Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
5 October 2024
7 October 2024
Deletion requests on 6 October 2024

October 6

[edit]

File:Erudimus qui custodient terrae fertilitatem.jpg

[edit]

Not valid for Belgian FoP. A parliamentary document cited by the Belgian copyright rules policy page states the legal right "was not intended to apply inside of public museums or other buildings that are not permanently open to the public." The page description implies the location of the work: "Dean's Office of the Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent" (Google Translate-d), which does not appear to pass the public place requirement of the FoP law. The artwork author was Eva Decaluwé . JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


@JWilz12345  Keep I have the following arguments against your nomination:
  1. You are indirectly referring to a document that was attached to a draft version of the Belgium freedom of panorama law, that "public museums or other buildings that are not permanently open to the public" would not a considered to be public place. Are you really sure that the law would not be valid inside public buldings?
  2. The Google translation "Dean's Office" is misleading...
    • The wall painting is not in the private office of the dean but in the public part of the university building
--Geert Van Pamel 16:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Geertivp re: the first question. It depends on the status of school interiors as among the allowed public interiors as based in the spirit of the law. Tom-L mentioned at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/07#Freedom of Panorama in Belgium the so-called Flemish communal laws that seem to include church indoors as public interiors. Plus, two online sources (now archived) – this and this – mention that public interiors that are not permanently open to the public, like museums, are not covered, as the artists who exhibited their works in these indoors do not expect permanent public exhibition of their works.
An important word mentioned in the VPC archive is "openbare plaatsen" – "places where access is not restricted to the private sphere." I don't think most school indoors are part of the "public sphere", though. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @JWilz12345 It is not just "a school", it is a building of the (in origin State-owned) University of Ghent. --Geert Van Pamel 09:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the following argument about the definition "public spaces", that was not restricted by the law:
Quoted from the document, point 2:
"Het toepassingsgebied van de uitzondering is niet beperkt tot openbare plaatsten in open lucht, zodat het ook werken omvat die permanent binnen in openbare gebouwen staan. De memorie van toelichting verduidelijkt dat het moet gaan om plaatsen die ‘permanent bereikbaar’ zijn en niet om ‘openbare musea of het interieur van gebouwen die niet permanent geopend zijn voor het publiek’. Nochtans is deze eis van ‘permanente bereikbaarheid’ – die de toepassing van de uitzondering verengt – niet terug te vinden in de tekst zelf van de uitzondering, zodat hier o.i. geen rekening mee dient te worden gehouden. Een duidelijke wettekst primeert immers boven een afwijkende memorie van toelichting."
Translation:
"The scope of the exception is not limited to public outdoor places, so that it also includes works permanently located inside public buildings. The memorandum of Explanatory Memorandum clarifies that these must be places that are ‘permanently accessible’ and not ‘public museums or the interior of buildings that are not permanently open to the public’. However, this requirement of ‘permanent accessibility’ - which extends the application of the exception - cannot be found in the text itself of the exception, so in my view it should not be taken into account. After all, a clear legal text prevails over an anomalous explanatory memorandum." --Geert Van Pamel 17:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Geertivp we need a text or source that explicitly states publicly-accessible indoors of schools or universities are covered by the Belgian FoP exception. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 22:56, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cork Mayor Mondeo 2006.png

[edit]

Given the other uploads by the user marked as "Own work", it is doubtful that this 2006 picture is own work. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 00:48, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Universal Pictures and Blumhouse presents the premiere of THE BLACK PHONE.jpg

[edit]

Photo credited to photo: Alex J. Berliner/ABImages. The US copyright expired license is patently BS. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yatra-yatri Hindi poem Summary.pdf

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 01:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diagram of a penis.png

[edit]

While human penis anatomy is in scope, I don't see this image is educationally useful, just a derived version of File:Circumcised Male Genitalia.png, and we have better options in the category A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 16:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the nomination and discussion. Thanks. 186.173.162.175 17:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:THEOrussie.jpg

[edit]

likely copyrighted artwork. Translation from French description' Drawing by Jean-Pierre Boudet published in La Nouvelle République des Pyrénées to illustrate Le Voyage en Russie." Ooligan (talk) 04:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see - http://www.nrpyrenees.com/ appears to be "... La Nouvelle République des Pyrénées ..." -- Ooligan (talk) 04:50, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:118524 hermon from ramat tafen PikiWiki Israel.jpg

[edit]

Low quality image, multiple alternatives exist (see category remote views of mount hermon) Poliocretes (talk) 04:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akses Halte Jembatan Merah 2.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Irvan Cahyo N (talk) 05:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AstraZeneca Shoulder Jab 05-02-2021.jpg

