Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/12/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
_3.jpg){kind=link}
_2_(explanation).jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Der Codex Aureus Epternacensis wurde in Echternach geschrieben und nicht im Kloster Reichenau. 84.137.175.17 13:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- The motivation adduced would justify a change of description, not a deletion. Esoglou (talk) 14:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept. according to Esoglou's comment --:bdk: 17:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Copyrighted, see source мιѕѕ мαηzαηα (talk) 16:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted by Getty Images; nothing was received at OTRS. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
An improved version of this file with a more descriptive filename has been uploaded to File:European Output of Books 500–1800.png Tentotwo (talk) 03:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support: Redundant duplicate. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 09:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied (bad name) — billinghurst sDrewth 13:14, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Uploader is not copyright holder. Author confirmed via e-mail that this is copyvio. ELEKHHT 01:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Delete unless OTRS permission is forthcoming. --Claritas (talk) 01:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)- Withdraw Sorry, there was some misunderstanding. The author now agrees to release it under a CC-BY-SA license at this resolution. Will amend license and tag for OTRS pending. --ELEKHHT 02:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS received russavia (talk) 11:50, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Poor quality, better alternatives in Category:Doxylamine. Leyo 11:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Chemically incorrect (missing "N" in one of the rings). DMacks (talk) 17:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 13:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Poor quality; better alternatives in Category:Methylphenidate. Leyo 11:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It is unused and there are superior alternatives. Ed (Edgar181) 13:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Poor quality; better alternatives in Category:Methylphenidate. Leyo 11:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It is unused and there are superior alternatives. Ed (Edgar181) 13:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Low quality/resolution; better alternatives in Category:Pseudoephedrine. Leyo 11:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It is unused and there are superior alternatives. Ed (Edgar181) 13:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Stereochemical information missing; better alternatives in Category:Venlafaxine. Leyo 11:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: It is unused and there are superior alternatives. Ed (Edgar181) 13:19, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photo; unused since February 2010 Hystrix (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- delete. But how do you know that it's unused since February 2010 (rather than unused now)? NVO (talk) 21:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting question: The image may have been used since February 2010. It is currently not used and was uploaded in February 2010. It may have been used so in the meantime. Hystrix (talk) 23:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- If there's any tool which checks the useage history across projects, please let me know also. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 18:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting question: The image may have been used since February 2010. It is currently not used and was uploaded in February 2010. It may have been used so in the meantime. Hystrix (talk) 23:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photo; unused since February 2010 Hystrix (talk) 00:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, low quality --AtelierMonpli (talk) 07:34, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photo; unused since February 2010 Hystrix (talk) 00:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photo; unused since February 2010 Hystrix (talk) 00:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photo; unused since February 2010 Hystrix (talk) 00:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
out of scope, unnecessary pdf file (text can be written) AtelierMonpli (talk) 00:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photo; unused since February 2010 Hystrix (talk) 00:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Is this a copyvio? I'm not sure who this Barney is, but it looks like a commercial product and thus probably not anything published under the Free Art Licence. Stefan4 (talk) 00:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 02:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
out of scope, includes possibly copyrighted images AtelierMonpli (talk) 01:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photo; unused since January 2010 Hystrix (talk) 01:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Educational value unclear. -Pete F (talk) 16:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
image uploaded specifically to attack or denigrate some third-party individual DS (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 10:18, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Educational value unclear. -Pete F (talk) 16:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Promotional poster for band unidentified with any link or text. Educational value unclear. Pete F (talk) 04:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Logo of some consumer's organization in the Netherlands - unused, article on nl-wiki deleted. No foreseeable use. Lymantria (talk) 10:25, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
image uploaded solely for promotional purposes DS (talk) 14:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
and File:Dueñas y Amigos.jpg, File:Roger Duenas.jpg. Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Unidentifiable image, out of scope Funfood ␌ 16:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Very small curch sign/logo, related article on enwp already deleted, out of scope Funfood ␌ 16:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
See desc - seems to be an attack image Saibo (Δ) 17:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. and out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
unused since wikipage deleted in oct 2010. Chesdovi (talk) 19:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
oos: man in water with two thumbs up? Chesdovi (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
oos: man in water with two thumbs up? "Oh Yeah" Chesdovi (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
What is this? Chesdovi (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
What is this? Chesdovi (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
oos Chesdovi (talk) 19:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
unused image depicting a fantasy house and swimming pool? Chesdovi (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- File:Zombie Exhibit.png
- File:0wn3d water fall.png
- File:City hall.png
- File:Xenocidal Shrine.png
- File:Grike Towers.png
- File:Lighthouse.png
- File:Tree Farm.png
- File:0wn3d Warp Zone.png
- File:0wn3d Village Population.png
- File:Village Mines.png
a dark cave with lots of red hearts? and other useless images. Chesdovi (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Are you a wikipedian? If not, goodbye. Chesdovi (talk) 19:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
And which studio would that be Dukeyman? Chesdovi (talk) 19:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:06, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Too cool for commons Chesdovi (talk) 19:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
chin missing Chesdovi (talk) 19:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
