Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/15
October 15
[edit]I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Muzirian (talk) 19:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- You uploaded it in 2022. Why should it be deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- El sonido no es visible, creo. 186.172.12.82 14:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
The thing in the center may make this too complex for pd-textlogo, and it certainly isn't cc-by-sa. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know. It's only a little more complex than these PD Cup Noodles cups. I hope the closing admin has more expertise on Japanese TOO than what's at COM:TOO Japan, because it's really not clear from that where the line is drawn. Is this an "artistic appearance that is worth artistic appreciation" or "composed merely of geometric shapes and texts"? I could go either way on that, but I'm not the one who'd make the decision. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep. According to COM:TOO Japan and the quote highlighted above by Ikan Kekek, this is just text. Some letters may be nested, but it remains only text. Less complex than the Cup Noodles design I think. IronGargoyle (talk)|
No FoP in Uzbekistan. Jamshid Nurkulov (talk) 08:33, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Photography in the Tashkent metro was lifted in 2018, so it shouldn't be a problem. If you're going to say "No Fop," you should provide clear evidence and sources.—-TINKO (talk) 04:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @TINKO see COM:FOP Uzbekistan. It is against the Uzbek copyright law (under Article 28) to photographically reproduce copyrighted works of architecture and monuments for commercial purposes. Quoting the provision: "The reproduction, broadcasting, or communication via cable of works of architecture, photographs, and fine art that are permanently located in a place open to public view shall be allowed without the consent of the author or other rightholder and without payment of remuneration. This rule shall not apply to cases where the image of the work is the main object of such reproduction, broadcasting, or communication via cable, as well as to cases where the image of the work is used for commercial purposes." {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} is a commercial license by itself, so not compatible with this station building. Commercial licensing permission from the station building architect or his heir/s (not the station owner or railway management) is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 14:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Uzbekistan. Jamshid Nurkulov (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Comment. The interior architecture is extremely simple, utilitarian, and a small part of the overarching work (to the point of being de minimis). I am less certain about the de minimis status of the posters inside the building however. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:42, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Official logo claimed as "own work" Arjayay (talk) 10:14, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep but change the licensing status - I think the user was only new when it comes to licensing of free use rationale images. It may still consider changing it to copyright license instead since Solar Entertainment allowed this to be released in public, but not permitting anyone to own it. PandaB31 (talk) 07:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution and no EXIF information, most likely downloaded from Internet. Tim Wu (talk) 10:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Official logotype claimed as "own work" Jamshid Nurkulov (talk) 10:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Logo is nothing but text. Clear example of {{PD-textlogo}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Official logo claimed as "own work". Jamshid Nurkulov (talk) 10:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Official logo claimed as "own work". Jamshid Nurkulov (talk) 10:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Per {{Freepik}} the freepik.com elements here aren't compatible with Commons: their licence says The User may use the content in the Freepik Content provided that [it] is not used or included (in whole or in part) in a database, archive or in any other media/stock product [or does] not use the content in the Freepik Content in printed or electronic items (e.g. t-shirts, cups, postcards, birthday or greeting cards...)
- File:Regnellites nagashimae.png
- File:Wakinosaurus satoi.png
- File:Hokkaidornis abashiriensis.png
- File:Albalophosaurus yamaguchiorum.png
- File:Taikicetus.png
Belbury (talk) 10:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Or esref bitlis kabri.jpg Geraslan06 (talk) 13:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Not sure about the threqshold of originality, the band above seems to be copyrightable CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Probably not, per COM:TOO US, but I'm not sure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems simpler than many of the examples at COM:TOO US. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Too blurred Rathfelder (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mr. Lambkin and friends in court before a Wellcome V0011258.jpg
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 19:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Too blurred Rathfelder (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Too blurred Rathfelder (talk) 15:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mr. Lambkin and friends in court before a Wellcome V0011258.jpg
∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 19:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Not own work 92.243.182.32 17:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- depicted person is w:ru:Долматов, Владимир Иванович, whose fate is unknown after 1919, so that we can conclude that this photo was very likely taken before 1920. I've fixed the date accordingly and changed the author to "unknown". It might qualify for one of the PD-Russia templates or maybe even PD-RussianEmpire. Nakonana (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Not own work 92.243.182.32 17:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Now fixed.
This file was initially tagged by Rose Abrams as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: f1|No indication of licensing at linked source website, while infotable and license states "own work".
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. If the map is from 1899, it should be PD and go by PD-Art. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
COM:Belarus don't trivial logo & COM:FOP Belarus 『Shiro Neko』Обг. 19:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of 4e régiment de Spahis - drapeau.svg, which was uploaded earlier DmitTrix (talk) 19:28, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Closed Limelike Curves (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work
- File:Score winner distribution.jpg
- File:Strategic approval winner distribution.jpg
- File:Primary-runoff election winner distribution.jpg
- File:Hare's method winner distribution.jpg
- File:Black's method winner distribution.jpg
- File:First-preference-plurality winner distribution.jpg
Trade (talk) 23:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- They're my (friend who has given permission's) work. Making these simulations only requires a basic Python script. Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply. Either way, i am unsure if this is within scope of Commons Trade (talk) 00:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Closed Limelike Curves (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal graphics/logos, no educational use, out of scope.
- File:Mech design logo com.svg
- File:SCT Logo 0.png
- File:SCT Logo 5.png
- File:SCT Logo 4.png
- File:SCT Logo 3.png
- File:SCT Logo 2.svg
- File:Social choice and mechanism design.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. These aren't personal logos—they're proposed logos for the sidebar over at Template:Electoral systems, and may still end up being used for a series on social choice theory (SCT) or mechanism design, if we choose to split it off from the one on electoral systems. Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 21:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per your remark. I'm glad you saw this deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:49, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- "Proposed logos for the sidebar". In other words, your personal proposal. There is nothing intrinsically educational here, nor any real prospect of being used. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Are you saying none of these are actually still under consideration for any of the things Closing Limelike Curves stated? Because I don't think we need to rush to hide 7 files if there isn't a really important reason to do so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)