Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/12/31
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
duplicate picture sorry JellyrollsGR82NS (talk) 01:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Please use {{Bad name}} in future. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
I fail to see how photobucket.com (or the person uploading on photobucket) could hold the rights of this magazine cover. Eusebius (talk) 09:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. CLEAR copyvio to me (only OTRS would convince me) Herby talk thyme 09:42, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Web-resolution image, I just don't believe this is really own work. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:13, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Also G. strauchold.jpg
Delete, the original image is used at http://www.wnhip.uni.wroc.pl/?type=wladze and located at http://www.wnhip.uni.wroc.pl/img/koscik.jpg. Until prooved, I believe that the picture is copyrighted. --Joku Janne(Fi) (Wikiwiki) 01:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC)- Delete CV. I also found two others images which are crearly CV pictures (see User talk:Krystian Kuchta). Different sources, all of them internet ones, and in all cases attribution of the copyright ownership to self Masur (talk) 11:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC) ps. 90% of Krystian Kuchta uploaded files are also CV (those with watermarks) or autorship is attribited to self Masur (talk) 11:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violations -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Out of Scope - Commons is not a host for personal imagees - Abigor talk 05:51, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of project scope and poor quality. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Source: "internet" Luctor 07:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, false license & copyright claim. Someone else's work found on internet = not yours to claim license -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Source: "Google.com", no sign of a free license Luctor 08:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio so speedy, thanks Herby talk thyme 11:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Are all this images own work? I am in doubt Abigor talk 22:12, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination abf /talk to me/ 13:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Derivative work of a 2007 painting. Eusebius (talk) 12:51, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it's free. See http://www.acdc.com/history/?v=a&a=all&id=5 Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 16:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Copyrighted album cover → copyvio. --Kam Solusar (talk) 03:26, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Based on the flickr stream, I doubt the Flickr uploader is the original owner of the image. MBisanz talk 23:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete The image would appear to be from here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 08:04, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
The source website does not say anything about any kind of free license that would apply to the promotional video. Eusebius (talk) 09:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Kept. OTRS permission Bapti ✉ 22:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't believe this is own work Abigor talk 22:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete web resoluton + no metadata abf /talk to me/ 13:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with above, does not appear to be self-made. Looks professional, and likely copyrighted. Alex43223 (talk) 00:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete The image came from here http://www.tonybatman.com/2008/12/a-entertainment-wants-you-to-meet-heather-starlet/
Deleted by Joku Janne: Copyright violation: From http://www.tonybatman.com/2008/12/a-entertainment-wants-you-to-meet-heather-starlet/
The file were using {{PD-ineligible}}, but couldn't use this license; {{PD-chem}} can't be used either, this is a 3D molecule. Thus, this image lacks permission. →Diti the penguin — 03:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete This is not a simple molecule geometry, and it could have been created only either by a proprietary software, or by someone who didn't give permission. →Diti the penguin — 16:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 19:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Restored There is no reason for deletion given. Sorry, ABF. This molecule is clearly PD-ineligible. ChristianBier (talk) 10:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I am in doubt of this pdf is free. Abigor talk 05:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete The American Chemical Society wants to get paid for access to its journals. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:13, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete For Pieter Kuiper. Jacopo Werther (talk) 14:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 15:35, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
No source (http://www.bulgarian-mountains.com/bg/Hotels/Stara/GabrovskiBalkan/KomplexPeina ) or author given Gothika (talk) 10:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
and:
- File:The Mulberry house 11.jpg
- File:The Mulberry house 5.jpg
- File:Komplex Peina 19.jpg
- File:Komplex Peina 8.jpg
- File:Komplex Peina 2.jpg
- File:Komplex Peina 16.jpg
- File:Komplex Peina 4.jpg
- File:Komplex Peina 1.jpg
- File:The Mulberry house 2.jpg
- File:The Mulberry house 1.jpg
- File:The Mulberry house 3.jpg
Deleted per discussion. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 16:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
possibly copyvio Gothika (talk) 15:36, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per this and others abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 16:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Appears to be promotional and possible copyvio -mattbuck (Talk) 15:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted {{Cover}} abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 16:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