unused logo. copyvio? Chesdovi (talk) 19:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Advertisement text logo, related enwp page already deleted Funfood ␌ 19:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Personal family photos with unclear rights Funfood ␌ 19:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Advertising image, see description Funfood ␌ 19:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Advertiement logo, related enwp article already deleted Funfood ␌ 19:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Advertising logo, related enwp article already deleted Funfood ␌ 19:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Advertising logo, related article on enwp already deleted Funfood ␌ 19:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Educational value unclear, likely copyvio. -Pete F (talk) 16:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Advertising, related enwp article deleted Funfood ␌ 21:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope - no description, no educational use possible. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 21:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Test file uploaded by me Reedy (talk) 22:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request George Chernilevsky talk 21:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Test file uploaded by me Reedy (talk) 22:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request George Chernilevsky talk 21:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Test image upload, user wanted it to be deleted later, out of scope Funfood ␌ 23:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Test upload George Chernilevsky talk 21:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
copyrighted image, all rights reseived 95.179.31.168 21:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted movie poster. Merry Christmas! – Kwj2772 (msg) 15:56, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
A duplicate. Seems that the original image also has the problems mentioned fixed now. 90.190.114.172 07:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused + dup. ■ MMXX talk 15:50, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Doesn't look like an own work; it is a stock image provided by the campaign (see http://www.mauricetornay.ch/campagne/images/fond/osons.ch/dindex.jpg) User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 22:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Copyvio from http://shirt.woot.com/blog/viewentry.aspx?id=10962 Man vyi (talk) 06:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -Pete F (talk) 16:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Fastily Captain-tucker (talk) 22:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
parce que je m'en vais Barbe-Noire (talk) 20:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion of page Trijnstel (talk) 20:33, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Definitely not "own work", no source information, no proof it is actually Ada Lovelace, a year, etc. Ottava Rima (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Note, the account adding it had its only edit, had a name of the subject (Ada Lovelace), is replacing a proven image of the subject, and made the same edit as an IP that decided to remove the two actual portraits of the subject. Ottava Rima (talk) 16:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted on Dec. 21 by User:Fastily because it was tagged as having no source. Rosenzweig τ 15:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Ripped off from http://itunes.apple.com/tw/app/art-slide-puzzle-free-leonardo/id357438185?mt=8 Fred the Oyster (talk) 08:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:32, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
it is not licensed and updated properly Nishaninan (talk) 08:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Lower resolution dupe of File:Salvator Mundi (around 1500, private coll., possibly Leonardo).jpg Fred the Oyster (talk) 08:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Trawled from the net, multiple hits on Google. This is obviously not the uploader's own work and he has no right to license it. Fred the Oyster (talk) 08:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
A lower resolution dupe of File:Leda and the Swan 1505-1510.jpg listed as uploader's own work. I somehow doubt that Da Vinci has quite got the hang of uploading to the Internet in his state of shuffled off mortal coil. Fred the Oyster (talk) 09:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
probably copyvio 88.128.88.158 15:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
screenshot of nonfree content (website) DS (talk) 15:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as {{Copyvio}}. -Pete F (talk) 20:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
screenshot of nonfree content (website) DS (talk) 15:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as {{Copyvio}}. -Pete F (talk) 20:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Too small image, no use, out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:25, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Veeramuthu.e MUTHU. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:38, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Bad quality image, no use, out of scope Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Veeramuthu.e MUTHU. --Stefan4 (talk) 02:38, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:34, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Copyvio, image clearly has a watermark Dismas (talk) 23:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:34, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Work by Robert Delaunay who died in 1941. This means that the work is only in public domain in France (Delaunay was French) from next January 1st. From then it can be published as {{PD-art}}, until then it is not free. Lymantria (talk) 06:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Keep - just keep this open for two weeks. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:47, 18 December 2011 (UTC)- Keep It is PD now, since artist died more than 70 years ago. Kneiphof (talk) 02:14, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Work in the public domain. Jean-Fred (talk) 14:38, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
copyvio 88.128.88.158 15:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Denniss (talk) 18:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
probably copyvio 88.128.88.158 15:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I came across this artist's freely released works before. I hope they weren't simply flicr washed or something. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 18:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Denniss (talk) 18:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
probably copyvio 88.128.88.158 15:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Where does this information come from? VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 18:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete clear copyvio - painting is signed, no OTRS proof, no proof it is licensed properly, no proof of own work. This should have been removed long ago and it is a problem that Beta_M makes keeps without doing any research. The whole category should probably be cleaned up immediately - speedied and purged. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Can we stop with the personal attacks please? You run around all the deletion requests accusing everybody of every misdeed, and yet it is you who is being desruptive. I have provided the reason on another Bottelho deletion request, you didn't even bother checking that, wonderful fucking researcher you are. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 05:42, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - obviously no permission. --Claritas (talk) 15:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Comment There's all evidence in the world that the real artist is uploading these things. I'm not going to fight a call for OTRS, but at least time should be given for the artist to get OTRS.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Kept. Denniss (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
probably copyvio 88.128.88.158 15:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Where does this information come from? VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 18:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Denniss (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
