Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2009/12/26

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive December 26^th, 2009

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2854777253_be319acb33.jpg

Only flickr image uploaded by this user. I don't think he knew about the NC and ND restrictions here. Leoboudv (talk) 09:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Tarawneh (talk) 10:28, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Firstbum.jpg

World of Worcaft screenshot Avron (talk) 09:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Tarawneh (talk) 11:21, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Natobank1.jpg

World of Worcaft screenshot Avron (talk) 09:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Tarawneh (talk) 11:20, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Douchebaggerywhispers.jpg

World of Worcaft screenshot Avron (talk) 09:08, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Tarawneh (talk) 11:19, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NohearthJenkins.jpg

World of Worcaft screenshot Avron (talk) 09:08, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Tarawneh (talk) 11:18, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nohearthjenkins1.jpg

World of Worcaft screenshot Avron (talk) 09:09, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Tarawneh (talk) 11:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lepage_Parlement_Europeen.jpg

The quoted permission text says "non-commercial " Teofilo (talk) 09:10, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. non-commercial . Tarawneh (talk) 10:51, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Southshorekkkraid.jpg

World of Worcaft screenshot Avron (talk) 09:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Tarawneh (talk) 19:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bayside.jpg

possibly non-free image from video game, see en:Category:Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas screenshots Havang(nl) (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by High Contrast: Missing essential information: source and/or license

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Battle_of_Edgehill_map.svg

Broken svg. -Nard the Bard 19:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It renders in Firefox. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:37, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but Mediawiki does not render it. -Nard the Bard 19:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then it is possibly a bug of the librsvg. Do you know where the problem is or do you have asked at COM:GVP for help? They helped me once when I had trouble with one of my SVG files (also due to a bug of the librsvg). I suggest to

Keep this image and upload workarounds or fixes on top of this image. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:24, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KeepIt was correctly created with Inscape 0.46 -- Jlorenz1 (talk) 07:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Info Fixed. The SVG contained a reference to a non-embedded bitmap image. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 13:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily kept as this SVG has been fixed now thanks to Ilmari Karonen. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:50, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Big_12.png

out of project scope Havang(nl) (talk) 21:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not obviously out of scope (it's a map marking some counties in the central USA) bug currently lacking useful description. - Jmabel ! talk 01:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Abigor: Outside project scope

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HQ-16-LyThuongKiet.jpg

Works of the South Vietnamese Government do not automatically qualify for PD. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 00:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Image is too young for {{PD-Vietnam}}. -Nard the Bard 00:16, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 12:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HQ-4-TranKhanhDu.jpg

Works of the South Vietnamese Government do not automatically qualify for PD. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 00:19, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 12:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HQ-5-TranBinhTrong.jpg

Works of the South Vietnamese Government do not automatically qualify for PD. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 00:19, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not old enough for {{PD-Vietnam}} -Nard the Bard 00:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 12:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cash_in_a_Flash_in_slow_Times_free_DVD_Offer.png

Corrupt file, not a .png. -Nard the Bard 00:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ■ MMXX ^talk 06:51, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. You can mark these for speedy delete... J.smith (talk) 01:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1261373182_ECDF4D.jpg

Bad quality due to the motion blur; will soon be orphaned as the person in the image isn't notable (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikey jay). Zvn (talk) 05:10, 26 December 2009 (UTC) Delete - Jmabel ! talk 00:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. J.smith (talk) 01:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baumeisterbuch_1862_102.png

double - there is a PDF with same content, see File:BLV 064 Endres Tuchers Baumeisterbuch der Stadt Nuernberg.pdf --Havang(nl) (talk) 13:55, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This could be used in an infobox article on the book, which would be harder to do with a pdf. -Nard the Bard 18:58, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This seems like a sensible reason for keeping File:Baumeisterbuch_1862_002.png, but not for keeping these PNGs of interior pages, given that the PDF exists. Besides, PDFs can be thumbnailed too, these days.
  See, PDFs can be thumbnailed too.
  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 11:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Nard. - Jmabel ! talk 00:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - as far as I understand, the data for wikisource are organized in a manner, that the first pages of a book are useful as jpg-files, but not the other - look at this category, so this (and 4-5 other files from keichwa) will be useless. - If there are appropriate categories, I will not object to keep it. I try to reach the uploader. Cholo Aleman (talk) 10:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- We have a lot of books in their entirety, especially in German. - Jmabel ! talk 01:37, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. J.smith (talk) 01:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baumeisterbuch_1862_101.png

