Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/03/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Redundant new template that just complicates usage/translations. Currently, a simple "Done" template is being used in place of this. It is only used here. ~ Rehman 02:43, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete. It seems en:User:BrandonSkyPimenta has made Commons his new sandbox. —LX (talk, contribs) 06:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 06:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Movie screencap maybe? Suspicious certainly, low resolution, no metadata. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. "Source: None / Previously published: None"?? Riiight. http://www.e-novine.com/mobile/feljton/47487-Prosecution-Cane-hiding-submarine.html —LX (talk, contribs) 23:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 06:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Changed from copyvio. I tagged this as a copyvio yesterday because the image also appears here. On the talk page, the uploader claims to have some kind of permission, but it might only be for Wikipedia. For the uploader: if the permission mentions some free licence, please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS; if not, the image should be deleted. Stefan4 (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|Although I have been permitted by All About Symbian(AAS) to use this image on Wikipedia, this image cannot be used freely for any other purpose as required by Wikipedia. So this image should be deleted immediately.}}
Deleted: per uploader statement Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Classical case of spam. High Contrast (talk) 23:33, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Looks like a screencap to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Part of the GUI from the video player/TV tuner application can be seen at the bottom. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Deleted. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:48, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Uselessly small duplicate of File:Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg ~ Fry1989 eh? 02:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Nuke it -- there are images which are of good quality despite being small, but this isn't one of them... AnonMoos (talk) 03:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unused scaled down duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 18:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Uselessly small duplicate of File:Flag of Argentina.svg ~ Fry1989 eh? 04:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: unused scaled down duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
We have this flag in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 18:41, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 06:36, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
pic of unknown punk band Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete - per nom. - Takabeg (talk) 08:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Not educationally useful. I am the copyright holder and the original uploader, please delete. Koolabsol (talk) 08:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal picture. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
It has no license and no category Iliasgal (talk) 12:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:54, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Advertisement, out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 12:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
out of scope, formula's can be directly typeset in the relevant wikipedia article Crowsnest (talk) 14:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Not used bad quality image of non-notable person. Kobac (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
out of scope: tables can be directly typeset in the wikipedia article concerned Crowsnest (talk) 14:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
out of scope: formula's can be directly typeset in the wikipedia article concerned Crowsnest (talk) 14:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
out of scope: formula's can be directly typeset in the relevant wikipedia article Crowsnest (talk) 14:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Commercial content. ALE! ¿…? 15:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
This file isn't used in no page. and so, perhaps it isn't enciclopedic. Danielrengelm (talk) 17:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Description: "This file turned obsolete thus should be deleted" Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 20:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Product package Funfood ␌ 21:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Product package Funfood ␌ 21:19, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Classroom image, unknow location. Can't see any educational use Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 21:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused and unidentified diagram, out of COM:PS Funfood ␌ 21:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:37, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:37, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:37, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 23:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
unknwon person, no background information. small size (the image, LOL) and the quality is not good either. no educational use possible. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 23:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Border, lack of metadata and nonsense description make me suspect a copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Probable copyvio Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
This file have more than one author. Only for educacional purposes. Matteo Carcassi (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No license Lymantria (talk) 09:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Doubtfully own work, better quality here: [1] Funfood ␌ 00:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep, The image shown at http://www.datuopinion.com/florencia-cuba is linked to the higher resolution image uploaded by the same user here: File:Florencia - Cuba.JPG. --Captain-tucker (talk) 09:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC)- Delete Delete as unused, lower resolution duplicate of File:Florencia - Cuba.JPG. --Captain-tucker (talk) 09:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Florencia Valley.JPG: unused, lower resolution duplicate of File:Florencia - Cuba.JPG Mys 721tx (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