"for publication" is not a compatible license 88.128.88.158 15:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 18:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Looks like a web site which is probably copyrighted. Note the numbers 2006 and 2009 on the loast two lines which might be years. Stefan4 (talk) 13:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 16:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
No assertion that the school ever allowed for their works to be put under a CC license. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Too complex. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom.--GrapedApe (talk) 01:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Per above. No proof of permission and to complex to be PD-ineligible. MGA73 (talk) 12:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Duplicated image of File:Seal of the Bank of Thailand.svg Octahedron80 (talk) 13:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 14:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
zu gross Zoro Mettini (talk) 08:58, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
screenshot of nonfree content (website) DS (talk) 15:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
screenshot of nonfree content (website) DS (talk) 15:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 15:01, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Nice nudie but Commons is no private photo album 80.187.102.99 16:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, most interesting, valuable, and useful shot, displays nude in sauna situation, with sun exposure to skin, and unique artistic tattoo markings. -- Cirt (talk) 23:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion given. -mattbuck (Talk) 04:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
nichts sagend Hardo Brinkmann 02:17, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - User requested deletion of unused own upload. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
______________
Deleted per nomination & mattbuck. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Source is "my PC" User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious own work (could be found on the web before 2009) PierreSelim (talk) 13:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio from elsewhere? Stefan4 (talk) 14:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work, screenshot PierreSelim (talk) 12:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
From a facebook site http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=60923786341 rights not clear Funfood ␌ 16:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. PierreSelim (talk) 12:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio, screenshot of a TV ! Defeder (talk) 09:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Morning Sunshine (talk) 02:16, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
How can this be Free Art Licence? Looks like a derivative work of something else. Stefan4 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Close this request and discuss at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tsundere Hakase instead. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by MBisanz Morning Sunshine (talk) 02:16, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Russia 80.187.102.99 16:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by AFBorchert Morning Sunshine (talk) 02:17, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio. Deleted image: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Altay.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:TAI.jpg. Takabeg (talk) 17:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily Morning Sunshine (talk) 02:17, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the right place to bring this up at, but I'm questioning the licence. Commons had CC-BY-SA 2.0 whereas Flickr has CC-BY 2.0. I fixed Commons so that it matches Flickr, but I don't see why this would have been published under a Creative Commons licence in the first place. The document mentions "Vancouver Town Planning Commission" and "Bartholomew Associates" (Flickr additionally mentions "Harland Bartholomew"). If it is a crown copyright, it is {{PD-Canada}} because of age, and, since it doesn't seem to contain any copyright statement, this would also mean that it is {{PD-1996}} in the United States. If it is instead copyrighted by Harland Bartholomew or anyone else, it might still be {{PD-Canada}} because of its age, but it's not possible to tell and it's not clear whether it would be {{PD-1996}} or {{PD-US-URAA}}. Stefan4 (talk) 00:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, unless somebody qualified can clarify PD status convincingly. -Pete F (talk) 14:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
The jpg is a page from A Plan for the City of Vancouver, British Columbia, including a General Plan of the Region which was commissioned by the City of Vancouver and authored by the Vancouver Town Planning Commission along with Harland Bartholomew. The City's archives also state that the City owns the copyright. More information on the copyright issue can be found here: http://www.archive.org/details/vancplanincgen00vanc. carbontalks (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2011 (PST)
- Delete per nom, copyright violation. -Pete F (talk) 14:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 14:37, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Permission from source needs to be obtained first, before uploading. There's no reasonable ground for inclussion at this stage. A. Kupicki (talk) 22:01, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- The uploader says that permission has been emailed, via the OTRS system. Chzz ► 23:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS ticket #2011111310003878 PeterSymonds (talk) 14:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Renomination #1
This high resolution photo, Glamourina1.jpg, was uploaded by a first time user Musicfanz1 on November 5. At first the permission was missing and it was nominated for deletion on November 11. [1] Permission was sent to OTRS November 13. The copyright holder was shocked to find that a high resolution image (3456 by 5184) was uploaded and has requested this be changed to lower resolution (682 by 1023) version. User:Pikks (w:en:User:Pikks) brought this up on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. archived discussion
. Unfortunately the "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license" on this hi-res image is permanent but there is no requirement that it be permanently hosted on the Commons. The image was uploaded by a first time user who made a mistake. We should encourage professional photographers to contribute to the Commons and still allow them to make a living. The copyright holder of this image will be hesitant to donate any more images and will tell other photographers of their treatment here. The donor made a timely request to have the mistake corrected so we should help out. Wikipedia/Commons has developed reputation as a place hostile to newcomers so correcting this mistake is good for the Commons. Swtpc6800 (talk) 04:54, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Glamourina1.jpg){kind=link}
Delete the high resolution version. The file has been uploaded under CC license, and it can be kept here forever, however it is up to Commons whether it will be removed or not. The photo was not intended to be in the same format it was generated by the photo camera. It was clearly a mistake because or Musicfanz1 had to resize it or to inform the copyright holder that it will be uploaded as-is. As soon as the copyright holder noticed the 5MB photo is available on wiki, kindly requested to keep the photo, but the lower resolution one. --★ Pikks ★ MsG 09:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per Pikks - revert to low res and revdel the others. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per Pikks. -Pete F (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete the high-res version(s). It was only uploaded a month earlier and not by the author themselves but via communications with the author, and it seems there was initial confusion in the communications. If the author's true desire is only for a low-res version to be licensed, I think it's appropriate to follow that. Different if the author themselves had uploaded it, and came back a year or two later, but this is not anywhere near a case like that. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:21, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Allow deletion as copyright holder was apparently confused as to what image they were granting permission on. But to lessen confusion this request should have been done in a new page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Re-using the same page is basically how all re-nominations are done now... it does let you see previous arguments and discussions. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy snow close/half delete thing I said above - no need to drag this out, everyone seems in agreement. -mattbuck (Talk) 05:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
