User talk:Xicotencatl/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Xicotencatl!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Xicotencatl, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:55, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flowers at UBC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality but a precise classification (with binomial name) is needed, please. --JLPC 16:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)  Done (I think) Xicotencatl OK with the new caption. --JLPC 16:47, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irving K Barber 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 09:20, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Earth and Ocean Sciences Building UBC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 09:40, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Rose Garden 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit too much sky, and also a bit too much blue --A.Savin 09:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)  Done --Xicotencatl 15:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC) Enough for QI now --A.Savin 20:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mathematical Annex UBC 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some magenta chromatic aberrations on the tree, and on the very left building --A.Savin 09:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC) Comment: Better now? --Xicotencatl 15:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC) OK to me --A.Savin 20:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Theology Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaty Blue Whale 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 15:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Europe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:04, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Xicotencatl, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Xicotencatl, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Haida House 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC museum of anthropology 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vancouver from Queen Elizabeth Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Florstein 16:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum of anthropology 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 10:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum of anthropology 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Popocatepetl 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I love it! --Hubertl 10:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre Dame de Montreal 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museum of Anthropology UBC 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vancouver Block.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not the best. IMO better with less empty space on the right.--XRay 16:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC) Cropped the right side. --Xicotencatl 06:57, 25 June 2015 (UTC) Weak  Support IMO good for QI.--XRay 15:43, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hudson's Bay Company Vancouver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. IMO the windows should be centered with respect to the columns. --XRay 16:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC) I can crop it a bit from the left, but it is impossible to center it. Since it's already on a support vote, I have not modified it for now. --Xicotencatl 07:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! English Bay Vancouver 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO too much dust and too much blue, too much sky and too much stones in the foreground. IMO you should check your image.--XRay 15:42, 2 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment Increased temperature to remove blue, decreased amount of sky. Rocks in the foreground are on purpose. --Xicotencatl 16:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Weak  Support May be more contrast will improve the bridge.--XRay 16:24, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! English Bay Vancouver 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very slightly tilted CCW too, check the horizon. Be careful with oversharpening, don't go beyond! --Kadellar 17:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment Thanks! I decreased sharpness and rotated the picture slightly. --Xicotencatl 18:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Not the best light, but QI now, thanks. --Kadellar 18:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! English Bay Vancouver 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is slightly tilted CCW. --Kadellar 17:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment I rotated it slightly, but I am not sure it I made it worse. --Xicotencatl 18:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Fine now, thanks. --Kadellar 18:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! English Bay Vancouver 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 15:33, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! English Bay Vancouver 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coal Harbour Vancouver 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 19:54, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BC Yellow Sky 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted ccw. WB off - too much red in the lower part of the image; the concrete of the buildings is not affected by the forest fires, is it? --Cccefalon 06:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)  Comment Yes, you're right. I uploaded a new version. --Xicotencatl 07:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC) The WB is much better but the ccw tilt is still present. Please see the verticals of the buildings. --Cccefalon 08:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC) Sorry, but I disagree that the image is tilted. The buildings look vertical to me. --Xicotencatl 06:50, 7 July 2015 (UTC) I left a note, how to judge the verticals. Just give it a try. However, it is only a very small rotation and should not be a reason to decline. --Cccefalon 02:50, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irving K. Barber UBC 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A bit too light, IMO, but ok. --Hubertl 11:11, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irving K. Barber UBC 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

GEocoding?

Why don´t you use the map-function in Lightroom? It´s simple, fast and very accurate. And you can tag many with just one click. --Hubertl (talk) 18:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes thanks! I'll do that for future uploads. --Xicotencatl (talk) 19:37, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Museum of Anthropology 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Museum of Anthropology 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo --Michielverbeek 11:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raven and the First Men 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your response.

The reason, why I asked was, that many of your pictures have some posterisation and - as it looks like - jpg-artifacts in the low structured, white sky. That makes it difficult for me, to promote this images. I was just thinking about, what the reason could be. Are you always going back to the origional (or a psd, or a 16bit-Tiff) when making some changes? Every new jpg conversion makes a picture worse, even when you use the lowest compression rate. I feel a bit helpless. Please make some tests or send me one of those original files, not per mail, use drive.google oder dropbox instead. I´m really very interested to check this out. Its really a pity! --Hubertl (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes, whenever I edit pictures, I go back to the original raw file in Lightroom. I really can't see the posterization you mention, but I reworked the file anyway. (This file for reference: [1]). Do you still see the posterization? If you do, as you suggested, I can send you the raw file of this and one or two others where you notice the same thing (just please point out which ones). Thanks! --Xicotencatl (talk) 05:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Museum of Anthropology Multiversity Galleries 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit tight crop at the bottom, but ok --Poco a poco 18:11, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Museum of Anthropology 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:59, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Museum of Anthropology 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:41, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raven and the First Men 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:12, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koerner library ubc 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI. --Hubertl 13:48, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irving K. Barber UBC 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A decent picture of average quality. I've updated the description too. Dllu 17:50, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robson Square Vancouver 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:53, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UBC Museum of Anthropology 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:29, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robson Square Vancouver 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vancouver Block 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. --Hubertl 14:05, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robson Square 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robson Square 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)