. Niklem (talk) 21:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several images appear in this collage. The source and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient. High Contrast (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 02:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depiction of a photograph with unknown copyright status; low-res - better alternatives available. Eleassar (t/p) 09:13, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad copy of this Yikrazuul (talk) 11:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad copy of this Yikrazuul (talk) 11:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Pepito Tey (talk) 17:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Datei irrtümlich übermittelt. Statue befindet sich auf Privatgrund; deshalb bitte löschen.[reply]

 Keep There is freedom of panorama in Austria. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete. Sent by mistake. Statue stands on private property. Pepito Tey (talk) 14:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF clearly shows (c) by Peter Shih 2003 - does not match poster name Alexf (talk) 10:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The browser is not licensed under the CC-BY, nor is the Google search page. wL <speak·creatively> 09:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not really in the scope. Eleassar (t/p) 09:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr says: "This photo was taken on August 30, 2012 in Shaanxi, CN."

Another website seems to have had the image since February 2012, though: http://www.sxhkxy.com/html/2012-02/7297.html

Potential Flickrwashing. Stefan4 (talk) 17:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF clearly shows (c) by Peter Shih 2003 - does not match poster's name Alexf (talk) 10:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Alexf I have no idea why the meta data is showing the name "Peter Shin" but the truth is those picture are really been clicked by me you can visit these links for more details http://atultiwariphotography.allyou.net, http//shutterpunch.deviantart.com, http://atultiwariphotography.daportfolio.com,http://atultiwariphotography.weebly.com,http://atultiwariphotography.webs.com.,you can also find some of my photography on National Geographic Magazine website's. I think that enough to prove that it is my work. (Vtatultiwari)


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality penis. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality selfie. Please SALT the filename. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Krd 06:40, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Krd 06:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Alan (talk) 04:16, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 21:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

'bad quality', no 'educational use', and not in use, i.e. imho "out of scope", Roland 01:47, 19 May 2013 (UTC) Roland 01:47, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Grade Terre tunisienne O5.png Adnen1985 (talk) 14:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{Speedy}} please. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image looks a lot like a screenshot from TV & the contributor seems to have a history of uploading the work of others without permission Nil Einne (talk) 18:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same photo in better quality and higher resolution at http://www.flickr.com/photos/27639553@N05/2989223556/in/photostream/, where it is said to be from 1934. PD-70 seems hardly valid. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Brocken file and unused. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free drawing from 1969 (per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia). Eleassar (t/p) 10:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

album cover Mjrmtg (talk) 11:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Delete it! --/abbedabbtalk 20:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free map from 1945. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 09:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also:
--Eleassar (t/p) 09:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful "own work" Mjrmtg (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://secure.flickr.com/photos/94046063@N04/8587496487 says: "This photo was taken on March 25, 2013."

http://www.bijie.gov.cn/Html/bjyw/153324683.html says: "发布时间:2013-1-4 15:32:13"

