Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/08/24
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
speedydelete out of project scope uploaded by a vandal Paloma Walker (talk) 00:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Mike.lifeguard: : Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Suspected copyvio, same image from [1], which with a date of 2002, predates the Commons upload by four years. The Commons image may indeed be the original version which has since been added to the other website, however the red border is consistent with the content from that website and not consistent with the other images of this uploader. The owner of the website and the uploader may be the same person or has given permission for the use of the picture, but this has not been made explicit in the description.--KTo288 (talk) 01:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete Copyvio. -Nard the Bard 05:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. as Copyvio Mardetanha talk 06:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Broken svg, does not thumbnail correctly, and combines incompatible FAL, GFDL, and CC licenses. -Nard the Bard 03:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by ChristianBier: Corrupt or empty image
useless, out of scope 85.179.160.135 07:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Useless imageMardetanha talk 10:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
useless, out of scope 85.179.160.135 07:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted.Useless image Mardetanha talk 10:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Not within project scope, as no use within Wikimedia projects. --Superm401 - Talk 07:59, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- I speedy-deleted it as being an attack image, as of uploaders own words "Karl Rove-Agent of Satan". --Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted.by Túrelio Mardetanha talk 10:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Duplicate image, forgot to put good file name on it, duplicate already uploaded as Image:Qualicum_seashore2.jpg KenWalker (talk) 02:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 11:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted poster. -Nard the Bard 03:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Please delete--Motopark (talk) 05:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 11:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
We already have enough pictures of the unfree Wikipedia logo...no need to host this one just to be used on a en.wiki userpage. -Nard the Bard 04:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete replaced on the en.userpage w:en:User:SamB135, the uploader probably just didn't know where the original file is stored (and that the logo is copyrighted) --Martin H. (talk) 14:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 19:12, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted photos and a book. -Nard the Bard 04:39, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 11:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
I can't establish the author's identity or age beyond doubt. The license, therefore, is not valid. My mistake. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Kept. pre 1923 from USA. Yann (talk) 19:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Unused personal photo out of project scope -Nard the Bard 05:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
this is funny and childlike photo but is it really valid reason for deletion that it is not used right now? I just ask because I have resently tried to draw attention to the huge volume of sex service advertisment on the Commons where most photos only are used in categories such as "porn actresses". I do find this photo much more harmless and probably will not create lot of noice. --Salvör Gissurardóttir (talk) 06:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 11:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Unused personal photo out of project scope. -Nard the Bard 05:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 11:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Unused personal photo out of project scope. -Nard the Bard 05:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 11:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
file exists already under the correct name Escherichia coli flagella TEM.png --Brudersohn (talk) 08:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. per user request Yann (talk) 11:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This is clearly a screenshot of a video which is copyright of the artist/label. Metros (talk) 12:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 15:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This photo is copyright of People since it is their photo shoot and is not the work of the uploader. Metros (talk) 12:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
disney logo in the picture --Motopark (talk) 12:40, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Copyvio; screenshot of video Metros (talk) 12:59, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
A likely copyright violation based on this user's other uploads Metros (talk) 13:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Uploader tagged it as "PD-self" but looks very much like a movie screenshot, and the provided source is an unofficial fansite, very doubthfull that this is public domain --Sherool (talk) 14:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 15:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
probable copyright violation Yann (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Citation : probable copyright violation (sorry if it is not here i can give my voice)
- ==> There is no copyright violation, I'm the author of the picture. I choose "upload my own work" or something like that, so why do you think there is a copyright violation.
- Besides, I'm quite surprise, on which points are you assiming that there is a copyright violation ?
- and more important : Image:Ruud-jolie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not.
- ==> How can the community say if it is OR NOT a violation of copyright ? To my mind, only the author of the photography can say that, and that's me. So, I still don't understand.
