Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2017/04

Donald Tusk, portrait photograph

View Nominated by: Philip Terry Graham (talk) on 2017-04-01 23:00 (UTC) Scope: Donald Tusk, portrait photograph Used in: Premierzy Polski (pl) · Spotkania zagraniczne premiera Donalda Tuska (pl) · Wicemarszałek Sejmu (pl) · Liste der Ministerpräsidenten Polens (de) · ポーランドの首相一覧 (ja) Scores: 1. Donald Tusk 2009-01-01.jpg: 0 <-- 2. Donald Tusk 2012-04-26.jpg: -1 3. Donald Tusk (6165309851).jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 4. Donald Tusk at the EPP Summit 13 December 2007.jpg: -1 => File:Donald Tusk 2009-01-01.jpg: Undecided. <-- File:Donald Tusk 2012-04-26.jpg: Undecided. File:Donald Tusk (6165309851).jpg: Undecided (remains as current VI). File:Donald Tusk at the EPP Summit 13 December 2007.jpg: Undecided. --DeFacto (talk). 19:01, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View Nominated by: Philip Terry Graham (talk) on 2017-04-01 23:00 (UTC) Scope: Donald Tusk, portrait photograph Used in: Primer Ministru de Polonia (ast) · List of Prime Ministers of Poland (en) · Luettelo Puolan pääministereistä (fi) · Gouvernement Tusk II (fr) · Listo di chefministri di Polonia (io) · Lista dels primièrs ministres de Polonha (oc) · Drugi rząd Donalda Tuska (pl) · Список прем'єр-міністрів Польщі (uk) · 波兰总理 (zh)  Oppose I could not nominate this image due to poor colouring oversaturation and possibly ghost effects(?). Needs re-enhancement. The fact it came from File:V.Dombrovksis un Polijas premjerministrs Donalds Tusks (6968957474).jpg doesn't make this image better. --George Ho (talk) 16:39, 2 April 2017 (UTC); edited. 16:41, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. Donald Tusk 2009-01-01.jpg: 0 2. Donald Tusk 2012-04-26.jpg: -1 <-- 3. Donald Tusk (6165309851).jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 4. Donald Tusk at the EPP Summit 13 December 2007.jpg: -1 => File:Donald Tusk 2009-01-01.jpg: Undecided. File:Donald Tusk 2012-04-26.jpg: Undecided. <-- File:Donald Tusk (6165309851).jpg: Undecided (remains as current VI). File:Donald Tusk at the EPP Summit 13 December 2007.jpg: Undecided. --DeFacto (talk). 19:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View Nominated by: Philip Terry Graham (talk) on 2017-04-01 23:00 (UTC) Scope: Donald Tusk, portrait photograph Used in: sv:Europeiska rådet Previous reviews Result: 1 support, 2 oppose => declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 22 March 2017 (UTC) Result: 3 support, 1 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. Donald Tusk 2009-01-01.jpg: 0 2. Donald Tusk 2012-04-26.jpg: -1 3. Donald Tusk (6165309851).jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 4. Donald Tusk at the EPP Summit 13 December 2007.jpg: -1 => File:Donald Tusk 2009-01-01.jpg: Undecided. File:Donald Tusk 2012-04-26.jpg: Undecided. File:Donald Tusk (6165309851).jpg: Undecided (remains as current VI). <-- File:Donald Tusk at the EPP Summit 13 December 2007.jpg: Undecided. --DeFacto (talk). 19:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View Nominated by: Philip Terry Graham (talk) on 2017-04-01 23:00 (UTC) Scope: Donald Tusk, portrait photograph  Oppose I even did not nominate this photo because... the colours look poor. --George Ho (talk) 16:46, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. Donald Tusk 2009-01-01.jpg: 0 2. Donald Tusk 2012-04-26.jpg: -1 3. Donald Tusk (6165309851).jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 4. Donald Tusk at the EPP Summit 13 December 2007.jpg: -1 <-- => File:Donald Tusk 2009-01-01.jpg: Undecided. File:Donald Tusk 2012-04-26.jpg: Undecided. File:Donald Tusk (6165309851).jpg: Undecided (remains as current VI). File:Donald Tusk at the EPP Summit 13 December 2007.jpg: Undecided. <-- --DeFacto (talk). 19:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Pyrus pyrifolia (Asian Pear) Raja cultivar inflorescence

