Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/03/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 2nd, 2013
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krishnagovindwagle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 00:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 00:24, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oswi202 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted artwork from an H manga.

moogsi (blah) 00:49, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by INeverCry Morning (talk) 05:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User's own artwork, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 00:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 00:56, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joseph.monserrath (talk · contribs)

[edit]

2 pictures of user, outside project scope, and a screenshot from an unspecified game.

moogsi (blah) 00:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 01:00, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 01:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:13, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 01:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, questionably within scope. moogsi (blah) 01:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Jespinos (talk) 01:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Me equivoqu{e al subirlo Yesvari85 (talk) 02:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Me equivoque al subirla Yesvari85 (talk) 01:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Magister Mathematicae Morning (talk) 05:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 01:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. This image was posted to Wow Turkey on 9 September 2007 by Erkan Tosun. There is no proof of {{Own}} of the original uploader Varmıcaycen. Takabeg (talk) 01:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did some following up, and I am afraid that you are correct. Delete it. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 07:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oriiiana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 01:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted per nomination ALE! ¿…? 14:42, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vicmqzp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshot of an IM conversation, outside scope.

moogsi (blah) 01:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 01:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pretty awful user artwork with no educational value. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect a copyvio. Web res, uploader with several copyvios, no metadata. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:10, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Jim Derby (talk) 02:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It claims as "own work" but looks like it is scanned from a book. It may be a copyvio. Wcam (talk) 02:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It claims as "own work" but looks like it is scanned from a book. It may be a copyvio. Wcam (talk) 02:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a TV station logo from the U.K. It is probably over the threshold of originality for that country, and is probably not the uploader's property to release under license. I have taken a copy for fair use on en.wiki. Diannaa (talk) 02:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a logo of a company, and the uploader is likely not the copyright holder. I have taken a copy for fair use on en.wiki. Diannaa (talk) 02:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled down duplicate of File:David Iro.jpg. Froztbyte (talk) 04:00, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope Morning (talk) 04:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A Greek license applying to the symbol of a former Portuguese territory? Sounds questionable to me. Also no use, with another more accurate rendition available.. Fry1989 eh? 04:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Herck.Ajw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image, out of scope

Morning (talk) 04:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled down duplicate of File:Suzanne Belperron Archives Olivier Baroin.jpg. Froztbyte (talk) 04:12, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no OTRS permission JuTa 19:32, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per OTRS ticket 2013052210013205 - Jcb (talk) 00:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by K0434123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image, out of scope

Morning (talk) 05:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prmotional image, out of scope Morning (talk) 05:19, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower quality version of File:The Reception.JPG Morning (talk) 05:27, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader cannot manage it. Robert961000 (talk) 07:24, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Morning (talk) 13:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader cannot manage it. Robert961000 (talk) 07:24, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Morning (talk) 13:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader cannot manage it. Robert961000 (talk) 07:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Morning (talk) 13:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader cannot manage it. Robert961000 (talk) 07:28, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Morning (talk) 13:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are several inaccurate parts in this image. Robert961000 (talk) 06:17, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader cannot manage it. Robert961000 (talk) 07:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Morning (talk) 10:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader can't manage this file. Robert961000 (talk) 00:51, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:U.S. Army Flag Patch.png

There are several inaccurate parts in this image. Robert961000 (talk) 06:16, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted --Ezarateesteban 11:07, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:U.S. Army Flag Patch.png

The uploader cannot manage it. Robert961000 (talk) 07:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 22:48, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader cannot manage it. Robert961000 (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Morning (talk) 10:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader can't handle in this image. Robert961000 (talk) 00:42, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader cannot manage it. Robert961000 (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, unused, out of COM:PS. Funfood 07:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 15:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader cannot manage it. Robert961000 (talk) 08:00, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Morning (talk) 10:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Semenov.m7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspicious uploads, probably copyright violations: there are newspaper/bookcover scans, Soviet archive photos declared as self-made, low-resolution photos taken with different cameras. All needs further clarification on author(s) and license, or should be deleted.

A.Savin 08:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Semenov.m7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photograph of 3d object without photographer permission

Dogad75 (talk) 15:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aherrera94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. All today as copyvio identified uploads had their origins on copyrighted sites related to "Defesa Civil de Chile" (files mostly grabbed from Flickr and Picasa, so these remaining ones can't be believed (per COM:PRP) either.

