Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2008/07/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
The image comes from the site listed, wich does not have a free licence for their images. The uploader claims to have the owner's consent, but there is no proof of it. Unless the mentioned mail is attached, this image should be deleted Thialfi (talk) 00:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Kept. If they claim to have permission, we'll give an {{Npd}} instead. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:27, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Unnecessary image. Replaced for Bandera de Algarinejo.png --rootology (T) 00:24, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Kept. It is basically the same thing, just one has an outline. Plus SVG > PNG. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Unnecessary image. Replaced for Bandera de Arenas del Rey - Granada.png --rootology (T) 00:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Kept. This is a new one on me. PNG superseding SVG? Anyways, different image, plus SVG's can easily be fixed. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:20, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Was incomplete deletion request with no reason given. Doesn't seem to a useful image in any event. Unused. --rootology (T) 00:28, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Image too awesome to keep. It is PD 5 times over. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
wrong name (castello) --rootology (T) 00:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Author Requested ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Author wants to delete it. --rootology (T) 00:30, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Second time from this user... ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Derivative work. -Nard 03:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Unnecessary image. Replaced for Escudo de Salobreña - Granada.png --rootology (T) 00:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Kept. Different image, different user. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
"I withdraw the copyrights" was original uploader's reason, on an incomplete deletion. The subject as seen at http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juliusz_Roger?uselang=en died in 1865 in Poland--this is clearly PD for Poland, isn't it? Putting it here for review. --rootology (T) 00:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Kept. You can't "withdraw" PD-Old. Unless the image is suddenly not Old any more. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Watermarked throughout. Appears to basically be advertising with all the watermarks - questionable scope ? Megapixie (talk) 00:51, 20 July 2008 (UTC) See also
- Image:Pure graphite packing for pumps,pump packing.jpg
- Image:Aramid and ptfe blended packing .jpg
- Image:Injectable packing and sealing gun for pumps.jpg
- Image:High pressure carbon fiber braided packing .jpg
- Image:Metal Graphite Spiral Wound Gasket.jpg
Megapixie (talk) 00:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Delete. With all that watermarking, I can't see these ever being of any use. And beyond that, yeah, advertising. rootology (T) 00:54, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. All images deleted as advertising, and one indef block. Have I mentioned I really don't like advertising only users? ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:30, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Bad license, no good source, likely copyrighted. Kelly (talk) 00:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete rootology (T) 01:06, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. "© 2008 VVD" ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:09, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Ansiklopedik değil. --rootology (T) 01:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Source was not image & source website was copyright. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:08, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Was an incomplete request that said: "This picture does NOT belong to rthe BBC and they had no right to put it in the public domain." Not saying delete based on that, but based on the fact we don't know who took this. --rootology (T) 01:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. It was obviously taken from somewhere. Even if it was the BBC - I doubt they released it under GFDL. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Stamps of Czechoslovakia are copyrighted for 70 years after authors death. Copyright status of stamps of Israel is unknown. --rootology (T) 01:06, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Orphaned, replaced by Image:Use_slide_rule_multi.jpg --rootology (T) 01:08, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Author requested ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
The image depicts an incorrect chemical structure and has resided in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams for more than a month without objection. Edgar181 (talk) 01:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:32, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
The image depicts an incorrect chemical structure and has resided in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams for more than a month without objection. Edgar181 (talk) 01:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:32, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
!GFDL http://www.imdb.com/media/rm303534336/nm1724255 Megapixie (talk) 01:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Hot copyvio. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
derivative of copyrighted work(s) Rat at WikiFur (talk) 02:59, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 03:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -65.96.157.181 04:27, 20 July 2008 (UTC) Copyright violation - The file have photos from other persons and doesn't respect the licence of the photographs. The photos in case are originally available at http://www.flickr.com/photos/bkm_br/2101936576/ and http://www.flickr.com/photos/bkm_br/115360639/
Keep Those images are available under a {{Cc-by-2.0}} license, which means that as long as the author is attributed (an oversight I've since fixed), this image is not a copyright violation. I don't have time right now, but I'll see if I can't go back later to source and verify the individual images used. --jonny-mt 07:27, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept. Unless some of the images are non cc-by - we're good here. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 07:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Copyrighted toys. FunkMonk (talk) 05:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:59, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Unnecessary image. Replaced for Escudo de Cájar (Granada).png --rootology (T) 06:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Kept. User is uploading their own versions of files, then modifying the description to be "theirs". ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:59, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
At EN.WP this logo is marked as a non-free (fair use) logo. If EN.WP is wrong this file still can be deleted because a a better version is available: Image:Sukhoi logo company.JPG (without the white space below the logo). --85.177.47.153 06:58, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Copyvio either way. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 07:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Fan art of some anime or other. Deriv work. delete. Megapixie (talk) 01:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC) See also rest of the users contributions Megapixie (talk) 01:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. One Piece to be exact. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
this is a popular image on the web. ie. http://desicritics.org/2007/03/19/024126.php -- unlikely uploader is copyright holder Rat at WikiFur (talk) 09:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, yes indeedy. You might want to tag clear-cut cases like this with {{Copyvio}} in future. :) Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 13:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
this is duplicate of Image:Pinella restaurant building.jpg (only difference is title lang) Zache (talk) 16:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Deleted. Exact duplicate, not used anywhere. Samulili (talk) 20:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Putting up for extra eyes--source flickr appears to be all copyvios of Emma Watson, but this one pic at a glance looks like it may be legit. Likely delete, but tossing up for consideration. --rootology (T) 17:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Previously deleted copyright violation, now Flickrwashed through the uploader's own, newly created Flickr account. I can no longer assume good faith, and I've blocked the uploader and added the Flickr account to COM:QFI. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
