Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

September 27

[edit]

Per COM:PCP this looks like a staged press image ViperSnake151 (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Own work seems plausible to me; the original uploader has a number of other clearly self-taken photos of similar vehicles on Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 02:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete TinEye reports that same photo on [1] on Nov 5, 2017 and [2] on Sep 17, 2017. File was uploaded to enwiki on 7 August 2017, with no Exif metadata and not a particularly big resolution (it claims to have been cropped from an earlier image). The uploader being McChizzle gives it credibility, though, but I'd prefer some more evidence. Platonides (talk) 23:37, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ankle_sprain_--_Smart-Servier_(cropped).jpg Tikmok (talk) 03:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Own work? 186.175.46.128 03:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag is purely fictitious and there is no reliable source or evidentiary evidence that the blue ensign was used in the Yukon Territory before 1965. 反共抗獨光復民國 (talk) 05:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This was probably an image I made to convert a gif/png image into SVG and probably didn't know about its existence. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So I recommend deleting this file as soon as possible, because at the same time the Northwest Territories did not have any official flag, and the same goes for the Yukon. 反共抗獨光復民國 (talk) 11:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, this flag image is currently in use across a number of wikis. It'll need to be replaced or removed there before it can be deleted from Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 16:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can I request deletion now? I found that very few protected wiki projects are still using it. Can you leave a message to discuss with the administrators of the wiki projects that are still using it? 反共抗獨光復民國 (talk) 03:52, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Unfortunately, COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV are quite strict. As long as any sister project deems a file usable and it is in use, we don't judge on accurateness or correctness of the content, so we have to keep the file for now. It's currently still in use in the Sorani Kurdish, Hebrew, and Vietnamese Wikipedia. I would be willing to discount the use in Indonesian and Norwegian Wikipedia, as these seem to be only remnants in templates. As soon as it's not longer in use in the three mentioned language versions, you can file a new deletion request. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:10, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This flag is purely fictitious and there is no reliable source or evidentiary evidence that the blue ensign was used in the Yukon Territory before 1968. Therefore I recommend deleting this file quickly and removing it from all referenced pages. 反共抗獨光復民國 (talk) 03:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is still in use on a few projects. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I agree that the flag is fictitious and misleading. Fry1989 eh? 15:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To quote my closing comment from the last request: "Unfortunately, COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV are quite strict. As long as any sister project deems a file usable and it is in use, we don't judge on accurateness or correctness of the content, so we have to keep the file for now." This still applies. First, convince the other projects that this is not an usable file, then it can be deleted. I'm leaving this request for another admin to close as I closed the previous one. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not CC License 2601:201:8300:8E30:2043:1F:9D8E:D1C9 03:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

have newer version (:File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-kge-Latn.png) 미솔파 (talk) 03:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"All rights reserved" on the source website, illegal licence washing Mateus2019 (talk) 06:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mateus2019: Hi, isn't [3] this the photographer? Do you have a direct link to the photo, there are hundreds, I don't see it. - Grtz. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 12:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: It seems clear to me that en:User:Redsimon is Simon GP Geoghegan, who also runs https://redsimon.co.uk/. For instance, the very fuzzy photos on http://www.redsimon.info/photosimon.htm look rather like the person on the user page above. It's perfectly legitimate for someone to release pictures here under a more liberal licence than they use on their own site. --bjh21 (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
see extif data: "Online copyright statement" and "Copyright holder

Photograph created by Simon GP Geoghegan, October 2007". Redsimon needs to be asked about these contrary information. cannot find the URL of redsimon where this car is pictured anymore. Greetings, --Mateus2019 (talk) 12:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) Krd 08:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep probably beneath the TOO for Japan. Dronebogus (talk) 01:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


شعار عشيرة  Mohammed Qays  🗣 08:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

صورة لها حقوق  Mohammed Qays  🗣 08:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

صورة لها حقوق  Mohammed Qays  🗣 08:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is copyrighted Sayon Hazra (talk) 11:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You had claimed it was your own work when you uploaded it. Can you clarify? Platonides (talk) 23:46, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Till (talk) 11:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ARIF BARLAS65 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per what Commons is not.

Saqib (talk) 13:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you, Saqib! What's wrong with File:QUEENS GALLERY.jpg and File:SCHOOL FOUNDED IN 1648.jpg? Also, the man is such a small part of File:DUNDEE 4.jpg and possibly File:FAKHAR 5.jpg that they might be kept as useful in spite of his being in the pictures. That is, if the uploader actually took the photos. If he's claiming the photos with him in them are selfies, that's definitely not credible, but the ones without him in them may genuinely be own work. Your comments, User:ARIF BARLAS65? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Respected Saqib, what you think is as per your criteria. Keep it, rest should be discarded. I own all those pics. ARIF BARLAS65 (talk) 16:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:ARIF BARLAS65, the question isn't who owns the pictures; the question is who owns the copyright to them. You obviously didn't take pictures with yourself in them, so those have to be deleted unless you can prove to COM:VRT that you own the copyright or the photographer contacts them to give permission for a usable license. Meanwhile, did you shoot the photos that do not show you or did someone else shoot them? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

per what Commons is not Saqib (talk) 13:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • The rest of this series should be deleted per nom, but why is a photo of two boys playing in the mud not in scope? The title should be changed, but that's not a deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That doesn't look like studying to me? Not that a wrong filename can't be fixed, of course. It is tagged as Wiki Loves Monuments 2021, but I don't see a monument there. Probably own work, though. Platonides (talk) 00:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Complex Checkered flag is borderline TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Плохо склеенная панорама Храмы и монастыри (talk) 16:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

А лучше имеется? Вроде бы нормально выглядит. Nakonana (talk) 16:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the description, the photo is by George Osner, not Fabrice Florin, the person who posted it to Flickr. Nosferattus (talk) 16:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that the uploader is the creator of the logo, or that they have a licence to sublicence it. Janhrach (talk) 16:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that the uploader is the creator of the logo, or that they have a licence to sublicence it. Janhrach (talk) 16:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Mongolia44 17:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added PD-text because it's just an image placeholder consisting of a circle with the text "No image available" in the Bashkir language. There's nothing artistic about it, it's just plain text written in an ordinary font. Nakonana (talk) 16:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Publié en mars 2019 dans la presse Cf https://www.ouest-france.fr/bretagne/quimper-29000/portrait-avec-le-cd-livre-kan-ar-bed-arnaud-elegoet-modernise-le-breton-6257218. Autorisation de reproduction non explicite. Limfjord69 (talk) 17:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Kanna Hashimoto in 2014 (cropped file)

[edit]

Cropped the photos with "CropTool", but there are many unused files. YeBoy371 (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable organization, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely not own work: visual characteristics suggest screengrab, and credit in dscription not matching the uploader. P 1 9 9   18:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rechtman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scans of various documents, not own works. Please read COM:DW and fix the sources, the dates, and the licenses.

Yann (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An 1868 ketubah would be public domain, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dieses Foto zeigt nicht Vojtech Pokorny, um den es in dem Artikel geht. 2003:EC:DF0C:D9E6:40FE:10E6:87B8:5298 20:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file name and description might actually be correct because there appear to be two people with that name — one German/Austrian cinematographer, and one Czech philosopher (see Wikidata:Q2530561 vs Wikidata:Q54359155, compare the different dates of birth). However, the nominated image has another issue: it appears to be a copyvio as there's a copyright notice in the exif data and the name of the photographer does not match the uploader's name. Nakonana (talk) 18:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of the copyrighted artwork, no FoP in Russia for such works. Quick1984 (talk) 21:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]