derivate works Avron (talk) 15:51, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 19:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I fail to see how such apparently self-made artwork is within scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for my english. I don't understand exactly what you mean. I use this picture (own work free of copyright) for example to whish new year to some WPcontributors for whom I have particular sympathy, or for animation of a portal. Is there any interdiction for that ?PRA (talk) 16:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Keep Might be useful to illustrate a typical new year's greeting card. Besides, we've always allowed the upload of files for user pages or other on-Wiki related business (within limits, but this one clearly falls within those). BTW, it's derived from File:Bonne année 2008.jpg or File:Bonne année 2007.jpg. Unfortunately, the French 2009 version is full of compression artefacts... There's also File:Happy New Year 2009.jpg, which doesn't have these artefacts. Maybe you'd like to redo the French 2009 version, PRA? Lupo 10:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
4)-.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
4)-.jpg){kind=link}
4)-.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
4)-.jpg){kind=link}
4)-.jpg){kind=link}
Qithdrawn -mattbuck (Talk) 12:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Professional photo, I cry foul at own work. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 19:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Appears to be a vanity image - uncategorised, uploader's only contribution -mattbuck (Talk) 16:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 19:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
yes 93.148.25.148 16:20, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Kept. Yes is not a delete reason Badseed talk 18:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Looks like this was photographed off a computer screen. Photo may be own work, but the actual picture showing the house probably not. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 19:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Image representing a corporation or organization that may not have been uploaded by the actual copyright holder. May qualify for usage only on the local Wikimedia project. --ESanchez013 (talk) 17:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted {{Logo}} abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 19:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
License is wrong. Like File:Laika went up into space.jpg Avron (talk) 17:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per other deletion abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 19:54, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
bad name Zlatanov (talk) 18:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per COM:DW abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 16:20, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm not the autor of this pictures and I haven't the autorisation for the publication. T.Benoît (talk) 18:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 19:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people, this is a private event with an expectation of privacy by those involved. Model releases are required from both identifiable individuals. howcheng {chat} 20:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. This is a private event and the photo shows an identifiable person in her underwear. Our "permission" comes from the bride's friend, not the bride herself. It's so obviously a violation of our privacy policy that I can't believe it has stayed on Commons so long. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 16:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
I do not really believe, that the logo has been licensed under GNU Free Documentation License. Source web site does not say anything about it's copyright status, and I did not find any information about the copyrights of the logo. --Joku Janne(Fi) (Wikiwiki) 01:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. No evidence of free license. Eusebius (talk) 09:50, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Low quality, looks like someone took a picture of their television, I find it doubtful that the person on Flickr was this close anyway. ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 07:32, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep User's photostream on Flickr also has some sharper pictures, definitely not a tv screen. Besides, perhaps the low quality is due to the fact that he wasn't that close. Luctor 08:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep. It's not an outstanding photo, but I think it's because it was taken with a zoom lens using a middle-of-the road camera, not because it's from a television. Furthermore, we have no other photos of him at this rally. Superm401 - Talk 18:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Kept. Definitely not a TV still, EXIF info looks plausible to me. Eusebius (talk) 09:54, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
