Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/04/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![17 File:Uno, Biffe og " Baggårdens Bolcher" i Greve!.jpg](#File:Uno,_Biffe_og_"_Baggårdens_Bolcher"_i_Greve!.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
very likely copy vio Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 01:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Screenshot Chinese television shopping channel OCJ 77.184.58.107 07:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation Sreejith K (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
copyvio McZusatz (talk) 07:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation Sreejith K (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
this image no longer in use on any page, that page it was on has been updated with different images. DarkKomodo (talk) 16:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: 1) not a valid argument for deletion 2)diff=prev&oldid=70465126 (nominator has withdrawn) RE rillke questions? 17:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
this page was added to deletion requests in error by myself. Administrator: please remove from deletion requests.DarkKomodo (talk) 16:50, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: 1) not a valid argument for deletion 2)diff=prev&oldid=70465126 (nominator has withdrawn) RE rillke questions? 17:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright watermark in image. Sorry, I'm having to figure this out manually as the image itself is locked--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep: The copyright watermark is not relevant if the flickr account owner owns the rights to the image. In this case, the flickr account owner's name (Jonathan Rashad) and web site matches. Secondly, he has 849 images on his flickr account; I see that the other images have a Non-Commercial restriction but he licensed this single photo as "CC BY SA 2.0 Generic"--or freely. So, the flickr account owner likely knows what he is doing. Finally, Admin AFBorchert has just placed a message on this flickr account owner's online source (for this photo) notifying him (Jonathan) of the use of the image here. I see no problems keeping the image when the flickr account owner clearly licensed this single image freely. Most likely the uploader asked him for permission and he changed the license and removed the NC restriction. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)- Keep: This is a watermark that is in no contradiction to the free license granted by the photographer. Please remember that photographs that have been put under a free license such as {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} are still copyrighted and not in the public domain. Nothing else is stated by the watermark. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Comment and Request Yes, the reason only this image is licensed under CC-BY-SA-2.0 is because I asked him to change the license so it could be used on Wikipedia; I informed I would be putting it on the Main Page of the English Wikipedia, so he was surely aware of that. As the image is still on the Main Page of the English Wikipedia, I'd appreciate it if this is resolved quickly, so as not to give the impression we put up a non-free image. -- tariqabjotu 13:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- If Commons is okay with that, then I withdraw the nom. Learned something new.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Speedily kept as the nomination has been withdrawn and thanks to the clarifying statement by Tariqabjotu. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Exif says this photo is by REUTERS/Ognen Teofilovski. Tm (talk) 18:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
SVG at File:Bluetooth.svg Fry1989 eh? 21:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bluetoothpic.jpg: SVG file already exists. Mys 721tx (talk) 23:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- This is my user picture and is being used on another wiki here. Please don't delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noopur28 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 30. Apr. 2012 (UTC)
- What about the other picture File:Userpic1.jpg?
- Uploader there is Testicles. -- RE rillke questions? 11:52, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination this one, added category --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- What about the other picture File:Userpic1.jpg?
Kept: nomination withdrawn; used on http://wiki.wikimedia.in/City_and_Language_SIG_subcommittee_chair RE rillke questions? 11:53, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal photograph of uploader, out of project scope. —Bill william comptonTalk 06:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:47, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Автор фото и изображённая персона-одно лицо Dogad75 (talk) 19:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: The original description mentions clearly that it is a self-portrait. Unused, however, but u0ploaded to Wikipedia in 2006. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:49, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- Actually it is used in en:User:Aleksmot; dunno why global usage does not work properly in this case. --XXN, 16:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Guys, this photo is uploaded ages ago to be used on my Wiki profile pages in English and Russian wiki. I've changed the licence to simple CC-BY. What else should I do to keep it? I can confirm that it is my work. Aleksmot (talk) 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Aleksmot: Подтвердите, пожалуйста, в COM:OTRS или ru:ВП:ДОБРО, чтобы больше не было никаких сомнений и вопросов по поводу авторства. Уж больно маленькое разрешение... С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 06:50, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Выслал, спасибо за разъяснения. Aleksmot (talk) 21:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Aleksmot: Подтвердите, пожалуйста, в COM:OTRS или ru:ВП:ДОБРО, чтобы больше не было никаких сомнений и вопросов по поводу авторства. Уж больно маленькое разрешение... С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 06:50, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Pinging @Dogad75: . --XXN, 14:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Guys, this photo is uploaded ages ago to be used on my Wiki profile pages in English and Russian wiki. I've changed the licence to simple CC-BY. What else should I do to keep it? I can confirm that it is my work. Aleksmot (talk) 11:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Actually it is used in en:User:Aleksmot; dunno why global usage does not work properly in this case. --XXN, 16:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Разрешение в OTRS получено, Ticket#2017020510011578, подтверждено. Фото сделано со штатива на автоспуске. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 06:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Dogad75 - OTRS Ticket:2017020510011578. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
New name: File:Alexmot userpic.jpg. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Because I'm in regret by uploading this image Nathanael Everton (talk) 23:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Because i don't want this photo anymore in my account neither wiki Nathanael Everton (talk) 23:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
because i don't want this picture(uploaded by me) anymore in wiki Nathanael Everton (talk) 23:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Bad quality penis image, out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Denniss (talk) 12:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, no description Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Seems in scope to me, I added categories and noticed there are very few triangular windows in Commons and also very few inside views of German housing of that type. See also File:Unterkunft links.jpg nominated at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unterkunft links.jpg. -84user (talk) 04:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
QuestionHow do you know that the house is located in Germany? --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Because of it's usage in "Rügen März 2007" ( Keep). Multichill (talk) 08:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- QuestionWhere did you see that information? Doesn't much matter, I agree with you, non-square windows are not that common. But let's keep the two images since there are not too many good and interesting images of windows on Commons.