I dont like categorize content Gigawitchman (talk) 04:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Delete out of scope pdf of text --Kramer Associates (talk) 06:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
I dont like categorize content 201.149.25.61 17:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 14:37, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
File:010_обратная_сторона_-_Памятная_Медаль_защитникам_ORBET,_с_портретом_Принца_Пьетро_Аморозо_д'_Арагона.jpg
[edit]
This is not PD simple and I doubt we have permission to use this photo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Wrongly tagged for a while, definitely not ineligible. →Nagy 19:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
I really think that this is a copyvio. Stefan4 (talk) 14:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted advertisement, per [2]. →Nagy 18:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Probably copyvio, but the similar user name suggest that it might not be the case. Stefan4 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted cover. →Nagy 18:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Please delete the first version of this image, uploaded by myself, as I accidentally uploaded the wrong image, and it shows a direct screenshot of the cartoon The Transformers, which is under copyright. Please do not delete the current version of the image, which is the correct one, and has the permission of the convention organisers. JIP (talk) 21:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Done. →Nagy 19:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Images by User:PittyPavi
[edit]- File:Batticaloa Lagoon in Korai Adi.jpg
- File:Batticaloa lighthouse Alone.jpg
- File:Fishing Batticaloa 3.jpg – http://markus-spring.info/wp/2008/07/fishermen-at-sunrise/
- File:Fishing batticaloa 2.jpg – http://markus-spring.info/wp/2008/07/hauling-in-net/
- File:Fishing batticaloa.jpg – http://markus-spring.info/wp/2008/07/long-shadows-on-beach/
- File:Fish in Batticaloa.jpg – http://markus-spring.info/wp/2008/10/kalmunai-catch/
- File:Bone Island, Batticaloa in Bird's-eye in the latter part.jpg
- File:Beach Batticaloa.jpg – http://www.flickr.com/photos/springm/3633308525/
- File:Batticaloa Temple.jpg
- File:Batticaloa Mugathuvaram.jpg – http://www.flickr.com/photos/fs450d/5737325014/
- File:Batticaloa Market.jpg – http://srilanka.usembassy.gov/pr-11-12-08-html.html
- File:Batticaloa Fisher 2.jpg
- File:Batticaloa Entrance.jpg – http://www.panoramio.com/photo/12124577
- File:Batticaloa Fisher.jpg
- File:Batticaloa Clock Tower.jpg
- File:Batticaloa Bridge.jpg – http://www.panoramio.com/photo/36596950
- File:Batticaloa Boat.jpg – http://www.panoramio.com/photo/7236346
- File:Batticaloa Beach.jpg – http://www.flickr.com/photos/sekitar/6074478126/
- File:Batticaloa entrance lagoon- sunset.jpg
- File:Battcaloa Whte Bridge.jpg – EXIF: REUTERS/Andrew Caballero-Reynolds
- File:Batticaloa bus stand in town.jpg
- File:Angelinajolie.jpg
Strange text ("Utopia Batticaloa") at the bottom, suggesting that they were taken from elsewhere. Additionally, most of them have no EXIF metadata. The last one looks like a cover of a book, CD or some other product. I think that the images might be copyright violations. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- The last one is a copyvio: derivative work of a very common Jolie picture. BrightRaven (talk) 12:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete for me (I've speedily deleted the obvious copyvio). I think own work in such a variety of styles etc is very unlikely. --Herby talk thyme 13:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Every one should understand that this is not a copy photos from any magazines it's a collection of mine and UTOPIA is an unidentified charector in the font Birdman that's the reason you are seeing it. (talk) 11:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete --Kanags (talk) 22:00, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete--சஞ்சீவி சிவகுமார் (talk) 23:03, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Delete all. Many of the files are copyvios of commons images themselves (as pointed in below section). Uploader is obviously lying when he says there are from "his collection". --Sodabottle (talk) 07:09, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete all. I've added some sources and other evidence of copyright violations in the list above. The original version of File:Batticaloa Market.jpg is {{PD-USGov-USAID}}, but I don't really see the educational use of the over-saturated version with a huge banner at the bottom. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Original author of the pictures
[edit]The EXIFs of following files clearly indicate the author of the photographer.
- File:Bone Island, Batticaloa in Bird's-eye in the latter part.jpg
- File:Batticaloa Lagoon in Korai Adi.jpg
- File:Batticaloa entrance lagoon- sunset.jpg
You can see my origional pictures as follows:
- File:Bone Island, Batticaloa in Bird's-eye view.jpg
- File:Batticaloa Lagoon.jpg
- File:Batticaloa lagoon, sunset.jpg
Files without EXIF:
You can see my origional pictures as follows:
Also, one of my pictures is edited and used in the same Gallery. The file is File:Batticaloa lagoon, fishing boats in Other side.jpg The origional file is File:Batticaloa lagoon, fishing boats.jpg --~Anton~ 19:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 14:47, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Images by User:Masader
[edit]- File:مصادر المعلومات الالكترونية.jpg
- File:السنما.gif
- File:البريد.jpg
- File:الإرشاد.jpg
- File:محاضرات.jpg
- File:تدريب الطلاب.png
- File:تعليم تعاوني في مجموعات صغيرة.jpg
- File:المشاركة في التصميم والتطوير المعلوماتي والتكنولوجي.jpg
- File:المكتبة الرقمية.jpg
- File:1المكتبة الرقمية.jpg
- File:الكتب الرقمية.jpg
- File:رسائل الماجستير والدكتوراة.jpg
- File:التقارير.jpg
- File:تقارير البحوث 1.jpg
- File:حوليات.jpg
- File:بحوث المؤتمرات2.jpg
- File:مخطوطه 1.jpg
- File:كتب.jpg
- File:قاموس.jpg
- File:الأدلة.jpg
- File:الكشافات.jpg
- File:إرشادية.jpg
- File:المستخلصات.jpg
- File:تقويم سنوي.jpg
- File:موسوعة.jpg
- File:كتب.gif
- File:السمع البصرية.jpg
- File:رسوم بيانية.jpg
- File:جهاز عرض السلايدات بأنواعة.jpg
- File:الأوفرهد.png
- File:جهاز عرض السلايدات بأنواعه.jpg
- File:شرائح مجهرية.gif
- File:جهاز عرض الشفافيات.png
- File:النموذج.png
- File:جهاز عرض الأفلام الثابته.jpg
- File:وسائل تعليمية.jpg
- File:لعبة تعلم الأرقام والوقت والأحرف والمسار.jpg
- File:الشفافيات.jpg
- File:عينات.jpg
- File:ضيف1.jpg
- File:ضيف2.jpg
- File:التعلم عن بعد.jpg
- File:الخدمات المرجعية.jpg
- File:مصادر المعلومات الموضوعية ذات التخصصات المحددة والدقيقة.png
- File:مصادر المعلومات الموضوعية ذات التخصصات الشاملة أو تعرف أحيانا بغير المتخصصة.png
- File:شريط سمعي.jpg
- File:ايميل.jpg
- File:برامج محادثه.jpg
- File:تقارير.jpg
I marked some of his image as copyvios, but I have my doubt about the rest of them too. Some could be own work but they generally lack EXIF metadata. It also looks as if some were produced at a low resolution and then enlarged, which is unlikely for own works. Note the URL www.gaza-hacker.net on one of them. I'm proposing his contributions in entirety, except for those tagged elsewhere, for deletion. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 16:21, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tsundere Hakase (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:DW. Photos of dolls showing characters from Japanese popular culture, e.g. Mahō Shōjo Madoka Magika.