No FoP exception in Iran. Americophile 00:19, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Almas-mashhad.jpg : No FoP exception in Iran. Mys 721tx (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Bookcover scan with a picture by Lindroth died in 1988. No info on permission by the painter or his heirs provided. A.Savin 00:39, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Book.Pavlovsk Park.jpg: bookcover scan without permission from the author. Mys 721tx (talk) 00:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely photograph by uploader. There are print artefacts, supposedly a scan from a (copyrighted) book or magazine. A.Savin 00:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument in Chernivtsi.jpg: lacking proofs for own works. Mys 721tx (talk) 00:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely own photo by uploader. Low resolution, missing EXIF, and other dubious uploads amongst recent edits of the uploader. A.Savin 00:46, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Leningrad School 225.jpg: lacking proofs for own works. Mys 721tx (talk) 00:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely own work by uploader. Low resolution + missing EXIF. A.Savin 00:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Александр Шипков.jpg lacking proofs for own works. Mys 721tx (talk) 00:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely own by uploader, possibly taken from [2] without permission. A.Savin 00:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. per Commons:Deletion requests/File:M.Gize 2005.jpg : lacking proofs for own works. Mys 721tx (talk) 00:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- also:
- File:Khurram.Ansari.jpg
- File:Yousufi.jpg
- File:Parveen Shakir.jpg
- File:Jaun Elia.jpg
- File:Saleem Nasir.jpg
from serial copyvio uploader, unlikely to be own work. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. What do you think of File:Saleem Nasir.jpg ? Takabeg (talk) 09:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Better images are available, This image is difficult to rotate on a 30(0) angle & crop also will spoil, Thus it will not be usefull for an educational purpose ...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 16:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
This image is as unique as it is . you wont find another one of Three boats heads parallel to each other in periyar river. may be not today but eventually the worthiness of the picture will be realized for educational or other purpose. Rest is up to you ... :) Irvin calicut (talk) 18:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
--> Better image..As per the Uploader's comment..Its unique but need to have a presentation value for education.. --...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 10:01, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG)
.JPG){kind=link}
_(Clupea_pilchardus)._Desenho.jpg){kind=link}
._Desenho.jpg){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
._Drawing.jpg){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
._Desenho.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_(Clupea_pilchardus)._Desenho.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Clupea_pilchardus)._Desenho.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(Clupea_pilchardus)._Desenho.jpg){kind=link}
_(Clupea_pilchardus)._Desenho.jpg){kind=link}
._Desenho.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Desenho.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
._Desenho.jpg){kind=link}
._Desenho.jpg){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
._Drawing.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Drawing.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
._Drawing.jpg){kind=link}
._Drawing.jpg){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
.Desenho_de_Paulo_Cesar.JPG){kind=link}
._Desenho.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Desenho.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
._Desenho.jpg){kind=link}
._Desenho.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: I think it is an excellent image as is -- certainly we have tens of thousands of worse images. It both illustrates a particular type of indigineous boat and is pleasing in its own right. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
I mistakenly called it yellow spotted Eel, while it's a Myrichthys ocellatus (gold spotted Eel) Firedrop (talk) 17:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: A bad name is never a reason to delete. Please use {{Rename}}. Deleting and reloading under a different name simply wastes time and resources. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Rights of used photograph unclear Funfood ␌ 19:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Comic strip, doubtfully own work. Funfood ␌ 20:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Comic strip, doubtfully own work Funfood ␌ 20:42, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
(Blurry) photograph of product package. Funfood ␌ 20:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Deletion request due to a lack of notability. This image seems irrelevant in terms of encyclopedic coverage. Note that the related article was deleted from the French Wikipedia on December 23, 2011. Genium (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Product package Funfood ␌ 21:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Product package Funfood ␌ 21:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ms.backpacker
[edit]Private logo, joke? No educational use possible
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 23:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
No educational use possible, no description of people, location, anything.
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 23:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 11:02, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Highschool garage band, misuse of commons as webspace provider.
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 21:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.
- File:Tenis de mesa temuco 85.jpg
- File:Tenisdemesatemuco85.jpg
- File:Viejosterciostemuco1985.jpg
- File:Trodeo de tercera division.jpg
- File:Campeonatoregionaldefutboldechile.jpg
- File:Ita-ina.jpg
- File:Temucoserie98.JPG
- File:Copas de temuco.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mikhail Krug
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Russia. We can use these files in Russian Wikipedia only.
