User talk:Ximonic/Archive/2009
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please use sub-categories
--Apalsola t • c 12:58, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: 12:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Alps categories
hi Ximonic, i reverted some of your recats, please do not confuse geology with orography - greetings W!B: (talk) 22:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- besides. what would be the sense of Category:Nature of the Alps? only two cats, what would you place else in there? W!B: (talk) 22:35, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Just thought if they would grow in the future somehow... perhaps? Otherwise the new stuff would possibly go to Category:Alps again so it was recommended to make subcategories to orginize such media.Ximonic (talk) 18:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- In Finland geology used to be classified as one field of geography. Ximonic (talk) 18:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think we don't have such study as orography, not sure but have never heard about. We do have geomorphology which (with geology) belongs to geography. There might be some differences between the finnish and english arrangements. Ximonic (talk) 18:54, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- In Finland geology used to be classified as one field of geography. Ximonic (talk) 18:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Just thought if they would grow in the future somehow... perhaps? Otherwise the new stuff would possibly go to Category:Alps again so it was recommended to make subcategories to orginize such media.Ximonic (talk) 18:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Ximonic (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Please be aware that by the start of 2010 the norwegian road system will be reformed. The trunk roads only will stay national roads, the other roads will be transferred to regional roads (fylkesvei). I think it is advisable to wait a couple of months before further categorizing of norwegian roads. Regards, BjørnN (talk) 22:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- Good to know. --Ximonic (talk) 22:47, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Ximonic (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Palace of the Parliament, Bucharest 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Jmabel ! talk 19:03, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Ximonic (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Palace of the Parliament, Bucharest.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Jmabel ! talk 19:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: Ximonic (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2015 (UTC)