- I withdraw my nomination --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Because of it's usage in "Rügen März 2007" (
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, no description Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep As I wrote on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Unterkunft rechts.jpg, seems in scope to me. -84user (talk) 04:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Reason stated HERE --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:53, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 22:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
![00:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/04/30#c-Hedwig_in_Washington-2012-04-30T00:22:00.000Z-File:Uno,_Biffe_og_"_Baggårdens_Bolcher"_i_Greve!.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
![17:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/04/30#c-George_Chernilevsky-2012-05-07T17:44:00.000Z-File:Uno,_Biffe_og_"_Baggårdens_Bolcher"_i_Greve!.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Delete Chesdovi (talk) 16:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:40, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 00:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:47, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:49, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, too close to southpark cahracters imho copy vio Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:54, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
probably copy vio, looks like a webpage image Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, spam Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Totally blurry and low-resolution "image"; unusable. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Delete again. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:00, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted as abovve. Yann (talk) 08:27, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Delete oos. Chesdovi (talk) 16:01, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:26, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:26, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
no educational use Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:59, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, spam Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:39, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:42, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, can't see educational value Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:27, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal photo. Hystrix (talk) 08:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. Hystrix (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. Hystrix (talk) 08:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:54, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. Hystrix (talk) 08:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. Hystrix (talk) 08:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. Hystrix (talk) 08:50, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:56, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. Hystrix (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. Hystrix (talk) 08:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. Hystrix (talk) 08:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
no longer used and desired Luxusfrosch (talk) 08:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:58, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scopde, del. on DE Nolispanmo 09:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:58, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
unused personal image, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 13:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
unused personal image, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 13:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
unused personal image, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 13:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
This is a picture for deletion. Chesdovi (talk) 13:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
unused personal image, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 13:14, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:52, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Disputed image, replaced by File:Palytoxin.svg. Leyo 14:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, there's a ton of essential (to the (bio)chemistry) detail missing, and the image itself is pixelated even at full size. DMacks (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. George Chernilevsky talk 21:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Chesdovi (talk) 16:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Chesdovi (talk) 17:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
unused private img, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 17:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope image with no encyclopedic value for articles on either country. De728631 (talk) 17:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Get rid of it. Fry1989 eh? 20:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope image with no encyclopedic use for articles on either country. De728631 (talk) 17:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Get rid of it. Fry1989 eh? 20:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:54, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope image with no encyclopedic use. De728631 (talk) 17:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:54, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Leyo 18:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Delete Chesdovi (talk) 12:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
very low image quality. thus out of scope. Amada44 talk to me 19:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused, replaced, pixel copy of a SVG CoA version. (As can regonized in the slightly bumpy moon.) No spource given. -- Perhelion (talk) 09:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
unused, oos Chesdovi (talk) 16:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 16:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of his graduation rites. Chesdovi (talk) 16:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Another unused, poor graduation photo. Chesdovi (talk) 16:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
personal photo, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:07, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal image not in use on a user page. Out of project scope. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 06:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
image is oos. Chesdovi (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
unused oos image. Chesdovi (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal image, oos Chesdovi (talk) 16:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope Chesdovi (talk) 16:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused, out of scope. Chesdovi (talk) 16:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
unused peronal photo, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal image, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. If we knew which country this guy is from we could categorise it under Doctors from .... Chesdovi (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
personal img, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal image, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope. Chesdovi (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
promotional usage on es.wiki AlvarezGomez (talk) 19:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:24, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
unused personal photo. Chesdovi (talk) 16:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
unused personal photo. Chesdovi (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
unused personal photo. Chesdovi (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Chesdovi (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope. Chesdovi (talk) 16:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
persoanl snap. oos Chesdovi (talk) 16:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
unused personal snap. Chesdovi (talk) 16:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
upp, oos Chesdovi (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope Chesdovi (talk) 17:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:23, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
uneeded duplicated Chesdovi (talk) 17:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope anyway George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
unused, persoanl photo? Chesdovi (talk) 17:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
personal image, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
personal img, oos. Chesdovi (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
unused persoaNL IMG Chesdovi (talk) 17:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
DR filed as correction of a malplaced IP-request, likely from the original photographer, to delete this image[1]. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deletion_requests/File_talk:Cowgirl_Christine_with_horse.png&oldid=70471598){kind=link}
The original[2] rationale was:
- I am the owner of this image and DO NOT approve the use nor its context. Please remove Cowgirl Christine with horse.png from this site.
