Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/05
.svg){kind=link}
_Senator_Myrie_in_the_Senate_Chamber.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
October 5
[edit]
The current version is an exact duplicate of File:EA24 Kirche Hörschel 01.jpg. The retouched version in the file history had been made by myself just as a draft for discussion, and is - in hinesight - too misleading, because the stairs are missing. NearEMPTiness (talk) 02:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1994. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Мисько Еммануїл Петрович. And building built after 1990. No Permission from the architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 05:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Adn also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1990. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 05:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
And also
-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B5%D1%82,_%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D1%96%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82,_%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%B4%D1%96%D1%8F%D1%87,_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B567.JPG){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1995. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
And also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1959. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Бець Володимир Андрійович - died 2017. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1992. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Мельник Володимир Михайлович. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятний знак воїнам-землякам, які загинули в роки Другої світової війни село Зозулинці.jpg
[edit]
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1990. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Мельник Володимир Михайлович. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятний знак воїнам-землякам, які загинули в роки Другої світової війни, село Стінка.jpg
[edit]
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1978. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
And also
.jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1980. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1985. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor П. Зайцев. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No VRT permission. מקף־עברי (talk) 08:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
a PNG format file of the same kind is released. Better quality and no background provided Despechi.ro (talk) 08:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
better version of the file with removed bg was released. Despechi.ro (talk) 08:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
As Austria's freedom-of-panorama exception does NOT generally cover texts, it needs to be evaluated whether the text on the depicted information board is above COM:TOO and thereby needs to be considered as copyrightable or not. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Similar, but probably covered per de minimis :
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Túrelio (talk • contribs)
Keep the second image. Even if it would be copyrighted text, it's hardly readable. Nakonana (talk) 18:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete the first image in my opinion, as I think multiple paragraphs of text specifically written should be above the threshold of originality for textual works. Felix QW (talk) 10:17, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Probably a non-free photo of the 3D object (PD itself), taken from an unknown source. Рhotographer's permission required. Quick1984 (talk) 13:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Source says "Government of Russia", probably to make clear that the depicted order is not self-created, but the photographer might very well be the uploader because Google reverse image search does not yield aby results. The missing exif data can probably be explained by the image being cropped. The software used for cropping might have removed the information. What makes you think that the photo was taken by someone else? Does the user have a history of uploading copyvios? Nakonana (talk) 19:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Why don’t you start your investigation, interviewing the uploader, who must give a verifiable source and the evidence that the image can be considered free? After that we can go back to my doubts, described here. Quick1984 (talk) 19:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- The uploader gave the Government of Russia as a source (probably for the order itself while the photo may well be an own work). What is it that you are asking for for it to be verifiable? Google doesn't find any previous uploads of this photo. You have to have significant doubt for PCP. But what is that doubt based on? The user has a very good record regarding proper licensing as far as I can see. Why should it be different in this case? Nakonana (talk) 19:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- The uploader definitely seems to be using some software that is removing exif data when cropping, see for example File:Gianlorenzo bernini, cappella cornaro, 1644-52, scheletri nel pavimento 01 (modified version).png which is lacking the data of the given source file. However, this modified version and other uploads by this user (e.g.[1][2]) indicate that they are familiar with different licensing templates and are making an effort to clearly state the source and appropriate license. Skimming through some of their uploads I didn't find any suspicious uploads with any obviously incorrect licenses in them. Nakonana (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I would prefer to focus on this particular file instead of joining your far-reaching assumptions and generalizations and get information about the source from the uploader. Quick1984 (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- The user has been active on Commons after this request and appropriate notification, and if he had something to object to, he would, I believe, have already objected, both here and on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Orden Pocheta.jpg. To me this is a signal that both images have a similar - external - origin. Since you are clearly deliberately evading the essence of my answers, I suggest for the last time that you refrain from your guessings and persuading me to participate in them, and address the question of authorship to someone who knows the answer to it. Quick1984 (talk) 20:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Why don’t you start your investigation, interviewing the uploader, who must give a verifiable source and the evidence that the image can be considered free? After that we can go back to my doubts, described here. Quick1984 (talk) 19:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Medal_%22For_Bravery%22_2nd_%D0%A1lass_(Russia).png){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oleg_Baranov_12.12.2017.jpg){kind=link}