double, same content as PDF, see File:BLV 064 Endres Tuchers Baumeisterbuch der Stadt Nuernberg.pdf Cholo Aleman (talk) 06:32, 26 December 2009 (UTC) Keep per Nard's rationale on similar image (PDFs are always inconvenient for transclusion). - Jmabel ! talk 00:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. J.smith (talk) 01:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baumeisterbuch_1862_100.png

double, same content as PDF, see File:BLV 064 Endres Tuchers Baumeisterbuch der Stadt Nuernberg.pdf Cholo Aleman (talk) 06:33, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Nard's rationale on similar image (PDFs are always inconvenient for transclusion). - Jmabel ! talk 00:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. J.smith (talk) 01:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baumeisterbuch_1862_000.png

double - there is a PDF with same content, see File:BLV 064 Endres Tuchers Baumeisterbuch der Stadt Nuernberg.pdf Havang(nl) (talk) 14:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Nard's rationale on similar image (PDFs are always inconvenient for transclusion). - Jmabel ! talk 01:00, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. J.smith (talk) 01:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Colonel_Aureliano_Buendía.jpg

Joke? - copyrights?? - literary figure of garcia marquez Cholo Aleman (talk) 06:58, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its a joke, delete it.

Delete - Jmabel ! talk 00:37, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. J.smith (talk) 18:13, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La_capilla_1.jpg

derivative work, advertisement for an unnotable band/DJ, unclear even via google Cholo Aleman (talk) 07:10, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. J.smith (talk) 18:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2TupacShakur2.jpg

Wax sculptures are sculptures and are subject to copyright. Photos of wax sculptures are derivative works. This image is possibly unfree. --Karppinen (talk) 22:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No FOP in Las Vegas. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Jmabel ! talk 01:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - please no more statues and wax scuptures, it's embarrassing. Qlazarus (talk) 06:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)173.183.14.184 06:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Delete. It's not even a photo of him. Perhaps I should have made this issue with using this photo for his personal photo on his Wikipedia entry, but deleting it from the commons would resolve this as well. Morde (talk) 10:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, per Pieter Kuiper. The United States does not have FOP for sculptures. It is a derivative work. –blurpeace ^(talk) 03:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Urbano.jpg

Own work by the uploader? Most likely not! Image nust be deleted. User uploader doesn't have the right to release this photo in the public domain! 93.211.68.169 12:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & this sort of thing casts doubt on everything this uploader claims as own work. - Jmabel ! talk 00:51, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If you have a free source for this then take it, but if not, leave this alone,Openskye2 (talk) 01:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 08:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Coronel_morales.jpg

Own work by the uploader? Most likely not! Image nust be deleted. User uploader doesn't have the right to release this photo under a GNU licence! 93.211.68.169 12:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete obviously a wrong declaration, year is unclear Cholo Aleman (talk) 13:45, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & this sort of thing casts doubt on everything this uploader claims as own work. -- Jmabel ! talk 00:52, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 08:33, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Accion_lago_ilmen.jpg

Own work by the uploader? Most likely not! Image nust be deleted. User uploader doesn't have the right to release this photo under a GNU licence! 93.211.68.169 12:24, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & this sort of thing casts doubt on everything this uploader claims as own work. - Jmabel ! talk 00:52, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If you have a free source for this then take it, but if not, leave this alone, I need it for an upcoming project.Openskye2 (talk) 01:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 08:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jose_Otero_de_Arce.jpg

Own work by the uploader? Most likely not! Image nust be deleted. User uploader doesn't have the right to release this photo under a GNU licence! 93.211.68.169 12:25, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & this sort of thing casts doubt on everything this uploader claims as own work. - Jmabel ! talk 00:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If you have a free source for this then take it, but if not, leave this alone.Openskye2 (talk) 01:19, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 08:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pei_pyramid_at_dusk.jpg

