User talk:Wilfredor/Archive 19
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:Angel Of Light (4925616100).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2003:45:5C6F:1201:B06D:3731:59E8:A7A0 06:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Opinião
Esta daqui é boa para nomear? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:47, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
hunf
Eu falei pra não nomear, hunf! E o problema não é de tilt, é que é o Copan, lembra que ele é curvado? Eu vou ter que voltar lá pq os limites da foto não estão nítidos. -- RTA 18:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Rodrigo.Argenton: O que você acha da foto acima? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Arion, eu acho que não o Copan está com áreas completamente estouradas, não está nítido, gosto do trabalho que foi feito quanto a granulação, mas não acho que foi feito de forma a se perder nitidez. E falta algo na foto, um poder. -- RTA 18:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Disculpa RTA por não pedir permissão para você --The Photographer (talk) 19:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Wilfredo, você já pode carregar as suas imagens? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- @ArionEstar: Sim pode seguro cara!--The Photographer (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
-
- Precisa pedir permissão não, só que não era uma foto boa, só isso, abraços. -- RTA 21:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)--The Photographer (talk) 16:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Wilfredo, você já pode carregar as suas imagens? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Obrigado RTA, você acha que poderiamos sair juntos a tomar fotos?, vc Arion? --The Photographer (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Por favor, carregue suas fotos, não vejo a hora de nomeá-las! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- @ArionEstar: pronto --The Photographer (talk) 16:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Muito obrigado!!!!!! Não vejo a hora de nomeá-las. Assim que uma nomeação minha se encerrar eu vou direto nas suas. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- P.S.: Olha o que eu fiz: File:Webysther 20151224005954 - Raio (cropped).jpg. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Webysther: Parabens por sua foto, fico uma beleza!!. Guste que fico certinho no centro, wow --The Photographer (talk) 16:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Wilfredo, carregue essas daqui também: [1], [2] (ambos em Reflexôes), [3], [4]. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Wilfredo, eu vejo que você pode nomear mais uma imagem, então nomeie essa imagem sua em que corrigi a perspectiva: File:Catedral Presbiteriana de Río de Janeiro.jpg. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- @The Photographer: Valeu! Desculpa por sumir pessoal, estava estudando para a USP e valeu a pena, passei! Amanhã começa as aulas, mas tenho boas notícias: estou com uns 5 mil cliques feitos e ainda não estão arrumadas, mas devem render umas 100/200 imagens novas para aqui, durante o ano conforme tiver tempo (espero que eu tenha), vou enviando, estou meio sumido mas sempre por perto! 😁 -- Webysther (talk)
- @ArionEstar: Não surte, mas consegui uma foto de uma jiboia filhote que ficou fantástica! Aguarde. -- Webysther (talk)
- Disculpa RTA por não pedir permissão para você --The Photographer (talk) 19:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
@Webysther: Aproveite e nomeie a imagem sua que eu recortei… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- @ArionEstar: Feito. -- Webysther (talk)
- @Webysther: Um dia poderíamos sair a fazer algumas imagens perto do Museo da Língua portuguesa que agora esta estragado. Primero som as clases, isto e somente por diversão. Que acha você?, não se si Arion e RTA estão por ali --The Photographer (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- @The Photographer: Topo! me manda um e-mail com seu contato no facebook ou whatsapp para 'webysther arroba gmail ponto com', adoraria ter encontros fotográficos com o pessoal que está em SP. :) -- Webysther (talk)
- @Webysther: Eu digo nomear como candidata a imagem destacada. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Civa (talk) 17:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Hawkingsig.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jasoneskin (talk) 17:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
RFA
Please don't be discouraged by the outcome. If you need any stuffs done, feel free to ask me and I'll be happy to help :) --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 13:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Zhuyifei1999: Thanks for your message, I am not discouraged, I have only free time that I will use in other things :) --The Photographer (talk) 13:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Vamos trabalhar com todo o esforço em FPC
Vamos lá! Carregue suas imagens para que eu possa nomeá-las. Já nomeei uma. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Shoe trees.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shoe trees.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Your call touched my heart
You shall be duly acknowledged in various places :) Let me take care of that :) Seriously... thank you Anthere (talk)
- @Anthere: :) Thanks! --The Photographer (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Vamos lá, vamos lá
Vamos lá venezuelano!!!! Já consegui mais uma. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:45, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- @ArionEstar: kkkk, vc esta muito doido --The Photographer (talk) 00:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Estou empolgado e com disposição para nomear imagens! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- @ArionEstar: Ainda não olhes o flickr, tenho que concertar algumas delas. --The Photographer (talk) 02:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Universite Laval, Les Presses Universitaires Laval.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison Bethanie, Quebec city.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! House 23 in Quebec city downtown.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Ice sculpture in Quebec city downtown.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ice sculpture in Quebec city downtown.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Barber shop, Quebec city, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, SCP-2000 13:09, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Zppix (talk) 00:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Place D'Youville, Quebec City, Canada 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Place D'Youville, Quebec City, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Place D'Youville, Quebec City, Canada 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Place D'Youville, Quebec City, Canada 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|