This seems to be Flickrwashing. Stefan4 (talk) 18:02, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image. Misidentified, not Haitian empress but a poorly cropped version Queen Emma of Hawaii and Prince Lunalilo from an engraving by Henri Theophile Hildibrand. -KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:LL: http://www.lbx777.com/z_ql/s1x/qlsx073.htm Stefan4 (talk) 19:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality image - low resolution and pixelated. Was once the only freely licenced image of this person but now File:Matt_Neal,_Donington_Park,_Apr_2012.jpg and File:Matt_Neal_Donington_Park_May_2009.jpg are both available and used in articles in place of this image. Techtri (talk) 10:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, upload was only edit to wikipedia and it clearly shows border/shading as taken from a web page. MilborneOne (talk) 17:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So you found the source. Good for you. Looks like I can change my vote. ----DanTD (talk) 17:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The background image appears to be used elsewhere, such as http://s49.radikal.ru/i124/1008/68/2f83810eac7b.jpg. If this is a legitimate use of the background image, then as a derived work the sourcing would need to be clear and the source licence(s) open to verification. Additionally, this graphic is likely to be out of scope as I find it hard to think of the educational re-uses this might have. (talk) 13:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This animation contains images (drawings of birds etc.) of unknown copyright status. Eleassar (t/p) 08:58, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader as it appears to be a standard cat publicity/sales image, original source not found but larger versions can be found like http://r1.cygnuspub.com/files/cygnus/image/OOH/2010/SEP/600x400/c18_a0039_10170828.jpg MilborneOne (talk) 16:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyright violation, self advertising by user Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OpenLayers is BSD, but where did the map data come from? –⁠moogsi (talk) 13:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 23:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Animation containing drawings and paintings of unknown copyright status. Eleassar (t/p) 09:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also:
--Eleassar (t/p) 09:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painted by hand (not the best quality), and can be replaced by e.g. this. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the best quality, can be replaced, e.g. by this. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:35, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a newspaper scan, but certainly not like the uploader's won work from 2013 as claimed. Rosenzweig τ 14:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. Disparaging file name. Probable WP:BLP violation by user blocked in en:Wiki for adding slanderous material with one of the two noms. Poeticbent talk 07:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Date and author for this image are not given, so we are unable to determine its copyright status. It should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 19:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The animation contains photos of buildings (e.g. church in Odranci etc.) from Prekmurje that were deleted in previous DRs (per COM:FOP#Slovenia). Eleassar (t/p) 09:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be Flickrwashing from http://tieba.baidu.com/p/1333162472

Note that Flickr says 2013 while Baidu says 2011. Stefan4 (talk) 18:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Moldova, see COM:FOP#Moldova Gikü (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:SkilletRisePhoto.jpg and both are copyright violations Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable band - no encyclopedic value High Contrast (talk) 21:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable "own work" and appears to be copyright vio. Doubtful that members of South Korean boy band SS501, posed for uploader to produce photoshoot/professional quality works. A google search of 'SS501 Persona Tour' shows that the clothing style is consistent and would require restricted access during the tour to capture such image. If not would like to see original EXIF data of images with details of when, where etc photos were taken. Michaela den (talk) 14:44, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The poster here fails COM:DM, making this photo a derivative work. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted the first version in the history PierreSelim (talk) 06:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crap during batchuploading, no EV (maybe violate personal rights too) Slick (talk) 14:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF ze-dan (talk) 06:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF ze-dan (talk) 06:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF ze-dan (talk) 06:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyright violation, no permission stated Aloneinthewild (talk) 15:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that this nice portrait is actually the work of its subject. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and unused. Yikrazuul (talk) 11:13, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to less quality, no EV Slick (talk) 15:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, but as the bot operator, please use {{Speedy}} instead. Amitie 10g (talk) 19:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to less quality, no EV Slick (talk) 15:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:49, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cute, but out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:08, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:25, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubt own work, looks more like c&p from a website Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be Flickrwashing from http://10.crec4.com/content-357-43-1.html and note that the date in the URL to the file on the Chinese website predates the Flickr date of photography. Stefan4 (talk) 18:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:LL: http://220.249.97.103/news_content.jsp?id=201211281721570136&classid=20&typeid=3&upid=20 Stefan4 (talk) 19:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be Flickrwashing from http://www.fheb-xm.com/zaijiangongcheng/2011/1214/1543.html Stefan4 (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Focus of the image was a copyrighted user interface. Eleassar (t/p) 08:56, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: no media file, no allowable PDF content. Rosenzweig τ 21:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:LL: http://www.10yan.com/html/zt/60znxc/lxy/094833568.html Stefan4 (talk) 19:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{PD-RU-exempt}} cannot be used for this image High Contrast (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extreme distortion. Probably out of project scope. A.Savin 09:04, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 21:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Dlvo

[edit]

All pictures are drawn by hand and presents not the best quality. Nothing we donna have already in better quality. Afaik unsued. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete all of them. Hand drawn image are not useful when high quality chemical structure images are trivial to create (out of COM:SCOPE). There are several errors in chemical structures with them too. Ed (Edgar181) 12:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 7emenoff (talk · contribs)

[edit]

{{PD-RU-exempt}} cannot be used for this image. Among those nominated files are additionally some which are of false authorship claim or simply copyright violations

High Contrast (talk) 19:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • What I need to do to correct license? and Why {{PD-RU-exempt}} is inccorect template?
I fear that these images cannot be kept on Commons. Commons is a free media host which means that many images cannot appear here (without special permissions). --High Contrast (talk) 14:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I'll try to find the right licenses and find information about the original sources.7emenoff (talk) 07:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amy Gigsy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anciensbalzaciens (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Those files are obviously not the uploader's own work from 2013 as claimed, so the licenses are not valid. They should either be given proper descriptions, authors, dates, permissions or rationales why they are in the public domain (if applicable), or else they should get deleted.