The architect of this building is still alive. Since there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, it is not allowed to publish pictures of the Louvre Pyramid under a free licence. Croquant (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Violates COM:FOP#France--Civa (talk) 21:58, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deleted: copyright violation through lack of Freedom of Panorama in France. Rama (talk) 19:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Crazypersoncarnaval.jpg

nonsense, clearly out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 13:41, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, useless. - Jmabel ! talk 00:57, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Pruneau^talk 10:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Constantin_xypas.png

unusable, there is a MUCH better photo of him Cholo Aleman (talk) 14:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

comment: the better foto is File:Constantin Xypas 2007-4.JPG Cholo Aleman (talk) 14:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Harmless. It's a different photo. Assuming rights are OK, no reason to delete. - Jmabel ! talk 01:02, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CommentIt is harmless, but unusable - I think it is even in the interest of the uploader to delete it, it is like a test Cholo Aleman (talk) 23:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, appears to be cropped and resized from this image on this page, which says "Copyright © 1996 EGLISE ORTHODOXE DE FRANCE". Also practically useless due to very low resolution and bad angle. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 12:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the fact that it is cropped raises doubts, if the other better foto File:Constantin Xypas 2007-4.JPG will be cropped too - there are no metadata of the file Cholo Aleman (talk) 10:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio: Copyright violation: cropped from http://orthodoxie.free.fr/atelier_st_luc_st_aubin.htm

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VienbaotangmythuatVietNam.jpg

Works of the Government of Vietnam are not automatically public domain. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 19:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No author info, no indication this is PD. -Nard the Bard 19:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Blurpeace 05:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thanghen.jpg

Works of the Vietnamese Government are not automatically PD upon creation. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 19:13, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No adequate reason for PD given. -Nard the Bard 19:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Blurpeace 05:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Bot2

We don't need templates for simple image syntax, unused. --The Evil IP address (talk) 16:18, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. I think this was created for Commons:Journal which has been dead for ever (and I subst'd the uses already). Rocket000 (talk) 07:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carlos_Andrés_Pérez_1.jpg

untrustworthy flickr stream, likely copyvio Mangostar (talk) 10:54, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless original source identified & checks out OK, untrusted Flick stream is not an adequate source for this. - Jmabel ! talk 00:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. NW (Talk) 18:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shuttle-Mir_Patch_(Large).svg

Badly traced SVG; superseded by File:Shuttle-Mir_Patch.svg at the Graphic Lab; PNG and JPEG also exist at higher quality. ZooFari 17:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd mark it as {{Superseded}} but see no reason to delete. - Jmabel ! talk 01:06, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there's no need to keep this. Colds7ream (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, useless except as an illustration of how not to trace an SVG. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 13:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. NW (Talk) 18:33, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Biobrick_PCR.jpg

looks like vandalism image Havang(nl) (talk) 21:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image looks like legitimate genome science stuff, but uploaded description looks like pure vandal stuff, so presume not own work and delete. - Jmabel ! talk 01:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, scan of hand-drawn notes, unlikely to have educational use due to low quality. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 13:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - vandalism, see descripion Cholo Aleman (talk) 11:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. NW (Talk) 18:33, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Medina_Angarita_1.jpg

LOC says rights status not evaluated, see http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/cph.3b33938 Mangostar (talk) 10:58, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Clearly not PD-USGov as claimed, so current licensing is invalid. Right status not evaluated. Martin H. (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marcos_Pérez_Jiménez_2.jpg

supposedly public domain because included in a press kit - not really how press kits work, and the source for this isn't really specified anyways Mangostar (talk) 11:00, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. And the Venezuelan Government is obviosly not a part of the US federal governemnt as the uploader claimes with PD-USGov, or is it? Martin H. (talk) 16:54, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Raúl_Leoni_Otero.jpg

same as above Mangostar (talk) 11:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. per nom, not public domain, especially not under PD-USGov. --Martin H. (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Luis_Herrera_Campins_and_Rafael_Caldera.jpg

almost all of this uploader's files are copyvios, typically taken from corbis and credited to the US govt instead. most he originally finds in a separate wiki, here this photo can be found there and is credited to corbis: http://venciclopedia.com/index.php?title=Archivo:Luis_Herrera_Campins_Rafael_Caldera.jpg. I can't find this photo in the corbis archive but I have found it being used by a newspaper (later than this upload date though) Mangostar (talk) 11:10, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating File:Rafael Caldera.jpg for the same reason. Mangostar (talk) 11:12, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Corbis image. --Martin H. (talk) 16:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Пирамида_вид_изнутри.JPG