Kobac (talk) 13:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- What is there to discuss? Remove them all. They have moved me to the Russian Wikipedia. Thank you for your attentiveness, Kobac. --Stauffenberg (talk) 15:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguelangelvargascruz (talk · contribs)
[edit]SPAM throughout, eswiki thought so too
- File:Gae mavc grupoalianzaempresarial campanaspublicitarias.jpg
- File:Gae mavc grupoalianzaempresarial contadoresenmexico.jpg
- File:Gae mavc grupoalianzaempresarial consultoriadecalidad.jpg
- File:Certificadoiso90012008 espanol.jpg
- File:Certificadoiso90012008 ingles.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Source neither allows free distribution of this image nor it has rights on it. Screenshot, probably. —Bill william comptonTalk 01:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted photograph/artwork on a train. 153.107.97.154 02:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - our general consensus on these images is that they qualify for freedom of panorama on the grounds that trains are utilitarian objects. We had a DR about this a few years back, but can't find it immediately. -mattbuck (Talk) 03:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: The fact that a mural is painted on the side of a train does not make it any less a copyrighted mural. We delete murals in the USA even though they are painted on the side of buildings. These are not images of the train, in which de minimis might apply, but images of the murals. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:56, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Not public domain, Laurens van Kuik died in 1963 Gouwenaar (talk) 13:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
This is the wrong image of the object. Wrong address in the list of sights to photograph. On Monday, load the appropriate image Orawka villa. MGostek (talk) 08:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 22:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Unused, useless, low quality drawing created by unnotable person. Out of scope. Bulwersator (talk) 22:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
out of project scope, no EV George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Poor licensing. Unlikely PD-old + no infos on author. A.Savin 01:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: PD-Russia is no longer a valid licence. As there is no other info, COM:PRP applies russavia (talk) 04:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Yves Klein died in 1962. Not in public domain. Besides, this picture categoriezd as "Yves Klein" is a gross digital fake. 90.61.237.219 12:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - even a vermillion user may create his own blue monochromes. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Sould be kept. Not from Klein. Category should be removed.- Zil (d) 15:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- Made by Yves Klein or not, it is PD-ineligible, not sufficiently original to warrant copyright protection: COM:TO. --V.Riullop (talk) 21:10, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep as PD-ineligible. Copyright being based upon originality, it isn't well adapted to conceptual art. Here is a good example. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 23:21, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting ambivalent issue. Klein and others would say the idea to such a provocative (or boring) painting is original enough as it was the revolutionary Black Square of Kazimir Malevich from 1915. Klein simplified even that and this after decades. Thus, the question is justifiable if this is a really original creation. This issue is not only a juridical one but gives a dubious aspect to some schools of modern art. To avoid mistakes and troubles to keep this "blue monochrome" it may be marked as a "fake" anyway. Vietinghoff (talk) 04:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Obviously PD : Kept Kyro (talk) 07:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Because the autor of the original drawing is not happy whit that drawing and i dont ask for permission before to upload the img. I don´t ask for permission to the autor of the original drawing before to upload the img. Aurochs1 (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. JuTa 21:14, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
1937 work, unknown (?) author, not old enough for PD-old. A.Savin 00:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Old photo of a 2002 died person, missing EXIF, unlikely own by uploader. A.Savin 01:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
1954 photo... Unlikely taken by uploader... A.Savin 01:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Author claimed as unknown & photo as 1940 -> cannot yet be PD. A.Savin 01:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:09, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative of a modern sculpture by Lindroth who died in 1988. No FoP in Russia. Also, photograph is probably not taken by the uploader. A.Savin 01:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Raster image of plain-text table, could easily be done in wiki-source directly to improve accessibility, reuse in other contexts, and future edits for linkability, updated info, etc. Only use was in en:Bacterial cellulose, where it is now in wikimarkup source instead DMacks (talk) 03:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Crop of a likely copyrighted photo: http://www.jou.ufl.edu/pubs/communigator/index.php?id=41 Ytoyoda (talk) 03:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
a person of no notability Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:33, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
a person of no notability Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:29, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:33, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Organisation CCUSA doesn't seem to exist. Can't verify source, author, licence. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 03:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:28, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Ah! Not a fantasy club sorry!. do we keep 3b-league soccer clubs? I'll add categories just in case. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 04:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Given the history of uploaders images, probably copyvio, at least not own work (= no source) Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Description says it: Test upload Not in use on thwiki, global usage says otherwise. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
This is a sculpture by Alfred Courtens (1889-1967). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 06:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