- if you have any questions, please email me at rjbejil@gmail.com
- Thank you, -Robert Bejil
- Delete - Not in use, easily replaceable. Flickr now set as ARR, I think this is a good faith request. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - Hard to believe this, but I concur with Mattbuck. - Thekohser (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - and Commons owes Robert an apology. --JN466 13:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Apology - for what? He himself uploaded it to Flickr under a CC license. --Túrelio (talk) 13:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- The image was uploaded to Commons by a contributor specialising in sexual material and given the name "SFW zoophilia illustration". I would have linked to the Wikipediocracy thread that explains this, but the site is still on the spam blacklist. See http://wikipediocracy dot com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=299 --JN466 18:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- But that's what CC licences allow - it's pretty much all good as long as you attribute. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:17, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Could you just confirm then that in your opinion there is nothing wrong with it if an educational charity like Wikimedia appropriates images from Flickr and offers them to the public retitled, with file names that imply the recognisable people depicted in them are sexual deviants? Or would you like to modify the statement you have just made? --JN466 02:48, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- You know, there's one thing I've always wondered about you WR types... given you clearly hate Commons, Wikimedia and all they stand for, why do you come here? Why not go off and edit the My Little Pony wiki, it would be more your speed. Unless you feel that the pinkness of one of them symbolises communism or something.
- To answer your question, no, I don't believe Wikimedia has done anything wrong here. Max Rebo Band probably needs a smack, but that's about it. Because yes, that is what CC licences mean - anyone can use them for any purpose, and that includes contexts you may disagree with. If you don't like the idea of people using your images for things - well, I was going to say don't put them under a CC licence, but I think the idea should be more don't put them on the internet. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:56, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- I like the idea of a collaborative project designed to make educational material freely available. I just don't like the joke that people like you have made out of it. Cheers, --JN466 01:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Could you just confirm then that in your opinion there is nothing wrong with it if an educational charity like Wikimedia appropriates images from Flickr and offers them to the public retitled, with file names that imply the recognisable people depicted in them are sexual deviants? Or would you like to modify the statement you have just made? --JN466 02:48, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- But that's what CC licences allow - it's pretty much all good as long as you attribute. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:17, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- The image was uploaded to Commons by a contributor specialising in sexual material and given the name "SFW zoophilia illustration". I would have linked to the Wikipediocracy thread that explains this, but the site is still on the spam blacklist. See http://wikipediocracy dot com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=299 --JN466 18:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Apology - for what? He himself uploaded it to Flickr under a CC license. --Túrelio (talk) 13:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Good faith deletion request from copyright holder. Unanimous delete opinion Alison ❤ 05:17, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Derivative Work. To keep this we would need permission from the copyright holder (AIS?) 99of9 (talk) 00:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: DW Lymantria (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
2006 painting by "unknown artist" cannot be "PD-Art" Infrogmation (talk) 15:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: updated info Lymantria (talk) 12:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Its against human emotions and that's why humanity. No one has right to utter a single word against any religion....if you dont like it dont follow it but pls dont make fun of any religion 83.110.250.192 12:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- This file has been previously deleted, and restored, see Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2010-08#File:Mohammed by meco.png. __meco (talk) 13:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No new reaons for deletion. russavia (talk) 07:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Not in scope; Commons doesn't exist for users to upload their own personal drawings. Pete F (talk) 18:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly in scope per previous Deletion Request. This drawing was made in the context of "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day" and this event even has its own Commons category and its own page in seven languages. Tm (talk) 18:49, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, agree with rationale provided by Tm (talk · contribs), above. More info on context and relevance of article apparent in its usage in seven (7) languages. -- Cirt (talk) 19:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused (!), so I don't know why people are thinking of this (on this page also not seen). In addition, bad personal painting are clearly not in scope (new reason for deletion). --Yikrazuul (talk) 09:36, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- Keep In scope per Tm. INeverCry 17:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
No consensus to delete -FASTILY 06:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
I read the previous discussions. Nothing in there convinces me that we should keep this offensive material from a user banned for child porno! If I had drawn such a pic for that user or anybody else, I would very possibly be blocked for personal attack and this is mass attack against any believer, irrespective of their religion. Let's keep the useful contributions of the banned user but also clean the dirt they left behind. Would you keep any child porn for "not censuring"? Please let's all / always be more sensitive on sensitive issues. Thanks. E4024 (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep In use in ru.wikinews article "Лента новостей 8 января 2015 года". Also Commons is not censored, this file was kept in 2 previous DR with the same ludicrous reasons. This drawing is in scope of "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day" and this event even has its own Commons category and its own page in eleven languages. Same arguments as the two previous deletion requests, and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Aisha follows the prophet.png. If some muslim users feel bad about this cartoon there is the option of not looking at them, instead of trying to censor it. Curiosly it seems that, even if they are offended, they seem to always find this category, even when the name of the category and file clearly says what this images are (drawings of Muhammad)
- Religious criticism is one of the tennents of free speach and democracy, like Piss Christ and this cartoon by Carlos Latuff about the Israeli occupation of Palestine and anti-semitism, depicting a stereotyped jew. Not hatred speech, like some seen on extreme religious channels be it Muslim, Christian, Jewish or Buddhist, where the "preacher" appeals to the faithfulls to kill, behead, burn, explode with the unfaithfull.