This is duplicate image Филиппыч (talk) 13:41, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then use {{Duplicate}} and indicate where is the other version instead of bringing it to DR. - Jmabel ! talk 00:58, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Exact or scaled down duplicate: File:Энергетическая пирамида вид изнутри.JPG -- Common Good (talk) 20:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beagle3.jpg

useless design Havang(nl) (talk) 15:57, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless a good explanation is forthcoming why it should be kept. - Jmabel ! talk 01:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Out of COM:PS -- Common Good (talk) 20:52, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bio_BMA.jpg

autopromotion Havang(nl) (talk) 20:56, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, out of scope on several counts. - Jmabel ! talk 01:14, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 11:44, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Out of COM:PS -- Common Good (talk) 20:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Signal6ma.png

Own work by the uploader? Most likely not! Image nust be deleted. User uploader doesn't have the right to release this photo in the public domain! 93.211.68.169 12:24, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & this sort of thing casts doubt on everything this uploader claims as own work. - Jmabel ! talk 00:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Not "own work" by the uploader. --High Contrast (talk) 23:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Obispoinstrucciones.png

The extremely low image resolution, the lack of EXIF data and the fact that the uploader is a well known copyright violator on Commons and on es:wiki, it is unlikely that this image is the own work of User:Jtspotau. 93.211.68.169 12:28, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete given clearly false claims of other images as "own work" by this uploader. - Jmabel ! talk 00:54, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 23:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Copiadep8180337tb5.jpg

Own work by the uploader? Most likely not! Image nust be deleted. User uploader doesn't have the right to release this photo in the public domain! 93.211.68.169 12:29, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & this sort of thing casts doubt on everything this uploader claims as own work. - Jmabel ! talk 00:55, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 23:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Uwe_Greßmann,_Schilda_Komplex_1998.jpg

File is beyond PD-ineligible. Artistic work is evident in the cover Tarawneh (talk) 10:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This image only consists of simple shapes and text. They do not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and are therefore public domain.

NB: The book and its cover was published by the German publisher Galrev Druck- u. V.-G. This is an applied art where there is a significant higher threshold of originality in Germany.--Darldarl (talk) 10:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Book cover, obviously above the threshold of originality. (Practically any masterpiece of visual art may end up simplified to "simple shapes and text", given the will to belittle its value and qualities...) The file itself is of rather low quality to serve its illustrative purpose. The uploader himself has long record of copyright violations. →Spiritia 23:27, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Individual book covers are rather works of art than industrial design (Geschmacksmuster), they are not intended only to serve to the mass sale of all products of the publisher, to make it recognizable and to outdistance the competitors. Thus, the image is over the threshold of originality, much over the typical book cover; if copyrighted, it could not monopolize other book covers. Or at least, there are doubts about copyright protection.--Фипс (talk) 02:19, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Beyond PD-ineligible. --High Contrast (talk) 08:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Contest_052.jpg

Picture from a "Vodoo contest", private joke, out of scope Havang(nl) (talk) 14:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this and the other similar images. - Jmabel ! talk 01:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 08:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Contest_049.jpg

Picture from a "Vodoo contest", private joke, out of scope Havang(nl) (talk) 14:05, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unusable, far out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 07:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 08:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Herfst_Bomen-2.JPG

blurred and bad quality, no clear description, unused Cholo Aleman (talk) 14:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Substandard image quality. Not useable for encyclopaedic purposes. --High Contrast (talk) 08:29, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Contest_040.jpg

Picture from a "Vodoo contest", private joke, out of scope Havang(nl) (talk) 14:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete joke, unusable Cholo Aleman (talk) 11:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 08:28, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dec112006.JPG

Out of Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless a good explanation is forthcoming why it should be kept. - Jmabel ! talk 01:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Out of scope. High Contrast (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Primer_info.jpg

Outside project scope. -Nard the Bard 21:15, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image looks like legitimate genome science stuff, but uploaded description looks like pure vandal stuff, so presume not own work and delete. - Jmabel ! talk 01:18, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, scan of hand-drawn notes, unlikely to have educational use due to low quality. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 13:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. High Contrast (talk) 08:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:POMZ.JPEG

I really doubt the uploader is the author, check his user page [1] Avron (talk) 13:30, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE given that history. - Jmabel ! talk 00:57, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bummer, should have looked at the user's homepage before wasting time on figuring out how to import a wp-en image to commons ... --Gms (talk) 13:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Contest_037.jpg