Gunnex (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I've nuked all this user's uploads as manywere obvious copyvios and the remainder were dubious at best. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no encyclopedic value 188.104.119.16 09:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 09:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:08, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:10, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:12, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:13, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:24, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:27, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Technical request, to assist an user who doesn't seem to understand how to request a picture deletion. This picture depicts an actor. An user, Francoise2628 indicates the photo subject is opposed to the picture publication. The user didn't give proof of a mandate, but the circumstantial evidence seem enough to consider it's the case at's this initial debate stage. Dereckson (talk) 10:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Morning (talk) 10:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is no private photo album 188.104.119.16 10:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising Funfood 11:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 15:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Museo memoria chile (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It is unlikely that the museum holds the copyright to this archive material, especially the posters. Author is specified as "Desconocido", which is Spanish for "unknown", making it even less likely that these are legit.

Vera (talk) 11:46, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(in spanish, excuse me...) Estas fotografías fueron subidas en el marco del proyecto GLAMWIKI entre el [de la Memoria] y Wikimedia Chile. El museo recibiò como donaciones la mayor parte de las imàgenes. Cuando había dudas o existía alguna condición de los autores, se solicitaba expresamente el consentimiento. En caso que algún autor pudiera arrepentirse de su donaciòn o hubiese una confusión en la licencia que habría autorizado, se debe ver cada caso en particular. Los wikipedistas que subimos estas fotos lo hicimos bajo el nombre de usuario "Museo de la memoria" para evitar situaciones de malos entendidos.
En el caso de los posters y panfletos se dió el siguiente problema: Si bien la institución "dueña" donó la obra al Museo de la Memoria, estas instituciones descritas o que aparecen como firmantes de los posters, NO SIEMPRE fueron quienes diseñaron, imprimieron, o financiaron la imagen, ya que muchos grupos o "colectivos" clandestinos eran independientes durante la dictadura militar, entonces "firmaban" según sus preferencias (o apoyando a la institución que organizaba un evento o proyecto) y no siempre había una militancia o relación clara con las instituciones que aparecían firmantes. Estos grupos buscaban el anonimato (por razones obvias) y tampoco eran estables en el tiempo. La búsqueda de autorías se hizo compleja y se optó por publicar todo lo recibido en donación y enfrentar cualquier posible reclamo en el entendido que:
  • permitiría estudiar y conocer el periodo oscuro y sin referencias como fue la lucha clandestina al régimen militar
  • El presunto autor debería probar su autoría. Se debe aclarar que posiblemente muchos fueron asesinados por el ´regimen o hayan ya muerto sin que sus posibles herederos supieran de su participación en la obra.
  • En caso de error se re-etiquetaría o solicitaría el borrado si era necesario.
Se estimó que las personas que realizaron estas imàgenes ya las estaban donando o licenciando, desde el momento que estaban hechas anónimamente para ser puestas clandestinamente en la vía pùblica y que si bien nuestro deseo y voluntas es hacer un profundo reconocimiento como autor, es a veces imposible determinar quién realmente la realizó. Cuaquier reclamo de autoría debe dirigirse al Museo de la Memoria y Derechos Humanos en Santiago de Chile quien manifiesta poseer los derechos de las obras que le fueron donadas.
--Ciberprofe (talk) 21:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So, if I understand the Google Translate correctly, the author is unknown, because of the thread of living under a dictatorship. But unless there is an orphaned works clause in chilean copyright law, I don't think these works can be published on Commons. --Vera (talk) 12:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Almost all works in Chile, including most government works, are under copyright if they were published after September 16, 1962. That includes anonymous works. While the copyright may be longer (70 years pma) if the author is known, that it is irrelevant here, because these are from the Pinochet era, which began about ten years after 1962. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation of per. rights of a teenager, del on DE Nolispanmo 11:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PRP: Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Dura-Ace (talk) 11:56, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: very small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 12:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: Uploaded in 01.2013 by User:鉄道キング (= "King railway") vs http://tetudoukazuki.blog.so-net.ne.jp/archive/20120123 (2012) = http://tetudoukazuki.c.blog.so-net.ne.jp/_images/blog/_ae6/tetudoukazuki/E4BC8AE4B887E9878CGOE38080EFBC91.JPG (2012, identical res & exif). Gunnex (talk) 12:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from [1], which is copyrighted Yangfl (talk) 12:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by 1Veertje Morning (talk) 10:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no description. Yann (talk) 12:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 12:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 12:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Immagine non necessaria Docfra (talk) 20:10, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Varese, villa Toeplitz.JPG

not interesting 151.48.178.68 19:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Not a reason to delete --moogsi·(blah) 22:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I see that the uploader themself has originally tried to delete this. No reason was given then, either --moogsi·(blah) 22:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 16:28, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not interesting 151.48.223.26 12:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:37, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and also