This is a sculpture by Alfred Courtens (1889-1967). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 06:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of probably copyrighted object Bulwersator (talk) 07:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:28, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work of probably copyrighted object Bulwersator (talk) 07:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:28, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio. Possible Flickr laundering. We can see the letters "unity". This proves that the uploader tedi doychinova (This member is no longer active on Flickr.) taken this image from other place (website, leaflet etc.) Takabeg (talk) 07:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 08:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
This is a sculpture by Jean Roig (born in 1926 and probably still alive). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 08:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
The author died in 1942 so afaik the text is not in public domain until 2013 Plushy (talk) 10:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission, now own work. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for Georgia. This station was built in 1971 and renewed in 2006 [3] Materialscientist (talk) 11:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Its my photo. Incorrect gender information included. Will be replaced by correctly named file. ACCassidy (talk) 12:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Sculpture by living sculptor Tom Frantzen. There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 12:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Rather a holiday snap than useful to illustrate bavarian folk costumes as the main object of the picture obviously doesn´t wear a folk costume. Rudolph Buch (talk) 12:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Too small for any use Funfood ␌ 13:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:33, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
LontiWesterkamp can't be the author of this photo made in 1912, perhaps was the real author still alive after 1941 Gouwenaar (talk) 13:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:52, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Derivative of unfree derivative. Kobac (talk) 13:43, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Appears to be taken from http://frankiecorrado.blogspot.com/2009/12/frankie-corrado-scouting-report.html Ytoyoda (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:57, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Raster versione of the svg file Gigillo83 (talk) 16:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Incorrectly coded svg file. Immediate deletion requested by the uploader. 白拍子花子 (talk) 16:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:05, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Does not look like own work at all. Tekstman (talk) 17:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:40, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Question of own work. See Google and e.g. http://www.ainotrosell.se/press.html Only contribution of user, no exif data and strange user name Wouter (talk) 17:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:22, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Copyright. See http://kizlarvebabalari.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ali-ugur-ilesam-2000-ler-2.jpg or Google. That gives higher resolution than the one in Commons. Only contribution of user, no exif data Wouter (talk) 17:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Unused, and better represented via latex Hardwigg (talk) 19:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:41, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
unused user image, user has not been active since 2010, 2 edits globally. just a spam pic Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 19:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Taken from http://www2.leedeeradio.com/recommend/c_allstar-i_sing_acapella7/ Ileana n (talk) 19:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Suspected copyvio. No plausible own work. Tekstman (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
not own work, taken from website of 1st. presb. church. worng source + wrong license Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 21:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
I think that this might be eligible for copyright. Own work is extremely unlikely anyway. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Comic book cover, doubtfully free Funfood ␌ 21:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:20, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Really own work? If it's an official logo, seems unlikely the uploader holds copyright. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:29, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:58, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 21:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:28, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Text index ,out of COM:PS Funfood ␌ 22:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:02, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
I think a copyvio - uploader writes in Russian and first said pd-russian, but the person on the photography seems to be an USA biophysician who died in 1983 Traumrune (talk) 22:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 09:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
No evidence that this file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Bulwersator (talk) 22:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license is not metioned in source Bulwersator (talk) 22:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:18, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license is not metioned in source Bulwersator (talk) 22:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:19, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Lower quality version from File:Nguyen Minh Triet.jpg Funfood ␌ 23:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:00, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
and File:Mmadrid8400.jpg, File:Señalcoberturametro.jpg. Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 08:32, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Not mentioned in eswiki article about Moraleja. 3b league club Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 04:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for Georgia. This design is surely copyrightable, and the building was completed in 1975 (see image file or en.wiki). Materialscientist (talk) 11:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the criteria given at {{PD-Liberia}} lead me to believe that non-textual Liberian government works, such as coins, are not in the public domain until the time of copyright expires, and something produced in the 1990s definitely hasn't gotten to that point yet. Given the history of the country during the 1990s, I doubt that this is a government work in the first place; I'd guess that it's like Liberian stamps of the period, which were produced and sold to collectors by American firms rather than being produced for the Liberian government and sold/used thereby. Nyttend (talk) 12:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the criteria given at {{PD-Liberia}} lead me to believe that non-textual Liberian government works, such as coins, are not in the public domain until the time of copyright expires, and something produced in the 1990s definitely hasn't gotten to that point yet. Given the history of the country during the 1990s, I doubt that this is a government work in the first place; I'd guess that it's like Liberian stamps of the period, which were produced and sold to collectors by American firms rather than being produced for the Liberian government and sold/used thereby. Nyttend (talk) 12:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Tecladista versátil, dueto musical o grupo musical para eventos sociales y empresariales.pdf