Picture from a "Vodoo contest", private joke, out of scope Havang(nl) (talk) 14:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Branly.JPG

The architect of this building is still alive. Since there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, it is not allowed to publish pictures of the museum itself under a free licence. Croquant (talk) 16:20, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Violates COM:FOP#France--Civa (talk) 22:02, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Musee_du_quai_Branly_-view_from_rear_garden_August_2008_.jpg

The architect of this building is still alive. Since there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, it is not allowed to publish pictures of the museum itself under a free licence. Croquant (talk) 16:25, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this image. I understand User:Croquant's concern, however it is misplaced. Here are the salient facts:

I am the owner the image under discussion, having personally taken the photo;
the photo (image) was first published in the United States of America. Since the copyright laws of France do not apply extra-territorially (and vise-versa) to this image, it was legally published in the U.S.;
thus no laws or regulations of France have been violated.

Thank you for your concern. For further information on this aspect of copyright, please visit Panoramafreiheit -USA. Best: HarryZilber 18:39, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

--------

Gardez cette image. Je comprends inquiétude de User:Croquant cependant, mais elle est déplacée. Voici les faits saillants:

Je suis le propriétaire de l'image en cours de discussion, après avoir personnellement pris la photo;
la photo (image) a d'abord publié aux États-Unis d'Amérique. Depuis les lois de copyright de la France ne s'applique pas extra-territoriale (et vice-versa) à cette image, il a été légalement publiées aux États-Unis;
donc pas des lois ou règlements de la France ont été violés.

Je vous remercie pour votre sollicitude. Pour plus d'informations sur cet aspect du droit d'auteur, s'il vous plaît visitez Panoramafreiheit -USA. Meilleur: HarryZilber 18:39, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Delete : Violates COM:FOP#France. Even if published first in USA, even if it is its own picture and even if no law was violated.--Civa (talk) 21:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Quai_Branly.jpg

The architect of this building is still alive. Since there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, it is not allowed to publish pictures of the museum itself under a free licence. Croquant (talk) 16:29, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Violates COM:FOP#France--Civa (talk) 21:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Louvre_pyramid_+_group_entrance_building.jpg

The architect of this building is still alive. Since there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, it is not allowed to publish pictures of the Louvre Pyramid under a free licence. Croquant (talk) 16:48, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Violates COM:FOP#France--Civa (talk) 21:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Weedmaps_logo_272x73.jpg

Derivative work, passes threshold of individuality. -Nard the Bard 19:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lasvegasgeography.jpg

Works of the Nevada Government are not automatically PD. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 19:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly by this photographer[2]. -Nard the Bard 19:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, but that site states all of his work is under copyright, so I still think it should be deleted. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 03:45, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Villa Rustica Autobahnkreuz Bondorf Lage auf Modell.jpg

Shown architectural model might be copyrighted. --Noddy93 (talk) 19:59, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Villa Rustica Bondorf Modell.jpg

Shown architectural model might be copyrighted. --Noddy93 (talk) 20:03, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it is part of an exhibition in a town hall (Rathaus), so the Freedom of Panorma of Germany applies, as far as I understand Cholo Aleman (talk) 07:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately not: § 59 UrhG states that FOP only applies to "Werke, die sich bleibend an öffentlichen Wegen, Straßen oder Plätzen befinden" (en: "works permanently located in public ways, streets or places") and explicitly restricts the permission for reproduction to the exterior view. --Noddy93 (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

, sorry auf Deutsch: sicher, dass das Innere des Rathauses nicht ein öffentlicher Raum ist? bzw. ein "öffentlicher Platz"? Dazu würde passen, dass das Gesetz es bei der Abbildung von Bauwerken ausdrücklich auf die äußere Ansicht beschränkt, bei der Abbildung von Nicht-Bauwerken an öffentlichen Plätzen ist auch ein Innenraum möglich. Ich frage mal AFBorchert, der scheint Experte für sowas zu sein. Ich bin kein Jurist und bewege mich daher auf glattem und brüchigem Eis - ich habe nur das Gefühl, dass es hier vielen so geht. Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC) (If necessary, I can try to translate it into english.)[reply]