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF, user with history of copyvios. Yann (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality, per COM:PORN. moogsi (blah) 13:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong format. please convert to jpg. McZusatz (talk) 13:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Someone else needs to fix this or just go ahead and delete it - This was a jpg when I uploaded it. It was converted automatically to webm format by the upload wizard, I have no idea how to circumvent the auto-type detection of Wikimedia Commons when it fails to function correctly. Refer to Commons:Village pump/Archive/2013/02#Odd file type 'correction'. I feel I have spent too much time on this technical problem already, which is a pity as I was going to help a bit more with the Canadian uploads collection from the British Library that this is a part of (and I organized the funding for), however I have just moved on to other things instead. Thanks -- (talk) 13:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I took a snap of the movie file: File:Vlcsnap-2013-03-02-14h34m34s0.jpg. Could you please rename the file properly. --McZusatz (talk) 13:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done now we can  Delete this file. -- (talk) 13:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: ok, thx McZusatz (talk) 13:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: very small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 13:27, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect, replaced by File:(–)-Aflatoxin G1 Structural Formula V.2.svg. Leyo 13:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No-brainer, yup. Why don't people just upload corrections over their own original? DMacks (talk) 15:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Leyo: Delete. / Hallo DMacks: Relax. Regards, --Jue (talk) 14:14, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't mean that to sound harsh, just musing out loud about something that seemed unusual to me. Thanks for your contributions! DMacks (talk) 17:23, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thats okay, thanks for your encouragement. Best regards, --134.106.214.75 12:45, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 14:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a classic case of Flickrwashing. One possible source of this political cartoon is here. The Flickr account is simply a collection of Syria-related images from various sources. For example, this Reuters image, currently marked as CC-by-2.0. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader requested deletion of an unused file, due to the likelihood that the flickr account was not the author of the image and therefore the image at flickr was a copyright violation. -- Cirt (talk) 14:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Utkarshsingh.1992 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The source's permission statement is that its material may be "reproduced free of charge in any format or media". This is too vague for our purposes as, for example, it does not specify whether or not derivatives are allowed (required by COM:L). In the absence of an OTRS ticket, COM:PRP compels deletion.

Эlcobbola talk 14:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More files uploaded by Utkarshsingh.1992 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious authorship claims; relatively low resolution and one lacking EXIF data. Uploaded in a batch of copyvios, including blatant false authorship claims (e.g. File:NIT Rkl Olympic Standard Swimming Pool.jpg taken from Picasa; File:Institute Entrance Gate.jpg, etc.) See uploader talk page.

Эlcobbola talk 14:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be in the public domain in Denmark, but there may be problems with the copyright status in the United States. The image comes from the website "hammel-billeder.dk", and the website contains a request from people to send photos of Hammel to the website. There is thus reason to believe that a lot of the photos on that website are private unpublished photos. For Danish photos from 1960 which are below the Danish threshold of originality, there are two different scenarios:

  • Published before 1 March 1989: In the public domain in Denmark because the copyright term has expired. Usually in the public domain in the United States (but see Commons:Subsisting copyright).
  • Not published before 1 March 1989: In the public domain in Denmark because the copyright term has expired. Not in the public domain in the United States. See {{PD-US-unpublished}}, which applies to all unpublished photos regardless of the source country.