- Hate speech is not being able to be a christian in the Middle East because you can be killed for it, the same with muslims and christians in India, being rammed by a car on a mosque on france just for being a muslim, be stabbed for being a christian woman in Finland, etc. That is what is hate speech, to appeal to the physical destruction of others, not the depiction of Muhammad. Tm (talk) 13:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per the "relevant" comments of Jim at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Everybody Draw Mohammed Day - Aisha follows the prophet.png. --E4024 (talk) 13:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 09:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Omendruffi (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope, no educational value
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
no educational use.
- File:VARAcombat ~ Persain Martial Arts.jpg
- File:VARAcombat ~ Persian Short Sword & Leaf Dagger.jpg
- File:VARAcombat ~ Persian Long Spear.jpg
- File:VARAcombat ~ Persian Martial Arts.jpg
- File:VARA Combat.jpg
- File:ورزش رزمی آریایی ایران.jpg
- File:وآرا.jpg
- File:VARA COMBAT ARTS.jpg
- File:VARA ~ Persian Martial Arts.jpg
- File:Uruma-Te Shorinjiryu.jpg
- File:VARA Combat ~ Persian Martial Arts.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carballoyasoc (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:39, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Coolkille95 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:Viktor påve liten4.jpg
- File:Viktor påve liten3.jpg
- File:Viktor påve liten2.jpg
- File:Viktor påve liten.jpg
- File:Viktor påve 2.jpg
- File:Viktor är påve.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:14, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
out of scope
- File:Vulkano banner.jpg
- File:Vulkano tocando.png
- File:Vulkano grabando maqueta.jpg
- File:Vulkano en concerto.jpg
- File:Vulkanoaovivo.jpg
- File:Logotipo de Vulkano .jpg
- File:Logotipo Vulkano Grupo.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rakesh rockxy (talk · contribs)
[edit]nice presentation, here out of scope
- File:Warren buffet8.jpg
- File:Warren buffet7.jpg
- File:Warren buffet6.jpg
- File:Warren buffet5.jpg
- File:Warren buffet4.jpg
- File:Warren buffet3.jpg
- File:Warren buffet2.jpg
- File:Warren buffet1.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WASIF IMDAD (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:Wasif Imdad.ogg
- File:Wasif006.jpg
- File:Wasif005.jpg
- File:Wasif004.jpg
- File:Wasif003.jpg
- File:Wasif002.jpg
- File:Wasif001.jpg
- File:Wasif Imdad.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:08, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shariq r82 as Speedy (vandalism as per File talk:Bushra Ansari1.jpg#Rationale for Deletion) Sreejith K (talk) 07:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Converted this from speedy to normal DR since the file has OTRS permission. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- This file is an edited version of a photograph of Pakistani actress Bushra Ansari, taken at the Lux Style Awards 2007. This can be established by viewing the discussion at this page: http://vidpk.com/d/6/2002/%5BPG-18%5D-Bushra-Ansari-dress-Lux-Style-Awards-2007/. The original image is: http://www.paklinks.com/gsmedia/files/38879/UmarSayeed9.jpg. As you can see from this image and from the image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BushraAnsariLuxStyleAwards.jpg, that the lady is wearing a Sari and not a dress as in the file under discussion. In my view this edit falls under vandalism. --Shariq r82 (talk) 07:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Authenticity of Photo
This photo was uploaded after due permission from the Actress her self. In Oct 2011 Bushra was on the lux Style page and a number of fans had discussed nature of the very same photo with her. (http://www.facebook.com/#!/LuxStyleAwards/app_162712830512098). I have correspondence which I can forward to the relevant admin for confirmation (with Bushra Ansari herself). (This is in addition to correspondence for OTRS) - This does not prove anything since the link is from lux style awards 2011 and not lux style awards 2007 from which the original picture was lifted
On the official FB page of Bushra Ansari this photo from the same function has been posted http://www.facebook.com/#!/photo.php?fbid=289736107722090&set=a.278008008894900.80826.277671075595260&type=3&theater - This is a different picture
Discussion on the Vidpk page is biased and incorrect, since Youtube videos of the luxstyle event during that evening show that it was a cleavage fest which included almost all actresses along with Bushra Ansari.
Logically it establishes the conclusion that while Bushra Ansari had the sari palu covering the front most of the time, it inadvertently fell down when this particular snapshot was taken. Basheera Masih (talk) 20:02, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
I have sent an email to Ms Ansari about this issue, so that it could be settled once and for all. Basheera Masih (talk) 20:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Just got confirmation about authenticity of the photo, will forward to OTRS now. Basheera Masih (talk) 11:47, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Pointless reason for nomination. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 17:27, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Dubious Authenticity of the Photo
Basheera Masih, there is no evidence to support your argument that this photo shopped picture was authorized by the actress. Your argument is completely baseless and the links you have posted do not support your argument at all. The first link you posted proves nothing since it is from lux style awards 2011: http://www.facebook.com/#!/LuxStyleAwards/app_162712830512098. The picture in question was originally taken at the Lux Style Awards Malaysia in 2007. Here is the original picture posted on bushra ansari's facebook page:http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=117000378365929&set=o.140552222643969&type=3. The modified version found over the net and on wikipedia is a zoomed-in, cropped, badly photo-shopped version of the original. Also notice the badly doctored blouse and hair wisps that are falling on her left shoulder.