Ja, da bin ich mir sicher. Siehe auch de:Panoramafreiheit#Innenaufnahmen. Grob gesagt: Notwendig für einen öffentlichen Raum ist es, daß man ihn idR 24/7 betreten kann. Gruß, Noddy93 (talk) 21:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the uploader of this image has not been notified yet — I've done this now. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Cholo Aleman (talk) 07:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Velasco Alvarado.jpg

Date given as 1999, which is surely incorrect, but the lifespan of the subject of the image calls the "PD-old" template into question as well --(ESkog)^(Talk) 20:47, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Polarlys: Per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Velasco_Alvarado.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bill_Hunter_bio.pdf

autopromotion Havang(nl) (talk) 21:05, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, out of scope on several counts. - Jmabel ! talk 01:14, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Cholo Aleman (talk) 21:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 21:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Biografía_de_Ricardo_de_Armas.pdf

autopromotion Havang(nl) (talk) 21:11, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, out of scope on several counts. - Jmabel ! talk 01:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Cholo Aleman (talk) 07:37, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 21:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Guillermo_A_Baena_López.pdf

Autopromotion and possibly copyvio logo Havang(nl) (talk) 21:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

delete - Jmabel ! talk 01:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 21:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Board2.JPG

out of project scope Havang(nl) (talk) 22:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline. - Jmabel ! talk 01:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused since 2006 - very small hope that the user will come back and use it, unusable for others, because the context is missing Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mbombela-cut-away.jpg

Likely copyright violation, no evidence the uploader is the creator. ed g2s • talk 12:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 22:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nathanaël_Duluard.JPG

Unused personal picture. ■ MMXX ^talk 06:44, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: it is only one day old - in my opinion we have to wait several days until a deletion request Cholo Aleman (talk) 13:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless either the person is notable or this is self-portrait for user page. - Jmabel ! talk 00:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Justass (talk) 22:47, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Board1.JPG

out of project scope Havang(nl) (talk) 22:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline. - Jmabel ! talk 01:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The written text seems to be out of scope, but the photograph pictures a commonly known whiteboard. It's not the best image we have but it is too good to be deleted. The image is properly categorized. --High Contrast (talk) 10:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - useful image of a whiteboard (non-admin closure). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Haiba.jpg

While images being sent to ibiblio should be in the public domain or be under a free license, there is no assertion that any of the images truly are. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Battrang.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Baotang.jpg for images with the same issue. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 00:09, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's time for a mass ibiblio DR. Seems like that would be a better forum. -Nard the Bard 00:13, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sounds like a good idea. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 00:15, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 17:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:OIF_Cartman.JPG

The file description contains a fair use rationale for the use of the Eric Cartman character from South Park. Fair use does not apply to Commons. I'm not entirely sure the graffiti "artist" made a good enough job to actually call this a derivative work, though. —LX (talk, contribs) 00:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I do not personally view this as a copyright violation but under Commons' strict policies it is. -Nard the Bard 00:54, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The "image" is not an [3] accurate enough depiction of Cartman to be considered a "derivative work". While the image is obviously supposed to be Erik Cartman, it actually isn't Cartman as depicted in its copyright form. Additionally, the image is being used to convey an idea. The message of the graffiti is "Respect my authority", and the Carman likeness is a humorous pop culturally-referenced manner of doing so.Ahodges7 (talk) 13:29, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info This Google Images search should provide a reference for comparison. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:40, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the question here is does a vandal get copyright protection in Iraq? And does Iraq have a freedom of panorama? I couldn't find the answer to either question in my quick searching. --J.smith (talk) 01:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think that this should be a case of freedom of panorama, but it’s obviously a borderline case. --Frakturfreund (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. derivative work Polarlys (talk) 17:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Contraguias.jpg

Personal joke picture, totally unclear (somewhere in latin america), unused Cholo Aleman (talk) 06:41, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Needs description, but lean toward keep: of ethnographic/sociological interest. - Jmabel ! talk 00:28, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
but it is undescribed and it was the only edit of this user (look through the old uncategorized files and you will find many of these cases) Cholo Aleman (talk) 10:02, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I suspect that someone other than the uploader could still say roughly where this is. - Jmabel ! talk 01:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. no source, no description, nothing. We suffer under such party photos. Polarlys (talk) 17:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Praia_da_armação.jpg

unused personal picture. ■ MMXX ^talk 06:41, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lean toward delete, but one could crop the girl out & have a reasonable picture of the place. - Jmabel ! talk 00:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, added to Category:Armação dos Búzios, where we don't seem to have a similar picture yet. (File:DSCN1042.JPG is probably the closest.) —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 12:20, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nao deve ser deletada, a imagen de fundo combina com a jovem que é moradora da cidade. Preferiam uma foto de uma mulher em bikini?