Rosenzweig τ 21:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bru216 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The Flickr account Geomeng (94046063@N04) mainly seems to be used for Flickrwashing, so I'm not sure if it would be wise to keep these images.

Example deletion requests:
List of files to delete:

Stefan4 (talk) 18:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete them all. I regret I passed some of them. This uploader has a flickr, panoramio and picasa account too. Three accounts is way too much. The image from his picasa account was used to upload a laundered image in this DR taken from a web site. Also there is this DR --Leoboudv (talk) 18:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Under the list of files to delete, I see a Sony, Canon, Nikon camera metadata...and even a Xiaomi camera? How many cameras does this uploader have. This tells me that this uploader must be taking other people's images and uploading them here. If it was only 2 cameras, it might be OK as people upgrade to a better camera but four? --Leoboudv (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Likely Flickrwashing. I added one image to the list that is inside this scope as well. Lymantria (talk) 07:51, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bru216 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files from Panoramio user "Bru216" appear to be licence washing. Also, as these files were uploaded by Commons user "Bru216", it doesn't seem unlikely that this is the user's own account and that files uploaded as "own work" also are copyright violations. Lots of camera models were used and at least one image has a watermark from a website.

Example deletion requests:
List of files to delete:

Stefan4 (talk) 19:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: So the image output (low and high quality images) and camera models used is not consistent: In 2012, he used a Nikon, Olympus and Canon camera all in the same year? And in 2006, he used a Nikon camera, but in 2007, he used a Sony camera...and in 2008, a Canon camera. Why so many different camera models. From the other DRs of his images this suggests to me that he is taking other people's images and uploading them as his own on his flickr and panoramio accounts. They should be blacklisted and this uploader should be sanctioned or banned. On my userpage, I clearly say, I have only 2 cameras. If I have a third, I will say it. It seems Bru216 now has 4 cameras at least. Now 5 cameras, I forgot the Xiaomi camera here. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another thing I noticed (checking only the ones with geographical coordinates on the file information page) is that the files were taken at very different locations in China. Some in the north-east, some in the south, some more central. A small number of images were taken outside China (some from South Korea, one from the UK with website watermark, one from Italy and one from the United States). Most people live in one city and work in either the same city or a nearby city, so most people would mainly take photos from more or less the same small geographical area (say, within 50 or 100 km from your home), whereas there would be much fewer images from other locations (for example taken during holiday trips or visits to your friends or relatives), but this user's images don't seem follow that pattern. They seem to be more evenly spread out on all parts of China. There could of course be a reason for a more even distribution of the images (for example if you work as a lorry driver or as a pilot), but it's not the way a person's image contributions usually are distributed. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Yikes! You're right. The UK image even says the copyright owner is 'www.quanjing.com', not the Bru216 and its in Britain, not China or South Korea. This uploader is just taking images randomly from the web and placing it on his panoramio account. Someone has to act or Commons could get sued. I hope an Admin will act tomorrow. This case gets worse and worse. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carrie Wong Hui Suan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carrie Wong Hui Suan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File #2 is a copyv from http://k.mengxiang.org/index.php?edition-view-263259-3.html#section, #3 is from http://www.todaynews.com.tw/bencandy.php?fid-11-id-4341-page-1.htm. All copyvios, Commons:Image casebook#Internet images. --Martin H. (talk) 20:32, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daaniii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Internet images uploaded without a license (or dubious claims of authorship). Delete as copyright violations.

Senator2029 19:13, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamal.kakbra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I very much doubt that the uploader was authorized to put this logo under GFDL and CC licenses.

Rosenzweig τ 22:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omsarkar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Palangana1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two images of an unknown dog. What purpose are they supposed to serve?