- File:Alicemod.png
- File:Ayamod.png
- File:Chenmod.png
- File:Byakurenmod.png
- File:Cirnomod.png
- File:Eirinmod.png
- File:Flandremod.png
- File:Reimumod.png
- File:Hatatemod.png
- File:Hinamod.png
- File:Ichirinmod.png
- File:Ikumod.png
- File:Kaguyamod.png
- File:Keinemod.png
- File:Kanakomod.png
- File:Exkeinemod.png
- File:Koakumamod.png
- File:Kisumemod.png
- File:Kogasamod.png
- File:Koishiexmod.png
- File:Koishimod.png
- File:Komachimod.png
- File:Lilyblackmod.png
- File:Lettymod.png
- File:Lilywhitemod.png
- File:Lunasamod.png
- File:Lyricamod.png
- File:Chinamod.png
- File:Marisamod.png
- File:Merlinmod.png
- File:Exminorikomod.png
- File:Minorikomod.png
- File:Mikomod.png
- File:Mokoumod.png
- File:Exmokoumod.png
- File:Momijimod.png
- File:Mugetsumod.png
- File:Exmystiamod.png
- File:Murasamod.png
- File:Mystiamod.png
- File:Nazrinmod.png
- File:Nitorimod.png
- File:Nuemod.png
- File:Okuumod.png
- File:Patchymod.png
- File:Qbmod.png
- File:Reisenmod.png
- File:Ranmod.png
- File:Remiliamod.png
- File:Renkomod.png
Stefan4 (talk) 14:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 14:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JustCeliaS (talk · contribs)
[edit]Both files are identical. There is no need to keep two copies. They look like copyvios so presumably we shouldn't keep a single one of them.
Stefan4 (talk) 16:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. Rosenzweig τ 20:34, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
funny text pdfs
[edit]out of scope - whatever this is. Seem to be chat logs or some internet jokes. If the author statement is real: permission missing.
Saibo (Δ) 17:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
adult content 88.128.88.158 15:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep When will these nominations end? There needs to be some sort of pre-deletion request check boxes like "I understand that adult content is allowed on Commons", other things like "I understand that i should not nominate again 2 days after previous closing" and "I will not nominate without a description" can help as well. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 18:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - no valid reason for deletion given. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:24, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Not useful, EXIF data is missing, dubious ownership of image, etc. The email address on the image is for an exhibitionist website and promotional. Most likely, it was taken from that site without proof of permission as the site appears to use that to mark who submitted to the site. At the very least, it would require some kind of OTRS related proof of originating the image. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Looking at user's other uploads they don't look like copyright wash, they look like a genuine account which simply exists on both sites. I do agree that we should request OTRS though just to be on the safe side, maybe even remove the watermark by blurring or cropping. VolodyA! V Anarhist Beta_M (converse) 18:56, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, agree with analysis by Volody, above. -- Cirt (talk) 00:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Per Ottava, strange license, strange scope. --Yikrazuul (talk) 20:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- "Could be" or "may be" are not convincing licenses. --Yikrazuul (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Other uploads by the user confirm that this was self-made. High quality, educational purpose. Handcuffed (talk) 07:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No proof of uploader being the copyright holder (COM:OTRS) so COM:PRP applies here. russavia (talk) 04:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
"small" and unused image , low quality AtelierMonpli (talk) 00:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:47, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
An updated version of this file with a more descriptive filename has been uploaded to File:European Output of Books 500–1800.pdf Tentotwo (talk) 03:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:48, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Appears to be a much lower-resolution copy of File:Aum chef.gif. Redundant. Pete F (talk) 04:53, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
All it sais was authorized use: not enough permission for us to host the image here. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Author is the Swiss Military; not sure if we are able to continue hosting this image here. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
No permission from Lappeenranta University of Technology. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Arms taken from http://www.ufba.br/manual-de-identidade-visual directly. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
-- "Don't need remove the file... This file is Public Domain!"
- If it regarding age, it is not. The uploader claimed it is PD-old because the author died 70 years ago. The arms were barely created 70 years ago and the creator is still alive as of 2011, so the entire reasoning for the license is false. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 17:52, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:51, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
The symbol was created in 1988; the cutoff for the template is 1983. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
No source; it is a seal of a university and no assertion the uploader is a representative of the university. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
No permission from the Academia Paraibana de Letras User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Claims own work, yet claims the author as Canadian International School of Beijing User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
I am the author of Canadian International School of Beijing. I don't work there anymore as per August 2011, but when I was still working there, I was part of the community management team and one of our task was to promote awareness of our school through social media and internet. Wikipedia was one of our ways to promote our school since it will help increase the search result rating for our website. This file was obtained from our image bank and I used it in our Wikipedia article in my capacity as part of the community management team at that time. It was not a violation of right because I obtained the right to publish that image from my employer which was Canadian International School of Beijing.
I don't understand why a legitimate article such as Canadian International School of Beijing always had a hard time to sustain. What do I need to do to make it clear that it's a legitimate article with everything in it was created by the rightful owner, that I did not violate any copyrights when creating it? User:luminouzity (Return fire) 16:25:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- The right to publish is not enough for our purposes. If you look at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing "Wikimedia Commons accepts only free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose." We must be able to use this image commercially, we must be able to modify it; we also need an explicit notice from your former employer on this kind of usage. If we don't have it, we can't host it here. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 16:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
It says Own work, but is this really own work? It says that it is a satellite photo. Does the user really have his own private satellite? Stefan4 (talk) 12:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:55, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Really own work? I proposed the deletion of the other images by this user, and I'm proposing this one for deletion too since I don't trust the licence information. Stefan4 (talk) 13:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 19:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
mistake upload Heymans (talk) 14:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio? Looks like an image taken from elsewhere. Stefan4 (talk) 14:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Looks like a copyrighted logo of some kind. Stefan4 (talk) 14:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
URV (Permission by the photograf needed, pers. violated (OTRS)) Nolispanmo 16:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
I think that this image meets COM:TOO. It is certainly more eligible than Commons:Deletion requests/File:BF-Schriftzug.png / de:Datei:BF-Schriftzug.png. Stefan4 (talk) 16:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Fam. Groß paßt irgendwie nicht ;) Ralf Roleček 16:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:08, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Seems unliekly that the uploader is also the copyright holder of the object of the photo - especially the logo. Dpmuk (talk) 18:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
copyrigthed, as claimed on the watermark JeanBono (talk) 18:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Not PD-old or in Russia. en:Alexander Rodchenko died in 1956. sугсго 18:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Not PD-old or in Russia. en:Alexander Rodchenko died in 1956. sугсго 18:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:12, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Not PD-Russia2008. en:Mikhail Kaufman died in 1980. sугсго 18:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:12, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Not PD-old or PD-Russia2008, Georgiy Zelma died in 1984. sугсго 18:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:13, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted magazine cover, http://thechap.net/ Funfood ␌ 19:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 20:14, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