Comment did my best to remove girl, but it's hard to work with so small image -Justass (talk) 23:18, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. with girl: COM:SCOPE, without girl: Fake ;-) Polarlys (talk) 17:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CondeBMcCullough.jpg

Unless we have a date for the photograph, no idea what license it will get. However, with it being a work of a US state, I doubt we can host it here. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 06:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone try to find out Oregon DOT's policies? Some US state & local entities free-license their images or place them in the public domain. For example, the Seattle Municipal Archives have recently been free-licensing thousands of images. But lacking clarity, I agree, we'd have to delete. - Jmabel ! talk 00:35, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 16:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dornier_Do18.jpg

Image would qualify for {{PD-UK-photo-pre-1945}}, but we do not recognize it. This is similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fairey Fox.jpg. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 07:12, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : this is an old plane. In en:wikipedia we read : In Luftwaffe service, it was obsolete by the outbreak of World War II. The last ones where destroyed during WWII. The photo is circa 1935.--Tangopaso (talk) 17:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. most likely not in the PD in the country of creation (Germany) Polarlys (talk) 17:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of Croatian coins and banknotes

File:1 Lipa HR 1993.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:2 Lipe HR 1993.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:5 Lipa HR 1993.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:10 Lipa HR 1993.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:20 Lipa HR 1993.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:50 Lipa HR 1993.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:1 Kuna HR 1993.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:2 Kune HR 1993.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:5 Kuna HR 1993.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:5 Kuna Obljetnica Senjskog misala 200808.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:5 kuna 94 Obljetnica Senjskog misala 200808.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:25 kuna lice.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:25 kuna Podunavlje 1997.JPG.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:25 kuna RH OUN 1997.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:25 kuna Lisabon 1998.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Kuna 5.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Kuna 10.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Kuna 20.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Kuna 50.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:100 kuna.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Kuna 200.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

I believe that User:Cocoloi, User:Roberta F., User:Dijxtra and User:Suradnik13's images are all copyvios because a permission from the National Bank of Croatia is needed. See Article 24 of the Act on the NBC, Official Gazette 75/2007 [4]. --Manu (talk) 06:13, 20 October 2009(UTC)

Keep please see this Reproduction of Croatian currency--Ex13 (talk) 07:13, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reproduction of Croatian currency is too restrictive on usage and derivative works. And also currency is copyrighted by Croatian National Bank. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Croatian copyright lasts 50 years. The permissions given by the Croatian authorities are too restrictive for the Commons. --Simonxag (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User Mvllez wrote on my talkpage that he asked for the written permission of the Croatian National Bank, and he's waiting for that approval. Can we wait a little bit (1 month) to get that permission?--Ex13 (talk) 13:32, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

Szajci ^reci 13:35, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Stifle (talk) 19:45, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images uploaded by User:Msfortunevelasco

File:Beaalonzodr.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Darna0102.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Darnascoco.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Darna0101.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Darnanimarian.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Marianrivera66darna.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Christinekorea09.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Yas.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:HPIM2192 modified.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Possible copyright violation, no proper source. ■ MMXX ^talk 07:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Presume copyvio unless explanation forthcoming. - Jmabel ! talk 00:44, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--Motopark (talk) 07:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Random image collection from all over the web -Justass (talk) 02:03, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Q_burqa.jpg

took it off facebook Mary (talk) 20:31, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Q_burqa.jpg

taken off facebook 58.181.109.195 20:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VERY WEIRD here. See history of this deletion request, note anonymous IP altering signature initially given. Note also that the person who initially requested deletion here on the bases "took it off facebook" was the initial uploader. - Jmabel ! talk 01:13, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I contribute on Wikipedia, anyway a friend asked me if I could help with deleting this photo, so i signed on to Wikimedia to make a comment here (well I was going to set up an account at some point anyway). The situation i have been told is this: the picture was uploaded as a joke, and the girl whose picture it is wants it removed. M Alan Kazlev (talk) 01:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- nevertheless this deletion request is made on false reasons ("taken from facebook" - obviously wrong) Cholo Aleman (talk) 11:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. not used, confusing situation. Polarlys (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peter_Hacks_-_Lieder,_Briefe,_Gedichte_1974.jpg