Rosenzweig τ 21:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rihanna xxl-18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not uploader's "own work", likely copyright violations. Files lack descriptions and categories. Test uploads from a new user.

Senator2029 11:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shesaiso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A bunch of personal images which are not in use. Out of project scope.

Rosenzweig τ 21:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shivute ya christof (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, big green frame makes the first image useless anyway.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tracyfab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like collection of promo/fan photos, not own work.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vicentecastro07 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely that these images are actually uploader's own work: small size, no Exif, another upload by this user was a clear copyvio.

Rosenzweig τ 22:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, lots of previous uploads of this user were copyvios. --Rosenzweig τ 22:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vivek.amity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by XenonN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam, unusable for educational purposes due to watermark with email.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YLesnikov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope, all unused (file YA.jpg not in use on ruwiki)

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Youpping Spain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

spam, out of scope

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kobe Matsuri 2010 Parade

[edit]

Main subject of image are copyrighted mascots, and Most of screen are recent artworks. No COM:FOP#Japan.

--Vantey (talk) 03:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Max Camis artworks

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:Sapcal22. Max Camis (1890-1985) is not in public domain. --82.120.160.205 14:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos uploaded by Kubast12

[edit]

Recently I found evidences that all other photos uploaded by this user as "own work" were actually taken from other websites. Also many of his uploads were deleted in the past as copyvios.[2] These two left, we can see that there is no EXIF metadata on both files which may indicate that the were taken from some facebook profiles like many other copyvio photos uploaded by him. --Oleola (talk) 01:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho that flickr-transer is a violation of privacy & personality rights of children / individuals not in public life respectively the parents/responsibles would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, please also see face of the men photographed, Roland 01:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho that flickr-transer is a violation of privacy & personality rights of children / individuals not in public life respectively the parents/responsibles would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, please also see face of the men photographed, Roland 01:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted by request of the artist. 414mqk (talk) 01:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eliminar fotografia a pedido do artista. Silviahidalgo (talk) 02:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted by request of Antonio Alonso Martinez RichardDavidCohen (talk) 02:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. Disparaging file name. Questionable WP:BLP use in en:Wiki. Poeticbent talk 03:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the file is not disparaging. Both persons in the photo affectionately call each other Piglet in Polish. Polish Piglets is their Pet name as part of the way they live their extra marital relationship. The photo has no copyright and its author posted it freely online for any use as long as it is not commercial. Nothing posted about these individuals is defaming unless the mention of a real and active Interpol investigation against them qualifies as "defaming". The persons in this photo have been under an open Interpol investigation since 2009 as suspected employees of a Human trafficking investigation. Before you disparage free speech, you should pull the Interpol report on Przemek Ristok and Beata Dabrowska and think again.

There is nothing defaming in mentioning facts. The couple call each other Piglet. They are Polish and they are being investigated by the Interpol. The file nam PolishPiglets was chosen only because Piglets waas already in use on wikimedia. If you want to change or have the file upload differently then please state so. Any questions?


Deleted: already deleted Lupo 08:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Del Aor is born in 1950. Copyright violation. 82.124.47.142 12:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Aloneinthewild (talk) 16:02, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, scanned caot of arms Aloneinthewild (talk) 16:05, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dont want to this pic Arslan malik2255 (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dont want to this pic Arslan malik2255 (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 08:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The book cover is a copyrighted work and Commons:De minimis does not apply in this case. Ileana n (talk) 15:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is the photo of the author of a book, with the book in his hands. It is a portrait of the author! And, by the way, he is also the owner of the copyright of the book. It looks that you defend him against himself. The defence of this minor part of the photo (the cover of the book) does not apply in this case. User:gabibis1796

