Commons:Deletion requests/2024/10/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

October 5

[edit]

I dunno which iteration this Hall of Fame plaque of Ted Williams is. However, the one that Williams held in 1966 (Getty Images) isn't the same one as seen in this photo. The plaque looks shinier and newer, and Williams is positioned differently from the 1966 one. This plaque may be copyrighted and lacks FOP per COM:FOP US. George Ho (talk) 00:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The person who is pictured is an internet meme/lolcow who has been determined to not have the notability necessary for an article on Wikipedia, this picture resultingly serves no purpose since it can never feasibly be linked to anything. Thebirdlover (talk) 00:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This person who is pictured is an internet meme/lolcow who has been determined to not have the notability necessary for an article on Wikipedia, this picture resultingly serves no purpose since it can never feasibly be linked to anything. Thebirdlover (talk) 00:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo, out of scope P 1 9 9   00:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A formal PR picture of an Israeli businessman, clearly taken by a photographer and appears on his LinkedIn and YouTube pages. Without a proper VRT (formerly, OTRS) release note, it cannot stay in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 01:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

taken from instagram GioviPen GP msg 01:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

as per File:Simoke 1.jpg GioviPen GP msg 01:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A formal PR picture of an Israeli businessman, clearly taken by a photographer and appears on his LinkedIn and YouTube pages. Without a proper VRT (formerly, OTRS) release note, it cannot stay in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 01:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

taken for instagram, same as File:Simoke 2.jpg GioviPen GP msg 01:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and not matching author from descr and exif GioviPen GP msg 01:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not valid vrt because file got reuploaded and replaced. This file was initially tagged by GiovanniPen as no license (No license since) GioviPen GP msg 01:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Claims to be from SoundCloud (see edit summary), which isn't under a compatible license. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 01:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9   01:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This is an official report which was published as a PDF, not a user-created document. Omphalographer (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sereenaaaaaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal notes, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   01:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely not own work: distorted screengrab. P 1 9 9   01:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dimas ederzon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable event/people, no educational value, out of scope. And personality right issues as well.

P 1 9 9   01:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. And out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bmoy94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos of non-notable persons and office, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   02:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of non-notable event/persons, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused random photo of nondescript laptop, no context, no educational use, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Maestato (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screenshot images without EXIF data, several with watermark not matching uploader.

P 1 9 9   02:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photoshopped image of a pig, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Michele-2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text docs, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   02:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Duran ste8972 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text docs/forms, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   02:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-res diagram without context, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by AxelMariam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-res diagrams without clear purpose, no educational value, unusable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   02:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by NOWAK Richard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-res diagrams without clear purpose, COM:WEBHOST, unusable, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   02:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by J.SA13D021 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text diagrams, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   02:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by HJM94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   02:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Playmobil COM:TOYS. P 1 9 9   02:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of non-notable event/people, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of non-notable event/person, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused bookcover image of non-notable publication, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The current version is an exact duplicate of File:EA24 Kirche Hörschel 01.jpg. The retouched version in the file history had been made by myself just as a draft for discussion, and is - in hinesight - too misleading, because the stairs are missing. NearEMPTiness (talk) 02:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader of this photo is apparently claiming to be both its subject, author and copyright holder. This looks more like an official team photo and it's unlikely that he subject holds its copyright. Denniscabrams (talk) 02:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

uploaded by mistake. Jatinder kumar chauhan (talk) 03:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Selfie, uploaded 5 years ago,  Delete out of courtesy. --Achim55 (talk) 18:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation: https://gingkhai.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it by mistake Marcons (talk) 03:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Marcons (talk) 03:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Marcons (talk) 03:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio. This was published with a copyright notice. See here for its entry on TCDB and here for an image of the reverse of the card with a copyright notice. Denniscabrams (talk) 04:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Steven YT OFFICIAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: personal / fictitious flag and emblem. Can't find any evidence this is a real organization.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by CKirby09 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: entirely unclear what "pro world cup" these maps, logos, and other graphics refer to; editing history on enwiki suggests they may be a personal fiction.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused image of text. Omphalographer (talk) 04:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: fictitious / personal flag. Omphalographer (talk) 04:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation; one of the source images has already been deleted for copyright reasons. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 05:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there free image available that replaces File:Terorisme.jpg? 103.156.248.45 06:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah well, it's probably a derivative work of things that were created in South Korea anyway since that's where the event was at. There's still the other image that's already been deleted as COPYVIO even if I grant you the stamp is PD though. Plus Euro coins and banknotes are copyrighted, File:Queen mum afuit.jpg looks like a screenshot from video and I wouldn't be surprised if it's copyrighted to. File:Компьютерная реконструкция столкновения самолётов над Боденским озером.png is apparently from a computer program. Again, one that's probably copyrighted. Etc. Etc. You get my point, but in no way does deleting the image hinge on the stamp. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep and remove offending images. The file is very widely COM:INUSE Dronebogus (talk) 10:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No source for public domain assertion RachelTensions (talk) 05:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nudity, this picture is a copyrighted work used in older Malabar records. Error.changes.io (talk) 14:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 20:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This work is copyright protected, and no permission to publish in a public platform since 19th century Error.changes.io (talk) 05:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. All indications are that this photo is in the public domain. Omphalographer (talk) 16:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Error.changes.io, please give up. These deletion requests are disruptive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Copyrighted books with wrong filenames

05:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1994. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Мисько Еммануїл Петрович. And building built after 1990. No Permission from the architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 05:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adn also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1990. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 05:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use." Kinu (talk) 06:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use." Kinu (talk) 06:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1995. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality. Redundant to SVG and PNG variants.

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are we discussing this? It seems non-controversial being redundant. Isn't there a deletion rule that covers deleting this? rogerd (talk) 14:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It can be only deleted speedily if they are of the same file format. See COM:DUPE. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 01:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality. Redundant to File:Headquarters Command.png --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, outside project scope Poliocretes (talk) 06:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1959. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Бець Володимир Андрійович - died 2017. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:Pink 91119

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request -- Author deletion request; work no longer wanted under Creative Commons copyright license/public access. Pink 91119 (talk) 07:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Pink_91119[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1992. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Мельник Володимир Михайлович. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1990. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Мельник Володимир Михайлович. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1994. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor Yaroslav Holets. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably copyright infringement. Missing VRT confirmation. מקף־עברי (talk) 07:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1978. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1980. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should be under Fair Use, not Creative Commons (since there is no VRT permission) מקף־עברי (talk) 07:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1985. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor П. Зайцев. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:57, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1961. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 08:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No VRT permission. מקף־עברי (talk) 08:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No VRT permission. מקף־עברי (talk) 08:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

a PNG format file of the same kind is released. Better quality and no background provided Despechi.ro (talk) 08:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

better version of the file with removed bg was released. Despechi.ro (talk) 08:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Прошу удалить загруженное мной изображение по причине , что на нём отсутствует сам мост, загрузил по ошибке Well-read MountainMan (talk) 08:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Bosnia and Herzegovina. See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Bosnia_and_Herzegovina#Freedom_of_panorama. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 08:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

因為GOOGLE能搜尋到舊的版本 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taibus (talk • contribs) 01:04, 3 October 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

因為GOOGLE能搜尋到舊的版本 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taibus (talk • contribs) 01:05, 3 October 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

As the depicted church-building looks to be recent and above threshold of originality and as Italy has no freedom-of-panorama exception, it needs to be evaluated whether this image is o.k. or violates the copyright of the architect. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wonderfulearth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User blocked for copyright violations. Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 09:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As Austria's freedom-of-panorama exception does NOT generally cover texts, it needs to be evaluated whether the text on the depicted information board is above COM:TOO and thereby needs to be considered as copyrightable or not. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar, but probably covered per de minimis :

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Túrelio (talk • contribs)

 Keep the second image. Even if it would be copyrighted text, it's hardly readable. Nakonana (talk) 18:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