[edit]
Advertisement, out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I tagged this as a copyvio because the image also appears on Facebook. Inamabidi (talk · contribs) removed the tag, referring to a post on the talk page by 86.98.89.157 (talk · contribs) that the IP owns a hard copy of the photo. The IP also refers to an unsourced previous discussion on Wikipedia. The information here doesn't prove that the IP user is the copyright holder of the image. Stefan4 (talk) 13:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:SDA Bocconi School of Management Building.jpg Rudolph Buch (talk) 18:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
OTRS ticket 2012013010005075 states that this photo was taken by Jody Nickerson who does not work for the Forest Service and during its upload to Flickr it was mistakenly given the CC-BY-SA license. This license was changed on Flickr to ARR which was the license that they intended to use, the Coconino National Forest request that the image be deleted from Commons. --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:43, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
I can't be sure whether the copyright was renewed or not, since there is no adequate information on the source. InverseHypercube 19:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Deletion request due to a lack of notability. This image seems irrelevant in terms of encyclopedic coverage. Note that the related article was deleted from the French Wikipedia on December 11, 2011. Genium (talk) 12:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:16, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Deletion request due to a lack of notability. This image seems irrelevant in terms of encyclopedic coverage. Note that the related article was deleted from the French Wikipedia on December 26, 2011. Genium (talk) 12:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Deletion request due to a lack of notability. This image seems irrelevant in terms of encyclopedic coverage. Note that the related article was deleted from the French Wikipedia on December 11, 2011. Genium (talk) 12:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Deletion request due to a lack of notability. This image seems irrelevant in terms of encyclopedic coverage. Note that the related article was deleted from the French Wikipedia on December 11, 2011. Genium (talk) 12:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Deletion request due to a lack of notability. This image seems irrelevant in terms of encyclopedic coverage. Note that the related article was deleted from the French Wikipedia on January 1st, 2012. Genium (talk) 12:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
This is a statue by John Cluysenaar (1899-1986). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 12:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely by uploader (low res. + missing EXIF + other copyvios uploaded). A.Savin 01:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Copyvio. See source of this photo: http://sovarc.ru/leningrad/kalininr/kalininkp/img_5380/ --Kaganer (talk) 19:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:24, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
No permission. Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- I have gone through this several times, i am the author and copyright holder of the image,, im not sure why this has been singled out for deletion
- What you should do is contact OTRS to show them you're the copyright holder. Ices2Csharp (talk) 15:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: nothing has been received at OTRS Denniss (talk) 18:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Photo taken in 1950. Hardly by uploader and may not be PD. No info on permission is given. A.Savin 00:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Uploaded in the ru-wp as FairUse - see ru:Файл:Валериан Кирхоглани, 1950.jpg. --Kaganer (talk) 23:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete appears likely copyright violation. -Pete F (talk) 04:30, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Scan of a 1983 postcard. Certainly not own photo by uploader. A.Savin 00:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Copyright violation, inaccurate description. -Pete F (talk) 04:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. The good file. This file should be maintained. The file is in stock images are allowed to freely run. Art-and-Air (talk) 15:24, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
The file is in stock images are allowed to freely run: http://www.free-photos.biz/photographs/nature/stars/348303_hero-city_obelisk_postcard_01.php Art-and-Air (talk) 15:33, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. I think that this file can be left in the warehouse.Otto (talk) 13:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Scan of a modern painting of 1983, certainly not by uploader, no infos on permission. A.Savin 00:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete, copyright violation. -Pete F (talk) 04:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. The good file. This file should be maintained. The file is in stock images are allowed to freely run. Art-and-Air (talk) 15:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
The file is in stock images are allowed to freely run:http://www.free-photos.biz/photographs/nature/stars/348291_hero-city_obelisk_drawing05.php Art-and-Air (talk) 15:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. I think that this file can be left in the warehouse.Otto (talk) 13:36, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
The Flickr user is not the copyright holder of the image, the copyright owner is Leonardo Araya. There is no evidence that the copyright owner had licensed his image under CC-by. Jespinos (talk) 01:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete ok no problem.--Pixeltoo (talk) 01:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This file was tagged by Saibo as Copyvio for the following reason: google earth images are not free. Please read about Internet images and the intro of COM:L, thanks Saibo (Δ) 01:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
This is the oppose by the uploader from my talk page:
- Hello saibo..
- En Français : pour ma part, je ne vois pas de problème
1) Comme cela était déjà précisé ; Ce fichier provient d'un article qui est lui même en licence ouverte compatible avec Commons :
Copyright : "This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose" (Source)}}.