[edit]

This image was transferred from flickr without thinking and is causing embarrassment to the subject because he is too easily identifiable, along with his geolocation. The file is not currently in use and several other existing photos on Commons illustrate that topic better. Thank you for kindly considering this request. Gates of Ale (talk) 05:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep file;  Delete old version. I've uploaded a new version of the file without geolocation data. Note that the geolocation is still present on Flickr; you'll need to address that with the user who uploaded it there. Omphalographer (talk) 05:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Omphalographer The person's face is still visible though. I would have cropped it myself to keep the shoulder and arm visible, but not the head or face, but the original uncropped file would remain. Is there any way to crop it in that manner and replace the original file with a cropped version? Thank you for considering it.
Respectfully, I'm still not sure I understand why it's necessary to keep this file when several similar files already exist. Gates of Ale (talk) 15:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just overwrite the file with the cropped version. We can then hide/delete the older ones. Platonides (talk) 22:46, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Platonides Done. It is possible to delete the previous versions? Thank you. Gates of Ale (talk) 02:14, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pulau padar.jpg

[edit]

SCOPE. Private holiday snap. 62.216.206.105 07:16, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elvira Patriz.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope, selfie. For apparent selfpromo. Taichi (talk) 07:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PikiWiki Israel 72439 cultural heritage of israel.jpg

[edit]

picture without any information Pikiwiki - Israel free image collection project (talk) 08:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TimedText:March, "The Stars and Stripes Forever" · Colonel John R. Bourgeois, Director · John Philip Sousa · United States Marine Band.ogg.zh-cn.srt

[edit]

Because I accidentally added too much Brolpgras421 (talk) 08:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Ketut Permata Juliastrid winning Miss Cosmo 2024.jpg

[edit]

source does not indicate a compatible license EdrianJustine (talk) 08:52, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete this file because it is include the Content ID in some parts in that video, so it is not eligible and not marked for CC-BY-3.0 license for that YouTube video.
More info: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2797468 Apipattana (talk) 11:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per Commons:Licensing, not only this video were published on Miss Cosmo's YouTube channel; including on other social media platforms of the organization, all of the photo and video footages from the Miss Cosmo organization; also including the almost of the international, national, and local beauty pageant organizations, were fair use, they're protected by copyright and it is not marked as a free license or a Creative Commons license. Apipattana (talk) 12:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think will should be recommended to  speedy deleting this file now. Apipattana (talk) 11:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This file also per Commons:NETC and WikiProject Beauty Pageants, most of the beauty pageant images uploaded to Wikimedia Commons are not suitable for a fair use protected by copyright or a Creative Commons licenses with NoDerivatives, or NonCommercial, or both. Apipattana (talk) 02:33, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Uploading a captured or saving a video or a picture file with a copyrighted material and then post it on the internet such as YouTube, or Facebook, or Flickr and publish it with giving a free license or a Creative Commons license, this will be considered to be a license laundering, and the file that will be uploaded if detected the aforementioned above will be speedy deleted by the administrator of the Wikimedia Commons. Apipattana (talk) 02:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This file is also against the Commons:YouTube files. Apipattana (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On the Miss Cosmo website, it is stated a copyright notice on the bottom page stated: Copyright © 2024 Uni Media - Unimedia, plus it is neither did published any materials with any free license, which is actually it is a fair use material and it is unacceptable and prohibited on Wikimedia Commons.
Source video: link Apipattana (talk) 06:59, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason Dawans.png

[edit]

