Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2009/11/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
I can't see the image on the source page, and the copyright notice on the page is quite clear- "All content © 2009, Army Times Publishing Company" J Milburn (talk) 16:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept. As a work of the United States federal government, this image is in the public domain. The copyright notice of one of many organizations republishing the image is irrelevant, so this nomination was based upon a misunderstanding. I've updated the description to cite the government publication from which the image originally was obtained. —David Levy 19:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
{{PD-AR-Photo}} is not applicable, it is not a photograph. Eusebius (talk) 12:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Keep. This image is a photograph.ferbr1 (talk) 14:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. This image is a photograph.--Roblespepe (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it is not a photograph but a graphic work derived from a photograph, apparently, but after reading the original version of the law, it appears that it is not about photographs, but photographical works. I guess it can apply here, so I change my vote to Keep (closing admins hate me). --Eusebius (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it is not a photograph but a graphic work derived from a photograph, apparently, but after reading the original version of the law, it appears that it is not about photographs, but photographical works. I guess it can apply here, so I change my vote to
Kept. Withdrawn by nominator. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:30, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
File:OQAAAPaVpareMuK78MRSIH9AKWQXGbqq38CPudVkgaONbJSIWw-68SCO6p9oMRRkuRmVxNd9B9gjtx9RN3iAYSQxU4QAm1T1ULCoKryp3WuQRUYNz3tP-lPNEJzD.jpg
[edit]
Non-authorized caption from TV or videogame and posted on orkut. Nor even the author knows the source of the image. It has Ben 10's logo, and it is not allowed. Yanguas (talk) 14:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete screenshot with no license. --Simonxag (talk) 02:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted Infrogmation (talk) 05:54, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The photographer will not give permission for it's use here. :-( Minicruller (talk) 17:41, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete The uploader is requesting deletion on the same day as upload. Irrespective of any other considerations, I think we should take the upload as a mistake. --Simonxag (talk) 02:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. by Túrelio (talk · contribs). Coyau (talk) 16:49, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Duplicate of File:Motorcycle ambulance Popular Mechanics v. 30 - 1918 page 165 a.jpg --Dbratland (talk) 17:38, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Reverted to the first revision, which is not a duplicate of File:Motorcycle ambulance Popular Mechanics v. 30 - 1918 page 165 a.jpg. –Tryphon☂ 14:17, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Out of scope. Eusebius (talk) 08:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Uploader was asked already October 25th, whether he has "written permission by the subject shown in this image", but did never reply. So likely, he has not. Privacy violation and unusable. --Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and privacy issues. --Simonxag (talk) 01:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: out of scope (unused)
out of scope (unused) Plrk (talk) 12:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Justass (talk) 22:30, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete unused personal image --Simonxag (talk) 01:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: out of scope (unused)
No Freedom of Panorama in France Triwbe (talk) 21:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 02:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: copyvio - no FOP in France
out of scope (not realistically useful for an educational purpose) Plrk (talk) 12:39, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 02:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: out of scope (unused)
This is a photo of myself I uploaded 3 years ago, therefore it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Moloch981 (talk) 15:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete only used on uploader/proposer's userpage. --Simonxag (talk) 02:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: Uploader request: uploader asked for deletion; not used and thereby out of scope
This is a photo of myself I uploaded 3 years ago, therefore it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Moloch981 (talk) 15:32, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom, though I don't know why you haven't taken it off your userpage. --Simonxag (talk) 02:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by D-Kuru: Uploader request: uploader asked for deletion; not used and thereby out of scope
- Found in "Copyright violation" with rationale Suspected copyvio. Needs to be solved at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Add_color_to_the_drawing. I do not see the reason, while this is derivation of PD image. --Zirland (talk) 11:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- EDIT: Oh, I am sorry to say that, but if you accidentally used the texture of copyrighted image, then your derived work it is not free now. I am afraid it will need to be done again and correctly. --Snek01 (talk) 10:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think it is a copyvio problem (then again, I am not an expert on the subject). I did use the texture from the pdf as a basis but have a close look at the two pics. Could you tell I did? All the scratches are gone. Some parts I had to recolor completely because they didn't match (like the 'bump' on the right). So, it wasn't just copy and paste. I used the texture as a start and then drew on top of it. I think if you would recolor it from scratch you would arrive pretty much at the same result (only that it'd take much longer). Splette (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete From what I can see uploader took part of copyrighted photo and photoshoped it to match blank shell picture. But before any decision we may want to wait for responses from WP:MCQ --Justass (talk) 21:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Zirland: In category Copyright violations; no license
Wrong photo, not the pteronura brasilensis as described. Will upload the correct photo but no need for this one. --Bobjgalindo 01:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Nominated for deletion by uploader just 7 minutes after initial upload, should be considered an honest mistake. -- IANEZZ (talk) 08:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete This picture has no education value (COM:PS), and deletion requested by uploaer in good faith. Inductiveload (talk) 02:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
A image listed for "badjpeg" and has the flag in a wrong ratio. The image is unused on all projects. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:20, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Normally superseded by SVG is not a reson for deletion, but since this is incorrect and extremely low quality, and has a better replacement, I would say we can delete it. Inductiveload (talk) 02:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Copyvio - Template:PD-RussiaExempt does not apply to this non-governmental medal Óðinn (talk) 07:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination. --russavia (talk) 09:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Not appropiated for Wikimedia Josimas (talk) 08:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete Unused personal artwork. Deletion requested by uploader. --Simonxag (talk) 01:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:45, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
MOTER BOARD PARTS NAME --110.36.9.13 Correct malformed DR.--Captain-tucker (talk) 14:55, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not quite sure what that deletion request reason is meant to mean, but if it is about the copyright printed on individual components such as the intergrated circuits, then the copyright is not about the text, or even shape of the IC (which is a international standard) but it is a copyright on the photographic 'mask' patterns used to produce the circuits on the silicon die within the plastic IC packages (which is of course not being copied here). --Tony Wills (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep nothing copyrightable here. --Dschwen (talk) 22:12, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Not an artwork. --Simonxag (talk) 02:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Functional objects are not subject to copyright, and any copyrightable text or logos here are so small that they are de minimis. Nohing to copyright here. Inductiveload (talk) 02:10, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
out of scope (not realistically useful for an educational purpose) Plrk (talk) 12:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Keep Useful and unusual photo of found naturally occurring religious image. Islam may not be superstitious that way, but in some religions cults form around these things. --Simonxag (talk) 02:01, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Could you enlighten me as how to this image could realistically be useful? Even if someone were to educate about cults forming around funny-shaped cornflakes or divine brinjals (which is highly doubtful even that!), just about any picture would be more useful than this low-res, blurry, crap. Or what am I missing? Plrk (talk) 13:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Occasionally the image of something religious (usually the Virgin Mary) appears "miraculously" in a water stain on a subway wall or in a cut potato. These things appear when they appear, (except of course in Ireland where the Catholic Church has tried and tested techniques for producing them). Someone has photographed the phenomenon and released it under a free license. Hallelujah! --Simonxag (talk) 17:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept, illustration of common folk religious phenomenon thus in scope; Commons is not censored for religious belief. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
This is a photo of myself I uploaded 3 years ago, therefore it isnot realistically useful for an educational purpose Moloch981 (talk) 15:28, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Keep used --Simonxag (talk) 02:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Where? It's on my user page but I can delete it immediately: I don't really know how to request a file deletion since I don't log in at Commons very often. --Moloch981 (talk) 14:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Its in the gallery on it:Wikipedia:Wikipediani/Per immagine. If you view the image page for an image and click on the "Check usage" button (top, middle right), you can see where the image is being used. --Simonxag (talk) 17:44, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ok you're right. I have nominated 3 other files for deletion but I don't see them on this page: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moloch981 Piddu family.JPG, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taverna del Grifo, 4 giugno 2006 (3).JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taverna del Grifo, 4 giugno 2006 (2).JPG, is everything OK? --Moloch981 (talk) 21:07, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Its in the gallery on it:Wikipedia:Wikipediani/Per immagine. If you view the image page for an image and click on the "Check usage" button (top, middle right), you can see where the image is being used. --Simonxag (talk) 17:44, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted per COM:SCOPE.--Trixt (talk) 01:30, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
No source. -Nard the Bard 22:11, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
False license - the artist died 1946. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:49, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, not yet PD in country of origin. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Commons has plenty of those. Wutsje (talk) 23:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, low quality by any standard, not usefull in any educational context. --Martin H. (talk) 00:41, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Huib talk 12:32, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
not original flag --Basitraja Correct malformed DR. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:00, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment Don't see the problem and I find it bad to reupload a complete different flag which is the case here. Please specify the problem about the deletion request. En still uses the old flag. Besides or prior to the deletion debate, we need opinions of flag experts, too. --Mattes (talk) 15:33, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Abigor: No license
Out of project scope Justass (talk) 21:32, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete You can play an amusing game with this one of trying to count the number of different copyright violations. --Simonxag (talk) 02:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted by Martin H.: No license since 6 November 2009
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
图形上方文字不雅。There're filthy Chinese characters “日民眾” on the flag, has a big difference from the right one “國民黨”. --Jimmy xu wrk (talk) 12:05, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- And, if I recall, the sun is not pointing upwards. Do you have a link to the actual real flag? User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality, out of scope. Much better quality at File:Flag of the Republic of China-Nanjing (Naval Jack).svg. -Nard the Bard 22:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete (uploader) Agreed on all points.--SelfQ (talk) 22:54, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted / Redundant and request by uploader--Fanghong (talk) 08:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope (not realistically useful for an educational purpose). also, the stated "date" seems false. Plrk (talk) 12:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 02:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted / Low res and no used --Fanghong (talk) 08:09, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
What is it good for? Hydro 08:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC) Correct malformed DR --Captain-tucker (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, no reason for deletion given. Appears to be a legitimate photo gallery. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:30, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- But it's content is quasi identical to it's category. --Hydro (talk) 19:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- As Inductiveload said, that doesn't necessarily mean the gallery must be removed. It might work to merge/redirect the gallery, but I don't really see how it's needed. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:56, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- But it's content is quasi identical to it's category. --Hydro (talk) 19:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep There is no consensus on gallery vs. category (COM:GALLERY). The page is categorised properly, and may in future have more useful content, if someone with knowledge would organise the churches properly. In the meantime, we can leave it be. − Inductiveload (talk) 02:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept. COM:G, legitimate use of gallery. --Martin H. (talk) 03:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- also: File:Skopje Aqueduct 2008.jpg
- also: File:Stara carshija.jpg
Original en-wiki uploader, en:User:Polibiush, was recently blocked as a serial copyright offender; all of his image uploads are likely copyvios. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Update: Admins, please note talk page discussion with IP stating to be the true copyright owner of File:Skopje Aqueduct 2008.jpg (Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:Bitola center.jpg) Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete all. Skopje Aqueduct 2008.jpg can be restored/reuploaded if the license at Flickr is changed, or the ip otherwise identifies themselves as the true owner. Finn Rindahl (talk) 23:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 07:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in France, architect Auguste Perret and painter Henri Matisse died in 1954. Coyau (talk) 16:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 02:21, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- I got notified, but i'm NOT the author. Author is de:Benutzer:Matthias Holländer, this is only an edited version of de:Datei:Chapelledurosaire.jpg. --Nyks (talk) 07:04, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete, obviously. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 15:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 07:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in France Triwbe (talk) 21:34, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 02:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 07:59, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in France Triwbe (talk) 21:33, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 02:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 07:59, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in France Triwbe (talk) 21:33, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 02:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 07:59, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Luce died 1941. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 08:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Images of Flag of the Kingman Reef
[edit]- File:Flag_of_Kingman_Reef.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Flag_of_Kingman_Reef_2.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Forgive me if I am doing this wrong - I work on deletion on Wikipedia but have never done this here before. The two files are substantially identical, so one of them should go anyway, but that is not the main problem.This wrong file on Commons has been the subject of discussion on the Flags of the World website and mailing list: this is not the flag - official or unofficial - of the Kingman Reef. The Kingman Reef has no flag; this is simply the signal flag "K". It has most likely been taken from the vexilla-mundi website [1], where - if you click on the index letter "K" at the bottom of the menu screen, you get this signal flag followed by a list of entries beginning with K (the third of which is Kingman Reef). Grutness (talk) 22:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- AFAIK it is not a reason, that a flag is a fantasy flag, although this could lead to wrong entries in Wikipedia. But the flag was taken without liscence from vexilla-mundi. That is a copyright violation and request a speedy deletion. --Patrick (talk) 17:54, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Kept: If the filename is misleading, you can have the file renamed and the resulting redirect deleted. This is not a reason to delete the file as such. Closing this discussion and adding {{Rename}}. -- User:Docu at 12:55, 19 November 2009 (UTC)}}:
- Post closure -- I deleted the redirects as nothing linked to them. One of the flags was a copyvio, and it is also deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Images of Marrovi
[edit]- File:Flag of State of Mexico.PNG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Guanajuato propuesta en 2009.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Guanajuato (1996-1998).png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Tabasco prouesta en 2009.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera propuesta para Tabasco 2009.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Felipe Carrillo Puerto (Quintana Roo).png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Tulum.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Solidaridad (Quintana Roo).png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Flag of Chihuahua City.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Flag of La Paz BCS.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera propuesta de Jalisco.PNG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Hidalgo.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Puebla.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Morelos.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Guanajuato.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Nayarit.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Sinaloa.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de San Luis Potosí.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Zacatecas.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Querétaro.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Colima.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Aguascalientes.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Durango.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera Purépecha (civil).png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Baja California Sur.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Tabasco.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Veracruz.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera del Estado de México.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Michoacán de Ocampo.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Chihuahua.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Guerrero.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Quintana Roo.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Michoacán.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Jalisco.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Chiapas.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de La Paz (Baja California Sur).PNG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Flag of José María Morelos (Quintana Roo).PNG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera del Puerto de Veracruz.PNG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Flag of Morelia.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Campeche.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stateflag of Nuevo León.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Municipality flag of Merida (Mexico).png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Flag State of Mexico (new).png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera Edo Mexico.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit){kind=link}
.png&diff=0){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
.png&action=watch){kind=link}
.png&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=purge){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.png&action=delete){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit){kind=link}
.png&diff=0){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
.png&action=watch){kind=link}
.png&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=purge){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.png&action=delete){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit){kind=link}
.png&diff=0){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
.png&action=watch){kind=link}
.png&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=purge){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.png&action=delete){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit){kind=link}
.png&diff=0){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
.png&action=watch){kind=link}
.png&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=purge){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.png&action=delete){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit){kind=link}
.PNG&diff=0){kind=link}
.PNG&action=history){kind=link}
.PNG&action=watch){kind=link}
.PNG&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=purge){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.PNG&action=delete){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit){kind=link}
.PNG&diff=0){kind=link}
.PNG&action=history){kind=link}
.PNG&action=watch){kind=link}
.PNG&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=purge){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.PNG&action=delete){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit){kind=link}
.png&diff=0){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
.png&action=watch){kind=link}
.png&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=purge){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.png&action=delete){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit){kind=link}
.png&diff=0){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
.png&action=watch){kind=link}
.png&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=purge){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.png&action=delete){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Kept. in use in scope Huib talk 12:37, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- A lot of these were subsequently deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags by Manuel Rodríguez Villegas. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
"free" but not free in the freedomdefined.org sense. Terms of use do not allow competing image repositories to store these. -Nard the Bard 22:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- According to the website I took the picture from (http://www.clipartdb.com/): ClipartDB offers thousands of free cliparts and graphics that you can use in any application such as microsoft office (word, excel, powerpoint), open office or on your website and weblog. Our Free Cliparts can be downloaded free. Feel free to browse the various clipart categories and enjoy these clipart graphics! Wikimedia Commons is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, so they can use it on their website, which is this website.Mariah-Yulia (talk) 22:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- That's not totally clear licensewise. For one thing it's not stated that you can modify the clipart itself as well as use it. --Simonxag (talk) 02:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep --minhhuy*= (talk) 07:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. All the website stated is that they are free to use, but nothing else. There is also no statement of where the images came from and only just uploaders. We need more specific information to keep files like these. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 23:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I want to delete this account --Tavon36 Correct malformed DR. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment Unused photo apparently taken in a private place without explicit authorization, and it's the only upload by the user. OTOH, the subject seems to be a poet/novelist that published some works (see here), so it could be in scope. -- IANEZZ (talk) 08:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep At least four books by this author [2], but I couldn't find any other image of this person to verify identity. --Justass (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep No privacy issues that I can see: the subject is posing for her photograph. Published author, so notable. Her identity can be verified form this [3]. The uploader added this image almost 2 months ago. I think that's a bit long for us to assume a mistake. Would they please explain their reasons for deletion? --Simonxag (talk) 00:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
![[3]](http://farm1.static.flickr.com/117/315174401_88124a19bc.jpg){kind=link}
Kept, per Simonxag. Kameraad Pjotr 20:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Personal picture. Unused. Not a portrait just a shot. Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 22:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- Comment My fault. I didn't check the picture status. Didn't know its deletion was discussed before. Just cleaning categories in the uncategorized hell: all the flesh is gone, just bones and crap left. Anyway, it's a border line picture for me.--Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 22:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Category added per previous discussion. Infrogmation (talk) 00:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete go ahead and kill it, by request, and because it's still not in use.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:12, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Kept. per previous discussion. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
TinEye brings some hits here that might indicate that the image is taken from somewhere else - at least the image was published elsewhere. Most interesting is the sanned image http://img13.nnm.ru/imagez/gallery/3/a/0/8/d/3a08d50ac440619ae2baa287f68cbce8_full.jpg. Also http://uk.real.com/music/artist/The_Ramones/gallery/image/13234/ is an interesting hit. --Martin H. (talk) 03:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Also the other uploads from Oldpunk on en.wikipedia:
- File:DDRamone.JPG has a strange TinEye hit of a larger image showing the whole person
- File:Ramones-1978byoldpunk.jpg has nothing, but given the different quality of this three images it is unlikely from the same author but taken from somewhere.
--Martin H. (talk) 03:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 20:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Missing evidence of permission tag was removed by IP, taking this here. Allowing usage "for Wikipedia" is not enough, evidence of a specific free license is required. Hekerui (talk) 11:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- That IP was mine... I didn't realize I was not logged in. Beyond publishing the email conversation I had with Joey Harrison where he gave his permission for this image to appear on Wikimedia, I have no further ability to establish the image's license. Instead, I have contacted Joey Harrison to request of him one of two actions: to release the three original Flickr images under CCSA license (or similar) or to upload the triple image to his Flickr account and release that under similar license. Binksternet (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, lacks suitable permission. (OTRS) Kameraad Pjotr 20:22, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
out of scope (not realistically useful for an educational purpose). unused low-quality picture of an amateur band. Plrk (talk) 12:39, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep band already released one album [4] --Justass (talk) 22:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, out of project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 20:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Incompatible licensing. File:Brain stem normal human.svg is used and is only licensed under CC-by-sa 2.5, thus it is impossible to license this as GFDL. The brain image needs to be changed or the author of the brain image asked to put the image under GFDL or, even better, CC-by-sa 3.0. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:54, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 20:34, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Läuger died 1952. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 19:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Zuloaga died 1945. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:22, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete Ok, you are right, still in copyright. But this just an extraction from another image, which is kept... I should really check the dates before I do some extraction work, of course,... Frédéric (talk) 18:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 19:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Photos of Monument to the Conquerors of Space
[edit]- File:Monument to Soviet cosmonauts.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Monument to the Conquerors of Space.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Russia space monument.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fotothek df ps 0004451 Ausstellungen ^ Ausstellungsgebäude ^ Denkmäler - Denkmal.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fotothek df ps 0004493 Ausstellungen ^ Ausstellungsgebäude ^ Denkmäler - Denkmal.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Sadly but COM:FOP in Russia allows only for non-commercial use. Same matter already discussed in Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Monument to the Conquerors of Space --Justass (talk) 18:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Simonxag (talk) 02:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as already done before, Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Monument to the Conquerors of Space. Deja vu. On a side note, what makes this, shall we say, structure, so favored by deletion folks? On another side note, the Fotothek upload appears to contain thousands of COM:FOP vios for Moscow alone, shouldn't it all be trashed? NVO (talk) 10:51, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, copyvio (no FOP). Kameraad Pjotr 20:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
KUKA images
[edit]File:Industrial robots-transparent.gif ()
File:Factory Automation Robotics Palettizing Bread.jpg ()
File:Automation of foundry with robot.jpg ()
File:Robotics Cutting Bridge Building Parts.jpg ()
File:KUKA robot for flat glas handling.jpg ()
File:KUKA Industrial Robot KR10 SCARA.jpg ()
Images claim to have permission by KUKA. This would need OTRS verification, otherwise they need to go. -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 20:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment: permission from the company KUKA (www.kuka-roboter.de) was sent today to permissions-commons(at)wikimedia.org for all 6 images. 16th Januaray 2010
- Permission received at OTRS:4345244. Stifle (talk) 18:24, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to close as kept, but some license tags do not match the license mentioned in the OTRS message. Could you please fix that, otherwise I will see when I find the time. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 00:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- The OTRS ticket says PD, so necessarily any free license is also correct. Stifle (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- In theory, yes, but we are tagging files with the least restrictive free license. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 18:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- The OTRS ticket says PD, so necessarily any free license is also correct. Stifle (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to close as kept, but some license tags do not match the license mentioned in the OTRS message. Could you please fix that, otherwise I will see when I find the time. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 00:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Kept, changed the licences according to the OTRS-ticket. Kameraad Pjotr 20:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
This image is not one of the set of images covered by the copyright waiver granted in the OTRS tickets mentioned in Template:Swiss Government Portrait. Moreover, a derivative work of this specific image was recently used in a political campaign in Switzerland, and the Federal Chancellery invoked copyright to prohibit this reuse, citing the legal disclaimer of the source website according to which reuse is not allowed without permission. See the report of the en:Neue Zürcher Zeitung at [5]. Accordingly, this is an unfree image and must be deleted. Sandstein (talk) 22:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- This might also apply to other images from Category:Official Swiss-Federal-Council photographs. I've invited the users who wrote the template to comment; they may be better placed to evaluate whether we ever received proper permission for these files. Sandstein (talk) 23:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- How is it different from the unedited version of the same image (File:Bundesrat der Schweiz 2009.jpg)? -- User:Docu at 05:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- The copyright status of the edited image specifically was the subject of media reports (see also the official statement) but I think that there's no difference to the others as regards copyright. That's why I am questionioning the copyright status of all images in Category:Official Swiss-Federal-Council photographs. None of these images have ever been properly released, it seems. They do also not name the photographer. Sandstein (talk) 07:44, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- http://www.parliament.ch seems to say the same. According to a recent check (OTRS Noticeboard) it was ok for the image I had double checked.
- Independently of the copyright status, it might just be a problem of personality rights. Seems a bit silly to request pre-approval for a caricature. -- User:Docu at 08:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- BTW, the one that is being debated is the one without Burkhalter. -- User:Docu at 12:44, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
I am the person who originally requested the permission from the Federal Chancellery and forwarded it to OTRS. My original request was targeted at the portraits of the Federal councillors (such as this one), but I later asked for other pictures of the FC; the person who gave me the authorization used so very general language ("les photos des CF publié par la Confédération doivent être/rester libre, sans "copyright"); however, we never discussed explicitely the yearly picture of the Federal Council; is the authorization good enough for pictures in Category:Official Swiss-Federal-Council photographs ? I am not sure. It is a pity, really — it we had emailed them last week and asked for confirmation, we would doubtless have received it, but there is no chance for this now (which also means that there is no point asking for free content from the Confederation anytime soon...). I am not terribly disturbed by what was was published in the newspaper (which I had noticed as well): neither by the disclaimer on the web site (given that we have actually asked for permission to reuse some pictures), nor by the fact that the Chancellery invoked copyright to forbid a use of this image (which seems like a politicial decision which has little to do with protecting copyright). That the Chancellery would give a blanket permission to reuse the image on one side, and invoke copyright to forbid its use on the other (both in good faith) would not really be a surprise (actually, I could bet that the authorizations we received are stored only on the email system of the person who gave them — if they are stored at all). It may be worth noting that the authorization template has been abused (in good faith) in the past; see here.
The best course of action would probably be to wait until the controversy dies down, and recontact the Chancellery to clarify which pictures are covered or not. In the meantime, I am not really sure what to say about the deletion. Schutz (talk) 21:45, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. It's probably best to postphone this decision until the current press run dies out a bit. Obviously, it's mainly about personality rights and not about the image as such. Although we generally request images to be reusable for any purpose, we wouldn't be able to keep any images (including portraits) depicting people, because they could be used in an abusive context. I do think there would be similar political controversies if one tryied to use an image of Barack Obama for a political campaign against him. --PaterMcFly (talk) 14:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- On a tangential note, while I'm fully aware of the Foundation's core principles, I'm wondering whether this would be one of the situations where the Foundation might want to reconsider rejecting a CC-BY-ND license by default: photographic works of living people that could be reused to illustrate article content but not modified in a way that sparked the above controversy in the first place. Just my 2 cents of course. MLauba (talk) 12:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yea, I agree. Just thought about something like this myself. It didn't even need to be "ND", "ND-altered" (only unaltered reproductions allowed) would even suffice. I think the number of pictures that really are used for profit use from commons is comparably small and it needs adequate review by anyone actually wanting to do this in any case, so that an extra indication that one should not use the picture in a out-of-context manner would not make commons less usable. --PaterMcFly (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Official pictures are nice to have, but they tend to look all the same and can be found every else too. At least for contemporary politicians, we should be able to find other pictures. BTW here are some official ones that are a bit different. -- User:Docu at 06:32, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I disagree here. If you take a look at de:Bundesratsfoto, you see that these official pictures are somewhat changing over time. And there's a difference between an "official photo of a government" and photos during an "official visit" or an "official task". --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
I cross-referenced the discussion on File:Bundesrat der Schweiz 2010.jpg. -- User:Docu at 11:29, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Can this be finally closed? It makes zero sense to put this image up for deletion, there is even an OTRS permission given to us and the Neue Zürcher Zeitung explanation does not stand.--Avala (talk) 16:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Kept, OTRS-permission. Kameraad Pjotr 18:34, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