View promotion Nominated by: PumpkinSky talk on 2017-03-12 12:50 (UTC) Scope: Pyrus pyrifolia (Asian Pear) Raja cultivar inflorescence Reason: For MVR, a better version of current Raja cultivar VI File:Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom.jpg. This is a cropped version of File:Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom7.jpg. All current photos in category Pyrus pyrifolia that are of the Raja cultivar are photos of the same tree and start with the name "Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) ....". -- PumpkinSky talk  Support - This is the best of the three, marginally better than the uncropped version. I suppose it's best in scope, although File:Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom5.jpg is another contender that could have been included in this faceoff. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) 2. Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom7.jpg: -1 3. Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom7crop.jpg: +1 <-- => File:Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom7.jpg: Declined. File:Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom7crop.jpg: Promoted. <-- --DeFacto (talk). 18:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment putting up for MVR as I think the other photo may be better than this one, though both have strong points. PumpkinSky talk 21:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)  Support - Still most useful of the two, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom7crop.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) inflorescence-fruit buds.jpg: -1 => File:Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom7crop.jpg: Promoted and thus remains as current VI. <-- File:Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) inflorescence-fruit buds.jpg: Declined. --DeFacto (talk). 19:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View opposition Nominated by: PumpkinSky talk on 2017-03-30 21:23 (UTC) Scope: Pyrus pyrifolia (Asian Pear) Raja cultivar inflorescence Reason: I think this may be better than the current VI in this scope, so I'm putting up a MVR for the two photos. The details are better and sharper in this one. PumpkinSky talk 21:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC) -- PumpkinSky talk  Oppose - Looks like a different variety, given the much darker anthers, but I guess it's just later in the season. In any event, I don't think it's either as clear a picture or as good a composition as the other one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)  Comment @Ikan Kekek: thanks for the comment. The anthers are a different color because they're starting to die off. This happens concurrent with the fruits starting to grow. This is the exact same tree as the other photo. PumpkinSky talk 02:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom7crop.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) 2. Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) inflorescence-fruit buds.jpg: -1 <-- => File:Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) blossom7crop.jpg: Promoted and thus remains as current VI. File:Pyrus pyrifolia (Raja) inflorescence-fruit buds.jpg: Declined. <-- --DeFacto (talk). 19:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Taslima Nasrin

View opposition Nominated by: Vera (talk) on 2012-06-09 12:51 (UTC) Scope: Taslima Nasrin Used in: en:Taslima Nasrin  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 13:35, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:45, 13 June 2012 (UTC)  Comment Re-open for MVR. ~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)  Oppose The other candidate is better to illustrate a Wikipedia article. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. Taslima Nasrin5.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Taslima Nasrin par Claude Truong-Ngoc novembre 2013.jpg: +2 => File:Taslima Nasrin5.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Taslima Nasrin par Claude Truong-Ngoc novembre 2013.jpg: Promoted. --DeFacto (talk). 19:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Daphne Lantier (talk) on 2017-04-05 18:45 (UTC) Scope: Taslima Nasrin Used in: 10 article usages  Best in Scope ~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)  Support Best as profile image for a Wikipedia article. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. Taslima Nasrin5.jpg: -1 (current VI within same scope) 2. Taslima Nasrin par Claude Truong-Ngoc novembre 2013.jpg: +2 <-- => File:Taslima Nasrin5.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. File:Taslima Nasrin par Claude Truong-Ngoc novembre 2013.jpg: Promoted. <-- --DeFacto (talk). 19:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Yasmine Belkaid

View opposition Nominated by: Yann (talk) on 2017-04-07 22:05 (UTC) Scope: Yasmine Belkaid, portrait photograph  Oppose This file isn't in use. File:2017-03-31 - Yasmine-Belkaid - 1340.jpg, by the same photographer, is used, has better lighting, and doesn't have someone else's shoulder in the frame. Daphne Lantier 22:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC) Yes, I thought about that, but 1. I don't think the light is bad here; 2. The expression is nicer; 3. The fact that it isn't currently in use is not a criteria, and it could change anyway. I will set up a MVR. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:32, 8 April 2017 (UTC)  Support - More in focus, better photo. The fact that another photo is in use is not a relevant argument in establishing which image is best in scope or more useful. Please dispense with that as a comparative argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)  Oppose - I honestly don't see the technical differences that Ikan Kekek sees. Voting in favor of File:2017-03-31 - Yasmine-Belkaid - 1340.jpg instead, per my rationale on that nomination's page. -- PhilipTerryGraham (talk) 06:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. 2017-03-31 - Yasmine Belkaid - 1290.jpg: -1 <-- 2. 2017-03-31 - Yasmine-Belkaid - 1340.jpg: +4 => File:2017-03-31 - Yasmine Belkaid - 1290.jpg: Declined. <-- File:2017-03-31 - Yasmine-Belkaid - 1340.jpg: Promoted. --DeFacto (talk). 21:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Yann (talk) on 2017-04-08 09:32 (UTC) Scope: Yasmine Belkaid, portrait photograph  Support Useful and used. ~ Moheen (keep talking) 16:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)  Oppose - Not as good or useful as the other photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)  Support - This seems to be the better portrait of Belkaid, as there isn't anything distracting behind the viewer - she is the one, sole and central subject of the photograph. It is also a more neutral photograph. The other nominee, File:2017-03-31 - Yasmine Belkaid - 1290.jpg, depicts her gleefully smiling. -- PhilipTerryGraham (talk) 06:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)  Best in Scope Ivanhercaz (talk) 00:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC)  Best in Scope Santamarcanda (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC) Scores: 1. 2017-03-31 - Yasmine Belkaid - 1290.jpg: -1 2. 2017-03-31 - Yasmine-Belkaid - 1340.jpg: +4 <-- => File:2017-03-31 - Yasmine Belkaid - 1290.jpg: Declined. File:2017-03-31 - Yasmine-Belkaid - 1340.jpg: Promoted. <-- --DeFacto (talk). 21:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)