Wrong depiction of the coat of arm Ad1194 (talk) 09:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:《 Mary 》.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by The Squirrel Conspiracy as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 09:21, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a random side note: the description says "protestant" Mary, but the coordinates locate the image in or around the Roman-Catholic St. Ignatius Church in Tokyo. How odd. Nakonana (talk) 23:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
取急ぎ、日本語にて、
時折り、プロテスタントの教会に通う、私の見たマリアさま、
さらに、プロテスタントのマリア観と、意味合いも込めつつ、
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/プロテスタントにおけるマリヤ観
説明に、加えました。
イグナチオ教会の、エキュメニカルな朝祷会、よく行きます。
https://www.ignatius.gr.jp/mission2030/ap1/201905_card.html
https://www.ignatius.gr.jp/news/m_events/events_detail.html
初めての方大歓迎。カトリックでない方でもどなたでも安心してご参加ください。お待ちしております。
https://seiichi-miyashita.jimdofree.com/2024/09/28/朝祷会/
備えて、ＡＩにて創作の、とても似た作品、アップしました。
File:Protestant view on Mary.jpg Seiichi Miyashita (talk) 08:20, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is File:《 Mary 》.jpg also AI generated? Nakonana (talk) 09:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
いいえ、違います。実物を、撮りました。
教会内部の写真は、ひかえてくださいね、
作者はわからない、と、伝えられました。
（ご参考）
https://www.instagram.com/p/CpqrOSLySE7/?hl=ja
https://www.instagram.com/p/COoXoePgowY/?hl=ja
https://www.instagram.com/p/CHTxC97Al5y/?hl=ja
https://www.instagram.com/p/CFDjltXJW0o/?hl=ja Seiichi Miyashita (talk) 10:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. By any chance, do you know whether this is a modern sculpture or whether this is a replica of an old sculpture? If I do a Google reverse image search on the image in the first instagram link, I get plenty of search results for replicas of this sculpture in religious supply shops, for example [1][2]. The sculpture is usually referred to as something along the lines of "Our Lady with Children of the World" or "Blessed Mother with Child Jesus and the Children of the World", but I can't find anything on the history of the sculpture. The second of the above links have a copyright statement underneath the image, but I'm not sure whether the statement applies to the sculpture or the photograph of the sculpture. It might be a replica of something ancient, idk, but I feel like it might be a rather modern take on the Virgin of Mercy theme because of its international scope ("children of the world"). Old sculptor's were probably not very concerned about being ethnically inclusive. Nakonana (talk) 15:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The website of the art studio with the potential copyright states that they do make replicas among other things[3]. @Seiichi Miyashita, we will probably need a COM:VRT permission from the Demetz Art Studio to keep this photo on Commons. Nakonana (talk) 15:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
イグナチオ教会も、もう来歴もわからないような、かなり古い、オリジナルの作品と感じます。
作風より、「Demetz Art Studio」の制作にも、見えますね。由緒ある、アトリエのようですし。
たしか、ある旅行サイトに、この作品の写真も、紹介されていて、許可を得たはずと思います。
しばらく、期限を定めず、お待ちいただけるなら、教会とアトリエに、話してゆきたいですね。
教会の、地下のクリプタの入口にて、９〜１６時の間、見れます。日本に寄られたら、どうぞ。
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uhc5swDVd7Q&t=4s Seiichi Miyashita (talk) 16:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skowronek Jerzy.jpg

[edit]

Photography probably from family archive, the uploader is a son of the person on a photo. This is obviously orphaned work and can't be in Wikimedia Commons according to Polish law. Jakub T. Jankiewicz (talk) 09:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sudarshan Chakra Corps.png

[edit]

Old version Adiiitya (talk) 09:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Trishakti Corps India.png

[edit]

Old version Adiiitya (talk) 09:35, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Antonio carlos dos santos araujo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality images without exif data of very generic subjects/nature, out of scope

~TheImaCow (talk) 09:50, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Пам'ятний знак воїнам-землякам, які загинули в роки Другої світової війни, с. Жеребки.jpg

[edit]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1966. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Кулик Петро Іванович. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mahidevran Turbesi2.jpg

[edit]

I claim that, though uploader claims it is "own work", this is a copy of my picture, Shezade Mustafa tomb 5995.jpg, at a smaller size. It is impossible to take a picture that is such an exact match. My picture hs exif info, this one hasn't. Dosseman (talk) 10:05, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку, Озерна.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1968. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:09, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Експозиція музею модерної скульптури Михайла Дзиндри.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1960. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptors. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:16, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Тарасові Григоровичу Шевченку Цебрів.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1993. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Дзиндра Петро Іванович. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Могила Михайла Дзиндри.JPG

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 2006. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Slovolyub (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of modern artworks, no authors' permissions, no FoP in Ukraine.

Quick1984 (talk) 10:26, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WILLFORD LIVE MEDELLIN.jpg

[edit]

low quality, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 10:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate of File:Willford live.jpg GioviPen GP msg 10:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sex Non-Conforming Flag.svg

[edit]