In another picture, Bushra's cleavage was slightly visible but that was a completely different picture that does not lend anything to your argument.
-Logically it establishes the conclusion that while Bushra Ansari had the sari palu covering the front most of the time, it inadvertently fell down when this particular snapshot was taken. Basheera Masih (talk) 20:02, 6 May 2012 (UTC) How can you "logically" establish something when the exact same picture can be seen without the cleavage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rizwanahmedkhan (talk • contribs) 23:05, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted Obviously a modified photograph. Comparing the original with this version, you can see the saree still on the blouse and also the Pallu seperately. The cleavage was added later. This is an attempt to defame the actress and Commons should not be used for that. --Sreejith K (talk) 18:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk page
[edit]
Rationale for Deletion
[edit]
This file is an edited version of a photograph of Pakistani actress Bushra Ansari, taken at the Lux Style Awards 2007. This can be established by viewing the discussion at this page: http://vidpk.com/d/6/2002/%5BPG-18%5D-Bushra-Ansari-dress-Lux-Style-Awards-2007/. The original image is: http://www.paklinks.com/gsmedia/files/38879/UmarSayeed9.jpg. As you can see from this image and from the image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BushraAnsariLuxStyleAwards.jpg, that the lady is wearing a Sari and not a dress as in the file under discussion.
I belive this to be defamation and therefore vandalism, making this file eligible for speedy deletion. Shariq r82 (talk) 21:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Authenticity of Bushra Ansari Photo
[edit]
This photo was uploaded after due permission from the Actress her self. In Oct 2011 Bushra was on the lux Style page and a number of fans had discussed nature of the very same photo with her. (http://www.facebook.com/#!/LuxStyleAwards/app_162712830512098). I have correspondence which I can forward to the relevant admin for confirmation (with Bushra Ansari herself). (This is in addition to correspondence for OTRS)
On the official FB page of Bushra Ansari this photo from the same function has been posted http://www.facebook.com/#!/photo.php?fbid=289736107722090&set=a.278008008894900.80826.277671075595260&type=3&theater . The same photo has been referred to by Shariq r82 above
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BushraAnsariLuxStyleAwards.jpg
Discussion on the Vidpk page is biased and incorrect, since Youtube videos of the luxstyle event during that evening show that it was a cleavage fest which included almost all actresses along with Bushra Ansari.
Logically it establishes the conclusion that while Bushra Ansari had the sari palu covering the front most of the time, it inadvertently fell down when this particular snapshot was taken. Basheera Masih (talk) 20:01, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
I have got all the facts confirmed and have forwarded the email to OTRS for confirmation.Basheera Masih (talk) 12:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Photo-shopped picture of an actress wrongly posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bushra_Ansari1.jpg
[edit]
I am trying to nominate a picture for deletion. It is located at the following link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bushra_Ansari1.jpg and has been (badly) photo-shopped for deletion. In addition, I would like to remove that picture from the Wikipedia entry of that actress. There is one user that is hell bent upon presenting baseless arguments and "proofs" that the picture is authentic and has been very proactive in preventing the picture from being deleted both from wikipedia and also from the Wikipedia page of that actress. Based on the page history of that actress, that user continually monitors it and reverts any changes where anyone removes the picture from the page. I personally don't have the sort of time that individual does, but i am computer science major and can vouch that the picture is photo-shopped. In addition here is some actual proof to my argument rather than claims made by the user (Basheera Masih is his name) -The actress attended the Lux Style awards in 2007, where the following picture was taken on the red carpet. The shirt in the picture is very low cut but there is no evidence of cleavage :http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=117000378365929&set=o.140552222643969&type=3. Recently, a modified version of this very picture was recently circulated over the net and via mass emails and that same version was added to Wikipedia.The doctored version found over the net and on wikipedia is zoomed-in, cropped, and badly photo-shopped version of the original. Also notice the badly doctored blouse and hair wisps that are falling on her left shoulder.
In another picture, Bushra's cleavage was slightly visible but that was a completely different picture that does not lend anything to the credibility of the photoshopped picture in question.
Any attempts to remove the picture from the actress's wikipedia page have been reverted by the user Basheera Masih, whose only proof is that the actress communicated to him that the picture is authentic. Bushra Ansari is Pakistan's busiest performers and does not have an official email address, her facebook page is also maintained by fans and isn't official. I request that this attempted spamming be taken seriously and the picture be removed from wikipedia.
