Commons:Administrators/Requests/Blurpeace

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship.

 Support = 11;  Oppose = 0;  Neutral = 0 - 100%

Closed as successful by — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // at 13:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Blurpeace

Vote

⧼Edittoolbar-help-page-link⧽: Blurpeace (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end 06:01, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Blurpeace is a very active user who participates in many admin related fields. His account was created in December of 2008, and he has been actively editing since June. Blurpeace has a wide variety of experience, including tagging files as copyright violations, recent changes patrol (including marking new gallery pages as patrolled with the newly implemented user right for Commons), and reviewing Flickr files. Additionally, Blurpeace has uploaded a number of images to the project, and has made over 1000 edits.

Blurpeace is friendly in his communications with others, knowledgeable about practices and policies on Commons, and a very helpful user. I believe Blurpeace would be a great help to the project as an admin, especially in a time when Commons needs additional admins. I hope you think so too. Killiondude (talk) 05:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Conomination

Per the above. Blurpeace is hardworking, clueful, and friendly. An excellent editor who'd be better with tools. Durova (talk) 05:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

I gratefully accept. Thank you, –blurpeace ^(talk) 06:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Votes

•  Support as a nominator. Killiondude (talk) 06:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I have worked with this user for many months; he knows what needs to be done and knows about the licensing. He is also willing to tackle backlogs that need a lot of work. I feel comfortable with him having the tools. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 07:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Should be OK with the tools. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --The Evil IP address (talk) 18:09, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support. Very helpful in DRs already, I'm sure he'll do a good job as an admin. –Tryphon^☂ 08:12, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support looks like a good option - thanks for helping out. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support per Herby. —Dferg ^(disputatio) 16:14, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support. Why not? -FASTILY ^(TALK) 02:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Anyone willing to admit their mistakes is a decent person. --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 23:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 22:14, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments

•  Comment - Can you please indicate on your userpage what languages you are proficient in, perhaps with the related userboxes? Cirt (talk) 12:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

• Userboxes added. Thanks, –blurpeace ^(talk) 22:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Question I've noted this edit summary. What are you referring to with “once more”? --The Evil IP address (talk) 11:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

• Was referring to this edit summary. Due to my browser switching, it's not too unusual for me to log out and accidentally make an action under my IP address. –blurpeace ^(talk) 13:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.