File is beyond PD-ineligible. Artistic work is evident in the cover Tarawneh (talk) 10:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a applied art where we have a significant higher threshold of originality in Germany. Please be refered to the decision on 26 January 2005 by the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany (BVerfG). Please note that this book and this cover was published by the German publisher Neues Leben in Berlin (DDR). --AFBorchert (talk) 13:12, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've updated the German publisher and the year as, according to the cited source, this is a book cover published in 1984 by another publisher — but also in Berlin, Germany. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep pd-ineligible. -Nard the Bard 17:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep pd-text. ---85.130.44.190 21:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, per AFBorchert. Kameraad Pjotr 20:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Рис_3.1.jpg

Russian government artworks are not covered by the PD-exempt licence (Commons:Copyright_tags#Russia_and_former_Soviet_Union). Panther (talk) 09:45, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:Рис.0.jpg, File:Рис.3.2.jpg, File:Рис. 3.6.jpg, File:Damage to the Sayano-Shushinskaya power station.jpg, File:Рис.3.3..jpg, File:Рис 3.4.png. --Panther (talk) 09:51, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Напишу по-русски! С чего бы их удалять? На каком основании, хотя с частью согласен, надо оставить File:Рис 3.1.jpg, File:Рис.3.2.jpg, File:Рис.3.3..jpg и File:Рис 3.4.png. Помоему у этих файлах вполне приемлемая лицензия. Dark Andrew 15:32, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

«Художественные работы государственных органов России не находятся в общественном достоянии и под действие лицензии PD-RU-exempt не попадают». --Panther (talk) 11:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

English: But this (and other) images in this request are not independent "artworks", they are an integral part of the official document (archived on wikisource) of the government agency Rosnadzor (aka w:Federal Service for Ecological, Technological and Nuclear Supervision) and should not be treated as separate images! And that falls under PD-exempt:

Русский: Я настаиваю, что эти файлы не являются независимыми "художественными работами", а являются неотъемлемой частью Акта расследования причин аварии (см. ссылку), составленного Федеральной службой Ростехандзора. А такие документы являются PD.

“

official documents of state government agencies and local government agencies of municipal formations, including laws, other legal texts, judicial decisions, other materials of legislative, administrative and judicial character, official documents of international organizations, as well as their official translations

”

-- Wesha (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

“

including laws, other legal texts, judicial decisions, other materials of legislative, administrative and judicial character

”

.

Уже сто раз обсуждалось. В ОД только государственная символика и тексты. Не тратьте время. --Panther (talk) 22:31, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ссылку в студию, пожалуйста. Please provide a prooflink to that discussion. -- Wesha (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. including, not only. There's a substantial difference, you know. -- Wesha (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Including exactly means only here. Please do not create your own theories where all things are already determined ages ago. --Panther (talk) 09:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We must not provide prooflink, that this work is not PD. You must provide prooflink, that this work is PD. The work is copyrighted until the freedom will be proved. In other words - plz, prove that this document has got legislative, administrative and judicial character. Alex Spade (talk) 14:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. (1) Yes, not only state symbols are PD-RU-exempt, but some images in official docs are also PD-RU-exempt( for example - figures in Положение "О квалификационных испытаниях на право ношения крапового берета" or road signs in the Rule of the Road (Правила дорожного движения)). BUT
(2) The works created by official agencies are not always official works. Yes, this work was created by official agency, but it is not official work (in the terms of Russian copyright law), because this work hasn't got legislative, administrative and judicial character. Alex Spade (talk) 14:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Define "administrative" character. Well, honestly, until we get a lawyer to chime in here, we'll be running around in circles. -- Wesha (talk) 15:39, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We are discussing images here. Could you please prove what these images (made earlier by an unknown author, obviously not for the discussed document) have the "administrative" character. --Panther (talk) 16:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The translation of the copyright law may be poor, in which case this could be reopened, but these images are certainly within the English meaning of "administrative" and, therefore, PD, according to our English summary of the law. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2009/12/26

Images of Croatian coins and banknotes

Images uploaded by User:Msfortunevelasco

Navigation menu

Search