empty category — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehrlich91 (talk • contribs) 08:20, 5 October 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Keep To be fair, you emptied it. The creator even reverted you, but you reverted their revert.[1] What's the point of that? The monastery exists and it had a subcategory (which I now re-added btw). The creator of the category has uploaded plenty of photos from churches and monasteries in North Macedonia; they might very well upload more such photos in the future, including photos of the Optičari Monastery. This monastery also has a Wikidata item and its category was properly categorized (before your blanking of the page). I don't see the point of deleting such a category. Nakonana (talk) 19:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You also didn't notify the creator of the category (someone else did that for you), and you nominated the category for deletion only 3 days after it was created. Usually we assume that someone plans to populate a category when they create it, so we give them some time before deciding that it should be deleted. But in this case that's not even necessary because the category in fact already did have a subcategory. Nakonana (talk) 19:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong title. Please delete. I'll be re-uploading with the correct title. Thanks. Rosiestep (talk) 10:04, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosiestep! How about we move the file to the desired title, instead of deleting and then re-uploading? --Ratekreel (talk) 10:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ratekreel, I should have been clearer. The title slide in the slidedeck had the wrong title, which is why I uploaded the slidedeck with the wrong file name. I fixed the title on the google slidedeck, and then uploaded a new file (WCNA 2024. Sister Projects - opening? closing? merging? splitting?.pdf) I'll be presenting this slidedeck today at WCNA. Thanks! --Rosiestep (talk) 14:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense. --Ratekreel (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very "unsafe" work for Wikimedia, putting the Wikimedia Foundation at risk of expensive lawsuits NotTheRealShaneFontaine (talk) 10:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Copyrighted 1993 sculpture, no FOP in US. Omphalographer (talk) 16:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking evidence of a free license. Likely copyrighted file, with no given information of the author and source (see file page). There is also a visible copyright symbol on the file itself which reads "© & ™ Green Gold". Ratekreel (talk) 10:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Useless and incorrect redirection — '''[[User:Jules*|<span style="color:#FF7E42">Ju</span><span style="color:#FF5F42">le</span><span style="color:#F82621">s*</span>]]''' <sup><small style="border-bottom:1px solid">[[User talk:Jules*|<span style="color:#000">talk</span>]]</small></sup> (talk) 10:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No CC license on YouTube. ScarletViolet (talk) 11:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This map is inaccurate and outdated. It does not list the number of Indian reservations which are held in trust by the U.S. government. There’s a far better map here that can be used that actually identifies federal land. Either edit this or delete this map entirely. 2600:100C:A209:D108:1D73:940E:7359:63A7 12:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. No valid reason for deletion. Omphalographer (talk) 16:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivatives, COM:PACKAGING.

Quick1984 (talk) 12:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a non-free photo of the 3D object (PD itself), taken from an unknown source. Рhotographer's permission required. Quick1984 (talk) 13:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source says "Government of Russia", probably to make clear that the depicted order is not self-created, but the photographer might very well be the uploader because Google reverse image search does not yield aby results. The missing exif data can probably be explained by the image being cropped. The software used for cropping might have removed the information. What makes you think that the photo was taken by someone else? Does the user have a history of uploading copyvios? Nakonana (talk) 19:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why don’t you start your investigation, interviewing the uploader, who must give a verifiable source and the evidence that the image can be considered free? After that we can go back to my doubts, described here. Quick1984 (talk) 19:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader gave the Government of Russia as a source (probably for the order itself while the photo may well be an own work). What is it that you are asking for for it to be verifiable? Google doesn't find any previous uploads of this photo. You have to have significant doubt for PCP. But what is that doubt based on? The user has a very good record regarding proper licensing as far as I can see. Why should it be different in this case? Nakonana (talk) 19:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader definitely seems to be using some software that is removing exif data when cropping, see for example File:Gianlorenzo bernini, cappella cornaro, 1644-52, scheletri nel pavimento 01 (modified version).png which is lacking the data of the given source file. However, this modified version and other uploads by this user (e.g.[2][3]) indicate that they are familiar with different licensing templates and are making an effort to clearly state the source and appropriate license. Skimming through some of their uploads I didn't find any suspicious uploads with any obviously incorrect licenses in them. Nakonana (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer to focus on this particular file instead of joining your far-reaching assumptions and generalizations and get information about the source from the uploader. Quick1984 (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The user has been active on Commons after this request and appropriate notification, and if he had something to object to, he would, I believe, have already objected, both here and on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Orden Pocheta.jpg. To me this is a signal that both images have a similar - external - origin. Since you are clearly deliberately evading the essence of my answers, I suggest for the last time that you refrain from your guessings and persuading me to participate in them, and address the question of authorship to someone who knows the answer to it. Quick1984 (talk) 20:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photo of the 3D object (PD itself), taken from third-party website. Own photo or photographer's permission required. Quick1984 (talk) 13:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cross wiki promo spam for this person non free image reupload copied from youtube/amazon see here by locked promo sock farm see nl:Overleg gebruiker:Hristijan Kicho/blockmsg. Duplicate of File:Aleksandar Saša Trajkovski.jpg see file here and checkuser file here Hoyanova (talk) 13:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP in Russia for modern sculpture. Quick1984 (talk) 13:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{No source since|month=October|day=5|year=2024}} We don't know the copyright of this image, but by the looks of it, it is a photocopy from a map in a printed paper book from the 20th century. Therefore, it is quite likely that the copyright holder has not yet deceased 70+ years ago. It could be something else, e.g. a photo from a map hanging on a wall in a museum that is somehow PD. But we can't assume that. Per COM:PCP, we should delete files without a clear indication of its legal status. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 13:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverse image searched the image and it turned out be to be a photo of an another file on Commons, BUT that file is uploaded in 2022, and this one was uploaded in 2007. Plus, by the pixelated text it should be made in the 90s-late 2000s. Other reverse search results brings to a forum created in 2010, 3 years after the upload of this file. The uploader probably had captured this from a computer that was on a defunct website. Josemite (talk) 09:43, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 14:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