As you can see, we can only keep this photo if it can be established that it was published before 1 March 1989. Unfortunately, http://www.hammel-billeder.dk/hammel/sygehus/syg1.html doesn't list any source for any of the images. Stefan4 (talk) 14:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep - Given the very lax definition of published (as far as I know, Commons doesn't have policy on the scope of published and I do not believe that it has to fall under the US view on this) in Denmark, my perception is that this falls under "Published without compliance with US formalities, and in the public domain in its source country as of URAA date" and thus is {{PD-1996}}. As such this debate will actually have repercussions, affecting a lot of the {{PD-Denmark50}} photos so I wonder if this shouldn't be taken as a more principal discussion, i.e. by inviting people who have previously discussed {{PD-Denmark50}} issues and/or do a mass-deletion for all affected photos and/or taking it on Commons:Village pump/Copyright? In kind regards, heb [T C E] 08:00, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • The problem is that {{PD-1996}} requires that the photo was published somewhere (using the USA definition of publication I assume) without a copyright notice before 1 March 1989, or without a copyright renewal before 1 January 1964, and no such publication has been identified. Indeed, the statement at http://www.hammel-billeder.dk/efterlysninger.html suggests that a lot of the photos on that web site are private photos which have been hiding in private photo albums for decades and at most shown to relatives and friends. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:33, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • And I guess this is the root of our different perceptions of this issue: You assume it's the USA definition of publication, whereas I assume it's the local one. I have not been able to find anything pointing towards either perception though and Commons (/Wikimedia) doesn't seem to have taken a stance/debate on the issue :(. So what's next? --heb [T C E] 09:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • Note that Danish law defines two different levels of publication (same as in many other EU countries): "Et værk anses for offentliggjort, når det lovligt er gjort tilgængeligt for almenheden." and "Et værk anses for udgivet, når eksemplarer af værket med ophavsmandens samtykke er bragt i handelen eller på anden måde spredt blandt almenheden." If you visit the Little Mermaid statue in Copenhagen, you will often find vendors selling miniatures of the statue, so I assume that the Little Mermaid statue is "udgivet" because "eksemplarer af værket er bragt i handelen". Now walk some 100 metres south of the statue and you will find a different statue showing an angel standing on a big column. I have never heard of anyone selling or distributing copies of it in that way (there's just one copy which has to be inspected at the place where it is permanently located), so I would guess that this is not "udgivet". On the other hand, both statues "er gjort tilgængeligt for almenheden" because anyone can take a look at them by simply visiting Copenhagen. If you are saying that we should use the Danish definition of publication, then which level of publication should we use? Also, was this photo either "udgivet" or "gjort tilgængeligt for almenheden" before 1989? --Stefan4 (talk) 11:39, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Our rules are clear -- it is up to those who advocate keeping an image to prove beyond a significant doubt that the image is free. Since Stefan has, correctly in my view, raised a significant doubt about whether this image was published (within the US meaning of the word, as it is US law we must satisfy), then it must be deleted until better proof is found that it was actually published before 1989. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. This image is the derivative work of a copyrighted image that was used in www.islamweb.net (© 1998-2013Islamweb.netجميع الحقوق محفوظة) on 21 February 2008. Takabeg (talk) 14:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This ist a non-free logo. I'm quiet sure there is no possible legal license on the Commons Wikimedia page therefor. I was not aware of, when uploading some monthes ago, because I still was a Newby. So it should be uploaded elsewhere in a lokal Wikipedia upload space and deleted here. -Cachsten (talk) 14:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD text logo .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 15:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 15:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Finland for sculptures. This one by Eila Hiltunen (1922-2003) is protected until beginning of 2074 Htm (talk) 15:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. No FOP in Finland for sculptures. This one by Eila Hiltunen (1922-2003) is protected until beginning of 2074 Htm (talk) 15:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. No FOP in Finland for sculptures. This one by Eila Hiltunen (1922-2003) is protected until beginning of 2074 Htm (talk) 15:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. No FOP in Finland for sculptures. This one by Eila Hiltunen (1922-2003) is protected until beginning of 2074 Htm (talk) 15:28, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, single upload from user, out of COM:PS. Funfood 15:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 15:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haitone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already 23 warning templates on uploader´s talk page. Now 62. After today identifying around 40 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different panoramio- & picasa-accounts, photo-hoster, portals, blogs etc., mostly files from the same sites which were already deleted in 2011) it´s difficult to believe that the remaining files are really - as declared - own work. Nearly all uploads are related to the Spanish municipality es:Herrera del Duque. Presuming that the digicams "DV" + "DSC" are his own (and uploads with these digicams are always uploaded with +3000px. Btw, strange behaviour considering the other doubtful low-res images), I did not activated the related uploads in this DR. But the rest is unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, mostly missing EXIF, except

Resuming: IMHO untrusted user who uploaded a bunch of copyrighted material with the consequence that the remaining rest can't be believed either.