This page was meant to be in a private wiki, not in the public domain. Also, the creator of the content states "All rights reserved," which does not follow any of the licenses in wikimedia. 76.126.117.138 20:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 20:32, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Out of Commons scope Trixt (talk) 22:08, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. by Thuresson as blatant copyvio.Trixt (talk) 22:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Wrong file selected during upload OFFset32 (talk) 11:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, nominated three minutes after upload. Safe to say this was a mistake. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 22:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster. -- Kam Solusar (talk) 16:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
web resolution. flickr account has definite copyvios, like TV screenshots. Rat at WikiFur (talk) 18:30, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 22:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Copyright violation, low quality scan. [1] ChrisHH (talk) 21:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
![[1]](http://www.interet-general.info/IMG/AugustoPinochet-1-2.jpg){kind=link}
- I added {{Copyvio}} --Wuzur (talk) 21:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, crop of a famous (and non-free) picture. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 22:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Most likely promo photo from web: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio: [2]. Pruneautalk 16:06, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 05:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Unnecessary, unused image of the olympic rings. There are several other images in Category:Olympic rings. -- Kam Solusar (talk) 23:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as duplicate. Many other higher resolution images are available. Pruneautalk 16:03, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 11:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Copyright violation: Photograph created July 15, 1962 -> Picture copyrighted until 2012. Gabbe (talk) 11:07, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - should probably be speedied. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 21:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Note that this image is from manager.co.th. This license can be picture from newspaper and news website if it is on Wikipedia. I advise you upload them individually on each Wikipedia before deleting this on Commons. --125.24.27.247 12:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't believe that Flickr user "Magnafica" is identical with the South african photo artist en:Kendell Geers. Thuresson (talk) 12:53, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2008/07/20#Image:KGbh.jpg ChrisiPK (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 16:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't believe that Flickr user "Magnafica" is identical with the South african photo artist en:Kendell Geers. Thuresson (talk) 12:55, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2008/07/20#Image:KGFFace.jpg ChrisiPK (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted by Nick. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 16:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Music is copyrighted. (Rammstein - Ohne Dich) ChrisiPK (talk) 20:58, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
The image is not potentially usable by any current or future Wikimedia project (class structure is not a suitable wikipedia content, as well as other wikimedia projects). Altt311 (talk) 17:29, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Comment - could you explain a bit please? -mattbuck (Talk) 22:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)- This image shows the class strcture of a secondary school in Hong Kong, which is not a wikipedia content. The numbers are the number of classes the school opens in one year (upper row) and the total number of students in that year (lower row).--Altt311 (talk) 06:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Seems like it just a screen shot of an HTML table - it could be replicated in Wikitables. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 07:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
see also - bakınız Image:Lahmacun being served.JPG --rootology (T) 00:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Running universal replace first. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:24, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- We have a tool for that? rootology (T) 01:33, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed. User:CommonsDelinker. The bot allows admins to add files to be universally replaced across all wiki's (where possible). In addition to its normal job of deleting links. It is being slow today, but once it runs and this image is replaced - I'll delete it. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hint: The image you are goint to delete has a higher resolution (and is therefore better) than the other picture. --Isderion (talk) 02:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted, thanks for the hint, i uploaded the high quality version to the other image because of the better filename. Now: Duplicate to Image:Lahmacun being served.JPG. --Martin H. (talk) 12:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
no evidence it is under stated license Rat at WikiFur (talk) 07:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. No source.Anatoliy (talk) 16:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Was originally tagged as missing source. This poster is probably made during the German occupation of Belgium. Does that fall under {{PD-GermanGov}}? -- Bryan (talk to me) 17:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- No, not every picture the government publishs is a "amtliches Werk". --Isderion (talk) 02:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- No problem, it's history!
Deleted. Void license, no author/date info, source link obsolete Badseed talk 01:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
(and other images from olegvolk.net). Based on uploaders comment appears to require inline attribution - this is stronger than cc-by Megapixie (talk) 01:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep The 640x480 part is fine. But I don't think this person is going to get a link back from usages on Wikipedia. But if they released it under CC-by-something - then I think we are fine. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 01:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Question Where did the cc-by portion come from? Was the the uploaders "interpretation" ?
- That's not clear from the upload. I would guess it was the uploader's interpretation. Megapixie (talk) 02:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Which of course is a problem. We can not simply decide that an image is under a certain license. It is entirely possible that the image is copyright, but we can use it on our website. Which, of course, Commons doesn't accept. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 02:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- And I see no indication of any permissions statement (such as that given in the permission field) on the website. Am I going blind? Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 07:55, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Which of course is a problem. We can not simply decide that an image is under a certain license. It is entirely possible that the image is copyright, but we can use it on our website. Which, of course, Commons doesn't accept. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 02:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- That's not clear from the upload. I would guess it was the uploader's interpretation. Megapixie (talk) 02:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
(Oleg Volk) The phrasing of the permission came from my email response to the request. Please clarify the issue to me. Is the back link not standard for Wikipedia uses? You can respond to photo@olegvolk.net --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.244.252.27 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- If you are the original uploader - could you please forward those emails to COM:OTRS? Otherwise at this point in time we assume there is no permission on any of the images. There is a standard 7 day grace period though. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 19:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. The licence as stated is not acceptable as it prohibits certain derivative works. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
The content of the text in the recording is incorrect. Please see nl:Overleg:Bevolkingsdichtheid#Gesproken tekst (in Dutch). --Jeroenvrp (talk) 13:58, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Why can't you fix it? — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 07:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Because I know that my voice is not 100% suited for these kind of things. So instead of a incorrect recording I prefer no recording. (BTW: Why asking 6 months later?, just trust me and delete it.). Jeroencommons (talk) 18:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Deleted. No objections have been raised. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)