The book cover is a copyrighted work (yes, by the same person on the photo, en:Carlos Núñez Cortés of en:Les Luthiers), an needs an OTRS ticket. The image was uploaded only to illustrate the article of the book in the Spanish Wikipedia so the intention is clearly to submit the book cover, which is just as important as the person in the photo. That's why de minimis does not apply, it can't be cropped.--Ileana n (talk) 23:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment An OTRS ticket was sent (#2013052010008939) and it is being analyzed. I recommend waiting until resolution before taking a decision. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: On hold pending OTRS, per Banfield Alan (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Overberg as Speedy (löschen) and the most recent rationale was: URV--Overberg (talk) 13:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Converted to DR as no evidence for the claimed copyvio (=URV in German) provided. As the image is in use, nominator is asked to provide evidence for the copyvio-claim, either on-wiki or privately per email to OTRS (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org). -- Túrelio (talk) 13:43, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete. The uploader has now expressedly stated that these are not his photos[3]. Even though I still have doubts whether this isn't merely resulting from a quarrel on :de, I think we need to comply with his request. Anyway, neither Wikipedia nor Commons will suffer much from the deletion as the images can easily be re-shot by anybody on holiday in this region. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed my vote after what happened today (abusive mass-speedy-tagging by Overberg and shown to be SP of Sendker). --Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deutsch: Nach der ausdrücklichen Aussage des Uploaders "Die Photos gehören nicht mir, ich versichere die URV," sehe ich keine Möglichkeit dem Löschverlangen nicht zu entsprechen, selbst wenn ich persönlich immer noch nicht von der Angabe überzeugt bin. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glane.JPG and Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Sendker. Overberg has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts.
Watzmann Talk 20:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A lower-resolution version of this photo had been uploaded in 2006 by User:Sendker (master-account of SP Overberg) as File:Glane04.jpg, who had requested its deletion in 2012 (without a valid speedy-rationale), which had been performed nevertheless, but now reverted by me. This image version is still in use at academic.ru. Thereby, the author-entry should be changed to Sendker and  Keep. --Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FASTILY 23:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea. Lymantria (talk) 07:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is something like {{Useful-object-US}} applicable in S. Korea?--Elvey (talk) 00:33, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No idea. However, photos of buildings are not OK, as seen in the UV House case. Also, the Flickr account seems to have been used exclusively for Flickrwashing, so the FOP issue is less important here. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, the Flickr-account turned out to be a Flickrwashing account, we noticed this after my DR above, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bru216. Lymantria (talk) 11:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 23:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Overberg as Speedy (löschen) and the most recent rationale was: URV--Overberg (talk) 13:26, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Converted to DR as no evidence for the claimed copyvio (=URV in German) provided. As the image is in use, nominator is asked to provide evidence for the copyvio-claim, either on-wiki or privately per email to OTRS (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org). -- Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