2) l'image ne provient pas de Google earth, mais de la Nasa qui autorise la réutilisation --F. Lamiot (talk) 23:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC). - in english: For my part, I see no problem
1) This file is comming from an article which is itself in open license compatible with Commons: Copyright
: "This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for Any purpose "(Source)} }.
2) the image is not from Google Earth, but from NASA (that allows reuse) --F. Lamiot (talk) 23:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC).
- Hi Lamiot, thank you for your comment. Sorry, I cannot answer well in French, hope it is okay for your in English.
- On the file page it is described as "see Google Earth image, right". So from which NASA source is this satellite image? How do we know it from the NASA? The license for the whole article applies to the work of the authors and they may make errors. Thanks for your help to find out the correct copyright situation! --Saibo (Δ) 01:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hello. Congratulations, you're very observant. Actually one of the images is from Google Earth, I did'nt rememember that.. But the article is written in a journal widely known. This is a refereed journal. I guess the author requested and received permission from Google earth, because in this kind of review, the editor checks that there is permission to publish the image. The editor said: "Copyright This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for Any Purpose." So I deduced that one could use the image on wikipedia and commons. (In this sort of case, are'nt we protected by this sentence ?). If you want, You can possibly try to confirm directly with the author (or Google Earth ?). for me, two or three times I tried to contact authors by e-mail with this kind of application I have not had a response (except once when the holder of satellite images that I found interesting was put itself on Commons responded to my request, here... but it took me a long time to explain why and how to offer this image to Wikimedia Commons) ;
See you soon. --F. Lamiot (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hello. Congratulations, you're very observant. Actually one of the images is from Google Earth, I did'nt rememember that.. But the article is written in a journal widely known. This is a refereed journal. I guess the author requested and received permission from Google earth, because in this kind of review, the editor checks that there is permission to publish the image. The editor said: "Copyright This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for Any Purpose." So I deduced that one could use the image on wikipedia and commons. (In this sort of case, are'nt we protected by this sentence ?). If you want, You can possibly try to confirm directly with the author (or Google Earth ?). for me, two or three times I tried to contact authors by e-mail with this kind of application I have not had a response (except once when the holder of satellite images that I found interesting was put itself on Commons responded to my request, here... but it took me a long time to explain why and how to offer this image to Wikimedia Commons) ;
Deleted: While Google may have given permission for the use in the journal, it is unlikely that they gave a general license. We can;t keep it without evidence of permission from Google for this use. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 20:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
it is only half the logo. + otrs pending since 2010? + no source + no author. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 03:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Of the many things, OTRS appears to be the only issue. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC).
- No, it is not own work and there's consequently no author. No license since 2010. Well, I didn't want to add the no license tag, since the image has a otrs pending tag, maybe it would have been easier. :) --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 11:31, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Of the many things, OTRS appears to be the only issue. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC).
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. The same image was used here on November 21, 2009. Takabeg (talk) 05:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Prior use was months before the upload to Wikipedia; uploader was notified without response. Kablammo (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Plain spam, uploader got a few red noses on ptwiki as well. Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 05:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- If this is spam, how will you rate an award/ certificate such as File:Letter of Appreciation and Commendation Certificate awarded to Rehmat Aziz Chitrali Pakistani Researcher, TV Host and journalist on recognition of outstanding efforts in promotion of literature.jpg . Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:43, 16 April 2012 (UTC).