New version doubtfully same person as original upload, enwp article already deleted Funfood ␌ 11:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Too complex for {{PD-ineligible}}. The user name makes me set this up for a normal deletion request instead of a copyvio one. Stefan4 (talk) 14:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Too complex for {{PD-ineligible}}. The user name makes me set this up for a normal deletion request instead of a copyvio one. Stefan4 (talk) 14:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Simple screenshot of a properties-window, unused and out of scope Funfood ␌ 14:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Taken from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=85530352 where watermarked as www.marmox.it, the content of which is CC-BY-NC-SA. ELEKHHT 21:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
_3.jpg){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Japan. It could probably go to ja: under ja:Template:屋外美術. Stefan4 (talk) 16:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
_3.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This work ? is located permanently in open place. Takabeg (talk) 03:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- This looks like a bad nomination from my side. It looks like a utilitarian object. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:13, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Probably not an artwork PierreSelim (talk) 08:11, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
_3.jpg){kind=link}
_2_(explanation).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2_(explanation).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Japan. It could probably go to ja: under ja:Template:屋外美術. Stefan4 (talk) 16:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
_2_(explanation).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This work ? is located permanently in open place. Takabeg (talk) 03:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Japan has FOP for buildings and non-commercial FOP for artworks, but doesn't seem to have any FOP at all for literary works. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per stefan4 PierreSelim (talk) 08:12, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
_2_(explanation).jpg){kind=link}
1979 artwork, no evidence of it being in the Public Domain Zolo (talk) 19:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- 1979 was the date the artwork was given to the museum. It's actual date of creation is not listed on the file page. So I guess that means it's from 1979 or earlier. I'll try to find out the actual date of creation. Anyone know the copyright laws of Cameroon? Kaldari (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- I find COM:L a little underspecified here; why is the source nation Cameroon here? I can't see why Cameroon FOP would matter, because the photo was shot in the US. The object itself is most likely unpublished, and the photo comes from the US.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:46, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Even if the object is unpublished, many countries have copyright laws that cover unpublished works. Kaldari (talk) 19:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- I find COM:L a little underspecified here; why is the source nation Cameroon here? I can't see why Cameroon FOP would matter, because the photo was shot in the US. The object itself is most likely unpublished, and the photo comes from the US.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:46, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: We cannot assume it's not copyrighted in the US. PierreSelim (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Files from uniforminsignia.org, copyvio
[edit]- File:POR Navy OR8.GIF
- File:POR Navy OR9.GIF
- File:POR-Army-OF5-CORTIR.GIF
- File:POR-Army-OF7-MGEN.GIF
- File:POR-Army-OF1-TEN.GIF
- File:POR-Army-OF1- ALF.GIF
- File:Admiral-Australia.jpg
- File:UK Army OF10.png
- File:UK Army OF10-2.png
- File:UK Army OF9.png
- File:UK Army OF9-2.png
- File:UK Army OF8.png
- File:UK Army OF8-2.png
- File:UK Army OF7.png
- File:UK Army OF7-2.png
- File:UK Army Brigadier General (until 1920).png
- File:UK Army Brigadier General (until 1920)-2.png
- File:UK Army OF6.png
- File:UK Army OF6-2.png
- File:UK Army OF5.png
- File:UK Army OF5-2.png
- File:UK Army OF4.png
- File:UK Army OF4-2.png
- File:UK Army OF3.png
- File:UK Army OF3-2.png
- File:UK Army OF2.png
- File:UK Army OF2-2.png
- File:UK Army OF1b.png
- File:UK Army OF1b-2.png
- File:UK Army OF1a.png
- File:UK Army OF1a-2.png
.png){kind=link}
-2.png){kind=link}
For reason, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files from uniforminsignia, copyvio --Officer781 (talk) 08:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Wouldn't at least the "until 1920" images be {{PD-UKGov}}, making the © claim from the uniforminsignia invalid? --Stefan4 (talk) 16:53, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Still, they are edited from images taken from uniforminsignia, so I presume it applies to them too. --Officer781 (talk) 11:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- I see. Delete those too, then. The website uniformsinsignia.org appears to be registered in the Czech Republic and I don't know what the Czech threshold of originality is, but COM:COA#Coat of arms "found on the internet" seems to be quite clear. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Still, they are edited from images taken from uniforminsignia, so I presume it applies to them too. --Officer781 (talk) 11:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Deleted all files except those uploaded by Wiki Romi (and derivative works of his images), as he claims he created them himself, and I can't see a reason not to trust this user, who is a well-known author of many great articles about military history on the Polish Wikipedia. odder (talk) 22:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Santino Foti
[edit]- File:298268 273951749302283 100000623803146 927161 797693144 a.jpg
- File:Santino Foti.jpg
- File:NiNo Fuga.jpg
Images uploaded by user:Santino96santino only to create pages on it.wikipedia about himself. No attestable relevance nor foreseeable usefulness. -- Rojelio (talk) 13:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Denniss (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
The file "TaschenGnomon.jpg" does not exist on Commons, and has never existed, therefore the right hand image lacks licence. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's at de:Datei:TaschenGnomon.jpg. I'll move it here since the licence looks fine. User:Fantagu frequently credits his uploads to "Joachim Baecker", so I take it that it is his real name. Since the TaschenGnomon image has been found, I think that we should Keep the GnomonTips one. --Stefan4 (talk) 01:26, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept, per Stefan4. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
It is a seal of a university, it is not a work of the Brazilian government. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Question: It's a public university. Do we know whether or not public universities in Brazil are equivalent to government agencies with regard to copyright? -Pete F (talk) 16:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- In Brazil, I am not so sure but I know in the United States, copyright belongs to their respective schools. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 20:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. Sreejith K (talk) 07:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
This page is about me and has a photo of me and I would like for it to be taken down fansportsgirls 10:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion of unused file. Sreejith K (talk) 07:09, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
This image, and a version without the text overlay, is scattered all over the web. I doubt very much that it is "own work", although the text may be Sitush (talk) 12:25, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation Sreejith K (talk) 07:09, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't think that this is {{PD-ineligible}}. Certainly not published under the specified Creative Commons licence. Stefan4 (talk) 13:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. Sreejith K (talk) 07:09, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't think that the animals are simple enough to be {{PD-ineligible}}. Stefan4 (talk) 13:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- I got a message via Special:EmailUser from the uploader. The uploader refers to the image as "our logo", which could mean that the uploader is the copyright holder. I sent a message to the uploader explaining that the uploader should follow the instructions at COM:OTRS if the uploader is the copyright holder. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No OTRS permission received. Sreejith K (talk) 07:10, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
I think that this fails COM:FOP#Japan. It could probably go to ja: under ja:Template:屋外美術. Stefan4 (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete This work was located non-permanently in open place. Takabeg (talk) 03:02, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 07:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Might fail COM:FOP#Japan, but it could also be COM:DM. It could probably go to ja: under ja:Template:屋外美術. Stefan4 (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete This work was located non-permanently in open place. Takabeg (talk) 03:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sreejith K (talk) 07:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Upload by User:Fabio Lindoso (23.05.2009) might be copyvio via http://vimarense.zip.net/arch2008-06-01_2008-06-30.html (17.06.2008, written by "NONATO BRITO", jump to "Balneário Itororoma") = .jpg (identical exif). Obs.: the image was uploaded inverted horizontally. Gunnex (talk) 22:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation Sreejith K (talk) 07:15, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