- I just replaced the picture by a bigger one (trying to prove I own the high resolution one)
Kept Yann (talk) 18:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
New version here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Scharlach1.jpg Old resolution was so high the fingerprints could be read. Joscha Feth (talk) 17:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Kept. higher resolution kept Mardetanha talk 18:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Per 2, this was scanned from a magazine. The only "self" involved here is that he ran the scanner all by himself. --Kww (talk) 00:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Yann (talk) 10:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Frankly insane redirect: Why on earth would anyone type {{Loc}} and mean {{Speedydelete}}? Particularly given the Library of Congress templates {{LOC-image}} and so on. Such counter-intuitive redirects could well lead to situations where someone trying to provide a link to the Library of Congress would accidentally have all their work deleted. --Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. per Adam Cuerden. Yann (talk) 10:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Same photo as Josef Tal-1.JPG in page איתן טל (talk) 20:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Martin H. (talk) 12:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
copyright --24 August 2008 User:Matu08 Request fixed by -- Deadstar (msg) 15:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Nominator is uploader, and had tried to delete it before. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:03, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Uploader says it's a copyvio. They should know. --Simonxag (talk) 00:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
copyrighted statue? no FOP in US? The Government can infringe copyright too you know... ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like a Delete to me. Stifle (talk) 13:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted clear case of derivative work of protected 3D art. --Durin (talk) 17:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Durin: Derivative work: Derivative work of 3D art; protected in the U.S.
probable copyright violation as well as other images uploaded by this user: Image:PekkaKortteinen.jpg, Image:Aho vs. Ruuska.jpg, Image:Kempeleen-Lentopallo.jpg, Image:Daniel-Koncali.jpg, Image:Kunnari-Heikkinen.jpg. Yann (talk) 11:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- Although presented as "own work", looks very alike the Paris 2012 logo which is copyrighted --Tieum p (talk) 20:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Et alors je ne vois pas où est le problème! L'image n'a rien à voir avec la précédente! --Adam8 (talk) 11:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- I am not a law expert so I am not 100% sure this would be a problem. I just did this deletion request so that more knowledgeable people can advice and make a decision. The previpous work Paris 2012 is copyrighted and your work is very close (you changed 12 to 20). I wanted to be sure the Wikimedia Foundation does not run into problems because of this.
- Et alors je ne vois pas où est le problème! L'image n'a rien à voir avec la précédente! --Adam8 (talk) 11:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. This is a derivative work of another copyrighted work. Creating those is not allowed without permission from the original copyright holder. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 19:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
horrible quality, there are plenty better ones here on this topic Avron (talk) 17:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Kept. Yes, but it is in use. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Photography of university graduates, out of scope because commons is not a Private image collection. Martin H. (talk) 00:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Comment I think this image could be used for showing university dress, but it needs to be renamed. Copyright status needs to be verified too. Yann (talk) 10:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:13, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Image of an award which is not in the public domain Kylu (talk) 03:42, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- For what its worth, the award is meant to be a reproduction of the Nike of Samothrace. However, you can see it's not a precise copy, so creative choices probably went into its making. (On the other hand, if the image is kept, would somebody at the Foundation or wherever this one is kept please take a better photo than this cheesy one in a shipping crate.) --dave pape (talk) 20:42, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- More info: http://www.aec.at/en/prix/ ... I can't find anything on the site stating that the award is copyright-free or public domain. The only rights information I can find at all, in fact, is the copyright notice on the bottom of the page (which is imo irrelevant to the picture). I'd rather Commons erred on the safe side, personally. Kylu (talk) 08:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Nica-2.jpg. /Lokal_Profil 19:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
image of a three dimensional award that is not released to PD or a free license MBisanz talk 03:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
three dimensional artwork not licensed under a free license MBisanz talk 03:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
this image exists in 4 places ~ JohnnyMrNinja 04:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Where? --rimshottalk 17:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
"collection personnelle" is ever so slightly different from "own work" - I suspect a copyvio... Megapixie (talk) 11:13, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- The rest of the users work is a mix of cameras. There might be a reasonable explaination... but all the same:
- Image:Legionnaire 2REI.jpg.JPG - Nikon point and shoot dated sept 2007.
- Image:Attaque lance mousse.jpg - Canon 350d DSLR - dated feb 2007
- Image:Soldat français au CENZUB 3.jpg - Canon 10d old school DSLR - dated feb 2007
- Image:Minimi FAMAS 2REI.jpg.JPG - Second kind of Nikon point and shoot dated sept 2007
- Image:Mortier 81 LLR 02.jpg.JPG - Nikon D70 DLSR - dated Dec 2006
- Image:Norvegian Patrol.JPG - Nikon D100 - dated 2005...