- Simple: The AWARD was given to a public person in appreciation of something out of the ordinary. The image in question is plain spam, if it is about a Java certificate or something else (commercial) doesn't make any difference. It's advertising. --Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 11:35, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Not own work, created by http://www.jernhusen.se/ grillo (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- OK - but i got it from Jernhusen with a "go"
- Please read Commons:Permission and Commons:Licensing for more information about what kind of permission is required before upload. /grillo (talk) 18:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
This is a statue by Oscar Nemon (1906-1985). There is no FOP in Belgium. BrightRaven (talk) 07:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- I beliewe, this whole affair with FOP in Belgium is big nonsence and made really great pointlesss troubless to many good working wikipedians. For Belgium FOP there is written: Modern pieces of art cannot be the central motive of a commercially available photograph without permission of the artwork copyright holder. But Wikipedia is not commercial subject, everything here is based on voluntary, complimetary contributions of all Wikipedians and Wikipedia did not offer its work for any commercial usage! So, please, use common sense and stop this absurd hunting for images like this one. Thanks, --Karelj (talk) 21:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: The fact that we are a non-commercial project is not the point. All content on this site must be usable for commercial purposes. ViperSnake151 (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Its a scan, but not own work. A source is needed. GeorgHH • talk 10:42, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Yo creo que debería mentenerse. Habría que buscar el autor de la imagen, que por lo que se ve tiene varios años (la persona falleció en 1973).--190.176.199.100 01:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
An high school logo. Copyright violation. 81.214.124.179 15:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes deleted. Sory..--İncelemeelemani (talk) 17:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete Copyvio. At least in Turkey, this image is protected. Takabeg (talk) 03:12, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:28, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Non-free picture. No indication of freeness at source. See [4] Letartean (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Note: As this image was apparently uploaded by an account under the name of the editor-in-chief of the organization who produces the tv series (and also of the source website) [5], the nominator of the DR has agreed to try to contact that person for OTRS confirmation that she holds the rights to release this photo and that it was validly uploaded to Commons. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:42, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:28, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
book cover, clearly not own work. not clear when this book was published, so can't determine its copyright status Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- it was published in lebanon in 1988. Bakkouz (talk) 18:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Then it is still under copyright per {{PD-Lebanon}}. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Not sure whether that cover is really copyrightable. Plain writing isn't and the ornamental frame may be too standard to be a copyrightable work. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- The ornamental frame is creative enough to be copyrighted, and there isn't proof that it's a traditional design used before the copyright cut-off for Lebanon.... 23:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Dieses Foto wurde nicht (wie in der Beschreibung behauptet) von overberg angefertigt, sondern von dem Fotografen Fritz Krauskopf in Königsberg i. Pr. (siehe Signatur rechts unten im Bild); der vollständige Name lässt sich auch der Rückseite der Ansichtskarte entnehmen. Publikationen von Krauskopf lassen sich noch bis in die 30er-Jahre nachweisen. (Hier gibt es sogar einen Hinweis auf die Publikation von Postkarten bis in das Jahr 1943.) Es ist also überhaupt nicht erwiesen, dass der Fotograf vor über 70 Jahren bereits verstorben ist. AFBorchert (talk) 18:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
English summary: This photograph was not (as claimed in the description) created by overberg but by the photographer Fritz Krauskopf who had his business in Königsberg in Prussia. Publications and postcards by him can be found from the 1930s and 1940s. So far we have no proof that this photograph is indeed {{PD-old}} as claimed. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
I've just added another photo by Fritz Krauskopf. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:59, 14 March 2012 (UTC):
- Postkarte ist 1921 gelaufen. Daher--Overberg (talk) 12:40, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Photographer was active in the 1940s, therefore not yet PD . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Product package Funfood ␌ 21:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Logo is not clearly visible. (If it was, it would be Com:DM) and text is {{PD-text}}. --McZusatz (talk) 08:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete The photo of bread is copyrightable. Logo probably not de minimis, cf. case T 3440-08. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:43, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure if "free use" is enough to assume the logo is in public domain. Plushy (talk) 21:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep too simple. Fry1989 eh? 06:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
"Date Unknown" with "copyright has expired" Bulwersator (talk) 22:40, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I think this is somewhere between 1400 and 1700. So the date is unknown but you can say its copyright has expired. --McZusatz (talk) 07:44, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Dubious "Own work" - web resolution Bulwersator (talk) 22:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Comment: bigger one on the web: http://www.fernandoleonycastillo.com/portal/RWcab/IMAGENES/29/0_12872_35.jpg --McZusatz (talk) 07:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
