User talk:Wilhelmy
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 12:13, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Stonehenge, Modell.jpg was uncategorized on 4 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Stonehenge, Rekonstruktion.jpg was uncategorized on 4 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Westerland Musikmuschel-2.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:31, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:D Day Embarkation Ramps memorial, Torquay Harbour links.jpg was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:D Day Embarkation Ramps memorial, Torquay Harbour rechts.jpg was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tastmodell Museumsinsel.jpg was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:53, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tastmodell-2.JPG was uncategorized on 1 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:39, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Die Lizenzfrage konnte am 09.01.2012 geklärt und dem Bild angefügt werden. Ist damit das Problem geklärt? --Wilhelmy (talk) 18:41, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Please sign your postings
[edit]As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
cyrfaw (talk) 01:11, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Chruschtschow.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Stonehenge, Rekonstruktion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hchc2009 (talk) 22:40, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ingwer-Familie, Hinweistafel im Botanischen Garten von Singapur.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ingwer-Familie, Hinweistafel im Botanischen Garten von Singapur.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Hallo, ich habe dem Botanischen Garten Singapur um Freigabe gebeten, die Antwort steht noch aus, Wilhelmy 16.11.2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilhelmy (talk • contribs) 19:27, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Hinweis auf die Herkunft des Namens "Waikiki".jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hinweis auf die Herkunft des Namens "Waikiki".jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Das Bild dient als Quellennachweis für den Eintrag, woher der Name "Waikiki" stammt, Wilhelmy 16.11.2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilhelmy (talk • contribs) 19:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Josef Frank 1922.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Goesseln (talk) 21:36, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Titus Neupert.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Lutheraner (talk) 23:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Guten Tag,
das Foto wurde mir von Titus Neupert für die Veröffentlichung in Wikipedia per Mail zur Verfügung gestellt:
Im Anhang sende ich Ihnen wie gewünscht einen kurzen Artikel und ein Foto (von 2018), das unter cc Lizenz genutzt werden kann.
Gruß Wilhelmy (talk) 09:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Guenter-m-ziegler 2021.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion as promotional material. Wikimedia Commons doesn't allow advertisements. Use Google Ads, Facebook ads or find other forums/websites. If you continue to upload advertisements, you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Trade.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 22:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Guenter-m-ziegler 2021.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Guenter-m-ziegler 2021.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Guenter-m-ziegler 2021.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gbawden (talk) 10:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Rotations-Drachen.webm
[edit]Copyright status: File:Rotations-Drachen.webm
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Rotations-Drachen.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Guten Tag,
- es handelt sich um mein eigenes Werk, das ich mit der Creative-Commons-Lizenz
This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. | |
The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
|
meinte, zur allgemeinen Verwendung freigegeben zu haben. Wenn das nicht ausreicht, füge bitte
I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law. |
stattdessen ein. Danke. Wilhelmy (talk) 12:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Rundara in der Alten Nationalgalerie.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Rundara in der Alten Nationalgalerie.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Rundara in der Alten Nationalgalerie.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Guten Tag,
- bei beiden Abbildungen habe ich die freie Lizenz CC-BY angegeben:
- |Genehmigung
- (Weiternutzung dieser Datei)
- |CC-BY
- |}
- File:Rundara in der Alten Nationalgalerie.jpg
- File:Rundara im Schloss Glienicke.jpg
- Habe ich etwas falsch gemacht?
- Oder wie wäre es gleich korrekt gewesen?
- MfG Wilhelmy (talk) 21:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)