As this is a professional photo shoot, we need that the photographer or the copyright owner sends an E-mail to COM:OTRS Teofilo (talk) 22:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
It is album art... Dogwalkerz (talk) 21:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Listed as fair use at en:File:Jay-Park-Take-A-Deeper-Look-Video-Teaser-Image.jpg. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:55, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The skyscraper is incidental to this photo russavia (talk) 01:43, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The prospekt is the subject of this photo. The building could be said to be incidental to the photo russavia (talk) 01:55, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
i dont need it Colejohnson66 (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- Keep "I don't need it" isn't a valid reason to delete any file on Wikimedia Commons. --Sdrtirs (talk) 13:10, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
the logo has been changed to Computer.svg. If you do keep it (which I object to), please move it to File:iSim logo.png. --Colejohnson66 (talk) 00:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
iPhoneEmu was never released and will not be Colejohnson66 (talk) 01:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. - {{Out of scope}} --Sreejith K (talk) 18:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:11, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: In use George Chernilevsky talk 18:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
User got blocked on hewiki and I strongly doubt own work on this image. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. The blocking plus lack of metadata convinces me it is not the user's work. Wizardman 19:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: questionable source, movie still or promotional image --Denniss (talk) 23:52, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted images in the file: The Viva Colombia's logo and the Wikipedia's logo. 190.25.108.49 17:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Possible license laundering, as this is a scan or something similar. Ralgis 15:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted per COM:DW, pattern indicates image scanned from printed magazine or book. -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:30, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Possible license laundering, as this is a scan or something similar. Ralgis 15:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted per COM:DW -- Infrogmation (talk) 12:31, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
The uploader of this logo wrote a link to this website. The website says that "The current logo of Steinway & Sons was inaugurated in 1955." The logo uploaded is the current logo of Steinway & Sons from 1955. Therefore, its first publication did not occur prior to 1 January 1923 and the logo is not in the public domain.
Furthermore, the uploader wrote that the source is his "Own work", which cannot be correct. Hereiamfriends (talk) 01:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: This is a slight variation of a logo which was first registered in the United States in 1876, the main difference from the 19th-century version being in the shape of the ampersand -- and the shape of an ampersand is not copyrightable under United States copyright law. And I assume the original uploader meant that the vectorization was his/her own work (it was certainly rather inefficient in the first-uploaded version of the file)... AnonMoos (talk) 06:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep: I agree with AnonMoos if his information is correct, as I expect it is.--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: I appreciate the comment and vote above by AnonMoos. However, I hope other users with experience in licenses and logos also would write comments. I am not sure about this logo. --Hereiamfriends (talk) 18:21, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
- Delete According to www.steinway.com: "© 2012 Steinway & Sons. Steinway and the Lyre are registered trademarks." --84.238.38.27 04:19, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- However, being a trademark is not actually grounds for deletion. We have several trademarked logos on Wikimedia Commons which were first published in the U.S. before 1923 (including Coca Cola and the NY Yankees). AnonMoos (talk) 14:20, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- Note: The original nominator has been banned for being a "Steinway-promoting sockpuppet"[3]... -- AnonMoos (talk) 10:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept, Proposer blocked/banned as COI of Steinway. I would assume this is a withdrawal. The only delete was invalid and seems COI as well. Canoe1967 (talk) 20:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, no description. no educational use Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 01:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, misuse of commons for band spam Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, probably copy vio anyway Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 02:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:34, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Coptvio, watermark from Chilean website En Portada ( currently out of service) http://www.mosquito.cl/www-enportada-cl/ Ileana n (talk) 03:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:12, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio, the author has already submitted a copyrighted picture of this Chilean celebrity from http://www.mosquito.cl/www-enportada-cl/ Ileana n (talk) 03:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Apparently from official website of the Spanish band Chambao http://www.chambao.es/es/home.php ( Noticias section) no evidence of valid licence Ileana n (talk) 04:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
copyvio Sonty (talk) 10:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
copyvio Sonty (talk) 10:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
copyvio Sonty (talk) 10:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
This crop may fail com:de minimis (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Austr.Aborig.png - flag on the right side is copyrighted) Bulwersator (talk) 11:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative of a modern sculpture (1960s or 1970s), no FoP in Ukraine, no FoP for sculptures in the U.S. where Commons is being hosted. Also, unclear copyright status since the image is available there [4] as well. A.Savin 11:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
copied from http://www.gik.gda.pl/upload/inwestycje/projekt_komunikacji/zdjecia/gpkm_szczegolowy.jpg Oruniak (talk) 14:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:37, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
I don’t see anything worth picking out in this photo... I don’t think there is any evidence that the vaguely spirally cloud shape is in fact a vortex. Ariadacapo (talk) 15:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
The author died in 1945, is copyrighted. Canaan (talk) 17:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
The author died in 1945, is copyrighted. Canaan (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
The author died in 1945, is copyrighted. Canaan (talk) 17:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
The author died in 1945, is copyrighted. Canaan (talk) 17:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:00, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work Common Good (talk) 18:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:17, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work Common Good (talk) 18:59, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work Common Good (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work Common Good (talk) 19:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work Common Good (talk) 19:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:28, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work Common Good (talk) 19:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:17, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work Common Good (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work Common Good (talk) 19:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