Gunnex (talk) 15:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 16:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF has a different name than the uploader, permission needed. Yann (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gajendrachaudharyup (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/file storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: different camera for almost every photo.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image offends my feelings and undermines the integrity of my country -Muffi (talk) 16:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Provocative soapboxing, no apparent educational use --moogsi (blah) 20:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The correct response when something offends you on the Internet is to not look at it. Sinnamon (talk) 03:12, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. No encyclopaedic content. This is just a political cartoon created by its uploader. I call upon the user Sinnamon to revise his vote. --glossologist (talk) 04:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, political cartoon is not a reason for deletion, it's just a description of a type of expression. -- Cirt (talk) 04:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Closing comment Being offended is not a valid reason for deletion. Wiki is not censored. There is educational content as it shows Russia without borders. PumpkinSky talk 12:18, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Being offended is not a valid reason for deletion. Wiki is not censored. There is educational content as it shows Russia without borders. PumpkinSky talk 12:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the same graphic is used by military non-russian, fascist groups in my country which attack, and persecute russian people Muffi (talk) 20:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason for deletion given. Sinnamon (talk) 05:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment My vote to delete last time was not based on the image being offensive, it was rather that the uploader was using Commons to promote their own particular political agenda with their own images. That this is an image the nominator recognises is all the more reason to keep it, unfortunately. There is something on Commons to offend pretty much every ethnicity on the planet --moogsi (blah) 11:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
you bad :( --Muffi (talk) 12:32, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Kept. No additional reasons for deletion were given; this is just one of many political files on Commons, and its usage by anyone is not a valid reason for deletion. odder (talk) 11:13, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope image. Hasn't been used since upload. Also not correct information. Turnless (talk) 19:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV capture with channel watermark. I doubt the movie/serie/... free licensed. Marked as own work. I am convinced that violates copyright. Alan Lorenzo (talk) 16:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 16:49, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 16:49, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 16:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, no EXIF. Yann (talk) 16:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mossiplayer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Media related to Tamer Hosny (press photos, promo shots, album covers), which seem to be copyrighted. Picture of the oil well is available elsewhere, doubtfully own work.

moogsi (blah) 17:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work: small size, many copies on the Internet. Yann (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a WWE match video. Invalid license. —Bill william comptonTalk 17:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by INeverCry Morning (talk) 10:07, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think that it has any foreseeable use in the encyclopedia. —Bill william comptonTalk 17:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of the uploader. Out of project scope. —Bill william comptonTalk 17:46, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot of some video. Thus, likely to be a copyvio. —Bill william comptonTalk 18:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, useless, no encyclopedic value, just a test, etc Frédéric (talk) 18:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused, have larger raster and also vector at Category:Cyclobutadiene DMacks (talk) 02:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopaedic file, probably taken from Internet (like). —Bill william comptonTalk 18:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kmslash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused images of an apparently non-notable band.

Jespinos (talk) 18:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arana2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 18:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 15:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndreJornet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 18:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

quiero eliminarla por cuestinoes personales Producciones Ashley and Cyber Tiltepec (talk) 18:12, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SergyMoneyHoney (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused self-promotional files.

Jespinos (talk) 18:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either copyvio or out of scope. Jespinos (talk) 18:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Simonemonster (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have many better images of kitesurfers. Jonund (talk) 18:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication why it's in scope. Jonund (talk) 18:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elizabethnaranjo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, text contributions.

Jespinos (talk) 18:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, PNG format. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 18:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either copyvio or out of scope. Jespinos (talk) 18:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 15:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have many better images of kitesurfers. Jonund (talk) 18:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw the nomination. I forgot that it is automatically in scope when it is used on Wikivoyage. --Jonund (talk) 13:24, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:52, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have many better images of yachts. Jonund (talk) 18:44, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw the nomination. I forgot that it is automatically in scope when it is used on Wikivoyage. --Jonund (talk) 13:28, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:52, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roman1903 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 18:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 18:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, small picture, unused and unuseful. Sort of self-promotion in description Broc (talk) 18:51, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Jespinos (talk) 18:52, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by J10452M (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Several of the files covered by the supposed consent declaration approved by our OTRS volunteers as ticket:2012022410006566 have been deleted as copyright violations, which naturally calls its validity into question in relation to all the files supposedly covered. See Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Arabic volunteer needed, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Israeli Jet Over Mount Sannine.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syrian Gazelle.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syrian MIGs flying over Zahle.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syrian Military Helicopter.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syrian SAM Sites In The Bekaa Valley.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syrian Tank Around Zahle.jpg.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion, no information on the image Broc (talk) 19:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The summary provided is incorrect. The author is claimed to be Jeff Gerstmann, but Gerstmann is the subject of the photo. The date is also wrong. The source information is lacking, but it seems to be http://www.giantbomb.com/images/1300-517237/, uploaded in August 2008. The image appears in news stories from 2007, which means it predates the link cited as the source.

