User talk:ZeroJeden

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ZeroJeden!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:26, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

szablon

Hej. Nie zapomnij pododawać do zdjęć zabytków szablonu {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2012|pl}}. To przez to twoje ostatnie fotki nie są w kategorii konkursowej. Przykuta → [edit] 10:53, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa - Cmentarz Powstańców Warszawy - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Trochę mała rozdzielczość, ale ładne. --Sfu 09:32, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, ZeroJeden!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kawęczyn - dwór - ZJ005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice atmosphere, with good detail. --Karora 08:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamek Czocha - ZJ008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly too dark, still I like it Panek 20:36, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darłowo - latarnia morska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the light and composition, the quality is good enough for QI imo.--ArildV 09:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamek Grodno - brama wjazdowa na zamek górny - ZJ001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not categorized --Rjcastillo 00:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa - plac Zamkowy 17-19 - ZJ001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:45, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruiny zamku w Chęcinach - ZJ011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:45, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa - Rynek Starego Miasta 8 - ZJ001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruiny zamku w Owieśnie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak pro, unsharp on the left but all in all it’s OK --Kreuzschnabel 13:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamek w Pieskowej Skale - ZJ003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 08:10, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Żyrardów kościół pw. MB Pocieszenia - ZJ006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction... ... ... haha. Joke. Good quality and QI for me. --Smial 15:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamek Bąkowiec w Morsku - ZJ001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamek w Wojnowicach - wykusz latrynowy - ZJ002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:31, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warszawa - Piwna 19 - ZJ001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 12:52, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siedlisko - zamek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 17:06, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zamek w Liwie - ZJ002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Kreuzschnabel 17:06, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Gardeners House in Wilanów

Where is this ?

Hallo ZeroJeden, interesting photo. Could you pls tell address and - if possible - coordinates for this building ? Rgds --Wistula (talk) 15:40, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

https://maps.google.pl/?ll=52.166734,21.088652&spn=0.000295,0.000884&t=h&z=21 --ZeroJeden (talk) 15:59, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

thanks. --Wistula (talk) 17:35, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

kategoryzacja

Cześć, wygląda na to, że nie jesteś jednym z uczestników WLZ, którzy od 31 września nie zaglądają do Commons, więc cię zagadnę. Jak się nietrudno zorientować, grafiki w Commons są kategoryzowane. Kategorie są najróżniejsze. Szablony zabytków WLZ na przykład wrzucają automatycznie do kategorii "Cultural monuments in gmina Taka-a-owaka". Inne kategorie dodaje się ręcznie. Commons jednak nie powinno być workiem bez ładu i składu, więc kategorie powinny tworzyć spójny zhierarchizowany system. Tymczasem po takich masowych akcjach, jak WLZ, powstają kategorie-worki, których nie da się rozsądnie przegladać. Np., w chwili, gdy to piszę Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Warsaw ma 1748 wiszących luzem plików. Na jednej stronie kategorii da się zobaczyć tylko 200 miniaturek, więc żeby coś znaleźć w takiej kategorii, trzeba klikać przez 9 stron. Dlatego tam, gdzie się tylko da, warto kategoryzować dokładniej. Np. popatrz, co zrobiłem z twoimi zdjęciami kamienicy przy Nowym Świecie 49 w Warszawie. Otóż kamienica ta ma juz na commons swoją kategorię: Category:Bentkowski Tenement House in Warsaw, więc twoje jej zdjęcia dodałem właśnie do niej. Ponadto, kategoria ta ma podkategorię, do której pasuje kolejny twój plik File:Warszawa - Nowy Świat 49 - ZJ001.jpg, czyli Category:Place of National Memory at 49, Nowy Świat Street in Warsaw. Skoro tak, to właśnie tam przeniosłem ten plik (i nie musi on być dodatkowo w kategorii Category:Bentkowski Tenement House in Warsaw czy Category:Warsaw Uprising plaques czy wreszcie Category:Struggle and Martyrdom commemorative plaques in Warsaw, bo należąc do Category:Place of National Memory at 49, Nowy Świat Street in Warsaw, należy już do wszystkich tamtych. Co więcej, skoro szablon {{Zabytek}} z odpowiednimi danymi jest już w kategorii Category:Bentkowski Tenement House in Warsaw (bo to cała kamienica Bentkowskiego łącznie z tablicą Tchorka jest zabytkiem), to ten sam szablon w poszczególnych plikach tej kategorii jest zbędny, więc go usunąłem. W ten sposób z kategorii Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Warsaw zniknęło kilka wiszących luzem i trudnych do odnalezienia plików, a pojawiły się one w jednoznacznej kategorii. Mój wywód zmierza do tego, że tego typu przenosiny zajmują dużo czasu, gdy porywa się na kilkadziesiąt tysięcy plików (np. Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Poland with unknown gmina ma jeszcze 2680 plików, choć parę dni temu było ich dwa razy więcej), więc gdybyś się czuł (czuła?) na siłach poprzeglądać swoje pliki i spróbować je pokategoryzować, byłaby zawsze jedna para rąk więcej. Oczywiście, system kategorii nie jest idealny i nie tak łatwo się w nim połapać nowicjuszowi, ale przyglądając się, jak to robia inni, można się w końcu nauczyć. Panek (talk) 12:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Owszem, na to wyglądało, że takim użytkownikiem nie byłem. Zaglądałem tu, porządkowałem tabele z wykazem zabytków, obrabiałem dane, przygotowywałem je do wrzucenia na koniec w pełni uzupełnione do wikimedii. Ale w tej chwili mogę tę propozycję co najwyżej zbyć śmiechem :) Po tym jak człowiek poświęca energię na uczestnictwo w jakimś konkursie, a następnie organizatorzy nabijają się z własnego regulaminu i uczestników przyznając nagrody według jakiegoś kumoterskiego klucza - nie ma się już żadnej ochoty na kontynuowanie prac :) Przez ostatni miesiąc zajmowałem się lokalizowaniem zabytków z wykazu, które jeszcze współrzędnych nie miały. Z ponad 30 tysięcy takich obiektów mam już uzupełnione ponad 25 tys., ale jak widzę jakimi zasadami kieruje się (a raczej nie kieruje) komisja wychwalanego przez siebie konkursu - nie mam już ochoty dzielić się z wikipedią niczym własnym - ani czasem, ani energią, ani ochotą do działalności charytatywnej :) Prowadzę własny serwis www, pod którym się podpisując przynajmniej mam spokojne sumienie, że jest pod każdym względem serwisem uczciwym, w przeciwieństwie do wikimedii. Pozdrawiam. ZeroJeden (talk) 12:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear ZeroJeden, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 14:39, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Identyfikacja zabytku

Cześć, wydaje mi się, że dom na zdjęciu File:Sandomierz - Opatowska 8 - ZJ001.jpg nie jest zabytkiem i nie przedstawia budynku przy Opatowskiej 8 w Sandomierzu. Proszę, zerknij na niego jeszcze raz. Z pozdrowieniami, Nova (talk) 18:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)