Unused personal design with no evidence of real-world relevance or adoption Dronebogus (talk) 10:37, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my design, and I'm personally not a big fan of it given its coiner excluded intersex people. But I've seen it on multiple LGBT wikis and other flags have followed its pattern, e.g. https://www.tumblr.com/sproutflags/733939885386366976/hormone-non-conforming-hnc
The term is in active use, e.g.: https://web.pdx.edu/~adinno/files/AETC%20SOGI%20Community%20of%20Practice%20DRAFT%20Glossary.pdf https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/bitstreams/4bf6a7e7-66f0-4d25-a5cd-98c942c38946/download https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22sex+non-conforming%22&btnG=
I acknowledge it's not a widely used flag. But I think it still has educational merit for being the most common flag for a term that is actively used. There are some other SNC flags on Tumblr that don't appear to have left the Tumblr bubble (e.g. https://www.tumblr.com/mogai-angels/734376676906106880/part-three-of-my-altersex-flags ). That was my reasoning for uploading it. Intervex (talk) 20:16, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's also used here. Web-julio (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While Commons has a very low bar for inclusion, I still think “used on a Tumblr blog and a wiki” is below even that bar. We aren’t an indiscriminate collection of every free piece of media that exists. Dronebogus (talk) 13:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Пам'ятник Тарасу Шевченку в Демні.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1990. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptors Petro Dzyndra, Stepan Dzyndra and Yaroslav Trotsko . Микола Василечко (talk) 10:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Пам'ятний знак воїнам-землякам, які загинули в роки Другої світової війни, с. Богданівка.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1985. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Ploërdut maison ancienne du Bourg.jpg

[edit]

en tant que propriétaire de cette maison et sans demande de la part de cadou je souhaiterais que ce fichier soit supprimé. 77.204.137.50 11:13, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Homeowners don't have the right to demand the takedown of photos taken from public streets. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wrex Dj.jpg

[edit]

promo press photo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 11:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:سرم مغناطیسی ( انقلابی در عرصه پزشکی).pdf

[edit]

I cant read the Arabic, but I dont think Magnetic serum is a legitimate topic, Rathfelder (talk) 11:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wurktime-dj club.jpg

[edit]

watermarked filtered images, no relevant info or good description, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 11:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yookie.jpg

[edit]

promo press photo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 11:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Fox56 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvio, and author dont state it is AI image, it is really looking like AI image. + even it is AI image, it is not notable, out of scope.

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PXL 20241006 113247476.MP.jpg

[edit]

Wrong title added, reupload with better title Cocoaguy (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cocoaguy Or we can just rename it, what do you want the title to be? AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:19, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Սմբատաբերդ․․.JPG

[edit]

Poor copy of File:Սմբատաբերդ10.JPG Kareyac (talk) 12:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skagegard.jpg

[edit]

Photo of a copyrighted poster Ainali (talk) 12:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I leave this discussion to others. No big thing for me if the photo is deleted. Perjson (talk) 12:48, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Twin paradox

[edit]

Per en:Talk:Twin paradox this is a compelling but factually misleading AI-generated representation of a 1911 thought experiment about an astronaut returning home to find that their twin sibling has aged. By specifically asking the AI to draw a "paradox", it has presumably looked to sci-fi films for inspiration added a dramatic glowing portal and some tendrils of electricity. But the thought experiment is just about an ordinary high-speed rocket flying away from Earth and back again, the two twins would not crackle with blue electricity when they met. Questionable COM:EDUSE for being misleading, and the only current project uses are additions by the uploader.

Belbury (talk) 13:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The files are in use in other wikis, and evidently any "artistic depiction" of a thought experiment will be misleading, as it has never happened. Theklan (talk) 18:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Depictions of described situations can be accurate or inaccurate. If File:Schrodingers cat.svg showed a cat eating a radioactive pellet and glowing with arcs of green electricity, its educational value would be questionable, and perhaps a net negative. Belbury (talk) 08:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File is in use on w:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup/AI images in non-AI contexts as an example of a removed unsuitable image. Dan Leonard (talk) 00:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blacckidd in 2023.jpg

[edit]

out of COM:SCOPE, ordinary person (used nowhere ) Mateus2019 (talk) 13:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduar cuevas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, can be found earlier on web, also per FBMD... or * grabbed from Facebook, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Eduar cuevas (serial copyright violator: file cropper, social media grabber, etc.). Uploaded since 31.01.2013 for Colombian municipalities (and related eswiki entries), Historical photos and official symbols may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status.

Gunnex (talk) 09:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduar cuevas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Highly unlikely to be own works because:

  • User has a long history of copyright violations, see their talk page
  • Almost all images contain Facebook or other social media metadata identifying string in EXIF fields
  • All of low, non-original camera resolution and lacking original camera EXIF
  • Many with lazy, uncaring filenames (including others not in this nomination but uploaded at the same time) indicating the user likely saved them from the internet with little care for their source information
Files

seb26 (talk) 14:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Eduar cuevas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User blocked for copyright violations. Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kolaż Helu 2022.jpg

[edit]

Very low resolution, probably not own work. 92.243.182.32 13:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own work, sorry for the resolution. The work is in no way a copy of another work, and comes 100% from me. 23stycznia2007 (talk) 20:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Axel Olrik

[edit]