It appears that the uploader just took this image from the Jeff Gerstmann page on Giant Bomb and uploaded it to Commons with a fake license. Reach Out to the Truth (talk) 19:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bedfordfallstown (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios or out of project scope images.

Jespinos (talk) 19:24, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ruehl7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 19:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blackfoger1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 19:28, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Object hardly visible. Jonund (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw the nomination. I forgot that it is automatically in scope when it is used on Wikivoyage. --Jonund (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Morning (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the watermark suggests, the image is likely not own work. Jespinos (talk) 19:33, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image's description suggests the uploader is fan of the person photographed. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 19:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, GIF format. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 19:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, outside project scope. moogsi (blah) 19:52, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GIF format for a photograph, history of copyvios. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 19:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, only text contribution. Jespinos (talk) 19:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alfred Ruckelo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuachin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 20:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 20:12, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arianit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of scale models. See User:Elcobbola/Models, particularly this section for full explanation. Brief examples: The official U.S. Copyright Office visual arts registration form (Form VA) includes "scale model" as a category. Gay Toys, Inc. v. Buddy L Corp., 703 F.2d 970 (6th Cir. 1983) found "Other than the portrayal of a real airplane, a toy airplane, like a painting, has no intrinsic utilitarian function" (i.e. these are not useful articles).

Эlcobbola talk 20:13, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea about copyright law affecting photos of model airplanes. I would invite others who can prove otherwise to argue here. I took a photo of a physical object. Arguying the contrary will lead to ridiculous ends. --Arianit (talk) 20:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:01, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arianit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The Prime Minister Office - All rights reserved 2018

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All public websites in Kosovo do this unknowingly, that notice has not been updated since 2018 by the way. Please refer to Article 12 of the copyright law. This is a public website reporting on the public functions of the head of office, see here Template:PD-KosovoGov/en. The law overrides any notice placed there. --Arianit (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Arianit: I'm not sure "official material" is about photos but let's an Administrator decide. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Google Translation of the law referenced by the template (not much more specific):
Copyright does not include:
1.1. ideas, principles, guidelines, procedures, discoveries or mathematical concepts as such.
1.2. laws, bylaws and other regulations.
1.3. official materials and publications of parliamentary, governmental and organizational bodies
others performing public functions.
1.4. official translations of regulations and other official materials, as well as agreements
international and other instruments.
1.5. submissions and other acts in administrative or judicial proceedings.
1.6. official materials published for public information.
1.7. folk expressions.
1.8. daily news and various information that has the character of ordinary reporting
of the media.
BMacZero (🗩) 22:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-KosovoGov}} applies. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kishanh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nvdhingra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, unused personal images.

Jespinos (talk) 20:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 20:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 20:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for deleted vandalism article against this boy. Hiperfelix (talk) 20:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 20:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally in a long list of files with permission from a musesum, but the spefic copyright holde declined in this case Sphilbrick (talk) 22:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete respecting Russian copyright. Rodchenko died in 1956 --moogsi (blah) 23:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smittydidit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures from 1925-1927, so unlikely to be scans of own work. Author presumably unknown so we wouldn't be able to determine how long he/she has been dead

Vera (talk) 22:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Broc (talk) 22:52, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: no encyclopedic value and Commons is not a private photo album --High Contrast (talk) 23:11, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It includes artwork far from being trivial Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 20:18, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it includes work far from being trivial with detailed design and Ticketek copyrighted logos, and it's not the user "own work" (along with personal information). Please also consider http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:MDNAticketSTGO.jpg --Ileana n (talk) 23:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 23:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 23:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Waterway Cycle Poster.jpg. Froztbyte (talk) 23:27, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 23:28, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, only text contribution. Jespinos (talk) 23:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file as a larger and somewhat restored version of Commons' File:Edward S. Curtis Collection People 005.jpg. The restoration work was done by PrintCollection, an online poster source. When I found the original source image (a TIFF file located at loc.gov), I decided to do the restoration work myself, which I have recently uploaded for use at Wikimedia. This file is superior in restoration and in image size and is located at File:Inupiat Family from Noatak, Alaska, 1929, Edward S. Curtis (restored).jpg, causing this file to be redundant and inferior. Consider it an interim file that was tested on multiple articles (and was never removed or replaced). – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 23:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 23:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio G. Coronades | Do you have a question? 23:52, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 15:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.toulouseblog.fr/legal.html vip (talk) 23:52, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improbable claim of "own work": image of Miss Colombia 2012: no EXIF + previous copyvio uploads by same user + identical image available online[2] = COM:PRP Rrburke (talk) 23:54, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Obvious serial copyright violator is obvious. What does a guy have to do to get indefinitely blocked around here? LX (talk, contribs) 10:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have an SVG of the South Sudanese flag. Fry1989 eh? 23:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, the Flickr page from which the Edward Said image is taken provides only a no-commercial-use license The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