delete. The uploader has now expressedly stated that these are not his photos[4]. Even though I still have doubts whether this isn't merely resulting from a quarrel on :de, I think we need to comply with his request. Anyway, neither Wikipedia nor Commons will suffer much from the deletion as the images can easily be re-shot by anybody on holiday in this region. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed my vote after what happened today (abusive mass-speedy-tagging by Overberg and shown to be SP of Sendker). --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deutsch: Nach der ausdrücklichen Aussage des Uploaders "Die Photos gehören nicht mir, ich versichere die URV," sehe ich keine Möglichkeit dem Löschverlangen nicht zu entsprechen, selbst wenn ich persönlich immer noch nicht von der Angabe überzeugt bin. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glane.JPG and Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Sendker. Overberg has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts.
Watzmann Talk 20:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A lower-resolution version of this photo had been uploaded in 2006 by User:Sendker (master-account for SP Overberg) as File:Glane02.jpg, which he had deleted (without valid speedy-rationale) on May 13, 2012; image is still in use on academic.ru. Thereby, author-entry should be changed to Sendker and  Keep. --Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: FASTILY 23:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's a ector graphic called Tencent Logo.svg. Someone's Moving Castle (talk) 04:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 23:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Overberg as Speedy (löschen) and the most recent rationale was: URV--Overberg (talk) 13:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Converted to DR as no evidence for the claimed copyvio (=URV in German) provided. As the image is in use, nominator is asked to provide evidence for the copyvio-claim, either on-wiki or privately per email to OTRS (permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org). -- Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The uploader has now expressedly stated that these are not his photos[5]. Even though I still have doubts whether this isn't merely resulting from a quarrel on :de, I think we need to comply with his request. Anyway, neither Wikipedia nor Commons will suffer much from the deletion as the images can easily be re-shot by anybody on holiday in this region. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed my vote after what happened today (abusive mass-speedy-tagging by Overberg and shown to be SP of Sendker). --Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deutsch: Nach der ausdrücklichen Aussage des Uploaders "Die Photos gehören nicht mir, ich versichere die URV," sehe ich keine Möglichkeit dem Löschverlangen nicht zu entsprechen, selbst wenn ich persönlich immer noch nicht von der Angabe überzeugt bin. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glane.JPG and Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Sendker. Overberg has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts.
Watzmann Talk 20:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FASTILY 23:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mattpbarry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hilton College Jazz Band.jpg, File:Singing Hilton school song.jpg and File:Hilton MHS 1.jpg are all taken off the Hilton College website and I have recently gotten the correct permissions. However I did take File:IMG 0713 (Medium).JPG using my iPhone and File:Hilton paddler at Mission.JPG using my DSLR and re-sized both to be the same height (768px). Mattpbarry (talk) 18:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 2 kept, rest deleted as copyvios FASTILY 23:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mattpbarry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos/patterns, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   16:47, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG at File:Pohyblivý most (cz).svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:20, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 23:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was not PD on URAA date. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 19:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This file is in public domain since 1999. No reason for deletion at all. See the concept of "convenient forum" in Deror Avi's lecture "A common answer to Commons problem" presented at Wikimania 2012.Oyoyoy (talk) 12:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I went through the whole thing and that was a suggestion not an actual policy. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 12:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a suggestion, nor Deror Avi's invention. I suggest that you read some of the vast legal literature on "convenient forum" and realize that Israeli copyright law is supreme in this case (a picture taken and published in Israel). Oyoyoy (talk) 19:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Licensing#Interaction_of_United_States_copyright_law_and_non-US_copyright_law and the section immediately below that. I'm saying that it is arguing for a change in Commons policy. Also, if an admin has to delete this image, almost all of the images on your userpage would have to be too. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 21:15, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: apparently still copyrighted FASTILY 23:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho that flickr-transer is a violation of privacy & personality rights of children / individuals not in public life respectively the parents/responsibles would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, please also see image description, Roland 01:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC) Roland 01:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 03:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho that flickr-transer is a violation of privacy & personality rights of children / individuals not in public life respectively the parents/responsibles would not have been asked for permission to upload as Common Share-Alike, please also see image description, Roland 01:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC) Roland 01:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


Deleted: FASTILY 03:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly likely not the uploader's own work -- false license claims High Contrast (talk) 23:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I wasn't sure how to list whose work it was, but have just modified it to say "author unknown". The photo was given to me by Eisenberg's family so it could be added to the Wikipedia page about him. They don't know who took the photo; he, his wife and his children are all dead. The only photo I previously had showed him in profile. The photo was taken in the 1940s; Eisenberg died in 1964. I scanned the photo from a print; no one knows where the negative is and the photographer is likely dead. Marrante (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as an author, would he not be considered a public figure? I believe this photo was used for publicity and may have been used when he made a speaking tour across the US in the 1950s. I was given a second photo of him taken in 1958 of him at his desk in his library, as well. Marrante (talk) 23:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have now added the PD-heir license, which I should have done at the outset. I hope this solves the problem. Marrante (talk) 10:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The CC-license is still given. --High Contrast (talk) 17:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, thanks. Forgot to remove it, but I have done that now. Marrante (talk) 19:46, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see at all why {{PD-heir}} should apply. The photographer is not known, so how could we know that the photographer's heirs have placed his in the public domain?? It might be PD due to having been published in the U.S. without copyright notice, or copyright not renewed, but PD-heir is clearly bogus. Lupo 09:07, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not the photographer's heirs, it's Eisenberg's heirs, which I guess I did not make clear. They regard the photo to be their property, and I assumed it was, which is why I chose PD-heir. If PD-heir is no good, what would you recommend using? Marrante (talk) 13:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If you are the uploader, contact COM:OTRS FASTILY 03:36, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for the PD-status of this image. The source is insufficient High Contrast (talk) 21:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image 4. Kelly (talk) 21:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You must add this info to the file page. --High Contrast (talk) 21:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FASTILY 23:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]