Non-free photo of the 3D object (PD itself), taken from third-party website. Own photo or photographer's permission required. Quick1984 (talk) 13:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for modern sculpture. Quick1984 (talk) 13:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Фотография сделана мною в день открытия скульптуры. Gizetdinovki (talk) 08:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Но вы не автор скульптуры. Lesless (talk) 13:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 14:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Canadian law on freedom of panorama does not apply to 2d artworks temporarily on display in a public place, such as this advertising banner in the terminal at the Moncton Airport DS (talk) 15:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
This is a cover of Billboard Magazine—which is stated in the description. This is copyrighted and is not the uploaders own work. Roastedbeanz1 (talk) 15:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
This flag is claimed to be too simple for copyright protection but the hand holding a flower id far from a simple shape. Whpq (talk) 15:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Whpq I copied the licenses on which the logo was sent, I do not understand why someone added the PD-logo there. In Albania, official symbols of public organizations are not protected. Swiãtopôłk (talk) 18:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Whpq During the check I found that the party itself uses the logo without the agreement of the author, who is Spanish. [3] There is no point in discussing the flag, because if the logo is not allowed, then the flag is too. Swiãtopôłk (talk) 13:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete in terms of the complexity of the logo. As for the other public domain claim, Template:PD-Albania-exempt refers to "official bodies", which seems more likely to be agencies of the government rather than political parties that contest control of said government. Unless we have previous case law that says otherwise, the precautionary principle suggests that deletion is the best choice. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Also recommend deleting File:Logo e Partisë Socialiste të Shqipërisë.svg for the same reason. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pangalau as no license (No license) Krd 18:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
_Senator_Myrie_in_the_Senate_Chamber.jpg){kind=link}
_Senator_Myrie_in_the_Senate_Chamber.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BottleOfChocolateMilk as no permission (No permission since) Krd 18:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
_Senator_Myrie_in_the_Senate_Chamber.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by BottleOfChocolateMilk as no permission (No permission since) Krd 18:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Over a month with no responses. What is the point of starting these discussions? BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 17:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Please add this OTRS ticket and keep at least one of the photos, although this file was initially tagged by Little Savage as no permission (No permission since) NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Person in image is requesting deletion. Blervis (talk) 19:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Painting is PD in U.S. but not in home country as author solely died in 1956, should be undeleted in 2027 Wiiformii (talk) 21:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted Disney characters. Full delete or blur them. SDudley (talk) 21:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted Disney characters. Also no category. Invalid license on those characters SDudley (talk) 21:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted Disney characters. Also no category. Invalid license on those characters SDudley (talk) 21:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Not an own work. Author of the image is Vladimir Igoshev (died in 2007). See there. Werter1995 (talk) 21:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
This file is sourced to a National Weather Service website.
Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where the photo originated.
Unfortunately, the citation we have points directly to the image itself and the image itself is no longer published on the NWS site. So although we can verify in the Internet Archive that it was once hosted by the NWS, we no longer have access to its copyright and licensing information.
Because it is unlike the images usually taken by NWS staff in the course of their duties, I reached out the to NWS office that published this photo (Portland).
They do not know who took this photo, and can only "suspect" that it is in the public domain.
I have forwarded this response to the VRT (ticket:2024100510005216).
Because neither we nor the NWS can verify that it is (or was ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found. If it is truly an orphan image, it will enter the public domain 120 years after it was taken or published, probably somewhere around the year 2120.
 | Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Rlandmann (talk) 23:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I found the source website on which the photo was included. The header specifically says the images are in public domain. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:49, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- True, although we need to be cautious about relying on that statement. There are other images in those galleries whose public domain status is dubious; the worst case being this one, which still has an Associated Press watermark...! Now that you've discovered this gallery, I'll poke around a little more to see if we can establish the trustworthiness of that header. --Rlandmann (talk) 11:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
