User talk:Wieralee/2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:台灣飛機修護公司新2機棚廠新建工程動土典禮.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Wrong company name.)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Solomon203.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

University and college yearbooks

Category discussion warning

University and college yearbooks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


IagoQnsi (talk) 04:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File:KPE-Feldmeisterin München 1990.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mediatus (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Stachys officinalis subsp. serotina

I note that you have reverted the page Stachys officinalis subsp. serotina and I recommend that you see the references in Kew, POWO, IPNI & Catalogue of Life where they consider it a sononym of Betonica officinalis var. serotina. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 07:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

@MILEPRI: I've reverted it, because you've made double redirecting wheel:
=> Category:Stachys officinalis subsp. serotina => Category:Betonica officinalis var. serotina => Category:Stachys officinalis subsp. serotina => Category:Betonica officinalis var. serotina, etc...
A redirect can't redirect to another redirect! One of these categories must be alive. Wieralee (talk) 22:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Szreniawa bez krzyża

Dzień dobry, piszę w sprawie błędu jaki popełniłaś uzasadniając brak akceptacji przeniesienia tego pliku: [1] do innej nazwy. Czynnie zajmuję się heraldyką na polskiej Wikipedii i jestem jedyną osobą, która obecnie zajmuje się tam tym tematem. Nie istnieje taki herb jak "Szreniawa bez Krzyża", jest to jedynie nazwa robocza herbu Drużyna, która z czasem przyjęła się jako nazwa alternatywna. Dodatkowo, herb Lubomirskich w wersji książęcej nazywa się po prostu Lubomirski - nie Drużyna, a tym bardziej nie Szreniawa bez Krzyża. Ponownie proszę o przeniesienie nazwy tego pliku, ponieważ niepotrzebnie wprowadza ludzi w błąd. Pozdrawiam, Gucce (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

@Gucce: Napisałam, że nie jest to tylko herb Lubomirskich, posługuje się nim wiele innych rodzin. Czy tak nie jest? Wieralee (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
@Wieralee: Jest to herb należący tylko do rodziny Lubomirskich. Nazwa herbu to dosłownie Lubomirski. Pozostałe rodziny, które wymieniłaś używają herbu Drużyna. Guccee (talk) 12:08, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Józef Unger (Tygodnik Illustrowany, 1878).jpg.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: bad name)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Mewa767.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Chile (185) - Food Delivery.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 07:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Question: correct file naming

Hello Wieralee. You declined my renaming request for file Aili Somersalmi Imogenen roolissa Kansallisteatterin näytelmässä Cymbeline (musketti.M012-HK19710227-3).jpg. That is your decision and I respect that. I didn't mean that file name must been in English (1930s), it could also been 1930-luku or 1930-luvulla ("Aili Somersalmi 1910s.jpg" or something). How about "Aili Somersalmi näytelmässä Cymbeline 1930-luvulla.jpg" and not an unnecessary file id ("name that describes what the image particularly displays")? Description of Criterion 2 is "meaningless or ambiguous name". You are right that name isn't meaningless. I think it is however ambiguous and unclear. My purpose is not making new name looks only a bit better. I have done a few similar requests as you can see my editing history. @CAPTAIN RAJU and Richardkiwi: Can I ask your opinions? How can I edit in the future? Examples:

  1. Mechelin Emelie, laulajatar (hkm.HKMS000005-000002ll).jpg renaming request or not
  2. Only Finnish file names for actresses from Finland

---raid5 22:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Category Files uploaded by FinnaUploadBot contains a lot of ambiguous file names. Maybe I should not add renaming request for these files? ---raid5 22:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I only looked at the first one (it's bedtime here in The Netherlands) :-) 0:38 (CEST). No need to rename the first one i.m.o. - the Inventory number is in the title. Greetz, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:39, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for answering. I should go to sleep althoug it still quite light, two hours and sun will rise. Ok, I'll take a break for renaming requests. ---raid5 22:51, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
  • @Raid5: maybe the file ID is not necessary for you... but it can be useful for a photo author/uploader. It's harmless. Even if we'll rename the file, the old version will ALWAYS exist on Commons servers and the link File:Aili Somersalmi Imogenen roolissa Kansallisteatterin näytelmässä Cymbeline (musketti.M012-HK19710227-3).jpg will ALWAYS be active and connected with the new version of the name. If the name is not totally wrong and totally meaningless we recommend not to change it. You can add to this file any description in any language and our Commons browser will show it in search results, too. There is a rule: "Files should NOT be renamed only because the new name looks a bit better." It's better to find more useful work, I think ;) Wieralee (talk) 22:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Ok. I don't argue, but… I will continue uploading files from Finna and try to learn more policies and guidelines of Commons. ---raid5 23:27, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Jelak images

Why did you reverted the name changes!? I was doing it with coordination with the uploader! I was trying to make some order! You could not notice the propper rearagement?! Dandarmkd (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC) I, the uploader approve the name changes. Дарко (talk) 16:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

I, the uploader approve the name changes. Дарко (talk) 16:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

  • @Dandarmkd and Onosim: There's no need to renumber the photos... the rule: "all files in category should be numbered chronologically" doesn't exist. Harmonization in the Category is dedicated for templates and Wikisources only. However, the original uploader can always ask for renaming using Criterion #1, but he has to do it personally. Best wishes, Wieralee (talk) 17:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
    Whenever an editor tries to make something better and when the facts show that he improves something, other people should validate and not just to interfere by cancellation of the effort. Review properly, than evaluate. Dandarmkd (talk) 17:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)