This appears to be a derivative of the photograph that is visible at http://myownmalayalam.blogspot.com/2011/05/mathrubhumi-vyloppilli-sreedhara-menon.html. Attempts have been made to contact the creator of the work but without success - see here and here for the backstory involving various en-WP contributors. Sitush (talk) 13:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - The author is a talented painter and has contributed a lot of his works for Commons. This is an image of a poet who expired in 1985 and hence he would have drawn inspiration from this photograph. There are a lot of changes in this painting, including colour, facial marks and background. I do not know whether that makes it eligible for a new license, I just hope that it does. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Meets threshold of originality. Sreejith K (talk) 07:11, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fails COM:FOP#Japan. It could probably go to ja: under ja:Template:屋外美術. Stefan4 (talk) 16:26, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This work is located permanently in open place. Takabeg (talk) 03:07, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but it is an artistic work. --Stefan4 (talk) 09:40, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. Sreejith K (talk) 07:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fails COM:FOP#Japan. It could probably go to ja: under ja:Template:屋外美術. Stefan4 (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This work is located permanently in open place. Takabeg (talk) 03:08, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but it is an artistic work. There is only non-commercial FOP for those in Japan. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:12, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sreejith K (talk) 07:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Japan. It could probably go to ja: under ja:Template:屋外美術. Stefan4 (talk) 16:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This work is located permanently in open place. Takabeg (talk) 03:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sreejith K (talk) 07:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Japan. It might be possible to move this to ja: under ja:Template:屋外美術, but I'm not sure. Stefan4 (talk) 16:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep This work is located permanently in open place. Takabeg (talk) 03:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Sreejith K (talk) 07:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I personally doubt that author was creator of this work, considering that the boxer only had a short career and died in 1950. Nominate all images in Category:Lavern Roach as well. Jaranda wat's sup 19:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete At least some of these I've found on the web dated to dates before the upload. For example, File:Lavern_1.jpg was uploaded in 2009, but the same image was posted to a forum in March 2006. Any claim that 60-year-old professional portraits of a boxer are the uploader's own work, uploaded at thumbnail resolution and with no metadata, is not credible without further evidence, and this evidence suggests they are all copyvios. The uploader was informed and has not commented for months. Delete this and all uploads in the category. Dcoetzee (talk) 08:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Non-credible claim of copyright ownership, no file date. Transfer one of these images to Wikipedia under fair use, delete all the others. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 08:41, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely own work. Jafeluv (talk) 10:55, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
zwei mall Zoro Mettini (talk) 09:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Kept: two different versions Wvk (talk) 09:08, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Not enough information to substantiate claim of PD-old-100. Looks like a screenshot from a book. Probably googlebooks, judging by the scan. What book? When was it created? Who was the author? Who was the photographer? Unless we have that info, there's no way to verify the PD claim. Beside all that, there's the issue of the copyright status of the badge, which is a totally separate--and unanswered--question. GrapedApe (talk) 13:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete we need more information to substantiate the copyright claims Werieth (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Might be copyvio. The lion comes from a coat of arms for a different province.[3] The lion appears to have been made in 1941 so even if the author died during the same year, it would still be copyrighted for another two weeks. I'm not sure where the city silhouette comes from or whether it is copyrighted. Stefan4 (talk) 13:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Still copyrighted. Werieth (talk) 13:35, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Not an own work; this version is an upscale from at least a 2010 graphic found at http://padevat.info/2010/10/15/kampuchea-1979/ User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 20:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Considering that site has "borrowed" our CoAs (Vietnam, North Korea), how do we know they didn't take this one from us? Fry1989 eh? 22:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- I tried to check upload dates here and at questionable sites. If we were first, the DR would not have happened. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- This COA is wrong and it never existed as such. It is the SOC coat of arms with the name of the PRK on the scroll. New and historically accurate coats of arms are needed.Xufanc (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- I tried to check upload dates here and at questionable sites. If we were first, the DR would not have happened. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 01:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Considering that site has "borrowed" our CoAs (Vietnam, North Korea), how do we know they didn't take this one from us? Fry1989 eh? 22:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Werieth (talk) 13:39, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:01, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Duplicata de cette image Bvs-aca (talk) 12:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- They have different colours so they are obviously not duplicates. Maybe it is a not necessary to have the same SVG coat of arms element in different colours, since it is easy to change the colour when combining elements to a complete SVG COA. But silver helmet is used as it is in Wikipedia articles, and I see no reason why the gold helmet could not also be used. So keep. (Source and author information could be improved, since the gold helmet looks like a derivative of the silver helmet.) /Ö 11:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Not exact dupes. Werieth (talk) 13:32, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Not a dupe PierreSelim (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mirabeau Versand (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement by a company or advertising a business
- File:Übertopf.jpg
- File:Konsolentisch.jpg
- File:Sessel weiß.jpg
- File:Tisch.jpg
- File:Liege.jpg
- File:Bad.jpg
Hystrix (talk) 01:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Advertisement maybe. But uploaded by (assumed) copyright owner under a free license. Pictures are useful to depict this certain type of furniture design. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 20:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Request OTRS, wait, see what happens. These are photos from their catalog -> already published with (c) -> must provide OTRS. Don't assume that user:Mirabeau Versand is fully authorized to publish content from http://www.mirabeau-versand.de/. NVO (talk) 21:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The fact that advertisement companies start releasing their photos under a free licence is a very positive development. VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 18:34, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- All too often businesses are "represented" by incompetent PR people who just don't care about legal matters. They don't realize what free licenses are. They don't read the agreements with their photographers. Worse, they don't have their companies' permission to do what they do. It happens. NVO (talk) 20:35, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- But then we can argue that all too often all uploads are done without reading the licences (i didn't read the full licence text for most free licences, did you?) VolodyA! V Anarhist (converse) 01:24, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- All too often businesses are "represented" by incompetent PR people who just don't care about legal matters. They don't realize what free licenses are. They don't read the agreements with their photographers. Worse, they don't have their companies' permission to do what they do. It happens. NVO (talk) 20:35, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Да, конечно, я под линеечку прочёл и законспектировал полный текст legal code. И нашёл там много такого, что расходится с упрощённым толкованием его "в массах" (в т.ч. операторских).