reupload of non free image copied from youtube/amazon see here by locked promo sock farm see nl:Overleg gebruiker:Hristijan Kicho/blockmsg. Duplicate of File:Aleksandar Saša Trajkovski.jpg Hoyanova (talk) 14:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Taken from YT. A09 (talk) 18:08, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image uploaded by Swedish problem user who doesn't seem to understand the concept of free licenses. Tournesol (talk) 15:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian law on freedom of panorama does not apply to 2d artworks temporarily on display in a public place, such as this advertising banner in the terminal at the Moncton Airport DS (talk) 15:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content is raw text only, thus out of scope. Yasu (talk) 15:22, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that this is a copyright infrignement, because it uses proprietary modules of SimCity4, or is the creativity of its user, who just used the software to create this "custom scenery"? 109.71.220.186 15:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Substantially a derivative work of the video game artwork. Omphalographer (talk) 16:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a cover of Billboard Magazine—which is stated in the description. This is copyrighted and is not the uploaders own work. Roastedbeanz1 (talk) 15:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hunamitrabha15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work but these photos have no exif and are wildly different resolutions. All other contributions from this editor are copyright violations.

Whpq (talk) 15:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This flag is claimed to be too simple for copyright protection but the hand holding a flower id far from a simple shape. Whpq (talk) 15:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq I copied the licenses on which the logo was sent, I do not understand why someone added the PD-logo there. In Albania, official symbols of public organizations are not protected. Swiãtopôłk (talk) 18:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Whpq During the check I found that the party itself uses the logo without the agreement of the author, who is Spanish. [4] There is no point in discussing the flag, because if the logo is not allowed, then the flag is too. Swiãtopôłk (talk) 13:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete in terms of the complexity of the logo. As for the other public domain claim, Template:PD-Albania-exempt refers to "official bodies", which seems more likely to be agencies of the government rather than political parties that contest control of said government. Unless we have previous case law that says otherwise, the precautionary principle suggests that deletion is the best choice. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also recommend deleting File:Logo e Partisë Socialiste të Shqipërisë.svg for the same reason.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Urheberrechtsverletzung, siehe https://pizzaundpolitik.de/impressum/ 2A01:5241:70A:7600:0:0:0:48EF 16:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 3D works in Japan, artist Kan Yasuda is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in Japan, artist Kan Yasuda is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in Japan, artist Kan Yasuda is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 16:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in Japan, installed in 2006 A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 16:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Personal photo used for self-promotion. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 16:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Screenshot of non-free content A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the original uploader and no longer want this image to be available. Aadamaas (talk) 16:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 3D works in Japan, artist Tony Cragg is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D/3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 16:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 16:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 16:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Pierre Laroche est mort en 1982. Lyokoï (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if this was published in "the 1980 Holyoke Millers program" (whatever that means), then I don't see any reason for its copyright to have expired (it's blatantly not uploader's own work). DS (talk) 16:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope, watermarked and filtered image, no descr, no info GioviPen GP msg 17:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, copyviol, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 17:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 17:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Earthyspirit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: various unused, esoteric diagrams drawing connections between the alphabet, the classical elements, and various other topics. None of this appears to relate to any organized system of belief.

Omphalographer (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 17:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of de:Benno Eggert, who died in 1983. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2054.

Rosenzweig τ 18:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Obvious copyright violation as this is not the uploader's own work, instead the author of the photo is crown88 (the watermark can be seen at the bottom centre of the photo) and it can be found on different social medias and websites Bloomingbyungchan (talk) 18:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No proof of permission and also GFDL is no longer a valid license on Commons since 2018. MGA73 (talk) 18:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Pangalau as no license (No license) Krd 18:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since) Krd 18:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by BottleOfChocolateMilk as no permission (No permission since) Krd 18:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by BottleOfChocolateMilk as no permission (No permission since) Krd 18:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are scans of articles and photographs from 1989 German newspapers. The articles and photographs will still be copyrighted for decades, so these are copyvios, and the files should be deleted.