yepp, delete then. Seb az86556 (talk) 04:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed this and rather than deleting the entire image I removed the picture of Edward Said from the collage and re-uploaded a new version so there is no longer a reason to nominate this for deletion. Silvertrail (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still needs revdel Seb az86556 (talk) 04:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let an Administrator know. Silvertrail (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Montages are often problematic. I've hidden the Said image, but both the Queen Rania image and the Masri image are also NC. Also note that including Flickr images that are not on Commons is risky and probably should be forbidden, because the license on Flickr can be changed at any time, while if the image is uploaded here, the license is permanent. Finally, please note that none of the Commons images are properly attributed -- attribution is two clicks away from the montage. The best way to do it is to list out the images with a link to the file and the attribution name and license in each case. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim, thanks for your help so far, I looked into what you've said and it is indeed, the user who initially made must have done so when the licenses were different I think, since they change that is risky, yes. I have located a usable version of Queen Rania on the commons that I will link to the page rather than the Flickr someone linked to before. I will also remove Masri from the collage until a suitable picture can be found, I briefly looked but could find none right now. I instead added two new pictures into the collage, one of Edward Said, he was in there before so I looked for one of him, found on the commons, and also one of George Habash, a notable Palestinian I have heard of. I am not the best at photo manipulation, but I reordered the pictures so the dated are on top, I think the product is suitable now, let me know what you think! Silvertrail (talk) 18:17, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think its ok now -- I note that the Queen Rania image is now NC at its source, but we have confirmation at OTRS that it was CC when uploaded here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not terribly familiar with the procedures here, but wouldn't it be better, given the changes required, to upload it under another name (v2modified, or whatever?) It's only used on one page, so changing the link would be next to no work. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 22:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a rule, if an new image is uploaded that is different -- that will coexist with the old image -- then yes, it should have a new name. But where the new image is simply a correction -- whether that is color, tilt, minor crop, or fixing a copyvio -- then it is appropriate to use the old name since the old image will never be used. In fact, I will delete the old versions when I finish here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you remove the deletion nomination now that the image is fixed please Jim? Thanks! Silvertrail (talk) 17:42, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please do, that was a good five minutes to find it is all ok now. Penyulap 13:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work - The photographs are part of a memorial, but it is unclear if this is a permanent exhibition and in a public place (and therefore under COM:FOP) Vera (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  • Procedural keep. The uploader claims to be an official representative of the museum, and over at COM:AN it's been advised that the uploader be requested to provide proof via OTRS of being the museum representative. Without proof, the uploader should be blocked eventually, and in that case we can renominate this for deletion, since there won't be evidence of this being free under COM:FOP. However, if we get OTRS proof of this being an official representative, we should keep the image: the museum professionals will know the law, so we will be safe in trusting that this is a case of FOP (regardless of who owns copyright) and/or that it is a case in which the museum holds copyright and releases it under the cc-by license. Either way, it won't hurt to wait a little while until OTRS proof is provided or until lack of OTRS proof results in the account being blocked. Nyttend (talk) 05:25, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete We have three copyright issues here -- the main image itself, the copyrights on the various photographs shown in the main image, and the copyrights on the memorials shown in the photographs. Chilean FOP does not extend to photographs or to indoor works, so the memorials are PD only if they are all outdoors in public places. We know nothing of the status of the photographs of the individual memorials, except that they are not covered by FOP. We also have a named author who is not the uploader and no evidence of permission. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:52, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nagoya

[edit]

These are incorrect versions, due to the inexperience of the user. Only the latest version is used File:De-Nagoyav4-article.ogg --LordOider (talk) 12:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 01:42, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See w:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 February 13#File:Yahya Golmohammadi.jpg. Stefan4 (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 08:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]