This picture appears as figure 1 in [5] where it is "adapted from Jerusalem et a. 1992". Jerusalem is not cited in the PDF. There is no clear provenance for this image, and it may have a copyright issue as a derivative work. - Glrx (talk) 19:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:22, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:03, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:03, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:03, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:03, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:03, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:14, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:45, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:56, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:54, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:48, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Comment: Since Russia has now freedom of panorama, this file should be undeleted. --84.61.179.113 13:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Identical to previously deleted file, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Hermes.png. Identiek aan eerder verwijderd bestand, zie Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Hermes.png. Pbech (talk) 22:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:58, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Has not been released under this license by the actual author, and probably does not meet the criteria for PD-text or PD-shap. Niet onder deze licentie vrijgegeven door de werkelijke auteur, en voldoet waarschijnlijk ook niet aan PD-text of PD-shape. Pbech (talk) 22:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:58, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
If, as the uploader claims, the author is Connexxion, then this is not a government publication, and this file should be deleted for the same reasons that a previous version was already deleted Pbech (talk) 11:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
I have speedily deleted this as this is just a new upload of an already deleted image. To my knowledge, no request for restoration has been put at COM:UDEL, no other community discussion has taken place, and nothing has been presented that puts the previous conclusion into doubt. If this is to be challanged, this has to go to COM:UDEL. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
This is not OK per COM:FOP#United States Teofilo (talk) 22:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
modern sculpture in Cleveland: This is not OK per COM:FOP#United States Teofilo (talk) 22:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Modern sculpture in Cleveland: this is not OK per COM:FOP#United States Teofilo (talk) 22:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Modern sculpture in Cleveland: this is not OK per COM:FOP#United States Teofilo (talk) 22:13, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:17, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
photo of a photo; no provenance given for original DS (talk) 22:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 11:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
really obviously looks like copyvio. At best, uploader scanned this in from a printed map. DS (talk) 22:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:19, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
really obviously looks like copyvio - at best, the uploader scanned this in from a printed map. Look at the other maps this user uploaded; they're all the same, and some of them are clearly cropped. DS (talk) 22:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 12:36, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
notice the big inverse semi-transparent letters in the upper right corner? Those are from the other side of the magazine page from which this image was scanned in. Copyvio. DS (talk) 23:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
de:Benutzer:Janis Witting, who uploaded this photo claimed to be the person in the photo and the author at the same time. [6] [7] That makes no sense. In the second link he asked the photo to be deleted.--88.77.184.166 08:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
no valid source given, authencity unclear. Jergen (talk) 10:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:25, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative of a modern sculpture (early 1970s), no FoP in Russia, no FoP for sculptures in the U.S. where Commons is being hosted. A.Savin 11:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Читаем -
Согласно четвёртой части Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации № 230-ФЗ от 18 декабря 2006 года:
Статья 1276. Свободное использование произведения, постоянно находящегося в месте, открытом для свободного посещения
Допускается без согласия автора или иного правообладателя и без выплаты вознаграждения воспроизведение, сообщение в эфир или по кабелю фотографического произведения, произведения архитектуры или произведения изобразительного искусства, которые постоянно находятся в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, за исключением случаев, когда изображение произведения таким способом является основным объектом этого воспроизведения, сообщения в эфир или по кабелю либо когда изображение произведения используется в коммерческих целях.
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:06, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- De minimis. --Amga (talk) 06:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Manténgase
[edit]
Por mí que se mantenga, no me parece mal que esta fotografía esté en Wikimedia Commons, además es un panorama, tendríamos que borrar todas las fotos de esos edificios. De minimis. -- 
George Miquilena (hablar) 21:46, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Denniss (talk) 00:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Derivative of a modern sculpture (1960s or 1970s), no FoP in Ukraine, no FoP for sculptures in the U.S. where Commons is being hosted. Also, unclear copyright status since the image is available there [8] as well. A.Savin 11:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Автор этой фотографии - я. Администрация лагеря (хозяева стеллы) против распространения в Википедии претензий не имеют. Reactor691 20:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
most likely no own work, wrong date (old photo) only contribution by this user Polarlys (talk) 11:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Polarlys. This picture has been given as a present personally to me by the poet husband so I scanned it for the Wikipedia. Let me know should you need any additional detailsUser talk:Chanter 21:57, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- Who took the photo? --Polarlys (talk) 21:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright belongs to unknown photographer, no permission. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation, screen capture. See [9] Supertoff (talk) 16:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Delete Chesdovi (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Given licence is invalid. Author of this picture is Leni Riefenstahl, who died in approximately 2002. No reason, why this picture is in public domain. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- I forgot to say: Leni Riefenstahl has never been "officer or employee of United States government". Taivo (talk) 17:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Belarus. 84.61.181.19 21:08, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- This my photo, is made by me. The photo of library is executed on the general plan, therefore no violations here are present. Moreover is a - photo of a fountain against library.--Gruszecki (talk) 06:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Infringes on the copyright belonging to the architect of the library. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:11, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- it seems to be copyvio - link says that video (including this photo) is 2 years old rubin16 (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
this has obviously been cropped from a larger image, for which no provenance has been given. DS (talk) 22:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete this should be speedy deleted as a much lower res version of File:Saanttt.JPG. --ELEKHHT 15:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio . HombreDHojalata.talk 23:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete http://sketchup.google.com--. HombreDHojalata.talk 23:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment La licencia de autor la tiene su propio autor, que autoriza su reproducción. En este caso Google no es la propietaria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.58.62.134 (talk • contribs)