- Что же до вашей индукции на "просто участников" - конечно же, "обычным" также предъявляют претензии (прямо на этой странице). Только у вашего почтенного полтысячи удалённых файлов (спасибо германским анонимусам). На банальном копивио горят не только новые аккаунты, но и заслуженные десятитысячники. Но, во-первых, многие претензии разрешаются втихую, а, во-вторых, до всего руки не доходят.
- В данном случае есть формальное требование COM:OTRS: если фотография уже публиковалась, то следует прислать разрешение от имени правообладателя. C реальным обратным адресом, на который можно хотя бы по телефону прозвониться и спросить - господа хорошие, вы в курсе, что от вашего имени делается? Бывает, что и не в курсе. NVO (talk) 10:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Until OTRS has been cleared, images are copyrighted per NVO Werieth (talk) 13:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: after 6 months we do not have a valid OTRS attached here. Per NVO, the OTRS is needed, so deleted PierreSelim (talk) 06:25, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Don Alberti (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some of the photos are a duplicates of some of the other photos. There is no need to keep several copies of the same image.
The pictures of paintings look like copyvios. If the paintings are copyvios, there is also a risk that the photos also are copyvios.
One of the photos shows a rather large part of a painting and this might not pass as de minimis.
The article about this person is also proposed by deletion (by someone else): de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/14. Dezember 2011#Cornelius Richter. I don't speak German, so I don't know exactly what people are writing in that deletion request. Might need to be checked by someone who speaks German.
- File:Cornelius Richter.jpg
- File:Freiraumplastik vor der Universität Regensburg von Cornelius Richter.jpg
- File:Colors of Erotic.jpg
- File:Wollust.jpg
- File:Wollust von Cornelius Richter.jpg
- File:Akt Nymphe von Cornelius Richter.jpg
- File:Vogelgesang.jpg
- File:Vulva D`oro.jpg
- File:Hermann Nitsch mit Synästhesie-Gemälde von Cornelius Richter.jpg
- File:Cornelius Richter und Hermann Nitsch.jpg
- File:(Synästhesie) Kreuz des Südens.jpg
- File:(Synästhesie) Sirenen.jpg
- File:Vulva Richter.jpg
- File:Synästhesie Nitsch.jpg
_Kreuz_des_S%C3%BCdens.jpg){kind=link}
_Sirenen.jpg){kind=link}
Stefan4 (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I speak German. The article about Cornelius Richter (visual artist) is proposed for deletion because it seems to fail the notability requirements. The discussion is still controversial. -- W. Edlmeier 08:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Info There is permission for the shown artwork in OTRs ticket:2011121510015056, so no copyvio. Dupes shall be deleted, though. --Krd (talk) 12:07, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Keep in that case, except for the duplicates, since we only need one copy. There was no OTRS ticket there when I reported the images for deletion. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:57, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
The result of the notability debate was delete. -- 88.7.216.227 14:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Would have to agree with dewiki Werieth (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Keep We have an artist giving us images of his work for free, no strings attached - what good does it do the project to delete them? Notability has never been a Commons criteria. These images depict an artist and some of his works - educational even if the artist is at present obscure. We are not art critics, we are a media repository for others to use, we collect images of art works. --Tony Wills (talk) 11:59, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Kept, Thuresson (talk) 20:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Currency of Venezuela
[edit]What does it say Venezuela's law about its money, Is it under public domain?
And another Venezuela's currency uploaded by Veronidae --Ezarateesteban 17:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hola quisiera que alguien tenga la gentileza de de explicarme que significa esta cosa tengo un mes o quizás mas subiendo imágenes de monedas de Venezuela y nadie me había dicho nada, de repente aparece un supuesto administrador y coloca esta cosa, de verdad que esto es una falta de respeto hacia los editores y colaboradores, no es posible que no se hubieran dado cuenta o que simplemente aparezca alguien que no le gusta una imagen o grupo de imágenes y decida que hay que borrarlas y si es así me lo dicen por que no colaboro mas con este sitio no me gusta que me vean cara de boba o de caída de la mata Gracias de antemano atentemente --Veronidae (talk) 19:49, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete copyright violation, uploader is not the holder of the copyright. Werieth (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Deleted, uploader has not explained why Venezuelan currency are licensed under CC-BY-SA. Thuresson (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)