I don´t think it's free. Unai Fdz. de Betoño (talk) 08:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyright notice on the official website. Eusebius (talk) 09:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader is Tim Burton and can release the image into the public domian MilborneOne (talk) 13:51, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. No authorization. Eusebius (talk) 09:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Source is given as http://www.ekuriren.se/ but that site explicitly says that contents are protected by copyright. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Eusebius (talk) 10:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Apparent copyviol; false license on Flickr. Flickr user has set of images obviously not the author of tagged with similar bogus creative commons license. --Infrogmation (talk) 04:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Date also falsified on Flickr: subject was dead already in 2007. --Eusebius (talk) 09:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Per Eusebius; suspicious claim of authorship. --Tom (talk - email) 18:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Flickr owner probably copied it from another site. --Korman (talk) 05:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Tom (talk - email) 21:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Regardless of OTRS permission, this image is a derivative work of star wars, and thus is not free. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm handling the OTRS ticket (Ticket:2008123110000431) relating to this, and have requested some clarification on the licensing. Leaving that aside, I don't think that this is sufficiently similar to Star Wars to be considered a derivative work. The only element that's been directly copied is the light saber, and I doubt that is a sufficiently original idea to attract copyright — Nintendo apparently agrees with me based on the use of the Beam Sword in the Super Smash Bros. series. I'll drop back here once I get a reply to the OTRS ticket. Stifle (talk) 09:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- The lightsaber probably wouldn't be a problem. But I don't think we get a permission from Lucasfilm / Hasbro to use images of their Darth Tater toy under a free license. --Kam Solusar (talk) 03:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, that could be quite a problem. In any case, the ticket is now unlikely to get us a usable permission, so delete. Stifle (talk) 21:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- The lightsaber probably wouldn't be a problem. But I don't think we get a permission from Lucasfilm / Hasbro to use images of their Darth Tater toy under a free license. --Kam Solusar (talk) 03:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Per Stifle. Patrícia msg 21:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
no description, looks professional or from some website, so seems doubtful self-made. Drive-by contributor. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:10, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Found it in at least one external site. Patrícia msg 22:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
No le entiendo The bodyguard (talk) 20:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
q borren esta chorrada cuanto antes, por favor --Elgrantarambana (talk) 10:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Deleted. odder 11:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE along with rest of uploaders contributions... Better for flickr perhaps. Megapixie (talk) 06:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 19:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the uploader's sole contribution - it's unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder of this photo. Kelly (talk) 02:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Agree. Delete. Noroton (talk) 04:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like a personal photo, the kind you would find on Flickr, but the manipulation the image suffered makes me doubt this is the uploader's work. Patrícia msg 22:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 08:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm afraid this picture is delictuous in France, where it's been (very probably) made and uploaded. It is a couterfeit of a protected logo, which is against article L335-2 of the Code of Intellectual Property (at least this is how I understand it, I am not a lawyer). Eusebius (talk) 09:36, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I made it to be a free equivalent to the TAG logo, just as Paris logo rer jms.svg is a free equivalent of the RER logo or Db-schild.svg is a free version of the DB logo. ChrisDHDR 10:20, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I understand what you've done. But I'm afraid the TAG logo is a protected dessins et modèles, which would make your SVG illegal in France (even if you might be able to release it under a free license). But I'm unsure about it and I'd like the opinion of a more experienced admin. I will not close this deletion request by myself. --Eusebius (talk) 12:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- dessins et modèles is not copyright. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- From what I understand (again, I'm not a specialist -- french article on the subject), dessins et modèles are (in France and in the pre-2001 status) protected by both the droit d'auteur (which is copyright, I think) and industrial property. Both make counterfeits delictuous in France (again, as far as I understand the problem). And I think that on Commons, an image must be legal both in US and in the source country. These are the reasons of my "doubts" about this picture. --Eusebius (talk) 17:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- dessins et modèles is not copyright. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I understand what you've done. But I'm afraid the TAG logo is a protected dessins et modèles, which would make your SVG illegal in France (even if you might be able to release it under a free license). But I'm unsure about it and I'd like the opinion of a more experienced admin. I will not close this deletion request by myself. --Eusebius (talk) 12:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 08:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Source website bears a copyright mention, {{PD-art}} wouldn't apply. Eusebius (talk) 13:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- The photo might be old enough. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Couldn't find any date. --Eusebius (talk) 17:14, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
