Category talk:Prekmurian language

Here no room for this, as ludicrous this method. R.Schuster not ken the prekmurian, and besides the SIL International was had a petition, that register the prekmurian. Doncsecz (talk) 13:54, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

The manifestation of R.Schuster is galling and chauvinist, as in few wikipedia was initiate campaign. His knowledge on the score of the Slovene language and Slovene dialects is even the zero. Doncsecz (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree with R.Schuster it should be renamed --Jarekt (talk) 14:31, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I see, that the Polish wikipedia was move the article of prekmurian language in dialect, but was unfounded. The Slovene linguist so call the prekmurian: prekmurščina, the -ščina ist language. Doncsecz (talk) 14:38, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Because of this dispute, I started the discussion here, so that all parties have plenty of time to state their opinions. Your behaviour of repeatedly blanking the page without discussion is unacceptable, therefor I've filed a case at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism#User:Doncsecz. --R.Schuster (talk) 14:42, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Your attitude is unacceptable, as i have evidences, but for you the Slovene and Hungarian sources is "forgerys". Doncsecz (talk) 14:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

The slovene wikipedia 4 years support the use of prekmurščina name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doncsecz (talk • contribs) 15:15, 14 June 2010 (UTC) (UTC)

That's not true: The article was originally named Prekmursko narečje and you was the one who moved this article to Prekmurščina in December 2008. So there is no support from the slovene wikipedia, and not at all since 4 years. You believe we're all stupid here, don't you? --R.Schuster (talk) 17:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

 Request User:R.Schuster and User:Doncsecz please stop your discussion here and in other places on Commons. Let other people resolve this conflict. --Jarekt (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

First redundant the voice in this theme, if the person inexpert in the theme, and R.Schuster have not knowledge. Doncsecz (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

1. Ken not the prekmurian and declare: this is low, dinkey dialect
2. Cas doubt on few notable questings, which except the prekmurian in the Slovene dialects.
3. Some of this researcher is was deal with the prekmurian 50-60 year, for ex. Vilko Novak, slavist, searcher and recognized person
4. If R.Schuster is inexpert, needless chip on the prekmurian theme Doncsecz
5. R.Schuster fanatical crusader, wantonly state these: have not authentic source. But this source from Vilko Novak is objective, recognized source. Doncsecz (talk)

Here R.Schuster feign, that this lexicons not mention the prekmurian. This is pathological! The foreign quest of the prekmurian was even depart, and presently notice every Lexicon in this World? Doncsecz (talk) 18:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

This books is standards of a literary language

The sources in Slovene language also wrote about the prekmurski knjižni jezik (prekmurski=prekmurian, knjižni=literary, jezik=language), and not about narečje(=dialect). Thus this is images, files of the prekmurian (literary) language. See also this links: from the University of Maribor RAZVOJ PREKMURSKEGA KNJIŽNEGA JEZIKA MED OBEMA VOJNAMA (NA PRIMERU ANALIZE ČLANKOV V PREKMURSKEM GLASNIKU IN DÜŠEVNEM LISTU); Prekmurski knjižni jezik in Pavlova slovnica prekmurskega jezika; Marko Jesenšek: Stične točke pri oblikovanju slovaškega in prekmurskega knjižnega jezika; Vprašanje prekmurskega knjižnega jezika.; Začetki prekmurskega knjižnega jezika: rokopisni vstavek Andreja Rogana v Vramčevi Postili (1586); Vpliv Agustičeve publicistične dejavnosti na razvoj knjižne prekmurščine(=literary Prekmurian) Doncsecz (talk) 11:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)