Only 1 image Hjart (talk) 13:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peder Winstrup

[edit]

2 images are not quite enough to justify a gallery Hjart (talk) 13:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hugo Egmont Hørring

[edit]

only 1 image Hjart (talk) 13:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thomasine Christine Gyllembourg-Ehrensvärd

[edit]

Only 1 image Hjart (talk) 13:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Kjer Hansen

[edit]

only 1 image Hjart (talk) 13:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olympic Industries Limited building.jpg

[edit]

I don't wanna keep this on my account. আব্দুল্লাহ হিল মাহিন (talk) 14:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Wilhelm Johannsen

[edit]

only 1 image Hjart (talk) 14:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Niels Ebbesen

[edit]

2 images doesn't quite justify a gallery Hjart (talk) 14:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christen Berg

[edit]

only 1 image Hjart (talk) 14:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Søren Larsen

[edit]

only 1 image Hjart (talk) 14:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hajotthu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works.

Yann (talk) 14:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Images focus on the control room, not any specific work. The countless unspecified layout plans on the screens are all very blurry, and the camera views on the screens are PD-automated. COM:DM applies. ~TheImaCow (talk) 15:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PONKUN.JPG

[edit]

picture of a personal character; out of scope Tmv (talk) 14:37, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Saga Masones & Libertadores de Waldo L. Parra recorte.jpg

[edit]

covers of books 87.205.169.187 14:37, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cabbage Patch Kids dolls.jpg

[edit]

Doesn't this fall under COM:TOY regardless of the license the original photographer/source put on it? Ubcule (talk) 15:05, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, probably. I did not know about COM:TOY. Jessamyn - Flickr Foundation (my talk page) 15:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malaysiamerica Flag.png

[edit]

Creative artwork without any encyclopedic value 2A00:6020:B397:E200:99A6:1BC4:73D8:34B3 16:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Base Jump (2924228872).jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Bildersindtoll as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3 not a sufficiently original work, F3 does not apply to FOP issues ~TheImaCow (talk) 16:50, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaarsild in the evening.jpg

[edit]

no Commons:Freedom of panorama in Estonia Wkentaur (talk) 18:11, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto flyer kenzo.jpg

[edit]

According to the description this is a photo of a flyer that was used for a poster. So this is a derived work. Mbch331 (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2 trains formed of B90s and B92s Between Canary Wharf and West India Quay.jpg

[edit]

Blurry and digital zoom, poor quality image Turini2 (talk) 18:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stubby micropenis.jpg

[edit]

COM:NUDE We certainly have enough photos of penises. LevandeMänniska (talk), 19:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry to hear of your deletion request. In my view this micropenis is somewhat unique in that it is fairly thick compared to the others even though it is short in length and as such would be interesting to viewers. Doobie55 (talk) 12:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, no es interesante ser cómplice de su exhibicionismo, mirando su micropene. Borrar.191.126.11.115 13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep quality photograph of a micropenis Dronebogus (talk) 13:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Saual1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NUDE Commons is not a private amateur porn site

LevandeMänniska (talk), 19:36, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep these images, particularly the last one, strike me as more artistic than pornographic. In any case how many high-quality photos of nude, middle-aged, Israeli men do we have? Dronebogus (talk) 13:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree the quality is fine. But the subject of the photo can not be the photographer and therefore we need COM:VRT confirmation of the license. GPSLeo (talk) 09:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Microplastic Consumer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I don't think {{PD-US-1978-89}} applies as it was made by the w:Calgary Herald, which is located in Canada. {{PD-Canada}} states that an image not under Crown Copyright must be created prior to January 1, 1949 or have die prior to January 1, 1972.

reppoptalk 23:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ChatGPT told me that it was published in the Northern USA as well- I guess it was wrong. If there's anything that shows it was distributed in the USA that would be great, if not feel free to delete. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 23:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ChatGPT? Really? I feel that this kind of research should be on your own and in-depth rather than relying on ChatGPT. I don't see anything that suggests that it was published in the Northern US. If it was published in the US as well, it would need to be without a copyright notice and in the public domain in its source country as of URAA date per Commons:Hirtle chart. reppoptalk 17:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did some research but my results were inconclusive or also just AI. The image had no copyright notice or attribution, which led me to mark it as safe.
Could this image from the Canadian police force be in the public domain, Chebib posted this on his public twitter. Microplastic Consumer (talk) 01:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think Canada has government works in the public domain like in the US. Don't think Ontario has any special copyright rules that relates to this. According to Dalhousie University, "In Canada, works produced by the federal and provincial governments are protected by Crown Copyright." reppoptalk 04:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/10/06&oldid=953154736"