User talk:Warden
Feel free to leave a message for me.
If you want to reach me quickly, send an e-mail.
Older discussions can be found in the archive.
Image Tagging Image:Hagerstown_Public_Sruare_c1900.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Hagerstown_Public_Sruare_c1900.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Siebrand. I'm not the uploader of Image:Hagerstown_Public_Sruare_c1900.jpg, I have nothing to do with the picture, just that I reverted some nasty pic that was later deleted by an administrator. Original uploader was User:Brybenj, who seems to have uploaded only this pic. --Warden 22:54, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Albpanorama-Dusslingen-Beschriftung.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 13:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
UTM
[edit]Hallo, Du hast bei vielen Bildern nur UTM Koordinaten ohne Formatierung angegeben. Damit kann Commons und Wikipedia leider nichts anfangen. Mit http://home.hiwaay.net/~taylorc/toolbox/geography/geoutm.html habe ich bei der Mahneiche File:Schoenbuch-mahneiche01.jpg schon einmal umgerechnet und ein Location-tag zu der Datei inzugefügt. Gruss HBR (talk)
Category discussion notification | Category:Hovercrafts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
Communications towers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Cqdx (talk) 20:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Microsoft has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
5.60.232.75 17:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Microsoft has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |