Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2009/09/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
This is modern art and US FOP does not allow it on Commons...only buildings and landscapes and people. If the art work was installed before 1978, it would be OK too under US COM:FOP but this is clearly new art after 1978. Leoboudv (talk) 01:09, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete And the artist, Leonardo Nierman, is still very much alive. --Simonxag (talk) 21:53, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Rocket000 (talk) 23:39, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Taken from the file given as the source. While this is hosted on a US government website, not all images from this website are public domain — see here for details. Image was taken by a private person who helped put together the source document, not by a US government employee, it's obviously not PD-old, and there's no evidence that it is released under a free license, so copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 01:15, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete What Nyttend is referring to is this, the copyright notice for the source website. The National Park Service allows separate people to submit a photograph of a property in their application; these images do not fall under the blanket public domain license listed for the website because the copyright is owned by the individual. This image appears to be taken by a separate photographer, so the "public domain" license claimed on this image is doubtful. Royalbroil 12:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The corresponding NRHP text document was prepared in 1978 by three authors, of the Louisville Historic Landmarks Commission. The photo from 1978, which accompanied the NRHP application, was probably taken by one of them. Photo copyright is most likely owned by photographer or by Louisville Historic Landmarks Commission, and is not public domain. Doncram (talk) 03:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Taken from the file given as the source. While this is hosted on a US government website, not all images from this website are public domain — see here for details. Image was taken by a private person who helped put together the source document, not by a US government employee, it's obviously not PD-old, and there's no evidence that it is released under a free license, so copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 01:15, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete What Nyttend is referring to is this, the copyright notice for the source website. The National Park Service allows separate people to submit a photograph of a property in their application; these images do not fall under the blanket public domain license listed for the website because the copyright is owned by the individual. This image appears to be taken by a separate photographer, so the "public domain" license claimed on this image is doubtful. Royalbroil 12:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The source document for the photo identifies the photo credit for John Cullinane. It is most likely he was either a contract photographer or an employee of "Preservation Alliance, 712 W. Main Street, Louisville, Kentucky", which is stated to hold the negative. There is no suggestion or likelihood he is a federal employee. Doncram (talk) 04:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:48, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Taken from the file given as the source. While this is hosted on a US government website, not all images from this website are public domain — see here for details. Image was taken by a private person who helped put together the source document, not by a US government employee, it's obviously not PD-old, and there's no evidence that it is released under a free license, so copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 01:16, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete What Nyttend is referring to is this, the copyright notice for the source website. The National Park Service allows separate people to submit a photograph of a property in their application; these images do not fall under the blanket public domain license listed for the website because the copyright is owned by the individual. This image appears to be taken by a separate photographer, so the "public domain" license claimed on this image is doubtful. Royalbroil 12:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:47, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
How can Codas be the copyright holder of this 1942 image? No clear source is indicated. Leoboudv (talk) 01:29, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete We use the rule of 70 years after the creator's death for Italy. --Simonxag (talk) 21:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Obviously not GFDL/CC-BY-SA and there's no reason why it would be PD. Rocket000 (talk) 23:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
No permission and Outside of project scope. ■ MMXXtalk 04:00, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly some sort of copyvio of an advert. The image still has its watermark. Inductiveload (talk) 04:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:42, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- The nominating user was asked not to make any more nominations and has been blocked (again). See Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece. -- ArielGlenn (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:43, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- The nominating user was asked not to make any more nominations and has been blocked (again). See Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece. -- ArielGlenn (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- The nominating user was asked not to make any more nominations and has been blocked (again). See Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece. -- ArielGlenn (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- The nominating user was asked not to make any more nominations and has been blocked (again). See Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece. -- ArielGlenn (talk) 14:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- The nominating user was asked not to make any more nominations and has been blocked (again). See Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece. -- ArielGlenn (talk) 14:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:49, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- The nominating user was asked not to make any more nominations and has been blocked (again). See Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece. -- ArielGlenn (talk) 14:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Photo of a statue copyrighted by sculptor George Xenoulis. No FOP in Greece. Geraki TLG 14:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:16, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:49, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- The nominating user was asked not to make any more nominations and has been blocked (again). See Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece. -- ArielGlenn (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
redundent --User:Winius
- Redundant to what? Usually, we allow more than one image of the same thing, as long as they are not identical. - Jmabel ! talk 17:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Keep Not a duplicate, and has some value. 86.128.234.54 03:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)- Keep - Not sure what this is redundant to, and it is being used on the English Wikipedia. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
This is a copyrighted image owned by the band used to promote them. I've seen it on official sites, so I know this shouldn't be here, and it doesn't need to be here as there are enough free images. --User:FotoPhest
- Delete 15 results on TinEye, uploaded here a week ago. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Nilfanion (talk) 10:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- The nominating user was asked not to make any more nominations and has been blocked (again). See Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece. -- ArielGlenn (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- The nominating user was asked not to make any more nominations and has been blocked (again). See Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece. -- ArielGlenn (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:54, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- The nominating user was asked not to make any more nominations and has been blocked (again). See Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece. -- ArielGlenn (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Quite frankly, this user ought to be permanently banned. His contribution here, if it can be called that, is entirely negative. His behaviour also comes very close to trolling. Constantine ✍ 18:15, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. No real reason for deletion, user blocked. Yann (talk) 12:05, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Previous discussion was closed solely because nominator was blocked, but this is a legit nomination. The text is long enough to be copyrightable, the text was written after 1997 (note it says "The statue was erected here in 1997 [...]"), and there is no FOP in Greece. Dcoetzee (talk) 01:41, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - As per this Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece --...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 11:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:57, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. No real reason for deletion, user blocked. Yann (talk) 12:04, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:58, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- I don't agree. See comments on userpage of Iconoclast about similar requests and who has been blocked for vandalism. Wouter (talk) 10:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Pending research outcome ShakataGaNai ^_^ 16:28, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete This is a 1990 sculpture in Greece, where there is no Freedom of Panorama for works of art displayed in public. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- What about all the other images in Category:Monument of the hand? Wouter (talk) 08:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Those depicting the sculpture shot from different angles have to be deleted as well for the same reason (not the images of the memorial plaques that are plain text, not a copyrighted work of art). ̴̴ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 01:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:FOP Greece. Artwork is by Antonia Papatzanaki, born in 1960 and still alive. The file can be restored 70 years pma of the artist. --Rosenzweig τ 09:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- I don't agree. See comments on userpage of Iconoclast about similar requests and who has been blocked for vandalism. Wouter (talk) 10:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. No real reason for deletion, user blocked. Yann (talk) 12:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- I don't agree. See comments on userpage of Iconoclast about similar requests and who has been blocked for vandalism. Wouter (talk) 10:42, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. No real reason for deletion, user blocked. Yann (talk) 12:02, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Es un archivo de publicidad de la empresa
- Translation: Is an entreprise advertising file.
- This deletion request was a member of Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing subpage. The original nominator of this file was Undeath (talk · contribs); see diff — df| 11:26, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - copyvio, out of scope. — df| 11:29, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:37, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
It not used anymore, and have been not used anywhere, so it's safe to delete.
- This deletion request was a member of Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing subpage. The original nominator of this file was Ivan Akira (talk · contribs); see diff — df| 11:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- And please always notify the uploader when nominating for deletion. Inductiveload (talk) 03:40, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Hi there, sorry Inductiveload, I made you in the trouble to managing my file deletion process. First, I'm as the author who request the deletion of that image. Why? The major reason is I need to rename (which means move) that image from name File:WikipediaOfflineIcon32.gif to File:WikipediaIcon32px.gif. So basically, there are image duplication. File:WikipediaOfflineIcon32.gif is not needed because both of them are identically same. I'm happy with your enthusiasms to prevent myself from deleting my own file, but no need to worry, I'm want to delete it because I want to rename the image to the new name, so nothing is lost. Cheers! Ivan Akira (talk) 10:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete OK, sure thing. I'm sorry I didn't notice you were the nominator and uploader! My bad. Sorry to interfere! Inductiveload (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment It's fine Inductiveload... Ivan Akira (talk) 13:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Rocket000 (talk) 23:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
nothing
- This deletion request was a member of Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing subpage. The original nominator of this file was Ron whisky (talk · contribs); see diff — df| 11:42, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete No source, no license, no nothing. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:45, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- (ec) Delete - per Pieter Kuiper. No source/license/permission since a long time. — df| 11:55, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Kwj2772 (msg) 13:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Logo Zirland (talk) 09:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Did you understand what the stands in {{PD-textlogo}}? Chaddy (talk) 19:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Unused anywhere and only for promotional purposes. Out of scope. Wknight94 talk 11:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Licensing seems okay and may have some long-term use. Within the scope as does have some potential educational use even if it is not being used like many free company logos. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:40, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Not used on any Wikipedia McNeight (talk) 23:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Not being used on any Wikipedia is not a reason to delete, and the author released it under free licences. Inductiveload (talk) 03:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. We require that a release be sent to OTRS for book covers or other publicly released material. –Tryphon☂ 11:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
better quality images exist at Image:Neohelix albolabris shell.jpg and Image:Neohelix albolabris shell 2.jpg --Snek01 (talk) 22:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason to delete. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- If you still think so, then read the message below. --Snek01 (talk) 21:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Different images, it may be helpful to have an image of the shells together as well as separate. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- This image is worse in quality although it is from from the same source. It will NEVER be used until somebody will upload it in better quality. I know it, because I upload images only like this and I have uploaded this one also and those ones also. Keep it FOREVER if you love it so much, but there is no need to keep everything. Additionally such images can be easily placed above or next to itself. It is useful to delete it, so nobody will use accidentally use this image of such horrible quality. This is not propose to delete, this is normal demand to delete it for practical purposes. There are few tens possibilities how to manage two or three objects. I usually upload only one file and I accidentaly uploaded two. If you want to keep things that somebody uploaded accidentaly, then keep everything. Then a user will need to became a detective to decide which is the best image for his puproposes, because there will be MANY similar images. --Snek01 (talk) 21:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- The quality does not seem that bad to me, it is certainly good enough to be usable. Yes things can be deleted if they are uploaded accidentally and are not useful, such as images identical to another image, but this is not the case here. I don't see any practical reason why it needs to be deleted, it is within scope and no recognisable copyright issues. I would be more sympathetic towards uploader requested deletion if it was the uploaders work, but that is not the case here, it is public domain material from a book. This is deletion request like any other, and my keep vote stands. Camaron · Christopher · talk 11:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- This image is worse in quality although it is from from the same source. It will NEVER be used until somebody will upload it in better quality. I know it, because I upload images only like this and I have uploaded this one also and those ones also. Keep it FOREVER if you love it so much, but there is no need to keep everything. Additionally such images can be easily placed above or next to itself. It is useful to delete it, so nobody will use accidentally use this image of such horrible quality. This is not propose to delete, this is normal demand to delete it for practical purposes. There are few tens possibilities how to manage two or three objects. I usually upload only one file and I accidentaly uploaded two. If you want to keep things that somebody uploaded accidentaly, then keep everything. Then a user will need to became a detective to decide which is the best image for his puproposes, because there will be MANY similar images. --Snek01 (talk) 21:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Simple explanation for simple users: accidentally uploaded image with low resolution. --Snek01 (talk) 21:13, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Not a duplicate, no compelling reason to delete it (no strong support for deletion either). –Tryphon☂ 14:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorma for sculptures in Norway Rettetast (talk) 12:34, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Surely there should be exceptions for places like Vigelands Parken, as it is considered a national treasure. --Dearsina (talk) 08:55, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe. It is possible that the copyrightholder allows commercial use of images of the statues, but that would require some evidence. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - evidence to the contrary: http://www.vigeland.museum.no/no/informasjon/copyright /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:39, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Per COM:FOP#Norway and COM:L#Norway, public domain 70 years p.m.a., Gustav Vigeland died 1943. A very good detail photo, you may undelete it in 2014. Martin H. (talk) 13:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Restored per UDR - Jcb (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Image is a still from a 1968 film Alex:D (talk) 14:26, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Clear copyvio. Inductiveload (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- You didn't notify the uploader. I will do that now. Inductiveload (talk) 03:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator --Leoboudv (talk) 06:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:19, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Image comes from here: http://www.comedie.ro/actori_cv.php?id=20 Alex:D (talk) 14:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete I agree, copyvio. Inductiveload (talk) 03:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. --Dferg (talk) 22:15, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Doubtful that this is Self-created PD --Admrboltz (talk) 15:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- KeepThe user has now changed the source to Syrianhistory.com, which appears to have a Commons-friendly licence. Inductiveload (talk) 03:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Doubtful that is is self made, has a watermark from [1] but it appears to be a deadlink. Admrboltz (talk) 15:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Watermark indicates copyright and the professionalism of the image makes it seem unlikely that it is user created. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Not deleted - still there. This, that and the other (talk) 10:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Pruneautalk 12:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Its Terrible --User:Beatlefan97
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:01, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Invalid deletion reason. --Admrboltz (talk) 19:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment What is terrible, the photograph or the Dollar in general? --Specious (talk) 00:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Clear keep. What is the problem with it? - Jmabel ! talk 01:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio as this xenophobic poster has enough "artistical originality" and due to its temporary display is not covered by COM:FOP. In addition, the photo is likely also not free (source website[2] has a copyright note). Though the legal situation is rather clear, I've filed an rfd instead of a speedy to allow community input. Túrelio (talk) 18:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete because its level of originality (graphics) is high enough to be considered a "work". FOP doesn't apply in Germany for non-permanent installations. I would like to see those posters burned in real life as well, but that's a different story. Nillerdk (talk) 20:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. We don't need to talk long here. It's clear. Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
useless content 92.229.211.203 10:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Attack image. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete A classless attack image. Schroeder is no Hitler. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete unless uploader is a notable satirist. --Simonxag (talk) 22:01, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 22:19, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
bad file, useless Frédéric (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed, but why did not you notify the uploader? I will do that now. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Can't see any use within the project scope. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:31, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:50, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
This is an advertising image, including the logo of the company, and as such is probably out of scope and is a copyvio. Inductiveload (talk) 12:19, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Probably copyrighted as it includes a logo, and I can't see any real use within the project scope. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
I uploaded the new, improved version of the diagram File:Książ Castle - Riese.PNG Les7007 (talk) 17:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete That normally isn't a reason to delete, but as you are the uploader, you requested it, the old one is unused, and the quality is better in the new file, it's OK. Inductiveload (talk) 03:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The diagram has low quality and does not reflect the present state of the underground. --Les7007 (talk) 15:23, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Sole contribution by user; insert at lower right makes "own work" unlikely; low quality GIF, unused, not enough description to be likely ever to work out usefully what it is. Jmabel ! talk 17:18, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Unlikely to be of much use, and image quality and insert suggests that it was likely taken from a website. Camaron · Christopher · talk 16:29, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Probable copyvio. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
converted from a speedy by User:Cflm001 for "Low quality version of File:Bandeira do Piauí.svg" (aka duplicate) to rfd by me as flags are slightly different. Image is actually unused. --Túrelio (talk) 13:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Suggest just rename the categories and put your image in the other version section, that's what usually happens with Category:Obsolete flags. --Anime Addict AA (talk) 18:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/Superseded. --Anime Addict AA (talk) 17:12, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept - fonts are different; added NowSVG (non-admin closure). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:49, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
converted from a speedy by User:Cflm001 for "Low quality version of File:Flag of the Mexican Insurgents (naval variant).svg" (aka duplicate) to rfd by me, as images are not 100% identical (colors). Image is actually unused and has artifacts at its left border. --Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Delete Too low quality to be useful. --Leyo 09:37, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Wknight94 talk 21:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Image is a still from a 1975 film Alex:D (talk) 14:26, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Clear copyvio. Inductiveload (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Please notify the uploader when nominating for deletion. I will do it now. Inductiveload (talk) 03:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Shouldn't this be done automatically? --Alex:D (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but it wasn't done over 12 hours after the nomination. I think it is supposed to do it automatically: the wording in the template suggest that it is, but it also says to do it yourself if the relevant things haven't appeared within a few minutes. In the few NfDs I've started, none have automatically left notification on the user's page. Maybe it's broken? Inductiveload (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Shouldn't this be done automatically? --Alex:D (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Please notify the uploader when nominating for deletion. I will do it now. Inductiveload (talk) 03:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, anyone? Copyright infringement? It means big trouble? --Alex:D (talk) 17:22, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 19:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
I doubt that this is a user created image, looks like a professional awards show image. Admrboltz (talk) 16:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 19:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Derivative work. Eusebius (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I cannot read Czech, but these texts are probably not sufficiently original for copyright protection. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- OK. For the record, I have speedied other pictures in the same series, but they showed mainly photographs. --Eusebius (talk) 19:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- There is write something like one political party (orange) is against corruption and the other party (blue) are mafians. I think this one is really photo taken with his cellphone (see EXIF). —Jagro (talk) 20:18, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Authorship of the photograph is not questionned. --Eusebius (talk) 20:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- There is write something like one political party (orange) is against corruption and the other party (blue) are mafians. I think this one is really photo taken with his cellphone (see EXIF). —Jagro (talk) 20:18, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- OK. For the record, I have speedied other pictures in the same series, but they showed mainly photographs. --Eusebius (talk) 19:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Photo of electoral advertisment in the public place. It is somethink like this. —Jagro (talk) 20:18, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- No, I don't think it's comparable, this one can definitely not fall under a FOP exception (only ineligibility + de minimis for the logo). By definition, an electoral advertisement is not permanent, and what's displayed on an advertisement panel is a copy, not the original, for which the rights are not cancelled. --Eusebius (talk) 20:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete I rekon this poster has enough to be copyrightable, there is layout as well as textual content. FOP doesn't apply to temporary adverts (or else any edvert in an FOP-friendly country would be fair game on Commons, and they're not). The logos are not de minimis in my opinion, as they are a major element of the election poster. Inductiveload (talk) 21:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- ¿? Even the graffity is more original than the layout and the logos. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, temporary poster is not FOP. Kameraad Pjotr 19:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Possible copyvio since the image file is identical to the one at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/military-obituaries/army-obituaries/5675345/Major-Jack-Bazzard.html Jll (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted, per nominator. Kameraad Pjotr 19:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Source says Copyright © 1995-2007 Denver Public Library, Colorado Historical Society, and Denver Art Museum Yann (talk) 21:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Denver Public Library's claim is almost certainly copyfraud. Given Beam's death date, probably OK to keep, but there may be other issues of which I'm not aware. - Jmabel ! talk 01:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. The Library should have its legal counsel review 17 U.S.C. § 506(c). —LX (talk, contribs) 11:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept, per LX. Kameraad Pjotr 19:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Images of Arizias
[edit]- File:Dch3.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Dch2.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Dcs1.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sullana edited9.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Chilalo8.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Cem.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Rmpl.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Cpiu.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bujanzarma.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Poecho.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Taxi sulla.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Barrio sur.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Puente del Ferrocarril.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Mercado Central.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:ESC-MAR.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Escudo de bellavista.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bandera de Sullana.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Marcavelica.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Entierro tallan.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Tallanes.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Capullana.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Tallan1.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Concejo Provincial.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Anticity.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sntim.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:MANBRE.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Puentejo.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sullana69.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Antigua.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Chri1.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Iglecia.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Capullana-sullana.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:S-metro.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Area-sullana.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Edificio,sullana.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Sullana.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Escudo de sullana.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
I believe that almost all User:Arizias's images are copyvios because several of them were taken from different websites.
Deleted. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:04, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece 77.49.171.8 19:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. All these nominations by the above IP are simply nonsentical. There is no such thing in Greek legislation. Restriction of the freedom of "panorama"?!--Yannismarou (talk) 15:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: All these mass DR requests by Iconoclast (and his anon IP) appear like a bad faith attempt to delete images while a discussion over them is still taking place. Iconoclast and his IP should be banned for 1 week to stop this disruptive activity as he shows no courtesy or good faith to others. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Iconoclast is not responding to the objection above, he is just stacking another nomination on top of the previous one. This is disruptive behaviour. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece 77.49.119.61 18:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, ineligible (simple shape and short text). –Tryphon☂ 16:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Kept. PER Tryphon. MGA73 (talk) 21:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece Iconoclast (talk) 09:55, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep This is the second nomination; Iconoclast is disruptive; I suggest a block. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:00, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Question of FOP is only relevant if the object is some sort of "work of art". This is only a cross and some lettes. --MGA73 (talk) 11:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Previous closing stands. –Tryphon☂ 11:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Es un archivo de publicidad de la empresa
- This deletion request was a member of Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing subpage. The original nominator of this file was Undeath (talk · contribs); see diff — df| 11:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - copyvio & out of scope. — df| 11:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
user request
- This deletion request was a member of Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing subpage. The original nominator of this file was Amrhingar (talk · contribs); see diff — df| 11:34, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep It is in use at the German Wikipedia. Inductiveload (talk) 03:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 02:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
please delete; not longer in use --Amrhingar correct malformed DR --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Keep used on the German Wikipedia. --Simonxag (talk) 02:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept. --Eusebius (talk) 08:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)