- Image:Swedish musicians.jpg - Canon 30D - dated August 2007
- Image:Emperie collection 01.JPG - Canon 20D - dated April 2007
- That's a lot of different cameras over a very short period. Megapixie (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Image:Norvegian Patrol.JPG - Sgt. Andreas Steindl, NATO Headquater Brunssum --Martin H. (talk) 23:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Uncertain authorship (who is Scala source? Not the ulploader, in any case)). Not a bidimensional work. Might be a copyrighted photo. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 12:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
probable copyright violation Yann (talk) 16:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Deleteprolly yes --Mardetanha talk 18:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
unknown source, permission questionable Avron (talk) 18:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
probable copyright violation Yann (talk) 19:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
probable copyright violation Yann (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
unknown source & licence (there are better photos of real locomotives of this type) Pibwl (talk) 21:21, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Page contains a clear typo and is superseded by Image:Zhuyinsample2.png and Image:Zhuyinbaike.svg. --Voidvector (talk) 22:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. No objections, and not in use. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
very poor and unknown source (there are other photos of Warszawa) Pibwl (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. No source MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:30, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
no source so permission questionable Avron (talk) 18:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Avron! die Herkunft des Bildes ist privat. --Gruß Tom (talk) 19:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No source MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
source website clearly doesn't own this image and i don't think it pretended to release it as PD anyways 76.175.162.28 17:51, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep - Although Aziz Jorat of http://www.ariaye.com/index.html is claiming rights, I think it qualifies under {{PD-Afghan}}.--Executioner (talk) 02:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Image is labelled as PD b/c it comes from the Senator's website, but the caption on ENWP says (and the background of the image implies) that he's on Meet the Press. The strange coloration and absence of metadata supports my suspicion that it is actually a screenshot. Just b/c it's on the website doesn't mean it's a work of the federal government (and therefore in the public domain). In this case, it looks like it's from the news show rather than government, and they would then own the copyright. Chaser (talk) 19:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Has anyone tried emailing them to ask where it comes from and what its copyright status is? I would suggest doing that rather than just guessing. It does not at all look like a TV screenshot and I have a hard time imagining Biden's staff distributing a screenshot in their press kit. ([2] is the full page where the image resides.) It may be, though, a photo taken by an MSNBC employee as opposed by someone on Biden's staff and they could be simply using it with permission as opposed to the authors of it. --UserB (talk) 19:40, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, I gave up with the dead link, but I was clearly too lazy. I've contacted Biden's office for clarification. If I get a positive email response, I'll file it as OTRS permission.--Chaser (talk) 02:08, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- I just sent them another email. We'll see.--Chaser (talk) 07:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, I gave up with the dead link, but I was clearly too lazy. I've contacted Biden's office for clarification. If I get a positive email response, I'll file it as OTRS permission.--Chaser (talk) 02:08, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- As the permission was not provided since November: deleted. --Slomox (talk) 15:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
False information. After I reviewed its original source, I found the cyclone inside the pic should be Hurricane Bonnie. It was possibly caused by server error at time of upload. --Wrightbus (talk) 17:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I'd also like to add Image:Fake Mediterranean hurricane 1992.JPG, Image:1995 Possible Meditteranean Sea Hurricane.jpg, and Image:1995 Possible Mediterranean Sea Hurricane.JPG. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Question Do any of the sections of User:Hurricanehink/Mediterranean tropical cyclone have material that meets WP's sourcing rules (as in a pro-met called that a possible tropical system); if so which are they. If none, perhaps add all the images from your user page? As things stand Keep Image:1995 Possible Meditteranean Sea Hurricane.jpg as fr.wiki uses it, Delete the others. I'd suggest replacing the fr image with a similar one from Mediterranean tropical cyclone.--Nilfanion (talk) 20:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep 1995 January one, the 1983 one, and the October '96 one, since those are used in the en.wp article on Mediterranean tropical cyclone. Delete Image:1995 Possible Meditteranean Sea Hurricane.jpg, Image:1992 Possible Spain Hurricane.JPG, Image:1995 Possible Mediterranean Sea Hurricane.JPG, and Image:Fake Mediterranean hurricane 1992.JPG. Hurricanehink (talk) 00:36, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. Maxim(talk) 17:44, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