"1911 edition Pirates and Traveler gameboard" + "own work" + web resolution Bulwersator (talk) 22:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Comment See Commons:Deletion requests/Image:1911 edition.jpg for the previous deletion request. --Kramer Associates (talk) 05:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: 1911 USA work, therefore PD. The scan does not have a separate copyright. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:34, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Outdated {{PD-Russia}}, each of three artists, belonging to Kukryniksy group, died in 1990-s or 2000, thus the poster is by no means in public domain --Blacklake (talk) 10:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Kameraad Pjotr 18:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Possibly a copyright violation as http://www.abendzeitung-muenchen.de/inhalt.muenchen-wie-gefaehrlich-ist-der-u-bahn-bau.85398e6a-1399-4f81-9084-16e81a25fe65.html seems to show the same picture. (Can´t access the OTRS release, might be covered by that.) Rudolph Buch (talk) 12:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Uploader has supported delete on my talk page. --Rudolph Buch (talk) 17:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:28, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
some track layout without scale, location, anything. Non usable Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 03:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Without further metadata, there is no clear educational value. Out of scope at least in its present form. -Pete F (talk) 04:35, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 03:05, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Sources? This looks very dubious. ~ Fry1989 eh? 23:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Seems to be the official military flag of Somalia (c.f. [6]). User also indicated it was his/her own work. Middayexpress (talk) 14:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I can't find a translator and can't read Somali. However, the site is a blog, and appears to have gotten the image from here, so I'm not so sure it's a source we can trust. Fry1989 eh? 19:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- The image is apparently the uploader's own work, so there's no issue there. The question is whether the flag really is that of the military of Somalia. On this point, the article linked to above is titled Ciidanka Soomaaliya, which is also the title of the Military of Somalia article on the Somali Wikipedia [7]. Thus, it would indeed appear that the flag is that of the military of Somalia. Middayexpress (talk) 14:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- But there's still no proof. I can make a blog and claim anything I want in it. There's no sources or photographs, and I can't find any support for this on notable flag websites like FOTW. Fry1989 eh? 19:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I follow. Proof of what? That that's the military flag of Somalia? Middayexpress (talk) 15:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes. So far, there is no proof it's real. Just because it's on a blog (and the blog got it from here btw) doesn't prove it's a real flag. Fry1989 eh? 19:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I follow. Proof of what? That that's the military flag of Somalia? Middayexpress (talk) 15:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- But there's still no proof. I can make a blog and claim anything I want in it. There's no sources or photographs, and I can't find any support for this on notable flag websites like FOTW. Fry1989 eh? 19:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- The image is apparently the uploader's own work, so there's no issue there. The question is whether the flag really is that of the military of Somalia. On this point, the article linked to above is titled Ciidanka Soomaaliya, which is also the title of the Military of Somalia article on the Somali Wikipedia [7]. Thus, it would indeed appear that the flag is that of the military of Somalia. Middayexpress (talk) 14:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I can't find a translator and can't read Somali. However, the site is a blog, and appears to have gotten the image from here, so I'm not so sure it's a source we can trust. Fry1989 eh? 19:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete I have to agree with Fry1989 on this one. I can't find a single reliable source and the Blog is just a fan based page, with no real sources or references to support the claim regarding the image. Jetijones (talk) 22:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 03:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
The Bridge of Peace in Tbilisi, Georgia
[edit].jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- File:Peace Bridge (Tbilisi 2010).jpg
- File:New Bridge of Rikhe.jpg
- File:New Pedestrian Bridge Tbilisi 2010-05-06a cropped.JPG
- File:New Pedestrian Bridge Tbilisi 2010-05-06a.JPG
- File:New Pedestrian Bridge Tbilisi 2010-05-06b.JPG
- File:Peace Bridge (Tbilisi).jpg
- File:Peace Bridge in Tbilisi (2012).jpg
- File:Peace Bridge in Tbilisi (A).jpg
- File:Peace Bridge in Tbilisi (B).jpg
- File:Peace Bridge in Tbilisi (C).jpg
- File:Peace Bridge in Tbilisi (D).jpg
- File:Peace Bridge in Tbilisi (E).jpg
- File:Peace Bridge in Tbilisi (F).jpg
- File:Peace Bridge in Tbilisi (G).jpg
- File:Peace Bridge in Tbilisi (H).jpg
- File:Peace bridge, Georgia.jpg
- File:Tbilisi, Georgia - Peace Bridge.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for Georgia (or Italy where the bridge was build). I believe this recent bridge even qualifies as artwork [8] Materialscientist (talk) 11:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Do whatever you wish. I consider the nomination totally foolish and reductio ad absurdum. No more comments from me - if commons wish to delete photos, up to you.--George, 14:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Coopyright laws are set by local governments (Georgian in this case), and we have to follow them. Materialscientist (talk) 22:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept Bridges are not architecture and do not have a copyright in almost all countries -- Latvia is the only exception I know of. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted--İncelemeelemani (talk) 18:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Delete Copyvio. At least in Turkey, this image is protected. Takabeg (talk) 03:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