- Español: Claro que la licencia la tiene el autor, pero, "autoriza su reproducción" no es una licencia válida. ¿En que se basa usted para lo que afirma? ¿Donde ha hecho constar el autor esa licencia que usted dice? --. HombreDHojalata.talk 20:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 14:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:FOP#Russia. 84.61.181.19 21:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Oppose This "rule" sucks.--Soul Train (talk) 19:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
I think the picture is ok.. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.33.33.5 (talk) 12:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
When sources are not deleted from commons, the file should not be removed. --Туча (talk) 17:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Worker and Kolkhoz Woman(3).JPG == the sculptor died in 1953, so the statue is still under copyright. Unless that DR closes as keep for some reason, this collage also must be deleted. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
There is a higher quality photo of this sign at "File:Warning signs for Iriomote cat.jpg" and is without the tourists - Purplepumpkins (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Kept - May well serve an educational purpose (e.g. to demonstrate typical tourist behaviour). Wutsje 06:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Test case. By my interpretation of laws relating to this, blurring the screen containing copyrighted content, despite consensus claiming otherwise, is producing an unauthorized derivative work of its non-free contents, still making it subject to these third-party rights. As such, I do not feel that this is a proper solution. It may be a proper solution for dealing with personality rights, but not this. ViperSnake151 (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I have no idea what copyright expertise or experience you have and hence no idea of what if any weight to give your 'interpretation', perhaps citing some copyright cases would help? From my non expert view, my interpretation is that the use of a blurred image, while obviously a 'derivative work', would be a 'de minimis' infringement. It is the same as having a photo of someone with an out of focus item (due to a narrow depth of field) in the background, or some small copyrighted item visible in the background of a street scene. --Tony Wills (talk) 10:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Guitar Wolf.ogg and Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2010-11#File:Guitar_Wolf.ogg. This is a video taken of a concert and you can barely hear more than a few notes over the screaming fans and what you can hear would not by itself qualify for copyright protection. However it was still ruled an illegal derivative work of the performance. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 11:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- This is a picture of a phone, and contains no audio! – Adrignola talk 12:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- The fact remains it's an illegal derivative work, and unlike the example I cited, you can still tell what it is. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 12:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- This is a picture of a phone, and contains no audio! – Adrignola talk 12:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- The case cited is of a performance work (I have no idea of what the video contained as it is deleted), I assume it shows the musicians on stage, performing (whether or not you can hear the music) - if the video was of the audience only, and a similar minimal amount of music could be heard I don't believe there would be a problem. Anyway not a good comparative example (neither is the bridgeman sampling case), how about something relating to image use rather than music/performance/film? --Tony Wills (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I think that for work B to be an illegal derivative of A, you need both work A and work B to pass the threshold of originality. The left screen is so dark that it is a rectangle with random looking shades of grey. The right screen contains an arrangement of very simple shapes: green squares, etc. So this would be at best a borderline case like Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Uno-cards.jpg. Teofilo (talk) 01:36, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep If "consensus [claims] otherwise", then the burden of proof is on the nominator to justify the position taken. If for some reason the de minimis argument put forward above does not hold weight in this discussion, then I expect the photo to have the screen blacked out, rather than deleted. Frankly, if one is interested in changing Commons' interpretation of copyright law, it should be discussed in a general forum and not through setting a supposed precedent via one particular file with limited visibility. – Adrignola talk 12:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Replace the so-called "derivative work" with a black screen. Just copy-paste the screen from the phone next to it. - M0rphzone (talk) 22:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
I admit I made a mistake when uploading this image.Hyju (talk) 00:43, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
As per the comments on my talk page, looks like the author's want deletion of this file. But isn't this {{PD-textlogo}}, making it too simple to be copyrighted? Sreejith K (talk) 11:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- I sent an email to site administrators, it includes this quote by {{PD-Textlogo}}.Hyju (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: PD text logo . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:59, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Autophotographer
[edit]
Files above are uploaded by User:Autophotographer whose other files are all copyvio. It means that files above must be copyvio.-TTTNIS (talk) 09:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- How about the OTRS-tickets for the latter two? Lymantria (talk) 12:10, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: first image deleted by jim others are kept because we have a valid OTRS ticket PierreSelim (talk) 13:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I think this is a non-free advertisement of LG Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 15:38, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- here is the LGEPR's profile:http://www.flickr.com/people/lge/ LGEPR is LG Electronic's flickr account. and this link is the evidence that this image is truly licenced cc-by licence by LG Electronics Puramyun31 (talk) 02:38, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, it's certainly LG Electronics's flickr account but the reason why I nominated for deletion is that this image may be a screenshot of a copyrighted advertisement--Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 03:55, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- why don't you ask http://blog.lge.com/2 about your doubt? did you think that LGEPR's licence is fake licence? I don't think that because this image is licenced by the original creator(LG Electronics) of the advertisement --Puramyun31 (talk) 04:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I think it is safe for us to assume that if a large company puts a CC-BY license on an image that they own the right to do so. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:01, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: per Jameslwoodward Courcelles (talk) 08:20, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I renominate this image for deletion. From the 1st nomination, the reason for keeping is that this image is licensed freely under LG's Flickr account. However, I have found that this is screenshot from music video Chocolate Love which is owned by S.M Entertainment so unfree Morning Sunshine (talk) 13:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I agree your claim, but please don't add LGEPR to blacklist. other images(such as File:F(x) SNSD LG Chocolate performance.jpg,File:F(x) Chocolate performance.jpg) are originally taken, not screencaptured from the music video. Puramyun31 (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
_SNSD_LG_Chocolate_performance.jpg){kind=link}
_Chocolate_performance.jpg){kind=link}
File was deleted.