This is a picture of a Maldivian National artefact, which is in public display. And also the source website is a government owned site. Additionally a different source can be found. FaranjiPyrard (talk) 23:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- The fact that the artefact was in public display is irrelevant I think, it does not prevent the photographer from gaining rights over his picture (it wouldn't have been the same with a 2D artefact and a colour photograph). As for the government owned site, it is not incompatible with copyright (Malaysian governmental organisations hold copyright over their work). If you knew when it was taken, it could help a lot, because it is likely that the picture is PD-old anyway. --Eusebius (talk) 09:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 09:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
too young for PD-Russia since 01-01-08. Yuli Klever (talk) 20:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 09:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
To young for pd-russia (en:Ilyushin Il-22 was built 1946/47. Yuli Klever (talk) 20:20, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 09:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Too young fpr PD-Russia-2008 (en:Ilyushin Il-40 was build in 1953. Yuli Klever (talk) 20:23, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 09:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
too young for PD-Russia-2008 (de:Mikojan-Gurewitsch I-320 was build in 1949). Yuli Klever (talk) 20:31, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 09:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Author died in 1946. He had to pass away befoore 1942 for PD-Russia-2008 Yuli Klever (talk) 20:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete that's right. Licence tag does not fit --High Contrast (talk) 13:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 09:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Too young for PD-Russia-2008. Author died in 1953. Yuli Klever (talk) 20:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that whoever put the PD-Russia-2008 was not right. PD-Russia is correct. Do we mass delete PD-Russia images? Alex Bakharev (talk) 00:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- delete, Russia changed it's copyright law retroactively 2006/08, PD-Russia is outdated. sугсго 14:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 09:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
too young fpr PD-Russia-2008. Taken in 1945. Yuli Klever (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 08:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
too young for PD-Russia-2008. All en:Riga class frigates were built after 1950. Yuli Klever (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 08:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
the only en:Alexejew_I-212 was built in 1946/47 too young for PD-Russia-PD Yuli Klever (talk) 20:59, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 08:16, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Photo was taken after WW II, too young for PD-russia-2008 Yuli Klever (talk) 21:01, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Sanbec (talk) 08:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The uploader has disputed the speedy delete since he is of the opinion that the logo is not advanced enough to gain copyright, so I'm bringing it up for discussion. --Notwist (talk) 14:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'd say that {{PD-textlogo}} would work for that, but I don't know if it's in scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I think {{PD-textlogo}} applies. About the scope, it's used in a Swedish article, so I'd say it's ok. --Eusebius (talk) 09:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Eusebius, {{PD-textlogo}} should apply. /Frisko (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Too young to be PD in Russia. (Every photo taken after 1943 is protected since 01-01-08. Yuli Klever (talk) 20:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MBisanz talk 03:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Uploads by WarraDuBrasil
[edit]Uploads by WarraDuBrasil (talk · contribs) are suspected copyright violations. This user allready has a lot of deleted contributions, i fear that he still does not understand the very basics of free images. --Martin H. (talk) 04:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- File:Moisés Villarroel.jpg
- File:RodrigoBarra.JPG
- File:FAscensio.jpg
- File:ACalderon.JPG
- File:Jhon Valladares.JPG
- File:Frank Carilao.JPG
- File:Gabriel Bibi Gonzalez.JPG
- File:MauricioViana.JPG
- File:Joel soto2009.jpg
- File:JoelU.jpg
- File:Joel-Soto-05.jpg
- File:Joel ohiggins de rancagua.jpg
- File:Joel en Atlante 2.jpg
- File:Joel Jaguares.jpg
- File:Joel contra boca.jpg
- File:DPizarro.JPG
- File:Bruno Romo2.jpg
- File:Bryan Castillo Training.jpg
- File:Carlos Muñoz Gol.jpg
- File:Ubilla.jpg
- File:Ubilla Seleccion.jpg
- File:Alex Gonzalez.JPG
- File:Bruno Romo.jpg
- File:Fabian Vera Entrenando.jpg
- File:Fabián Vera.JPG
- File:Lopez diez.jpg
- File:Lopez Cuenca.jpg
- File:Varas Premio.jpg
- File:Sergio Salas.JPG
- File:Sebastián Mendez.JPG
- File:AgustinParra.JPG
- File:Perea.JPG
- File:EuMena.JPG
- File:Eric Godoy.JPG
- File:Jose Contreras Cortes.JPG
- File:Piero Garate.JPG
- File:Cristián Alfaro.JPG
- File:David Reyes.JPG
- File:Alex Varas.jpg
- File:PabloDarioLopez.JPG
- File:Joel Soto.JPG
Deleted per nomination. Next time I suppose to block the uploader. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 15:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Family Guy screen derivatives
[edit]File:Family Guy Live (2).jpg ()
File:Family Guy Live (3).jpg ()
File:Sethmilaalex.jpg ()
File:Familyguy2.jpg ()
Those were taken on a live performance of Family Guy. The main subject of all the images are the big screens showing copyrighted images. As cropping these screens leaves basically nothing behind, I recommend deletion of the images. -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
Deleted per COM:DW & nomination abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 16:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Family Guy character derivatives
[edit]File:Brian Griffin mascot by Gage Skidmore.jpg ()
File:Stewie Griffin mascot by Gage Skidmore.jpg ()
File:Stewie model at Comic Con 2007.jpg ()
File:Stewie drinks.jpg ()
Derivative works of copyrighted Family Guy characters. -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 16:18, 6 January 2009 (UTC)