Rosenzweig τ 19:05, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These ca. 1968 slides from Germany are still protected by copyright, so the file is a copyvio and should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 19:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 19:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please add this OTRS ticket and keep at least one of the photos, although this file was initially tagged by Little Savage as no permission (No permission since) NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dark, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 19:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dark, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 19:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo? out of scope GioviPen GP msg 19:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Person in image is requesting deletion. Blervis (talk) 19:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

uploaded as own work when it is obviously the logo of a club, only use was on a now-deleted spam page on en.wp Just Step Sideways (talk) 19:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution professional quality image, user's only upload, also the official image at https://fable.co/author/roger-berkowitz. I can't guarantee it was snarfed from there without copyright permission, but it does seem likely. GRuban (talk) 20:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality diagrams without context. Not realistically useful for educational purposes, out of project scope. Commons is not a webhost. COM:NOTHOST

~TheImaCow (talk) 14:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 10:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low quality diagrams generally without context. Out of project scope.

~TheImaCow (talk) 20:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fake flag of a non-existent entity, used in a hoax on en.wp which was deleted some time ago Just Step Sideways (talk) 20:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: this appears to be an AI-generated image, not a real photo of the tower. Omphalographer (talk) 20:17, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kenneth Alarcón (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: various nonsensical AI-generated images of planets being destroyed; cover of a self-published book. All unused outside a userspace sandbox.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Si, voy a esperar el tiempo para que eliminen las de IA y voy a ir subiendo las que he realizado en el libro. Kenneth Alarcón (talk) 22:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:27, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:30, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:33, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:34, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no file exist Javidd (talk) 20:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook is the source per metadata. Abzeronow (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author of the photo is clearly not the person on the picture (as said in "author" field). No source provided. Andriy.v (talk) 21:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph of a labtop keyboard, and what appears to be a portable storage device of sort. Uploader's only contribution. Uncat since 2017, and potential educational use seems minimal. Abzeronow (talk) 21:14, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It has not been identified for seven years so the chances are it never will be.. Looks like an abandoned photo with little or no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 16:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did anyone actually ever try to identify it, 'cause it took me less than a minute to find it. It's a vape pen. See [5][6] Nakonana (talk) 21:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and it's potentially a promotional upload because as my first link indicates this is a vape pen by the company Ald Amaze — which also happens to be the uploader's user name... But we also only have one other image of a cannabis vaporizer (which this seems to be, though, some websites call it a "hybrid" — I'm guessing for e-cigarettes and cannabis). Nakonana (talk) 21:12, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think we should care if someone working for the company uploaded it, if it's potentially useful. Seems like we should  Keep the photo if there's no copyright issue, which I doubt there is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Painting is PD in U.S. but not in home country as author solely died in 1956, should be undeleted in 2027 Wiiformii (talk) 21:28, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted Disney characters. Full delete or blur them. SDudley (talk) 21:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted Disney characters. Also no category. Invalid license on those characters SDudley (talk) 21:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted Disney characters. Also no category. Invalid license on those characters SDudley (talk) 21:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a own work. Author of the image is Vladimir Igoshev (died in 2007). See there. Werter1995 (talk) 21:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo press photo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 21:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo press photo, out of scope; as per File:TomColontonio 2015.jpg GioviPen GP msg 21:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, dw, watermark, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 22:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

promo, probably dw, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 22:19, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

italian unrelevant man, promo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 22:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

spam, promo, out of scope GioviPen GP msg 22:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of two bags of copyrighted packaging graphics ~Gwennie🐈💬 📋22:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bad quality hand drawn map of Tropical Storm Milton track while there is File:Milton 2024 path.png that does a better job. Pierre cb (talk) 23:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Completely unusable. Omphalographer (talk) 04:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per above. --Zzzs (talk) 15:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is sourced to a National Weather Service website.

Such sites host a mixture of content created by the US federal government (public domain) and content created by businesses and private individuals (a wide variety of free and unfree licenses). We rely on the captions they were published with to tell us where the photo originated.

Unfortunately, the citation we have points directly to the image itself and the image itself is no longer published on the NWS site. So although we can verify in the Internet Archive that it was once hosted by the NWS, we no longer have access to its copyright and licensing information.

Because it is unlike the images usually taken by NWS staff in the course of their duties, I reached out the to NWS office that published this photo (Portland).

They do not know who took this photo, and can only "suspect" that it is in the public domain.

I have forwarded this response to the VRT (ticket:2024100510005216).

Because neither we nor the NWS can verify that it is (or was ever) available under a free license, we must delete as a precaution unless the precise creator and evidence of permission can be found. If it is truly an orphan image, it will enter the public domain 120 years after it was taken or published, probably somewhere around the year 2120.


Rlandmann (talk) 23:21, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per @Rlandmann. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 02:19, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope: unused fictional election apportionment diagram for 2004 Hamburg state election, wrong numbers (see also file talk page). 2003:E5:370D:C300:71BC:1855:137D:6946 23:58, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]